Lab-on-a-molecule and multi-analyte sensing

1 Introduction

The first purposely designed lab-on-a-molecule was a chemical entity built with my own hands (Magri et al., 2006a). At the time, I was a post-doctoral research fellow at Queen’s University Belfast in Northern Ireland working in the laboratory and office of Prof. A. Prasanna de Silva. The goal of the project was to synthesize and demonstrate an AND logic gate driven by three chemical inputs, with an optical output, as a direct way of detecting a congregation of chemical species in water.

Having accomplished all of this, the next logical task was to prepare a manuscript. During the preparation of the manuscript for submission to the Journal of the American Chemical Society, a considerable amount of thought and importance was placed on the first lines of the manuscript. How were we going to convince the editor and reviewers of the importance of detecting for three things, rather than just two? Well, after much thought, we reasoned that a third dimension in geometry is a big deal and changes our reality from the concept of area to volume (Abbott, 1950). Then, there is the revolutionary transistor, which, with a third electrode, can regulate current or voltage flow in addition to performing signal amplification; the latter is something a two-electrode one-way diode cannot do (Millman and Grabel, 1988).

At the time, there was much fanfare regarding the state-of-the-art blood analyte Opti Medical cassette and portable device, which provides a readout for six blood serum analytes (Tusa and He, 2005; Yao and de Silva, 2023). The vision put forward in 2006 stems within the context of molecular logic-based computing (de Silva and Uchiyama, 2007; Andréasson and Pischel, 2010; Szaciłowski, 2012; de Silva, 2013; Ling et al., 2015; Andréasson and Pischel, 2018; Erbas-Cakmak et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2020; Magri, 2021). Rather than testing for many disease parameters by many separate tests, followed by manual consideration of the data by a practitioner, what if a medical condition could be directly diagnosed by a single rapid test. Such a molecular device would be a lab-on-a-molecule since a clinically relevant result would emerge from on-board information processing of several sensory channels simultaneously (Magri et al., 2006b). In other words, a lab-on-a-molecule could test for any number of disease markers and provide a diagnostic “Yes” or “No” decision on the condition of the patient.

In 2015, an influential review article on the “Design strategies for lab-on-a-molecule probes and orthogonal sensing” was published in Chem. Soc. Rev. (Chen et al., 2015). It has blurred the original vision of what constitutes a lab-on-a-molecule. In addition to this article, at least two other prior research articles have redefined a lab-on-a-molecule as a chemical entity that can quantitatively sense two or more analytes in a multi-analyte mixture. A Web of Science survey of the primary literature revealed there are 21 publications with lab-on-a-molecule in their titles. When the survey is extended to a topic search (excluding reviews) the number of publications is 27. However, of these lists of publications, perhaps in only one-quarter of the studies, it has been demonstrated that a molecule detects for three chemical species. In this review, only molecules that detect for a minimum of three chemical species are presented.

2 Lab-on-a-molecule and multi-sensing chemosensors

Within lab-on-a-molecule 1, three receptors are present, each specific for an individual analyte. A benzo-15-crown-5 ether binds Na⁺, a tertiary amine binds H⁺, and a phenyliminodiacetate binds Zn²⁺. These components were selected, to some extent, for synthetic convenience. The fluorescent reporter is the planar blue-emitting anthracene fluorophore. These four components are covalently attached and separated by methylene spacers to minimize the distance for photoinduced electron transfer (PET) between the receptors and the excited fluorophore (de Silva et al., 2009). The sensing approach represented by 1 entailed an engineered molecule with a receptor site for each specific analyte examined within the context of molecular logic (Szaciłowski, 2012; de Silva, 2013). In water with high concentration levels of Na⁺, H⁺, and Zn²⁺, the molecule emits blue light with a fluorescent quantum yield (Φ_f) of 0.02 and a threefold enhancement. The absence of just one of the three analytes prevents the molecule from emitting the blue emission due to PET.

Another paradigm for multi-analyte sensing emerged based on the application of distinguishing heavy metal ions by three techniques (Jiménez et al., 2004). As triple-channel sensing molecules 2 and 3 examine metal ions by cyclic voltammetry and UV-vis spectrometry, in addition to fluorescence. These systems are examples with twisted intramolecular charge transfer (TICT) excited states due to twisting about the anilinic C-N or aromatic vinyl bonds (Rettig, 2005). The output of the chemosensors can, in principle, result from any, some, or all these three methods. A blue shift occurred in the absorbance spectrum of 2 with Pb²⁺, while for 3, a hypsochromic shift was accompanied by a color change from red to yellow in the presence of Hg²⁺. The emission was quenched by Cu²⁺ and Fe³⁺ by PET or energy transfer. Anodic shifts in the cyclic voltammograms for Hg²⁺, Pb²⁺, and Fe³⁺ result from cationic destabilization of the radical cation. This study nicely illustrated how a single molecule could selectively detect three different ions via three separate outputs. In a review of this work (Callan et al., 2005), it was concluded that “[they were] not considered along with logic systems, since the targets [were] not presented as sets to the molecular device.”

