Environmental Impact of Sewage Discharge on Shallow Embayment and Mapping of Microbial Indicators

Marine pollution in shallow embayments is hazardous to human and marine health. This research investigates the environmental impact of sewage discharge from coastal outfalls on the semi-enclosed-shallow Doha Bay. Such a study highlights the impact of environmental stressors on the health of such bays. Also, the study assesses the spreading of the pollutant relative to the location of the pollution source. The bay is susceptible to sewage discharge as it is featured slow tidal currents leading to increased pollution concentrations within its basin. The concentrations and distributions of microbial water quality indicators (E. coli, fecal coliform, and fecal streptococci) were investigated parallel with physical and chemical water quality parameters. Water samples were collected from the outfalls and within Doha Bay for four months. The results show that the concentrations of discharged Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Total Organic Carbon (COD), Nitrites ( NO 2 − ) and ammonia (NH3) has exceeded Kuwait Environment Public Authority (KEPA) maximum limits, specifically from the outfalls J3 and J4. In addition, the microbiological parameters were significantly breaching KEPA’s guidelines. The maximum fecal coliform concentration was 3.5 × 105, 2.4 × 104, and 5.4 × 103 CFU/100 ml, E. coli concentration was 2.2 × 105, 1.2 × 104, and 2.6 × 103 CFU/100 ml, fecal streptococci concentration was 7.25 × 102, 4.4 × 102, and 44 CFU/100 ml, at outfalls J3, J4, and J5, respectively, indicating high microbial pollution. The fecal coliform near J3 exceeds the allowable limits of KEPA by more than 600 times. Laboratory results were mapped to assess the microbial indicators within the bay. Spatially, the concentration of pollutants varies and correlates proportionally with the locations of the outfalls. The highly affected area is near outfall J3: a shallow, closed area with minimal water circulation and maximum sewage discharge. Offshore locations show lower pollution concentrations, and the pollutant concentrations were highest in January 2019 and February 2019. Continuing to discharge pollutants through coastal outfalls to regions such as Doha Bay will lead to long-term consequences, including eco-social, ecological, and adverse health impacts that are complex to be treated. Therefore, the bay needs an independent, comprehensive, and reliable monitoring program to measure the environmental indicators continuously.


INTRODUCTION
Many regions within the Arabian Gulf (AG) basin have environmental and economic importance, and many of them are susceptible to environmental alteration due to weak tidal circulation and shallow depths. The environmental pressure increased dramatically over the past sixty years due to rapid development, urbanization, and population increase, especially along the west coast of the gulf. The population increase per year in the AG varied between 1. 83% in 1995and 7.76% in 2010(United Nations, 2019. As a result, the production of household, industrial, and medical sewages increased, and the discharge of pollutants into the sea became a real threat to human and marine lives and the environment. Furthermore, the urbanization was not matched by an appropriate waste treatment plant development, leading to a significant increase in pumping wastes (especially household sewage) to the sea. For example, there are five wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Kuwait with a total treatment capacity of 324.34 million m 3 /year with an annual average of 275.3 million m 3 /year of treated wastewater. Comparing this with the 364.19 million m 3 /year inflow of sewage to the WWTPs, 88.89 million m 3 /year remains untreated and discharged to the sea (Aleisa and Al-Shayji, 2019). In addition, some of the treated water (about 42%) is pumped to the sea (Aleisa and Al-Shayji, 2019).
One of the most environmentally sensitive locations within the AG is Kuwait Bay (KB), located in the northwestern part of the gulf. The bay is a narrow-mouthed and semi-enclosed shallow embayment around 35 km wide and 130 km long coastline with a maximum depth of 23 m and mean depth of 5 m (Pokavanich and Alosairi, 2014;Devlin et al., 2015) and is a nutrient-rich area and is considered one of the most affluent fish and shrimp nursery areas and a feeding ground for wading birds in the AG (Al-Yamani et al., 2004;Devlin et al., 2015). Also, it is the home of the major trading ports linking Kuwait to the world ( Figure 1) and the fishing industry, which is the second leading natural source after oil . In addition, the Shatt Al-Arab River supplies the northern part of the bay with significant nutrients, and as a result, this part of the bay experiences high phytoplankton productivity characterized by high diversity and a strong diatoms dominance (Polikarpov et al., 2009;Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2011).
