Reshaping Ullmann Amine Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Mild Approach for Cu-Catalyzed C–N Coupling Reactions With No Additional Ligands

Introduction

The century “classical” Ullmann reaction is known to be the first transition metal-mediated organic transformation, and it was used for the synthesis of symmetric biaryls from aryl halides (Ullmann, 1901, 1903, 1904; Goldberg, 1906). However, as it suffered from the requirement of stoichiometric amounts of copper salts, harsh reaction conditions (temperatures ≥200°C), poor functional group tolerance and low yields of the expected adducts, it remained dormant for decades with limited applications. As a result of the tremendous impact of Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions have had in the field of organic synthesis over the past 25 years (Seechurn et al., 2012; Sherwood et al., 2019), there has been recently a revival of interest in the so-called “Ullmann-type” reaction, which makes use of cheaper and environmentally responsible first-row transition metals to catalyze the nucleophilic aromatic substitution between an aryl halide and a nucleophile (Cristau et al., 2004, 2005; Chen and Chen, 2006; Shafir and Buchwald, 2006; Jones et al., 2007; Ma and Cai, 2008; Tye et al., 2008; Beletskaya and Ananikov, 2011; Sambiagio et al., 2014). The fundamental interrogation of how this reaction proceeds (radical or polar mechanism) has been a matter of debate throughout the years, and details still remain challenging today. A mechanism involving a Cu(I)/Cu(III) catalytic cycle has been experimentally supported in most Ullmann-type couplings, whereas the one-electron redox pathway involving aryl radical species is thought to take place in certain C-Heteroatom coupling reactions under light irradiation (Strieter et al., 2005; Tye et al., 2008; Giri and Hartwig, 2010; Sperotto et al., 2010; Casitas and Ribas, 2013; Ribas and Güell, 2014).

Among N-arylation strategies available in the armory of the synthetic chemist, the Ullmann amine synthesis (UAS) has sparked in recent years the interest of the scientific community as it well complements the most famous Pd-catalyzed Hartwig-Buchwald amination reaction (Hartwig, 1998, 2000; Wolfe et al., 1998; De Meijere and Diederich, 2004; Surry and Buchwald, 2008). Key aspects of the UAS are the use of (a) polydentate auxiliary ligands with oxygen- or nitrogen coordination sites (e.g., diamines, amino acids, oximes, diols, 1,10-phenantrolines), which often improve the solubility of the copper precursors and the stability of the active catalyst, and/or (b) toxic and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (e.g., DMF, DMSO, dioxane, THF, toluene) (Scheme 1A) (Evano et al., 2008; Monnier and Taillefer, 2009; Surry and Buchwald, 2010; Zhang et al., 2012b; Jiang et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2017). Copper-catalyzed N-arylation in water or in aqueous media are also known. However, they are usually carried out in the presence of phase transfer catalysts and with ligands, and often require high reaction temperature (100–130°C) (Li et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2013; Sambiagio et al., 2014; Chakraborti et al., 2018). Interestingly, Wei et al. have reported in 2011 the copper powder-catalyzed ligand-free amination of aryl halides with aliphatic amines in neat water and in air at 100°C, but secondary amines and aniline derivatives proved to be not reactive under these conditions (Jiao et al., 2011). Recent publications have highlighted the successful use of (engineered) surfactants (a) as ligands to stabilize the copper intermediates in the catalytic transformation and (b) to provide a micellar environment favoring the aggregation of reagents in water (Liu and Zhou, 2013; Ge et al., 2019). Green pathways to biaryls via palladium nanoparticles-catalyzed Ullmann reactions in ionic liquids or in ionic liquids/supercritical carbon dioxide systems have also been reported (Durán Pachón et al., 2006; Calò et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2010).

SCHEME 1

Scheme 1. (A) “Classical” Ullmann amine synthesis; (B) bio-based Ullmann amine synthesis; (C) DES-based Ullmann amine synthesis.

Growing efforts are continuously being made to replace harmful, carcinogenic, petroleum-based VOCs with “greener,” recyclable neoteric reaction media, as the largest contribution to the waste stream (over 80%) in the practice of synthetic organic chemistry is provided by solvents (Lipshutz and Ghorai, 2014; Lipshutz et al., 2016). As for the Ullmann-type reaction, an important step forward has recently been made by Vaccaro et al. who developed a waste-minimized protocol for copper-catalyzed UAS in the biomass-derived furfuryl alcohol able to act as an effective bidentate ligand for copper and also to form an azeotrope with water (Scheme 1B) (Ferlin et al., 2018). Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) are mixtures usually made up of a hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and a hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) that, upon mixing together in a proper molar ratio and heating, show an eutectic point temperature far below that of an ideal liquid mixture because of strong hydrogen-bonding interactions between the individual components that decreases the lattice energy of the system. DESs have been defined as the organic reaction medium of the twenty-first century and provide a valuable “green” alternative to common VOCs because of some interesting properties: a low vapor pressure, thermal stability, non-flammability and a high heat capacity (Ruß and König, 2012; Zhang et al., 2012a; García-Álvarez, 2015; García-Álvarez et al., 2015, 2018; Liu et al., 2015; Alonso et al., 2016; Sheldon, 2016; Martins et al., 2018). There is also a consensus that the toxicity and citotoxicity of hydrophilic DESs depend on their components (Hayyan et al., 2013, 2015, 2016). Those based on naturally occurring and biomass-produced compounds [e.g., amino acids, sugars, vitamins, choline chloride (ChCl)] benefit of tunable physicochemical properties, biodegradability, easy preparation, non-toxicity and low cost (Hayyan et al., 2013). To date, N-arylation of amines in DESs has only been performed employing an engineered copper nanoparticle modified carboxamide-functionalized magnetic graphene oxide as an efficient nanocatalyst. The latter was recovered and reused, jointly with the eutectic mixture, for five consecutive runs (Shaabani and Afshari, 2018). N-arylantraquinone derivatives have also been successfully synthesized, under metal-free conditions and in the presence of choline hydroxide as an environmentally benign and recyclable catalyst, however, via an S_NAr mechanistic pathway (Pant et al., 2018). Building on recent breakthroughs made by our research group (Mallardo et al., 2014; Sassone et al., 2015; Cicco et al., 2016, 2017, 2018; Mancuso et al., 2016; Dilauro et al., 2017, 2018, 2019; Messa et al., 2018; Ghinato et al., 2019) and others (Vidal et al., 2014, 2016; Sánchez-Condado et al., 2019) on the effectiveness of using non-conventional reaction media (e.g., DESs and water) for promoting metal-catalyzed and organolithium/Grignard reagent-mediated deprotonation and nucleophilic addition reactions to unsaturated organic substrates under aerobic conditions, here we report the CuI-catalyzed UAS in DESs. The following features of the proposed protocol are noteworthy: (a) the transformation takes place smoothly in a ChCl/glycerol (Gly) eutectic mixture under air and moderate heating (60–100°C), (b) commercially available (hetero)aryl bromides and iodides are employed, (c) the reaction proceeds with no additional ligands and with a broad substrate scope, (d) the expected adducts are isolated in yields up to 98%, and (e) the catalyst, the DES and the base were easily and successfully recycled up to six times (Scheme 1C).

Results and Discussion

As DESs are known to be used not only as solvents, but also as catalytic active species, batch reactions to assess the ability of DESs to promote the UAS with no additional ligands were carried out. We initially investigated as a model reaction the coupling between bromobenzene 1a (0.5 mmol) and N, N-dimethylethylenediamine 2a (1 equiv) in different eutectic mixtures for the preparation of adduct 3aa using CuI (10 mol%) as a catalyst and K₂CO₃ as a base (Table 1). Since the beginning, encouraging results were achieved using DESs as reaction media for this kind of reaction. The mixture ChCl/Gly (1:2 mol mol⁻¹) was the best among those tested as it delivered adduct 3aa in 98% yield after 12 h heating and stirring at 60°C in air (entries 1–4, Table 1). The reaction is characterized by a slow kinetics delivering adduct 3aa in a lower yield at shorter reaction time than 12 h (Figure 1). On the other hand, no coupling was observed by running the reaction at room temperature, in the absence of the base or CuI, whereas the yield of 3aa dropped to 20–60% with a catalyst loading inbetween 5–7 mol% (entries 5–9, Table 1). A screening of bases also revealed that K₂CO₃, KOH and t-BuOK were equally effective when used in 2 equiv (entries 10–12, Table 1). Unsatisfactory outcomes in terms of reaction yield (5–30%) were instead obtained when using water, the ChCl/H₂O (1:2 mol mol⁻¹) eutectic mixture or Gly as the solvent (entries 13–15, Table 1). As has been discussed by Ma in an Account (Ma and Cai, 2008), UAS is generally carried out in the presence of bidentate ligands (among which amino acids) which might make Cu(I) species more reactive toward the oxidative addition reaction or stabilize the oxidative addition intermediates, thereby boosting the coupling process. The fact that the above-described UAS takes place smoothly in DESs in the absence of additional ligands points toward a somewhat stabilizing effect exerted by certain eutectic mixtures on the copper salt, eventually resulting in an improved catalytic performance (Scheme 2).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Optimization of Ullmann amine coupling reaction between bromobenzene 1a and N, N-dimethylethylenediamine 2a to give adduct 3aa^a.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Yield vs. time profile for the synthesis of 3aa at 60°C, in air. The yields were determined by ¹H NMR using CH₂Br₂ as the internal standard.

SCHEME 2

Scheme 2. Possible catalytic cycle for the UAS promoted by DES.

Adopting the optimized conditions described in Table 1, entry 4, we then explored the scope of this cross-coupling reaction with a variety of aliphatic primary and secondary amines (2a–g) and (hetero)aryl halides (1a–l) (Scheme 3). With regard to diamines 2a, b and primary amines 2c–e relatively high yields (53–98%) of the desired coupled products (3ab–3ak, 3bc, 3bk, 3ca, 3ck, 3da, 3eb, 3ek, and 3el) were obtained not only in the reaction with aryl iodides and bromides bearing electron-donating (hydroxy, methoxy) and electron-withdrawing (ester, nitro, cyano, keto) groups at the ortho-, meta-, and para-positions, but also with brominated heterocycles, such as 2- and 3-bromopyridine and 4-bromoisoquinoline. Interestingly, both aliphatic and heterocyclic secondary amines 2f, g proved to be competent coupling partners as well, and afforded (hetero)aryl derivatives 3fk, 3ga, and 3gk in 80–90% yield after simply heating the reaction mixture from 60 to 80°C.

SCHEME 3

Scheme 3. Synthesis of functionalized secondary and tertiary amines 3 by copper-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of (hetero)aryl halides 1 with amines 2. The yields reported are for products isolated and purified by column chromatography.

To further explore the utility of this new protocol, we also investigated the synthesis of diarylamines, which are described in the literature as important molecules due to their antioxidant capacity (Pinto-Basto et al., 2009). Preliminary experiments disclosed that, under the above experimental conditions, aniline (4a) hardly coupled with bromobenzene (1a) as the desired adduct 5aa was delivered in 5% yield only. Even by increasing the temperature to 100°C or by replacing K₂CO₃ with the stronger KOH (3 equiv) the 5aa yield was not higher than 25% (Scheme 4). To our delight, when the UAS was conducted in the presence of 3 equiv of t-BuOK at 100°C, adduct 5aa now formed in 86% yield. This percentage could be improved up to 98% if iodobenzene (1n) was alternatively used as the starting aryl halide. Cross-couplings of 4a and aniline derivatives 4b, c with 1n and assorted aryl iodides and bromides substituted with a methoxy (1c, 1o), a hydroxy (1p), and a cyano group (1q) proceeded uneventfully as well in the presence of t-BuOK, at 100°C in air, leading to functionalised diarylamines 5ac, 5ao, 5ap, 5aq, 5bn, 5bo, and 5cn in 60–97% yield (Scheme 4). Of note, under the above conditions, the coupling between 2a and aryl chlorides, such as chlorobenzene and 3-chloropyridine proved to be ineffective even after 24 h reaction time.

SCHEME 4

Scheme 4. Synthesis of diarylamines 5 by copper-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of aryl halides 1 with arylamines 4. The yields reported are for products isolated and purified by column chromatography.

The catalyst, the DES and the base could be recycled easily. The amination reaction of bromobenzene 1a with diamine 2a was chosen as a model reaction as it provided almost quantitative yield (98%) of the corresponding adduct 3aa (entry 4, Table 1). Once the stirring was stopped after 12 h reaction time, in-flask extraction with cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) (Watanabe et al., 2007; Azzena et al., 2019) (1 mL), which is an environmentally responsible solvent, afforded product 3aa (98% yield, determined by ¹H NMR, Figure 2, number of cycles = 1), but leaving the active copper species in the eutectic mixture. Then, upon the addition of new, fresh reagents, the catalyst, the DES and the base could be successfully re-used for further reaction runs. As shown in Figure 2, the catalyst remained active over 6 cycles, with a decrease in the final yield of 3aa of up to 2%: 98% (second run), 97% (third run), 97% (fourth run), 97% (fifth run), and 96% (sixth run). In order to compare the reaction rates observed for each run, we re-investigated the above catalytic cycle at a lower conversion. Thus, each run was stopped after 3 h reaction time and the corresponding yield of 3aa calculated: 38% (first, second, and third run), 36% (fourth run), 38% (fifth and sixth run), and 36% (seventh run). Overall, these results confirmed the excellent performance of the copper species as catalyst in the employed eutectic mixture. Finally, to evaluate the sustainability of the proposed protocol and to provide metrics for the “green” aspects herein discussed, we calculated the E-factor (kg of waste/kg of product) (Sheldon, 2007; Roschangar et al., 2015) for the recycling process, obtaining a value as low as 13.8 (10 mol% CuI, 6 cycles, see Supplementary Material for details).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Recycling of CuI, DES, and K₂CO₃ in the coupling reaction between bromobenzene (1a) and N, N-dimethylethylenediamine (2a) with 10 mol% catalyst. The yields were determined by ¹H NMR using CH₂Br₂ as the internal standard.

Conclusion

In summary, a practical and efficient protocol has been developed for performing CuI-catalyzed Ullmann amine synthesis using a biodegradable ChCl-based eutectic mixture as an environmentally responsible reaction medium in place of toxic and hazardous VOCs. Valuable aspects of the proposed protocol are: (a) cross-coupling reactions between (hetero)aryl bromides and iodides and a variety of aromatic and aliphatic primary and secondary amines run under mild conditions (60–100°C) in air, with K₂CO₃ or t-BuOK as the base, and a catalyst loading of CuI of up to 10 mol%; (b) the absence of additional ligands; (c) good reaction efficiency starting from both electron-deficient and electron-rich (hetero)aryl halides; (d) broad substrate scope and tolerance of several functional groups with the expected adducts isolated in up to 98% yield; (e) effective recycling of the DES, the catalyst and the base. Efforts toward targeting and producing medicinally relevant drug compounds on a larger scale are underway and will be reported in due course.

Materials and Methods

General Methods

¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 600 MHz spectrometer and chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (δ). FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 681 spectrometer. GC analyses were performed on a HP 6890 model, Series II by using a HP1 column (methyl siloxane; 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm film thickness). Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on pre-coated 0.25 mm thick plates of Kieselgel 60 F254; visualization was accomplished by UV light (254 nm) or by spraying a solution of 5% (w/v) ammonium molybdate and 0.2% (w/v) cerium(III) sulfate in 100 mL 17.6% (w/v) aq. sulfuric acid and heating to 473 K until blue spots appeared. Chromatography was conducted by using silica gel 60 with a particle size distribution 40–63 μm and 230–400 ASTM. GC-MS analyses were performed on HP 5995C model. Cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) was used as the solvent in the work-up procedures. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses were performed using a Bruker microTOF QII mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source (ESI). CP-OES analysis was performed on a Spectro Arcos FHE 12 (Ametek) spectrometer. Reagents and solvents, unless otherwise specified, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without any further purification. (Hetero)aryl halides and amines used for the synthesis of compounds 3 and 5 are commercially available. Copies of ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra are available in the Supplementary Material. Deep Eutectic Solvents [DES A: L-proline/L-lactic acid (1:2 mol mol⁻¹); DES B: choline chloride/urea (1:2 mol mol⁻¹); DES C: L-proline/glycerol (2:5 mol mol⁻¹); DES D: choline chloride/glycerol (1:2 mol mol⁻¹); DES E: choline chloride/water (1:2 mol mol⁻¹)] were prepared by heating under stirring at 60–80°C for 10–30 min the corresponding individual components until a clear solution was obtained.

Typical Procedure for the Ullmann Cross-Coupling Reaction With Aliphatic Amines: Synthesis of N¹,N¹-dimethyl-N²-phenylethane-1,2-diamine (3aa)

CuI (10 mol%, 0.05 mmol, 10 mg), bromobenzene (1a, 1 equiv, 0.5 mmol, 79 mg, 53 μL), N, N-dimethylethylenediamine (2a, 1 equiv, 0.5 mmol, 44 mg, 55 μL) and the base (K₂CO₃, 2 equiv, 1 mmol, 138 mg) were suspended in 1 g DES (Gly/ChCl, 2:1 mol mol⁻¹), under air, in a vial with a Teflon screw tap under vigorous stirring at 60°C. The reaction mixture was monitored by GC. After 12 h, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and 1 mL of H₂O was added. Then, the mixture was extracted with CPME (3 × 1 mL) and the organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and filtered over a celite pad. Evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure afforded the crude that was purified by flash-chromatography on silica gel (hexane/AcOEt 8:2) to provide the desired product 3aa in 98% yield (80 mg).

N¹,N¹-Dimethyl-N²-phenylethane-1,2-diamine (3aa)

Colorless oil, yield 98%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.27 (s, 6 H), 2.56–2.58 (m, 2 H), 3.16–3.17 (m, 2 H), 6.65 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 6.72 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 42.2, 45.2, 58.1, 112.9, 117.2, 129.2, 148.6.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3379, 3051, 2920, 2821, 1728, 1603, 1505, 1463, 1258, 1041, 748, 700.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 164 (M⁺, 15), 106 (10), 77 (9), 58 (100), 42 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₀H₁₆N₂ + H]⁺: 165.1386; found: 165.1393.

N¹-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-N²,N²-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (3ab)

Colorless oil, yield 75%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.26 (s, 6 H), 2.56 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.12 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.76 (s, 3 H), 6.62 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 6.80 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 42.2, 45.3, 55.9, 58.2, 114.2, 114.9, 143.0, 152.1.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3368, 2942, 1619, 1514, 1464, 1288, 1243, 1179, 1039, 959, 820.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 194 (M⁺, 35), 136 (42), 135 (18), 121 (61), 108 (59), 77 (5), 59 (9), 58 (100), 42 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₁H₁₈N₂O + H]⁺: 195.1492; found: 195.1495.

N¹-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-N²,N²-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (3ac)

Colorless oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.24 (s, 6 H), 2.54 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.12 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 2 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 6.18 (s, 1 H), 6.23–6.26 (m, 2 H), 7.06 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 41.1, 45.1, 55.0, 58.0, 98.7, 102.4, 106.0, 129.9, 149.9, 160.8.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3400, 2924, 2852, 1736, 1602, 1516, 1457, 1378, 1346, 1252, 1179, 1128, 1026, 916, 737.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 194 (M⁺, 30), 136 (36), 135 (16), 92 (5), 59 (9), 58 (100), 42 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₁H₁₈N₂O + H]⁺: 195.1492; found: 195.1493.

N¹-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-N²,N²-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (3ad)

Colorless oil, yield 65%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.29 (s, 6 H), 2.61 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.22 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2 H), 3.86 (s, 3 H), 6.61 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.67 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.77 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.88 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 41.2, 45.3, 55.4, 58.3, 109.4, 109.8, 116.4, 121.2, 138.4, 147.1.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3401, 2926, 2819, 2768, 1602, 1519, 1238, 1130, 733.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 194 (M⁺, 26), 136 (28), 121 (16), 120 (23), 77 (6), 65 (6), 58 (100), 42(8). HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₁H₁₈N₂O + H]⁺: 195.1492; found: 195.1493.

N¹,N¹-Dimethyl-N²-(4-nitrophenyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (3ae)

Yellow oil, yield 90%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.26 (s, 6 H), 2.54–2.57 (m, 2 H), 3.15–3.16 (m, 2 H), 4.94 (br. s, 1 H), 6.56 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 40.0, 44.8, 57.1, 111.1, 130.0, 137.9, 153.3.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3369, 2920, 1601, 1466, 1307, 1111, 838.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 209 (M⁺, 22), 120 (5), 76 (6), 58 (100), 51 (8), 42 (7).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₀H₁₅N₃O₂ + H]⁺: 210.1237; found: 210.1239.

4-{[2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl]amino}benzonitrile (3af)

Colorless oil, yield 80%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.27 (s, 6 H), 2.57–2.59 (m, 2 H), 3.15–3.18 (m, 2 H), 4.97 (br. s, 1 H), 6.56 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 40.1, 45.0, 57.3, 98.4, 112.2, 120.6, 133.7, 151.5.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3367, 2922, 2855, 2777, 2212, 1721, 1669, 1608, 1526, 1469, 1338, 1173, 1132, 1041, 825, 732.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 189 (M⁺, 6), 102 (6), 58 (100), 42 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₁H₁₅N₃ + H]⁺: 190.1339; found: 190.1341.

Ethyl 4-{[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]amino}benzoate (3ag)

Yellow oil, yield 90%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.11 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3 H), 2.26 (s, 6 H), 2.53–2.57 (m, 2 H), 3.18–3.19 (m, 2 H), 4.33–4.41 (m, 2 H), 6.56–6.58 (m, 2 H), 7.86–7.88 (m, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 14.5, 40.3, 45.0, 57.6, 60.1, 111.5, 118.4, 131.5, 152.0, 167.0

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3395, 2922, 2852, 1682, 1607, 1464, 1341, 1276, 1110, 1041, 839, 700.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 136 (M⁺, 6), 191 (6), 150 (6), 105 (7), 58 (100).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₂₀N₂O₂ + H]⁺: 237.1598; found: 237.1600.

3-{[2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl]amino}phenol (3ah)

Yellow oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.26 (s, 6 H), 2.55–2.57 (m, 2 H), 3.14–3.15 (m, 2 H), 6.12 (s, 1 H), 6.16 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.02 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 41.0, 45.1, 57.9, 99.7, 104.4, 105.8, 134.8, 149.9, 156.7.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3368, 2928, 1605, 1463, 1261, 1047.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 180 (M⁺, 16), 122 (10), 65 (6), 58 (100), 42 (7).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₀H₁₆N₂O + H]⁺: 181.1335; found: 181.1336.

N¹-(Isoquinolin-4-yl)-N²,N²-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (3ai)

Colorless oil, yield 75%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.38 (s, 6 H), 2.80–2.81 (m, 2 H), 3.39–3.40 (m, 2 H), 5.27 (br. s, 1 H), 7.58–7.61 (m, 1 H), 7.66–7.69 (m, 1 H), 7.85–7.86 (m, 2 H), 7.91–7.92 (m, 1 H), 8.70 (s, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 46.6, 47.3, 60.3, 121.7, 124.6, 126.5, 126.9, 128.3, 128.9, 129.8, 134.2, 140.3.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3391, 2918, 1724, 1651, 1583, 1407, 1285, 1121, 1040, 842, 751.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 215 (M⁺, 15), 157 (8), 128 (6), 101 (5), 58 (100), 42 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₁₇N₃ + H]⁺: 216.1495; found: 216.1500.