Chemosensor 4 consists of a ruthenium-phenanthroline lumophore and two aza-crown ethers (Schmittel and Lin, 2007). As a quadruple-channel sensing molecule, it exploits the unprecedented application of an array of analytical techniques to detect Cu²⁺ by UV–vis absorbance, Pb²⁺ by luminescence, Pb²⁺ by cyclic voltammetry, and Hg²⁺ by electrogenerated chemiluminescence. The two crown ethers work cooperatively as a single pocket site (Magri et al., 2006a) to bind non-specifically to larger metal ions as demonstrated with Pb²⁺, Hg²⁺, and Cu²⁺ in acetonitrile. A quiet criticism remarked by a colleague at the Molecular Sensors and Molecular Logic Gate conference, shortly after its publication was whether 4 is more akin to a “molecule-in-a-lab” rather than a “lab-in-a-molecule.” A practical challenge of this strategy from the viewpoint of point-of-care application is the miniaturization of the instrumentation into a single compact device. Another example fitting this genre is an iridium (III) complex as a triple-channel chemosensor for cysteine, homocysteine, and tryptophan (Chen and Schmittel, 2013).

BODIPY-based 5 (Bozdemir et al., 2010) detects for a congregation of three metal ions in a manner similar to 1, where each receptor is selective for a specific analyte. The benzo-aza-crown, benzo-dithio-aza-crown, and dipicolylamine receptors bind Ca²⁺, Hg²⁺, and Zn²⁺, respectively. The three-input logic gate emits at 656 nm with a bright yellow glow, a fluorescence quantum yield of 0.266 and a threefold enhancement in acetonitrile. The quenching mechanism via the benzo-aza-crown is attributed to PET, while the other two receptors quench the emission by an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) mechanism.

Combinatorial differential fluorescence sensing was proposed for the detection and discrimination of medicines (Rout et al., 2014). The tailor-made molecule 6 has multiple boronic acid receptors and four fluorophores (naphthalene, anthracene, fluorene, and dansyl) and a central amino-L-proline (Rout et al., 2012). Binding of various medications results in unique fluorescent signatures due to competing PET, ICT, and Föster resonance energy transfer (FRET) processes. Principle component analysis (PCA) was then applied to the various classes of medication (Wright and Anslyn, 2006). The concept has been extended to other permutations of receptors and fluorophores for chemical inputs that include solvents, metal ions, anions, saccharides, pH, and polarity. Encryption of secret messages (Sarkar et al., 2016) and molecular scale keypad locks (Rout et al., 2013) have further been demonstrated using this approach.

Lab-on-a-molecule 7 (Magri et al., 2014) is an amalgamation of fluorescent Na⁺, H⁺-driven (de Silva et al., 1997a), and Fe³⁺, H⁺-driven AND logic gates (Farrugia and Magri, 2013). It uniquely incorporates three types of chemical equilibria: complexation, acid–base dissociation, and redox equilibria. The benzo-15-crown-5 ether binds Na⁺ and the tertiary amine binds H⁺, while the ferrocene is oxidized by Fe³⁺ to yield ferrocenium and Fe²⁺. PET from the crown receptor, or the alkyl amine, or ferrocene to the anthracene fluorophore competes with fluorescence to quench the emission. The three-input AND logic gate emits an enhanced fluorescence in the presence of high Na⁺, H⁺, and Fe³⁺ levels with a Φ_f of 0.072 in methanol. High levels of Na⁺, H⁺, and Fe³⁺ are associated with various cancer cells, which tend to grow quicker than healthy cells, and therefore accumulate higher levels of various analytes. The same trio of analytes are also early warning markers for corrosion of steel and other ferrous metals (Scerri et al., 2021), particularly for automobiles in colder geographic regions where NaCl is used for deicing snowy roadways.

The ferrocene–naphthalimide–boronic acid conjugate 8 is a type of three-input combinatorial INHIBIT logic gate (Li et al., 2015). A fluorescence output is observed with high Fe³⁺, low sodium L-ascorbate, and low F⁻. Oxidization of the ferrocene moiety with one equivalent of Fe³⁺ acts as an oxidant to oxidize ferrocene to its radical cation, resulting in a 100-fold fluorescent enhancement at 512 nm in THF. The role of L-absorbate is to reduce Fe³⁺ to Fe²⁺ rather than interact with 8 directly. The relationship between these two analytes shows reversible off–on–off switching. F⁻ selectively forms a covalent bond with the boronic ester to form a tetrahedral boronate anion, but it too interferes with Fe³⁺. Hence, Fe³⁺ is the only enabling input, while L-ascorbate and F⁻ both disable the output emission by interacting with Fe³⁺. This logic gate is unconventional compared to 1 as it incorporates the operations of redox chemistry and a chemodosimeter (Du et al., 2012).

Prototype 9 has some resemblance to 7, except that the fluorophore is replaced with an 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide and the arrangement of the module units is different. The input chemicals remain Na⁺, H⁺, and Fe³⁺. A three-input AND logic gate is the predicted functionality based on the PET design concept (Magri, 2021). In practice, the logic gate glowed green under two scenarios in 1:1 MeOH/water: when all three analyte levels were high and when only the H⁺ and Fe³⁺ were present. These two scenarios in isolation are three-input AND (Magri et al., 2006b) and three-input INHIBIT (de Silva et al., 1999) logic operations. With 9, we have an example of wireless integration of both functions within a three-input AND-INHIBIT-OR circuit. A possible explanation for the visualization of light in the INHIBIT case with only H⁺ and Fe³⁺ could be that Fe³⁺ or, more probably, the Fe²⁺ generated by oxidation of the ferrocene interacts with the benzo-crown ether. This example opens up a different application from a clinical diagnostic viewpoint. Three-input AND logic coincides with a state when all three analytes exceed their respective threshold levels. However, for conditions when one of the three analytes are detrimental to the patient—three-input INHIBIT logic—a scenario results where the desired outcome is a situation when two analytes exceed, and the third is below the threshold levels. A combinatorial two-input INHIBIT-AND logic gate was proposed as a method for intelligent medical screening for a protein or for both DNA and a protein in a biological sample autonomously (Konry and Walt, 2009).

Building on the lessons learnt from 9, molecule 10 is a bright green-emitting lab-on-a-molecule (Scerri et al., 2019). The previously used benzo-15-crown-5 ether sodium receptor was upgraded to the stronger binding N-(2-methoxyphenyl)aza-15-crown-5 ether used in binding Na⁺ in blood serum (Tusa and He, 2005). The aliphatic nitrogen atom within the piperazine moiety binds H⁺. The redox-active ferrocene group for sensing Fe³⁺ remains in the same location. Extra effort was required to synthesize this superior aza-crown ether, but it was worth it. In 1:1 (v/v) MeOH/H₂O, the emission digitally switches “on” with a 25-fold enhancement and a Φ_f of 0.203. The reader is reminded of the significance of this trio of analytes in corrosion detection (Scerri et al., 2021). The related two-input AND logic gates simultaneously detect high levels of Fe³⁺ and H⁺ levels under conditions of excess Na⁺ to accelerate the rate of corrosion of mild steel (Scerri et al., 2021).

A type of neuron in the forebrain has high levels of glutamate and zinc that are co-released into the synaptic cleft between neurons. Logic gate 11, based on a hydroxycoumarin-3-aldehyde scaffold, was developed as a prototype for monitoring the co-release of glutamate and zinc from secretory vesicles (Hettie et al., 2014). It was tested in HEPES buffer at an ionic strength of 120 mM NaCl with 1% DMSO with glutamate, Zn²⁺, and OH⁻ (at neutral pH). Rather than relying on intermolecular interactions, the sensing strategy is dependent on the reactivity of the aldehyde functionality where reversible binding of glutamate occurs to form an imine bond. Consequently, a multi-dentate binding pocket forms, whereby Zn²⁺ can bind with the lactone carbonyl oxygen of the coumarin (Bourson et al., 1993) and the N and O atoms of the glutamate. The proton site is the phenolate. An 11-fold fluorescence enhancement is observed under exocytosis conditions with glutamate, Zn²⁺, and neutral pH. This example of a three-input AND logic gate differs from those previously highlighted, in that the receptors are not orthogonal to one another. The molecule functions first as a chemodosimeter to bind the amino acid, which then provides the pocket for Zn²⁺ binding.

Proteins have rarely features as inputs in multi-analyte logic gates (Wu et al., 2011; McLaughlin et al., 2018). Here, we highlight a logic gate 12 driven by two atomic inputs, H⁺ and Na⁺, and a hydrolase enzyme, as the third input (Wright et al., 2020). Candida antarctica lipase B was selected as the biomolecular input after the fluorescence screening of 38 enzymes. The fluorescence response to the three inputs was measured in 1:1 water/DMSO after 30 min at pH 7 with 1.0 M Na⁺. The hydrolysis of the ester by the lipase to the carboxylate anion causes an upward shift in the amine pK_a value due to the stabilization gained from the electrostatic attraction between the protonated amine and the negatively charged carboxylate. This is a clever way of exploiting an electric field effect (Spiteri et al., 2018). The switching enhancement from ester hydrolysis is a non-optimal factor of 2, but as a proof-of-principle, it meets the minimum output threshold.

The 3-pyrazolinyl-naphthalimide hybrid 13 operates as a wavelength-reconfigurable dual-output logic gate (Magri and Camilleri, 2023). The benzo-15-crown-5 receptor contributes as the receptor and PET donor. Irradiated with a 365-nm UV lamp, red emission is initially observed (Φ_f = 0.095). The capture of Na⁺ reveals orange emission (Φ_f = 0.27). When substituted with Mg²⁺, remarkably, the result is a Φ_f = 0.40 and white light emission (WLE). The presence of high H⁺ deactivates the excited state by protonation of the pyrazoline atom via charge transfer. The molecular device can function as two INHIBIT gates in parallel with H⁺ as the disabling input. Alternatively, on excitation at 470 nm, 13 is reconfigurable as a three-input OR-INHIBIT combinatorial logic gate. Other related prototypes are envisioned by replacement of the phenyl ring at the naphthalimide with ferrocene, for example, or the introduction of an enzyme input as is with 9 (Wright et al., 2020), or by attachment of the molecular logic gate to a solid support for sensing in water (Vella Refalo et al., 2018, 2019). Other notable rare examples of WLE logic gates are a coumarin–rhodamine coordinated complex with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles for selective detection of ClO⁻ and SCN⁻ ions (Zhi et al., 2015) and Eu³⁺- and Tb³⁺-doped tribochromism coordination polymers (Yang et al., 2017).

A triple-channel fluorescent probe 14 for the detection and discrimination of cyanide, hydrazine, and hypochlorite was demonstrated in water (Suna et al., 2023). The molecule is engineered on a D-π-A platform with triphenylamine as the electron-donating group, a fluorobenzene-substituted thienothiophene as the π spacer, and a thiobarbituric acid as the electron-accepting group. Excitation with 360 nm light reveals white emission with CN⁻, green emission with hydrazine, and orange emission with ClO⁻. The trio of analytes react with 14 by nucleophilic addition at the vinylthiophene position. The practical uses of the probe were verified with spring water and wastewater and, for hypochlorite, with fruits and vegetables.

We recently demonstrated that the cinchona alkaloids are examples of INHIBIT and combinatorial OR-INHIBIT logic gates in water (Agius and Magri, 2023). Among the examined alkaloids was quinine 15, the two century old, anti-malarial, and gold standard for measuring fluorescence quantum yields (Φ_f = 0.55). The four cinchona alkaloids are all commercially available, so there was no need for synthetic effort, unlike the situation for the first INHIBIT logic gate (Gunnlaugsson et al., 2000) and many other INHIBIT logic gates reviewed (Souto and Dias, 2023). Remarkably, the design concepts of PET and ICT are intrinsically found within the framework of 15. Protonation of the azabicyclo shuts off a PET pathway, while a second protonation at the quinoline nitrogen atom induces a large fluorescence enhancement. The second input is Cl⁻, Br⁻, or I⁻, which disables the emission by collisional quenching. This approach is not the modern ideal for detecting an analyte, yet it remains an applied method used in hospitals for blood diagnostics (Tusa and He, 2005) and for tears via contact lenses (Badugu et al., 2020).

We have also reported a polymeric H⁺, Cl⁻ driven INHIBIT gate 16 based on quinidine by exploiting the vinyl moiety as a linker with acrylamide (Agius and Magri, 2021). The copolymer conserved the fluorescence properties of the quinidine monomer with a 185-fold enhancement and Φ_f = 0.56 in water. Future lab-on-a-polymer (Ueda et al., 2007) systems can be envisioned by incorporating additional monomer receptor units. We are optimistic that further screening of fluorescent natural products from a molecular logic viewpoint should reveal other naturally occurring fluorescent switches and logic gates.

