@ARTICLE{10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689, AUTHOR={Guzzetti, Ezequiel and Annabi, Mohamed-Salah and Pibarot, Philippe and Clavel, Marie-Annick}, TITLE={Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium}, JOURNAL={Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine}, VOLUME={7}, YEAR={2020}, URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689}, DOI={10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689}, ISSN={2297-055X}, ABSTRACT={Aortic stenosis (AS) is a disease of the valve and the myocardium. A correct assessment of the valve disease severity is key to define the need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), but a better understanding of the myocardial consequences of the increased afterload is paramount to optimize the timing of the intervention. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the cornerstone of AS assessment, as it is universally available, and it allows a comprehensive structural and hemodynamic evaluation of both the aortic valve and the rest of the heart. However, it may not be sufficient as a significant proportion of patients with severe AS presents with discordant grading (i.e., an AVA ≤ 1 cm2 and a mean gradient <40 mmHg) which raises uncertainty about the true severity of AS and the need for AVR. Several imaging modalities (transesophageal or stress echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography) exist that allow a detailed assessment of the stenotic aortic valve and the myocardial remodeling response. This review aims to provide an updated overview of these multimodality imaging techniques and seeks to highlight a practical approach to help clinical decision making in the challenging group of patients with discordant low-gradient AS.} }