Molecular Engineering of Polymyxin B for Imaging and Treatment of Bacterial Infections

Introduction

Driven by the rapid emergence of bacterial resistance throughout the world, tremendous efforts have been made to discover novel antibacterial agents and therapies for the imaging and treatment of bacterial infections. However, given the slow progress in the current antibiotic development pipeline, revitalizing the “old” antibiotics by molecularly engineering them into more effective and safer therapies has been considered as a promising alternative for immediate clinical applications (Årdal et al., 2020).

Among all the “old” antibiotics, the revival of previously abandoned polymyxin B (PMB) is the most striking example. PMB is a family of cyclic non-ribosomal lipopeptides that naturally produced by the Gram-positive Paenibacillus polymyxa (Storm et al., 1977). These peptides can selectively bind to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacteria and exert their antibacterial activities by disrupting both the outer and inner membranes of Gram-negative bacteria (Nation et al., 2015). However, due to their reported nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, the clinical use of PMB has been discarded (Dai et al., 2019; Oliota et al., 2019). Only in the late 1980s, the PMB was reintroduced as the last-resort for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria that resistant to conventional antibiotics (Velkov et al., 2010). Simultaneously, increasing studies have sought to rationally engineer the PMB molecules to fully unlock their therapeutic potentials.

An understanding on the activities of PMB require knowledge of its structural properties. The PMB molecule composes of a cyclic heptapeptide headgroup and a linear tripeptide lipid tail. The commercially available PMB, which is produced by fermentation, is a mixture of two main components with closely related structures (compound 1, Figure 1A). There are five cationic diaminobutyric acid (Dab) residues in PMB, allowing for its accumulation at the anionic bacterial membrane. The specific electrostatic interactions between the positively charged PMB Dab residues and the negatively charged Gram-negative bacterial lipid A phosphates, competitively replace the membrane stabilizing divalent cations and bring the N-terminal fatty acyl tail of PMB into proximity with the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria (Clausell et al., 2007). Subsequently, both the hydrophobic lipid tail and _D-Phe⁶-_L-Leu⁷ domain of PMB insert into the OM, weakening the packing of adjacent lipid A fatty acyl chain and expanding the monolayer of OM. The permeation of OM enables the PMB to penetrate into the periplasmic space and disrupt the physical integrity of the inner membrane by straddling and exchanging the phospholipid bilayer (Rabanal and Cajal, 2017). The osmotic balance of Gram-negative bacteria is thereby broken, leading to the lytic cell death (Yu et al., 2015).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. (A) Chemical structures of polymyxin B (compound 1) and its engineered molecular imaging agent ^99mTc-HYNIC-PMB (compound 2), optical imaging agent NBD-PMB (compound 3-6), and photosensitizing agents (compound 7 and compound 8). (B) Illustration of the polymyxin B based imaging and photosensitizing agents targeting Gram-negative bacteria.

To improve the microbiological, pharmacological and toxicological profiles of PMB, substantial efforts have been made to discover of PMB analogues based on medical chemistry strategies (Velkov et al., 2010). Structure-activity relationships (SAR) drawn from the antibacterial activities of these analogues indicate that the unique structural properties of PMB is crucial for its targeted LPS binding and effective bactericidal action. For example, substitution of the Dab residues in the cyclic peptide ring of PMB with neutral aminobutyric acid residues resulted in a complete loss of antimicrobial activity (Vaara et al., 2008). While significantly reduced affinity for the isolated rat kidney brush border membranes was observed for these analogues with decreased positive charges, suggesting reduced nephrotoxicity. Proteolytic removal of the N-terminal fatty acyl tail and Dab segment generates the polymyxin nonapeptide PMBN. Even though the PMBN lacks direct bactericidal activity, it retains the highly specific LPS binding ability and displays a markedly reduced toxicity profile (Vaara and Vaara, 1983). Based on these collective knowledges on SAR, PMB has been increasingly utilized as functional building scaffold to incorporate additional functional domains, such as imaging and photosensitizing moieties, for the development of advanced therapies for bacterial infections.

In this context, we will summarize the recent advances in exploiting the PMB as building block to design functional molecules or materials for targeted imaging and efficient treatment of bacterial infections. Rather than being comprehensive, we aim to outline the molecular design strategies, illustrated with selected examples, and highlight how the modification and organization of the PMB molecules alter their specificity, potency and clinical relevance towards their widespread adoption to fight bacterial infections. We hope this mini review will provide scientists with diverse molecular engineering approaches, which may represent the next wave of research against bacterial infections, to propel the “old” polymyxin B to “new” clinical significance.

