Physical Design of High-Performance Fuel Assembly Based on Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuel for Supercritical CO2 Cooled Reactor

Introduction

By taking advantage of the appropriate critical pressure, high density, stability, and sluggishness of CO₂ near its critical point, the use of supercritical CO₂(S-CO₂) as a coolant in the direct cycle reactor is evaluated (Ahn et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2020). The S-CO₂–cooled reactor, as a promising innovative reactor, has the advantages of simple system, high thermal efficiency, small volume, and light weight, and it represents an important development direction for nuclear energy innovation and development (Michael, 2004).

Safety and economics are the main objectives of the S-CO₂–cooled reactor. A new fuel concept is referred to as accident-tolerant fuels (ATFs) are capable of mitigating the potential consequences of beyond-design-basis accidents (Bragg-Sitton, 2014). The fully ceramic microencapsulated (FCM) fuel (Terrani et al., 2012) has become one among the ATF options which is based on tristructural isotropic (TRISO) (Bragg-Sitton and Carmack, 2015)–coated particles embedded in silicon carbide (SiC) matrix. FCM fuel borrows from the TRISO particle design from the high-temperature gas reactor (HTGR) technology but uses SiC as a matrix material rather than graphite in HTGR. Benefiting from the multiple barriers of TRISO and SiC matrix, FCM fuel has extremely high radioactivity retention capability compared to that of the conventional standard UO₂ fuel. By the advantages of safety, a new fuel assembly based on the FCM fuel is proposed for the S-CO₂–cooled reactor in this study.

In further research, although the FCM fuel contains moderation materials such as SiC, the assembly cannot be sufficiently moderated due to the weak moderating performance of S-CO₂, which affects the neutronics economy seriously. The study on improving the deficiency of weak moderating performance is described in this article.

Unlike the light water moderated or heavy water moderated (Zhang et al.,2019; Zhang et al.,2020) nuclear reactors, the S-CO₂ cooled reactor needs specific moderator rods to improve the slow-down of neutrons. The introduction of moderator rods can effectively improve the moderating performance of S-CO₂–cooled reactor, but it will lead to the deterioration of uniform moderation. To further improve the uniform moderation, moderator rod arrangement and fuel enrichment partition method are studied. Finally, this study shows clearly that a better balance between uniform moderation and sufficient moderation can be obtained in the high-performance S-CO₂–cooled reactor assembly.

Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuel Assembly of S-CO₂–Cooled Reactor Design

Standard Fuel Assembly of S-CO₂–Cooled Reactor Design

An FCM fuel with a TRISO particle is shown in Figure 1. The TRISO particle geometry and composition are given in Table 1 and the FCM fuel design parameters are given in Table 2. In this design, the TRISO particles account for 40% of the volume in FCM fuel and the enrichment of ²³⁵U reaches 19.75%.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Design of FCM fuel.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. TRISO particle geometry and composition.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. FCM fuel design parameters.

The standard fuel assembly of S-CO₂–cooled reactor in this study is shown in Figure 2; it contains SiC block, fuel holes, coolant holes, and lumped burnable poison (or control rods) hole. The assembly design parameters are given in Table 3. Each block is a right hexagonal prism with a dimension of 2,500 mm in length and 240 mm across the flats of the hexagonal cross section. Fuel and coolant holes run parallel through the length of the block in a regular triangular pattern of nominally two fuel holes per coolant hole. The pitch of the fuel and coolant hole array is 18 mm. The minimum web thickness between the fuel hold and coolant hole is 6 mm and this web provides an additional barrier to the release of metallic fission products. In order to get an effective control of reactivity, a lumped burnable poison (or control rods) hole (72 mm) is added to the center of standard fuel assembly.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. S-CO₂–cooled reactor standard fuel assembly.

TABLE 3

TABLE 3. FCM fuel design parameters.

Neutron Moderating Performance Analysis for the Standard Assembly

To analyze neutron moderating performance for the standard assembly, the light water (H₂O) coolant fuel assembly is used for comparison in standard assembly cooling by S-CO₂. Other than replacing coolant with H₂O, the design parameters remain unchanged to compare S-CO₂ assembly and H₂O assembly in moderating analyses. The calculation in the study is done by using HANDF-E code package developed by the Nuclear Power Institute of China. This code has been used in the analysis of hexagonal assembly because of its high accuracy.

Infinite multiplication factor ($K_{\infty }$) is the main parameter that characterizes fuel reactivity. In general, moderating performance largely determines the value of $K_{\infty }$. $K_{\infty }$of each assembles as fuel burn up varies, as shown in Figure 3. $K_{\infty }$of S-CO₂ assembly is much less than that of H₂O under the same fuel burn up. The calculation results clearly show that S-CO₂ assembly has the defect of insufficient moderating performance.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. $K_{\infty }$ versus fuel burn up.

Neutrons can be moderated in the SiC, and increasing the SiC matrix share of FCM fuel is the most direct way to improve the moderating performance. The SiC matrix share increases from 60 to 80%, or even 90%, and then $K_{\infty }$ by different SiC matrix share as fuel burn up varies is shown in Figure 4. The calculation results clearly show that increasing SiC matrix share is beneficial to enhance moderating performance and improve fuel reactivity. Figure 4 also presents $K_{\infty }$ of H₂O assembly by different SiC matrix share as fuel burn up varies. Even if the matrix share changes, $K_{\infty }$ of H₂O is still much greater than that of S-CO₂. These results show that the method of increasing the SiC matrix share has a limited effect on improving the moderating performance.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. $K_{\infty }$ by different SiC matrix share versus burn up.

In fact, in terms of fuel burn up and core volume, increasing SiC matrix share is not a good idea; it means the TRISO particle share is reduced and fuel burn up will be grow greatly. To reduce fuel burn up, a larger number of assembles will be used in core, resulting in a larger core volume, and the large core volume makes the design of pressure vessels under high temperature and pressure a great challenge. Therefore, the method to improve the moderating performance should minimize the increase in core volume.

Neutronics Analysis for the Design of YH_1.8 in the Standard Assembly

Because of stronger neutron moderating capacity, metal hydride has been used as a solid moderator in reactors. Yttrium hydride (YH_1.8) is more suitable to use in the S-CO₂ cooled reactor because it is more stable than zirconium hydride (ZrH_1.6) at high temperature.

The design of YH_1.8 solid moderator rod used in this study is shown in Figure 5. To reduce the release of hydrogen atoms, the solid moderator rod is coated with stainless steel. The YH_1.8 solid moderator rod geometry and composition are given in Table 4.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. YH_1.8 solid moderator pin.

TABLE 4

TABLE 4. YH_1.8 solid moderator pin geometry and composition.

The moderating method is to insert the YH_1.8 solid moderator rod into part of fuel holds instead of the FCM fuel. The moderating performance of assembly can be changed by using different number of YH_1.8 solid moderator rods. The number of YH_1.8 solid moderator rod analyzed in this study is shown in Table 5, and the arrangements of the YH_1.8 solid moderator rods are shown in Figure 6.

TABLE 5

TABLE 5. YH_1.8 solid moderator rods number setting.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Arrangements of YH_1.8 solid moderator rods in S-CO₂ assembly.

$K_{\infty }$ by different YH_1.8 solid moderator rod number as fuel burn up varies is shown in Figure 7. The calculation results clearly show that adding YH_1.8 solid moderator rod can significantly enhance moderating performance and then improve the fuel reactivity greatly. $K_{\infty }$ of H₂O is also described in Figure 6. When the number of YH_1.8 solid moderator rods is greater than 12, the $K_{\infty }$of S-CO₂ assembly is significantly larger than that of H₂O assembly. These results show that moderating performance can be improved significantly by inserting the YH_1.8 solid moderator rod. When 12 YH_1.8 solid moderator rods were inserted, the S-CO₂ assembly was moderated sufficiently and the fuel share was reduced by only 22.2%.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. $K_{\infty }$ by different numbers of YH_1.8 rods versus burn up.

The moderating effect of different materials was further studied. Commonly used moderating materials such as graphite and BeO are used for comparison with YH_1.8. $K_{\infty }$ of different moderating materials as fuel burn up varies are shown in Figure 8. $K_{\infty }$ of YH_1.8 is significantly larger than that of graphite and BeO. The results show that using YH_1.8 as a moderator is the best choice to improve the moderating performance of S-CO₂ assembly.

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8. $K_{\infty }$ by different moderating materials versus burn up.

Uniform Moderating Design for the S-CO₂ Assembly

Inserting the YH_1.8 solid moderator rods cause uneven moderating in the assembly. In order to get uniform moderating, the arrangement of the moderators must be studied.

The moderating effect and the change of fuel share were considered, and then the number of YH_1.8 solid moderator rods is selected as 12 in this section. The different arrangements of YH_1.8 solid moderator rods are shown in Figure 9 and power uneven factor by different solid moderator arrangements as fuel burn up varies are shown in Figure 10. The arrangement B of solid moderator obtains the lowest uneven factor and becomes the preferred arrangement in this study.

FIGURE 9

FIGURE 9. Arrangements of 12 YH_1.8 solid moderator rods.

FIGURE 10

FIGURE 10. Power uneven factor by different solid moderator arrangements.

Figure 11 presents the BOL (Begin Of Life) relative power distribution of S-CO₂ assembly using arrangement B. Figure 11 clearly shows that the maximum power is at site A and the minimum power is at site B. In order to further realize the uniform moderating to reduce the power uneven factor, the fuel share of FCM partitioning method is applied in the S-CO₂ assembly design. The fuel share of FCM is reduced from 40 to 35% at site A which have maximum power and the fuel share of FCM is increased from 40 to 45% at site B which have minimum power. In addition, this partitioning method ensures that the fuel weight remains the same in the S-CO₂ assembly. The BOL relative power distribution of S-CO₂ assembly using the partitioning method is shown in Figure 12. The relative power at site A decreases from 1.069 to 0.964, the relative power at site B increases from 0.915 to 1.005, and then the uneven factor decreases from 1.069 to 1.028. Figure 13 presents a power uneven factor by arrangement B with the partitioning method as fuel burn up varies; it shows that the fuel share of the FCM partitioning method can achieve more uniform moderating and power distribution.

FIGURE 11

FIGURE 11. Relative power distribution of S-CO₂ assembly using arrangement B (BOL).

FIGURE 12

FIGURE 12. Relative power distribution of S-CO₂ assembly using the partitioning method (BOL).

FIGURE 13

FIGURE 13. Power uneven factor by arrangement B with the partitioning method.

Conclusion

As a new type reactor with development potential, the S-CO₂–cooled reactor has many advantages, such as simple system, high thermal efficiency, and small volume. FCM fuel which is a potential option of ATF is capable to mitigate the potential consequences of beyond-design-basis accidents and become the preferred type of fuel for the S-CO₂–cooled reactor.

In this article, a new fuel assembly design concept based on FCM fuel for S-CO₂–cooled reactor is proposed. Then, the design of YH_1.8 solid moderator rod was adopted to improve the moderating performance of the fuel assembly. In order to deal with the moderating non-uniformity caused by the moderator, the arrangement of moderators and the method of fuel share partitioning were well studied, and then the high-performance fuel assembly based on FCM fuel for S-CO₂–cooled reactor is proposed at last. The main conclusions of the study are as follows:

1) The fuel assembly based on the FCM fuel for the S-CO₂–cooled reactor was proposed because of the safety advantage. Due to the weak moderating performance of S-CO₂, the neutrons in this assembly cannot be sufficiently moderated and affects the neutronics economy seriously.

2) As it is superior to the method of adjusting the SiC matrix share, the design of YH_1.8 solid moderator rod is studied. With this design, the assembly can be sufficiently moderated.

3) The arrangement of YH_1.8 solid moderator rods is proposed, which can effectively improve the uniformity of moderating. The method of fuel share partitioning is studied at last and the fuel assembly is further uniformly moderated.

4) The high-performance fuel assembly based on the FCM fuel which has good safety and economics is suitable for S-CO₂–cooled reactor.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

DL contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and design. LW contributed to conceptualization and methodology. YC performed the calcualtion and analysis. DW funding acquisition and supervision. CZ visualization and investigation.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Approved no.: 12,075,228).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Ahn, Y., Bae, S. J., Kim, M., Cho, S. K., Baik, S., Lee, J. I., et al. (2015). Review of Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Technology and Current Status of Research and Development. Nucl. Eng. Technology. 47 (6), 647–661. doi:10.1016/j.net.2015.06.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bragg-Sitton, S., and Carmack, W. J. (2015). Update on the DOE's ATF Development Program. Nucl. News. 58, 34–35.

Google Scholar

Bragg-Sitton, S. (2014). Development of Advanced Accident Tolerant Fuels for Commercial LWRs. Nucl. News. 57, 83–91.

Google Scholar

Michael, A. P. (2004). Reactor Physics Design of Supercritical CO₂-Cooled Fast Reactor [D]. Cambridge, MA: Master Thesis of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Google Scholar

Terrani, K. A., Kiggans, J. O., Katoh, Y., Shimoda, K., Montgomery, F. C., Armstrong, B. L., et al. (2012). Fabrication and Characterization of Fully Ceramic Microencapsulated Fuels. J. Nucl. Mater. 426, 268–276. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.03.049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, P., Ma, Y., Gao, C., Liu, W., Shan, J., Huang, Y., et al. (2020). A Review of Research and Development of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle Technology in Nuclear Engineering Applications. Nucl. Eng. Des. 368, 110767. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110767

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, T., Xiong, J., Liu, X., Chai, X., Li, W., and Cheng, X. (2019). Conceptual Design of an Innovative Reduced Moderation Thorium-fueled Small Modular Reactor with Heavy-water Coolant. Int. J. Energy Res. 43, 8286–8298. doi:10.1002/er.4827

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, T., Liu, X., Xiong, J., and Cheng, X. (2020). Comparisons of Reduced Moderation Small Modular Reactors with Heavy water Coolant. Front. Energy Res. 8, 27.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar