Front. Immunol.Frontiers in ImmunologyFront. Immunol.1664-3224Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fimmu.2014.00327ImmunologyReview ArticleNOD-Like Receptors: Master Regulators of Inflammation and CancerSaxenaMansi1YeretssianGarabet12*1Department of Medicine, Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA2Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Edited by: Anton G. Kutikhin, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Russia
Reviewed by: Dario S. Zamboni, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil; Maya Saleh, McGill University, Canada; Arseniy E. Yuzhalin, University of Oxford, UK
*Correspondence: Garabet Yeretssian, Department of Medicine, Clinical Immunology, Immunology Institute, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 12-20E, New York, NY 10029, USA e-mail: garabet.yeretssian@mssm.edu
This article was submitted to Tumor Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cytosolic NOD-like receptors (NLRs) have been associated with human diseases including infections, cancer, and autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. These innate immune pattern recognition molecules are essential for controlling inflammatory mechanisms through induction of cytokines, chemokines, and anti-microbial genes. Upon activation, some NLRs form multi-protein complexes called inflammasomes, while others orchestrate caspase-independent nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Moreover, NLRs and their downstream signaling components engage in an intricate crosstalk with cell death and autophagy pathways, both critical processes for cancer development. Recently, increasing evidence has extended the concept that chronic inflammation caused by abberant NLR signaling is a powerful driver of carcinogenesis, where it abets genetic mutations, tumor growth, and progression. In this review, we explore the rapidly expanding area of research regarding the expression and functions of NLRs in different types of cancers. Furthermore, we particularly focus on how maintaining tissue homeostasis and regulating tissue repair may provide a logical platform for understanding the liaisons between the NLR-driven inflammatory responses and cancer. Finally, we outline novel therapeutic approaches that target NLR signaling and speculate how these could be developed as potential pharmaceutical alternatives for cancer treatment.
Over the past two decades, immunologists have begun to appreciate the complexity of the innate immune system, its importance as the first wave of defensive action against perceived harmful microbes or foreign particles and its functions in triggering antigen-specific responses by engaging the adaptive immune system. Innate immune responses are orchestrated by germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) (1). PRRs recognize conserved pathogen-derived and damaged self-derived molecular components, commonly referred to as pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), respectively (2, 3). PRR superfamilies are broadly classified based upon structural homology and the requirement of different adaptor proteins that ensure their function and downstream signal transduction (4). The PRRs include members of the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (3), nucleotide-binding, and oligomerization domain containing receptors [NOD-like receptors (NLRs)] (5, 6), retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG) I-like RNA helicases (7), C-type lectins (8), and AIM2 like receptors (ALRs) (9). Evidence in the field points to a paramount importance of NLRs in human diseases with increasing interest in translating this knowledge toward clinical benefits. Due to the active role of NLRs in regulating pro-inflammatory signals and recruiting the adaptive arm of the immune system, dysregulation of microbial sensing has been reported to influence disease outcomes and tumorigenesis (10). In this review, we will describe the crucial roles of NLRs in cancer development and progression, and discuss the possibility of NLRs as targets for tumor therapy.