Over the past few decades, the environmental status of Kuwait Bay has continued to decline due to the continued pumping of pollutants through coastal outfalls and the outlets of power and desalination plants. Figure 2 shows that 50 outfalls are spreading along the bay's western and southern coasts. Although prohibited by the KEPA's bylaws, many of these outfalls are still active (Kepa, 2014). This environmental deterioration is causing several environmental, biological, and health problems. Desalination plants release super saline warm water (brine), raising the salinity level to 4% . The impact of brine discharge is apparent significantly near the shallow inner parts of the bay . Through the outfalls, KEPA and the Ministry of Public Works data show that different pollutants are discharged to the bay, such as industrial, medical, and household wastes. The northern AG and KB are dominated by anticlockwise circulation patterns and have a low seawater exchange rate. As a result, sediments originating from the Shatt Al-Arab estuary are deposited inside the bay, forming the extensive north intertidal mudflats (Al-Yamani and Saburova, 2011) and causing the northern part of the bay to be considerably shallower and slow down the flushing characteristics than the other parts (Al-Ghadban et al., 2002). In 2010, Rakha and others Rakha et al. (2010) divided the bay into 1) east zone and 2) west zone. The east zone has a relatively high current with a velocity of >1 m/ s at the center of the bay (Al-Ghadban and Salman, 1993). This zone is influenced by Shatt Al Arab and is characterized by lower temperatures and salinity. The west zone is shallower, with low tidal currents and higher salinity. In general, the current speed decreases toward the western portion of the bay (Pokavanich and Alosairi, 2014). Tides, winds, and density are the main factors affecting water circulation in the bay and the upper part of the Arabian Gulf (Al-Yamani et al., 2004;Pokavanich et al., 2013). Pokavanich and Alosairi (2014) reported that sluggish tidal currents were detected at high tide and low tide toward the western parts of the bay.
Previous studies agreed that KB is characterized by slow flushing time (Gopalakrishnan, 1989;Rakha et al., 2010;Pokavanich et al., 2013;Pokavanich and Alosairi, 2014). These studies showed that the flushing time of the bay could vary between two months to 2 years. However, Pokavanich and Alosairi (2014) results showed that taking the wind and density-driven current into consideration reduces the bay's flushing time to 65 days. The flushing characteristics are crucial for estimating pollutants' residence time within the bay and determining the most vulnerable environmental areas.
The western part of the bay is characterized by shallow water and low tidal currents, so it is anticipated that pollutants need a longer time to exit and disperse than other parts of the bay. Doha Bay (DB), also named Dawhat Kazima, or Jahra Bay, is a semienclosed embayment far west of Kuwait Bay ( Figure 3) and is bordered by the southeast, highly dense polluted Sulaibikhat Bay (SB) as well as Doha Desalination Plant. There are two emergency outlets and five stormwater outfalls along the DB west and south coasts ( Figure 3). DB receives large amounts of municipal waste from Kuwait City and various illegal industrial units (Baby, 2011).
The field visits of this study revealed that the excess untreated water is discharged to DB through the two emergency outfalls, and hence the deterioration in the bay's environmental status is due mainly to wastewater discharge from the outfalls. Lyons and others in 2015Lyons et al. (2015 found highly polluted sediments in DB with high fecal sterol contamination, where levels of pollution indicate raw or partially treated sewage. Furthermore, high concentrations of nutrients, trace metals, and other dissolved and particulate matter are evident in DB . Several studies (Al-Muzaini et al., 1999;Al-Mutairi et al., 2014;Al-Mutairi et al., 2015) described DB as the most heavily affected area of KB by pollutants. However, to our knowledge, no previous studies are available that focus solely on DB and specify the type of the pollutants and their sources. The study fills this gap, investigates the fate of untreated wastewater from the treatment plants, and determines the distribution of pollution levels of different microbial indicators within the bay. To date, information on the potential impacts of the coastal outfalls on water quality in neighboring areas and offshore is insufficient and difficult to access. This study highlights the impact of environmental stressors on the health of such bays. Also, the study assesses the spreading of the pollutant relative to the location of the pollution source. The study focuses on examining microbiological pollution indicators (fecal coliform, E. coli, and fecal streptococci) and their distribution within DB and studying the distribution of microbiological indicators from the source (outfalls) to offshore.

METHODOLOGY Field Measurements, Water Sampling, and Laboratory Analysis
The field campaign started in October 2018 and lasted until February 2019. The water temperature and salinity and some of the physical/chemical parameters of the water were measured in the field using the CASTAWAY-CTD and Professional Plus Multiparameter Water Quality Professional Plus. Also, water samples were collected from eight locations in DB at five offshore locations and three outfalls ( Figure 3 and Table 1). Samples from outfalls were collected during the low tide to avoid mixing the outfall discharge and the ambient seawater. The samples were collected using sterile plastic bottles of 1 L, stored in an icebox to limit biological and chemical activity, transported to the laboratory, and kept at 20 C. Unfortunately, it was impossible to obtain samples from the outfalls J1 and J2 and the area between the outfalls and the  offshore due to safety concerns; the area is muddy, has soft beds, and is very shallow even at high tide was hard to reach by boat. J3 serves Saad Al-Abdallah residential area and Al-Jahra industrial area, J4 serves Sulaibiya Wastewater Treatment and Amghara industrial area, and J5 serves Jaber Al-Ahmad residential area ( Figure 4). Water samples analysis was carried out at the National Unit of Environmental Research and Services (NURES) Project no-SRUL01/13, NUERS, Faculty of Science, Kuwait University. The pH, BOD, TSS, TDS, TOC, COD, nitrites, nitrates, ammonia, and phosphate were determined using the standard US EPA test methods (Nelson, 2003). The details of these tests are available through the US EPA website (https://www.epa.gov). In addition, the analysis of microbiological content (fecal coliform, E. coli) was carried out at KEPA laboratories. The isolation and numeration of microbial quality parameters (fecal coliform and E. coli) were conducted at each site for seawater samples to estimate the level of sewage contamination. This was undertaken using the membrane filter technique following the methods recommended by the Regional Organization for the Protection of the Marine Environment (Moopam, 2010) and Section 9222 D of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (American Public Health Association (Apha), 1992). Under the aseptic technique, volumes 0.1, 1, 3, and 10 ml and serial dilution (10 −1 , 10 −3 , and 10 −5 ) using 0.1% peptone water for each seawater were filtered through sterile a 47-mm diameter, 0.45 μm pore size cellulose filter paper. Filter papers were then placed separately on m-FC media (EMD, Germany) with 10 ml 1% Rosolic acid in 0.2N NaOH, pH 7.4 plates. The plates were incubated at 44°C for 24 h. Counts were adjusted to the number of colonies per 100/ml of sample filtered . The formula used to Counts the number of colonies per 100/ml of sample filtered is No. of bacteria 100 ml No. of bacteria colonies × 100 The volume of the sample taken (1) Finally, fecal streptococci were analyzed at MPW-Sanitary Engineering Sector-laboratories. Details of the laboratory analysis can be found in (Al-Nasser, 2022).

Statistical Data Analysis and Mapping
The statistical analysis and pollutant concentration mapping were conducted using SPSS and ArcGIS software. The statistical analysis includes DB water's physical, chemical, and biological characteristics. The data of temperature, Acidity (pH), salinity, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), nitrate (NO 3 − ), phosphorus, ammonia, and the microbiological indicators from the three outfalls and five offshore locations are included in the statistical analysis. In addition, all the data was compared to KEPA water quality standards and previous studies to assess the pollution level.
