Development of a monoclonal antibody and a lateral-flow device for the rapid detection of a Mucorales-specific biomarker

Mucoromycosis is a highly aggressive angio-invasive disease of humans caused by fungi in the zygomycete order, Mucorales. While Rhizopus arrhizus is the principal agent of mucoromycosis, other Mucorales fungi including Apophysomyces, Cunninghamella, Lichtheimia, Mucor, Rhizomucor and Syncephalastrum are able to cause life-threatening rhino-orbital-cerebral, pulmonary, gastro-intestinal and necrotising cutaneous infections in humans. Diagnosis of the disease currently relies on non-specific CT, lengthy and insensitive culture from invasive biopsy, and time-consuming histopathology of tissue samples. At present, there are no rapid antigen tests that detect Mucorales-specific biomarkers of infection, and which allow point-of-care diagnosis of mucoromycosis. Here, we report the development of an IgG2b monoclonal antibody (mAb), TG11, which binds to extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) antigens of between 20 kDa and 250 kDa secreted during hyphal growth of Mucorales fungi. The mAb is Mucorales-specific and does not cross-react with other yeasts and molds of clinical importance including Aspergillus, Candida, Cryptococcus, Fusarium, Lomentospora and Scedosporium species. Using the mAb, we have developed a Competitive lateral-flow device that allows rapid (30 min) detection of the EPS biomarker in human serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), with a limit of detection (LOD) in human serum of ~100 ng/mL serum (~224.7 pmol/L serum). The LFD therefore provides a potential novel opportunity for detection of mucoromycosis caused by different Mucorales species.

Mucoromycosis is associated with high rates of mortality, with an overall all-cause mortality rate of 54% (Roden et al., 2005).Furthermore, survivors of ROCM are often left with severe facial disfigurement due to the aggressive surgery needed to contain rapidly progressive infections (Sen et al., 2021).The disease is especially problematic in low-to middle-income countries (LMIC), where limited access to well-resourced and appropriately-equipped diagnostic facilities delays diagnosis and treatment (Rudramurthy et al., 2021;Thornton, 2023).There is therefore an urgent need for simple, rapid and accurate diagnostic tests for the disease that can be performed at point-of-care.Lateralflow immunoassays are ideally suited to point-of-care detection of fungal infections in resource-limited settings (Thornton, 2020;Osaigbovo and Bongomin, 2021;Thornton, 2023), and might help to improve the speed and accuracy of mucoromycosis detection compared to insensitive and time-consuming culture and histopathology, the cornerstones of detection in LMIC countries (Rudramurthy et al., 2021;Thornton, 2023).
At present, there are no antigen biomarker tests which allow rapid, sensitive and specific detection of Mucorales species (Skiada et al., 2020;Lamoth, 2023), and their differentiation from other fungal pathogens such as Aspergillus, Candida, Cryptococcus, Fusarium and Scedosporium (Marques et al., 2011;Obradovic-Tomasev et al., 2014;Skiada et al., 2020;Marino et al., 2023).Despite this, we recently reported the development of a monoclonal antibody (mAb), KC9, specific to R. arrhizus, and its incorporation into a lateral-flow device (KC9-LFD) for rapid detection of an extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) biomarker of the pathogen in human serum and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (Davies and Thornton, 2022).While sensitive and simple to perform, the test detects R. arrhizus only, and so is unable to detect the other Mucorales fungi capable of causing mucoromycosis in humans.
In this paper, we report the development of a murine mAb, TG11, and a Competitive LFD for the detection of a Mucoralesspecific EPS biomarker in human serum and BAL.We show that the pan-Mucorales test, when combined with a Cube reader, has a limit of detection (LOD) of ~100 ng/mL serum (~224.7 pmol/L serum).This is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that a Mucorales-specific mAb has been developed and used in a rapid point-of-care test (POCT) for detection of these lifethreatening pathogens.

Ethics statement
Hybridoma work described in this study was conducted under a UK Home Office Project License, and was reviewed by the institution's Animal Welfare Ethical Review Board (AWERB) for approval.The work was carried out in accordance with The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Directive 2010/63/EU, and followed all the Codes of Practice which reinforce this law, including all elements of housing, care, and euthanasia of the animals.

Production of hybridomas and screening by indirect ELISA
Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) were prepared from 6-d-old culture fluids using the method described previously (Davies and Thornton, 2022).For hybridoma production, the immunogen comprised a 1 mg/mL solution of EPS from Lichtheimia corymbifera (strain CBS109940), with 6-week-old BALB/c white mice each given four intra-peritoneal injections (300 µL per injection) of immunogen at 2-week intervals, and a single booster injection 5 days before fusion.Hybridoma cells were produced by the method described elsewhere (Thornton, 2001), and monoclonal antibody (mAb)-producing clones identified in indirect ELISA tests by using 20 mg EPS/mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na 2 HPO 4 , 1.5 mM KH 2 PO 4 , pH 7.2) immobilised to the wells of Maxisorp microtiter plates (Nunc) at 50 µL/well.Wells containing immobilised antigen were incubated with 50 µL of mAb hybridoma tissue culture supernatant (TCS) for 1 h, after which wells were washed three times, for 5 min each, with   PBST (PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20).Goat anti-mouse polyvalent immunoglobulin (G, A, M) peroxidase conjugate (PA1-84388, Invitrogen), diluted 1:5000 in PBST, was added to the wells and incubated for a further hour.The plates were washed with PBST as described, given a final 5 min wash with PBS, and bound antibody visualised by incubating wells with tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) substrate solution for 30 min, after which reactions were stopped by the addition of 3 M H 2 SO 4 .Absorbance values were determined at 450 nm using a microplate reader (infinite F50, Tecan Austria GmbH).Control wells were incubated with tissue culture medium (TCM) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; FCS-SA, Biosera) only.All incubation steps were performed at 23°C in sealed plastic bags.The threshold for detection of the antigen in ELISA was determined from control means (2 x TCM absorbance values).These values were consistently in the range of 0.050-0.100.Consequently, absorbance values ≥0.100 were considered as positive for the detection of antigen.

Determination of Ig class and subcloning procedure
The Ig class of mAbs was determined by using antigenmediated indirect ELISA (Thornton, 2001).Wells of microtiter plates coated with 20 mg EPS/mL PBS were incubated successively with hybridoma TCS for 1 h, followed by goat anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM or IgA-specific antiserum (ISO-2, Sigma) diluted 1:3000 in PBST for 30 min, and rabbit anti-goat peroxidase conjugate (A5420, Sigma) diluted 1:1000 for a further 30 min.Bound antibody was visualised with TMB substrate as described.Hybridoma cell lines were sub-cloned three times by limiting dilution, and cell lines were grown in bulk in a non-selective medium, preserved by slowly freezing in FBS/dimethyl sulfoxide (92:8 v/v), and stored in liquid N 2 .

Antibody purification and enzyme conjugation
Hybridoma TCS of mAb TG11 was harvested by centrifugation at 2,147 x g for 40 min at 4°C, followed by filtration through a 0.8 mM cellulose acetate filter (10462240, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, UK).Culture supernatant was loaded onto a HiTrap Protein A column (17-0402-01, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) using a peristaltic pump P-1 (18-1110-91, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) with a low pulsation flow of 1 mL/min.Columns were equilibrated with 10 mL of PBS, and column-bound antibody was eluted with 5 mL of 0.1 M glycine-HCl buffer (pH 2.5) with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/ min.The buffer of the purified antibody was exchanged to PBS using a disposable PD-10 desalting column (17-0851-01, GE Healthcare Life Sciences).Following purification, the antibody was sterile filtered with a 0.24 µm syringe filter (85037-574-44, Sartorius) and stored at 4°C.Antibody purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and gel staining using Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific).Protein A-purified mAb TG11 was conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for ELISA studies using a Lightning-Link horseradish peroxidase conjugation kit (701-0000; Bio-Techne Ltd.), or to alkaline phosphatase (AKP) for western blotting studies using a Lightning-Link alkaline phosphatase conjugation kit (702-0010; Bio-Techne Ltd.).

Production of antigen in vitro
For antigen production studies, fungi were grown in liquid YNB +G medium for 72 h at 30°C with shaking (100 rpm) using the method described previously (Davies and Thornton, 2022).Culture fluids were filtered through Miracloth, and then stored at -20°C prior to immunoassay by western blotting and direct ELISA.
For colony blots, MEA was inoculated centrally with 5 mL of a 10 3 spores/mL spore suspension of L. corymbifera (strain CBS109940) and incubated for 16 h at 30°C, after which the colony was overlayed with PVDF membrane (162-0175, Bio-Rad) for 8 h to bind extracellular antigens.The membrane was removed and discarded, the colony incubated for a further 16 h, and the blotting procedure repeated.The membrane was blocked and processed with TG11-AKP conjugate as described for western blotting.

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting
Sodium-dodecyl-sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was carried out using 4-20% gradient polyacrylamide gels (4561094, Bio-Rad) under denaturing conditions.Antigens in EPS preparations and culture filtrates were separated electrophoretically at 165 V, and pre-stained markers (1610377, Bio-Rad) were used for molecular weight determinations.For western blotting, separated antigens were transferred electrophoretically onto a PVDF membrane for 2 h at 75 V, and the membrane was blocked for 16 h at 4°C in PBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA.Blocked membranes were incubated with TG11-AKP conjugate diluted 1:15,000 (v/v) in PBS containing 0.5% (w/v) BSA (PBSA) for 2 h at 23°C.Membranes were washed three times with PBS, once with PBST and bound antibody visualised by incubation in substrate solution.Reactions were stopped by immersing membranes in dH 2 O, and membranes were then air dried between sheets of Whatman filter paper.Monoclonal antibodies JF5 (Thornton, 2008), MC3 (Morad et al., 2018), ED7 (Al-Maqtoofi and Thornton, 2016) and HG12 (Thornton, 2009) were used as controls to confirm the presence of extracellular immuno-reactive antigens in Aspergillus, Candida, Fusarium and Scedosporium culture filtrates and EPS preparations, respectively.The anti-glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) mAb 18B7 (MABF2069, Sigma) was used to confirm the presence of immuno-reactive capsular polysaccharide of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Direct ELISA
For direct ELISA, wells containing immobilised antigen were incubated with 50 µL of a 1:2000 (v/v) dilution of TG11-HRP conjugate in PBST for 1 h followed by TMB substrate solution for 30 min.All washing steps were as described for the indirect ELISA.

TG11 lateral-flow device LFD configuration
The TG11 Competitive lateral-flow device (TG11-LFD) was manufactured by Lateral Dx (Alloa, Scotland, UK).The test consisted of Kenosha 75 mm backing card; 8950, 222, and 1281 conjugate, top and sample pads, respectively; and a CN95 (12 mm) nitrocellulose membrane.The test (T) line consisted of EPS from the L. corymbifera strain, CBS109940, at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ mL, while the internal test control (C) line consisted of goat antimouse IgG (Arista Biologicals) at a concentration of 0.25 mg/mL.

LFD specificity
Specificity of the TG11-LFD was determined using purified EPS preparations and with filtrates from 72-h-old YNB+G shake cultures of mucoralean and non-mucoralean yeasts and molds of clinical importance.
For EPS, 100 mL of running buffer (PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20) containing 50 mg/mL of EPS was added to the TG11-LFD, and T and C line intensities were recorded after 30 min as artificial units (a.u.) using a Cube reader (Davies and Thornton, 2022).The threshold value for test positivity using EPS was determined from the negative control (running buffer only), which was consistently ≥400 a.u.Consequently, a T line value below the threshold value (400 a.u.) showed a positive test result.
For culture filtrates, samples were mixed 1:10 (v/v) with running buffer and 100 mL was added to the TG11-LFD.The intensities of the T and C lines were recorded after 30 min as artificial units (a.u.) as described.The threshold value for test positivity was determined from the T line values of culture filtrates for non-Mucorales yeasts and molds, which were consistently ≥400 a.u.Consequently, a T line value below the threshold value (400 a.u.) showed a positive TG11-LFD test result.The Rhizopus arrhizus-specific KC9-LFD (Davies and Thornton, 2022) was used for specificity comparisons, with the threshold value for test positivity determined from the T line values of culture filtrates from fungi other than R. arrhizus.These values were consistently ≥700 a.u.Consequently, a T line value below the threshold value (700 a.u.) showed a positive KC9-LFD test result.

LFD tests with human serum and BAL
Normal serum from healthy AB blood group males (H6914, Sigma) was spiked with purified EPS from the L. corymbifera strain, CBS109940, and was stored at -20°C prior to use.On thawing, the serum was mixed 1:1 (v/v) with citrate-dextrose solution (ACD; 22 g/L sodium citrate (C3434, Sigma), 7.3 g/L citric acid (C0759, Sigma) and 24.5 g/L D-(+)-glucose, pH~5.0),heated at 100°C for 5 min in a heating block, and then centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 x g.The clear supernatant was mixed 1:1 (v/v) with serum running buffer (SRB; PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 and 0.05% (v/v) Triton X-305).One hundred-mL was added to the TG11-LFD, and the intensities of the T and C lines were recorded after 30 min as artificial units (a.u.) using the Cube reader.
Normal BAL from a healthy 59-year-old male (HUMANBAL-0101312, BioIVT) was spiked with purified EPS from the Rhizopus arrhizus var.arrhizus strain, CBS112.07, and was stored at -20°C prior to use.On thawing, the BAL was mixed 1:10 (v/v) with SRB and the resultant 100 mL containing 100 mg EPS/mL was added to the TG11-LFD.Normal BAL mixed 1:10 (v/v) with SRB, and SRB alone, acted as negative controls, with the intensities of the T and C lines recorded after 30 min as artificial units (a.u.) using the Cube reader.

Statistical analysis
Numerical data were analysed using a Student's t-test (independent, two-tailed) to determine statistical significance.

Production of hybridomas and mAb isotyping
A single hybridoma fusion was performed, and 420 hybridoma cell lines were tested in indirect ELISA tests for recognition of the immunogen.Ten cell lines produced EPS-reactive antibodies of the immunoglobulin classes G2b (IgG2b) or M (IgM).The cell line TG11 (an IgG2b) was selected for further evaluation due to its isotype and broad recognition of Mucorales fungi, but lack of crossreactivity with non-Mucorales fungi.

Production of antigen in vitro
A study of antigen production by Lichtheimia corymbifera, strain CBS109940, in YNB+G shake culture showed that growth of the pathogen plateaued after 72 h (Figure 1A).Immunoassay of culture filtrates showed that the TG11 antigen was secreted into the culture medium and was first detectable by ELISA (Figure 1B), western blot (Figure 1C) and TG11-LFD (Figures 1D, E) 48 h postinoculation.In colony immuno-blots, extracellular production of the TG11 antigen was associated with the growing edge of the colony (Figure 1F).

Culture filtrates
Western blotting studies of 72-h-old culture filtrates showed that mAb TG11 is specific to Mucorales fungi, binding to antigens with molecular weights of between 25 kDa to 250 kDa (Figures 2A-F), and with an additional immuno-reactive antigen of ~25 kDa in strains of Rhizopus arrhizus var.arrhizus (Figure 1B), Mucor circinelloides CBS124429 (Figure 1E) and Mucor indicus CBS120.08 (Figure 1E).A single immuno-reactive antigen of ~20kDa was evident in culture filtrates of Rhizopus homothallicus CBS336.62 (Figure 2D).There was weak binding with culture filtrates from Rhizopus oligosporus strain Tempeh (Figure 2D), A p o p h y s o m y c e s e l e g a n s C B S 4 7 7 .7 8 ( F i g u r e 2 F ) and Apophysomyces variabilis CBS658.93 (Figure 2F), and no binding to antigens in culture filtrates of Apophysomyces ossiformis CBS125533 or Apophysomyces mexicanus CBS136361 (Figure 1F).There was no cross-reaction of mAb TG11 with antigens in culture filtrates from the unrelated molds Aspergillus fumigatus strain Af293 and Aspergillus flavus strain 114B (Figure 2C), the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans CBS8710 (Figure 2D), the molds Fusarium oxysporum CBS167.30and Scedosporium aurantiacum CBS121926 (Figure 2D), the yeast Candida albicans strain SC5314 (Figure 2E), and the mold terreus CBS601.65 (Figure 2F), despite the presence of extracellular immuno-reactive antigens in the culture filtrates of these fungi (Supplementary Figure 1).
In comparison to the KC9-LFD (Davies and Thornton, 2022), which was specific to antigens in culture filtrates of the Rhizopus arrhizus strains only (Table 1), the TG11-LFD is pan-Mucoralesspecific, recognising antigens in culture filtrates from all of the Mucorales fungi tested (Table 1).There was displacement of the test (T) lines in all Mucorales TG11-LFD tests, with Cube reader values below the threshold value for test positivity (400 a.u.).There was no cross-reactivity of the TG11-LFD test with non-Mucorales yeasts and molds (Table 1), with a.u.values exceeding the 400 a.u.threshold value.

Extracellular polysaccharides
In direct ELISA studies, mAb TG11 reacted with EPS preparations from all of the Mucorales fungi tested (Figure 3A), with absorbance values for all species exceeding the threshold value   3D), with T line values below the threshold value (400 a.u.) for test positivity.There was no cross-reaction of mAb TG11 with EPS samples from the unrelated mold pathogens in either the western blotting (Figures 3B, C), LFD (Figures 3D, 4B) or ELISA (Figure 4A) immunoassay formats, despite the presence immuno-reactive antigens in these EPS preparations (Figure 4C).

Limit of detection (LOD) in human serum and compatibility with human BAL
Using the Cube reader, the LOD of the TG11-LFD using human serum spiked with EPS from L. corymbifera, strain CBS109940, was shown to be ~100 ng EPS/mL serum (~224.7 pmol/L serum) (Figure 5A).The TG11-LFD is compatible with human BAL, showing a significant reduction in T line values using BAL spiked with EPS from the Rhizopus arrhizus var.arrhizus, strain CBS112.07,compared to the T line values for normal BAL and SRB only (Figures 5B, C).
The pan-Mucorales-specificity of mAb TG11 makes it a suitable candidate for incorporation into a rapid LFD test for detection of the Mucorales-specific EPS biomarker.While a pan-Mucorales mitochondrial rnl (encoding for large-subunit-ribosomal-RNA) gene has been shown to be a novel molecular marker for Mucorales fungi (Caramalho et al., 2019), and a Mucoralesspecific IgM mAb (WSSA-RA-1) which binds to intracellular cytoplasmic antigens of between 14 kDa and 110 kDa has previously been reported and used in the immunohistochemical detection of bovine mucoromycosis (Jensen et al., 1996), this is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that a pan-Mucoralesspecific mAb which binds to an extracellular antigenic Mucorales biomarker has been reported.Previously, we described the development of a Competitive LFD for the serological detection of Rhizopus arrhizus, the principal global agent of mucoromycosis in humans.The species-specific LFD employs a mAb, KC9, which binds to a single epitope present within a 15 kDa extracellular EPS antigen (Davies and Thornton, 2022).We have found that mAb TG11 similarly binds to a single epitope within larger 25 kDa to 250 kDa Mucorales antigens, necessitating its use in a Competitive lateral-flow immunoassay format.The Competitive immunoassay format is ideally suited to mAbs which bind to single epitopes, with Competitive LFDs finding widespread applicability in human medicine, environmental sciences, agriculture, and veterinary medicine, for the detection of pathogens, hormones, enzymes, chemicals, narcotic drugs, toxins, and pollutants (Andryukov, 2020;Davies and Thornton, 2022;Khelifa et al., 2022).
The Competitive TG11-LFD test described here relies on soluble antigen in the test sample (buffer, serum or BAL) displacing binding of the gold-conjugated TG11 mAb to purified L. corymbifera EPS present in the test (T) line; the response is therefore negatively correlated to the analyte concentration (the more analyte present, the weaker the signal, with no analyte giving the strongest signal).An advantage of the Competitive LFD format is that it does not suffer from false-negative prozone effects caused by high concentrations of the target antigen as seen in Sandwich LFD formats.Indeed, the cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) semiquantitative (SQ) lateral-flow assay now comprises a Competitive test line to counteract prozone effects (Tadeo et al., 2021).
Current detection of mucoromycosis relies on insensitive and time-consuming culture of fungi from biopsy samples, and on sophisticated laboratory-based PCR, MALDI-TOF, or enzymelinked immunospot (ELISpot) tests (Lackner et al., 2021;Lamoth, 2023;Thornton, 2023).Detection of mucoromycosis is not possible using the pan-fungal 1→3-b-D-glucan (BDG) test, since Mucorales fungi lack this carbohydrate in their cell walls.Nevertheless, the BDG test and Aspergillus-specific ELISA and LFD tests can be used to rule out aspergillosis, the most common differential diagnosis associated with mucoromycosis.The simplicity, speed, and low cost of LFDs makes them ideally suited to the detection of infectious diseases in low-to middle-income countries (Osaigbovo and Bongomin, 2021), and may aid in the point-of-care detection of mucoromycosis (Thornton, 2023).Currently, no mAb-based serodiagnostic LFD test exists for the specific detection of all infectious Mucorales fungi.A mAb (2DA6) and a lateral-flow immunoassay (LFIA) have been developed that recognise Mucorales species, but the mAb lacks specificity, cross-reacting with an epitope on a-1,6 mannans conserved among human pathogenic yeasts and filamentous fungi including Candida albicans and the angio-invasive moulds Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium (Burnham-Marusich et al., 2018).Despite this, the LFIA was able to detect cell wall fucomannan in BALf, serum, and urine samples from diabetic ketoacidotic and neutropenic mice following intratracheal challenge with Rhizopus delemar, L i c h t h e i m i a c o r y m b i f e r a , M u c o r c i r c i n e l l o i d e s a n d Cunninghamella bertholletiae (Orne et al., 2018), demonstrating the utility of carbohydrate biomarkers in the diagnosis of mucoromycosis, and their detection using lateral-flow technology.
A hallmark of mucoromycosis is extensive angio-invasion (Spellberg et al., 2005;Ibrahim et al., 2012;Skiada et al., 2020), which presents an opportunity for serological detection of circulating EPS biomarker.We therefore investigated the compatibility of the TG11-LFD with human serum as a minimally-invasive biofluid for biomarker detection.When combined with a simple serum pre-treatment step, we were able to detect the EPS biomarker in spiked serum samples.Furthermore, using a Cube reader, we were able to determine the limit of detection (LOD) of L. corymbifera EPS as ~100 ng/mL serum (~224.7 pmol/L serum), which is within the range of sensitivities for Competitive lateral-flow immunoassays (Di Nardo et al., 2021).The relevance of this LOD has yet to be determined with samples from patients with ROCM, pulmonary, cutaneous or disseminated mucoromycosis, but compatibility of the TG11-LFD with human serum and BAL provides an opportunity for clinical evaluation of the test in different disease backgrounds (e.g.neutropenia, ketoacidosis, diabetes).When combined with the serum-and BAL-compatible R. arrhizus-specific LFD test (Davies and Thornton, 2022), the possibility exists for comprehensive pointof-care detection of all clinically-relevant Mucorales species.

Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
FIGURE 1 Production of the TG11 antigen by Lichtheimia corymbifera CBS109940.(A) Dry weights of the pathogen over a 5-day experimental period.(B) ELISA and (C) western blots of culture filtrates using mAb TG11, with a significant (Student's t-test [p < 0.05]) increase in ELISA absorbance value at 48 h (indicated by *) compared to t = 0 h.(D) TG11-LFD test results using the culture filtrates, with test (T) line intensities measured as artificial units (a.u) using a Cube reader.There is a significant (Student's t-test [p < 0.05]) reduction in T line intensity at 48 h (indicated by *) and thereafter, corresponding to the displacement of T lines in LFD tests at 48h, 72h, 96h and 120h (E).The control (E) comprised running buffer (PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20) only.Data points (A, B) and bars (D) are the means of 3 replicates ± SE.All LFD tests had control (C) line scores of >600 a.u.using the Cube reader.(F) Colony immunoblot showing extracellular production of the TG11 antigen.Note the intense immuno-staining of extracellular antigen produced at the growing edge of the colony during active growth of the pathogen.Scale bar = 1cm.
FIGURE 2Western blots of culture filtrates from Mucorales fungi and from unrelated yeasts and molds of clinical importance using mAb TG11 (A-F).The corresponding results for TG11-LFD and KC9-LFD tests of culture filtrates are shown in Table1.
FIGURE 3 Reactivity of mAb TG11 with extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) from Mucorales spp.(A) ELISA of EPS samples from Mucorales species.The absorbance values of the negative control (phosphate buffered saline only) were consistently ≤0.100.Consequently, a threshold absorbance value of 0.100 was used for ELISA positivity.(B, C) Western blots of EPS samples (20 mg EPS/lane) from Mucorales spp.and from the unrelated humanpathogenic molds Aspergillus fumigatus Af293 and Scedosporium aurantiacum CBS121926.(D) Results of TG11-LFD tests using EPS samples (50 mg EPS/mL running buffer (PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20)) from Mucorales spp.and from the unrelated molds A. fumigatus Af293, S. aurantiacum CBS121926, Fusarium solani CBS224.34, and Lomentospora prolificans strain 3.1.The threshold T line value for test positivity is ≤400 a.u.Values above this threshold show a negative LFD test result, while values below the threshold show a positive LFD test result.Data points (A) and bars (D) are the means of 2 replicates ± SE.All LFD tests (D) had control (C) line scores of >600 a.u.using the Cube reader.
FIGURE 4Specificity of mAb TG11.(A) ELISA of EPS samples from unrelated molds of clinical importance.Note the lack of cross-reactivity of mAb TG11 with EPS from the unrelated molds A fumigatus Af293, S. aurantiacum CBS121926, Fusarium solani CBS224.34 and Lomentospora prolificans strain 3.1, compared to the positive control (Lichthemia corymbifera CBS109940).Data points are the means of 2 replicates ± SE, and the negative control consisted of phosphate buffered saline only.(B) Visual appraisal of TG11-LFD specificity using EPS samples (50 mg EPS/mL running buffer (PBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20)) from L. corymbifera CBS109940 and the unrelated molds.Note the complete displacement of the test (T) line with L. corymbifera EPS compared to the unrelated molds and negative control (running buffer only).Using the Cube reader, all LFD tests had control (C) line scores of >600 a.u.(C) Western blots of EPS preparations (10 mg EPS/lane) from the human-pathogenic molds A fumigatus Af293, S. aurantiacum CBS121926 and Fusarium solani CBS224.34,showing the presence of antigens reactive with the Aspergillus-specific mAb JF5(Thornton, 2008), Scedosporium-specific mAb HG12(Thornton, 2009), and Fusarium-specific mAb ED7 (Al-Maqtoofi andThornton, 2016), respectively.
FIGURE 5 TG11-LFD tests with human serum and BAL.(A) Sensitivity of the TG11-LFD using L. corymbifera CBS109940 EPS diluted into human serum.Using the Cube reader, there were sequential decreases in test (T) line intensities with increase in EPS concentrations between 0.03 mg and 50.00 mg EPS/mL serum, with a significant reduction (Student's t-test [p < 0.05]) at 0.10 mg EPS/mL serum (indicated by *) and thereafter compared to the control (normal serum only [0.00 mg EPS/mL serum]).Based on this result, the limit of detection (LOD) of the TG11-LFD is determined to be ~100 ng EPS/mL serum (~224.7 pmol/L serum).Data points are the means of 3 replicates ± SE, and all LFD tests had control (C) line scores of >600 a.u.(B) Visual appraisal of TG11-LFD compatibility with human BAL.Two replicate LFD tests with BAL samples spiked with 100 mg/mL EPS (BAL+EPS) from Rhizopus arrhizus var.arrhizus CBS112.07 are shown alongside replicate tests with normal BAL and serum running buffer (SRB) only.(C) Cube readings (a.u.) for the replicate LFD tests shown in (B).Each value is the mean a.u. of the 2 replicate tests ± SE, and all LFD tests had control (C) line scores of >600 a.u.using the Cube reader.There is a significant (Student's ttest [p < 0.05]) reduction (indicated by *) in the T line intensities of the BAL+EPS tests compared to both of the controls (normal BAL and SRB only), but no significant difference between the T line intensities of the two controls.

TABLE 1
Details of the fungi used in this study and results of TG11-LFD and KC9-LFD tests of culture filtrates.

Table 1 .
3 pmol/L to 54.9 pmol/L for the other Mucorales species tested.Western blotting studies with the EPS samples (Figures3B, C) showed strong reactivity of mAb TG11 with EPS from Lichtheimia spp., Cunninghamella bertholletiae CBS151.80,RhizomucorpusillusCBS102587, and Apophysomyces variabilis CBS658.93.Despite weaker reactions of mAb TG11 with the Mucor and Rhizopus EPS preparations in western blots (Figures3B, C), EPS from all of the Mucorales fungi gave strong TG11-LFD test results (Figure