Seasonal Variations of Chemical Weathering and CO2 Consumption Processes in the Headwater (Datong River Basin) of the Yellow River Draining the Tibetan Plateau

The Yellow River basin covers contrasting tectonics, climate, and vegetation settings. To explore the seasonal chemical weathering differences from the upstream to downstream of the Yellow River basin, we collected weekly river waters from the Datong River draining the Tibetan Plateau in 2017. Our results show remarkably seasonal variations of major ions. A forward model was employed to quantify the contribution of silicate, carbonate, and sulfide oxidation/evaporite and atmospheric input to the cations, which yielded the contributions of 9.21 ± 1.57%, 46.07 ± 1.4%, 21.46 ± 1.03%, and 23.26 ± 1.72%, respectively, indicating a dominated carbonate weathering to the river chemistry. The significant correlation between the carbonate weathering rate and runoff suggests a critical runoff control on chemical weathering in the Datong River catchment. A comprehensive comparison between the upper and middle-lower reaches of the Yellow River basin shows a declined silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rate (ØCO2sil) from the upstream to downstream. In contrast, the physical erosion rate shows an increased trend, with the most prominent increase in the midstream Loess Plateau. A further comparison between the Yellow River draining the Tibetan Plateau and the Loess Plateau shows 4.5 times higher ØCO2sil but 9.5 times lower erosion rate. In conclusion, we propose that the runoff, rather than erosion, plays a central role on chemical weathering in the Yellow River basin, which provides insight for in-depth understanding the surficial weathering and the global carbon cycle.

The Yellow River, the fifth longest river in the world and the second largest in China by both length (5,464 km) and basin area (752,400 km 2 ), is famous for its extremely high sediment load (Milliman and Farnsworth, 2011). The sediment flux transported to the oceans has been previously estimated to be up to 1,100 × 10 6 t/yr, accompanying a solute flux of~21 × 10 3 t/yr (Milliman and Farnsworth, 2011). This river originates from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), drains through the Loess Plateau (LP) at middle reaches, and finally flows through the downstream floodplain into the ocean. The contrasting climates, vegetations, and geomorphic settings between the tectonically active QTP and the erodible LP provide ideal conditions for in-depth understanding the weathering process under different climate and tectonic backgrounds.
Previous studies have investigated the river water chemistry and weathering processes of the Yellow River. For example, Hu et al. (1982) first reported that the solute chemistry of the Yellow River was affected by evaporites and silicate weathering and carbonate precipitation. Then, Zhang et al. (1995) conducted a detailed research and proposed that chemical weathering is the primary control of river chemistry. In the following decades, various methods, such as trace elemental and isotopic indicators, have been applied to explore the chemical weathering processes and fluxes in the Yellow River basin (e.g., Wu et al., 2005;Fan et al., 2014;Ran et al., 2015;Zhang et al., 2015;Wang et al., 2016;Li et al., 2020;Qu et al., 2020;Chai et al., 2021). Among them, most are one-time spatial sampling during flood seasons. As seasonal chemical compositions of river waters could be quite different (e.g., Zhang et al., 2013a;Ran et al., 2015), previous studies warned that estimates of weathering and CO 2 consumption rates could be biased by sampling at rain and/or dry seasons only, or missing details from extreme storm events (Zhang et al., 2015). Moon et al. (2014) also suggested that at least 10 time-series seasonal data with synchronous discharge are necessary to reduce the uncertainties of silicate weathering estimates. Till now, there are only four sets of time-series sampling (three at the Loess Plateau and one at the lower reach) in the Yellow River at the middle-lower reaches (Ran et al., 2015;Zhang et al., 2015). However, such a seasonal study of the weathering process in the upstream of the Yellow River draining the QTP, supplying for 80% of the total TDS flux for the mouth of the Yellow River (Wu et al., 2005), is still lacking, which prevents the accurate estimation of the chemical weathering flux and CO 2 consumption rate in the tectonically active QTP.
To better understand the seasonal weathering process and its sensitivity to hydrological change in the upstream Yellow River, we conducted weekly sampling in the Datong River during the whole 2017 at the Qingshizui hydrological station. The Datong River is a major tributary of the upstream Yellow River. It originates from the Qilian Mountains, northeastern of the QTP. The pristine watershed has not been affected by human activities. This study investigated seasonal chemical compositions of river waters, quantified the relative contribution of different sources to the water solutes, and estimated chemical weathering and the CO 2 consumption rate of the Datong River. Finally, we compared time-series river water chemistry and weathering processes between the upper and middle-lower reaches of the Yellow River to reveal the weathering differences in the entire Yellow River basin.

GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND
The Datong River basin is located at the upstream of the Yellow River (between 98°30′ to 105°15′E and 36°30′ to 38°25′N), northeastern QTP ( Figure 1). The elevation of the Datong basin is high in the northwest and low in the southeast with more than 80% of the basin >3,000 m. The drainage basin is bonded by two NW-SE mountains with the Datong Mountain at the south and the Tuolai Mountain at the north. The Datong River basin is a tectonic denudation mountainous area with hilly glacier accumulation platforms and alluvial plains. The total length of the Datong River is 560 km. The sampling site in this study is located in the upstream of the Datong River at the Qingshizui hydrological station, which covers a catchment area of 8,011 km 2 and a river length of 310 km.
The study area belongs to the typical plateau continental climate and is affected by the Asian summer monsoon and the winter monsoon. The climate is characterized by cold, long winter, and short summer. According to the data of the Qingshizui hydrological station, the precipitation mainly occurs from May to September (summer), accounting for 85%-92% of the annual precipitation. The total annual runoff of the Datong River is 293 mm. The discharge is high from June to September, accounting for >80% of the annual discharge.
The Datong River is dominated by sedimentary rocks, mainly composed of marine and terrestrial clastics, carbonates, and unconsolidated sediments, with minor volcanic and metamorphic rocks. Quartz sandstone, siltstone, calcareous siltstone, and coal seams are exposed in the study area. Limestone and dolomite are distributed in the south bank tributaries, and sandstone, mudstone, and coal seams are distributed in the north bank tributaries.

SAMPLES AND ANALYSIS
A total of 48 river water samples were collected weekly in the Datong River at the Qingshizui hydrological station from January to December 2017. Five rainwater samples were collected during the monsoon season in 2016. Water temperature, pH, electrical conductibility (EC), and total dissolved solids (TDS) were measured in situ by HANNA HI98129. Suspended particle matter (SPM) concentration, river water discharge (Q), precipitation (P), and water temperature (T) were monitored daily at the hydrology station.
Water samples were filtered in situ on collection through 0.45 μm Whatman ® nylon filters. For cation analysis, 60 mL filtered samples were stored in precleaned polyethylene bottles and acidified to pH < 2 with 6 M distilled HNO 3 . For anion measurement, 30 mL filtered samples were stored in polyethylene bottles. Each sample bottle cap is wrapped with a sealing film to prevent leakage. All samples were kept chilled at 4°C until analysis.
Major cations (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + , K + , Sr 2+ , and SiO 2 ) were analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) with the average reproducibility of 1%-2%, and major anions (F − , Cl − , NO 3 − , and SO 4 2-) were determined by the 940 professional IC with the precision <0.1%. The above measurements were conducted at the Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IEECAS). DIC concentration was calculated through ionic discharge balance. Five samples (QSZ16-34, QSZ16-47, QSZ16-55, QSZ16-69, and QSZ16-75) were randomly selected and titrated by the Meck alkalinity test suite with the precision of 0.05 mM to examine the validity of the calculated DIC results. Both methods produced consistent results with a relative deviation <5%.

Hydrochemical Parameter Variations
The pH, water temperature, EC, precipitations, discharges, and major ion concentrations of water samples in the Datong River are summed in Table 1. The water temperature varied from 1.8 to 17.1°C, with an average of 8.30 ± 4.28°C ( Figure 2). The pH and EC ranged from 7.89 to 8.77 with an average of 8.26 ± 0.21, and from 320 to 390 μS/cm with an average of 363 ± 18 μS/ cm, respectively. The maximum discharge of 117 m 3 /s occurred in June, and the mean daily discharge for the entire year was 73 m 3 /s. The discharge can be divided into two regimes that correspond to the monsoon climate: low-flow (October to May) and high-flow (June to September).

Seasonal Variations of Major Ions in River Waters
All the physico-chemical parameters presented clear seasonal variations in the Datong River catchment (Figure 2).  FIGURE 3 | Proportion of (A) major cations (B) major anions in river water of the Datong River basin. The middle reaches data (Longmen) come from Zhang et al. (2015) and the downstream data (Lijin) come from Ran et al. (2015).
Frontiers in Earth Science | www.frontiersin.org June 2022 | Volume 10 | Article 909749 5 Precipitation mainly occurred from late April to October in 2017. Previous studies in surrounding catchments reported several orders of magnitude changes of seasonal river discharge (Zhang et al., 2013a). However, in this study, river discharge only showed a slight increase (~3-fold) from dry to flood seasons and did not show a synchronous variation with precipitation, which can be attributed to the damming effect at the upstream of the Qingshizui hydrological station. The water temperature rose from January to the peak in August and then declined to the lowest in December. The major ion concentrations were systematically lower in rainy season and higher in dry season, opposite to the trend of the water temperature. Although major ions displayed similar seasonal variations, minor differences still existed, e.g., the concentrations of K + , Na + , Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , HCO 3 − , and SO 4 2slightly increased from January to early April and then rapidly declined with increasing monsoonal rainfall. The concentration of NO 3 − increased sharply from January to April, but its minimum value appeared in January rather than in August as other ions. Overall, the similarities of the seasonal variations of ions reflect the dilution effect of precipitation in rainy season.

Seasonal Differences of Major Ions
Between the Upper vs. Middle to Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Spatially, there are two typical characters of river water chemistry between the upper vs. middle to lower reaches of the Yellow River ( Figure 4). 1) All major ion concentrations (excluding Ca 2+ ) in the upper reach (Datong River) were lower than the middle (Longmen) to lower reaches (Lijin) of the Yellow River, while the concentrations in the midstream were comparable with the downstream. 2) The Na + , Cl − , and SO 4 2in the middle to lower reaches were significantly higher than that of the upper reach of the Yellow River, for which the Na + and Cl − are 8 × and 16 × higher in the middle relative to the upper reaches. These extremely high concentrations suggest an important contribution of evaporite dissolution during weathering in the Loess Plateau. The spatial differences and evaporite contribution can also be observed in Figure 3.
Seasonally, we further selected the weekly data of the Datong River in the upper reach and the Longmen station in the middle reach for comparison to reveal their differences ( Figure 5). The major similarities are as follows: 1) The overall seasonal variations pattern is similar, showing lower ion concentrations during the monsoonal period, and higher values during the dry seasons. 2) As pointed out by Zhang et al. (2015) that there was a snow/ice melting imprint during spring seasons (around April) in the middle reach of the Yellow River at the Longmen station, the imprint can also be identified in the upstream Datong River. This is supported by the first peak of the water discharge during March to April in the Longmen station. Importantly, the consistent melting fingerprint indicates that the melting signal can be directly propagated to the middle reaches of the Yellow River, implying the significant contribution of water discharge from the upstream Tibetan Plateau to the downstream in dry season. Obviously, the large ice/glacier reservoir exists in the Tibetan Plateau, rather than in the Loess plateau. In addition, the increasing ion concentrations during the melting period in the Datong River is also helpful to explain the observed pulse-type increase of ion contents in the downstream Longmen station. Here, we think the increased ion concentration in the Datong River most likely reflect the salt-contained dust deposition during frequently spring dust-storm events (Jin et al., 2011).
There is also a clear difference between the upper and middle reaches ( Figure 5). During the flood season (July to September), all the ion concentration in the upstream and midstream was diluted to the lowest, but it is interesting to find that unlike the upstream, the concentration of Na + , Cl − , and SO 2-4 in the midstream Longmen began to increase (Figures 5C,F,G), indicating the fast dissolution of evaporite during the rainy season in the Loess Plateau. This reflects their distinct control mechanisms of weathering processes between the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River.

