Epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia with or without high lipoprotein(a) levels

Background and aims Epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease might be different in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia plus high levels (≥30 mg/dl) of Lp(a) (H-Lpa) than in those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone (H-LDL). We compared the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in patients with H-Lpa and in those with H-LDL. Methods Retrospective analysis of demographics, risk factors, vascular events, therapy, and lipid profile in outpatient clinical data. Inclusion criteria was adult age, diagnosis of polygenic hypercholesterolemia, and both indication and availability for Lp(a) measurement. Results Medical records of 258 patients with H-Lpa and 290 H-LDL were reviewed for occurrence of vascular events. The median duration of follow-up was 10 years (IQR 3–16). In spite of a similar reduction of LDL cholesterol, vascular events occurred more frequently, and approximately 7 years earlier (P = 0.024) in patients with H-Lpa than in H-LDL (HR 1.96 1.21–3.17, P = 0.006). The difference was around 10 years for acute events (TIA, Stroke, acute coronary events) and one year for chronic ones (P = 0.023 and 0.525, respectively). Occurrence of acute CAD was higher in H-Lpa men (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–7.9, P = 0.007) while, among women, PAD was observed exclusively in H-Lpa subjects with smoking habits (P = 0.009). Conclusions Patients with high Lp(a) levels suffer from a larger and earlier burden of the disease compared to those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone. These patients are at higher risk of CAD if they are men, and of PAD if they are women.

Epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia with or without high lipoprotein (a) levels 1

Introduction
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, despite prevention and treatment strategies based on lifestyle modifications, and management of its risk factors, namely smoking habits, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity.Hypercholesterolemia is a heterogeneous condition encompassing two main disorders, namely familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carrying LDL, LDLR, APOB, PCSK9-and LDLRAP1-related genetic defects, and polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PH) due to multiple genetic variants.Given the many genetic variants involved in its diagnosis, PH is diagnosed via primary hypercholesterolemia and negative genetic testing.While PH has a high prevalence in the population (1 out of 20 subjects) and accounts for the vast majority of atherosclerotic events, FH has a lower prevalence (1 out of 200-300 subjects) and a more severe and earlier occurrence (1)(2)(3).
Despite achieving the therapeutic goals for all cardiovascular risk factors in these patients, a residual risk persists; Lp(a) represents an emerging risk factor to explain such a discrepancy.Lp(a) is a circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in which a large glycoprotein, apolipoprotein(a) [Apo(a)], is bound via a disulfide bridge to apo B100 (4).Circulating Lp(a) levels are genetically determined by the LPA gene encoding Apo(a), and remain stable during a lifetime (5), with limited response to lipid-lowering drugs.Epidemiological, genetic, and Mendelian randomization studies provide strong evidence that Lp(a) is also associated with the development of ASCVD, i.e., coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and peripheral artery disease (PAD) (6-10), beyond calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) (11)(12)(13).Ex vivo or population studies show that high Lp(a) levels (or LPA polymorphisms) are associated with the development of plaques presenting features of vulnerability, namely lipid-rich necrotic core, thin or ruptured fibrous cap (14), and smooth muscle cell content (15).Also, in the same study, intraplaque hemorrhage and a higher degree of stenosis were observed more often in high Lp(a) women and men (16), respectively, when compared to plaques obtained from controls.
Association between high Lp(a) and FH is much higher than predicted by the prevalence of the genetic variants involved: while the prevalence of Lp(a) > 50 mg/dl is around 20% in the general European population, this figure rises to 29.2 (17) or 35.8% in FH (18).Such an association is less investigated in patients with PH, in spite of the higher contribution of these two conditions in the occurrence of ASCVD.Whether and how high Lp(a) levels modify the natural development and progression of atherosclerosis is not well defined.It can be hypothesized, therefore, that higher LP(a) levels are associated with more unstable or earlier patterns of atherosclerotic events.This study investigates the pattern of occurrence of vascular events according to Lp(a) levels (≥30 mg/dl) in a group of patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia attending a secondary level outpatient clinic in Northern Italy.In particular, we investigated whether there was a correlation between timing and frequency of occurrence of vascular event and Lp(a) levels, and whether the interaction between Lp(a) and gender could promote different settings of vascular events in specific vascular districts.

Study population
A single-center review of medical records was carried out in patients with PH attending a secondary level outpatient clinic (Clinica Medica Generale, ASUGI) from a University Hospital in the North-East of Italy.The center follows 3,600 patients yearly with different dyslipidemic disorders.All records of patients with indication to Lp(a) measurement according to the criteria identified by the consensus panel of the European Atherosclerosis Society (19) were selected.Namely, these criteria were: ≥5% 10-year risk of fatal ASCVD according to the European guidelines (20), patients with premature ASCVD, a family history of premature ASCVD with or without elevated Lp (a), and recurrent ASCVD despite statin treatment.Only patients with an in-house measurement of Lp(a) were considered.Venous blood samples were obtained at the time of admission to the Clinics according to the previously published protocol (21) and analyzed according to the standard methods in the central laboratory of the Hospital of Cattinara (Trieste, ITALY).The dosage of Lp(a), total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDLcholesterol, and triglycerides is expressed in mg/dl.The Lp(a) dosage was obtained by (isoform independent) immunoturbidimetric method with U-5800 Beckman analyzer.
The observation period for each patient started either with the index event or with the enrollment at the Center and ended on October 1st 2022.
Clinical data concerning arterial vascular events (type and timing), and cardiovascular risk factors as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), smoking, and family history of early (<60 if women, or <55 if man) coronary artery event in a first degree relative were considered.The definition of these conditions followed those previously published (21).The diagnosis of PH was set according to the recommendations in force at the time of determination (22).All subjects were screened with the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, which assigns points to risk factors in order to stratify the likelihood of diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia into one of four categories: definite (>8), probable (6)(7)(8), possible (3-5), and unlikely (<3), so FH was defined as a score ≥6 plus the positive result of a genetic test for LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, and LDLRAP1 (23,24), while PH was diagnosed in the remaining patients with negative genetic testing results, independent of the Dutch Lipid Score.Furthermore, exclusion criteria were an age of <18 years old, genetic diagnosis of heterozygous or homozygous FH, and patients with secondary hyperlipidemia or an incomplete medical record.Written informed consent was obtained from all patients; the study complies with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and approval of the ethical committee was previously obtained (21).
During the attendance at the center, the clinic enforced lifestyle changes and optimized lipid lowering drugs with regular follow-up examinations and monitoring of lipid levels.Any patient at high or moderately high risk who had lifestyle-related risk factors (e.g., obesity, physical inactivity, elevated triglyceride, low HDL-C, or metabolic syndrome) was considered as a candidate for therapeutic lifestyle changes regardless of LDL-C level.Only those patients who did not reach the therapeutic target after this primary approach were treated with lipid lowering drugs.For investigation of the effects of Lp(a), the patients with PH were split into 2 groups: one of 258 patients with hypercholesterolemia plus Lp(a) levels ≥ 30 mg/dl (H-Lpa) and another of 290 patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone (H-LDL) after matching the two groups for age and sex (Figure 1).
This study has been conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and an informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

FIGURE 1
Flow-chart of the study.H-Lpa: patients with hypercholesterolemia plus Lp(a) levels >30 mg/dl; H-LDL: patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone.This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by CEUR (Comitato Etico Unico Regionale Fvg) number 2017-Os-040-ASUITS.

Methodology of assessment of vascular events (ASCVD)
All those events occurring until the age of 75 for each patient and reported in a standardized Case Report Form were considered.Events had to be either documented (hospitalization or clinical records) or self-reported but, in the latter case, confirmed by a trained health care professional at the time of the report.
Trigger events leading to enrollment in the Center were also retrieved.In detail, the events considered were those encompassed by ASCVD (25), i.e., CAD (ischemic cardiopathy, myocardial infarction and its acute complications, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or percutaneous angioplasty/stent placement), ischemic stroke (cerebral infarction due to thrombosis or cerebral atherosclerosis or cerebrovascular syndromes), transient ischemic attack (TIA), carotid thromboendarterectomy (TEA), and PAD.To increase detail on the pathophysiology of Lp(a), analysis was further divided into acute (myocardial infarction and its acute complications, cerebral infarction, TIA) and chronic vascular events (ischemic heart disease, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous angioplasty/ stent placement, carotid thromboendarterectomy, and PAD).

Statistical analysis
Data was anonymized before handling.Continuous variables are described as median and interquartile values (IQR), while categorical variables are described as the absolute count and percent value within the group.The comparison of continuous variables between the two groups was conducted according to non-parametric statistics, i.e., with Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests for the comparison of continuous variables between different categories.The association between two dichotomous or categorical variables was tested with a c 2 test and Hazard Ratio with 95% confidence interval (95% C.I.).Changes of lipid parameters between first and last observation were compared with a generalized linear model test for repeated measurements, while also considering the interaction with the Lp(a) levels.In addition, Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine the time course of events during follow-up.To assess the importance of sex in the occurrence of events, Cox proportional hazards statistics were carried out for PAD or acute coronary events.Independent variables included in this analysis were high Lp(a) (1 = yes 0 = no), Dutch score (0-2 unlikely, 3-5 possible, 6-8 likely, >8 definite), smoking habit (0 = never, 1 = ever a smoker), Hypertension, Diabetes, and family history of early CV disease.To observe the effect of increasing Lp(a) levels on the incidence of events, the Lp(a) group was divided according to classes (0 = 30-50 1 = 50-100 2 = 100-150 3 = >150 mg/dl) and in patients below and above the median value (87 mg/dl).All analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 21.0 software (SPSS Chicago, IL).Statistical significance was considered for P values of <0.05.
In H-Lpa patients, the prevalence of diabetes and body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower compared to the H-LDL group.To rule out the interferences of diabetes on BMI, subanalysis was conducted in non-diabetic patients: lower BMI was observed only in non-diabetic H-Lpa women (P = 0.037).Among the remaining common atherosclerosis risk factors, hypertension (33%) and smoking habits, either current or past, had similar prevalence (34 vs. 39%).H-Lpa patients reported a significantly higher prevalence of premature cardiovascular events in the family history (P = 0.038).Other lipid biomarkers (total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides) were significantly higher among H-LDL subjects.Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the two groups (H-Lpa and H-LDL patients) are summarized in Table 1.
Concerning lipid-lowering drugs, statins were the most widely prescribed at the end of the follow-up: 57% H-Lpa and 65% H-LDL subjects were on statin therapy and the latter group used higher intensity principles or dosages of these drugs (P < 0.001).At enrollment, patients not assuming statins had significantly higher Lp(a) levels compared to those who did (80,5 IQR 53,3-118 vs. 13, IQR 5-52, P < .001).Such a difference did not correlate with higher prevalence of events (P = 0.424).Other low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering drugs that were used included ezetimibe, with higher prevalence in H-Lpa patients at the end of the follow-up (46.3 vs. 35.3%,P = 0.016), PCSK9 inhibitors were more frequently used in H-Lpa (3.7 vs. 0.7, P = 0.019), and lipoprotein apheresis were used in two high-risk patients for secondary prevention (both cases).Considering the effect of PCSK9 on Lp(a), a sub-analysis has been conducted on patients not assuming these drugs.The association between high Lp(a) levels and incidence of events has been substantially confirmed (P = 0.016).All patients, however, received a pharmacologic treatment for their condition.When the last lipid test for each patient was compared to baseline, there was a significant reduction in total LDL cholesterol and triglycerides in the whole population, with a difference between the two groups observed only for Triglycerides (P < .001).HDL cholesterol did not change significantly over time.
Vascular events have been observed approximately 7 years earlier in H-Lpa patients compared with H-LDL (57.5 IQR 47-65 vs. 65, IQR 58-71, P = 0.024).The associations of Lp(a) on the age and the burden of events were also confirmed with a Kaplan-Meier survival curve (Figure 2).The cumulative prevalence of all events was 1.49 100 pt/y in H-Lpa compared to 0.75 100 pt/y in H-LDL.When a higher cut-off Lp(a) level of 50 mg/dl was adopted, the results were confirmed but with a lower sensitivity (P = 0.007), (data not reported).
The earlier occurrence of events in H-Lpa was confirmed for the acute cases (i.e., TIA, Stroke, acute coronary events,) with patients who were 55 years old, IQR 41-63, vs. 65 years old, IQR 55-71, in H-Lpa and H-LDL, respectively (P = 0.023).On the contrary, chronic events (stable angina, TEA, or PAD) occurred at approximately 62 years old (IQR 55-67), and 63 years old (IQR 61-72) respectively (P = 0.525).Such a difference was confirmed with a Kaplan-Meier curve as in Figure 3. Within the group of H-Lpa patients, the incidence of events did not differ according to the Class of Lp(a) or according to median value (data not reported).
A description of each type of recorded vascular events, in total and divided by sex, is detailed in Table 2 and Hazard Ratio is described in Figure 4.Among the different vascular diseases, coronary events and PAD account for differences between H-Lpa and H-LDL, in particular ACS in men and PAD in women (Figure 5).In this latter case, Hazard Ratio and 95% C.I. could not be calculated due to 0 (zero) events in H-LDL women.

Cox regression analysis
Cox regression analysis investigated the interaction and association of Lp(a) with other known risk factors in the occurrence of PAD and of acute coronary syndromes.Acute coronary syndrome was more frequent in men with high Lp(a) and with a higher Dutch score, while in the analysis of PAD, the role of Lp-a could be demonstrated in women separated from men.The results are summarized in Table 3.

Discussion
Lp(a) can start and complicate atherosclerosis with different putative mechanisms (26,27) and Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) represents an independent risk index for ASCVD (26).Investigation on the relationship between Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) and Hypercholesterolemia has the potential to improve the management of cardiovascular risk.The main results of the present study are that, (a) the degree of association of high Lp(a) (>30 mg/dl) with polygenic hypercholesterolemia is higher than suspected; (b) that high Lp(a) worsens the pattern of vascular events, and that (c) such a risk is different according to sex and vascular district.
The first result is that Polygenic hypercholesterolemia is closely associated with increased Lp(a) levels in this study: while the prevalence in the general population is reported around 20%, in our study group it is well above 50%.Even considering a lower cutoff of 30 mg/dl, this cannot be attributed to chance.Such an association was already observed in familial hypercholesterolemia and in other combined forms of hypercholesterolemia (28).This finding can be attributed to a genuine association or to an Kaplan-Meier curve of occurrence of ischemic ASCVD events in the two study groups (P-value = .003).Horizontal lines represent median and interquartile values for age at the time of the events (P = .024,Mann-Whitney test).Solid line = H-Lpa and dotted line = H-LDL.

FIGURE 3
Event free survival curve Kaplan-Meier curve for occurrence of acute (A, unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, TIA, or stroke) or chronic (B, stable angina, transcutaneal endatherectomy TEA, PAD) ischemic ASCVD events.P value of Kaplan-Meier curve.036and .037,for panels A and B, respectively.Horizontal lines represent median and interquartile values for age at the time of the events (P = .023and .525Mann-Whitney test for comparisons of acute and chronic events, respectively).Solid line = H-Lpa, dotted line = H-LDL.increased likelihood of observing polygenic hypercholesterolemia in patients with high Lp(a) as in the conclusions of Trinder (18).
Our study also demonstrates that the risk of vascular events in high Lp(a) patients doubled, and events occur approximately 7 years earlier when compared with those observed in polygenic hypercholesterolemia.The quality of our follow-up for high Lp (a) patients is close to that observed in other specialized centers, even using Lp(a) apheresis ( 29) (1.49 vs. 1.5 100pt/year).The group of acute events, assumed to derive from rupture or erosion of the plaques, occurred (marginally) more often and earlier in Lp(a) patients than in PH alone, while the age of onset and prevalence were similar in those events related to progressive chronic growth of plaques (PAD, stable angina, and TEA).The increased prevalence of events in Hyper Lp(a) has also been observed by Schatz et al, on patients with a history of premature cardiovascular events (30).Our results corroborate Schatz's findings, expanding the comparison of Hyper Lp(a) to patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia and investigating the onset of all acute and chronic coronary and cerebral events, as well as peripheral arterial disease.Furthermore, consistent with the cited work, a 40% increase in a positive family history of vascular events was found in the present study in patients with elevated Lp(a).Other studies have observed earlier acute events in high Lp(a) within a court of early coronary heart disease (31), but not in comparison with FH (32).Our experience agrees with these two observations, since our comparator, polygenic hypercholesterolemia, is less severe and less precocious than FH.
The starting hypothesis, i.e., that acute events should prevail in carriers of high levels of Lp(a), is confirmed in the present study.This finding has a parallel in some histopathology studies Forrest plot, hazard ratio, 95% confidence intervals (C.I. 95%) and χ 2 P value of different vascular events according to high (≥30 mg/dl) or low (<30 mg/ dl) Lp(a) levels.When relevant, the analysis is split according to sex.N.A.= not applicable due to 0 events in H-LDL women.HR for men and women have been reported separately only when different between the two sexes.showing more prevalent features of instability, namely thin-cap fibroatheroma lipid-rich necrotic core and stenosis, in patients with high Lp(a) (14-16).The evidence that chronic events such as PAD also occur earlier in hyper Lp(a) may be explained by the finding of unstable plaques (calcified, with intraplaque hemorrhage and disrupted) in 72% of common iliac arteries of patients without symptoms of PAD (33).This suggests that the progression of PAD may also occur through accumulation of small acute events in large arteries.
The third main result is that the interaction between Lp(a) and gender promotes a different setting of vascular events.In the present study we observe a significant relationship between high lipoprotein (a) and acute coronary events, mainly in men.This evidence is confirmed by the Cox analysis, which identifies male sex, LDL cholesterol, Lp(a) and Dutch Lipid score as variables which can predict coronary events.The higher prevalence of events in male patients could be explained by assuming that some features of plaque instability are more frequent in men than in women.In fact, the study of Van Dam-Nolen and coworkers reports that stenotic plaques are more prevalent in men with high Lp(a) than in women (34).It could be hypothesized that constrictive remodeling of plaques in men triggers events in coronary arteries, since they are the smallest vessels investigated.
Furthermore, we have identified a connection between PAD and women with high Lp(a).In literature, smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus are classically associated with the development of PAD (35,36), although observational studies show that higher Lp(a) concentrations are also an independent risk factor for this condition (37).Such an association has been found in some studies (38)(39)(40) while others did not achieve such a result (41,42).In our study, among women, PAD is observed exclusively in women who were (current or former) smokers and with high Lp(a).The Cox regression analysis only partially confirmed the univariate results, probably because of a lower event rate for this complication.The most likely explanation of this evidence showing a role of Lp(a) only in women is that some plaque features in patients with high Lp(a) are preferentially observed in this sex and explain the progression of PAD.This situation has been described in the study of van dam Nolen, which reports that intraplaque hemorrhages have been observed more frequently in female patients with high Lp(a) (16).How Lp(a) can support the development and progression of PAD through intraplaque hemorrhage can only be conjectured.Ex vivo studies show that Lp(a) enhances angiogenesis in the chorioallantoic membrane (43) and this could synergize with the development of an abnormal angiogenesis observed in smoking (44) leading to an enhanced plaque development.This pathophysiology might lead to increased bleeding into plaques Kaplan-Meier curve of occurrence of acute coronary events in men (panel A, P = .007)and of PAD in women (panel B, P = .009)in the two study groups.Solid H-Lpa and dotted H-LDL.and contribute to the progress of atherosclerosis in large arteries such as those supplying the lower limbs.Another important point, overturning all naïve concepts, is that the prevalence of vulnerability characteristics changes over time and some associations might be lost across long term observations (45).These changes are particularly important in women, whose hormonal pattern evolution affects the immune, inflammatory, and coagulative response.Finally, differences in prevalence of lipid-lowering drug use and diabetes observed in the two populations need to be highlighted and commented on.The lower intensity of statins in Lp(a) patients in our study (with minimal modifications during followup) is in accordance with the recommendations of Tsimikas et al, reporting a possible increase in Lp(a) levels during higher intensity statins (46) and therefore suggesting a reduction in their intensity.Indeed, there is no general agreement on this effect, with some studies showing a 10 to 20% increase in Lp(a) (46), and others not observing this result (47,48).This difference in intensity was associated with a similar pattern of lipid profile modifications, but the incidence of events remained higher in Lp(a).Whether this is due to an intensified influx and adhesiveness of Lp(a)-LDL particles into the vessel matrix (subendothelium) or insufficient pleiotropic of statins is not known and deserves further investigation, such as adding another arm in the comparison, namely AntiSense Oligonucleotide and siRNA targeting LPA.One speculation on the early age of events in a comparable dyslipidemia (LDL-cholesterol) setting is that Lp (a) might hinder an antiatherogenic mechanism which could be the release of LDL complex from the subendothelial layer of lesion prone arteries.This implies a dynamic trafficking of LDL within the lesions, as demonstrated by Jagannathan et al. (49), and Lp(a) acting as an element favoring the permanence of LDL within the growing plaque.
Another point is that Lp(a) lowers the risk of diabetes (50, 51), and therefore fewer patients with high Lp(a) and diabetes were expected (and actually found) in our study.This difference definitely hinders a precise comparison of the two populations and might be recognized as a confounder, although this result reflects the accuracy of patient selection.Since diabetes is a major contributor to vascular atherosclerotic burden, its reduced prevalence in high Lp(a) patients should have also reduced the prevalence of events, while the opposite has been observed.M. Kostner et al. calls this phenomenon "The Lp(a) Paradox in Diabetes Mellitus" (52): patients with Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may have reduced Lp(a) due to mutations or polymorphisms in genes that affect the expression of the APOA gene, and it could explain the evidence that T2DM patients have lower Lp(a) plasma levels in comparison to individuals without T2DM.
The choice of a cutoff level at 30 mg/dl requires some explanation.In spite of the ESC/EAS recommendation of a cutoff value of 50 mg/dl, the literature has not unanimously identified such an Lp(a) value as critical for the increase in cardiovascular risk (53)(54)(55)(56)(57). Indeed, we also assessed the cutoff value of 50 mg/ dl (data not reported) but the results were consistent with those obtained with the lower cut off at 30 mg/dl and, moreover, included 31 more subjects and 5 events (3CVD, 1 TIA and 1 Stroke) in the HLp(a) patients, which increased the sensitivity of the comparison.
Some limitations of the present study have to be acknowledged.A large multicenter prospective study would have granted subanalysis of other conditions, although the present report (encompassing polygenic hypercholesterolemia) is one of the largest in literature.Although a prospective study investigating the general population would have provided a more complete picture of the Lp(a) epidemiology, it would have required a follow-up of decades and significant financial and logistic support.Another potential limitation is that no fatal events were recorded.The effect of fatal events on the overall vascular burden is not well established for Lp(a), but with a fatality rate of cerebral and coronary vascular events under 10% in different studies, the inclusion of fatal events would have probably changed the final figures, but with only a small effect on the results of the present study.Furthermore, we did not reassess Lp (a) plasma levels following statins, mainly because guidelines in force during the follow-up did not recommend repeating such a measurement and the immunoturbidimetric method is not influenced by the different Lp(a) isoforms (58,59).
In conclusion, this retrospective case-control study shows a significantly increased risk of ASCVD events in patients with high Lp(a) levels in comparison with patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia. Vascular events also occur earlier in high Lp(a) patients, specifically, the incidence of acute CAD events was higher in high Lp(a) men, and that of PAD events was higher in high-Lpa smoker women.

TABLE 1
Clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory characteristics of the study group, divided according to the type of dyslipidemia.Data are reported as absolute values and percentage within the group or median and interquartile values, all values of lipid profile are expressed in mg/dl.

TABLE 2
Prevalence of vascular events in the two study groups.ACS, acute coronary syndrome; PAD, peripheral arterial disease; P-value = χ 2 square test; P men = P value of χ 2 test among men; P women = P value of χ 2 test among women.

TABLE 3
Final steps of Cox proportional hazards analysis of risk factor for the age of diagnosis of ACS and PAD according to sex and Lp(a).