3 Challenges and future directions

The detection of three chemical species simultaneously by a single molecule remains a significant challenge. After almost two decades since the first proof-of-concept (Magri et al., 2006a), the number of lab-on-molecules that can detect a congregation of analytes is only a handful. A common rhetoric in the introduction of many sources of literature is that the synthesis of large molecules with one binding site per analyte is too laborious, expensive, and time-consuming. So why are many researchers not so interested in creating sophisticated functional molecules that can detect for three (or more) analytes? Well, of course, synthesis also requires some skill. Organic chemistry remains central to the enterprise of designing, synthesizing, and characterizing mostly carbon-based molecules (Callan et al., 2005). As stated, our observation is that organic chemists as a community, those at the higher end of molecular synthesis, have largely remained aloof from luminescent sensors and switches. An appeal of this Frontiers review, as done two decades ago, is to request this skill base, the creative hard-core organic chemists, to consider contributing to the challenges of luminescent sensors, molecular logic gates, and lab-on-a-molecule development.

As highlighted throughout this review, the majority of lab-on-a-molecule and multi-analyte sensing systems to date have tended to primarily detect for cations, which is understandable within the context of the historic progression of supramolecular and guest–host chemistry. A significant step forward would be for the lab-on-a-molecule that can detect variable combinations of cations, anions, and neutral molecules, and do so ideally in water, and in a competitive media environment.

Here are some ideas for developing the next generation of lab-on-a-molecule systems:

1. More anion receptors have to be made readily available. Numerous cation receptors, such as benzocrown ethers, cyclams, lariat ethers, and cryptands, are commercially available. A successful approach has been to exploit readily available multi-protonable receptors, such as cryptands (Kataev, 2003), or polyamines (Czarnik, 1994) as receptors for inorganic anions and nucleotides.

2. Known ditopic fluorescent logic gates (de Silva et al., 2003; Koskela et al., 2005; Shin et al., 2017) in the scientific literature provide a template for the extension of known logic gates into a lab-on-a-molecule by sequentially adding a third receptor (Magri and de Silva, 2010). After all, the first two-input AND logic gates (de Silva et al., 1993; de Silva et al., 1997b) were an amalgamation of pH (de Silva and Rupasinghe, 1985) and alkaline metal (de Silva and de Silva, 1986) fluorescent indicators (YES logic gates).

3. The exploitation and adoption of one-pot and multicomponent synthesis strategies (Brandner and Müller, 2023) could improve the efficiency and diversity of lab-on-a-molecules.

4. Fluorescent natural products (Duval and Duplais, 2017; Sung and Seok Lee, 2023) can become a source of inspiration as scaffolds for lab-on-a-molecules as has been the case with medicines for well over a century.

Author contributions

DM: Manuscript writing—original draft and review and editing.

Funding

The author declares that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Financial support is gratefully acknowledged from the University of Malta; The Ministry for Education, Sport, Youth, Research and Innovation; and the Malta Council for Science and Technology.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abbott, E. A. (1950). Flatland: a romance of many dimensions. Oxford: Blackwell.

Google Scholar

Agius, N., and Magri, D. C. (2021). A fluorescent polymeric INHIBIT logic gate based on the natural product quinidine. New J. Chem. 45, 14360–14363. doi:10.1039/d1nj03045k

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Agius, N., and Magri, D. C. (2023). Cinchona alkaloids – acid, anion-driven fluorescent INHIBIT logic gates with a receptor₁–fluorophore– spacer–receptor₂ format and PET and ICT mechanisms. RSC Adv. 13, 13505–13510. doi:10.1039/d3ra02704j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andréasson, J., and Pischel, U. (2010). Smart molecules at work— mimicking advanced logic operations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 174–188. doi:10.1039/b820280j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andréasson, J., and Pischel, U. (2018). Molecules for security measures: from keypad locks to advanced communication protocols. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 2266–2279. doi:10.1039/C7CS00287D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Badugu, R., Szmacinski, H., Reece, E. A., Jeng, B. H., and Lakowicz, J. R. (2020). Fluorescent contact lens for continuous non-invasive measurements of sodium and chloride ion concentrations in tears. Anal. Biochem. 608, 113902. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2020.113902

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bourson, J., Pouget, J., and Valeur, B. (1993). Ion-responsive fluorescent compounds. 4. Effect of cation binding on the photophysical properties of a coumarin linked to monoaza- and diaza-crown ethers. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 4552–4557. doi:10.1021/j100119a050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bozdemir, O. A., Guliyev, R., Buyukcakir, O., Selcuk, S., Koleman, S., Gulseren, G., et al. (2010). Selective manipulation of ICT and PET processes in styryl-bodipy derivatives: applications in molecular logic and fluorescence sensing of metal ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8029–8036. doi:10.1021/ja1008163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brandner, L., and Müller, T. J. J. (2023). Multicomponent synthesis of chromophores – the one-pot approach to functional π-systems. Front. Chem. 11, 1124209. doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1124209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Callan, J. F., de Silva, A. P., and Magri, D. C. (2005). Luminescent sensors and switches in the early 21st century. Tetrahedron 61, 8551–8588. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2005.05.043

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, K., and Schmittel, M. (2013). An iridium(iii)-based lab-on-a-molecule for cysteine/homocysteine and tryptophan using triple-channel interrogation. Analyst 138, 6742–6745. doi:10.1039/C3AN01530K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, K., Shu, Q., and Schmittel, M. (2015). Design strategies for lab-on-a-molecule probes and orthogonal sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 136–160. doi:10.1039/c4cs00263f

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Czarnik, A. W. (1994). Chemical communication in water using fluorescent chemosensors. Acc. Chem. Res. 27, 302–308. doi:10.1021/ar00046a003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P. (2013). Molecular logic-based computation. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., and de Silva, S. A. (1986). Fluorescent signalling crown ethers; ’switching on’ of fluorescence by alkali metal ion recognition and binding in situ. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1709–1710. doi:10.1039/C39860001709

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., Dixon, I. M., Gunaratne, H. Q. N., Gunnlaugsson, T., Maxwell, P. R. S., and Rice, T. E. (1999). Integration of logic functions and sequential operation of gates at the molecular-scale. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1393–1394. doi:10.1021/ja982909b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., Gunaratne, H. Q. N., Gunnlaugsson, T., Huxley, A. J. M., McCoy, C. P., Rademacher, J. T., et al. (1997a). Signaling recognition events with fluorescent sensors and switches. Chem. Rev. 97, 1515–1566. doi:10.1021/cr960386p

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., Gunaratne, H. Q. N., and McCoy, C. P. (1993). A molecular photoionic AND gate based on fluorescent signalling. Nature 364, 42–44. doi:10.1038/364042a0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., Gunaratne, H. Q. N., and McCoy, C. P. (1997b). Molecular photoionic and logic gates with bright fluorescence and “Off−On” digital action. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7891–7892. doi:10.1021/ja9712229

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., McClean, G. D., and Pagliari, S. (2003). Direct detection of ion pairs by fluorescence enhancement. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2010–2011. doi:10.1039/B305262A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., Moody, T. S., and Wright, G. D. (2009). Fluorescent PET (Photoinduced Electron Transfer) sensors as potent analytical tools. Analyst 134, 2385–2393. doi:10.1039/B912527M

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., and Rupasinghe, R. A. D. D. (1985). A new class of fluorescent pH indicators based on photo-induced electron transfer. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1669–1670. doi:10.1039/C39850001669

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Silva, A. P., and Uchiyama, S. (2007). Molecular logic and computing. Nat. Nanotech 2, 399–410. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, J. J., Hu, M. M., Fan, J., and Peng, X. J. (2012). Fluorescent chemodosimeters using ‘‘mild’’ chemical events for the detection of small anions and cations in biological and environmental media. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 4511–4535. doi:10.1039/c2cs00004k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duval, R., and Duplais, C. (2017). Fluorescent natural products as probes and tracers in biology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 34, 161–193. doi:10.1039/C6NP00111D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erbas-Cakmak, S., Gunnlaugsson, T., Kolemen, S., James, T. D., Sedgwick, A. C., Yoon, J., et al. (2018). Molecular logic gates: the past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 2228–2248. doi:10.1039/C7CS00491E

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrugia, T. J., and Magri, D. C. (2013). Pourbaix sensors’: a new class of fluorescent pE–pH molecular AND logic gates based on photoinduced electron transfer. New. J. Chem. 37, 148–151. doi:10.1039/c2nj40732a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gunnlaugsson, T., MacDónail, D. A., and Parker, D. (2000). Luminescent molecular logic gates: the two-input inhibit (INH) function. Chem. Commun. 2000, 93–94. doi:10.1039/A908951I

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hettie, K. S., Klockow, J. L., and Glass, T. E. (2014). Three-input logic gates with potential applications for neuronal imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4877–4880. doi:10.1021/ja501211v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiménez, D., Martínez-Máñez, R., Sancenón, F., and Soto, J. (2004). Electro-optical triple-channel sensing of metal cations via multiple signalling patterns. Tetrahedron Lett. 45, 1257–1259. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2003.11.123

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kataev, E. A. (2023). Converting pH probes into ‘‘turn-on’’ fluorescent receptors for anions. Chem. Commun. 59, 1717–1727. doi:10.1039/d2cc06194e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Konry, T., and Walt, D. R. (2009). Intelligent medical diagnostics via molecular logic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 13232–13233. doi:10.1021/ja905125b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koskela, S. J. M., Fyles, T. M., and James, T. D. (2005). A ditopic fluorescent sensor for potassium fluoride. Chem. Commun., 945–947. doi:10.1039/B415522J

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, M., Guo, Z., Zhu, W., Marken, F., and James, T. D. (2015). A redox-activated fluorescence switch based on a ferrocene–fluorophore–boronic ester conjugate. Chem. Commun. 51, 1293–1296. doi:10.1039/C4CC07891H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ling, J., Daly, B., Silverson, V. A. D., and de Silva, A. P. (2015). Taking baby steps in molecular logic-based computation. Chem. Commun. 51, 8403–8409. doi:10.1039/C4CC10000J

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magri, D. C. (2021). Logical sensing with fluorescent molecular logic gates based on photoinduced electron transfer. Coord. Chem. Rev. 426, 213598. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213598

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magri, D. C., Brown, G. J., McClean, G. D., and de Silva, A. P. (2006a). Communicating chemical congregation: a molecular and logic gate with three chemical inputs as a “lab-on-a-molecule” prototype. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 4950–4951. doi:10.1021/ja058295+

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magri, D. C., and Camilleri, A. A. (2023). A white light emitting reconfigurable pyrazoline-naphthalimide logic gate with magnesium, sodium and proton inputs. Chem. Commun. 59, 4459–4462. doi:10.1039/d2cc06049c

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magri, D. C., Camilleri Fava, M., and Mallia, C. J. (2014). A sodium-enabled ‘Pourbaix sensor’: a three-input AND logic gate as a ‘lab-on-a-molecule’ for monitoring Na⁺, pH and pE. Chem. Commun. 50, 1009–1011. doi:10.1039/c3cc48075e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magri, D. C., Coen, G. D., Boyd, R. L., and de Silva, A. P. (2006b). Consolidating molecular AND logic with two chemical inputs. Anal. Chim. Acta. 568, 156–160. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Magri, D. C., and de Silva, A. P. (2010). From PASS 1 to YES to AND logic: building parallel processing into molecular logic gates by sequential addition of receptors. New J. Chem. 34, 476–481. doi:10.1039/b9nj00564a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McLaughlin, B., Surender, E. M., Wright, G. D., Daly, B., and de Silva, A. P. (2018). Lighting-up protein–ligand interactions with fluorescent PET (photoinduced electron transfer) sensor designs. Chem. Commun. 54, 1319–1322. doi:10.1039/C7CC05929A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Millman, J., and Grabel, A. (1988). Microelectronics. London: McGraw-Hill. doi:10.1007/3-540-57565-0_78

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rettig, W. (2005). Photoinduced charge separation via twisted intramolecular charge transfer states. Top. Cur. Chem. 169, 253–299. doi:10.1007/3-540-57565-0_78

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rout, B., Milko, P., Iron, M. A., Motiei, L., and Margulies, D. (2013). Authorizing multiple chemical passwords by a combinatorial molecular keypad lock. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15330–15333. doi:10.1021/ja4081748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rout, B., Motiei, L., and Margulies, D. (2014). Combinatorial fluorescent molecular sensors: the road to differential sensing at the molecular level. Synlett. 25, 1050–1054. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1340639

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rout, B., Unger, L., Armony, G., Iron, M. A., and Margulies, D. (2012). Medication detection by a combinatorial fluorescent molecular sensor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 12477–12481. doi:10.1002/anie.201206374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sarkar, T., Selvakumar, K., Motiei, L., and Margulies, D. (2016). Message in a molecule. Nat. Commun. 7, 11374–11382. doi:10.1038/ncomms11374

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scerri, G. J., Spiteri, J. C., and Magri, D. C. (2021). Pourbaix sensors in polyurethane molecular logic-based coatings for early detection of corrosion. Mater. Adv. 2, 434–439. doi:10.1039/d0ma00839g