N¹,N¹-Dimethyl-N²-(pyridin-3-yl)ethane-1,2-diamine (3aj)

Yellow oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.27 (s, 6 H), 2.57–2.59 (m, 2 H), 3.14–3.15 (m, 2 H), 4.37 (br. s, 1 H), 6.88–6.90 (m, 1 H), 7.09–7.10 (m, 1 H), 7.97–7.98 (m, 1 H), 8.07 (s, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 40.6, 45.1, 57.7, 118.6, 123.7, 136.1, 138.6, 144.5.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3335, 2924, 2855, 1652, 1592, 1470, 1421, 1302, 1248, 1192, 1133, 1042, 874, 797, 709.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 165 (M⁺, 8), 107 (5), 78 (6), 58 (100), 51 (5), 42 (8).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₉H₁₅N₃ + H]⁺: 166.1339; found: 166.1339.

N¹,N¹-Dimethyl-N²-(pyridin-2-yl)ethane-1,2-diamine (3ak)

Yellow oil, yield 98%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.27 (s, 6 H), 2.54–2.56 (m, 2 H), 3.34–3.36 (m, 2 H), 5.01 (br. s, 1 H), 6.41 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.56 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 8.09–8.10 (m, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 39.4, 45.2, 58.0, 107.4, 112.6, 137.2, 148.0, 158.8.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3325, 2956, 2926, 2855, 1667, 1455, 1152, 769, 734.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 165 (M⁺, 8), 107 (5), 95 (6), 78 (6), 71 (9), 58 (100), 51 (5), 42 (8).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₉H₁₅N₃ + H]⁺: 166.1339; found: 166.1342.

N¹,N¹-Diethyl-N²-(3-methoxyphenyl)ethane-1,2-diamine (3bc)

Colorless oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.03 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6 H), 2.56 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 4 H), 2.69 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.13 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.19 (s, 1 H), 6.25–6.27 (m, 3 H), 7.07 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 11.7, 29.7, 46.7, 55.1, 55.4, 102.4, 106.2, 113.8, 123.0, 149.0, 150.1.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3380, 2962, 2925, 2852, 1732, 1614, 1585, 1504, 1474, 1425, 1381, 1285, 1243, 1229, 1211, 1161, 1034, 989.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 222 (M⁺, 13), 136 (9), 92 (6), 86 (100), 58 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₂₂N₂O + H]⁺: 223.1805; found: 223.1808.

N¹,N¹-Diethyl-N²-(pyridin-2-yl)ethane-1,2-diamine (3bk)

Colorless oil, yield 97%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.03 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6 H), 2.56–2.59 (m, 4 H), 2.68–2.70 (m, 2 H), 3.32–3.33 (m, 2 H), 5.15 (br. s, 1 H), 6.41 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 6.54 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 8.10–8.11 (m, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 11.6, 39.4, 46.7, 51.6, 107.4, 112.6, 137.2, 148.0, 158.9.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3322, 2954, 1668, 1454, 1152, 770, 732.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 193 (M⁺, 11), 135 (6), 95 (6), 86 (100), 51 (5), 42 (8).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₁H₁₉N₃ + H]⁺: 194.1652; found: 194.1653.

N-Heptylaniline (3ca)

Yellow oil, yield 97%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.89–0.91 (m, 3 H), 1.30–1.41 (m, 6 H), 1.60–1.65 (m, 4 H), 3.11 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.49 (br. s, 1 H), 6.61 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.70 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.18 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 14.1, 22.6, 27.1, 29.1, 29.6, 31.8, 44.0, 112.7, 115.9, 129.2, 148.7.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3400, 3010, 2850, 1678, 1450, 650, 780.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 191 (M⁺, 15), 107 (7), 106 (100), 77 (10).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₂₁N + H]⁺: 192.1747; found: 192.1749.

N-Heptylpyridin-2-amine (3ck)

Colorless oil, yield 98%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.89–0.91 (m, 3 H), 1.30–1.42 (m, 6 H), 1.61–1.65 (m, 4 H), 3.25–3.26 (m, 2 H), 4.49 (br. s, 1 H), 6.41–6.42 (m, 1 H), 6.58–6.59 (m, 1 H), 7.42–7.45 (m, 1 H), 8.11–8.12 (m, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 14.0, 22.6, 27.0, 29.1, 30.9, 31.8, 42.2, 105.6, 115.8, 137.3, 148.4, 159.0.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3326, 2926, 1668, 1604, 1515, 1455, 1377, 1289, 769.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 192 (M⁺, 13), 176 (5), 121 (26), 108 (23), 107 (100), 94 (38), 78 (26), 41 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₂H₂₀N₂ + H]⁺: 193.1699; found: 193.1670.

N-Phenethylaniline (3da)

Colorless oil, yield 85%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.93 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.41 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2 H), 3.68 (br. s, 1 H), 6.61–6.64 (m, 2 H), 6.70–6.73 (m, 1 H), 7.16–7.21 (m, 2 H), 7.23–7.25 (m, 3 H), 7.31–7.34 (m, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 35.5, 45.0, 113.0, 117.5, 126.4, 128.6, 128.8, 129.3, 139.3, 148.0.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3408, 3025, 2927, 2860, 1601, 1505, 1475, 1319, 1179, 1079, 1029, 869, 747.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 197 (M⁺, 12), 107 (8), 106 (100), 91 (8), 77 (18), 65 (5), 51 (5).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₄H₁₅N + H]⁺: 198.1277; found: 198.1278.

N-Cyclohexyl-4-methoxyaniline (3eb)

White solid, m.p. 41–42°C, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.01–1.37 (m, 4 H), 1.60–2.06 (m, 6 H), 3.47–3.50 (m, 1 H), 3.75 (s, 3 H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.8, 2 H), 6.76 (d, J = 8.8, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 25.1, 26.0, 33.7, 52.8, 55.9, 114.9₁, 114.9₃, 141.6, 151.8.

FT-IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3344, 3039, 3012, 2929, 2851, 1845, 1617, 1588, 1515, 1468, 1445, 1410, 1365, 1291, 1244, 1227, 1184, 1145, 1117, 1092, 1033, 977, 886, 819, 753, 650, 624, 557, 511, 466.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 205 (M⁺, 66), 163 (12), 162 (100), 149 (17), 134 (13), 108 (22), 77 (5), 55 (5), 41 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₁₉NO + H]⁺: 206.1539; found: 206.1540.

N-Cyclohexylpyridin-2-amine (3ek)

White solid, m.p. 106–107°C, yield 53%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.32–1.40 (m, 3 H), 1.54–1.63 (m, 3 H), 1.85–1.88 (m, 3 H), 1.99–2.00 (m, 2 H), 3.50–3.51 (m, 1 H), 6.69–6.75 (m, 1 H), 6.78–6.81 (m, 1 H), 7.75–7.79 (m, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 24.3, 25.1, 32.1, 51.7, 108.0, 111.0, 136.3, 143.7, 153.0.

FT-IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3265, 3143, 3091, 3069, 3020, 2924, 2852, 1610, 1573, 1520, 1486, 1452, 1416, 1362, 1345, 1285, 1251, 1227, 1152, 1116, 1095, 987, 974, 891, 861, 766, 731, 682, 580, 524.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 176 (M⁺, 48), 147 (11), 133 (44), 120 (10), 119 (100), 107 (8), 98 (9), 95 (12), 79 (11), 67 (12), 52 (5), 41 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₁H₁₆N₂ + H]⁺: 177.1386; found: 177.1387.