Imaging of Bacterial Infections

In the clinic, accurate and rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections can aid clinicians in deciding the optimal route and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment. However, conventional identification methods of bacteria, such as culture and colony counting, are labor-intensive and time-consuming (Huang et al., 2021). Although the emerging molecular techniques, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chromatography and mass spectrometry, as well as electrochemical sensing, reduce the detection time and improve the detection sensitivity, expensive equipment, professional technicians and complicated operations are required (Tsalik et al., 2018). Besides, these molecular diagnostic methods require clinical samples (e.g., blood, urine, stool etc.), which may not represent the local biology of the exact infection sites (Ordonez et al., 2019). It is therefore imperative to develop novel approaches for the direct imaging of bacterial infections in vivo.

Currently, the in vivo imaging of bacterial infections remains challenging. Clinically available imaging tools such as radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) function on visualizing the anatomical changes. Consequently, only late-stage bacterial infections, which become systemic and caused significant damage to key tissues and organs, can be diagnosed by these structural imaging approaches (Trampuz and Zimmerli, 2006; Jain, 2017). To make the treatment more effective and less costly, imaging of the early-stage bacterial infections will be essential. Fortunately, both molecular imaging and optical imaging have provided attractive tools to achieve it. However, these two functional imaging techniques are still restricted for their clinical implementation, since they reflect the physiological changes during all the inflammatory process, cannot reliably distinguish bacterial infections from inflammations caused by other diseases (Ordonez et al., 2019).

To realize the full potential of these functional imaging techniques for more specific detection of bacterial infections, substantial efforts have been devoted to develop the bacteria-targeted imaging strategies. Since bacterial (prokaryotic) cells are evolutionarily and phylogenetically distinct from mammalian (eukaryotic) cells in proteins, nucleic acids, cell wall components and even metabolism, targeting molecules including antibodies, DNA/RNA ligands, antibiotics and also metabolizable compounds have been utilized correspondingly to facilitate the targeted bacterial infection imaging (van Oosten et al., 2015; Mills et al., 2016). For example, maltodextrin (e.g. maltose, maltotriose, and maltohexose) is the major source of glucose for bacteria and is taken up by bacteria through the maltodextrin transporter, which is not expressed in mammalian cells (Dahl and Manson, 1985). Accordingly, several maltodextrin-based imaging probes have been exploited as metabolic substrates for imaging of bacterial infections with high specificity over sterile inflammations (Ning et al., 2011; Zlitni et al., 2020).

Additionally, infections caused by specific species of bacteria can also be differentially imaged with the help of the bacterial selectively interacted molecules. Since the efficacy spectrum of most antibiotic is dependent on the species of bacteria, labelled antibiotics have been extensive studied for the bacteria-specific imaging. Best known antibiotic being exploited is vancomycin, a glycopeptide that binds efficiently to the D-ala-D-ala moiety of lipid II in the nascent cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria (Pasquina-Lemonche et al., 2020). Promising results were reported on the use of NIR fluorophore IRDye 800 CW conjugated vancomycin (vanco-800CW) for real-time in vivo imaging of Gram-positive bacterial infections on both murine myositis and human post-mortem implant models (Van Oosten et al., 2013). As for imaging of Gram-negative bacterial infections, the cationic and cyclic antibiotic PMB that selectively binding to lipid A of LPS on the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria have been increasingly exploited (Figure 1B).

By radiolabeling PMB with ^99mTc via a succinimidyl-6-hydrazinonicotinate hydrochloride (HYNIC) linker, ^99mTc-HYNIC-PMB (compound 2, Figure 1A) was obtained most recently as a new single photon emission imaging agent for the non-invasive identification of Gram-negative bacterial infections (Auletta et al., 2021). In the mice with right thigh bacterial infections, the lateral tail vein injected ^99mTc-HYNIC-PMB exhibited significantly higher target-to-background ratio for Gram-negative bacteria than Gram-positive bacteria under gamma camera imaging. However, the HYNIC react with PMB mainly via the γ-amine groups of α, γ-diaminobutyric acid, which are also responsible for the specific binding of LPS in Gram-negative bacteria. Hence, investigations are still needed to deeply understand the mechanism of action and behavior of ^99mTc-HYNIC-PMB.