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scerri, G. S., Spiteri, J. C., Mallia, C. J., and Magri, D. C. (2019). A lab-on-a-molecule with an enhanced fluorescent readout on detection of three chemical species. Chem. Commun. 55, 4961–4964. doi:10.1039/c9cc00924h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmittel, M., and Lin, H.-W. (2007). Quadruple-Channel sensing: a molecular sensor with a single type of receptor site for selective and quantitative multi-ion analysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 893–896. doi:10.1002/anie.200603362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, J.-H., Hong, J.-H., Ko, M.-S., and Cho, D.-G. (2017). Fluorescent and cooperative ion pair receptor based on tolan for Na⁺ (or Li⁺) and HSO₄⁻: logic AND gate. Chem. Commun. 53, 11414–11417. doi:10.1039/C7CC06907C

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souto, F. T., and Dias, G. G. (2023). Input selection drives molecular logic gate design. Analytica 4, 456–499. doi:10.3390/analytica4040033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spiteri, J. C., Denisov, S. A., Jonusauskas, G., Klejna, S., Szaciłowski, K., McClenaghan, N. D., et al. (2018). Molecular engineering of logic gate types by module rearrangement in ‘Pourbaix Sensors’: the effect of excited-state electric fields. Org. Biomol. Chem. 16, 6195–6201. doi:10.1039/c8ob00485d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suna, G., GunduzTopal, S. S., Ozturk, T., Karakus¸, E., and Karakuş, E. (2023). A unique triple–channel fluorescent probe for discriminative detection of cyanide, hydrazine, and hypochlorite. Talanta 257, 124365. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124365

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sung, D.-B., and Seok Lee, J. (2023). Natural-product-based fluorescent probes: recent advances and applications. RSC Med. Chem. 14, 412–432. doi:10.1039/D2MD00376G

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szaciłowski, K. (2012). Infochemistry. Chichester, UK: Wiley VCH.

Google Scholar

Tusa, J. K., and He, H. (2005). Critical care analyzer with fluorescent optical chemosensors for blood analytes. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 2640–2647. doi:10.1039/B503172A

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ueda, M., Hara, Y., Sakai, T., Yoshida, R., Takai, M., and Ito, Y. (2007). Characterization of a self-oscillating polymer with periodic soluble-insoluble changes. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 45, 1578–1588. doi:10.1002/polb.21148

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vella Refalo, M., Farrugia, N. V., Johnson, A. D., Klejna, S., Szaciłowski, K., and Magri, D. C. (2019). Fluorimetric naphthalimide-based polymer logic beads responsive to acidity and oxidisability. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 15225–15232. doi:10.1039/c9tc05545b

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vella Refalo, M., Spiteri, J. C., and Magri, D. C. (2018). Covalent attachment of a fluorescent ‘Pourbaix sensor’ onto a polymer bead for sensing in water. New J. Chem. 42, 16474–16477. doi:10.1039/c8nj03224f

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wright, A. T., and Anslyn, E. V. (2006). Differential receptor arrays and assays for solution-based molecular recognition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 14–28. doi:10.1039/B505518K

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wright, G. D., Yao, C. Y., Moody, T. S., and de Silva, A. P. (2020). Fluorescent molecular logic gates based on photoinduced electron transfer (PET) driven by a combination of atomic and biomolecular inputs. Chem. Commun. 56, 6838–6841. doi:10.1039/d0cc00478b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, P., Miao, L.-N., Wang, H.-F., Shao, X.-G., and Yan, X.-P. (2011). A multidimensional sensing device for the discrimination of proteins based on manganese-doped ZnS quantum dots. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 8118–8121. doi:10.1002/anie.201101882

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Wang, K.-Z., and Yan, D. (2017). Smart luminescent coordination polymers toward multimode logic gates: time-resolved, tribochromic and excitation-dependent fluorescence/phosphorescence emission. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 17399–17407. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b00594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, C. Y., and de Silva, A. P. (2023). A tool, an app and a field: fluorescent PET sensors, blood electrolyte analysis and molecular logic as products of supramolecular photoscience from northern Ireland and Sri Lanka. ChemPlusChem 88, e202200362. doi:10.1002/cplu.202200362

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, C. Y., Lin, H. Y., Crory, H. S. N., and de Silva, A. P. (2020). Supra-molecular agents running tasks intelligently (SMARTI): recent developments in molecular logic-based computation. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 5, 1325–1353. doi:10.1039/D0ME00082E

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhi, L., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Liu, W., Zhang, H., Chena, F., et al. (2015). White emission magnetic nanoparticles as chemosensors for sensitive colorimetric and ratiometric detection, and degradation of ClO⁻ and SCN⁻ in aqueous solutions based on a logic gate approach. Nanoscale 7, 11712–11719. doi:10.1039/C5NR02307F

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar