One-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of MoS2/Zn0.5Cd0.5S Heterojunction for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Production

A series of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2)/Zn0.5Cd0.5S heterojunctions have been prepared via a mild one-pot hydrothermal method based on the optimization of composition content of primary photocatalyst. The photocatalysts demonstrated significantly improved visible light–driven photocatalytic activity toward H2 evolution from water without using any noble metal cocatalyst. Among the as-prepared composites, 0.2% MoS2/Zn0.5Cd0.5S shows the best performance. The highest H2 evolution rate reaches 21 mmol · g−1 · h−1, which is four times higher than that of pure Zn0.5Cd0.5S. The apparent quantum efficiency is about 46.3% at 425 nm. The superiority is attributed to the tight connection between MoS2 and Zn0.5Cd0.5S by this facile one-step hydrothermal synthesis. As a result, the formation of the heterostructure introduces built-in electric field at the interface that facilitates vectorial charge transfer. More specifically, photogenerated electrons transfer to MoS2 to conduct proton reduction, where the holes are retained on the surface of Zn0.5Cd0.5S to react with the sacrificial reagents. Moreover, the composite presents improved stability without notable activity decay after several cycled tests.


INTRODUCTION
Derived from the high heat of combustion and carbon-neutral energy cycle, hydrogen energy has been envisaged as an appealing substitute for excessively depleted fossil resources (Kim et al., 2014). Since Fujishima and Honda (1972) as the pioneers discovered water photolysis on TiO 2 electrode in 1972, solar H 2 production on semiconductor-based photocatalysts has been widely accepted as an ideal strategy for addressing the imminent energy crisis and incremental pollution issues (Guo et al., 2018;Liu et al., 2018;Jiao et al., 2020). The achievement of this technology lies in rational design and development of efficient and cost-effective photocatalysts with high quantum efficiency (Yan et al., 2009(Yan et al., , 2011Lin et al., 2017;Huckaba et al., 2018;Singh et al., 2018). Particularly, the visible light accounted for 43% of the whole solar spectrum (Guo et al., 2016). Therefore, in the past few decades, much effort has been attempted to synthesize visible light-driven photocatalysts (Tan et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2017Liu et al., , 2018Feng et al., 2018;Hafeez et al., 2018;Jin et al., 2018). Among the various photocatalysts, metal sulfides have been confirmed to be promising assignable to their superior photocatalytic performance (Tsuji et al., 2004;Iwashina et al., 2015;Di et al., 2016;Zhai et al., 2018). Specially, CdS is deemed as one of the most appropriate binary chalcogenide photocatalyst owing to the narrow band gap (∼2.4 eV) for visible light response and the more negative conduction band position than reduction potential of H + /H 2 (0 V vs. NHE, pH = 0) (Chao et al., 2017;Zhou et al., 2017;Yuan et al., 2018). Despite these inherent advantages of CdS photocatalyst, photocorrosion and toxicity should not be ignored. Motivated by well-matched coordination mode between CdS and ZnS, embedding Zn 2+ into crystal cell of CdS to fabricated solid solution (Zn x Cd 1−x S) has been found to increase the stability and photoactivity simultaneously (Liu et al., 2011(Liu et al., , 2013Yang M. et al., 2018).
To further boost the photoactivity of Zn x Cd 1−x S photocatalysts, integrating suitable cocatalysts to trap charges carriers and serve as delicate surface reactive sites would be a productive approach. However, as the most common cocatalyst, the application of noble metals (e.g., Pt and Pd) can be confined only to bench scale because of their high cost and scarcity (Gao et al., 2019;Li et al., 2020a,b). Therefore, the exploration and development of alternative noble metal-free but active cocatalysts are highly desired. Up to now, plenty of earth-abundant transition metal compounds are developed as efficient and non-precious cocatalysts (Zong et al., 2008;Akple et al., 2015;He et al., 2017;Zhang et al., 2017Zhang et al., , 2018Xu et al., 2018). Among them, molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) with layered structures has attracted wide attention because of optimized surface binding free energy of H atoms, large layered structure determined surface area, and excellent structural adjustability (Frame et al., 2010;Li et al., 2013;Qi et al., 2013;Chung et al., 2014;He et al., 2016;Zeng et al., 2017). Furthermore, some other works disclosed the superior cocatalytic function of MoS 2 over TiO 2 , g-C 3 N 4 , and CdS, indicating its general applicability (Zhou et al., 2012;Parayil et al., 2013;Chai et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018). It is highly noted that the assembly of MoS 2 and primary photocatalysts is usually achieved by the time-consuming two-step method, bringing about a weak interfacial interaction for charge transfer and inferior stability (Zong et al., 2008;Frame et al., 2010;Zhou et al., 2012;He et al., 2016). In contrast, one-pot hydrothermal approach has been certified to be feasible to fabricate tight connected interface between photocatalyst and cocatalyst. It can be thus expected that MoS 2 could integrate on the Zn x Cd 1−x S surface with enhanced physicochemical property.
Herein, we reported a simple and low-cost one-step hydrothermal method for coating MoS 2 onto the surface of Zn x Cd 1−x S directly. The series of photocatalysts with different weight ratio between MoS 2 and Zn x Cd 1−x S exhibited superior photocatalytic performance toward H 2 evolution within Na 2 S/Na 2 SO 3 aqueous solution. When the capacity of MoS 2 is 0.2%, the highest activity was approached, with an H 2 production rate of 21 mmol · h −1 · g −1 . Moreover, the durability was further improved by the incorporation of MoS 2 . The improvement dominantly depends on the smooth transfer of electrons through the intimate interface induced by the one-pot hydrothermal route and promoted surface redox reaction at the numerously increased active sites. It is believed that this work could inspire the application of other noble metal-free cocatalyst decorated photocatalyst with highly efficient photocatalytic activity.
One-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of Zn x Cd 1-x S Solid Solution TAA 50 mmol was first dissolved into 35 mL ethanol. Then the ethanol solution was mixed with 35 mL aqueous solution containing certain amount of Cd(CH 3 COO) 2 · 2H 2 O and Zn(CH 3 COO) 2 · 2H 2 O (the total mole number of Cd and Zn precursor is 20 mmol). After stirring for 20 min at 800 revolutions/min (rpm), the suspension was transferred to the 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, followed by heat treatment at 200 • C for 48 h. Based on cooling down naturally, the obtained product was centrifuged and washed with ethanol and deionized water for several times. A yellow powder is prepared by drying the product under vacuum at 80 • C for 5 h. Finally, prepared samples were labeled as Zn x Cd 1−x S, where x equals 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1, respectively, indicating the stoichiometric ratio between Zn and S.
One-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S Nanocomposites Ethanol 35 mL and TAA 50 mmol were dissolved into a 35 mL aqueous solution containing 10 mmol Cd(CH 3 COO) 2 · 2H 2 O and 10 mmol Zn(CH 3 COO) 2 · 2H 2 O. Then 5 mL aqueous solution containing a certain amount Na 2 MoO 4 · 2H 2 O (0; 0.002; 0.004; 0.006 mmol) was added to it with continuous stirring at 800 rpm. After that, the mixture was transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 200 • C for 48 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the resultant product was obtained by centrifugation and washed with deionized water and ethanol for several times thoroughly. Then it was dried at 80 • C in a vacuum oven. According to the difference of concentrations of MoS 2 , the final MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S was designed as Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S, 0.1% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S, 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S, and 0.3% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S, respectively.

Photocatalytic Reactions
The photocatalytic performance of various photocatalysts from the same batch was estimated one after another. Photocatalytic reactions of hydrogen production from water were conducted in a gas-closed system with a side irradiation Pyrex cell (using PLS-SXE300/300UV Xe lamp irradiation) at 35 • C. The photocatalyst powder was dispersed by a magnetic stirrer in an aqueous solution (180 mL) containing Na 2 S (0.35 M) and Na 2 SO 3 (0.25 M) as electron donors. After being evacuated by N 2 gas with a heavy flow for over 20 min, the photocatalysts were irradiated with visible light (λ ≥430 nm) through a cutoff filter from the Xe lamp. The intensity and number of photons of the light source were measured by a fiber-optic spectrometer. The amount of H 2 gas was determined using online gas chromatography (NaX zeolite column, TCD detector, N 2 carrier) or drainage at every hour interval. Blank experiments showed that no H 2 was produced. Apparent quantum yield (AQY) defined by Equation (1) was measured using a 425-nm band-pass filter and an irradiate meter. AQY = the number of reacted electrons/ the number of incident photons = the number of evolved H 2 molecules × 2/the number of incident photons (1)

(Photo)electrochemical Measurements
A CHI760d electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instruments Co., Shanghai, China) was applied to record transient photocurrent response, electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS), and Mott-Schottky (MS) plot. In a typical (photo)electrochemical test, a standard three-electrode system with the sample as working electrode, Ag/AgCl (in saturated KCl) as reference electrode, Pt wire as counter electrode, and sodium sulfate aqueous solution (0.5 M) as the electrolyte was employed. An Xe lamp with a simulated solar light filter (AM 1.5) was adopted as the light source for transient photocurrent response tests. For the preparation of working electrodes, 1 mg of as-synthesized samples and 20 µL of 5% Nafion (DuPont) were uniformly dispersed in 1 mL of water-ethanol mixture solution. After ultrasonication treatment to the mixture for 1 h, 0.5 mL of homogeneous suspension was dropped onto a 2 × 3-cm fluorine-doped tin oxide glass plate. When the samples were naturally dried under ambient temperature, the working electrodes could be obtained.
Characterizations X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of prepared photocatalysts were confirmed by an X'Pert PRO diffractometer using Cu K α (λ = 0.1538 nm) irradiation with constant instrument parameter. Diffuse reflectance ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra were measured on a Hitachi U-4100 spectrometer, equipped with a lab-sphere diffuse reflectance accessory. The crystallite morphologic micrographs were observed by JEOL JSM-7800F field emission scanning electron microscopy and FEI Tecnai G2 F30 transmission electron microscope (TEM). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted on Axis Ultra, Kratos (UK) multifunctional spectrometer using monochromatic Al K α radiation. The C 1s peak at 284.8 eV of adventitious carbon was used for calibration.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The prepared composites were first investigated by XRD. As shown in Figure 1A, comparing with the standard XRD patterns (JCPDS 03-065-0309 for zinc-blende ZnS, JCPDS 01-089-2944 for wurtzite-type CdS), the x -value-dependent phase transition from wurtzite-type structure (x < 0.5) to zinc-blended structure (x ≥ 0.5) was definitely observed. Likewise, on the premise of the same phase structure, all the Zn x Cd 1−x S samples manifested a successive and systematical diffraction peak shift to higher angle with the increase of x-value, implying the successful formation of solid solution (Yang M. et al., 2018). Photocatalytic tests toward H 2 evolution over these Zn x Cd 1−x S photocatalysts behaved a significant volcano trend along with the change of x value ( Figure 1B). When the Zn/Cd ratio reached 1:1, Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S  exhibited the highest activity with an H 2 evolution rate of 4.5 mmol · g −1 · h −1 . In principle, the continuous incorporation of Zn 2+ into CdS lattice is expected to sequentially broaden the band gap of the solution. On the one hand, the widen band gap signifies the narrow light absorption range; on the other hand, it also forebodes the enhanced reduction potential of electrons that resulted from the upshifted conduction band position. Therefore, it is of great benefit for improving photocatalytic activity by coordinating the balance between these two contradictions. As a circumstance, Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S with the suitable band gap and relatively negative conduction band position showed the superior photoactivity in our case. In subsequent investigation, Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S was taken as the primary photocatalyst to integrate with MoS 2 for construction of composites.
The MoS 2 with various loading amounts were then introduced onto the surface of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S via the facile one-pot hydrothermal method. To gain insight into the microstructures, the as-prepared MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S samples were first characterized by XRD. As observed in Figure 2A, all the samples were found with identical diffraction peak positions regardless of the MoS 2 loading amount, indicating the crystal structure of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S was independent of MoS 2 . Further observation revealed the obviously decreased diffraction intensity at 27.6 • with the increase of MoS 2 introduction, which should be ascribed to the scattering and absorption effect of MoS 2 to the incident X-ray. This notion also verified the tight connection between these two  components indirectly, offering a great opportunity to improve the catalytic properties (Zhang et al., 2019). In contrast, no visible diffraction peaks could be discerned to MoS 2 because of its small amount exceeding detection limit. The surface morphology and particle sizes, taking 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S as a model photocatalysts, were tested by high-resolution (HR) TEM. In Figure 2B, the uniformly dispersed composite particles showed a size of ∼120 nm. The HRTEM image of 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S sample in Figure 2C demonstrated the construction of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S solid solution again. Specifically, the smooth fringes of ∼0.32 nm can be indexed to the (111) plane diffraction of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S (Liu et al., 2011). Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to observe the lattice fringes of MoS 2 owing to the low mass ratio of MoS 2 . To this end, the TEM image of 1% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S with a larger MoS 2 content instead was analyzed by HRTEM, as shown in Figure 2D. In this case, the lattice spacing of 0.62 nm corresponding to the (002) planes of MoS 2 can be clearly noticed (Zong et al., 2008), ensuring the successful coating of MoS 2 on the surface of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S. At the same time, it also testified the intimate tangency at atomic scale between MoS 2 and Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S. In principle, this unique heterojunction structure should facilitate photogenerated charges separation and migration at the atomic scale (Zong et al., 2008;Akple et al., 2015;He et al., 2017).
To uncover the optical property of as-prepared composites, some crucial characterizations were then carried out. The UV-vis absorption spectra of MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S samples are presented in Figure 3. The pure Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S nanocrystal exhibited an apparent absorption band edge at ∼492 nm. The band gap of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S thus can be estimated to be 2.52 eV, respectively. Furthermore, pristine MoS 2 exhibited a strong light absorbance in the whole UV and visible region. The notion implies the metallic property of MoS 2 , foreboding a high potential to be cocatalyst. For the MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S composites, they showed no distinct difference in absorption band. Nonetheless, the light absorption at longer wavelength between 520 and 800 nm was obviously increased. This enhancement was gradually amplified with the increased content of MoS 2 . All the phenomena above collectively confirm that the inherent band structure of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S is well-preserved even after coupling MoS 2 , indicating that MoS 2 was merely adhered on the surface of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S tightly rather than Mo 4+ incorporated into the Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S crystal lattice.
Subsequently, the composite photocatalysts were investigated by PL. The spectra with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm are displayed in Figure 4. Pure Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S exhibited a strong intrinsic emission peak, indicating severe recombination of free carriers in Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S. As MoS 2 was integrated with Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S, a similar spectrum trend with significantly quenched PL intensity of composites was observed, confirming the crucial function of MoS 2 in accelerating the charge carriers transfer (Wang et al., 2019(Wang et al., , 2020a. The optimized photogenerated carriers' dynamics also can be concluded from some other photoelectrochemical characterizations, including electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and transient photocurrent response. As exhibited in Figure 4B, the smaller radius on the Nyquist plots of composites than that of pure Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S verifies the dramatically promoted electronic conductivity from Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S to MoS 2 (Wang et al., 2019(Wang et al., , 2020a. Meanwhile, the smallest semicircle of 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S certifies the content superiority. Figure 4C shows the transient photocurrent responses of samples in chopped illumination cycles. The enhanced photocurrent response of composite indicates the significant role of MoS 2 in accelerating charge separation and improving surface reaction kinetics (Wang et al., 2019(Wang et al., , 2020a. Notably, a small content of MoS 2 (i.e., 0.1% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S) could induce insufficient active sites in the catalyst, whereas a large amount of MoS 2 (i.e., 0.3% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S) would introduce new recombination centers. Both situations are unfavorable to depress the recombination rate of carriers and thus with limited ability to boost the redox reaction. As a result, 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S with the lowest PL signal, smallest EIS radius, and highest photocurrent could be expected to have a higher photocatalytic performance (Bi et al., 2016).
We next sought to understand the surface chemical states by using XPS analysis. Taking 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S as an example, the XPS survey scans shown in Figure 5 revealed the existence of all the expected elements. The tiny peak intensity of Mo certified the low content in composite. The HR Zn 2p XPS spectra displayed two peaks at binding energies of 1,021.45 and 1,044.53 eV, which can be assigned to Zn 2p 3/2 and Zn 2p 1/2 , respectively ( Figure 5A; Qin et al., 2017). Meanwhile, the two well-defined peaks centered at 404.84 and 411.64 eV in the HR Cd 3d XPS spectra represented Cd 3d 5/2 and Cd 3d 3/2 , respectively ( Figure 5B). For sulfur, it was demonstrated in the chemical state of S 2− (Figure 5C). The above analysis provided further proofs on the formation of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S solid solution. Furthermore, the peaks of Mo 3d appearing at binding energies of 227.87 and 231.27 eV belong to Mo 3d 5/2 and Mo 3d 3/2 , respectively. It indicates that Mo 4+ is the dominant chemical state ( Figure 5D). More importantly, these peaks solidly indicate the 1T phase for MoS 2 in 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S (2H at 229.0 and 232.3 eV) (Wang et al., 2013). Generally, MoS 2 with 1T phase can function as a cocatalyst because of its metallic character (Bai et al., 2015). These results evidently confirm the successful synthesis of MoS 2 cocatalyst (He et al., 2016;Zhang et al., 2018). Collectively, the XPS analysis further confirmed the coexistence of MoS 2 and Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S solid solution in composites.
The photocatalytic activity toward H 2 production from water over the MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S composite photocatalysts was then evaluated under visible-light irradiation ( Figure 6A). No H 2 evolution was detected without either illumination or photocatalyst, indicating the photocatalytic function of MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S composite photocatalysts. As displayed in Figure 6A, the photocatalytic hydrogen production via water splitting increased linearly with time. Pure Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S showed a low photocatalytic activity due to the rapid recombination of electron-hole pairs. While the introduction of the MoS 2 cocatalyst gave rise to a significant improvement in the photocatalytic H 2 evolution, this phenomenon can be explained by the fact that MoS 2 can effectively extract electron from Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S and act as the active site of photocatalytic H 2 production. More importantly, an MoS 2 content-dependent volcano-type trend for the activity was also acquired. With a low content of MoS 2 , although the charge transfer dynamics can be accelerated in some degree, the insufficient active sites restrict the extraction of electrons from Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S and the surface reaction rates. However, too much MoS 2 introduction will impede optical absorption, shield the photoactive sites, and induce new recombination centers. Therefore, the hydrogen production rate was reduced in the two cases. With the optimal loading amount of cocatalyst, 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S showed the highest hydrogen production rate of 21 mmol · h −1 · g −1 , deriving from the appropriate photoabsorption, charge transfer rate, and active sites. The activity is four times higher than that of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S. Meanwhile, the AQY of 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S was also measured to be as high as 46.3% at 425 nm. The photostability of the composite photocatalysts was also evaluated by taking 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S as an example. As seen from Figure 6B, continuous hydrogen output with constant rate over 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S was clearly appreciable, even if this reaction proceeded for more than 30 h. The above result enunciates the desirable chemical stability of the as-prepared composite photocatalysts. Moreover, the XRD ( Figure 6C) and XPS (Figures 6D-F) examination of the 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S after a three-time recycling test, without unveiling non-detectable alternations relative to fresh sample, provided further evidence for the sufficient protection of MoS 2 to the primary Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S photocatalyst.
In order to acquire the photocatalytic mechanism of the composite, the band alignment should be determined first. The exact band level can be determined by an intercept method in MS plots together with the band gap derived from the UV-vis absorbance spectra. As exhibited in Figure 7A, the flat band potentials (E fb ) of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S and MoS 2 were estimated to be −0.47 and −0.27 V (vs. RHE), respectively. Generally, the CB position is considered to be more negative by 0.2 eV than E fb for semiconductor. Accordingly, the authentic CB for Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S is −0.67 V (vs. RHE). Combining the band gap of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S that was determined to be 2.52 eV, the VB of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S is calculated to be 1.85 V (vs. RHE), respectively, while for the metallic MoS 2 , the flat band potentials approximately equal its Fermi level (E f ) (Ran et al., 2017). Based on the above analysis, the photocatalytic pathway over MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S composite photocatalysts was illustrated in Figure 7B. From a thermodynamic viewpoint, both E g and E CB of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S satisfy the precondition for photocatalytic H 2 generation. Hence, this reaction process under assistant of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S would take place very smoothly. Upon exposing to visible light, the electrons in VB of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S will be excited to its CB to induce electron-hole pairs. Because of the thermodynamic driving force induced by the distance between low Fermi level of MoS 2 and high CB of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S, together with the small interface barriers that stemmed from strong interaction between MoS 2 and Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S caused by onepot hydrothermal treatment, the electrons on Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S will directionally migrate to MoS 2 , leading to a spatial separation of these charge carries (Chang et al., 2015;Yin et al., 2016). As a result, the protons will be effectively reduced to be H 2 at active sites provided by MoS 2 , accompanied by transfer of holes to surface of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S for consumption by the sacrificial agents, leading to the promotion of photocatalytic activity over these MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S composites.

CONCLUSIONS
In summary, a series of MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S composite photocatalysts have been successfully constructed. The success relies upon a mild one-pot hydrothermal process for incorporating MoS 2 on the surface of Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S solid solution in identical growth environment. All the composite photocatalysts showed significant enhancement in solar hydrogen evolution. The highest photoactivity was achieved over the 0.2% MoS 2 /Zn 0.5 Cd 0.5 S photocatalyst, with an H 2 production rate of 21 mmol · h −1 · g −1 and an AQY of 46.3% at 425 nm, highlighting the intense promoting effect of MoS 2 as a cocatalyst. Specifically, MoS 2 can steer the electrons through the interface between these two components by strong interfacial interaction formed in a one-pot hydrothermal method. Meanwhile, abundant active sites provided by MoS 2 also can facilitate the surface redox reaction. This work provides the feasibility to develop noble metal-free cocatalyst incorporating a photocatalyst system for efficient and stable H 2 evolution.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All datasets presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material.