1-[2-(Cyclohexylamino)phenyl]ethan-1-one (3el)

Colorless oil, yield 60%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.28–1.41 (m, 5 H), 1.62–1.64 (m, 1 H), 1.78–1.80 (m, 2 H), 2.01–2.02 (m, 2 H), 2.58 (s, 3 H), 3.42–3.46 (m, 1 H), 6.53 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.32 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 24.5, 25.8, 29.6, 32.7, 50.3, 112.1, 113.3, 117.2, 132.9, 134.8, 150.2, 200.6.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3290, 2927, 2851, 1607, 1574, 1519, 1459, 1421, 1333, 1258, 1230, 1161, 1098, 1036, 952, 888, 802, 744.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 217 (M⁺, 90), 202 (36), 200 (24), 188 (11), 174 (24), 162 (15), 160 (269), 146 (19), 136 883), 121 (14), 120 (100), 107 (11), 97 (14), 91 (42), 65 (18), 55 (24), 41 (22).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₄H₁₉NO + H]⁺: 218.1539; found: 218.1540.

N,N-Dibutylpyridin-2-amine (3fk)

Colorless liquid, yield 80%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 0.95 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6 H), 1.33–1.38 (m, 4 H), 1.56–1.60 (m, 4 H), 3.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4 H), 6.41–6.46 (m, 2 H), 7.36–7.39 (m, 1 H), 8.11–8.12 (m, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 14.2, 20.3, 29.9, 48.8, 105.6, 110.5, 136.9, 148.1, 157.7.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3370, 2923, 2852, 1738, 1596, 1463, 1376.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 206 (30), 177 (9), 163 (51), 149 (18), 121 (100), 119 (10), 107 (81),78 (31), 41 (10).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₂₂N₂ + H]⁺: 207.1856; found: 207.1857.

4-Phenylmorpholine (3ga)

Colorless solid, m.p. 51–52°C, yield 90%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 3.17–3.18 (m, 4 H) 3.87–3.89 (m, 4 H), 6.89–6.94 (m, 2 H), 7.25–7.32 (m, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 49.2, 67.8, 115.8, 120.1, 129.4, 151.6.

FT-IR (KBr, cm⁻¹) 3057, 3023, 3002, 2962, 2888, 2855, 2825, 2761, 2687, 1973, 1598, 1494, 1447, 1376, 1298, 1260, 1228, 1176, 1119, 1064, 1049, 1031, 990, 924, 858, 772, 698, 636, 519.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 163 (M⁺, 53), 132 (6), 105 (100), 104 (43), 77 (27), 51 (8).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₀H₁₃NO + H]⁺: 164.1070; found: 164.1071.

4-(Pyridin-2-yl)morpholine (3gk)

Colorless oil, yield 90%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 3.51–3.52 (m, 4 H), 3.83–3.85 (m, 4 H), 6.64–6.68 (m, 2 H), 7.49–7.52 (m, 1 H), 8.21–8.22 (m, 1 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 45.6, 66.7, 106.9, 113.7, 137.4, 147.9, 159.6.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3476, 2962, 2892, 2852, 1722, 1593, 1563, 1481, 1436, 1376, 1333, 1311, 1242, 1160, 1120, 1069, 950, 942, 855, 775, 734, 645, 615, 528, 457.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 164 (M⁺, 36), 163 (28), 119 (23), 107 (39), 106 (14), 79 (100), 78 (27), 52 (12), 51 (12).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₉H₁₂N₂O + H]⁺: 165.1022; found: 165.1021.

Typical Procedure for the Ullmann Cross-Coupling Reaction With Aromatic Amines: Synthesis of Diphenylamine 5aa

CuI (10 mol%, 0.05 mmol, 10 mg), iodobenzene (1n, 1 equiv, 0.5 mmol, 102 mg, 57 μL), aniline (4a, 1 equiv, 0.5 mmol, 47 mg, 46 μL) and the base (t-BuOK, 2 equiv, 1 mmol, 112 mg) were suspended in 1 g DES (Gly/ChCl, 2:1 mol mol⁻¹), under air, in a vial with a Teflon screw tap under vigorous stirring at 100°C. The reaction was monitored by GC. Then, the mixture was extracted with CPME (3 × 1 mL) and the organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄ and filtered over a celite pad. Evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure afforded the crude that was purified by flash-chromatography on silica gel (hexane/AcOEt 8:2) to provide the desired product 5aa in 98% yield (83 mg).

Diphenylamine (5aa)

White solid, 98%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 5.70 (br. s, 1 H), 6.93–6.96 (m, 2 H), 7.08–7.10 (m, 4 H), 7.27–7.29 (m, 4 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 117.8, 121.0, 129.3, 143.2.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3380, 3034, 1583, 1489, 739, 685.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 169 (M⁺, 100), 168 (64), 167 (36), 141 (5), 115 (6), 77 (8), 65 (6), 51 (9).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₂H₁₁ + H]⁺: 170.0964; found: 170.0965.

3-Methoxy-N-phenylaniline (5ac)

Yellow oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 3.80 (s, 3 H), 5.74 (br. s, 1 H), 6.50–6.53 (m, 1 H), 6.66–6.68 (m, 2 H), 6.95–6.98 (m, 1 H), 7.11–7.12 (m, 2 H), 7.17–7.20 (m, 1 H), 7.27–7.31 (m, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 55.2, 103.3, 106.2, 110.2, 118.4, 121.3, 129.4, 130.1, 142.8, 144.6, 160.7.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3379, 3029, 1638, 1517, 1464, 1296, 1177, 870.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 199 (M⁺, 100), 183 (9), 168 (16), 167 (13), 156 (7), 155 (8), 128 (12), 51 (7).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₁₃NO + H]⁺: 200.1070; found: 200.1071.

4-Methoxy-N-phenylaniline (5ao)

Yellow oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 3.81 (s, 3 H), 4.69 (br. s, 1 H), 6.86–6.88 (m, 3 H), 6.91–6.93 (m, 2 H), 7.08–7.10 (m, 2 H), 7.21–7.24 (m, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 55.6, 114.7, 115.7, 119.6, 122.2, 129.3, 130.9, 135.8, 145.1.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3408, 2936, 2834, 1590, 1512, 1495, 1464, 1419, 1295, 1231, 1176, 1114, 1025, 908.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 199 (M⁺, 64), 185 (13), 184 (100), 154 (10), 129 (10), 128 (13), 78 (11), 51 (7).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₃H₁₃NO + H]⁺: 200.1070; found: 200.1073.

3-Hydroxydiphenylamine (5ap)

Brown solid, m. p. 70°C, yield 90%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 5.33 (br. s, 1 H), 5.71 (br. s, 1 H), 6.39–6.40 (m, 1 H), 6.58–6.62 (m, 2 H), 6.94–6.97 (m, 1 H), 7.09–7.12 (m, 3 H), 7.26–7.29 (m, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 104.0, 107.7, 110.0, 118.7, 121.5, 129.3, 130.3, 142.6, 145.0, 156.6.

FT-IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3378, 1599, 1507, 1457, 1412, 1318, 1238, 1102, 822, 744, 693, 511.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 185 (M⁺, 100), 166 (10), 156 (9), 154 (8), 129 (6), 77 (7).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₂H₁₁NO + H]⁺: 186.0913; found: 186.0914.

2-Methyl-5-(phenylamino)benzonitrile (5aq)

Yellow oil, yield 70%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.48 (s, 3 H), 6.98–7.07 (m, 3 H), 7.14–7.19 (m, 2 H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 3 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 19.6, 114.6, 118.7, 120.0, 121.3, 121.9, 122.3, 129.6, 131.2, 133.7, 141.9.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3368, 2918, 1605, 1463, 1261, 1047.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 208 (M⁺ 100), 207 (56), 192 (17), 152 (5), 103 (5), 77 (10), 51 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₄H₁₂N₂ + H]⁺: 209.1073; found: 209.1074.

4-Ethyl-N-phenylaniline (5bn)

Yellow solid, m.p.: 86–87, yield 90%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.22 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 2.62 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 5.63 (br. s, 1 H), 6.89 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.03–7.05 (m, 4 H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 15.3, 29.7, 117.0, 118.8, 120.3, 128.7, 129.3, 134.5, 141.4, 144.3.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3393, 3052, 3032, 2962, 2924, 2869, 1596, 1514, 1442, 1400, 1313, 1235, 1173, 1115, 1075, 1046, 1028, 994, 876, 847, 818, 743, 692, 615, 549, 506.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 197 (M⁺, 43), 183 (15), 182 (100), 180 (7), 167 (12), 90 (5), 77 (8).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₄H₁₅N + H]⁺: 198.1277; found: 198.1278.

4-Ethyl-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)aniline (5bo)

Colorless oil, yield 97%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.22 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3 H), 2.58 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 5.40 (br. s, 1 H), 6.85–6.89 (m, 4 H), 7.03–7.07 (m, 4 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 15.8, 28.0, 55.6, 114.7, 116.5, 121.2, 128.6, 135.9, 136.6, 142.6, 154.8.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3390, 2924, 2853, 1613, 1463, 1295, 1243, 1180, 1038, 821.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 227 (M⁺, 62), 213 (16), 212 (100), 197 (10), 168 (11), 77 (5).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₅H₁₇NO + H]⁺: 228.1383; found: 228.1384.

3,5-Dimethyl-N-phenylaniline (5cn)

Yellow oil, yield 60%.

¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 2.29 (s, 6 H), 5.62 (br. s, 1 H), 6.61 (s, 1 H), 6.73 (s, 2 H), 6.93 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H).

¹³C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 21.4, 115.6, 117.9, 120.8, 122.9, 129.3, 139.0, 143.1, 143.3.

FT-IR (film, cm⁻¹): 3383, 3025, 2914, 1583, 1516, 1496, 1327, 1265, 1169, 1081, 1034, 992, 878, 843.

GC/MS (70 eV) m/z (%): 197 (M⁺, 100), 181 (21), 180 (16), 167 (11), 164 (8), 121 (18), 120 (10), 106 (11), 91 (8), 77 (14), 65 (6).

HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for [C₁₄H₁₅N + H]⁺: 198.1277; found: 198.1278.

Recycling of Cu Catalyst, DES and Base in the Coupling Reaction Between Bromobenzene (1a) and N,N-dimethylethylenediamine (2a) to Prepare 3aa. Typical Procedure

CuI (10 mol%, 0.05 mmol, 10 mg), bromobenzene (1a, 1 equiv, 0.5 mmol, 79 mg, 53 μL), N, N-dimethylethylenediamine (2a, 1 equiv, 0.5 mmol, 44 mg, 55 μL) and the base (K₂CO₃, 2 equiv, 1 mmol, 138 mg) were sequentially added in 1.0 g DES (Gly/ChCl, 2:1 mol mol⁻¹), under air, in a vial with a Teflon screw tap. The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at 60°C for 12 h (monitoring the complete consumption of the starting material by GC), and then cooled to room temperature. The product was extracted with CPME (1 mL) leaving the catalyst and the base in the eutectic mixture, which was re-used for further reaction runs. The organic layer was filtered through a celite pad, the volatile was evaporated under vacuum, and the crude so obtained was analyzed by ¹H NMR to determine the yield of 3aa (CH₂Br₂ was used as the internal standard). New, fresh reagents were then added to the recovered eutectic mixture, and the whole procedure was repeated for five times without any significant loss of the catalyst activity (96% yield after the sixth cycle) (see Figure 2). By analyzing the Cu amount in the CPME extract phase by ICP-OES, we conclude that up to 2% of the total amount of copper in the catalyst was lost during each extraction process.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

AQ undertook all the synthetic experimental works. AQ and FP analyzed and collected experimental data. VC directed the project. PV, FP, and VC supervised the synthetic chemistry works. PV and FP carried out the characterization chemistry works. VC analyzed and drafted the manuscript, while AQ, PV, FP, and VC contributed to the discussion, to the writing, and the review.

Funding

This work was carried out within the framework of the Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Innovazione (PON RI 2014/2020), Axis I Investments in Human Capital, Action I.1.—Innovative Ph.D.s with industrial characterization, funding FSE-FESR (D.D. n. 1377 on 5/6/2017), and was financially supported by the national PRIN project “Unlocking Sustainable Technologies Through Nature-Inspired Solvents” (Code: 2017A5HXFC_002), by the Interuniversity Consortium C.I.N.M.P.I.S., and by the University of Bari Aldo Moro (codes: CapriatiV.FABR2018SFARMA, PernaF.FABR2018SFARMA, PernaF.18 FondiAteneo15-16, VitaleP.18 FondiAteno15-16, VitaleP.FABR2018SFARMA).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Galatea Trotta for her contribution to the experimental work, and are also indebted to Professor Francesco Sannicolò (Laboratori Alchemia srl, Milan) for valuable discussions and comments, to Zeon Europe GmbH for the generous gift of a sample of CPME, and to Dr. Natale I. Volpicella and Dr. Damiano A. P. Manigrassi of AER Consulting for performing ICP-OES analysis.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2019.00723/full#supplementary-material

References

Alonso, D. A., Baeza, A., Chinchilla, R., Guillena, G., Pastor, I. M., and Ramón, D. J. (2016). Deep eutectic solvents: the organic reaction medium of the century. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 612–632. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201501197

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Azzena, U., Carraro, M., Pisano, L., Monticelli, S., Bartolotta, R., and Pace, V. (2019). Cyclopentyl methyl ether: an elective ecofriendly ethereal solvent in classical and modern organic chemistry. ChemSusChem 12, 40–70. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201801768

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beletskaya, I. P., and Ananikov, V. P. (2011). Transition-metal-catalyzed C–S, C–Se, and C–Te bond formation via cross-coupling and atom-economic addition reactions. Chem. Rev. 111, 1596–1636. doi: 10.1021/cr100347k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calò, V., Nacci, A., Monopoli, A., and Cotugno, P. (2009). Palladium-nanoparticle-catalysed Ullmann reactions in ionic liquids with aldehydes as the reductants: scope and mechanism. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 1272–1279. doi: 10.1002/chem.200801621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casitas, A., and Ribas, X. (2013). The role of organometallic copper(III) complexes in homogeneous catalysis. Chem. Sci. 4, 2301–2318. doi: 10.1039/c3sc21818j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chakraborti, G., Paladhi, S., Mandal, T., and Dash, J. (2018). “On water” promoted Ullmann-type C–N bond-forming reactions: application to carbazole alkaloids by selective N-arylation of aminophenols. J. Org. Chem. 83, 7347–7359. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b03020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y.-J., and Chen, H.-H. (2006). 1,1,1-Tris(hydroxymethyl)ethane as a new, efficient, and versatile tripod ligand for copper-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of aryl iodides with amides, thiols, and phenols. Org. Lett. 8, 5609–5612. doi: 10.1021/ol062339h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, J., Tang, L., and Xu, J. (2010). An economical, green pathway to biaryls: palladium nanoparticles catalyzed Ullmann reaction in ionic liquid/supercritical carbon dioxide system. Adv. Synth. Catal. 352, 3275–3286. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201000475

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cicco, L, Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., Perna, F. M., García-Álvarez, J., and Capriati, V. (2017). One-pot sustainable synthesis of tertiary alcohols by combining ruthenium-catalysed isomerisation of allylic alcohols and chemoselective addition of polar organometallic reagents in deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem. 19, 3069–3077. doi: 10.1039/C7GC00458C

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cicco, L., Ríos-Lombardía, N., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., Morís, F., Perna, F. M., Capriati, V., et al. (2018). Programming cascade reactions interfacing biocatalysis with transition-metal catalysis in deep eutectic solvents as biorenewable reaction media. Green Chem. 20, 3468–3475. doi: 10.1039/C8GC00861B

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cicco, L., Sblendorio, S., Mansueto, R., Perna, F. M., Salomone, A., Florio, S., et al. (2016). Water opens the door to organolithiums and Grignard reagents: exploring and comparing the reactivity of highly polar organometallic compounds in unconventional reaction media towards the synthesis of tetrahydrofurans. Chem. Sci. 7, 1192–1199. doi: 10.1039/C5SC03436A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cristau, H.-J., Cellier, P. P., Spindler, J.-F., and Taillefer, M. (2004). Highly efficient and mild copper-catalyzed N- and C-arylations with aryl bromides and iodides. Chem. Eur. J. 10, 5607–5622. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400582

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cristau, H.-J., Ouali, A., Spindler, J.-F., and Taillefer, M. (2005). Mild and efficient copper-catalyzed cyanation of aryl iodides and bromides. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 2483–2492. doi: 10.1002/chem.200400979

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Meijere, A., and Diederich, F. (2004). Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi: 10.1002/9783527619535

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dilauro, G., Dell'Aera, M., Vitale, P., Capriati, V., and Perna, F. M. (2017). Unprecedented nucleophilic additions of highly polar organometallic compounds to imines and nitriles using water as a non-innocent reaction medium. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56, 10200–10203. doi: 10.1002/anie.201705412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dilauro, G., Garcia, S. M., Tagarelli, D., Vitale, P., Perna, F. M., and Capriati, V. (2018). Ligand-free bioinspired Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reactions using aryltrifluoroborates as effective partners in deep eutectic solvents. ChemSusChem. 11, 3495–3501. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201801382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dilauro, G., Quivelli, A. F., Vitale, P., Capriati, V., and Perna, F. M. (2019). Water and sodium chloride: essential ingredients for robust and fast Pd-catalysed cross-coupling reactions between organolithium reagents and (hetero)aryl halides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 58, 1799–1802. doi: 10.1002/anie.201812537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Durán Pachón, L., Elsevier, C. J., and Rothenberg, G. (2006). Electroreductive palladium-catalysed Ullmann reactions in ionic liquids: scope and mechanism. Adv. Synth. Catal. 348, 1705–1710. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200606132

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Evano, G., Blanchard, N., and Toumi, M. (2008). Copper-mediated coupling reactions and their applications in natural products and designed biomolecules synthesis. Chem. Rev. 108, 3054–3131. doi: 10.1021/cr8002505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferlin, F., Trombettoni, V., Luciani, L., Fusi, S., Piermatti, O., Santoro, S., et al. (2018). A waste-minimized protocol for copper-catalyzed Ullmann-type reaction in a biomass derived furfuryl alcohol/water azeotrope. Green Chem. 20, 1634–1639. doi: 10.1039/C8GC00287H

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, J., Bhunia, S., Wang, K., Gan, L., Xia, S., and Ma, D. (2017). Discovery of N-(naphthalen-1-yl)-N′-alkyl oxalamide ligands enables Cu-catalyzed aryl amination with high turnovers. Org. Lett. 19, 2809–2812. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

García-Álvarez, J. (2015). Deep eutectic mixtures: promising sustainable solvents for metal-catalysed and metal-mediated organic reactions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 5147–5157. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201500892

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

García-Álvarez, J., Hevia, E., and Capriati, V. (2015). Reactivity of polar organometallic compounds in unconventional reaction media: challenges and opportunities. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 6779–6799. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201500757

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

García-Álvarez, J., Hevia, E., and Capriati, V. (2018). The future of polar organometallic chemistry written in bio-based solvents and water. Chem. Eur. J. 24, 14854–14863. doi: 10.1002/chem.201802873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ge, X., Zhang, S., Chen, X., Liu, X., and Qian, C. (2019). A designed bi-functional sugar-based surfactant: micellar catalysis for C–X coupling reaction in water. Green Chem. 21, 2771–2776. doi: 10.1039/C9GC00964G

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghinato, S., Dilauro, G., Perna, F. M., Capriati, V., Blangetti, M., and Prandi, C. (2019). Directed ortho-metalation–nucleophilic acyl substitution strategies in deep eutectic solvents: the organolithium base dictates the chemoselectivity. Chem. Commun. 55, 7741–7744. doi: 10.1039/C9CC03927A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giri, R., and Hartwig, J. F. (2010). Cu(I)-Amido complexes in the Ullmann reaction: reactions of Cu(I)-amido complexes with iodoarenes with and without autocatalysis by CuI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15860–15863. doi: 10.1021/ja105695s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goldberg, I. (1906). Ueber Phenylirungen bei Gegenwart von Kupfer als Katalysator. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 39, 1691–1692. doi: 10.1002/cber.19060390298

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hartwig, J. F. (1998). Carbon-heteroatom bond-forming reductive eliminations of amines, ethers, and sulfides. Acc. Chem. Res. 31, 852–860. doi: 10.1021/ar970282g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hartwig, J. F. (2000). Modern Amination Methods. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.

Google Scholar

Hayyan, M., Hashim, M. A., Hayyan, A., Al-Saadi, M. A., AlNashef, I. M., Mirghani, M. E., et al. (2013). Are deep eutectic solvents benign or toxic? Chemosphere 90, 2193–2195. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hayyan, M., Looi, C. Y., Hayyan, A., Wong, W. F., and Hashim, M. A. (2015). In vitro and in vivo toxicity profiling of ammonium-based deep eutectic solvents. PLoS ONE 10:e117934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hayyan, M., Mbous, Y. P., Looi, C. Y., Wong, W. F., Hayyan, A., Salleh, Z., et al. (2016). Natural deep eutectic solvents: cytotoxic profile. SpringerPlus 29:913. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2575-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, L., Hu, R., Zhu, X., and Wan, Y. (2013). A recyclable Cu-catalyzed C–N coupling reaction in water and its application to synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]quinoxaline. Tetrahedron 69, 8974–8977. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.07.036

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Xu, L., Zhou, C., and Ma, D. (2013). “Cu-catalyzed Ullmann-type C–heteroatom bond formation: the key role of dinucleating ancillary ligands,” in C-H and C-X Bond Functionalization: Transition Metal Mediation, ed X. Ribas (Cambridge: RSC Publishing), 1–45. doi: 10.1039/9781849737166-00001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiao, J., Zhang, X. R., Chang, N. H., Wang, J., Wei, J. F., Shi, X. Y., et al. (2011). A facile and practical copper powder-catalyzed, organic solvent- and ligand-free Ullmann amination of aryl halides. J. Org. Chem. 76, 1180–1183. doi: 10.1021/jo102169t

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, C. P., Anderson, K. W., and Buchwald, S. L. (2007). Sequential Cu-catalyzed amidation-base-mediated camps cyclization: a two-step synthesis of 2-aryl-4-quinolones from o-halophenones. J. Org. Chem. 72, 7968–7973. doi: 10.1021/jo701384n

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Yang, D., Jiang, Y., and Fu, H. (2010). Efficient copper-catalyzed N-arylations of nitrogen-containing heterocycles and aliphatic amines in water. Green Chem. 12, 1097–1105. doi: 10.1039/c002172e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lipshutz, B. H., Gallou, F., and Handa, S. (2016). Evolution of solvents in organic chemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4, 5838–5849. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01810

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lipshutz, B. H., and Ghorai, S. (2014). Transitioning organic synthesis from organic solvents to water. What's your E factor? Green Chem. 16, 3660–3679. doi: 10.1039/C4GC00503A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, P., Hao, J.-W., Mo, L.-P., and Zhang, Z.-H. (2015). Recent advances in the application of deep eutectic solvents as sustainable media as well as catalysts in organic reactions. RSC Adv. 5, 48685–48704. doi: 10.1039/C5RA05746A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, S., and Zhou, J. (2013). Aqueous copper-catalyzed N-arylation of indoles: the surfactant strategy. New J. Chem. 37, 2537–2540. doi: 10.1039/c3nj00226h

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, D., and Cai, Q. (2008). Copper/amino acid catalyzed cross-couplings of aryl and vinyl halides with nucleophiles. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1450–1460. doi: 10.1021/ar8000298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mallardo, V., Rizzi, R., Sassone, F. C., Mansueto, R., Perna, F. M., Salomone, A., et al. (2014). Regioselective desymmetrization of diaryltetrahydrofurans via directed ortho-lithiation: an unexpected help from green chemistry. Chem. Commun. 50, 8655–8658. doi: 10.1039/C4CC03149K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mancuso, R., Maner, A., Cicco, L., Perna, F. M., Capriati, V., and Gabriele, B. (2016). Synthesis of thiophenes in a deep eutectic solvent: heterocyclodehydration and iodocyclization of 1-mercapto-3-yn-2-ols in a choline chloride/glycerol medium. Tetrahedron 72, 4239–4244. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2016.05.062

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martins, M. A. R., Pinho, S. P., and Coutinho, J. A. P. (2018). Insights into the nature of eutectic and deep eutectic mixtures. J. Solut. Chem. 48, 962–982. doi: 10.1007/s10953-018-0793-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Messa, F., Perrone, S., Capua, M., Tolomeo, F., Troisi, L., Capriati, V., et al. (2018). Towards a sustainable synthesis of amides: chemoselective palladium-catalysed aminocarbonylation of aryl iodides in deep eutectic solvents. Chem. Commun. 54, 8100–8103. doi: 10.1039/C8CC03858A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monnier, F., and Taillefer, M. (2009). Catalytic C-C, C-N, and C-O Ullmann-type coupling reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6954–6971. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pant, P. L., Sonune, R. K., and Shankarling, G. S. (2018). Choline hydroxide promoted synthesis of N-aryl anthraquinone derivatives: metal free approach to Ullmann coupling reactions. ChemistrySelect 3, 5249–5253. doi: 10.1002/slct.201800546

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pinto-Basto, D., Silva, J. P., Queiroz, M.-J. R. P., Moreno, A. J., and Coutinho, O. P. (2009). Antioxidant activity of synthetic diarylamines: A mitochondrial and cellular approach. Mitochondrion 9, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2008.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ribas, X., and Güell, I. (2014). Cu(I)/Cu(III) catalytic cycle involved in Ullmann-type cross-coupling reactions. Pure Appl. Chem. 86, 345–336. doi: 10.1515/pac-2013-1104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roschangar, F., Sheldon, R. A., and Senenayake, C. (2015). Overcoming barriers to green chemistry in the pharmaceutical industry – the Green Aspiration Level™ concept. Green Chem. 17, 752–768. doi: 10.1039/C4GC01563K

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruß, C., and König, B. (2012). Low melting mixtures in organic synthesis – an alternative to ionic liquids? Green Chem. 14, 2969–2982. doi: 10.1039/c2gc36005e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sambiagio, C., Marsden, S. P., Blacker, A. J., and McGowan, P. C. (2014). Copper catalysed Ullmann type chemistry: from mechanistic aspects to modern development. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 3525–3550. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60289C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sánchez-Condado, A., Carriedo, G. A., Presa Soto, A., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., García-Álvarez, J., and Hevia, E. (2019). Organolithium-initiated polymerization of olefins in deep eutectic solvents under aerobic conditions. ChemSusChem. 12, 3134–3143. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201900533

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sassone, F.C., Perna, F. M., Salomone, A., Florio, S., and Capriati, V. (2015). Unexpected lateral-lithiation-induced alkylative ring opening of tetrahydrofurans in deep eutectic solvents: synthesis of functionalised primary alcohols. Chem. Commun. 51, 9459–9462. doi: 10.1039/C5CC02884A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seechurn, C. C. C. J., Kitching, M. O., Colacot, T. J., and Snieckus, V. (2012). Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling: a historical contextual perspective to the 2010 nobel prize. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5062–5085. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaabani, A., and Afshari, R. (2018). Magnetic Ugi-functionalized graphene oxide complexed with copper nanoparticles: efficient catalyst toward Ullman coupling reaction in deep eutectic solvents. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 510, 384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shafir, A., and Buchwald, S. L. (2006). Highly Selective room-temperature copper-catalyzed C–N coupling reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8742–8743. doi: 10.1021/ja063063b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheldon, R. A. (2007). The E factor: fifteen years on. Green Chem. 9, 1273–1283. doi: 10.1039/b713736m

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheldon, R. A. (2016). Biocatalysis and biomass conversion in alternative reaction media. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 12984–12999. doi: 10.1002/chem.201601940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sherwood, J., Clark, J. H., Fairlamb, I. J. S., and Slattery, J. M. (2019). Solvent effects in palladium catalysed cross-coupling reactions. Green Chem. 21, 2164–2213. doi: 10.1039/C9GC00617F

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sperotto, E., van Klink, G. P. M., van Koten, G., and de Vries, J. G. (2010). The mechanism of the modified Ullmann reaction. Dalton Trans. 39, 10338–10351. doi: 10.1039/c0dt00674b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Strieter, E. R., Blackmond, D. G., and Buchwald, S. L. (2005). The role of chelating diamine ligands in the Goldberg Reaction: a kinetic study on the copper-catalyzed amidation of aryl iodides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4120–4121. doi: 10.1021/ja050120c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Surry, D. S., and Buchwald, S. L. (2008). Biaryl phosphane ligands in palladium-catalyzed amination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6338–6361. doi: 10.1002/anie.200800497

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Surry, D. S., and Buchwald, S. L. (2010). Diamine ligands in copper-catalyzed reactions. Chem. Sci. 1, 13–31. doi: 10.1039/c0sc00107d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tye, J. W., Weng, Z., Johns, A. M., Incarvito, C. D., and Hartwig, J. F. (2008). Copper complexes of anionic nitrogen ligands in the amidation and imidation of aryl halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 9971–9983. doi: 10.1021/ja076668w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullmann, F. (1901). Ueber Synthesen in der Biphenylreihe. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 34, 2174–2185. doi: 10.1002/cber.190103402141

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullmann, F. (1903). Ueber eine neue Bildungsweise von Diphenylaminderivaten. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 36, 2382–2384. doi: 10.1002/cber.190303602174

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ullmann, F. (1904). Ueber eine neue Darstellungsweise von Phenyläthersalicylsäure. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 37, 853–854. doi: 10.1002/cber.190403701141

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vidal, C., García-Álvarez, J., Hernán-Gómez, A., Kennedy, A. R., and Hevia, E. (2014). Introducing deep eutectic solvents to polar organometallic chemistry: chemoselective addition of organolithium and Grignard reagents to ketones in air. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 5969–5973. doi: 10.1002/anie.201400889

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vidal, C., García-Álvarez, J., Hernán-Gómez, A., Kennedy, A. R., and Hevia, E. (2016). Exploiting deep eutectic solvents and organolithium reagent partnerships: chemoselective ultrafast addition to imines and quinolines under aerobic ambient temperature conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 16145–16148. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609929

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Watanabe, K., Yamagiwa, N., and Torisawa, Y. (2007). Cyclopentyl methyl ether as a new and alternative process solvent. Org. Process Res. Dev. 11, 251–258. doi: 10.1021/op0680136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wolfe, J. P., Wagaw, S., Marcoux, J.-F., and Buchwald, S. L. (1998). Rational development of practical catalysts for aromatic carbon–nitrogen bond formation. Acc. Chem. Res. 31, 805–818. doi: 10.1021/ar9600650

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., de Oliveira Vigier, K., Royer, S., and Jérôme, F. (2012a). Deep eutectic solvents: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7108–7146. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35178a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Yao, Q., and Ma, D. (2012b). CuI/DMPAO-catalyzed N-arylation of acyclic secondary amines. Org. Lett. 14, 3056–3059. doi: 10.1021/ol301135c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, W., Fan, M., Yin, J., Jiang, Y., and Ma, D. (2015). CuI/oxalic diamide catalyzed coupling reaction of (hetero)aryl chlorides and amines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11942–11945. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar