Editorial: Lianas, ecosystems, and global change
Geertje M. F. van der Heijden
Stefan A. Schnitzer
Félicien Meunier- 1School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- 2Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama
- 3Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- 4Department of Environment, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Editorial on the Research Topic
Lianas, ecosystems, and global change
Lianas (woody vines) are an abundant and diverse plant group in tropical ecosystems (Gentry, 1991; Dewalt et al., 2014). While they enhance forest canopy connectivity and provide food and shelter for tropical fauna (Yanoviak and Schnitzer, 2013; Schnitzer, 2018), lianas also intensely compete with trees for resources, and hence negatively influence a wide range of tropical ecosystem processes (van der Heijden et al., 2013), such as regeneration (Schnitzer et al., 2000; Pérez-Salicrup, 2001), tree reproduction (García León et al., 2018), and carbon storage and sequestration (van der Heijden et al., 2015).
Although the knowledge on lianas has developed significantly since Darwin's initial work on climbing plants (Darwin, 1865), studies in tropical forests still overwhelmingly focus on trees (da Cunha Vargas et al., 2020). This special issue brings together a collection of papers that provide new insights into the diversity of lianas, their impact on the ecosystem, and their relationships with climate.
Liana (functional) diversity
Lianas are plants that rely on the architecture of other plants to ascend to the forest canopy (Schnitzer and Bongers, 2002). They have therefore developed a wide diversity of techniques for finding and climbing hosts (Darwin, 1865; Putz, 1984; Dias et al., 2021). For example, many liana species use searcher shoots capable of movement. Hatterman et al. found that liana species vary considerably in their reach, i.e., the distance these searcher shoots can span. The liana species with the longest reach required sufficient rigidity at its basal part, an attribute that comes at the cost of their ability for active movements of the distal parts. There may therefore be a trade-off in lianas between reach and movement, possibly explaining differences in their ability to explore the environment.
Lianas are hypothesized to possess fast-acquisitive functional traits while trees are generally thought to be more conservative (Collins et al., 2016). In concurrence with this hypothesis, Harrison et al. showed that lianas had an increased cellular infrastructure with a high turnover of nutrients and leaf volume demands when compared to trees. Being able to find and use resources effectively may give lianas a growth advantage in dry conditions (Schnitzer, 2005; Schnitzer and van der Heijden, 2019). To test this hypothesis, Smith-Martin et al. compared xylem anatomical traits in lianas and trees both in a wet and seasonally dry forest. They found that lianas have greater vessel diameters than trees particularly in dry forests, but that there was no difference in levels of resistance to embolism, hydraulic failure nor in withstanding greater levels of water-deficit between life-forms. The larger vessels of lianas may support greater hydraulic conductive capacity (Tyree and Ewers, 1999), needed to support the proportionally greater leaf canopy of lianas (Wyka et al., 2013), without the risk of embolism formation.
Lianas, however, are not a functionally homogeneous entity. For example, Coppieters et al. found that two abundant, co-occurring liana species differed substantially in their hydraulic traits, as found in previous studies (Ewers et al., 1989, 1990). Liana diversity is highly variable across the landscape. Souza Gerolamo et al. showed that liana taxonomic diversity across the Brazilian Amazon increased along a hydro-edaphic gradient but decreased slightly along a forest disturbance gradient. Reduction in liana habitat specialization occurred on plateaus with deeper water tables while in valleys liana assemblages were phylogenetically overdispersed. Further research into the spectrum of liana traits and the relationships defining their economic spectrum (see Harrison et al.), ecological filtering, and phylogenetic history is needed to increase our understanding of liana ecology.
The effect of lianas on tropical forest ecosystems
Lianas have long been associated with decreased tree growth (Putz, 1984), but the evidence that supports this negative impact mostly came from primary and seasonally moist forests. However, Becknell et al. now reported significant decreases of the relative growth of trees heavily infested by lianas in a secondary seasonally dry tropical forest. Estrada-Villegas et al. further provided unequivocal evidence that a negative liana impact on trees is found across continents, climates, and forest types. Using a meta-analysis of 50 liana removal experiments across the tropics, they showed that lianas have a significant impact on tree growth, reproduction and recruitment, as well as on biomass accretion and physiological performance.
Meunier et al. further suggested that by accounting for belowground biomass the reduced carbon sequestration and storage in trees and ecosystems caused by lianas could be larger than previously anticipated.
Lianas and global change
Lianas have repeatedly been shown to be increasing in abundance and biomass in the Neotropics (e.g. Phillips et al., 2002 and illustrated in this issue by Becknell et al.). Yet, evidence from other parts of the tropics remains scarce or contradictory (see e.g., Bongers et al., 2020). The underlying drivers of such trends could be related to global change (Schnitzer and Bongers, 2011). Using 15-years of liana fruiting and flowering data, Vogado et al. showed that liana reproduction increased as a response to higher temperatures, reduced rainfall, and following El Niño events in a tropical Australian site. Liana reproduction and abundance are therefore likely to increase under future climate regimes.
Novel methods to study lianas
Liana ecology is benefiting from emerging methods to study lianas. Firstly, the incorporation of lianas in a vegetation model has previously enabled an exhaustive quantification of the impact of lianas on the carbon (di Porcia E Brugnera et al., 2019) and energy (Meunier et al., 2022) cycles. Here, it further provided a first assessment of the effects of lianas on below-ground carbon storage (Meunier et al.), which is inherently challenging to quantify using field techniques. Secondly, Kaçamak et al. demonstrated that combining RGB and multispectral images with Lidar data from drones could generate high resolution views of liana distribution at the top of the canopy that ground-based measurements alone cannot provide. Combining ground- and drone- based data therefore have the potential to provide a major step forward in liana ecology.
Liana research is on the rise, which offers an exciting opportunity to answer many important research questions in liana ecology. As such, we hope that this special issue will contribute to a better understanding of the current and future effects of lianas on tropical forests across continents in a changing climate.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Funding
During the preparation of this manuscript, FM was funded by the FWO as a junior postdoc (grant no. 1214720N) and is thankful to this organization for its financial support.
Acknowledgments
The editors would like to thank all the authors that contributed to this Research Topic as well as specifically thank the reviewers for their support and expertise in evaluating the contributions to this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Bongers, F., Ewango, C. E. N., van der Sande, M. T., and Poorter, L. (2020). Liana species decline in Congo basin contrasts with global patterns. Ecology 101, e03004. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3004
Collins, C. G., Wright, S. J., and Wurzburger, N. (2016). Root and leaf traits reflect distinct resource acquisition strategies in tropical lianas and trees. Oecologia 180, 1037–1047. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3410-7
da Cunha Vargas, B., Grombone-Guaratini, M. T., and Cerdeira Morellato, L. P. (2020). Lianas research in the neotropics: overview, interaction with trees, and future perspectives. Trees. 35, 333–345. doi: 10.1007/s00468-020-02056-w
Darwin, C. (1865). On the movement of climbing plants. J. Linn. Soc. 9, 1–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1865.tb00011.x
Dewalt, S. J., Schnitzer, S. A., Alves, L. F., Bongers, F., Burnham, R. J., Cai, Z., et al. (2014). “Biogeographical patterns of liana abundance and diversity,” in Ecology of Lianas, eds S. A. Schnitzer, F. Bongers, R. J. Burnham, and F. E. Putz, 131−146. doi: 10.1002/9781118392409.ch11
di Porcia E Brugnera, M., Meunier, F., Longo, M., Krishna Moorthy, S. M., De Deurwaerder, H., Schnitzer, S. A., et al. (2019). Modeling the impact of liana infestation on the demography and carbon cycle of tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3767–3780. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14769
Dias, A., Oliveira, R., Martins, F., Bongers, F., Anten, N., Sterck, F., et al. (2021). Climbing Mechanisms as a Central Trait to Understand the Ecology of Lianas – a Global Synthesis. Authorea. doi: 10.22541/au.162004148.87250667/v1
Ewers, F. W., Fisher, J. B., Chiu, S., Ewers, W., and Chi, S. (1990). A survey of vessel dimensions in stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms. Oecologia 84, 544–552. doi: 10.1007/BF00328172
Ewers, F. W., Fisher, J. B., Ewers, F. W., and Fisher, J. B. (1989). Variation in vessel length and diameter in stems of six tropical and subtropical lianas. Am. J. Botany 76, 1452–1459. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15126.x
García León, M. M., Izquierdo, L. M., Arantes Mello, F. N., Powers, J. S., and Schnitzer, S. A. (2018). Lianas reduce community-level canopy tree reproduction in a Panamanian forest. J. Ecol. 106, 737–745. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12807
Gentry, A. H. (1991). “The distribution and evolution of climbing plants,” in The Biology of Vines, eds F. E. Putz, and H. A. Mooney (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 3–49 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511897658.003
Meunier, F., Visser, M. D., Shiklomanov, A., Dietze, M. C., Guzmán, Q., Sanchez-Azofeifa, J. A., et al. (2022). Liana optical traits increase tropical forest albedo and reduce ecosystem productivity. Global Change Biol. 28, 227–244. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15928
Pérez-Salicrup, D. R. (2001). Effect of liana cutting on tree regeneration in a liana forest in Amazonian Bolivia. Ecology 82, 389–396. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082(0389:EOLCOT)2.0.CO;2
Phillips, O. L., Vásquez Martínez, R., Arroyo, L., Baker, T. R., Killeen, T., Lewis, S. L., et al. (2002). Increasing dominance of large lianas in Mazonian forests. Nature 418, 770–774. doi: 10.1038/nature00926
Putz, F. E. (1984). The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65, 1713–1724. doi: 10.2307/1937767
Schnitzer, S. A. (2005). A mechanistic explanation for global patterns of liana abundance and distribution. Am. Nat. 166, 262–276. doi: 10.1086/431250
Schnitzer, S. A. (2018). Testing ecological theory with lianas. New Phytol. 220, 366–380. doi: 10.1111/nph.15431
Schnitzer, S. A., and Bongers, F. (2002). The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 223–230. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02491-6
Schnitzer, S. A., and Bongers, F. (2011). Increasing liana abundance and biomass in tropical forests: emerging patterns and putative mechanisms. Ecol. Lett. 14, 397–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01590.x
Schnitzer, S. A., Dalling, J. A., and Carson, W. (2000). The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration. J. Ecol. 88, 656–666. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00489.x
Schnitzer, S. A., and van der Heijden, G. M. F. (2019). Lianas have a seasonal growth advantage over co-occurring trees. Ecology 100, e02655. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2655
Tyree, M. T., and Ewers, F. W. (1999). “Hydraulic architecture of woody tropical plants,” in Tropical Plant Ecophysiology, eds S. S. Mulkey, R. L. Chazdon, and A. P. Smith (New York, NY: Chapman and Hall), 217–243. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1163-8_8
van der Heijden, G., Powers, J. S., and Schnitzer, S. A. (2015). Lianas reduce forest-level carbon accumulation and storage. PNAS 112, 13267–13271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504869112
van der Heijden, G. M., Schnitzer, S. A., Powers, J. S., and Phillips, O. L. (2013). Liana impacts on carbon cycling, storage and sequestration in tropical forests. Biotropica 45, 682–692. doi: 10.1111/btp.12060
Wyka, T. P., Oleksyn, J., Karolewski, P., and Schnitzer, S. A. (2013). Phenotypic correlates of the lianescent growth form: a review. Ann. Botany 112, 1667–1681. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct236
Keywords: plant life-forms, functional traits, tropical forests, liana ecology, liana diversity
Citation: van der Heijden GMF, Schnitzer SA and Meunier F (2023) Editorial: Lianas, ecosystems, and global change. Front. For. Glob. Change 6:1079620. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1079620
Received: 25 October 2022; Accepted: 23 January 2023;
Published: 02 February 2023.
Edited by:
Nophea Sasaki, Asian Institute of Technology, ThailandReviewed by:
Francis Edward Putz, University of Florida, United StatesCopyright © 2023 van der Heijden, Schnitzer and Meunier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Geertje M. F. van der Heijden, 
geertje.vanderheijden@nottingham.ac.uk
†These authors have contributed equally to this work