Factors That Influence Tumorigenesis
Observations by Rudolf Virchow in the nineteenth century indicated a link between inflammation and cancer, and suggested that immune and inflammatory cells are frequently present within tumors. Indeed, chronic inflammation plays critical roles in various stages of cancer development and progression (11–13). Many cancer risk factors are associated with a source of inflammation or act through inflammatory mechanisms such as those evoked by bacterial and viral infections (14), tobacco smoke (15), obesity (16, 17), and aging or cell senescence (18, 19). While some cancers arise from chronic inflammation or after immune deregulation and autoimmunity, solid malignancies elicit intrinsic immune mechanisms that guide the construction of a tumorigenic microenvironment (12, 13, 20). Although the exact mechanism of how inflammation leads to neoplastic transformation is not fully known, it is suggested that inflammatory immune cells like macrophages and T cells are the main orchestrators of inflammation-mediated tumor progression. These cells secrete cytokines and chemokines that cause DNA damage, generate mutagenic reactive oxygen species (ROS), and supply cancer cells with growth factors (13). In addition, inflammatory mechanisms were shown to promote genetic instability by impairing DNA repair mechanisms, altering cell cycle checkpoints, and often facilitating epigenetic silencing of anti-tumor genes, thus contributing to the high degree of genetic heterogeneity in tumors (21). Oncogenic mutations prompted by an inflammatory microenvironment frequently cause neoplastic transformation by promoting excessive proliferation and resistance to cell death (22). Indeed, impaired expression and activity of proteins that control cell survival, such as the inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) and the BCL2 family of proteins, is a common occurrence in many cancers (23, 24). Typically known to exert strong anti-apoptotic functions, IAPs neutralize pro-apoptotic second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC) and inhibit activation of apoptotic caspases, thereby promoting cell survival during both physiological stresses and pathogenic stimulations (25–29). Owing to their strong pro-survival potency, enhanced expression of IAPs has been correlated with several human cancers (22). Unlike IAPs, the BCL2 family of proteins consists of both pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins that control critical checkpoints of intrinsic apoptosis by regulating mitochondrial integrity and release of cytochrome c into the cytosol (30). Deregulation of the functions of BCL2 proteins, i.e., down-regulation of pro-apoptotic members and over expression of pro-survival members, has been strongly correlated with tumorigenesis and resistance to chemotherapy (31). Interestingly, the pro-apoptotic BID, PUMA, and NOXA are transcriptional targets of the tumor suppressor gene p53 and loss of their expression enhances tumorigenesis and morbidity of MYC overexpressing transgenic mice (32, 33). It was described that the transcription factor p53 senses physiological stresses and is critical for restraining tumor growth. Indeed, loss of p53 expression or function in both humans and mice has been proven to promote sporadic tumorigenesis (34, 35). Induction of target genes that inhibit cancer progression is generally considered to be the canonical mechanism of p53-mediated tumor-suppression. These target genes directly modulate cellular programs involving induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and promotion of cellular senescence and DNA repair (36). Recently, non-canonical functions of p53 have come to light, like the regulation of cellular metabolism, cell-to-cell communication, autophagy, tumor invasion, and metastasis, making p53 an attractive pharmaceutical target for treating cancers [reviewed in Ref. (37)]. Early detection of rogue tumor cells by the innate immune cells and their rapid removal is a key host defense strategy for evading tumorigenesis. In particular, natural killer (NK) cells are primary sentinels that guarantee such immune surveillance by differentiating normal cells from stressed or tumor cells via the expression of specific NK receptors (38). Indeed, increased presence of NK cells at tumor sites has been reported to improve remission, whereas decreased NK cell anti-tumor activity has been correlated with a greater likelihood for developing cancer (39).
Nod-Like Receptors in CancerOverview of NLRs
NOD-like receptors are a relatively recent addition to the PRR superfamily (40–42). All NLRs contain a central NACHT domain that facilitates oligomerization, and bear multiple leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) on their C-terminal for ligand sensing (5, 43). The 22 human NLRs can be distinguished into five subfamilies by their N-terminal effector domains that bestow unique functional characteristics to each NLR (43) (Figure 1). NLRs with an N-terminal acidic transactivation domain are termed NLRA (CIITA) and serve as transcriptional regulators of MHC class II antigen presentation (44). NLRB (NAIP) proteins have an N-terminal baculoviral inhibition of apoptosis repeat (BIR) domain and are largely recognized for their roles in host defense and cell survival. For instance, NAIP5 is known to induce host defense against bacterial infections by curtailing macrophage permissiveness to Legionella pneumophila, the causative agent of the Legionnaires’ disease (45–47). N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD) distinguishes the NLRC subfamily (NLRC 1–5) and allows direct interaction between members of this family and other CARD carrying adaptor proteins. NOD1 (NLRC1) and NOD2 (NLRC2), the founding members of the NLRs, are key sensors of bacterial peptidoglycan (PGN) and are crucial for tissue homeostasis and host defense against bacterial pathogens (48). Notably, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the NOD2 (CARD15) gene are among the most significant genetic risk factors associated with Crohn’s disease (CD) susceptibility (49, 50), hence the rising interest in unraveling the functions of NOD1 and NOD2 receptors in microbial sensing, intestinal homeostasis, and disease. Members of the pyrin domain (PYD) containing NLRP subfamily (NLRP 1–14) are best known for their role in inducing the formation of the oligomeric inflammatory complex “Inflammasome” (51). NLRX1, the only described member of the NLRX subfamily contains an N-terminal mitochondria-targeting sequence required for its trafficking to the mitochondrial membrane (Figure 1). Mechanistically, NLRX1 was shown to down-regulate mitochondrial anti-viral signaling protein (MAVS)-mediated type I interferon (IFN) production (52), interfere with the TLR-TRAF6-NF-κB pathways (53, 54), and enhance virus induced-autophagy (55, 56). On the other hand, NLRX1 was implicated in the generation of ROS induced by TNFα and Shigella infection magnifying the JNK and NF-κB signaling (57). Interestingly, NLRX1-mediated ROS generation was involved in promoting Chlamydia trachomatis replication in epithelial cells (58). However, recent data from Soares et al. revealed that bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from Wild type (WT) or Nlrx1−/− mice respond equally to in vitro infection with Sendai virus or following in vivo challenge with influenza A virus and TLR3 ligand Poly I:C (59). Additionally, Rebsamen et al. reported no significant contribution of NLRX1 in RLR–MAVS signaling both in vitro and in vivo (60). Overall, the precise role of NLRX1 remains controversial and further research is required to validate its pro or anti-inflammatory properties.
Schematic representation of individual NLR domains. Domain architecture of human NLRs is depicted here. Human NLRs are sub-classified into five categories: NLRA, NLRB, NLRC, NLRP, and NLRX. All 22 human NLRs contain a central NACHT domain and a C-terminal ligand sensing LRR domain, with the exception of NLRP10. The N-terminal domains ascribe functional properties to the NLRs; however, the function of some of the domains is still unclear like for the N-terminal domain of NLRC3 and NLRC5, as well as the C-terminal FIIND in NLRP1. CARD; caspase association and recruitment domain, ATD; acidic transactivation domain, FIIND; function to find domain, PYD; pyrin domain, BIR; Baculoviral inhibition of apoptosis protein repeat domain, LRR; leucine-rich repeats, MT; targets NLRX1 to the mitochondria but no sequence homology with traditional mitochondrial targeting sequence has been reported.
Dysregulated apoptosis and autophagy pathways, as well as excessive chronic inflammation are major drivers of carcinogenesis. NLRs are innate immune sensors that actively communicate with a myriad of cell death regulators. Hence, these PRRs are well-positioned to influence tumor development and progression particularly at sites with high host-microbiome interactions like the gut. One of the mysteries of the innate immune system is how do NLRs sense molecular patterns from both commensal and pathogenic microorganisms and manage to tolerate one while help eradicate the other (5, 61). This disparity in NLR functions is particularly useful in the intestinal epithelia where host cells are in constant contact with millions of microbes. Consequently, it came as little surprise when common variants in the NLR genes were correlated with the incidence of CD and susceptibility to cancers (50, 62–64). Due to these correlations, most of the studies have been focused on understanding the mechanisms by which NODs and inflammasome NLRs regulate intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis.
NOD1 and NOD2 in CancerNOD-dependent signaling cascades
NOD1 and NOD2 are cytosolic proteins that sense intracellular bacterial PGN and trigger signal transduction via NF-κB and MAPK activation. NOD1 is expressed in both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cells and responds to intracellular gamma-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid (iE-DAP) mostly present on Gram-negative bacteria and only on some select Gram-positive bacteria, like Listeria and Bacillus species (65–67). Unlike NOD1, NOD2 expression is largely restricted to hematopoietic cells and certain specialized epithelial cells such as the small intestinal Paneth cells (68). NOD2 recognizes cytosolic muramyl dipeptide (MDP) found in the PGN of all bacteria (69). Besides providing immunity against intracellular bacteria, NODs were revealed to be critical for host defense against non-invasive Gram-negative bacteria like Helicobacter pylori, following delivery of its PGN into the host cells through the bacterial type IV secretion system (70). Moreover, NOD1 and NOD2 ligands were also described to gain access to the cytosol by endocytosis with the help of transporter proteins like SLC15A3 and SLC15A4 (71–73). Notably, NOD1 and NOD2 have been reported to localize to the plasma membrane at the sites of infection; however, the biological relevance of this translocation remains elusive (74, 75). Interestingly, a recent report accentuated the importance of NOD proteins in monitoring the activation state of small Rho GTPases (e.g., RAC1, CDC42, and RHOA) and inducing unusual immune responses in the host in response to bacterial infection (76). Upon activation by their cognate ligands both NOD1 and NOD2 self-oligomerize, undergo a conformational change, and through homotypic CARD–CARD interactions allow the recruitment of the CARD containing adaptor Receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIP2 or RIPK2) (41, 42, 77, 78) (Figure 2). This event facilitates the formation of a multi-protein signaling complex termed “Nodosome,” which leads to downstream NF-κB and MAPK-mediated inflammatory and anti-microbial output. Indeed, cells or mice lacking RIP2 do not respond to NOD agonists and fail to produce pro-inflammatory and anti-microbial molecules (78–80). Initially, it was thought that NOD oligomerization initiated RIP2 aggregation and activation by “induced proximity” (81). While this model still stands true, over the years new body of research has contributed a wealth of data regarding specific sequence of events that leads to RIP2 activation. In contrast to the earlier studies (82–85), recent in vitro data using pharmacological inhibitors as well as in vivo evidence using a knock-in mouse with kinase-dead RIP2 (K47A) have highlighted the key role of the kinase activity of RIP2 in NOD-mediated immune responses (86, 87).
