Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Hortic., 07 September 2023
Sec. Viticulture, Pomology, and Soft Fruits
Volume 2 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2023.1225780

Challenges for the European research in organic fruit production

  • 1Department of Plant Protection, National Institute of Horticultural Research, Skierniewice, Poland
  • 2Centre for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Conegliano, Italy
  • 3Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy

1 Introduction

The market for organic products in the European Union (EU) has recorded a growth rate of 8% in 2019, to reach a value of retail sales of about EUR 41.4 billion (Trávníček et al., 2021), in line with the global trend (Willer and Lernoud, 2021), transforming the sector from a niche into one of the pillars of agri-food production systems. The production sector has responded with a more than 50% increase of the share of EU agricultural land managed according to organic farming rules over the period 2012-2020, achieving 14.8 million ha (9.1% of the total EU agricultural land) in 2020, with fruit, olives and grape crops representing 11% of the organic land area (European Commission, 2023). This situation has been reached also as a result of several EU policies (e.g. through the Common Agricultural Policy) developed since the first enactment of EU rules on organic products in 1991, up to the recent Green Deal and Farm to Fork strategies (European Commission, 2020) and the Action Plan on organic farming (European Commission, 2021).

To achieve the target of 25% of total agricultural production by 2030 set in the above-mentioned EU policy documents, the number of organic producers in the EU needs to increase at a faster rate and organic fruit growers need to increase their share of market supply. However, converting from conventional to organic production systems is a challenging path, as, particularly for fruit crops, organic fruit production is technically demanding and knowledge-intensive, thus requiring knowledge sharing as well as dedicated research (Malusà et al., 2022). Research activity shall particularly focus on the topics that are mostly demanded by farmers and advisors, as recently emerged from an EU-wide survey: plant protection, management of soil and its fertility, improvement of functional biodiversity, varieties and rootstocks suitable for organic cropping systems (Furmanczyk et al., 2022; Parveaud et al., 2022). However, it is our opinion that since the research activity shall support transdisciplinary professional skills in fruit growers and advisors, the correct approach of future research in organic fruit production shall take into consideration also some challenges deriving from the overall trends currently occurring within different domains, i.e. legal (including different implementing measures at member state level of the EU legislation), market-driven, social.

2 The need for biodiversity

Organic farming is considered a system of farm management that combines a high level of biodiversity and the preservation of natural resources with best environmental and climate action practices, where organic plant production shall be based on nourishing the plants primarily through the soil ecosystem (Regulation EU 848/2018). The beneficial effect of organic agriculture on overall biodiversity has been frequently reported (Gabriel et al., 2010; Gangatharan and Neri, 2012; Ponzio et al., 2013). Enhanced biodiversity is a concrete tool to strengthen farm efficiency by enabling important ecological services as pollination or shelter to beneficial arthropods, pests and weed control (Simon et al., 2011; Campbell et al., 2017; Herz et al., 2019; Mia et al., 2021; Fountain, 2022) and maintenance of soil fertility (Mia et al., 2020). However, increased biodiversity in organic farms is generally not sufficient to adequately control harmful pests, which forces the farmer to use authorized plant protection products that can also negatively affect the biodiversity, including that of soil, even though likely to a lesser extent than conventional farming (Malone et al., 2017; Brühl et al., 2022). Research is thus needed to identify site adapted strategies reducing pests’ occurrence in organic systems while keeping high the degree of on farm biodiversity. An interesting approach in this respect could be that of integrating several measures that could strongly limit the need of pesticides (Andrivon et al., 2018; Alaphilippe et al., 2021). However, a better understanding of the impact of the surrounding environment on farm biodiversity, including pests, is also a challenging topic that needs to be addressed. Indeed, within-farm biodiversity is influenced by both management of the farm and management of surrounding farms or the natural landscape (Markó et al., 2017; Nicholson et al., 2017; Katayama et al., 2019), which highlights the relevance of the landscape in the agricultural management of organic orchards.

Restoring functional biodiversity of the agricultural landscape at the farm level (e.g. avoiding mono-cropping) can lead to agroecosystems capable of sustaining their own soil fertility and productivity (Neri et al., 2021; Giorgi et al., 2022). Soil is, indeed, acknowledged as a limited resource, which determines crop productivity and ecosystem sustainability through various ecosystem services. Accumulation of residues from a single crop can disrupt the humification process, delaying the stabilization of the organic matter and favor the release of toxic metabolites (Neri, 2013). These processes may induce specific allelopathic effects (dispathy) accounting for ‘soil sickness’, a complex symptomatology and etiology, commonly observed in several fruit crops, influenced by soil, agronomic conditions, soil and microbiome disfunctions (Cartenì et al., 2016; Cesarano et al., 2017; Polverigiani et al., 2018). However, a conclusive technical solution to them is still lacking also in case of intensive organic orchards.

Soil health is closely related to soil fertility, which, from an agronomical point of view, is associated to the processes of organic matter decomposition, immobilization and mineralization of nutrient elements to be exploited by the plant. However, these processes in organic orchards are seldomly synchronized with the nutrients’ needs of the crop frequently resulting in nutrient imbalances due to biased element composition of fertilizers not matching the overall specific offtakes of crops (Möller, 2018). Practices of soil management aiming at improving the orchard biodiversity (e.g. living mulches or cover crops) can also contribute to reduce nutrient losses by leaching (Thapa et al., 2018), or improve nutrients availability in a variable amount along their growing cycle with benefits for the fruit crop. However, to increase synchronization between nutrients supply and plant demand there is the need to adapt general principles to local conditions and cropping systems, which requires further research.

The application of organic fertilizers or biostimulants (as they are currently defined by the new EU Regulation on fertilizing products) derived from agroindustrial by-products represents an interesting opportunity in organic farming (Polverigiani et al., 2014) that can foster the circular economy approach in organic production related to fertilizers, energy, packaging and other uses (Schifani et al., 2018; Nattassha et al., 2020; Vetroni Barros et al., 2020; Morais et al., 2021). Nevertheless, a key role in this respect is played by the microbiome biodiversity in the soil, which takes part in the biogeochemical cycles and strongly affect soil fertility and plant health (Vassilev et al., 2021; Malusà et al., 2023). The soil, its microbiome and the plants present in the orchard (both the crop and the accompanying species) are involved in direct and indirect relations, which are difficult to predict, and in many cases depend on environmental factors (Kaisermann et al., 2017; Valencia et al., 2018; Tartanus et al., 2021). A comprehensive understanding of these interrelated and context-dependent mechanisms requires studies on management practices and selection/production/application of specific microorganisms to increase crop resilience against different biotic and abiotic stresses. The study of plant–microbiome-soil interactions is now considered fundamental to explain the vegetation dynamics that influence ecosystem composition and functioning. This is leading to enhanced understanding of ecological-evolution and allows better prediction and mitigation of consequences of human-induced global changes, such as climate warming, invasions of alien species and land use changes. To this end, the challenge to be addressed by the researchers in organic fruit production is to acquire a complex set of data to be used as a tool in assessing impacts of introduced formulates (organic and microbial biostimulants, biopesticides, organic fertilizers) on the soil and the plant, to facilitate the efficient application of commercial products in practice. The integration of practices fostering functional biodiversity with the application of pro- or pre- or postbiotics (Vassileva et al., 2020) could lead to new practices with lower environmental impact. However, several practical aspects (e.g. the mode of application, the relation between microbial inocula and rootstocks, etc.) still need to be addressed by research work and to be validated under field conditions to transform a potential opportunity into a successful practice.

3 A sustainable intensification

The research for sustainable production is mandatory to cope with climate change and its impact on the organic fruit cropping systems (Neri et al., 2020). The effects of climate change can be limited by developing innovative strategies (Balafoutis et al., 2017; Roy and George, 2020; Rumpel and Chabbi, 2021; Singh et al., 2022) or adapting traditional techniques in organic orchard and vineyard management (Scialabba and Müller-Lindenlauf, 2010; Polverigiani et al., 2018). However, among the future challenges of sustainable organic farming systems we need to consider the provision of social services.

Social support and consumers appreciation of organic farming systems are crucial to match food safety and security requirements with the conservation of biodiversity and the improvement of the ecosystem services that can be provided by organic farming. The increased concern about contaminants (e.g. PFAS or antibiotics) introduced into the cropping systems through external inputs (e.g. fertilizers, irrigation water) (Cycon et al., 2019; Ghisi et al., 2019) can foster consumers choice favoring the transition toward organic farming, as aspired by the EU strategies. However, a threat to this transition could derive from the development of new certification schemes with appealing names, for both the consumers and the retailers, characterized by less demanding implementing requirements for farmers (e.g. the regenerative agriculture) (Newton et al., 2020). The challenge in this respect will be to prove the higher benefit of organic farming in terms of value of ecosystem services (Meng et al., 2016; Borsotto and Malusà unpublished), food quality (Zikeli et al., 2014) and health (Ferretti et al., 2017). Consumers wishing to reduce their exposure to potentially harmful pesticide residues, nitrates and food additives should be aware that choosing organic produce assures their demands. For this reason, the consumers understanding of the characteristics of the organic cultivation systems has become crucial to the effort in enhancing public health through modern nutrition (i.e. utilizing fruits containing more beneficial metabolites or nutraceuticals) (Brandt et al., 2011; Mditshwa et al., 2017; Sangiorgio et al., 2021). Available data demonstrate the potential for a substantial positive impact on public health and healthcare costs by switching to organic food consumption (Rempelos et al., 2021) but controlled clinical trials confirming a mechanistic understanding of this positive health impact are still missing. Therefore, research is urgently needed to clarify the relationship between agricultural management and the nutritional quality of organic fruit crops, including effects on health protection and the prevention of chronic diseases. The One Health approach (Van Bruggen et al., 2019; Banerjee and van der Heijden, 2023) could be a suitable framework to be applied in this regard, linking environmental health to the animals and human health, as embedded in the holistic principles of organic farming. It is our opinion that this would allow to conclusively rebut the conclusions of Trewavas (2001) or the concerns of Kirchmann (2019). Indeed, in the past twenty years it has been proved that the benefits of organic production are far more reaching than the simple impact on the crop (Wassermann et al., 2019; Krause et al., 2022) and the lower yield of organic crops would be still sufficient to cover food demand when food waste is decreased (Dou and Toth, 2021).

4 Conclusions

Organic horticulture shall promote a shift in the paradigm of fruit production, addressing challenges in the whole food production chain while minimizing environmental pollution and supporting fairness for producers (Arbenz et al., 2017). However, organic fruit production systems currently face the risk of a “substitution” approach, applying products authorized in organic production instead of those allowed in conventional farming, as orchard management methods largely depend on external inputs. However, obtaining these inputs through a circular economy approach could make them less controversial and more efficient in improving soil fertility and health, lowering at the same time also the carbon footprint of the organic cropping systems. The conventionalization of organic food-chains may challenge the credibility of the sector as it highly depends on consumers’ perception. The research efforts should thus embrace a complex approach that could limit the risk of losing this authenticity. Nevertheless, the crucial question of whether organic is “worth the extra cost” will remain on the consumers’ side.

Notwithstanding the focus on avoiding the conventionalization of organic fruit production, it shall be underlined that some regulatory issues are considerably limiting the exploitation of traditional or new “active substances” for plant protection that express multi-functional properties (Kowalska et al., 2020), as well as the possible use of new breeding approaches to support varieties’ evolution (Ristel and Satter, 2014; Kellerhals et al., 2016), which is an obstacle for the improvement of organic orchard management strategies. Engaging in the dialogue with policy makers to support the development of legal provisions could thus be an important challenging role for researchers, which could positively impact on the organic horticultural production systems.

Author contributions

EM and DN contributed to conception and design of the work. EM and DN wrote sections of the manuscript and contributed to manuscript revision, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The paper was funded to EM by the projects AgroBioConnect (grant n. SUSCROP/AgroBioDiv/I/42/AgroBioConnect/2023) and BioHortiTech (grant n. SUSCROP/II/BioHortiTech/01/2021) both receiving funding from NCBR under the SusCrop ERA-NET programme, within FACCE-JPI.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author EM declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Alaphilippe A., Alins G., Borowiec N., de la Fuente E. D., Dardouri T., et al. (2021). API-Tree oucomes: Pesticide-free methods to control apple pests, experimentation and performance. [Research Report] INRAE. Available at: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03352357v2.

Google Scholar

Andrivon D., Bardin M., Bertrand C., Brun L., Daire X., Fabre F., et al. (2018). Can organic agriculture give up copper as a crop protection product? Condensed report of the Scientific collective assessment (Paris, France: INRA), 66. Available at: https://www.inrae.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/expertise-cuivre-en-ab-8-pages-anglais-1.pdf.

Google Scholar

Arbenz M., Gould D., Stopes C. (2017). ORGANIC 3.0—the vision of the global organic movement and the need for scientific support. Org. Agric. 7, 199–207. doi: 10.1007/s13165-017-0177-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Balafoutis A., Beck B., Fountas S., Vangeyte J., Wal T., Soto I., et al. (2017). Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability 9, 1339. doi: 10.3390/su9081339

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banerjee S., van der Heijden M. G. A. (2023). Soil microbiomes and one health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 6–20. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00779-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brandt K., Leifert C., Sanderson R., Seal C. J. (2011). Agroecosystem management and nutritional quality of plant foods: the case of organic fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 177–197. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.554417

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brühl C. A., Zaller J. G., Liess M., Wogram J. (2022). The rejection of synthetic pesticides in organic farming has multiple benefits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 11. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campbell A. J., Wilby A., Sutton P., Wäckers F. (2017). Getting more power from your flowers: multi-functional flower strips enhance pollinators and pest control agents in apple orchards. Insects 8, 101. doi: 10.3390/insects8030101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cartenì F., Bonanomi G., Giannino F., Incerti G., Vincenot C. E., Chiusano M. L., et al. (2016). Self-DNA inhibitory effects: Underlying mechanisms and ecological implications. Plant Signaling Behav. 11, 4. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1158381

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cesarano G., Zotti M., Antignani V., Marra R., Scala F and Bonanomi G. (2017). Soil sickness and negative plant-soil feedback: a reappraisal of hypotheses. J. Plant Pathol. 99, 545–570. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44687125.

Google Scholar

Cycon M., Mrozik A., Piotrowska-Seget Z. (2019). Antibiotics in the soil environment—degradation and their impact on microbial activity and diversity. Front. Microbiol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00338

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dou Z., Toth J. D. (2021). Global primary data on consumer food waste: Rate and characteristics – A review. Resources Conserv. Recycling, 105332. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105332

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. COM2020381 Final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0381 (Accessed 21 April 2023).

Google Scholar

European Commission. (2021). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an Action Plan for the Development of Organic Production’, COM, (2021) 65 final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:13dc912c-a1a5-11eb-b85c-01aa75ed71a1.0003.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (Accessed 21 April 2023).

Google Scholar

European Commission. (2023). Organic farming in the EU – A decade of organic growth. European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels. Available at: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/news/organic-farming-eu-decade-growth-2023-01-18_en (Accessed 21 April 2023).

Google Scholar

European Parliament. (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018R0848 (Accessed 20 June 2023).

Google Scholar

Ferretti G., Neri D., Borsari B. (2017). “Issues of food safety: are organic apples better?,” in Nutrition Guide for Physicians and Related Healthcare Professionals. Eds. Temple N. J., Wilson T., Bray G. A. (Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing), 273–282.

Google Scholar

Fountain M. T. (2022). Impacts of wildflower interventions on beneficial insects in fruit crops: a review. Insects 13, 304. doi: 10.3390/insects13030304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Furmanczyk E. M., Parveaud C.-E., Jacquot M., Warlop F., Kienzle J., Kelderer M., et al. (2022). An overview of pest and disease occurrence in organic pome fruit orchards in Europe and on the implementation of practices for their control. Agriculture 12, 2136. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12122136

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gabriel D., Sait S. M., Hodgson J. A., Schmutz U., Kunin W. E., Bento T. G. (2010). Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 13, 858–869. doi: 10.1111/j.14610248.2010.01481.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gangatharan R., Neri D. (2012). Can biodiversity improve soil fertility in agroecosystems? New Medit 4, 11–18. Available at: https://newmedit.iamb.it/share/img_new_medit_articoli/469_11gangatharan.pdf.

Google Scholar

Ghisi R., Vamerali T., Manzetti S. (2019). Accumulation of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in agricultural plants: A review. Environ. Res. 169, 326–341. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giorgi V., Crescenzi S., Marconi L., Zucchini M., Reig G., Neri D. (2022). Living mulch under the row of young peach orchard. Acta Hortic., 1352. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1352.26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herz A., Cahenzli F., Penvern S., Pfiffner L., Tasin M., Sigsgaard L. (2019). Managing floral resources in apple orchards for pest control: ideas, experiences and future directions. Insects 10, 247. doi: 10.3390/insects10080247

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaisermann A., de Vries F. T., Griffiths R. J., Bardgett R. D. (2017). Legacy effects of drought on plant–soil feedbacks and plant–plant interactions. New Phytol. 215, 1413–1424. doi: 10.1111/nph.14661

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Katayama N., Bouam I., Koshida C., Baba Y. G. (2019). Biodiversity and yield under different land-use types in orchard/vineyard landscapes: A meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 229, 125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kellerhals M., Baumgartner I. O., Schütz S., Lussi L., Andreoli R., Gassmann J., et al. (2016)Approaches in breeding high quality apples with durable disease resistance. In: Proceedings of the Ecofruit, 17th International Conference on Organic-Fruit Growing; Hohenheim, Germany (FOEKO: Weinsberg, Germany) (Accessed 15–17 February 2016).

Google Scholar

Kirchmann H. (2019). Why organic farming is not the way forward. Outlook Agric. 48, 22–27. doi: 10.1177/0030727019831702

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kowalska J., Tyburski J., Matysiak K., Tylkowski B., Malusá E. (2020). Field exploitation of multiple functions of beneficial microorganisms for plant nutrition and protection: real possibility or just a hope? Front. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01904

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Krause H. M., Stehle B., Mayer J., Steffens M., Mäder P., Fliessbach A. (2022). Biological soil quality and soil organic carbon change in biodynamic, organic, and conventional farming systems after 42 years. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 42, 117. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00843-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malone L. A., Burgess E. P. J., Barraclough E. I., Poulton J., Todd J. H. (2017). Comparison of invertebrate biodiversity in New Zealand apple orchards using integrated pest management, with or without codling moth mating disruption, or organic pest management. Agricult Ecosyst. Environ. 247, 379–388. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.046

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malusà E., Furmanczyk E. M., Tartanus M., Brouwer G., Parveaud C.-E., Warlop F., et al. (2022). Knowledge networks in organic fruit production across pecia: a survey study. Sustainability 14, 2960. doi: 10.3390/su14052960

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malusà E., Vassilev N., Neri D., Xu X. (2023). Plant interaction with associated microbiomes to improve plant resiliency and crop biodiversity. Volume II. Front. Plant Sci. 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1143657

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Markó V., Elek Z., Kovács-Hostyánszki A., Kőrösic A., Somay L., Földesi R., et al. (2017). Landscapes, orchards, pesticides–Abundance of beetles (Coleoptera) in apple orchards along pesticide toxicity and landscape complexity gradients. Agricult Ecosyst. Environ. 247, 246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mditshwa A., Magwaza L. S., Tesfay S. Z., Mbili N. (2017). Postharvest quality and composition of organically and conventionally produced fruits: A review. Sci Hortic. 216, 148–159. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.12.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng J., Li L., Liu H., Li Y., Li C., Wu G., et al. (2016). Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability. PeerJ 4, e2137. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2137

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mia M. J., Furmanczyk E. M., Golian J., Kwiatkowska J., Malusá E., Neri D. (2021). Living mulch with selected herbs for soil management in organic apple orchard. Horticulture 7, 59. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7030059

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mia M. J., Monaci E., Murri G., Massetani F., Facchi J., Neri D. (2020). Soil nitrogen and weed biodiversity: An assessment under two orchard floor management practices in NVZ (Italy). Horticulture 6, 96. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae6040096

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Möller K. (2018). Soil fertility status and nutrient input–output flows of specialized organic cropping systems: a review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst 112, 147–164. doi: 10.1007/s10705-018-9946-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morais T. G., Teixeira R. F. M., Lauk C., Theurl M. C., Winiwarter W., Mayer A., et al. (2021). Agroecological measures and circular economy strategies to ensure sufficient nitrogen for sustainable farming. Global Environ. Change 69, 102313. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102313

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nattassha R., Handayati Y., Simatupang T. M., Siallagan M. (2020). Understanding circular economy implementation in the agri-food supply chain: the case of an Indonesian organic fertilizer producer. Agric. Food Secur. 9, 10. doi: 10.1186/s40066-020-00264-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neri D. (2013). Organic soil management to prevent soil sickness during integrated fruit production. IOBC-WPRS Bull. 91, 87–99.

Google Scholar

Neri D., Polverigiani S., Giorgi V., Mia J. M., Zucchini M. (2021). Strawberry living mulch in organic vineyards. Agronomy 11, 1643. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11081643

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neri D., Silvestroni S., Baldoni N., Belletti M., Bellucci E., Bitocchi E., et al. (2020). “Sustainable crop production,” in The First Outstanding 50 Years of Università Politecnica delle Marche – Research Achievements in Life Sciences. Eds. Longhi S., Monteriù A., Freddi A., Aquilanti L., Ceravolo M. G., Carnevali O., Giordano M., Moroncini G. (Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing), 583–600.

Google Scholar

Newton P., Civita N., Frankel-Goldwater L., Bartel K., Johns C. (2020). What is Regenerative Agriculture? A review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicholson C. C., Koh I., Richardson L. L., Beauchemin A., Ricketts T. H. (2017). Farm and landscape factors interact to affect the supply of pollination services. Agricult Ecosyst. Environ. 250, 113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parveaud C.-E., Jacquot A., Warlop F., Dekker T., Revadi S., Oeser N., et al. (2022). “Technical needs in organic fruit growing in Europe: results of BIOFRUITNET’ survey,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Organic Fruit-Growing, online 2022.02.21-23. Ed. FOEKO e.V (Weinsberg, Germany), 119–122.

Google Scholar

Polverigiani S., Franzina M., Neri D. (2018). Effect of soil condition on apple root development and plant resilience in intensive orchards. Appl. Soil Ecol. 123, 787–792. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.04.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Polverigiani S., Kelderer M., Lardschneider E., Neri D. (2014). Organic wastes use in horticulture: influences on nutrient supply and apple tree growth. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 3, 358–371. doi: 10.9734/IJPSS/2014/8351

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ponzio C., Gangatharan R., Neri D. (2013). Organic and biodynamic agriculture: A review in relation to sustainability. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2, 95–110. doi: 10.9734/IJPSS/2013/4493

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rempelos L., Baranski M., Wang J., Adams T. N., Adebusuyi K., Beckman J. J., et al. (2021). Integrated soil and crop management in organic agriculture: a logical framework to ensure food quality and human health? Agronomy 11, 2494. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11122494

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ristel M., Satter I. (2014). “Apfel: Gut—Participatory, organic fruit breeding,” in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Organic Fruit-Growing, Hohenheim, Germany, 17–19 February 2014. 158–161 (Weinsberg, Germany: FOEKO).

Google Scholar

Roy T., George K. J. (2020). “Precision farming: A step towards sustainable, climate-smart agriculture,” in Global Climate Change: Resilient and Smart Agriculture. Eds. Venkatramanan V., Shah S., Prasad R. (Singapore: Springer), 199–220. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9856-9_10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rumpel C., Chabbi A. (2021). Managing soil organic carbon for mitigating climate change and increasing food security. Agronomy 11, 1553. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11081553

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sangiorgio D., Cellini A., Spinelli F., Farneti B., Khomenko I., Muzzi E., et al. (2021). Does organic farming increase raspberry quality, aroma and beneficial bacterial biodiversity? Microorganisms 9, 1617. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081617

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schifani G., Crescimanno M., Migliore G., Demetris V., Galati A. (2018). Innovation strategies geared toward the circular economy: a case study of the organic olive-oil industry. Rivista Di Studi Sulla Sostenibilità 8, 137–158. doi: 10.3280/RISS2018-001011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scialabba N., Müller-Lindenlauf M. (2010). Organic agriculture and climate change. Renewable Agric. Food Syst. 25, 158–169. doi: 10.1017/S1742170510000116

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Simon S., Bouvier J. C., Debras J. F., Sauphanor B. (2011). “Biodiversity and pest management in orchard systems,” in Sustainable Agriculture, vol. 2. Eds. Lichtfouse E., Hamelin M., Navarrete M., Debaeke P. (Dordrecht: Springer), 693–709. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_30

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh R., Kumari T., Verma P., Singh B. P., Raghubashi A. S. (2022). Compatible package-based agriculture systems: an urgent need for agro-ecological balance and climate change adaptation. Soil Ecol. Lett. 4, 187–212. doi: 10.1007/s42832-021-0087-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tartanus M., Furmanczyk E. M., Canfora L., Pinzari F., Tkaczuk C., Majchrowska-Safaryan A., et al. (2021). Biocontrol of Melolontha spp. Grubs in organic strawberry plantations by entomopathogenic fungi as affected by environmental and metabolic factors and the interaction with soil microbial biodiversity. Insects 12, 127. doi: 10.3390/insects12020127

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thapa R., Mirsky S. B., Tully K. L. (2018). Cover crops reduce nitrate leaching in agroecosystems: a global meta-analysis. J. Environ. Qual. 47, 1400–1411. doi: 10.2134/jeq2018.03.0107

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trávníček J., Willer H., Schaack A. (2021). “Organic farming and market development in Europe and the European Union,” in The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends 2021 (Bonn, Germany: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, and IFOAM—Organics International), 229–266.

Google Scholar

Trewavas A. (2001). Urban myths of organic farming. Nature 410, 409–410. doi: 10.1038/35068639

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valencia E., Gross N., Quero J. L., Carmona C. P., Ochoa V., Gozalo B., et al. (2018). Cascading effects from plants to soil microorganisms explain how plant species richness and simulated climate change affect soil multifunctionality. Glob Change Biol. 24, 5642–5654. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14440

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Bruggen A. H. C., Goss E. M., Havelaar A., van Diepeningen A. D., Finckh M. R., Morris J. G. (2019). One Health – Cycling of diverse microbial communities as a connecting force for soil, plant, animal, human and ecosystem health. Sci. Total Environ. 664, 927–937. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.091

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vassilev N., Malusà E., Neri D and Xu X. (2021). Plant interaction with associated microbiomes to improve plant resiliency and crop biodiversity. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.715676

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vassileva M., Flor-Peregrin E., Malusa E., Vassilev N. (2020). Towards better understanding of the interactions and efficient application of plant beneficial prebiotics, probiotics, postbiotics and synbiotics. Front. Plant Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vetroni Barros M., Salvador R., de Francisco A. C., Piekarski C. M. (2020). Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: From waste to energy. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 131, 109958. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109958

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wassermann B., Müller H., Berg G. (2019). An Apple a Day: which bacteria do we eat with organic and conventional apples? Front. Microbiol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01629

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Willer H., Lernoud J. (2021). “Current statistics on organic agriculture worldwide: area, operators and market,” in The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends 2021 (Bonn, Germany: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, and IFOAM—Organics International), 36–128.

Google Scholar

Zikeli S., Rembiałkowska E., Załęcka A., Badowski M. (2014). “Organic farming and organic food quality: prospects and limitations,” in Sustainable Food Production Includes Human and Environmental Health. Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus, vol. 3 . Eds. Campbell W., López-Ortíz S. (Dordrecht, Germany: Springer).

Google Scholar

Keywords: functional biodiversity, soil management, plant nutrition, policies, human health

Citation: Malusà E and Neri D (2023) Challenges for the European research in organic fruit production. Front. Hortic. 2:1225780. doi: 10.3389/fhort.2023.1225780

Received: 19 May 2023; Accepted: 31 July 2023;
Published: 07 September 2023.

Edited by:

Adamo Domenico Rombolà, University of Bologna, Italy

Reviewed by:

Bruno Peter Holzapfel, NSW Government, Australia

Copyright © 2023 Malusà and Neri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Eligio Malusà, eligio.malusa@inhort.pl; eligio.malusa@crea.gov.it

ORCID: Eligio Malusà, orcid.org/0000-0002-9802-3379
Davide Neri, orcid.org/0000-0003-3280-1876

Download