Sources of Dissolved Loads in the Datong River
The dissolved loads of river water are generally affected by natural (e.g., atmospheric inputs and chemical weathering) and anthropogenic activity (Roy et al., 1999;Moon et al., 2007;Moquet et al., 2011). In this study, damming at the upstream FIGURE 6 | Plot of Ca 2+ +Mg 2+ versus HCO 3 − and Si 4+ /Na + versus Ca 2+ +Na + of river water in the Datong River. The data suggest potential carbonate and silicate weathering in the Datong River catchment.
FIGURE 7 | Elemental ratios of Ca 2+ /Na + vs. Mg 2+ /Na + and Ca 2+ /Na + vs. HCO 3 − /Na + of river water in the Datong River. The endmember values are from Gaillardet et al. (1999). The middle reaches data (Longmen) come from Zhang et al. (2015). The downstream data (Lijin) come from Ran et al. (2015). of the Datong River may significantly alter the river discharge. However, weekly major ions show clear seasonal variations with dilution effects by monsoonal rainfall, implying that damming has limited impacts on seasonal variations of water chemistry in the Datong River. Due to the sparse population, the input of human activities to river chemistry could be negligible. This is supported by the very low weekly NO 3 − concentrations (<50 μmol/L), which is comparable with other regions in the QTP that suggested a minor influence from anthropogenic input, e.g., the Jinsha River and Yarlung Tsangpo River Qu et al., 2017).
Globally, river hydrochemistry is commonly affected by carbonate weathering, which mainly supplies Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and HCO 3 − to the dissolved load (Gaillardet et al., 2019). The dominance of HCO 3 − and Ca 2+ in the Datong River, together with their higher concentrations than other QTP-originated rivers draining basalt and granite lithology, such as the Min River (960 μM, 1,970 μM) and Jinsha River (931 μM, 2,066 μΜ) (Zhong et al., 2017), indicates that carbonate weathering may have occurred in the watershed. This is consistent with the significant correlation (r 2 = 0.95) between (Ca 2+ + Mg 2+ ) and HCO 3 − ( Figure 6A). Evaporite dissolution has been proposed to play an important role in arid and semi-arid regions (Fan et al., 2014). Halite dissolution could release Na + and Cl − to river water at 1:1 stoichiometry. However, no evaporite exposed in the watershed (Figure 1) suggests that halite dissolution seems not to be a major factor in controlling the weathering in this region, in particular when considering the very high contents of Na + and Cl − in the middle to lower reaches of the Yellow River. Si is generally derived from silicate weathering. The good correlation between Ca 2+ /Na + and Si/Na + (r 2 = 0.82) ( Figure 6B) indicates that silicate weathering is another player in weathering processes in the QTP river basin. The carbonate and silicate weathering in the upstream Datong River catchment is also observed by element ratios, showing the data points between carbonate and silicate endmembers (e.g., Ca/Na vs. Mg/Na, Figure 7).

Atmospheric Input
Atmospheric deposition is one of the sources for ions in river (Liu et al., 2016a;Liu et al., 2016b). The purpose of correcting atmospheric input is to quantify the contribution of rainwater to the chemical composition of river water. We collected five rainwater samples (Table 2) in the study area and followed the calibration method of Grosbois et al. (2000): where X p refers to the corrected concentration derived from rainwater, (X/Cl) rain refers to the measured ion/ Cl in rain water, and Cl ref is the Cl − concentration in river water derived from rainwater, where Cl ave is the weighted mean of the Cl − concentration in rain samples and F is a correction factor and calculated as follows: where P is the annual precipitation (in mm) and E is the annual evapotranspiration (in mm). According to the 2017 hydrological data monitored by the Qingshizui hydrological station, the annual rainfall of the Datong River is 557 mm, and the annual discharge is 293 mm (P-E). The calculated F value is 1.9. The quantified result shows that the contribution of rainwater to the dissolved load of the Datong River is 20.2%-27.5% and increases with the runoff, indicating the non-negligible atmospheric contribution to the river water.

Rock Weathering
Weathering of silicates can contribute Na + , K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ to the dissolved load. The contribution of silicate weathering to river water cations is as follows: Na sil Na river − Na rain − Na halit , (4) Na halit Cl halit − Cl river − Cl rain , (5) K sil ≃ K riv , (6) Ca sil Na sil × (Ca/Na) sil , Mg sil Na sil × Mg Na sil , where (Ca 2+ /Na + ) sil and (Mg 2+ /Na + ) sil are the molar ratios released to river water from silicates during weathering. The (Ca 2+ /Na + ) sil and (Mg 2+ /Na + ) sil in this study are 0.35 and 0.24, respectively, based on the data from Gaillardet et al. (1999). The calculated results show that contributions of silicate weathering range from 6.1 to 11.9%, with an average of 9.2% in the Datong River catchment. Among them, the silicate contribution in the dry period (January-May and October-December) is 9.74%, higher than the monsoon period (June-September) of 7.45%, which is consistent with the previous studies (Zhang et al., 2015;Yu et al., 2019). The lower contribution in the monsoonal season reflects short water-rock reaction time, which inhibits the weathering of silicate minerals (Jiang et al., 2018). Carbonate weathering releases Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ to river, and the calculation for carbonate contribution is as follows: Ca carb Ca river − Ca rain − Ca sil , (9) Mg carb Mg river − Mg rain − Mg sil .
The results show that the contributions of carbonate weathering range from 43.8 to 47.6% with an average of 46.1% ( Table 3), indicating that carbonate weathering dominated the river chemistry in the Datong River catchment. Different from silicate weathering, the contribution of carbonate dissolution to dissolved loads is higher in the monsoon period than in the dry period. This is due to the fast carbonate dissolution dynamics relative to silicates in the rainy season (Zhang et al., 2013a;Zhang et al., 2013b;Gaillardet et al., 2019).

Evaporite Dissolution and Sulfide Oxidation
Evaporite weathering generally includes halite and gypsum. River water SO 4 2can be derived from gypsum dissolution or oxidation of sulfides. The weak correlation between SO 4 2and Cl − (r 2 = 0.10) indicates that the dissolution of gypsum in the Datong River basin is not a major source for river SO 4 2-. Figure 7 shows that most river water samples collected in the Datong River basin are far away from the evaporite endmember. Moreover, considering the coal mining in this area, we assumed that SO 4 2was mainly derived from sulfide oxidation rather than the dissolution of gypsum. Then, the rest of the weathering contribution from evaporite and oxidation of sulfides can be simply estimated as follows: Sulfide oxidation and Evaporite% The contribution of sulfide oxidation and evaporite ranged from 19.5 to 23.7% with an average of 21.5%. In summary, the order of the contribution ratios of different sources to dissolved load in the Datong River is as follows: carbonate dissolution > atmospheric input ≈ sulfide oxidation and evaporite > silicate weathering (Figure 8).

Chemical Weathering Rate
The carbonate weathering rate (CWR) and silicate weathering rate (SWR) are calculated based on cation components derived from carbonate and silicate, drainage area, and runoff (Moon et al., 2007;Zhang et al., 2013a;Liu et al., 2018). CWR and SWR can be calculated as follows: The calculated results showed that the SWR and CWR of the Datong River catchment ranged from 0.38 to 1.52 × 10 5 mol/km 2 / yr with an average of 1.05 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr and 2.04 to 7.45 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr with an average of 4.71 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr, respectively ( Table 4).

Rates of CO 2 Consumption by Chemical Weathering
Assuming the sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) generated by sulfide oxidation reacts preferentially with carbonate (Zhang et al., 2013a), the CO 2 consumption rate caused by silicate (ØCO 2sil ) and carbonate weathering (ØCO 2carb ) can be calculated from the flux of total dissolved cations produced by silicate and carbonate weathering, respectively: The CO 2 consumption rates from silicate and carbonate weathering (ØCO 2sil and ØCO 2carb ) of the Datong River catchment are 0.69 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr and 4.76 × 10 5 mol/km 2 / yr, respectively. If all H 2 SO 4 generated by sulfide oxidation reacts preferentially with silicate, the ØCO 2sil are negative.

Controls on Chemical Weathering Rate and ØCO 2
Lithology, climate (runoff/precipitation and temperature), and erosion rate are proposed to major factors that control the chemical weathering rate (Singh et al., 2005;Goldsmith et al., 2010;Zhang et al., 2019).
In the Datong River catchment, the ØCO 2carb show significant correlations with Q during both rainy (r 2 = 0.94) and dry seasons (r 2 = 0.93) ( Figure 9B), highlighting a strong control of runoff on carbonate weathering. For the ØCO 2 of silicate, weak positive correlations are observed between ØCO 2sil and Q in both rainy and dry seasons ( Figure 9A). In addition, no obvious correlation is observed between ØCO 2 and water temperature either during the rainy or dry season for both carbonate and silicate weathering ( Figures 9C,D). Although several studies suggested an important temperature control on weathering (Dessert et al., 2005;Dixon et al., 2010), this is not the case in the Datong River catchment, and our results are consistent with other studies proposing that when interpreting the weathering rate in the environment, there is an inseparable relationship between the chemical weathering rate and discharge (Hren et al., 2007;Noh et al., 2009;Maher et al., 2010), but no obvious effect by temperature (Huh, 2003;Riebe et al., 2004;Hagedorn and Cartwright, 2009).

