Comparative genomic analysis of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients and retail meat

Introduction Staphylococcus aureus is a significant human pathogen that poses a threat to public health due to its association with foodborne contamination and a variety of infections. The factors contributing to the pathogenicity of S. aureus include virulence, drug resistance, and toxin production, making it essential to monitor their prevalence and genetic profiles. This study investigated and compared the genomic characteristics of S. aureus isolates from retail meat and patients in Saudi Arabia. Methods A total of 136 S. aureus isolates were obtained between October 2021 and June 2022:84 from patients and 53 from meat samples in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. S. aureus isolates were identified using conventional methods and MALDI-TOF MS, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was identified using VITEK2 and BD Phoenix systems. MRSA was confirmed phenotypically using chromogenic agar, and genotypically by detecting mecA. Genomic data were analyzed using BactopiaV2 pipeline, local BLAST, and MLST databases. Results Antibiotic resistance genes were prevalent in both meat and patient S. aureus isolates, with high prevalence of tet38, blaZ, and fosB. Notably, all S. aureus isolates from patients carried multidrug-resistant (MDR) genes, and a high percentage of S. aureus isolates from meat also harbored MDR genes. Phenotypically, 43% of the S. aureus isolates from meat and 100% of the patients’ isolates were MDR. Enterotoxin genes, including selX, sem, and sei, exhibited high compatibility between meat and patient S. aureus isolates. Virulence genes such as cap, hly/hla, sbi, and isd were found in all S. aureus isolates from both sources. Conclusion Our study established a genetic connection between S. aureus isolates from meat and patients, showing shared antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. The presence of these genes in meat derived isolates underscores its role as a reservoir. Genomic relatedness also suggests potential transmission of resistance between different settings. These findings emphasize the necessity for a comprehensive approach to monitor and control S. aureus infections in both animals and humans.


Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic bacterium found in humans and animals, especially food-producing animals (Kadariya et al., 2014).These bacteria can enter the food chain during collection, slaughter, processing, packaging, and storage (Wu et al., 2018).It has been detected in processed cheese, raw beef, camel meat, and dairy products in Saudi Arabia (El Sheikha, 2016).Moreover, it is a major pathogen that causes a wide range of infections in community and hospital settings (Turner et al., 2019).S. aureus has a variety of virulence factors that significantly influence its clinical manifestations (Jenul and Horswill, 2019).For instance, surface adhesins, including clumping factors and fibronectin-binding proteins, promote tissue adherence and contribute to skin and soft tissue infections (Algammal et al., 2020).Other virulence factors, including toxins such as hemolysins, leukocidins [e.g., panton-valentine leukocidin (PVL)], enterotoxins, and exfoliative toxins, lead to diverse clinical outcomes, ranging from severe skin infections to food poisoning and scalded skin syndrome (Algammal et al., 2020).Staphylococcal protein A (SPA) interferes with the host immune response and increases the severity of staphylococcal infection (Algammal et al., 2020).Proteins that promote biofilm production, such as polysaccharide intercellular adhesins, contribute to chronic infections and antibiotic resistance, particularly in cases involving medical devices (Singh et al., 2009).These virulence factors contribute to S. aureus pathogenicity (Jenul and Horswill, 2019).Enterotoxigenic S. aureus strains produce heat-stable staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), which are one of the main causes of global outbreaks of food poisoning (Pinchuk et al., 2010).To date, more than 20 SEs have been identified (Sankomkai et al., 2020).Classically known enterotoxins include the five enterotoxins encoded by sea, seb, sec, sed, and see (Sankomkai et al., 2020).Beyond food poisoning, these proteins can contribute to a broad range of symptoms ranging from mild toxin-mediated illnesses to life-threatening systemic diseases (Ahmad-Mansour et al., 2021).According to a recent report by the European Food Safety Authority, more than 40 staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) outbreaks, 400 cases, and 32 hospitalizations have been linked to S. aureus.aureus in the European Union by 2020 (The European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report, 2021).SFP accounts for approximately 241,000 hospitalizations annually due to illness in the United States (Scallan et al., 2018).As SFP are becoming more prevalent, food safety is increasingly considered a serious public health issue that affects all other safety aspects (Kadariya et al., 2014).The extensive use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including genetically distinguished methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains associated with communities and animals, such as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) and livestockassociated MRSA (LA-MRSA) (Fetsch et al., 2021).S. aureus strains exhibit antibiotic resistance due to specific genes that render them resistant to various antimicrobials, such as penicillins, tetracyclines, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones (Urban- Chmiel et al., 2022).The global increase in MDR is recognized as a public health threat (Algammal et al., 2022a).Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of MDR bacterial pathogens from various sources, emphasizing the importance of routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing to identify effective antibiotics and screen for emerging MDR strains (Algammal et al., 2020;Elmoslemany et al., 2021;Gordon et al., 2021;Algammal et al., 2022b).Despite sporadic reports of S. aureus toxins and drug resistance genes in Saudi retail foods, information on the prevalence, toxigenicity, and antibiotic resistance of S. aureus remains limited (Raji et al., 2016;Alghizzi and Shami, 2021;Alghizzi et al., 2021).Molecular genomic methods are essential tools for investigating the virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance, and toxin genes in S. aureus.aureus.In addition, it aids in elaborating the toxigenic and drug resistance potential of this microorganism in retail meats and hospitals.Meat and meat products have been found to be important S. aureus reservoirs and have been linked to various foodborne bacterial outbreaks (van Loo et al., 2007;Boost et al., 2013;Ge et al., 2017;Wu et al., 2018;Thwala et al., 2021).In Saudi Arabia, data on S. aureus.aureus in retail meat from different regions was limited (Abulreesh and Organji, 2011;Kay et al., 2013;El Sheikha, 2016;Raji et al., 2016;Shawish and Al-Humam, 2016;El-Ghareeb et al., 2019).Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the genomic relatedness and distribution of resistance and virulence genes among clinical and meat S. aureus isolates.The genomic investigation of S. aureus isolates from meat and their relationship with clinical S. aureus isolates may be an initial step in establishing an effective strategy in Saudi Arabia for monitoring the emergence and spread of S. aureus.

Sample collection
From October 2021 to June 2022, 84 non-duplicate isolates of S. aureus were obtained from inpatients at the bacteriology department of the Riyadh Regional Laboratory and Blood Bank.A wide range of specimens, including urine midstream, tissue culture, wound swab, nasal swab, pus swab, groin swab, axilla swab, burn swab, eye swab, bronchial wash, sputum, ascites (peritoneal) fluid, tracheal aspirate, and blood culture samples, were collected for analysis in this study.For additional details on the specimens, please refer to Supplementary Table 4 in Supplementary Material.Additionally, 250 raw meat samples, including camels, beef, chicken, fish, and lamb, were collected from various meat retailers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.All meat samples were transported in sealed plastic wrap or original packaging in insulated coolers maintained at a stable temperature of 4°C with adequate ice packs to sustain a stable temperature throughout the transportation process to the Reference Laboratory of Microbiology at the Saudi Food and Drug Authority.Microbiological analysis was conducted within 24 h of sampling.

Ethical approval
Ethical approval (approval number H-01-R-053) for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board committee of King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and the Institutional Biosafety and Bioethics Committee of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (approval number 22IBEC051).

Staphylococcus aureus isolation and identification
Meat samples were homogenized in a stomacher using a sterile plastic bag.This involved 25 g of each meat sample and 225 mL of buffered peptone water with 6.5% NaCl.Petrifilm ™ Staph Express count plate (3M ™ , St. Paul, MN, USA), a modified chromogenic Baird-Parker medium, was used as a selective and differential medium for S. aureus detection.The Petrifilm ™ Staph Express disk contained toluidine blue O and DNA.DNase-positive organisms degrade DNA that reacts with toluidine blue O to form pink zones.This allowed for a distinction between S. aureus colonies and other staphylococci.Single S. aureus colonies were transferred to mannitol salt agar (Neogen; Lansing, MI, USA).All S. aureus isolates were identified and confirmed using the classical method, which included Gram staining, catalase testing, and coagulase testing (PROLEX ™ , Neston, UK).All S. aureus isolates were further identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-offlight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) using the 70% formic acid protein extraction method.

Phenotypic and genotypic detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
The identification of MRSA strains was carried out using VITEK2 (bioMeŕieux, Craponne, France) and BD Phoenix (BD Diagnostics, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).The instruments' systems classify any S. aureus isolate as MRSA based on both oxacillin and cefoxitin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) breakpoints, interpreted according to Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).For oxacillin, isolates were considered resistant with MICs ≥4 mg/ml, whereas for cefoxitin, isolates were considered resistant with MICs ≥8 mg/ml.Individual colonies of the S. aureus isolates were transferred to Harlequin MRSA chromogenic agar for the selective and differential detection of MRSA (Neogen, Lansing, MI, USA).This medium allowed MRSA to grow because it includes a cefoxitin (Fox) supplement.The a-glucosidase enzyme produced by S. aureus cleaves the chromogenic substrate, resulting in blue colonies.
DNA was extracted from the bacterial culture using the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK), following the manufacturer's instructions.DNA purity was checked using a QIAxpert spectrophotometer (Qiagen, Manchester, UK), and DNA concentration was determined using a Qubit ™ Flex Fluorometer device (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The presence of methicillin resistance was determined by detecting the mecA gene, which encodes for penicillin's binding protein 2a (PBP2a).This was performed using a forward primer (5′-GTAGAAATGACTGAACGTCCGATAA-3′) and a reverse primer (5′-CCAATTCCACATTGTTTCCGTCTAA-3′), which amplified a 310 bp fragment (Parvin et al., 2021).The reaction was performed in 25 µL using DreamTaq ™ 2X Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).The reaction setup included 1 µL of each (10 pmol) primer and 2 µL of DNA template (20 ng/µL).S. aureus (ATCC43300) was used as a positive control (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, USA).The amplification process involved an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 45 s, 56°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min.This was followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 4 min.The final PCR product was analyzed on a 1.6% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and run for 60 min at 80 volts in 1X tris borate buffer (TBE) (BIOBasic, Markham, ON, Canada).Gel visualization was performed using the Image Lab ™ 6.1 Software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Whole-genome sequencing
Whole-genome sequencings (WGS) libraries were constructed using a QIAseq DNA FX library preparation kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK).The input concentration was 100 ng of DNA, following the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen, Manchester, UK).The library was size-selected to have a 300-350 bp insert size.Sequencing was performed using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with two SP flow cells (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).Data were quality-checked prior to analysis, with a Phred score cutoff of Q30.Bioinformatics analysis was conducted using the BactopiaV2 pipeline, focusing on the S. aureus-specific workflow (Petit and Read, 2020).Screening for pvl was carried out using local BLAST database identification of the two genes, lukS and lukF, accessions (YP_002268030.1 and YP_002268029.1),respectively.For sequence type (ST) assignment, the public MLST database for S. aureus was used.The clonal lineages of all S. aureus strains isolated from the patients and meat samples were identified using MLST.

Statistical analysis
To investigate the association between antibiotic resistance, toxins, and virulence genes in S. aureus isolates obtained from meat and patients, data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10.0 software (GraphPad Software, Boston, Massachusetts, USA).The two-tailed chi-square test (c2) was used to determine the significance of the differences, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.The correlation coefficient (r) was calculated among the demonstrated antimicrobial resistance genes in the S. aureus strains and different antimicrobial agents.The Pearson correlation coefficient in a correlation matrix was estimated using the "corrplot" package in R, (version 4.2.1)(Wei and Simko, 2021).

Staphylococcus aureus isolates
All S. aureus isolates recovered in this study were positive for several key phenotypic tests, such as Gram staining and catalase and coagulase tests.The isolates showed beta-hemolysis on blood agar, indicating the production of hemolysins and fermented mannitol on mannitol salt agar, leading to a color change from pink to yellow.Antibiotic susceptibility testing provided specific profiles for the sensitivity and resistance to various antibiotics.Using VITEK2, 56 S. aureus isolates from patients and 11 from meat were identified as MRSA, exhibiting positivity for cefoxitin and an oxacillin MIC ≥4 mg/L.The 42 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) isolates from meat were cefoxitin screen-negative, with oxacillin MICs measuring 0.5 mg/L.Additionally, BD Phoenix ™ identified 26 S. aureus isolates from patients as MRSA, all demonstrating cefoxitin MIC ≥8 mg/L and oxacillin MIC >2 mg/L.

Molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Multiple S. aureus clones were found in both patients and meat, with clonal complex CC5 being the most prevalent in both groups.CC5 comprised (38/80, 47.5%) clones from patients and (5/11, 45.45%) clones from meat.CC97 was the second most common clone in meat, making up (4/11, 36%) of the MRSA clones, while in patients it was only (6/80, 8%).CC361 was represented by (2/11, 18%) of the meat MRSA isolates and (5/80, 6%) of patients' MRSA isolates.The clonal lineages of all S. aureus strains isolated from the patients and meat samples were identified using MLST (Figure 2).Accessory gene regulator (agr) alleles were identified in 136 isolates by WGS.agr I was the most prevalent (58/136; 43%), followed by agr II (53/136; 39%) and agr III (22/136; 16%).Only one clinical S. aureus isolate harbored agr IV.The most common agr type of S. aureus isolated from meat was agr II, whereas agr I was the most common agr type isolated from the patients (Figure 2).
-, the isolates were negative for the tested antibiotics and the MAR index.The heat map illustrates the correlation coefficient (r) between the demonstrated antimicrobial resistance genes in the S. aureus strains and different antimicrobial agents.

FIGURE 2
Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes, enterotoxin genes, and virulence genes plotted against core genome phylogeny of S. aureus isolates based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).The agr, sequence types, and sources of the isolates were aligned with the tree.The fully colored circle indicates the presence of the target gene.White circles indicate the absence of investigated genes.

A B
(A) Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in S. aureus isolated from meat.(B).Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in S. aureus isolated from patients.
TABLE 2 The prevalence of resistance genes among S. aureus isolated from meat and patients.

Resistance gene
The protein encoded by the gene encompass mecA, aph(2'')-Ih, fusC, and tet38 which were identified in three meat samples associated with the MRSA Clonal Complex 97 (CC97).In the patients, they were present in MRSA isolates belonging to CC97, CC152, and CC153.In the context of virulence genes, the distribution patterns of genes exhibited nearly uniform prevalence across various clonal complexes.

Discussion
In this study, S. aureus isolates were found in 21.2% of retail meat samples.Similarly, several previous studies have reported comparable levels of S. aureus contamination in raw meat: 27.8% prevalence in the United States (Thapaliya et al., 2017), 24.5% in various African countries (Thwala et al., 2021), 23.8% in Iran (Safarpoor Dehkordi et al., 2017), 35% in China, 33.3% in the Netherlands (van Loo et al., 2007), and 22% in Bangladesh (Pu et al., 2009).Similarly, several earlier investigations have reported comparable levels of S. aureus contamination in raw meat: 27.8% prevalence in the United States (Thapaliya et al., 2017), 24.5% in various African countries (Thwala et al., 2021), 23.8% in Iran (Safarpoor Dehkordi et al., 2017), 35% in China, 33.3% in the Netherlands (van Loo et al., 2007), and 22% in Bangladesh (Pu et al., 2009).Various factors, such as hygiene practices, storage conditions, and the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry can differ between regions and impact the presence of S. aureus in meat (Dorjgochoo et al., 2023).These regional variations are essential for understanding and addressing the food safety concerns associated with S. aureus contamination.
In addition, 136 S. aureus isolates had diverse genetic backgrounds as demonstrated by MLST and agr typing.The most prevalent agr type in patient isolates in the present study was agr I.This finding aligns with previous reports indicating the predominance of agr I among MRSA isolates associated with  Distribution of enterotoxin genes in S. aureus isolated from meat and patients.et al., 2012;Senok et al., 2019).In contrast, the predominant agr type in meat in this study was agr II.A previous study reported the prevalence of agr types I, II, and III in S. aureus isolated from retail meat in Riyadh, all of which were evenly distributed across isolates (Raji et al., 2016).
Although agr IV has previously been identified in other clinical S. aureus isolates, only one clinical isolate in the present study harbored the same agr type (Monecke et al., 2012;Senok et al., 2019).The incompatibility of agr types over time indicates the flexibility of S. aureus isolates for adaptation.The clinical S. aureus isolates harboring agr IV in this study shared the same clonal lineage (CC121) as those from retail meat, carrying the same agr type, thereby demonstrating genetic relatedness (Raji et al., 2016).
The high prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in both patient and meat isolates is concerning because it underscores the potential for the transmission of resistance traits from the food supply to the clinical setting.tet38, which encodes tetracycline resistance, was found in 100% and 69% of patients and meat isolates, respectively.A previous study reported a tetK prevalence of 4% among S. aureus isolates from retail meat (Raji et al., 2016).Additionally, in a hospital in Riyadh, S. aureus isolates had tetK and tetM prevalence rates of 10.2% and 20.5%, respectively (Monecke et al., 2012).The increase in the prevalence of tet gene may indicate the excessive use of tetracyclines over the past few years.Moreover, b -lactam resistance genes, including blaZ, were highly prevalent in 70% and 62% of meat and patients, respectively.Comparatively, these rates slightly decreased compared to previous studies in Saudi Arabia, where isolates from retail meat in Riyadh had a blaZ prevalence rate of 88% (Raji et al., 2016) and those from hospitals in Riyadh were 93.46% (Monecke et al., 2012).Furthermore, the gene encoding phosphonic acid resistance, fosB, had prevalence rates of 70% and 58% in the patient and meat isolates in the present study, respectively.This is consistent with a previous study on retail meat, wherein 52% of S. aureus isolates harbored fosB (Raji et al., 2016).
The high prevalence of some antibiotic genes in this study, such as fosB, in MRSA isolates raises concerns regarding the potential compromise of fosfomycin as a last-resort therapy for staphylococcal infections.Fosfomycin is used to treat MRSA and MDR infections because it can penetrate biofilms and exert intracellular bactericidal activity because of its low molecular weight (Chen et al., 2022).Fosfomycin is often used in combination with other antibiotics to reach targets more efficiently, thereby improving the therapeutic effects of the combined antibiotics (Chen et al., 2022).The high prevalence of fosB gene, highlights the risk of emerging resistance, which affects the efficacy of fosfomycin in the treatment MRSA infections.In the present study, the MAR index values (0.2-0.5) of most MDR S. aureus strains revealed multiple resistance patterns, suggesting that the S. aureus strains were derived from high-risk contamination (Krumperman, 1983).This result emphasizes the potential public health implications of antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus isolates.
Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins are gastrointestinal exotoxins that can cause SFP when consumed in certain amounts (Argudıń et al., 2010).Staphylococcal enterotoxin A (sea) is the most frequently identified cause of SFP, and classic enterotoxins (sea, seb, sec, sed, and see) are associated with the most reported food poisoning outbreaks (Cha et al., 2006).In Kuwait, a study of 200 isolates obtained from food handlers in various restaurants with suspected SFP revealed that the majority of isolates were resistant to various antibacterial agents, and that 71% of the isolates harbored genes for SEs, with sei being the most prevalent (Udo et al., 2009).In the present study, the enterotoxin-like gene selX was found in 95% of the patient isolates, followed by the sem and sei genes, and sen.Meat isolates exhibited comparable prevalence rates.These rates differ depending on the source of isolation and area.For instance, in Riyadh, a previous study isolated S. aureus from dairy products and identified 14 enterotoxin genes, of which seh had the highest ratio (51%).Furthermore, classic enterotoxins have a lower prevalence, except for the see gene (27.5%)(Alghizzi and Shami, 2021).In another study, the prevalence of seh gene in S. aureus isolates from processed meat was the highest at 49% (Alghizzi et al., 2021).In 2014, 165 S. aureus isolates were obtained from food handlers in Makkah, and PCR analysis of classic SEs genes revealed that sea was the most prevalent enterotoxin in MRSA (36%) and MSSA (30%) isolates (Ahmed and Mashat, 2014).Similarly, the most prevalent classic enterotoxin in S. aureus isolates in the present study was sea.The prevalence of classic SEs genes in MRSA isolates from patients in Riyadh in 2012 was < 9% (Monecke et al., 2012).In the early 2000s, 129 S. aureus isolates were identified from food handlers in Makkah during the Hajj season, and sec and sea were observed in 15.5% and 12.4% of the S. aureus isolates, respectively (Dablool and Al-Ghamdi, 2011).In the present study, sec was detected in 10% of the S. aureus isolates, and the prevalence of the sea gene was 32%.The high compatibility of enterotoxin genotypes in S. aureus isolates from meat and patients indicates a strong genomic association between the isolates from both sources.Furthermore, the higher prevalence of enterotoxin genes in the patient isolates suggests their role in the clinical manifestations of S. aureus infections, potentially leading to more severe symptoms.Every toxin-encoding gene is equally important; the more genes an organism possesses, the more virulent it becomes (Tam and Torres, 2019).In Saudi Arabia, information regarding the prevalence and molecular characteristics of these virulence genes is limited.However, our analysis revealed a consistent distribution pattern of virulence genes across S. aureus isolates from meat samples and patients, indicating a common genetic structure among pathogens from both sources.Notably, key virulence genes, including cap, hly/hla, sbi, geh, hlgA/hlgB, esaA/esaB, essA/ essB, esxA, ica, lip, hld, adsA, sspB/sspC, isdE/isdF/isdG, and srtB were present in all S. aureus isolates.This consistency suggests that these genes play essential roles in the pathogenesis of S. aureus from various sources.Although a significant difference in the distribution of virulence genes was observed between S. aureus isolates from meat samples and patients (p < 0.0001), it is essential to note the different sample sizes in each group.Nevertheless, this significance underscores the robust association between virulence gene distribution and the source of S. aureus isolates.
S. aureus produces the cytotoxin PVL, which destroys leukocytes and results in tissue necrosis (Otto, 2014).Previously, pvl gene was not abundant, except in some cases, and was often associated with CA-MRSA strains (Alghizzi and Shami, 2021;Alghizzi et al., 2021).For example, this gene was not detected in 50 S. aureus isolates obtained from patients in Makkah in 2017 (Abulreesh et al., 2017).In addition, it is absent in S. aureus isolated from dairy products, milk, and processed foods in Riyadh (Alghizzi and Shami, 2021;Alghizzi et al., 2021).In this study, 28% of S. aureus isolates from patients harbored pvl, and only one S. aureus isolate from beef that belonged to LA-MRSA CC361 harbored this gene.A previous study of 125 MRSA isolates linked to clinical infections in Riyadh reported a pvl prevalence of 30% (Senok et al., 2019).The high prevalence of pvl-carrying S. aureus clones in hospitals, which is known for its association with CA-MRSA, suggests that CA-MRSA isolates outnumber HA-MRSA in hospitals and that there is an over-time shift in the distribution of MRSA types.
Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) exotoxin is a superantigen that is generally resistant to heat and proteolysis and induces T celldependent shock syndrome with significant mortality by boosting the excessive release of cytokines (Dinges et al., 2000).Although S. aureus isolated from meat had a slightly higher prevalence of the tst gene in this study, it did not vary greatly from that of S. aureus isolated from patients.These numbers are slightly lower than the national tst gene prevalence rates, which range from 11.2% to 13.2% in human infections (Alkharsah et al., 2018;Senok et al., 2019).Evaluation of the frequency of virulence genes in S. aureus strains serves as a fundamental basis for formulating effective infection control strategies and anti-virulence interventions to suppress S. aureus with hypervirulent genes (Dinges et al., 2000).A limitation of this study was the small sample size, which was determined by the city's landscape within a confined geographical area.Moreover, this study was constrained by the comparison of MRSA isolates from symptomatic humans with S. aureus and MRSA isolated from meat products.It is important to note, however, that our findings align with previous research conducted in this region (Raji et al., 2016;Aljeldah, 2020;Alghizzi et al., 2021).
The observed correlation in genetic lineages, antibiotic resistance profiles, enterotoxin genes, and virulence genes between the two sources of S. aureus has significant implications for public health.Further research is recommended to explore the genetic factors involved in S. aureus pathogenicity and their potential impact on clinical outcomes and food safety.Additionally, protocols to monitor and limit the transmission of S. aureus between clinical and foodborne settings should be developed to mitigate the potential risks to public health.

Conclusion
Our findings provide a comprehensive exploration of the genomic properties of the clinical and foodborne S. aureus strains.The results strongly support the close genetic association between S. aureus isolates from meat and patients, revealing shared antibiotic resistance and virulence gene profiles.Notably, the detection of a diverse array of these genes in meat-derived S. aureus, which is highly compatible with that found in patient isolates, underscores the significant genomic relatedness observed in our study.The high prevalence of specific genes such as selX, tet38, blaZ, fosB, and mecA, highlights potential challenges associated with virulence and antibiotic resistance.Our study indicates that the misuse of antibiotics may contribute to the dissemination of multidrug resistance across S. aureus isolates from different settings, with meat serving as a potential reservoir for MDR dissemination.In light of these findings, a comprehensive approach is essential for estimating the prevalence, prevent, and control S. aureus infections, thereby improving both animal and human health.legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

TABLE 1 The
Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistance Profiles and the Resistance Genes Among the isolated S. aureus (n=136).

TABLE 2 Continued
N, total number of S. aureusS.aureus isolates in this study; n, number of S. aureusS.aureus isolates positive for a gene profile; -, no isolates positive for a gene.The numbers in parentheses indicate percentages.

TABLE 3
Enterotoxin gene patterns of Staphylococcus aureus.

TABLE 4 Continued
, total number of isolates from the type of sample; N, total number of S. aureus isolates; -, no isolates positive for this virulence gene the n, number of total isolates from the type of sample; N, total number of S. aureus isolates; -, no isolates positive for this virulence gene. n