Model of NOD1 and NOD2 signaling cascades. NOD1 and NOD2 recognize bacterial PGNs, iE-DAP, and MDP, respectively. Following ligand sensing the NODs recruit their common adaptor RIP2 by CARD–CARD interactions and induce RIP2 to undergo phosphorylation. The members of the TRAF family (TRAF2, TRAF5, and TRAF6), the IAP family (XIAP, cIAP1, and cIAP2), and the BCL2 family (BID) bind to RIP2 and facilitate its ubiquitination allowing the recruitment of TAK1 and ubiquitinated NEMO to the Nodosome. On one hand, NEMO instigates activation of the canonical NF-κB pathway by phosphorylating IKKα and IKKβ, by inducing IκBα phosphorylation and proteasomal degradation, and by freeing p50 and p65 NF-κB subunits. On the other hand, TAK1 recruits TAB1 and TAB2/3 inducing both (p38, ERK, and JNK) MAPK and NF-κB activation. Stimulation of both arms culminates in the induction of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs), cytokines, and chemokines. The formation of the Nodosome promotes autophagy and conversely, a fully functional autophagy machinery helps in signal transduction through the Nodosome. ATG16L1 along with ATG5 and ATG12 is required for autophagosome formation, however, independently of its autophagy functions, ATG16L1 negatively regulates NOD/RIP2 signaling.
Lately, it was described that the pathways activated downstream of NOD proteins are closely related to those activated by death receptors, notably TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1). For instance, hierarchical recruitment of selective TNFR-associated factors (TRAF2, TRAF5, or TRAF6) facilitates Lys63 poly-ubiquitination and activation of RIP2 (88–90). Activated RIP2 facilitates ubiquitination of NEMO (also called IKKγ) leading to the recruitment of tumor growth factor β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) and TAK1 binding proteins (TAB) 1, TAB2, or TAB3 (91, 92). Following this complex formation, IKKs (IKKα and IKKβ) get phosphorylated eventually driving the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα and subsequent transcription of NF-κB target genes (5, 89, 92) (Figure 2). RIP2 activation also constitutes a key event that links the NOD–RIP2 cascade with the p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) MAPK pathways (93).
In addition to TRAFs, members of the IAP family including X-linked IAP (XIAP) and cellular IAP1 (cIAP1) and cIAP2 were described to physically interact with RIP2 and facilitate NOD-mediated immunity (94–98). Both in vitro and in vivo studies suggest a strong role for cIAP1 and cIAP2 in promoting NOD signaling (Figure 2); however, the mechanism for such positive regulation is still not fully understood (94, 99–101). Similarly, XIAP was reported to recruit a linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) for RIP2 ubiquitination and this step was proven critical for downstream NF-κB regulation (96, 97). Upon microbial sensing another E3 ubiquitin ligase, ITCH, also ubiquitinates RIP2, and it is speculated that ITCH-mediated ubiquitination acts like a molecular switch dictating the fate of the signaling circuit to NF-κB or p38 and JNK activation (102). Pathogen-mediated NOD1 activation has also been shown to elicit protective immune responses via RIP2-TRAF3-IRF7-mediated transcription of IFNβ (79). Overall, it is tempting to speculate that similar to pro-survival association of RIP1 with cIAP1 and cIAP2 (103), interactions between RIP2 and the IAPs may also lead to modulation of cellular apoptosis. However, neither NODs nor RIP2 has been demonstrated to exploit these associations to affect cell survival. Similarly, several studies have alluded to NODs as being regulators of caspase-mediated apoptosis (82, 104, 105); yet, no direct link has so far been reported. Recently, the pro-apoptotic BH3 only BCL2 family protein BID (BH3 interacting-domain death agonist) was identified in a genome wide siRNA screen as a positive regulator of NOD signaling (101). BID was demonstrated to bind to RIP2 bridging both NOD and IKK complexes to specifically transduce NF-κB and ERK signaling events (101). Notably, BID was phosphorylated upon activation with NOD agonists and these innate immune functions of BID were found to be independent of its pro-apoptotic processing by caspase-8 (101). The discovery involving a classical pro-apoptotic protein, such as BID, in NOD–RIP2 signaling strengthens the concept that inflammatory and cell death pathways do not function as discrete mechanisms but share common adaptors. Such adaptors can exert multiple functions depending upon the nature of the stimuli (5, 106–108) (Figure 2). One recent study have reported that BID-deficient mice exhibit a normal NOD-mediated immunity (109), suggesting that further investigations are still needed to clearly decipher the implication of BID in NOD signaling.
Similar to NOD2, a SNP encoding a missense variant in the autophagy gene ATG16L1 was strongly associated with the incidence of CD, raising a possible common role of both genes in host defense mechanisms (110, 111). Intriguingly, it has been described that NOD1 and NOD2 stimulation enhances autophagy, either directly by interacting with ATG16L1 (112) or indirectly (112–115). Conversely, pharmacological inhibition of both early and late autophagy has been proven to down-regulate MDP-mediated NF-κB and MAPK activation, suggesting that autophagocytic trafficking of MDP may be required for efficient NOD2 signaling (114). Surprisingly, ATG16L1 was recently shown to negatively regulate NOD1- and NOD2-mediated inflammatory signaling by interfering with RIP2 ubiquitination and recruitment to the Nodosome (116) (Figure 2). Taken together, this information suggests that different NLRs can have opposing regulatory effects on autophagy and cell death, yet the molecular triggers that dictate these actions are not fully understood.
NOD Proteins and Cancer
Three mutations within the LRR region of the NOD2 gene have been associated with increased CD susceptibility. Interestingly, these same mutations have also been found to directly interfere with NOD2’s bacterial sensing faculties and downstream NF-κB activation (49, 50). Notably, such inactivation of NOD2 immunity has been indicated to enhance the risk of bacterial infections following chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (117). In addition, NOD2 polymorphisms have been correlated with modifications in gastric mucosa and increased risk for H. pylori induced gastric cancer (118). Apart from intestinal disorders, mutations in NOD2 have been linked with increased prevalence of early onset breast (119) and lung cancers (120, 121). However, how NOD2 contributes to the initiation and the progression of cancer remains ill defined. Although no mutations in the NOD1 gene have been so far associated with the incidence of intestinal inflammation or even colorectal cancer (CRC), murine models clearly designate a central anti-tumorigenic function for NOD1 in the pathophysiology of disease. For instance, Nod1−/− mice have been described to be susceptible to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS), a sulfated polysaccharide highly toxic to enterocytes (122). Upon combination of a single hit of the carcinogen, azoxymethane (AOM), with DSS (123), NOD1-deficient mice were found to develop significantly more and larger colonic tumors as compared to WT mice (122). This experimental CRC model is particularly applicable when the focus is on understanding colitis-driven tumor initiation and progression. The ApcMin/+ mouse is a N-Ethyl-N-Nitrosourea (ENU) mutant model carrying the multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min/+) mutation and recapitulates many aspects of human hereditary or sporadic CRCs with mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) gene (124–127). Intriguingly, it has been reported that treatment with low doses of DSS leads to increased colonic tumors in ApcMin/+Nod1−/−mice suggesting that NOD1 serves as a negative regulator of the tumor-promoting Wnt/β-catenin cascade (128, 129). Further analysis revealed that absence of NOD1 exacerbated NF-κB-mediated inflammation early during colitis causing gut barrier damage and prompted a second wave of microbiota driven inflammation and intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) proliferation, thus initiating tumor development. These conclusions are supported by the observation that antibiotic treatment of Nod1−/− mice ameliorated DSS-induced CRC (122). While most investigations have been focused on the role of NOD1 in models of intestinal tumorigenesis, one report provided experimental evidence for the protective role of NOD1 in breast cancer (104). Herein, it was shown that NOD1-deficient MCF-7 breast cancer cells were resistant to iE-DAP and cycloheximide mediated cell death. Interestingly, SCID mice grafted with NOD1 overexpressing cells exhibited rapid tumor regression. In sharp contrast, mice grafted with NOD1-deficient MCF-7 cells displayed increased and continued tumor growth (104).
Like Nod1−/− mice, NOD2-deficient mice have been revealed to be highly susceptible to DSS-induced colitis by inheritance of dysbiotic microbiota that markedly sensitizes mice to injury (130). Furthermore, Nod2−/− mice have been found to display worse disease outcome with increased epithelial dysplasia, heightened tumor burden, and elevated expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 when subjected to AOM–DSS treatment. This transmissible phenotype was significantly ameliorated upon treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics or using the neutralizing IL-6 receptor antibody (130). Altogether, these findings reinforce the idea that aberrant NOD signaling gives rise to dysbiosis that in an inflammatory setting ultimately causes mucosal injury and drives CRC. So far, the translational value of this knowledge is limited but with the recent technological advances in the microbiome research it is predicted that modulation of dysbiosis could be used as a therapeutic strategy for patients with CD as well as CRC.
Contrary to the protective role for NODs in intestinal tumorigenesis, increased expression of both NOD1 and NOD2 has been reported in the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma biopsies as compared to the healthy nasal biopsies. These findings implicate NODs in enhancing head and neck cancers; however, thus far no corroborating experimental evidence has been reported (131). Furthermore, iE-DAP stimulation of human pharyngeal squamous carcinoma cell lines (Detroit 562 and Fadu) has been determined to augment the production of β-defensins, which can serve as chemoattractants, thus fostering an inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic environment (131).
Inflammasome NLRs in CancerInflammasome NLRs: NLRP3-mediated signaling cascades
While NOD1 and NOD2 form the Nodosome, other NLRs assemble macromolecular inflammasome complexes. To date, various inflammasome platforms have been described (132), but the NLRP3 inflammasome is the most commonly studied. The reason behind this could be the initial discovery of mutations in the NLRP3 (CIAS1) gene implicating this PYD containing protein in both familial cold auto-inflammatory syndrome (FCAS) and Muckle–Wells Syndrome (MWS) (133). Thus, the NLRP3 inflammasome will be described here as a prototype for these NLRs (Figure 3). Classically, the inflammasome has been described to consist of an NLRP, the inflammatory protease caspase-1, and the apoptosis-associated speck like protein (ASC) (51). ASC contains an N-terminal PYD and a C-terminal CARD making it uniquely suited for bringing into close proximity the two key components, caspase-1 and NLRPs (134, 135). Upon activation, NLRP3 recruits ASC and caspase-1, which is a prerequisite for the cleavage and maturation of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 and consequent inflammatory cell death named pyroptosis (136–141). Lately, a more complex model for NLRP3-inflammasome activation has been proposed where two adaptors, ASC and mitochondrial MAVS, are required for optimal inflammasome triggering (142).
Simplified mechanisms for the canonical NLRP3- inflammasome activation. Various PAMPs and DAMPs provide the signal 2 required to assemble and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome comprised of NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1. Although the precise mechanism leading to NLRP3 activation is still controversial, it is speculated that K+ efflux may be the common cellular response that triggers inflammasome activation. However, this notion has not been fully verified and it is possible that an unidentified or intermediate adaptor may be required for transmitting signals between K+ efflux and the NLRP3 inflammasome. Crystals and particulate DAMPs enter the cell via endocytosis directly inducing K+ efflux and NLRP3-inflammasome formation. In addition, the endo- lysosomes carrying these DAMPs undergo lysosomal rupture and release cathepsin B, which acts as an intracellular DAMP and can induce K+ efflux. However, contradicting studies indicate that lysosomal rupture may cause K+ efflux and inflammasome activation even in the absence of cathepsin B. ATP binds to the P2X7 receptor on the cell membrane and causes opening of the PANX1 channels allowing K+ efflux and influx of any PAMPs and DAMPs present in the extracellular space. PAMPs such as pore-forming toxins activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and facilitate K+ efflux. Liposomes instigate Ca2+ influx through opening of the TRPM2 channels. Accumulation of excessive Ca2+ in the cytosol causes mitochondrial dysfunction and release of mtROS and oxidized mtDNA, which may activate the NLRP3 inflammasome either directly or by inducing K+ efflux. Clearance of distressed mitochondria by mitophagy serves to evade such inflammasome activation. Mitochondrial Cardiolipin binds to NLRP3 and is required for the NLRP3-inflammasome activation. Following NLRP3-inflammasome assembly, caspase-1 undergoes proximity driven proteolytic cleavage and further processes pro-IL-18 and pro-IL-1β into their mature active forms. Activation of the NLRP3-caspase-1 axis results in inflammation and pyroptotic cell death.
Owing to its widespread expression in numerous cell types such as neutrophils, monocytes, DCs, epithelial cells, and T cells (140, 143, 144), NLRP3 is exposed to a wide array of PAMPs and DAMPs that instigate the assembly and activation of the inflammasome [reviewed in Ref. (5, 132, 145–148)]. The NLRP3-inflammasome formation requires a two-step process (149). The priming step (or signal 1) involves TLR-NF-κB-driven induction of inflammasome components, as basal expression of NLRP3 in resting cells is insufficient for effective inflammasome activation (149, 150). However, certain cells like the human blood monocytes and murine macrophages appear to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in response to LPS stimulation alone (151, 152). It is noteworthy that a transcriptionally silent mechanism for TLR4-mediated inflammasome priming has been lately discovered (153, 154). This mechanism involves mitochondrial ROS (mtROS)-driven deubiquitination of NLRP3, suggesting that constitutive ubiquitination of NLRs may be a homeostatic mechanism to prevent overt inflammasome activity (154). The second activation step (or signal 2) promotes the NLRs to undergo homotypic oligomerization and assemble the inflammasome.
While several models have been proposed to define the signals behind NLRP3 activation, the precise mechanisms remain hitherto unresolved. Various bacterial pathogens induce potassium efflux and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome via the action of secreted pore-forming toxins (e.g., nigericin from Streptomyces hygroscopicus, listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes, pneumolysin from Streptococcus pneumoniiae, alpha-hemolysin, etc.) (138, 155, 156) (Figure 3). In addition, NLRP3 inflammasomes have been known to assemble in response to cytosolic bacterial and viral RNA both in vivo and in vitro (137, 157–160). Extracellular adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) released from dying or damaged cells also causes NLRP3-inflammasome activation through either paracrine or autocrine sensing of ATP by the purinergic receptor P2X7 (138, 161–163). Besides, it has been defined that ATP released from phagocytosed dying cells acts similarly on P2X7 and prompts pannexin-1 (PANX1) channels to open, thus resulting in potassium (K+) efflux and allowing other agonists to further engage and activate NLRP3 (164) (Figure 3).
Monosodium urate (MSU) and calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystals, alum, amyloid-β fibrils, as well as environmental pollutants like asbestos and silica strongly activate the NLRP3 inflammasome (139, 165–170). According to one model for this mode of activation, uptake of the crystalline and particulate matters into the cell causes lysosomal destabilization and release of cathepsin B, which is sensed by NLRP3 (168, 169). Interestingly, however, opposing results were obtained when cathepsin B-deficient BMMs were used to test this hypothesis, as no differences in IL-1β or caspase-1 cleavage were observed in response to several inflammasome activators such as hemozoin, MSU, or alum (171). Another model suggests that these activators prompt generation of mtROS and mitochondrial DNA, both of which are responsible for NLRP3-inflammasome activation (172–174). Evidently, pharmacological inhibition of mtROS production has been shown to prevent NLRP3-inflammasome formation indicating that ROS generation is an upstream event for NLRP3 activation (165, 166) (Figure 3). Liposomes have been found to induce mtROS and NLRP3-inflammasome activation by triggering calcium (Ca2+) influx via the transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2), although the exact mechanism linking ROS production to TRPM2 channel opening is still not well-characterized (175). On the other hand, the mitochondrial protein cardiolipin has been shown to directly bind and activate NLRP3 in a ROS-independent manner suggesting that ROS may not be the common denominator engaging the NLRP3 inflammasome (176). Recent advances have put forward additional mechanisms underlying NLRP3-inflammasome activation. In BMMs stimulated with PAMPs, extracellular calcium has been shown to activate the calcium sensing receptor (CASR) mediating signal transduction pathways that culminate in the release of calcium stores from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), eventually activating the NLRP3 inflammasome (177–179). The diverse nature of the NLRP3-inflammasome agonists allude to the likelihood that, instead of directly sensing PAMPs and DAMPs, NLRP3 may be activated by converging pathways with a final common ligand for NLRP3. Guanylate binding protein 5 (GBP5) has been recently proposed as one such component that directly participates in NLRP3-inflammasome activation; however, further investigation is needed to decipher how the GBP5 is activated and why it is required for select inflammasome assembly (180). Finally, studies by Munoz-Planillo et al. suggest that potassium efflux may perhaps be the sole intracellular event necessary for NLRP3 activation in response to a wide array of stimuli arguing for a unifying model for the NLRP3-inflammasome activation (181) (Figure 3).
