Chatbots for embarrassing and stigmatizing conditions: could chatbots encourage users to seek medical advice?

Background: Chatbots are increasingly being used across a wide range of contexts. Medical chatbots have the potential to improve healthcare capacity and provide timely patient access to health information. Chatbots may also be useful for encouraging individuals to seek an initial consultation for embarrassing or stigmatizing conditions. Method: This experimental study used a series of vignettes to test the impact of different scenarios (experiencing embarrassing vs. stigmatizing conditions, and sexual vs. non-sexual symptoms) on consultation preferences (chatbot vs. doctor), attitudes toward consultation methods, and expected speed of seeking medical advice. Results: The ﬁndings show that the majority of participants preferred doctors over chatbots for consultations across all conditions and symptom types. However, more participants preferred chatbots when addressing embarrassing sexual symptoms, compared with other symptom categories. Consulting with a doctor was believed to be more accurate, reassuring, trustworthy, useful and conﬁdential than consulting with a medical chatbot, but also more embarrassing and stressful. Consulting with a medical chatbot was believed to be easier and more convenient, but also more frustrating. Interestingly, people with an overall preference for chatbots believed this method would encourage them to seek medical advice earlier than those who would prefer to consult with a doctor. Conclusions: The ﬁndings highlight the potential role of chatbots in addressing embarrassing sexual symptoms. Incorporating chatbots into healthcare systems could provide a faster, more accessible and convenient route to health information and early diagnosis, as individuals may use them to seek earlier consultations.


Introduction
A chatbot is a "communication simulating computer program" designed to mimic human-to-human conversation by analyzing the user's text-based input, and providing smart, related answers (Dahiya, 2017;Khan et al., 2018).Chatbots are often designed for a specific environment or context, e.g., answering online customers' frequently asked questions, or providing technical support.Chatbots are increasingly being used within healthcare as a way of dealing with growing demands for health information (Rosruen and Samanchuen, 2018;Softić et al., 2021).Medical chatbots can use the information provided by the user regarding their health concerns and/or symptoms and provide advice on the best course of action for treatment or further investigation.Medical chatbots offer two key potential benefits for assisting healthcare: (1) supporting a strained healthcare workforce by increasing system capacity, and (2) encouraging individuals to seek early support for embarrassing and stigmatizing conditions.
Healthcare services are notoriously overworked and understaffed (Bridgeman et al., 2018;Baker et al., 2020).Though this has been especially apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is a longstanding problem that is expected to persist in the future (House of Commons Health Social Care Committee.,2021).In the UK, many patients experience considerable wait times for doctor appointments (McIntyre and Chow, 2020;Oliver, 2022;Appleby, 2023).Therefore, there is a significant need for interventions to help increase health service capacity in a timely and cost-effective manner, without placing further burden on healthcare staff.Every day, people around the world search the internet for health information.It is estimated that Google receives more than 1 billion health questions every day (Drees, 2019).However, it can be difficult for users to know which online sources provide safe and reliable health information (Daraz et al., 2019;Battineni et al., 2020).NHS England has stated that achieving a core level of digital maturity across integrated care systems is a key priority within its 2022/3 operational planning guidance (NHS England, 2022).In the week of the NHS' 75th birthday, a summit was held with the aim of driving digital innovation to help deliver better care for patients and cut waiting times (Department of Health Social Care, 2023).Recent examples of digital innovation in healthcare have included medical chatbots, which provide an opportunity to free up staff time, whilst providing patients with timely and efficient access to trustworthy health information (Gilbert et al., 2023;Lee et al., 2023;Matulis and McCoy, 2023).
Medical chatbots may play another important role in health and wellbeing.There are many conditions which go underdiagnosed and untreated due to individuals feeling stigmatized and/or embarrassed (Sheehan and Corrigan, 2020).It can be difficult for individuals to share information and openly discuss their health with medical professionals when they anticipate stigma or embarrassment in response to disclosing their symptoms (Simpson et al., 2021;Brown et al., 2022a,b).Many people may miss the opportunity for early treatment, which can lead to significant decreases in health and wellbeing.Medical chatbots could provide users with a more accessible initial consultation to discuss health concerns and/or medical symptoms (Bates, 2019).Medical chatbots could be used to encourage users to talk about their symptoms in a relaxed environment, which may act as a positive "first step" to help them on their health journey.Conducting some of the initial awkward discussions about embarrassing and/or stigmatizing symptoms through a medical chatbot could make the difference between someone seeking medical advice or choosing to ignore the issue (or delaying help seeking).Chatbots can also be useful after an initial diagnosis, and can be used to help individuals manage their long-term health (Bates, 2019).It is predicted that in the future, patients will have the ability to share their healthcare records and information with medical chatbots, to help further improve their application and accuracy (Bates, 2019).
Interest in chatbots has further increased with the recent release of ChatGPT.In August 2023, we asked ChatGPT version 3.5 to describe itself, it responded, "ChatGPT is an AI language model developed by OpenAI that can engage in conversations and generate human-like text that is based on the input it receives.It is trained on a large dataset from the Internet and uses deep learning to understand and respond to user queries" (OpenAI., 2023).Originally released in November 2022, healthcare researchers have already begun to explore the potential of ChatGPT and similar tools for improving healthcare.A US online survey of 600 active ChatGPT users found that approximately 7% of respondents were already using it for health-related queries (Choudhury and Shamszare, 2023).Another US-representative survey of over 400 users suggested that laypeople appear to trust the use of chatbots for answering low-risk health questions (Nov et al., 2023).Initial findings suggest that ChatGPT can produce highly relevant and interpretable responses to medical questions about diagnosis and treatment (Hopkins et al., 2023).Despite the potential to assist in providing medical advice and timely diagnosis, concerns have been raised about the accuracy of responses and the continuing need for human oversight (Temsah et al., 2023).It is vital that researchers continue to investigate health-related interactions between chatbots and users to both limit the risk of harm and maximize the potential improvements to healthcare.
In this study, we are interested in exploring preferences for initial consultations about different medical symptoms.We are particularly interested in the impact of potentially embarrassing or stigmatizing symptoms on patient preferences for consultations with doctors and chatbots.Therefore, the aims of this study are threefold: (1) to investigate preferred consultation methods in response to experiencing potentially embarrassing or stigmatizing medical symptoms; (2) to assess participant beliefs about the benefits/limitations of different consultation methods for potentially embarrassing or stigmatizing medical symptoms; and (3) to examine whether a particular consultation method is more likely to result in seeking earlier consultation.