Besides being exploited as nuclear molecular imaging agents, PMB has also been chemically modified to facilitate the optical imaging of Gram-negative bacterial infection. By removal of the hydrophobic tail and two amino acid residues and replaced with various linkers attached to the fluorophore 7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD), a panel of NBD-PMB (compound 3-6, Figure 1A) were synthesized and evaluated for their Gram selectivity (Akram et al., 2018). Compared to NBD-PMX with progressive lengthening of hydrophobic acyl spacers (compound 4-6), the NBD-PMX with a hydrophilic amino-PEG2-carboxylate spacer (compound 3) displayed the highest preference in labeling Gram-negative over Gram-positive bacterial species and mammalian cells. Its mode of action was further demonstrated to be connected with the specific interaction between the cyclic ring of PMB and lipid A of LPS, since it displayed a lack of binding to the K56-2 bacterial strain that mutated in lipid A expression. After intrapulmonary micro-dosing, the NBD-PMX probe (compound 3) enabled in situ identification of Gram-negative bacteria in distal human airways and alveoli within minutes by optical endomicroscopy, representing potentially significant advantageous over current technologies.

Since the aforementioned two PMB based imaging agents are administrated by either lateral tail vein injection or intrapulmonary micro-dosing, the existing of gut bacteria will not introduce any background noise. While being recognized as a newly discovered organ, gut microbiota has also been extensively studied. Emerging imaging strategies for the commensal microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut have been recently summarized in an inspiring review that is encouraged to read (Lin et al., 2021).

Treatment of Bacterial Infections

Polymyxin B Based Photosensitizing Agents

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a medical treatment that utilizes a light source to active a non-toxic photosensitizer (PS) in the presence of oxygen, generating highly cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) and destroying abnormal cells consequently (Castano et al., 2004). It is initially used for the treatment of skin and cancer diseases (Agostinis et al., 2011), while has gained great attention nowadays as a promising alternative to the emerging ineffectiveness of antibiotic treatment for bacterial infections (Wainwright et al., 2017) (Klausen et al., 2020). Compared to the conventional antibiotic treatment, the PDT not only has more rapid and broader spectrum antimicrobial properties, but also be unlikely to give rise to the bacterial resistance, since the produced ROS can damage nearly all types of biomolecules, leading to bacterial death (Vatansever et al., 2013). Despite these outstanding advantageous, two major drawbacks of PS, which lie in its 1) poor selectivity and off-target damage to mammalian cells; 2) low penetrability and reduced efficiency against Gram-negative bacteria and bacteria in biofilms, still limit the clinical adoption of PDT for antibacterial treatments.

To improve the selectivity and penetrability of PS towards pathogenic bacteria, PMB has been utilized as a functional building block to engineer PS conjugates for the targeted antibacterial PDT (Figure 1B). Using a thiol-maleimide “click” coupling, a cationic porphyrin was covalently attached to a cysteine modified PMB derivative (compound 7, Figure 1A) (Le Guern et al., 2017). Compared to the cationic porphyrin alone, enhanced bactericidal efficiency was achieved with the addition of modified PMB derivative, which could anchor to and weaken the bacterial membranes (Nitzan et al., 1992). However, the modification induced reduction of cationic charges of PMB and rendered its specificity against Gram-negative bacteria, with an emerging activity against Gram-positive S. aureus being observed. To eliminate the potential risk of rising PMB resistance, four diaminobutyric acid residues of compound 7 were substituted with the lysine ones in a following study (Le Guern et al., 2018). The lysine analogue of compound 7 showed reduced dark toxicity (bactericidal activity), while maintained the high photoinactive potency against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

In contrast to the above studies that engineered with the entire PMB molecule, Ucuncu et al. removed the hydrophobic tail of PMB and conjugated it with an FDA approved PS methylene blue (MB) through a short polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker (compound 8, Figure 1A) (Ucuncu et al., 2020). Without the hydrophobic tail, compound 8 exhibited decreased dark toxicity, while preserving the high Gram-negative bacteria specificity. In addition, the comparatively hydrophilicity and small size of compound 8 presumably allow its deeper penetration into the thick extracellular polymer matrix of biofilms and well-organized outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Upon light irradiation, outstanding killing potency was achieved against Gram-negative E. coli not only in the planktonic status, but also in the infected porcine skin and most importantly biofilms. Moreover, no side effect of compound 8 was observed on human erythrocytes, demonstrating its high therapeutic potential to treat Gram-negative bacterial infections.

Polymyxin B Based Delivery Systems

Currently, the major factor limiting the wide applications of PMB in clinical practice is its potential nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, which are considered to be dose-dependent (Dai et al., 2019; Oliota et al., 2019). Therefore, a targeted or localized delivery system is critically needed to reduce the dose of administration and consequently toxicity of PMB. Fortunately, the thriving field of nanomedicine over the past few decades has provided advantageous possibilities to deliver drugs to their site of action and maximize their therapeutic outcomes. Diverse delivery systems based on nanoparticles, liposomes, hydrogels, micromembranes and microneedles have been developed for the targeted and controlled release of PMB (Dubashynskaya and Skorik, 2020). While in most of the nanomaterial systems, such as liposomal formulations, PMB is just physically entrapped inside the preformed delivery vehicles. Considering its chemical structure, which contains five cationic amine residues and a lipophilic acyl tail, PMB has also been increasingly exploited as building block for the construction of its own delivery systems. For instance, the anionic poly(styrene sulphonate) (PSS) was utilized to co-assemble with cationic PMB for the formation of polyion complex (PIC) nanoparticle (Figure 2A) (Insua et al., 2017). By adjusting the ratio of PSS and PMB, stable colloidal PIC nanoparticles with an average particle diameter of 140 ± 30 nm were prepared and demonstrated to preserve inhibition activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa for at least 8 h. The inhibition time of bacterial growth was further proven to be formulation-dependent, based on a competing balance between the content of PMB and stability of the co-assembled PIC nanoparticles.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. The polymyxin B-based delivery systems: (A) Polyion complex nanoparticles co-assembled from polymyxin B with poly(styrene sulphonate). Reproduced from (Insua et al., 2017), published by Elsevier Ltd., (B) polymyxin B crosslinked hydrogels based on the core-shell micelles assembled from the phenylboronic acid functionalized polycarbonate and polyethylene glycol triblock copolymer (PBC-PEG-PBC). Adapted with permission from (Obuobi et al., 2018). Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH GmbH, (C) polymyxin B crosslinked hydrogels based on the lamellar nanofibers assembled from rationally designed peptide amphiphiles. Adapted from (Shi et al., 2021), published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

In addition to nanoparticles, PMB has also been utilized as crosslinker for the formation of hydrogels. For example, phenylboronic acid (PBA) functionalized polycarbonate (PBC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) triblock copolymer (PBC-PEG-PBC) was synthesized and reported to self-assembled into core-shell micelles in aqueous solution (Obuobi et al., 2018). Upon addition of PMB, hydrogel formation was achieved via the hydrogen bond, hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic forces between the functional PBA blocks of copolymer and the amine groups of PMB (Figure 2B). By repositioning the substituents on the aryl ring of PBA, hydrogels with varying swelling behaviors, mechanical strengths, as well as PMB loading and release capacities could be obtained. The optimum meta-PBA hydrogel exhibited sustained PMB release over 48 h, which further enabled the prolonged antibacterial activity of PMB against Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infections in mouse model. In another example most recently reported by us, peptide amphiphile composed of a glutamic acid–threonine–glutamic acid head and N-terminal acryl tail was rationally designed and self-assembled into lamellar nanofibers in aqueous solution (Shi et al., 2021). With PMB bearing the opposite charges as ionic cross-linker, the lamellar nanofibers were triggered to form robust hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties (Figure 2C). Sustained PMB release via diffusion-dependent kinetics over a 5-day period was observed from the hydrogels, which were demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in the Galleria mellonella burn wound infection model. Moreover, with the successful incorporation of additional fusidic acid, the porous hydrogels displayed complementary antibacterial effect against Gram-positive bacteria and also enhanced antibacterial effect against Gram-negative bacteria, envisioning their potential for combined antimicrobial therapy. However, in vivo evaluations of the toxicological profiles of PMB (Chai et al., 2020), in terms of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, are lacking in all the presented delivery systems and are needed to be investigated in the future.

Conclusion and Outlook

As outlined in this mini review, revitalizing the “old” PMB for “new” clinical significance in the imaging and treatment of bacterial infections is still in its infancy, but emerging progresses have been made based on the molecular engineering approach. Being exploited as a functional scaffold, the PMB molecule has been rationally engineered into diverse molecules and materials to achieve the targeted imaging and efficient treatment of bacterial infections.

