Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on Grafted Nanofibrous Adsorbents Functionalized Using Different Amines

Of late, the demand for new CO2 adsorbents with high adsorption capacity and stability is growing very fast. Nanofibrous adsorbents are potential materials for such application with most attempts made on carbon nanofibers. In this study, a series of electrospun nanofibrous adsorbents containing amines were prepared using a 3-stage promising approach and tested comparatively for CO2 capture. The preparation of adsorbents involved electrospinning of syndiotactic polypropylene (s-PP) solution, radiation-induced grafting (RIG) of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) onto electrospun nanofibers, and functionalization of poly-GMA grafted s-PP nanofibrous mats with different amines, including ethanolamine (EA) diethylamine (DEA) and triethylamine (TEA). The effect of different amination parameters: namely, amine concentration, reaction time, temperature, and degree of grafting (DG) on the degree of amination (DA), was evaluated. The nanofibrous mats containing amine were tested for CO2 adsorption in a fixed bed column operated under various parameters such as amine density, amine type, initial CO2 concentration and temperature. The adsorbents recorded CO2 adsorption capacities of 2.87, 2.06 and 0.94 mmol/g for EA-, DEA- and TEA-containing adsorbents, respectively, at 30° C using initial CO2 concentration of 15%. This was coupled with the same order of high amine efficiency of 75, 57, and 31%. Results demonstrated that the nanofibrous adsorbent containing amine had strong potential for CO2 capture application.

Of late, the demand for new CO 2 adsorbents with high adsorption capacity and stability is growing very fast. Nanofibrous adsorbents are potential materials for such application with most attempts made on carbon nanofibers. In this study, a series of electrospun nanofibrous adsorbents containing amines were prepared using a 3-stage promising approach and tested comparatively for CO 2 capture. The preparation of adsorbents involved electrospinning of syndiotactic polypropylene (s-PP) solution, radiation-induced grafting (RIG) of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) onto electrospun nanofibers, and functionalization of poly-GMA grafted s-PP nanofibrous mats with different amines, including ethanolamine (EA) diethylamine (DEA) and triethylamine (TEA). The effect of different amination parameters: namely, amine concentration, reaction time, temperature, and degree of grafting (DG) on the degree of amination (DA), was evaluated. The nanofibrous mats containing amine were tested for CO 2 adsorption in a fixed bed column operated under various parameters such as amine density, amine type, initial CO 2 concentration and temperature. The adsorbents recorded CO 2 adsorption capacities of 2.87, 2.06, and 0.94 mmol/g for EA-, DEA-and TEA-containing adsorbents, respectively, at 30 • C using initial CO 2 concentration of 15%. This was coupled with the same order of high amine efficiency of 75, 57, and 31%. Results demonstrated that the nanofibrous adsorbent containing amine had strong potential for CO 2 capture application.

INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, fossil fuels are the primary source for coping with high energy demand around the world. Consequently, this has led to a large amount of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) being released into the atmosphere. Over the past 50 years, the amount of CO 2 has risen from 310 ppm to more than 390 ppm bringing about air pollution and global warming (Wahiduzzaman et al., 2015). Although there are several techniques commercially available for mitigating CO 2 released into the atmosphere, there is still a high demand for highly efficient and low-cost adsorbents for capturing CO 2 from various systems, including flue gas.
The most commonly used technique for CO 2 capture is liquid amine absorption, also known as amine scrubbing. However, this technique has some limitations, including high energy demand, amine decomposition during regeneration and equipment corrosion (Xiao et al., 2016). Alternatively, adsorption over solid substrates has attracted greater attention (Hosseini et al., 2015;Heo et al., 2019). Of the various adsorbent development approaches, introducing amine functional groups into porous substrates is an effective strategy for the development of highly selective solid CO 2 adsorbents with high adsorption capacity. Even though solid-amine based adsorbents also suffer from high energy demand during the regeneration process (Hicks et al., 2008), using a non-aqueous process for the adsorption and desorption is one of their advantages over liquid amine absorption.
Porous substrates of polymeric microfibers offer several advantages over other materials. This is due to its excellent flexibility, easy regeneration, humidity-aided adsorption, lowpressure loss, and suitability for low-temperature applications (Zhuang et al., 2013). Nevertheless, these adsorbents suffer from low adsorption capacity owing to the lack of high access to amine functional groups. One possible approach to improve work capacity and efficiency of microfibrous adsorbents is to increase the surface area of the fibers by moving from micro-to nano-scaled substrates such as carbon and polymer nanofibers.
Nanofibers are one-dimensional structures with threedimensional (3D) morphology offering several advantages: namely, porous interconnected architecture, high surface area, and the ability to control their functionality and morphology. Since adsorption happens on the surface of materials, increasing the surface to volume ratio results in better access to carbon dioxide molecules to amine functional groups, leading to higher adsorption efficiency. Moreover, the porous interconnected structure of the nanofibrous mats could potentially decrease the pressure drop during the adsorption, leading to lower energy requirements for the process. Furthermore, for nanoscale fibers, there is another factor affecting adsorption efficiency and pressure drop called slip flow. The ratio of gas mean free path to the fiber radius is called Knudsen number. When Knudsen number becomes non-negligible, the continuous flow theory, which does not reckon the molecular nature of air, begins to fail. In this case, the speed of air molecules at the surface of fibers is not zero, and slip flow prevails. As a result, the drag force on the fiber surface and, therefore, pressure drop decreases (Graham et al., 2002). Different techniques have been used to produce nanofibers, such as phase separation (Van De Witte et al., 1996) and template synthesis (Chakarvarti and Vetter, 1998). Electrospinning is the most versatile and commonly nanofibers producing method . Due to their unique properties, nanofibers have become favorable alternative substrates for CO 2 adsorbents development.
In many studies, electrospun carbon nanofibers were tested as CO 2 adsorbent (Hong et al., 2014;Iqbal et al., 2017;Kim et al., 2017). On the other hand, polymeric nanofibers were subjected to a limited number of investigations for such application. As a promising material for adsorption applications, nanofibers are usually modified using different methods to introduce the requisite functionality and properties. Dip-coating, interfacial polymerization and radiation-induced grafting (RIG) are standard techniques used in this regard. Interestingly, RIG is very promising because of its ability to permanently modify chemical and physical characteristics of various forms of polymeric substrates (films, particles, or fibers) without having a significant impact on their inherent properties (Abbasi et al., 2018).
It is worth noting that electrospun nanofibers of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) were used as a substrate for hosting Cubased metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Such MOFs, which are known for their high surface area, high adsorption, and storage capacity for CO 2 gas, boosted adsorbent performance. In another study, polyamide-6/amine-functionalized CNT composite nanofibers were impregnated with polyethyleneimine (PEI) to enhance CO 2 adsorption capacity and selectivity. As a result, maximum adsorption capacity of 1.16 mmol CO 2 /g-adsorbent was achieved, which is comparable with other polymer-based CO 2 adsorbents (Zainab et al., 2017). PAN nanofibers were also functionalized with different amines and tested for efficient transport of humid CO 2 . Thus, CO 2 capture capacity of the amine-containing PAN nanofibers increased due to the change in the chemical and morphological structure of the fibers (Olivieri et al., 2018).
In a previous study, a combination of electrospinning of syndiotactic polypropylene (s-PP) followed by RIG by glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and chemical modification using ethanolamine (EA) was used to develop a new CO 2 adsorbent. The adsorbent showed an impressive CO 2 capture performance (Abbasi et al., 2019). However, the presence of poly-GMA in the grafted nanofibers with its epoxy group, which allows the introduction of different amine groups that may have a substantial impact on the performance of the adsorbent, has not been explored so far. The objective of this study is therefore to comparatively investigate the effect of functionalization of poly-GMA grafted s-PP nanofibrous sheets using different amines including ethanolamine (EA), diethylamine (DEA) and triethylamine (TEA) on CO 2 adsorption capacity under different fixed-bed column parameters. The study also involves a thorough investigation of the effects of amination parameters such as amine concentration, reaction time, temperature, and degree of grafting (DG) on the degree of amination (DA).
Combining electrospinning with RIG provides a versatile approach for synthesizing a new group of materials with several benefits. High surface area, the capability to introduce various functional groups, controlling the porosity of the material, and adjusting the density of introduced functional groups are some of the advantages offered by this approach. It leads to the synthesis of various materials with diverse applications such as ion exchange membranes (Abouzari-Lotf et al., 2017). For CO 2 adsorption, it could be translated to the ability to tune the material to be suitable for various flow rates, different CO 2 concentrations in the feed, presence of various impurities, and different temperatures. The adsorbed CO 2 could be used in various applications, such as replacing hazardous starting materials for the synthesis of chemicals, e.g., replacing isocyanates and phosgene in the synthesis of carbamate-type fungicides (Aresta and Quaranta, 1997). It is worth noting that this is a fundamental study, and more investigation is required on scale-up capability, cost analysis, and deep engineering before the technique could be adopted for industrial application.

Preparation of Adsorbents
Electrospinning of s-PP Nanofibers s-PP nanofibers with a specific surface area of more than 2.0 m 2 /g were electrospun via 7.5 wt/v% solution of polymer in a solvent containing a mixture of decalin, acetone and DMF with a weight ratio of 80:10:10 under optimum conditions, as reported in a previous communication (Abbasi et al., 2018(Abbasi et al., , 2019. The obtained nanofibers were dried at 60 • C for 24 h to remove the residual solvents.