The concentration maps of E. coli, fecal coliform, and fecal Streptococci were done as follows: 1) The concentration map production was achieved using the Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation method. The resulted map shows the concentration variation of the biological indicators spatially and temporally. 2) Scatter plots were created to monitor the variation of the biological indicators. 3) Charts to find the relationship between the pollutant levels and the distance from the pollution source were created.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The result presentation and discussion below are based on the guidelines for water quality discharged into Kuwait seawater, and the Guidelines for Seawater quality and bacterial indicators in recreational coastal water are presented in Tables 2, 3, respectively. Table 4 summarizes the statistics of the water quality parameters from the J3, J4, and J5 outfalls, and Table 5 presents those of the offshore locations. The temperature differences between the three outfalls were negligible during the measurement times. However, the mean and maximum temperatures at the offshore locations ( Table 5) were higher than those at the outfalls, while the minimum temperature was slightly lower. During all field campaigns, the temperature difference between the discharged water to the sea and the ambient seawater never exceeded 5°C, the    (Alkhalidi et al., 2021). It is necessary to mention that the higher salinity and temperature at D5 are due to its location offshore Doha power and Desalination plant, where numerous brine is discharged continuously (Nadi, 2015). Also, it is essential to mention that many fish kills incidents have occurred near this location over many years (Heil et al., 2001;Glibert et al., 2002;Islam and Tanaka, 2004 The environment law of Kuwait requires that the pH level discharged to the sea must be between 6 and 9 (Kepa, 2014). The pH levels measured at the outfalls were within the allowable ranges of KEPA, with mean pH at outfalls J3, J4, and J5 being 7.5, 7.4, and 7.9, respectively. Inside DB, the maximum and mean pH values (Table 4) were slightly above the maximum seawater quality limit of KEPA (6.5 < pH < 8. The mean concentration of BOD at J3, J4, and J5 was 26, 11.6, and 3.3 mg/L, respectively. While the maximum recorded value of BOD was low at J5 (5.2 mg/L), it exceeds KEPA allowable limits (20 mg/L) six times at J3 (119 mg/L) and nearly two and half times at J4 (48 mg/L). Both maximum values at J3 and J5 were recorded in August 2018. Different studies (Al-Muzaini et al., 1991;Al Bakri and Kittaneh, 1998;El-Anbaawy et al., 2018) reported BOD levels in the range of 14-209 mg/L in SB (Figure 2), where many outfalls exist. The BOD and DO are inversely related, and hence in addition to the impact of high temperature, salinity, and evaporation rates, discharging pollutants with these high levels of BOD into DB and KB contribute significantly to the deterioration of the environmental status of the bay, the diversity of species, and the fish stock decline (Martina and Radjawane, 2019;Alqattan and Gray, 2021).

Physical and Chemical Water Quality Indicators
The mean TSS concentration at J3 was excessively high, with maximum, minimum, and mean values of 2184, 88, and 547 mg/ L, respectively. The maximum concentration recorded was 2184 mg/L in October 2018. Knowing that the maximum concentration level allowed from KEPA to be discharged to the sea is 10 mg/L, the amount of TSS disposed to the sea from J3 is unacceptable and contributes to the bay's environmental deterioration. The mean concentrations of TSS at J4 and J5 were 23 and 16.4 mg/L, respectively, while the maximum values were 72 and 26 mg/L. These levels are also above KEPA maximum limits but much lower than J3. Offshore the mean TSS concentration was 10.16 mg/L, with a maximum value of 30 mg/L at D1 recorded in September 2018 and a minimum value of 2 mg/L at D5 recorded in December 2018. KEPA's maximum allowed value for TSS in the coastal water of Kuwait is 30 mg/L. In KB, the mean concentration of TSS is 14.1 mg/L, with a maximum of 29.1 mg/L (Al-Mutairi et al., 2014). Comparing the TSS values inside the bay with those outside the bay, the bay's high TSS is due to sewage discharge and the shallowness of the western part of the bay . Other factors of high TSS are the Shamal wind, rainstorms, and the bay's slow flushing (Devlin et al., 2019). These factors also elevate the turbidity values in winter (Devlin et al., 2019). Since D5 is located at the DB entrance (the faster water flushing, larger tidal currents, and deeper water), TSS is significantly lower than the other offshore stations. KEPA's stations Z02 recorded a mean and maximum concentration of TSS of 17.2 and 985 mg/L, respectively.
The maximum concentrations of TDS in Table 4 were all measured in August 2018. A maximum concentration of 8328 mg/L was measured at J5, and the minimum, 708 mg/L, was measured at J4 in December 2018. Dashti and Al-Haddad (2019), in April and May 2019, found higher TDS concentrations near the outfalls of SB. The range of TDS in their sampling campaign was between 31,747 mg/L and 44,270 mg/L. Al Bakri and Kittaneh (1998) classified DB as a slightly polluted embayment with TDS. High TDS concentrations are expected in such embayment due to natural and human stressors such as extreme climate and excessive waste discharge.