Methods
An experimental study was conducted using a quantitative Qualtrics questionnaire that was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at Northumbria University (ethical approval 54282).A UK nationally representative sample of 402 adult participants was recruited via the platform Prolific.To provide nationally representative samples, Prolific screens participants based on age, gender, and ethnicity in proportion to data derived from the UK's national census in 2021 (Office for National Statistics., 2023;Prolific., 2023).Participants were UK residents aged between 18 and 81 years (M = 46.23 years, SD = 15.95 years), 203 were female, 195 were male and four reported a different gender identity.For full details of the sample characteristics, see Table 1.

Categorizing symptoms as embarrassing/stigmatizing and sexual/non-sexual
Participants were asked to imagine they were experiencing a particular set of medical symptoms and then answered questions about their expected response.The health conditions associated with the presented symptoms were categorized into potentially embarrassing or potentially stigmatizing conditions.They were also classified as sexual or non-sexual symptoms.These categories of health conditions and related symptoms were drawn from existing health literature that identified conditions as either potentially embarrassing or stigmatizing and/or sexual or nonsexual (see below).Feelings of embarrassment when discussing health are common among patients living with a range of conditions and symptoms, including: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) (Duffy, 2020), Psoriasis (Taliercio et al., 2021;Sumpton et al., 2022), low libido (Brandon, 2016), and those experiencing pain during sex (McDonagh et al., 2018;Lee and Frodsham, 2019).These conditions involve symptoms that people may find uncomfortable, awkward, or challenging to discuss openly.These symptoms are often considered personal or intimate aspects of someone's life that may be embarrassing to disclose to others.In contrast, conditions typically associated with experiences of health-related stigma include: Diabetes (Schabert et al., 2013;Liu et al., 2017), Eating Disorders (EDs) (Dimitropoulos et al., 2016;Williams et al., 2018), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (Earnshaw and Chaudoir, 2009;Nyblade et al., 2009), and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) (Hood and Friedman, 2011; Lee and Cody, 2020).These conditions are often linked to experiences of societal stigmatization, public misconceptions, and discriminatory attitudes.People experiencing potentially stigmatizing symptoms may face significant challenges, including social exclusion, prejudice, and fear of judgment.We also distinguish between sexual symptoms (low libido, pain during sex, HIV and STIs) and non-sexual symptoms (IBS, Psoriasis, eating disorders and Diabetes).This is an important distinction because previous research has found that patients are often less likely to discuss sexual health issues with medical professionals compared to non-sexual symptoms (Martel et al., 2017;Manninen et al., 2021).The full research team drew on their collective experience in health stigma research to discuss and agree the final selection of symptoms and conditions, and to assign their respective categories.By asking participants to consider experiences of embarrassing and stigmatizing symptoms that are either sexual or non-sexual in nature, we aim to gain insights into the factors that influence medical consultation preferences for each category.

Study materials
The study protocol is set out in Figure 1.Firstly, participants provided demographic information (age, gender, ethnicity, country of residence, and educational attainment).Participants then indicated whether they had experience working in healthcare or using chatbots ("yes/no"), and how familiar they were with chatbots, texting, and video calls on a four-point Likert scale from "not at all familiar" to "extremely familiar." Each participant was then provided with 2 scenarios: 1 from the embarrassing condition group, and then 1 from the stigmatizing condition group.In each scenario, participants were evenly allocated to either the sexual or non-sexual symptom groups, and then randomly presented with a specific set of symptoms.
Participants were asked to answer ten questions for each scenario.See Figure 1 for precise categorization and wording of symptoms.
For each scenario, participants were asked how quickly they would seek medical advice about the presented symptoms on a four-point Likert scale from "no hurry to seek advice" to "would seek advice immediately" and how embarrassing they believed it would be to seek medical advice about the presented symptoms on a fourpoint Likert scale from "not at all" to "extremely embarrassing." Participants were also asked to compare doctors and medical chatbots across ten dimensions to determine which would be more: convenient, useful, easy, confidential, stressful, trustworthy, frustrating, reassuring, embarrassing, and accurate.Responses were provided on a five-point continuum from "Chatbot would be a lot more. . ." to "Doctor would be a lot more...".Participants also ranked their preferred way to interact with a doctor if experiencing the presented symptoms ("in-person, " "phone call, " "video call, " or "text messaging") and their preferred method for interacting with a medical chatbot ("phone call", "video call", or "text messaging").
Finally, participants were asked to state their overall preferred method of consultation for the symptoms described in each scenario: "Doctor" or "Chatbot."Participants were then asked the extent to which their preferred method of initial consultation would be: positive for their life, personally beneficial, beneficial for society, something they intend to use, something they will try, and something others should use.Participants responded on a five-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree."Participants were asked if their preferred method of initial consultation would encourage them to seek medical advice earlier/later, on a five-point Likert scale from "much earlier" to "much later."Finally, participants indicated whether they had previously experienced the symptoms described ("yes/no").
We investigated the separate effects of embarrassing vs. stigmatizing conditions and sexual vs. non-sexual symptoms on preferred method of initial consultation.All participants were presented with symptoms associated with both embarrassing (scenario one) and stigmatizing conditions (scenario two).However, participants were randomly assigned sexual or nonsexual symptoms for each scenario, therefore some participants were presented with one sexual and one non-sexual set of symptoms (n = 200), whereas others saw two of the same type (n = 202).Therefore, we conducted different statistical analyses to study the effects of embarrassing vs. stigmatizing conditions, compared to sexual vs. non-sexual symptoms.
Two separate chi-square tests were conducted for scenarios one and two (embarrassing and stigmatizing conditions respectively; n = 402) to determine the effect of sexual vs. non-sexual symptoms on preferred method of initial consultation (chatbot vs. doctor).
McNemar's chi-square test was used to determine the effect of embarrassing vs. stigmatizing conditions on preferred method of initial consultation, among those participants that were randomly assigned the same symptom type in both scenarios (i.e., two sexual sets of symptoms, or two non-sexual sets of symptoms; n = 202).This approach enabled us to investigate the effect of embarrassing vs. stigmatizing on preferred method of consultation, whilst controlling for the effect of considering sexual vs. nonsexual symptoms.To evaluate overall consultation preference across scenarios, a new variable was created capturing whether participants chose "Doctor" or "Chatbot" for both scenarios or "Both" (indicating a different preference in each scenario).Multinomial regression was used to determine the impact of age and gender on overall consultation preference (n = 402).
In relation to the survey items where we asked participants to compare doctors and chatbots across 10 dimensions, we combined scores for the positive dimensions (convenient, useful, easy, confidential, trustworthy, reassuring, and accurate) and negative dimensions (stressful, frustrating, and embarrassing) to create two subscales (positive and negative consultation attributes).For each subscale, the scores were summed to produce a single value.Cronbach's Alpha was calculated for each subscale.For the positive attributes subscale α = 0.79 indicating a "high" standard of internal consistency between items (Taber, 2018).The value for Cronbach's Alpha for the negative subscale was α = 0.63 indicating an "adequate" degree of internal consistency between items (Taber, 2018).Independent sample t-tests were conducted to compare positive and negative attributes between those participants presented with sexual vs. non-sexual symptoms.To investigate the effect of embarrassing vs. stigmatizing conditions, paired-sample t-tests were used to compare dimensions between scenarios among those assigned the same symptom type (sexual or non-sexual) in both scenarios.
Finally, separate Welch t-tests for each scenario investigated differences between participants' beliefs about whether their preferred method of initial consultation would influence their expected speed of seeking medical advice, between participants preferring chatbots vs. those preferring doctors.

Results
A summary of sample demographics and characteristics is provided in Table 1.

Preferred method for initial medical consultation between stigmatizing and embarrassing health conditions
Across all 8 health conditions, the majority of participants preferred an initial consultation with a doctor rather than a chatbot (Figure 2).
The majority (65.7%) of participants expressed the same preference for a doctor across both the stigmatizing and embarrassing scenarios.Almost 12% of participants preferred a chatbot across both scenarios, but 22.4% expressed a different preference for the stigmatizing and embarrassing scenarios.From these participants with different preferences across scenarios (n = 90), 57.8% (n = 52) chose chatbots for the embarrassing scenario and doctors for the stigmatizing scenario, and 42.2% (n = 38) chose doctors for the embarrassing scenario and chatbots for the stigmatizing scenario.
We compared the effect of scenario (embarrassing vs. stigmatizing conditions) on consultation choice among those participants that responded to the same symptom type (sexual or non-sexual) in both scenarios.A McNemar's chi-square test determined that there was no significant difference in overall consultation choice between embarrassing and stigmatizing conditions [x 2 (1, 202) = 2.38, p = 0.12; see Supplementary Figure S3].
When ranking methods for interacting with a doctor, 67.8% of responses chose "in-person" as their preferred choice.This finding was consistent across all symptoms.Interacting with a doctor via text was least preferred, ranked last in 60% of all responses.For chatbots, interacting via text was the preferred method (ranked first in 72% of all responses) and video was the least preferred (ranked last in 59.5% of responses; see Figure 3).

Preferred method for initial medical consultation between sexual and non-sexual symptoms
We also investigated whether preference for an initial consultation with a doctor or chatbot differed between sexual and non-sexual symptoms.When comparing within the  embarrassing (compared to stigmatizing) conditions, a chisquare test of independence indicated a significant difference in consultation choice between those presented with sexual vs. non-sexual symptoms [x 2 (1, 402) = 28.17,p < 0.001; see Supplementary Figure S1].Though doctors were the preferred choice overall, more participants preferred chatbots among those considering embarrassing sexual symptoms than for embarrassing non-sexual symptoms.However, there was no significant difference in consultation choice between sexual and non-sexual symptoms in scenario two (potentially stigmatizing symptoms; x 2 (1, 402) = 3.79, p = 0.05; see Supplementary Figure S2).

Participant beliefs about doctor vs. chatbot consultation methods
Overall, participants reported believing that an initial consultation with a doctor would be more accurate, reassuring, trustworthy, useful and confidential than consulting with a medical chatbot, but also more embarrassing and stressful.An initial consultation with a medical chatbot was believed to be easier, more convenient but also more frustrating than consulting with a doctor (see Figure 4).T-tests were conducted for each scenario to investigate differences in overall scores for positive attributes (accurate, reassuring, trustworthy, useful, confidential, easy, convenient) and negative attributes (embarrassing, stressful, frustrating).A difference was found when comparing between Participants who preferred an initial consultation with a doctor reported greater belief in the personal benefits of their chosen method compared to those preferring chatbots (see Figure 5).There was no significant difference in the perceived societal benefits of their chosen method between those preferring doctors/chatbots.

Influence of preferred method of consultation on expected speed of seeking medical advice
We compared participant beliefs about whether their preferred method of initial consultation would influence their expected speed of seeking medical advice.Welch t-tests (conducted to account for unequal groups sizes between those preferring chatbots vs. doctors) found that participants with an overall preference for chatbots indicated that this method would encourage them to seek earlier medical advice than those preferring an initial consultation with a doctor (see Figure 6).A significant difference in expected speed of seeking medical advice between consultation choice groups (chatbot vs. doctor) was found in both scenario one (potentially embarrassing symptoms; t(228) = 14.58, p < 0.001) and scenario two [stigmatizing conditions; t(146.38)= 6.51, p < 0.001].

Discussion
While our results found that the majority of people would prefer to receive an initial consultation from a doctor than from a medical chatbot for all health conditions depicted in this study, more participants preferred chatbots when considering embarrassing symptoms that were also sexual (e.g., low libido, pain during sex).However, doctors were still the more frequent choice for this category.Previous studies into interaction preferences with respect to potentially embarrassing sexual conditions has produced mixed findings.For example, a study of over 300 university students in Canada and South Africa found that men and women would prefer to receive STI test results by talking face-to-face with a doctor rather than via phone, text message, e-mail, or other forms of Internet-based communication (Labacher and Mitchell, 2013).Similarly, an online survey of 148 German adults reported that patients would prefer to disclose medical information to a doctor rather than to a chatbot, and found no difference in the tendency to conceal information from either doctors or chatbots (Frick et al., 2021).However, Holthöwer and van Doorn (2022) recently found that, despite being typically reluctant to interact with service robots, consumers perceive them less negatively when engaging in an embarrassing service encounter (such as acquiring medication to treat a sexually transmitted disease).Similarly, in a study of 179 online participants, Kim et al. (2022) found that people are less willing to interact with a doctor than with a medical chatbot, when answering potentially embarrassing questions (recent sexual activity, habits, and preferences).Whereas, for non-sensitive questions (demographic questions and current state of health), willingness to disclose was higher in the human condition than in the chatbot condition.Participants of a recent online survey in the UK reported neutral-to-positive attitudes toward sexual health chatbots, and were broadly comfortable disclosing sensitive information with further qualitative findings suggesting that chatbots provide a useful means of providing sexual health information (Nadarzynski et al., 2021(Nadarzynski et al., , 2023)).In our present study, participant evaluations of each consultation method revealed that people were generally most positive about the qualities of chatbots when considering embarrassing and sexual symptoms.Those considering sexual symptoms associated negative dimensions more with doctors, whereas those considering non-sexual symptoms attributed negative dimensions more to chatbots.In light of the collective evidence from this study and previous research, medical chatbots may encourage users to seek medical advice relating to potentially embarrassing sexual symptoms, despite the persisting overall preference for human doctor consultations.Furthermore, some participants did indicate a preference for medical chatbots in both presented scenarios.This suggests that providing the option to receive an initial consultation from a medical chatbot would be beneficial to those who are already comfortable with this emerging technology.
Some previous research has suggested that high levels of technology acceptance support the ongoing use of telehealth solutions in healthcare beyond the constraints of the pandemic (Burbury et al., 2022;Desborough et al., 2022;Branley-Bell and Murphy-Morgan, 2023).However, our findings suggest more people still prefer in-person interactions with doctors.Similarly, an online survey of over a thousand Australian patients found that most (62.6%)preferred in-person consultations with their doctor compared to remote consultations, however those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer inperson consultations (Rasmussen et al., 2022).Our study did not ask participants to consider the time, cost or logistics involved in accessing an in-person consultation with their doctor.It is possible that considering the practical factors (as well as the social and emotional factors this study investigated) associated with attending an in-person appointment with a doctor may impact real-world decision-making with respect to medical consultations.
For consultations with doctors, participants reported preferring in-person interactions and least preferred interacting via text.Whereas, for consulting with a chatbot, participants reported preferring to interact via text and least preferred video, avatar-based interactions.This is interesting given the increase in avatar-based chatbots as a method to increase their uptake and acceptance in healthcare settings (Ciechanowski et al., 2019;Moriuchi, 2022).There are multiple potential explanations for this finding, including privacy and ease of use-it may simply be easier and feel more confidential for users to interact with a chatbot via text, whereas they may need to find a private space to engage in a 'conversation' with an avatar-based chatbot.Familiarity will also play a role as users will tend to prefer technology they are more familiar with (e.g., chatbot text based interaction compared to speech based avatar interaction).Communicating by text may also avoid the feeling of another being physically present, which makes sense when we find that users are most likely to use chatbots for embarrassing, sexual symptoms-in this particular situation perhaps being more human-like is a disadvantage for chatbots.Previous research in a consumer setting found that people perceive an increased social presence when a chatbot is more "human-like, " making consumers more likely to feel socially judged (Holthöwer and van Doorn, 2022).Furthermore, research suggests that users may show a preference for text chatbots over video-based chatbots due to the "uncanny valley" effect.This relates to a feeling of unease when interacting with something that seems eerily human (Ciechanowski et al., 2019).
The attribute which differed the most between symptom categories was perceived stressfulness.When considering embarrassing sexual symptoms (pain during sex and low libido), participants reported that consulting with a doctor would be significantly more stressful than with a chatbot.These findings indicate the potential for medical chatbots to alleviate some of the emotional barriers and enhance patient wellbeing in areas traditionally associated with discomfort and anxiety.Furthermore, we found that participants with an overall preference for chatbots believed that this method would encourage them to seek medical advice earlier than those who preferred an initial consultation with a doctor.This was true across all symptom categories.This is particularly relevant for individuals dealing with embarrassing or stigmatizing symptoms, as they may be more likely to avoid discussing their health with others, thereby risking aggravating their symptoms and the possibility of missing out on earlier, more manageable treatment options.Embracing the use of medical chatbots for timely advice and treatment could help to alleviate the current strain on the healthcare system: firstly, by relieving some of the burden of initial consultations and empowering individuals to address their symptoms promptly; and secondly, by tackling the development of more severe conditions resulting from prolonged undiagnosed or untreated symptoms.
Given recent developments in large language models and the increasing capabilities of AI, perceptions toward medical chatbots are likely to change and evolve in the years to come.For example, a recent study asked a team of licensed healthcare professionals to compare doctor and ChatGPT responses to health questions on social media (Ayers et al., 2023).ChatGPT responses were rated significantly higher, in terms of both quality and empathy, than those made by doctors for 78.6% of the 585 evaluations.A recent systematic review of research into the potential healthcare applications of ChatGPT and related tools suggested that they have the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery (Muftić et al., 2023).Although at present, individuals may experience some concerns or unease with the use of AI, this is not uncommon for new technology (Meuter et al., 2003;Szollosy, 2017;Khasawneh, 2018), as society becomes more familiar with the technology, and awareness of potential benefits and usefulness increases, we may see a shift in preferences and/or a wider uptake of chatbot services.Amidst the wide array of potential benefits and challenges associated with medical chatbots, our findings suggest they could be useful for encouraging patients to seek earlier medical advice, with particular relevance for people experiencing potentially embarrassing sexual symptoms.

Limitations
We acknowledge the limitations of our study.Firstly, the study focused on hypothetical scenarios and participants' expected preferences, which may not fully reflect their actual choices and behaviors in real-life health situations.Future research should look to assess participant responses to actual interactions with medical chatbots, as well as investigating real-life choices around available consultation methods.It is also important to note that the study did not ask participants to consider practical factors that may influence their decision to choose a particular consultation method or the strength of their preference.Though people may ideally prefer to receive a medical consultation from a doctor, practical factors (such as having to take time off work, cost of traveling to an appointment, caregiving commitments, as well as current state of physical and mental health) may influence the decision to choose a particular method of medical consultation.

Conclusion
Despite the increasing role of technology in healthcare, this study found that more people still prefer consultations with doctors over chatbots.However, when it comes to potentially embarrassing sexual symptoms, chatbots were more accepted and preferred by more participants than when considering other symptom categories.Participants evaluated chatbots more positively when considering potentially embarrassing sexual symptoms, while their evaluations of doctors for the same symptoms were more negative.These findings suggest that chatbots have the potential to encourage individuals to seek earlier medical advice, particularly for symptoms they may find uncomfortable to discuss with their doctor.Incorporating chatbot interventions in healthcare settings-as a compliment, not replacement, to face-to-face consultations could serve as a valuable tool in the patient experience and encourage more timely healthcare seeking behaviors.The chatbot can serve as a first point of call to collect data, particularly relating to embarrassing symptoms.However, it is important to ./fcomm. .
acknowledge that further research is needed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical chatbots in real-world health settings.

FIGURE
FIGUREInitial consultation preference across health conditions.

FIGURE
FIGUREParticipant evaluations of consultation method across multiple dimensions.

FIGURE
FIGUREParticipant beliefs about their preferred method of consultation.

FIGURE
FIGUREParticipant beliefs about whether their chosen method of consultation would influence speed of seeking medical advice.Colored bars indicate the mean scores from our full (n =) for expected speed of seeking medical advice for those who preferred a Chatbot (in pink) for each symptom category, and for those who preferred a Doctor (in blue) for each symptom category.