Grafting of GMA Onto s-PP Nanofibers
GMA was grafted onto s-PP nanofibers using a pre-irradiation technique. Thus, some nanofibrous sheets (4 × 4) cm were placed in vacuum-sealed polyethylene bags and irradiated on dry ice using a universal electron beam accelerator (NHV-Nissin High Voltage, EPS3000, Cockroft Walton type, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 1 MeV and a beam current of 10 mA to a total dose in the range of 40-200 kGy. The irradiated samples were kept inside a low-temperature freezer at −40 • C and used for grafting reactions within 3 days. The degree of grafting (DG) representing the amount of poly(GMA) grafted in s-PP substrates was varied by changing the grafting parameters such as monomer concentration, temperature, and time. Details of the effect of grafting parameters on DG have been reported elsewhere (Abbasi et al., 2018).

Amination of Poly(GMA)-Grafted Nanofibers
Three amination agents, including EA (primary amine), DEA (secondary amine) and TEA (tertiary amine) were used to functionalize the poly(GMA) grafted s-PP nanofibrous samples using 3 different reactions. The amination reaction proceeded by the opening of the epoxy rings as presented in the grafted poly(GMA) side chains. The reaction was carried out by immersing a sample of poly(GMA) grafted s-PP nanofibrous sheets of known weight in a solution of amination agent diluted in water to concentrations in the range of 20-100% (v/v) for EA and DEA and a volume ratio of 50:50 (v/v) for TEA. The solution was stirred at temperatures in the range of 25-70 • C under reflux condition for the amination using EA and DEA. It was noted that performing the amination reaction using TEA at higher temperatures made the samples very brittle and very difficult to handle in adsorption experiments. So, the reaction was carried out at 30 • C within a longer time in order that the reaction be fully completed. The reaction continued until the degree of amination (DA) reached a plateau. Then, the samples were extracted, rinsed with DI water several times to remove all un-reacted amines and dried at 60 • C in a vacuum oven for 12 h. Finally, the samples were weighed. DA was calculated according to Equation (1) (Choi et al., 1999): where W 0 , W g , and W a are the weights of the samples before grafting, after grafting and after amination, respectively. M wa is the molecular weight of the amination agent, and the molecular weight of GMA is 142.15. Furthermore, amine density is defined as the moles of the amine functional groups per gram of the adsorbent and is determined as in Equation (2):

CO 2 Adsorption Tests
A fixed bed adsorption column fabricated by Solutions Sdn Bhd, Malaysia, was used to test the CO 2 adsorption capacity of the prepared samples under dynamic condition. A stainless-steel column with a height of 330 mm and an internal diameter of 250 mm was equipped with a porous plate located at a height of 30 mm, as a sample holder. Temperature control was carried out using a heating element coiled around the column and two K-type thermocouples, with an accuracy of ±1.5 • C located at a height of 75 and 280 mm from the column base. A gas mixture of CO 2 /N 2 with a total flow rate of 50 ml/min with different CO 2 concentrations was used for adsorption experiments at atmospheric pressure. The flow of CO 2 and N 2 gasses was accurately controlled by two mass flow controllers (GFC series, Dwyer Instruments, USA) in the range of 1-50 and 1-100 ml/min, respectively. An online CO 2 analyzer (GfG Gesellschaft für Gerätebau IR 24) with a maximum detection limit of 50 vol% was used to monitor CO 2 concentration before and after adsorption. Nitrogen gas was humidified via a water bubbler at 60 • C and then mixed with CO 2 . The relative humidity of the gas stream was about 80% as determined by Fisher-Scientific lab hygrometer.
The calculation of the dynamic adsorption capacity (q) of the samples was carried out as in Equation (3) (Serna-Guerrero and Sayari, 2010): where F is total flow rate (mmol/s), C 0 is the initial concentration of CO 2 , W is the weight of the adsorbent (g), and t q is the stoichiometric time (s), calculated using the breakthrough curve according to Equation (4) (Serna-Guerrero and Sayari, 2010).
where C and C 0 are CO 2 concentrations at the inlet and the outlet gas streams, respectively. The ratio of the moles of CO 2 adsorbed on the material to the moles of nitrogen available on the sample is defined as amine efficiency. Amine type and presence or absence of water molecules determine the maximum amine efficiency of an adsorbent. Maximum amine efficiency of all types of amines (primary, secondary, and tertiary) in humid conditions used in these experiments is 1. Amine efficiency was calculated according to Equation (5): Amine efficiency (%) = q amine density × 100 (5) where amine density is the moles of the amine functional groups per gram of the adsorbent and q is the adsorption capacity. Furthermore, the influence of initial CO 2 concentration, temperature and degree of grafting/amination on the adsorption capacity of the samples was investigated. Initial CO 2 concentration, temperature and DG were changed in the range of 5-15%, 30-50 • C, and 150-400%, respectively.

Characterization of Adsorbents
A scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi S3400N, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 10 kV and a magnification of 1000-5000 x was used to study the morphology of the samples after being coated with gold. To estimate the average fiber diameter of nanofibers, the diameters of 30 random fibers of each sample were measured and used. The changes in the chemical composition of the samples were investigated using a Nexus 670 Thermo Nicolet FTIR in the frequency range of 4,000-400 cm −1 with a resolution of 4 cm −1 and five-time scans.
The thermal properties such as melting temperature of the samples were investigated using a differential scanning calorimetry (DSC: Q200 TA Instrument, USA) under nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate: 50 mL min −1 ) in the heating range of 30-300 • C at a heating rate of 10 • C min −1 . The thermal stability of the samples was monitored by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on a Mettler Toledo TGA/SDTA 851e unit in a temperature range of 30-600 • C at a heating rate of 10 • C min −1 .

Preparation of Nanofibers and Their Modification by RIG
The synthesis of s-PP nanofibrous sheets was carried out. Further, independent parameters of the electrospinning process including applied voltage, needle tip to collector distance (TCD) and flow rate were varied based on the combinations offered by Box-Behnken design (BBD) of RSM, as reported previously (Abbasi et al., 2018). Nanofibers with an average fiber diameter of 439 nm were obtained and used for grafting and amination due to their proper production rate and excellent fiber quality.
After being irradiated with an electron beam under different grafting parameters, the s-PP nanofibrous sheets were grafted with GMA. The effect of four main parameters, such as monomer concentration, absorbed dose, grafting time, and temperature on the DG was studied. Results showed a high dependency of the DG on reaction parameters, as reported elsewhere (Abbasi et al., 2018), and samples with DG in the range of 150-400% were obtained.

Amination Parameters
In this study, three different amines, including EA, DEA and TEA, were used for amination reactions. The effect of reaction parameters such as DG, amine concentration and reaction temperature on the degree of amination (DA) was studied.
The influence of reaction time on the degree of amination (DA) for samples with different DGs (150, 300, and 400%) using EA, DEA, and TEA is shown in Figures 1A-C where treatments with EA and DEA were performed under constant temperature and amine concentration of 60 • C and 60 vol% in water, respectively. However, for TEA, a volume ratio of 50:50 (v/v) at 30 • C was used. As for amination with EA ( Figure 1A), the DA increased sharply, in the first 30 min, for all samples with various DGs, showing a fast reaction rate in the initial stage of the amination. This was followed by a very slight increase that continued up to 120 min beyond which it reached a plateau. The maximum DA achieved for the sample with the DG of 150% was 98% whereas samples with DGs of 300 and 400% reached 94 and 90%, respectively.
A similar trend was observed for amination using DEA. As can be seen in Figure 1B, the increase in reaction time led to an increase in DA for the three samples with various DGs. For the sample with 150% DG, DA sharply increased from 20% after 5 min to 98% after 60 min in an almost linear trend, indicating a high reaction rate at this stage. Subsequently, as time went by, DA reached a plateau. For samples with 300 and 400% DGs, a sharp linear increase in DA was observed as time increased from 5 to 30 min, reaching values of 65 and 58%, respectively. This was followed by a slight increase in DA up to 120 min beyond which a plateau was reached at 93% for DG of 300 and 86% for DG of 400%. The decrease in DA observed during the amination with EA and DEA at higher DGs was mostly caused by the decrease in sample porosity by the increase in grafting density, as revealed by SEM images. Thus, diffusion of the amination solution slowed down and hampered access to epoxy groups, leading to lower DA.
BET analysis showed that with increasing the degree of grafting from 150 to 300%, the total pore volume of the samples decreased from 0.009 to 0.006 cm 3 /g. However, it is worth noting that these very low values are related to intra-fiber pores, revealing an almost solid, non-porous structure of single fibers. Inter-fiber porosity which is the main type of porosity for these samples are formed through overlapping fibers (Abbasi et al., 2018). Therefore, with increasing the fiber size, and bead size and number, this type of porosity is decreased.
As for the amination reaction using TEA, which was carried out at 30 • C to avoid a drastic change in its mechanical characteristics, reaction rate was much lower compared to that of EA and DEA. During the initial 10 h of the reaction, Figure 1C showed a significant increase in DA from about 8-70% for all grafted samples with various DGs. Then, a slight increase in DA followed up to 16 h beyond which it reached a plateau. At about 80%, DA remained constant. The trend was the same for all the samples with various DGs. Figure 1 reveals that kinetics of the amination reaction using various amines was in the order of primary>secondary>tertiary. It could be attributed to the spatial hindrance of various amines having a different number of alkyl groups around the nitrogen atom. With increasing the number of alkyl groups covalently bound to the nitrogen atom in the molecular structure of the amines, the number of efficient collisions with epoxy rings decreases, leading to lower reaction kinetics. Figure 2 displays the effect of temperature (Figure 2A) and amine concentration (Figure 2B) on the DA using EA and DEA. Regarding EA, the increase in temperature from 30 to 50 • C led to an increase in DA from 76 to 95% beyond which it reached a plateau. Further increase in the temperature did not significantly affect the DA. Hence, optimal temperature for amination reaction was maintained at 50 • C. A similar trend was observed for amination using DEA, showing an increase in DA from 15% at 25 • C to 98% at 70 • C. All reactions were carried out for 60 min using 50 vol% amine concentration in water. Increasing the reaction temperature not only enhanced the diffusion of the amine solution into the nanofibrous sheet but also provoked the ring opening reaction of the epoxy group of Poly-GMA grafted chains (Zhuang et al., 2013). Furthermore, the higher DA observed for amination using EA at lower temperatures was an indication of lower activation energy for EA amination reaction compared to that of DEA.
It was noted that increasing EA concentration from 20 to 100% in water resulted in a sharp rise in DA from 35 to 98%. This was attributed to improved frequency of efficient collisions between amine molecules and epoxy groups due to increased concentration of the loaded amine groups. On the other hand, a different trend was observed for amination with DEA. For instance, an increase in DEA concentration from 20 to 50% led to an increase in DA from 50 to 98%. However, a further increase in DEA concentration triggered a decrease in DA, reaching to 30% for 100% pure amine. This could be ascribed to the decrease in the diffusion of highly concentrated amine solutions into the nanofibrous sheets, leading to lower DA for higher concentrations. Thereafter, the reactions were carried out using 50% amine concentration. Thus, considering the high DA achieved in most of the samples at 70 • C, it can be reasonable to assume that 100% amination had been achieved.

Morphological Properties
Morphological changes of pristine electrospun s-PP nanofibers during grafting with GMA and then amination using EA has already been discussed (Abbasi et al., 2018(Abbasi et al., , 2019. In Figure 3, the effect of amination reaction using DEA on the grafted s-PP nanofibers can be seen. After amination, the average fiber diameter increased from 500 nm for the 300% grafted sample to 568, 622, and 686 nm for the samples with DA of 30, 85, and 93%, respectively. Formation of a layer of amine groups wrapping around the grafted nanofibers could be the reason for this diameter increase (Zhuang et al., 2013). Besides, when DA increased, the number and size of the beads increased so that for the DA of 93%, mostly beads mixed with some fibers were observed.
In Figure 4, SEM images of 300% grafted s-PP nanofibers, before and after amination using TEA with DA of 22% (B), 50% (C), and 82% (D), can be seen. Again, when DA increased,  fiber diameter increased from 500 nm for a grafted sample to 608, 644, and 742 nm for 22, 50, and 82% DA, respectively. The increase in size can be ascribed to the sheathing effect of amine groups on the grafted samples (Zhuang et al., 2013). Furthermore, when DA increased, the majority of the fibers in the structure became swollen and made bead-like moieties in the fibers. These morphological and size changes in the poly(GMA) grafted s-PP nanofibers confirm the successful immobilization of the three various types of amine-containing groups in the obtained three adsorbents.
The specific surface area for defect-free nanofibrous mats with an average fiber diameter of around 500 nm was reported to be ∼5 m 2 /g (Schreuder-Gibson et al., 2002). For the s-PP nanofibers prepared in this study, the surface area was around 2 m 2 /g, which could be attributed to the presence of irregularities and large beads formed during electrospinning process. Even though the obtained specific surface area is higher than that of commercial non-woven microfibers in size range of 5-20 µm (between 0.1 and 0.5 m 2 /g) (Schreuder-Gibson et al., 2002), which was the main point of using nanofibers instead of microfibers, presence of beads and non-continuous fibers in the prepared samples leads to decreased surface area in comparison with the ideal fibers, potentially decreasing the adsorption capacity and efficiency. However, it has been shown that the presence of beads on the nanofibrous structure leads to a lower pressure drop in air filtration applications. These microbeads act like a spacer and by changing the internal structure of nanofibrous mat and increasing the distance between fibers, modify the fiber packing density, leading to lower pressure drop (Yun et al., 2010;Wang et al., 2015). Therefore, even though the formation of beads on electrospun nanofibers was unavoidable due to the low solubility of PP in the used solvent mixture, it could potentially be beneficial from the viewpoint of pressure drop in CO 2 adsorption.

Chemical Composition
As can be seen in Figure 5, successful grafting and amination reactions using three various amines of EA, DEA, and TEA was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. After grafting, new absorption bands appeared at 1,725, 1,255, 905, and 845 cm −1 . The strong band at 1,725 cm −1 and the weak broad band at 1,255 cm −1 are attributed to -C=O and C-O-stretching of acrylate, respectively (Choi et al., 2001). The two small peaks at 905 and 845 cm −1 are characteristic bands of the epoxy ring (Bondar et al., 2004;Zhuang et al., 2013;Mahmoud Nasef et al., 2014). It was observed that there was no significant change in the position and intensity of the carbonyl band of poly(GMA) at 1,725 cm −1 during the amination reaction with EA, DEA, and TEA (Insert in Figure 5). On the other hand, the characteristic bands of the epoxy ring at 905 and 845 cm −1 almost disappeared during the amination reactions. Besides, a new broad band, attributed to the O-H stretch, appeared at 3,500-3,000 cm −1 , which was due to the addition of hydroxyl group to the structure. Aliphatic amines also showed a C-N stretching vibration at 1,250-1,020 cm −1 . Nevertheless, several characteristic peaks of the s-PP made this area highly crowded leading to the obscuring of the C-N peak. These results further validated the effective amination of the grafted samples through opening the epoxy rings of the grafted poly(GMA).