On the other hand, the TOC levels at the outfalls and offshore were lower than KEPA maximum limits. For example, KEPA requires that TOC concentration discharged to the sea not exceed 40 mg/L while the maximum concentration measured was 25.8 mg/L at J3 in December 2018. These measurements contradict many studies that reported high levels of TOC in KB in general. Al-Said and others Al-Said et al. (2018) conducted a two-year water sampling campaign to assess the TOC of Kuwait's territorial coastal water from 2014 to 2016. Their findings showed that high TOC levels in Kuwait's coastal water are the highest measured in any marine system. Also, they reported that these TOC levels are maximum in DB and decrease offshore and toward the open water. Two leading contributors increase the TOC levels in seawater. These contributors are the waste discharge and the high salinity due to the brine discharge, making the seawater denser. The discrepancy between the TOC of this study and (Al-Said et al., 2018) requires establishing a monitoring program for Doha Bay due to its environmental sensitivity and importance and because it is considered the most polluted area in Kuwaiti regional waters. KEPA allows water to be discharged to the sea with a COD level of not more than 100 mg/L Kepa (2014). The data of this study show that the mean COD concentrations exiting J3 and J4 outfalls are 226 and 105 mg/L, respectively. The mean and maximum COD concentrations existing from J5 were 39.7 and 96, respectively, below the KEPA maximum limit, while the maximum COD level was measured at J3 at a value of 518 mg/L in August 2018. The second highest values were recorded at J4 with a maximum value of 201 mg/L in August 2018. Seater samples collected from SB by El-Anbaawy et al. (2018) show high levels of COD in the range of 94.3 and 120 mg/ L. The high levels of COD deplete the oxygen demand in the seawater and hence directly affect the environment and marine life.
Nitrites (NO 2 − ) are produced from wastewater treatment and desalination plants. The mean The data from outfalls J4 and J5 shows negligible levels of NO 2 . On the other hand, the NO 2 at J3  Frontiers in Environmental Science | www.frontiersin.org June 2022 | Volume 10 | Article 914011 8 was significantly high, with a mean value of 29.8 μg/L and a maximum value of 89.4 μg/L measured in October 2018. Still, the mean NO 2 concentration in DB was 0.23 μg/L, and the maximum was 0.6 μg/L, which is significantly lower than the KEPA seawater quality maximum value for NO 2 , 35 μg/L. DB's nitrate (NO 3 − ) levels were negligible compared to KEPA seawater quality maximum value for NO 3 , 95 μg/L. Phosphate (PO 3− 4 ) concentrations were within KEPA seawater quality maximum value for PO 4 , 34 μg/L, at the outfalls and offshore. The maximum concentration from the outfalls was 4.8 μg/L recorded at J3, and the maximum offshore concentration was 0.3 μg/l. A high concentration of PO 4 (>1000 μg/L) was recorded by KEAP and the ministry of Public Works in 2009 in KB due to the Mishref pumping station breakdown and discharging of raw sewage directly to the sea.
The mean concentration of ammonia (NH 3 ) in J3 and J4 was 17.2 and 15 μg/L, respectively, and there was no NH 3 measurement at J5. The maximum concentration of NH 3 was 28.9 μg/L measured at J3 and was 18.2 μg/L at J4. These values  exceeded KEPA's maximum allowable NH 3 to be discharged to the sea, 1 μg/L.

Microbiological Indicators: Fecal Coliform, Escherichia coli, and Fecal Streptococci
Microbiological pollution near coastal areas is hazardous to beach users because feces may contain pathogenic microorganisms that can be ingested and bring intestinal problems (Lee et al., 2002;Lee, 2006). Studies and Epidemiological surveys revealed a positive correlation between fecal pollution in coastal areas and swimming diseases (Wade et al., 2003). KEPA seawater quality guidelines of bacterial indicators in water discharge through coastal outfalls are 500 CFU/100 ml for fecal coliform bacteria, 500 CFU/100 ml for Escherichia coli, and 200 CFU/ 100 ml for fecal streptococci bacteria. During the field campaign of this study, samples and measurements were taken from the three outfalls (J3, J4, and J5) and offshore locations (D1-D5). It was noticed that the sewage discharge from J5 was minimal compared to J3 and J4, and there was no continuous raw sewage discharge to the sea from J5. Table 6 summarizes the microbial water quality indicators at the outfalls. Figure 5 presents the spatial and temporal variations of the microbiological water quality indicators. Table 6 and Figure 5 show extremely high fecal coliform and E. coli at all outfalls and offshore locations, specifically during January and February 2019 (Figures 6, 7). The minimum E. coli concentration was 5 × 10 2 CFU/100ml, the maximum limit concentration allowed by KEPA (discharged from J5 in December 2018). The mean concentration of E. coli from J3 is nearly 18 and 86 times that from J4 and J5, respectively. fecal Streptococci concentration levels discharged from the J5 outfall were consistently below the KEPA maximum allowed limit, but at J3 and J4, the mean levels exceeded KEPA maximum limits by 3.65 and 2.2 times, respectively. The maximum level of fecal coliform varies between 1 × 10 4 and 3.5 × 10 5 CFU/100 ml at J5 and J3, respectively. These levels are exceeding the KEPA maximum limits significantly. The minimum levels of fecal coliform were between 2.5 × 10 3 and 3 × 10 5 CFU/100 ml at J4 and J3, respectively. These levels are also high, exceeding KEPA limits, and indicating the beaches of DB can be considered a health hazard location for swimmers and the health of the bay's fish consumers. Figures 6-8 show the maximum concentration of the microbiological indicators in DB using ArcGIS. The figures show the highest concentration was in the west area of DB, around D1 and D2, and the lowest concentration was around J5 and D3. The concentration around D4 and D5 was higher than around D3 due to the waste discharge from SB (north-south of D4 and D5). The concentration of the extreme values near D1 and D2 because they are very close to the outfall J3, which discharges more pollutants to the bay than the other outfalls (Figures 6-8).
The results in Table 6 confirm the claim of Aleisa and Al-Shayji (2019) that 88.89 million m 3 /year of wastewater remains untreated and discharged to the sea. In addition, Lyons et al. (2015) indicated that illegal connections to the storm drains are responsible for the sewage pollution in DB. Figure 5 shows that DB is highly polluted with microbiological indicators, and this pollution is mainly due to the continuous sewage discharge from the three outfalls, specifically from J3. Locations D1 and D2 are significantly more polluted than D3, D4, and D5. This significant more pollution at D1 and D2 is because these two locations are closer to outfalls J3 and J4 and are in shallower water depths than the other locations. Saeed and others Saeed et al. (2015) reported that most of the southern part of KB is highly polluted with fecal.

CONCLUSION
The water quality parameters and the microbiological indicators measured in this study show that DB is heavily polluted, especially in the southwest. In addition to the natural impactors such as temperature and salinity, sewage discharge to sensitive coastal areas similar to DB increases the environmental impact as such areas are shallow and feature slow flushing characteristics. The high concentrations of discharged BOD, TSS, TDS, COD, Nitrites (NO 2 − ), and ammonia (NH 3 ), which exceeds KEPA maximum limits, will cause long-term environmental deterioration, specifically during the summer when the temperature and evaporation rates and salinity are high. Outfall J3 poses a more significant environmental hazard to people's health and marine life among the three outfalls. It serves heavily populated residential and industrial areas (Figure 4), and it discharges intensive raw sewage to the sea. The minimum and maximum fecal coliform at J3 were 600 and 700 times the maximum KEPA limit. The microbiological waste discharge from the other two outfalls is still higher than the maximum KEPA limits; at J5, the location of minimum waste discharge, the fecal coliform was six times higher than the maximum KEPA limit. The results in Table 6 confirm the claim of Aleisa and Al-Shayji (2019) that a large amount of wastewater remains untreated and discharged to the sea. In addition, the results enhance the claim of Lyons et al. (2015) that illegal connections to the storm drains are contributing to the pollution in DB.
The concentration distribution of fecal coliform and E. coli in DB is disastrous, with levels that exceed all standards and limits. This distribution contributes to the decline in fish stock and the health of marine life. Also, for beach users, these levels of concentrations are hazardous and could be a source of different diseases.
Therefore, we conclude that the DB is under massive environmental stress due to the discharge from the outfalls. The biological importance of the bay necessitates developing a comprehensive monitoring program to measure the environmental indicators continuously. Also, it is essential to control the sewage discharge from the outfalls within DB and SB, especially the illegal discharges, to reduce future environmental consequences. In addition, numerical hydrodynamic and environmental studies are recommended to track the pollutant movement and distribution and test offshore outfalls' effect on reducing marine pollution. Offshore and deepwater outfalls were used and were environmentally effective in Italy, Brazil, Salvador, and Australia (Philip and Pritchard, 1996;Bocci et al., 2006;Roth et al., 2016;Feitosa, 2017;Besley and Birch, 2019b,c,a;Manning et al., 2019).

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
MA and HA-S conceived the presented idea and the methodology. ZA-N did the field investigations and the laboratory analysis. All authors conducted the result analysis and findings, and the conclusion was established by MA. MA wrote most of the manuscript, and ZA-N and HA-S reviewed and edited the manuscript.