Weathering Differences From the Upper to Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Basin
The huge Yellow River basin spans contrasting tectonics, climate, vegetation, and lithology settings, which may lead to significant changes in the weathering process from the upstream to the downstream. Fan et al. (2014) reported that the CO 2 consumption rate of silicate in the upstream of the Yellow River was 0.14 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr, lower than 0.69 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr of the Datong River catchment calculated by precise weekly data. In the midstream to lower reaches of the Yellow River, the estimated FIGURE 10 | Differences in chemical weathering among stations in the Yellow River basin. The ØCO 2sil overall decreases from the upstream to the downstream of the Yellow River in (C), whereas the physical erosion rate (PER) shows an increase trend in (D). The Datong data (DT) come from this study, the Longmen data (LM) come from Zhang et al. (2015), the Toudaoguai (TDG), Tongguan (TG), and Lijin (LJ) data come from Ran et al. (2015). Study areas in this study and the compiled data are shown in (A). The monthly average precipitation of the Yellow River basin from 2000 to 2020 is shown in (B).
To comprehensively explore the accurate chemical weathering differences in different parts of the entire Yellow River basin, we therefore focus on the time-series sampling data (weekly or monthly) at the upstream (Datong River), midstream (Toudaoguai, Longmen, and Tongguan), and downstream (Lijin) ( Figure 10A). An important point is that the ØCO 2sil in each site varies in several orders of magnitudes, indicating that estimating the ØCO 2 by using one-time sampling at flood or dry seasons would introduce large uncertainties. It is also interesting to find that the overall trend of ØCO 2 decreases from the upstream to the downstream ( Figure 10B). In contrast, the physical erosion rate (PER) increases dramatically from the upstream to the midstream and then declines at the downstream ( Figure 10C). The most remarkable increase is between the midstream Toudaoguai and Tongguan, where the Yellow River drains the Chinese Loess Plateau.
In order to in-depth compare the weathering differences between the tectonically active Tibetan Plateau and the erodible Loess Plateau (Figure 11), we calculated the ØCO 2sil between the Toudaoguai and Tongguan section (TDG-TG) of the Yellow River, where Loess weathering dominates the surficial weathering processes. The results show that ØCO 2sil in the Datong River draining the Tibetan Plateau is 4.5 times higher than the Loess Plateau ( Figure 11A). However, the PER is 9.5 times lower ( Figure 11B). These results suggest that physical erosion is not a major factor controlling the weathering rates in the Yellow River basin. Given that the runoff in the Datong River (293 mm/yr in 2017) is much higher than the TDG-TG (53 mm/yr in 2013), showing a 5.5 times higher values, and very similar with the 4.5 times higher ØCO 2sil . We therefore propose that the runoff exerts a central role in silicate weathering and atmospheric CO 2 drawdown in the Yellow River basin.

CONCLUSION
A high frequency sampling (weekly) was conducted in the Datong River, through a whole hydrological year in 2017 to explore the chemical weathering processes in the upstream of the Yellow River draining the Tibetan Plateau. Our results show significantly seasonal changes of major ions, with lower concentrations in the monsoon period owing to the dilution effect by precipitation, and higher in the dry season. The largest contribution to the river solute in the Datong River was from carbonate weathering (46.07 ± 1.4%), while contribution from silicate weathering is minor (9.21 ± 1.57%). The ØCO 2sil was 0.69 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr in the upper reaches of the Yellow River at the Datong catchment. Comparing the middle and lower reaches, the silicate weathering and ØCO 2sil show an overall decline trend by using five sets of weekly datasets, whereas the PER shows an increased trend. Finally, a comparison between the Yellow River draining the upstream Tibetan Plateau and the midstream Loess Plateau show 4.5 times higher ØCO 2sil but 9.5 times lower PER. Together with annual runoff data, we propose that the runoff, rather than erosion, plays a central role on chemical weathering in the huge Yellow River basin.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
FIGURE 11 | Differences in (A) weathering and (B) erosion rates between the Tibet Plateau and Loess Plateau. The ØCO 2 sil (0.69 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr) calculated by the time-series data of the Datong River (DT) is within the range of spatial data (0.14-0.88 × 10 5 mol/km 2 /yr) at upper reaches of the Yellow River. The maximum value of the ØCO 2 sil in the Tibet Plateau is 0.88 (at Lanzhou from Wu et al., 2005), the minimum value (at Tao River from Wu et al., 2005) is 0.14, and the average value is 0.50; the Loess Plateau data from Tongguan to Toudaoguai (TG-TDG) come from Ran et al. (2015). The physical erosion rate (PER) is estimated by suspended sediment data during 2013 from local hydrological stations.