Considering its specific interaction with the lipid A of LPS on the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, PMB has been engineered not only as imaging agents to facilitate the targeted molecular imaging and optical imaging of Gram-negative bacterial infections, but also as photosensitizing agents to enable the targeted PDT for the effective treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. Since PMB anchors to bacterial membranes mainly via the electrostatic interactions rather than any specific receptors, it relatively rare to induce bacterial resistance compared to other antibiotics. However, with its increasing clinical use, polymyxin resistance is also appearing at an alarming rate. Bacterial surfaces of the resistant strains were observed with reduced negative charges due to the controlled addition of positively charged residues, such as 4-amino-l-arabinose, phosphoethanolamine and/or galactosamine to LPS (Moffatt et al., 2019). As a consequence, the specific interaction between polymyxin and LPS is reduced. Therefore, despite the promising progress made on the engineering of PMB based imaging agents and photosensitizing agents, strategies and approached aimed at decreasing the antibacterial activity of the peptide moiety while preserving its target specificity are still needed in the future. Furthermore, PMB based agents with both imaging and photosensitizing capacities should be rationally engineered so that the targeted theranostic of bacterial infections would be achieved.

As for the molecularly engineered delivery systems, the release of PMB in a more controlled manner should be considered. Current systems are mainly co-assembled based on the non-covalent interactions between PMB and other functional building blocks, thus the release of PMB is diffusion-depended with burst release being typically observed. To reduce the dose related toxicity and prolong the antibacterial efficiency of PMB, the specific conditions of bacterial infected environment, such as pH gradient, overexpression of certain enzymes and ROS storage, should be utilized to rationally design self-assembling PMB conjugates, which could form supramolecular delivery systems with tunable linear release rate (Chakroun et al., 2019). Additionally, complementary agents with different antibacterial mechanism could be co-delivered to achieve synergistic antibacterial effect for the combined antimicrobial therapy. Meanwhile, besides the hydrogel formulation engineered for topical administration of PMB, other nanomaterial delivery systems should also be developed to facilitate the oral, inhalable and transdermal administrations. Despite the above challenges, it is conceivable that combined effort by researchers from diverse field would bring forward a spectrum of molecular engineering approaches to maximize the therapeutic potentials of polymyxin B for combating bacterial infections.

Author Contributions

MW, SH and HT wrote this work with inputs from HH and YS for conceiving, reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors have approved the manuscript for publication.

Funding

This work was sponsored by Shanghai Pujiang Program (21PJ1404100), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC2100201), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91849129 and 22077078).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Agostinis, P., Berg, K., Cengel, K. A., Foster, T. H., Girotti, A. W., Gollnick, S. O., et al. (2011). Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer: An Update. Ca: A. Cancer J. CliniciansCancer J. Clin. 61, 250–281. doi:10.3322/caac.20114

Akram, A. R., Chankeshwara, S. V., Scholefield, E., Aslam, T., McDonald, N., Megia-Fernandez, A., et al. (2018). In Situ identification of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Human Lungs Using a Topical Fluorescent Peptide Targeting Lipid A. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaal0033. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aal0033

Årdal, C., Balasegaram, M., Laxminarayan, R., McAdams, D., Outterson, K., Rex, J. H., et al. (2020). Antibiotic Development - Economic, Regulatory and Societal Challenges. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 267–274. doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0293-3

Auletta, S., Galli, F., Varani, M., Campagna, G., Conserva, M., Martinelli, D., et al. (2021). In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of 99mtc-Polymyxin B for Specific Targeting of Gram-Bacteria. Biomolecules 11, 232. doi:10.3390/biom11020232

Castano, A. P., Demidova, T. N., and Hamblin, M. R. (2004). Mechanisms in Photodynamic Therapy: Part One-Photosensitizers, Photochemistry and Cellular Localization. Photodiagnosis Photodynamic Ther. 1, 279–293. doi:10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00007-4

Chai, M., Gao, Y., Liu, J., Deng, Y., Hu, D., Jin, Q., et al. (2020). Polymyxin B‐Polysaccharide Polyion Nanocomplex with Improved Biocompatibility and Unaffected Antibacterial Activity for Acute Lung Infection Management. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901542–1901548. doi:10.1002/adhm.201901542

Chakroun, R. W., Wang, F., Lin, R., Wang, Y., Su, H., Pompa, D., et al. (2019). Fine-tuning the Linear Release Rate of Paclitaxel-Bearing Supramolecular Filament Hydrogels through Molecular Engineering. ACS Nano 13, 7780–7790. doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b01689

Clausell, A., Garcia-Subirats, M., Pujol, M., Busquets, M. A., Rabanal, F., and Cajal, Y. (2007). Gram-negative Outer and Inner Membrane Models: Insertion of Cyclic Cationic Lipopeptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 551–563. doi:10.1021/jp06475710.1021/jp064757+

Dahl, M. K., and Manson, M. D. (1985). Interspecific Reconstitution of Maltose Transport and Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli with Maltose-Binding Protein from Various Enteric Bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 164, 1057–1063. doi:10.1128/jb.164.3.1057-1063.1985

Dai, C., Xiao, X., Li, J., Ciccotosto, G. D., Cappai, R., Tang, S., et al. (2019). Molecular Mechanisms of Neurotoxicity Induced by Polymyxins and Chemoprevention. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10, 120–131. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00300

Dubashynskaya, N. V., and Skorik, Y. A. (2020). Polymyxin Delivery Systems: Recent Advances and Challenges. Pharmaceuticals 13, 83. doi:10.3390/ph13050083

Huang, Y., Chen, W., Chung, J., Yin, J., and Yoon, J. (2021). Recent Progress in Fluorescent Probes for Bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 7725–7744. doi:10.1039/d0cs01340d

Insua, I., Majok, S., Peacock, A. F. A., Krachler, A. M., and Fernandez-Trillo, F. (2017). Preparation and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Polyion Complex (PIC) Nanoparticles Loaded with Polymyxin B. Eur. Polym. J. 87, 478–486. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.08.023

Jain, S. K. (2017). The Promise of Molecular Imaging in the Study and Treatment of Infectious Diseases. Mol. Imaging Biol. 19, 341–347. doi:10.1007/s11307-017-1055-0

Klausen, M., Ucuncu, M., and Bradley, M. (2020). Design of Photosensitizing Agents for Targeted Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy. Molecules 25, 5239. doi:10.3390/molecules25225239

Le Guern, F., Ouk, T.-S., Ouk, C., Vanderesse, R., Champavier, Y., Pinault, E., et al. (2018). Lysine Analogue of Polymyxin B as a Significant Opportunity for Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 9, 11–16. doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00360

Le Guern, F., Sol, V., Ouk, C., Arnoux, P., Frochot, C., and Ouk, T.-S. (2017). Enhanced Photobactericidal and Targeting Properties of a Cationic Porphyrin Following the Attachment of Polymyxin B. Bioconjug. Chem. 28, 2493–2506. doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00516

Lin, L., Du, Y., Song, J., Wang, W., and Yang, C. (2021). Imaging Commensal Microbiota and Pathogenic Bacteria in the Gut. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2076–2087. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00068

Mills, B., Bradley, M., and Dhaliwal, K. (2016). Optical Imaging of Bacterial Infections. Clin. Transl. Imaging 4, 163–174. doi:10.1007/s40336-016-0180-0

Moffatt, J. H., Harper, M., and Boyce, J. D. (2019). Mechanisms of Polymyxin Resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1145, 55–71. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16373-0_5

Nation, R. L., Li, J., Cars, O., Couet, W., Dudley, M. N., Kaye, K. S., et al. (2015). Framework for Optimisation of the Clinical Use of Colistin and Polymyxin B: The Prato Polymyxin Consensus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 225–234. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70850-3

Ning, X., Lee, S., Wang, Z., Kim, D., Stubblefield, B., Gilbert, E., et al. (2011). Maltodextrin-based Imaging Probes Detect Bacteria In Vivo with High Sensitivity and Specificity. Nat. Mater 10, 602–607. doi:10.1038/nmat3074

Nitzan, Y., Gutterman, M., Malik, Z., and Ehrenberg, B. (1992). Inactivation of Gram-Negative Bacteria by Photosensitized Porphyrins. Photochem. Photobiol. 55, 89–96. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb04213.x

Obuobi, S., Voo, Z. X., Low, M. W., Czarny, B., Selvarajan, V., Ibrahim, N. L., et al. (2018). Phenylboronic Acid Functionalized Polycarbonate Hydrogels for Controlled Release of Polymyxin B in pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infected Burn Wounds. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7, 1701388–8. doi:10.1002/adhm.201701388

Oliota, A. F., Penteado, S. T., Tonin, F. S., Fernandez-Llimos, F., and Sanches, A. C. (2019). Nephrotoxicity Prevalence in Patients Treated with Polymyxins: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 94, 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.11.008

Ordonez, A. A., Sellmyer, M. A., Gowrishankar, G., Ruiz-Bedoya, C. A., Tucker, E. W., Palestro, C. J., et al. (2019). Molecular Imaging of Bacterial Infections: Overcoming the Barriers to Clinical Translation. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaax8251. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aax8251

Pasquina-Lemonche, L., Burns, J., Turner, R. D., Kumar, S., Tank, R., Mullin, N., et al. (2020). The Architecture of the Gram-Positive Bacterial Cell wall. Nature 582, 294–297. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2236-6

Rabanal, F., and Cajal, Y. (2017). Recent Advances and Perspectives in the Design and Development of Polymyxins. Nat. Prod. Rep. 34, 886–908. doi:10.1039/c7np00023e

Shi, Y., Wareham, D. W., Yuan, Y., Deng, X., Mata, A., and Azevedo, H. S. (2021). Polymyxin B‐Triggered Assembly of Peptide Hydrogels for Localized and Sustained Release of Combined Antimicrobial Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2101465. doi:10.1002/adhm.202101465

Storm, D. R., Rosenthal, K. S., and Swanson, P. E. (1977). Polymyxin and Related Peptide Antibiotics. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46, 723–763. doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003451

Trampuz, A., and Zimmerli, W. (2006). Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections Associated with Fracture-Fixation Devices. Injury 37, S59–S66. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.010

Tsalik, E. L., Bonomo, R. A., and Fowler, V. G. (2018). New Molecular Diagnostic Approaches to Bacterial Infections and Antibacterial Resistance. Annu. Rev. Med. 69, 379–394. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-052716-030320

Ucuncu, M., Mills, B., Duncan, S., Staderini, M., Dhaliwal, K., and Bradley, M. (2020). Polymyxin-based Photosensitizer for the Potent and Selective Killing of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Chem. Commun. 56, 3757–3760. doi:10.1039/d0cc00155d

Vaara, M., Fox, J., Loidl, G., Siikanen, O., Apajalahti, J., Hansen, F., et al. (2008). Novel Polymyxin Derivatives Carrying Only Three Positive Charges Are Effective Antibacterial Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 3229–3236. doi:10.1128/AAC.00405-08

Vaara, M., and Vaara, T. (1983). Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Antibiotics and Complement by a Nontoxic Oligopeptide. Nature 303, 526–528. doi:10.1038/303526a0

van Oosten, M., Hahn, M., Crane, L. M. A., Pleijhuis, R. G., Francis, K. P., van Dijl, J. M., et al. (2015). Targeted Imaging of Bacterial Infections: Advances, Hurdles and Hopes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 892–916. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv029

Van Oosten, M., Schäfer, T., Gazendam, J. A. C., Ohlsen, K., Tsompanidou, E., De Goffau, M. C., et al. (2013). Real-time In Vivo Imaging of Invasive- and Biomaterial-Associated Bacterial Infections Using Fluorescently Labelled Vancomycin. Nat. Commun. 4, 2584. doi:10.1038/ncomms3584

Vatansever, F., de Melo, W. C. M. A., Avci, P., Vecchio, D., Sadasivam, M., Gupta, A., et al. (2013). Antimicrobial Strategies Centered Around Reactive Oxygen Species - Bactericidal Antibiotics, Photodynamic Therapy, and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 955–989. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12026

Velkov, T., Thompson, P. E., Nation, R. L., and Li, J. (2010). Structure−Activity Relationships of Polymyxin Antibiotics. J. Med. Chem. 53, 1898–1916. doi:10.1021/jm900999h

Wainwright, M., Maisch, T., Nonell, S., Plaetzer, K., Almeida, A., Tegos, G. P., et al. (2017). Photoantimicrobials-are We Afraid of the Light? Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, e49–e55. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30268-7

Yu, Z., Qin, W., Lin, J., Fang, S., and Qiu, J. (20152015). Antibacterial Mechanisms of Polymyxin and Bacterial Resistance. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2015/679109

Zlitni, A., Gowrishankar, G., Steinberg, I., Haywood, T., and Sam Gambhir, S. (2020). Maltotriose-based Probes for Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging of Bacterial Infections. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–13. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14985-8