Thermal Properties
In Figure 6, DSC thermograms of pristine, poly(GMA)-grafted and aminated nanofibers using various amines can be seen. The melting point of pristine s-PP appeared at about 124 • C as an endothermic peak. As for the grafted nanofibers, this peak was very weak. The graph showed an additional broad peak at 227 • C which can be attributed to the first stage decomposition of poly(GMA) side chains. Regarding all the aminated samples, a small peak was observed between 120 and 130 • C which was ascribed to the moisture adsorbed onto the aminated films, showing the hydrophilicity of the samples (Choi et al., 2001). Figure 7 depicts TGA thermograms of pristine, GMA-grafted and EA-, DEA-, and TEA-aminated s-PP nanofibers. As for pristine s-PP, a single step degradation was observed at 461 • C due to the main polymeric backbone thermal decomposition. The GMA-grafted sample showed three-stage decomposition behavior. Degradation of glycidyl and carboxyl groups of GMA side chains appeared at 228 and 313 • C, respectively (Choi et al., 2015). Like the pristine nanofibers, the final decomposition stage at 455 • C was for the thermal decomposition of the main s-PP backbone.
As for EA-aminated samples, a three-stage decomposition pattern was observed. The first weight loss was because of the moisture adsorbed on the aminated samples, showing the hydrophilic nature of the sheets after amination (Choi et al., 2015). Again, the decomposition peak of GMA side chains disappeared which confirmed the successful amination reaction. Further, the carboxyl decomposition peak shifted to 333 • C, and a new peak attributed to the degradation of aminated species appeared at 417 • C. The decomposition peak of polymeric backbone also appeared at 465 • C. Thus, the thermal stability of GMA-grafted samples improved after amination with EA. This can be explained by the opening of unstable epoxy rings, leading to the removal of the stress of three-membered epoxy ring. As a result, the thermal stability of the sample improved.
After amination of poly(GMA)-grafted samples with DEA, a new peak appeared at around 434 • C. This was attributed to the degradation of the aminated species. Further, the degradation peak of GMA side chains disappeared, and the peak related to the carboxyl group shifted to 291 • C. The decomposition peak of polymeric backbone was observed at 460 • C. Like the EAaminated sample, the first weight loss was for the removal of absorbed moisture from the adsorbent. Here as well, the thermal stability of the sample improved after amination with DEA due to the ring-opening reaction on unstable epoxy rings.
Like the other two aminated samples, the first weight loss of TEA-aminated adsorbent was due to adsorbed moisture. Furthermore, the thermogram showed a new amine-moiety related decomposition peak at 417 • C which merged with the decomposition peak of the main s-PP backbone. Since the amination reaction yield was only 82%, some of the epoxy rings were left in the structure. Hence, the related decomposition peak shifted to a lower temperature of 210 • C. This shift could be due to the spatial hindrance of big TMA molecules, making epoxy rings even more unstable. As a result, the TEA aminated samples showed lower thermal stability compared to the EA-and DEAaminated adsorbents, as well as the GMA-grafted sample.  CO 2 Adsorption Figure 8 shows CO 2 adsorption breakthrough curves for s-PP nanofibers grafted by GMA and aminated using EA, DEA, and TEA. Temperature, degree of grafting of the samples and feed concentration was changed in the range of 30-50 • C, 150-400, and 5-15% to study their effect on adsorption capacity. In Table 1, the results of CO 2 adsorption tests are summarized for all nanofibrous s-PP adsorbents grafted by poly(GMA) and aminated using three various amines.
As for the EA-aminated adsorbents, when adsorption temperature increased from 30 to 40 and 50 • C, the breakthrough curve shifted to shorter times and the adsorption capacity decreased from 2.57 to 1.67, and 1.04 mmol CO 2 /g of the adsorbent, respectively. A similar trend was observed for DEAand TEA-aminated adsorbents. The adsorption capacity of the DEA-aminated sample decreased from 1.78 for 30 • C to 1.49 and 1.18 mmol CO 2 /g of the adsorbent for 40 and 50 • C, respectively. Again, the TEA-aminated adsorbent showed a decrease in its adsorption capacity from 0.8 to 0.68 and 0.42 for 30 to 40 and 50 • C, respectively. For all three types of the synthesized adsorbents, the entropy change and the heat of adsorption proved negative for CO 2 adsorption. Hence, it is evident that when the temperature increased, adsorption capacity decreased (Drese, 2010).
Three samples with various DGs of 150, 300, and 400% with maximum DA obtained for each sample was used to investigate the influence of DG/DA combination (determining amine density) on the CO 2 adsorption capacity of various synthesized adsorbents. The increase in DG led to a rise in the number of epoxy rings on the sample for the amination reaction. As a result, it was expected to have higher amine density for higher DG and therefore, higher adsorption capacity. On the other hand, when DG increased, the highest DA that was obtained for the sample decreased.
When DG increased for the EA-aminated adsorbents in the order of 150, 300 and 400%, the highest DA that was determined dropped from 98 to 94 and 90%, respectively. Thus, for the samples with DGs of 150, 300 and 400%, amine density rose in the order of 3.30, 3.81, and 3.87 mmol/g respectively. Besides, amine efficiency for the EA-aminated samples with DG of 150, 300, and 400% was found to be 68.5, 67.5, and 59%, respectively. Essentially, a combination of amine density and amine efficiency of an adsorbent determines its adsorption capacity. Consequently, the highest adsorption capacity (q) of 2.57 mmol CO 2 /g of the adsorbent was obtained for EA-aminated samples having DG of 300%. For the samples with DG of 150 and 400%, the adsorption capacity proved to be 2.26 and 2.28 mmol CO 2 /g of the adsorbent, respectively.
The EA-aminated sample with DG of 300% had about 15% higher amine density compared with the sample having DG of 150%. This led to 14% higher adsorption capacity which produced almost the same amine efficiency for the two samples. On the other hand, although the amine density of the sample with DG of 400% was a little bit higher than that of the sample with DG of 300%, both adsorption capacity and amine efficiency were seen to be lower. This demonstrated, therefore, high pore blockage of the adsorbent and less access of CO 2 molecules to amine groups.
As for DEA-aminated adsorbents, when DG increased from 150 to 300 and 400%, the highest DA decreased from 98 to 93 and 86%, respectively. As a result, the amine density of the sample with DG of 300% (3.61 mmol/g) was higher than that of the samples with DG of 150% (2.18 mmol/g) and 400% (3.57 mmol/g). On the other hand, amine efficiency for DEA-aminated samples was 50.6, 49.3, and 42.5% for 150, 300, and 400% DG, respectively. The combination of amine density and amine efficiency revealed the adsorption capacity for these samples to be 1.61, 1.78, and 1.52 mmol CO 2 per gram of adsorbent, respectively. As can be seen, the highest adsorption capacity was for the sample with 300% DG, followed by 150 and 400%. Even though the amine density of the sample with DG of 400% was higher than that of the sample with DG of 150%, because of pore blockage and less accessibility of amine functional groups to CO 2 molecules, its adsorption capacity was lower. When DG increased from 150 to 300% for the TEA-aminated samples, the highest DA decreased only by 2% from 84 to 82%. In this regard, there was no difference between the samples with the DG of 300 and 400%. As a result, the amine density of the samples increased when DG increased, reaching to 2.61, 3.01, and 3.14 mmol/g for 150, 300, and 400%, respectively. However, TEA-aminated samples showed amine efficiencies of 28.9, 26.6, and 26.8% for 150, 300, and 400% DG, respectively. The combination of both amine density and efficiency resulted in adsorption capacities of 0.75, 0.80, and 0.84 mmol CO 2 per gram of adsorbent, respectively. Thus, it can be observed that DG did not have a strong influence on adsorption capacity of the TEAaminated samples. Although the amine density of the samples with higher DGs were higher, the decrease in amine efficiency due to pore blockage and less accessibility of CO 2 molecules to amine functional groups compensated for the higher amine density; almost similar adsorption capacities were achieved for all three adsorbents. Figure 8C shows the effect of feed concentration on the breakthrough curves of CO 2 adsorption. Consequently, when feed concentration increased, breakthrough point was reached in a shorter time and the curve shifted to the left. As for higher concentrations, shorter times were required to reach equilibrium point, and the adsorption kinetics was faster. Furthermore, adsorption capacity and amine efficiency also changed when feed concentration was modified.
As for EA-aminated adsorbents, when feed concentration increased from 5 to 15%, amine efficiency also increased from 49.8 to 75.3%. A similar rise in adsorption capacity from 1.90 to 2.87 mmol CO 2 /g of the adsorbent was observed. As for the DEA-aminated samples, amine efficiency and adsorption capacity increased from 41.3 to 57.1% and from 1.49 to 2.06 mmol CO 2 /g adsorbent, respectively, when feed concentration increased in the range of 5-15%. The TEA aminated samples also showed a comparable trend. When feed concentration increased from 5 to 15%, amine efficiency and adsorption capacity also increased from 20.4 to 31.1% and from 0.61 to 0.94 mmol CO 2 /g adsorbent, respectively. The highest adsorption capacities for the EA-, DEA-and TEAaminated samples were 2.87, 2.06, and 0.94 mmol/g, obtained for the adsorbents with DG of 300%, CO 2 concentration of 15%, and DA of 94, 93, and 82%, respectively. Further, the highest amine efficiency for EA-, DEA-, and TEA-aminated samples were 75, 57, and 31% respectively. Therefore, high adsorption capacities are expected for these adsorbents. However, their capacities are considered to be moderate mostly due to the high weight percentage of s-PP base polymer which does not participate in the adsorption process.
When the CO 2 adsorption capacity of EA-, DEA-, and TEAcontaining samples is compared, it was observed that capacity decreased in the order of primary>secondary> tertiary amines. This effect has already been reported in previous studies (Ko et al., 2011) showing the effect of amine chemical structure on its ability to attach to CO 2 molecules. A primary amine is attached to only one alkyl group and two hydrogen atoms. Since the molecule is smaller, the spatial hindrance is minimum for attaching to CO 2 molecules. Secondary and tertiary amines are attached to two and three alkyl groups, respectively. So, the size of various types of amines increases according to amine type and the number of alkyl groups attached to the nitrogen atom. This increase in size results in higher spatial hindrance and less chance of CO 2 molecules getting close to the nitrogen atom to form a covalent bonding. As a result, primary amines have higher affinity to CO 2 molecules as well as higher adsorption capacity. Secondary and tertiary amines are ranked second and third.

Regeneration
For real world applications, regeneration performance is one of the crucial characteristics of an adsorbent. In Figure 9, breakthrough curves (a) and CO 2 adsorption capacities (b) on fresh and regenerated EA-, DEA-, and TEA-aminated samples at each regeneration cycle can be seen. Hence, all types of adsorbents show high stability against regeneration process. Consequently, after four regeneration cycles, the adsorption capacity of the EA-aminated samples decreased from 2.57 to 2.35 mmol/g, showing an 8% decrease in capacity. Most of this decrease happened during the first and second regeneration cycles, after which the capacity remained almost constant.
For the adsorbents containing DEA, excellent stability was observed. After four cycles of regeneration, a 13% drop in adsorption capacity happened. Thus, capacity decreased from 1.78 to 1.55 mmol/g. The stability of the DEA containing adsorbent was less than that of the EA and TEA containing samples. The TEA aminated samples demonstrated excellent regeneration performance. Even after four cycles of regeneration, the adsorption capacity practically did not change and remained at around 0.80 mmol/g. This indicated very high stability of the samples containing TEA against thermal treatment during the regeneration process. FTIR spectroscopy on the amine-bearing adsorbents after 4 cycles of regeneration showed no considerable change in their chemical structure, confirming their stability during the regeneration process.
It is worth noting that the regeneration process was performed at 80 • C for 15 min, which is considered as low temperature and short time compared to the regeneration process of other amine-bearing CO 2 adsorbents. For example, regeneration temperature/time of some of the adsorbents reported in the literature was: 105 • C/40 min for PEI-containing polyamide-6 (Zainab et al., 2017), 130 • C/180 min for Aziridine grafted SBA-15 (Hicks et al., 2008), 120 • C/30 min for PEI-modified glass microfibers (Li et al., 2008) and benzyl amine-bearing ion exchange resin (Alesi and Kitchin, 2012), 90 • C/60 min for amine-based Nano-fibrillated cellulose (Gebald et al., 2011), and 100 • C/20 min for triethylenetetramine-bearing polypropylene microfibers (Zhuang et al., 2013). It decreases energy and time requirements for the regeneration process, making the new materials more viable for industrial applications.

CONCLUSION
A series of amine-bearing electrospun s-PP nanofibrous CO 2 adsorbents were successfully synthesized using a versatile 3stage procedure: namely, electrospinning of s-PP to prepare pristine nanofibers, RIG of GMA onto electrospun nanofibers and amination of grafted nanofibers using EA, DEA and TEA aminating agents to introduce required amine functional groups for CO 2 adsorption. Nanofibrous sheets with an average fiber diameter of 439 nm were obtained and grafted with poly(GMA) to DGs in the range of 150-400% by manipulating grafting parameters. The DA from different amines was found to be dependent on parameters such as DG, temperature, time and amine concentration. Interestingly, when DG increased, DA decreased despite having more poly(GMA) grafts. This trend was attributed to higher pore blockage limiting the access of amination agents to epoxy rings of grafted poly(GMA). The highest DA for EA-, DEA-, and TEA-aminated samples was 98, 98, and 84%, respectively. The CO 2 adsorption capacity of the adsorbents was studied in a fixed bed column under various parameters, including adsorption temperature, amine density and initial CO 2 concentration. Results revealed an increasing order of primary>secondary> tertiary amines. Thus, it was noted that EA-, DEA-and TEA-aminated adsorbents showed CO 2 adsorption capacity values of 2.87, 2.06, and 0.94 mmol/g, respectively. Moreover, the highest capacity was obtained for the samples with DG of 300% in all three types of adsorbents at an initial CO 2 concentration of 15% at 30 • C. The amine efficiency of EA-, DEA-, and TEAaminated adsorbents was found to be 75, 57, and 31%, respectively, showing very high efficiency for the amine functional groups. All types of adsorbents demonstrated high stability during the four cycles of the regeneration process at 80 • C, with the lowest capacity loss of 2.5% being for the TEA-aminated sample, followed by 8 and 13% for EA and DEA aminated adsorbents, respectively. The results of this study showed that radiation grafted and aminated polymeric nanofibrous sheets had strong potential to be used as efficient CO 2 adsorbents.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/supplementary material.