Production of mtROS often culminates in mitophagy, an autophagic clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria. It has been demonstrated that inhibition of mitophagy enhances NLRP3-caspase-1-mediated secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 in response to LPS and ATP (172). In addition, deletion of ATG16L1 was found to promote IL-1β release in response to ATP, MSU, or LPS alone (182). Moreover, it has been recently suggested that autophagy may restrict NLRP3 activity by directly sequestering and targeting inflammasome components for degradation (183, 184). Overall, it is reasonable to speculate that autophagy could serve as a mechanism for preventing excessive NLRP3-inflammasome activation (172, 173, 183–185).
Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a central role in regulating the mechanisms involved in both inflammasome and apoptosis pathways. Loss of mitochondrial membrane potential is a pivotal event in intrinsic apoptosis and is tightly regulated by the BCL2 family of proteins through a system of checks and balances (30). Interestingly, anti-apoptotic BCL2 and BCL-XL proteins have been reported to directly interact with NLRP1 (CARD and PYD domain containing NLRP) to negatively regulate caspase-1 activation (186, 187). Similarly, BCL2 overexpression was shown to limit NLRP3-inflammasome activation (173, 174). In addition to BCL2 proteins, cIAP1, cIAP2, and XIAP have also been linked with inflammasome activation. Unlike their role in NOD signaling, initial studies have proposed that expression of these proteins might prevent caspase-1-dependent cell death (188). However, more recently cIAP1 and cIAP2 along with TRAF2 were found to enhance inflammasome activation seemingly by ubiquitinating and stabilizing caspase-1 and consequently prompting IL-1β release (189). In another report, genetic ablation of cIAP1 or cIAP2 had no effect on NLRP3-inflammasome activation, but concurrent pharmacological degradation of XIAP, cIAP1, and cIAP2 using SMAC mimetics was shown to limit caspase-1 activation (190). Interestingly, further inquiries revealed that in the absence of XIAP, cIAP1, and cIAP2, cell death in response to LPS was primarily incited by RIP3 activation causing NLRP3-caspase-1- as well as caspase-8-dependent IL-1β secretion (190). Lately, the concept of non-canonical inflammasome has been defined, which requires activation of caspase-11 in response to Gram-negative bacteria to facilitate either caspase-1-mediated IL-1β secretion or caspase-1-independent pyroptosis (191–194). Interestingly, apoptosis mediators FADD and caspase-8 have been involved in canonical and non-canonical NLRP3-inflammasome signaling. Indeed, FADD and caspase-8 facilitate the priming in “signal 1” by instigating both, LPS-TLR-MyD88-triggered induction of pro-IL-1β and NLRP3, as well as TLR-TRIF-mediated upregulation of pro-caspase-11 (195). Upon infection with Citrobacter rodentium or Escherichia coli, FADD and caspase-8 have been found to promote the “signal 2” by interacting with the NLRP3-inflammasome complex, thus influencing both canonical (caspase-1-dependent IL-1β maturation) and non-canonical (caspase-11-dependent pyropotosis) inflammasomes (194, 195). Conversely, it has been exhibited that caspase-8-deficient murine DCs are hyper-responsive to LPS-induced NLRP3-inflammasome assembly and activation (196). Overall, these studies place caspase-11 and caspase-8 at the center of inflammasome activation; however, a general lack of consensus in the field makes it hard to aptly judge their contribution in inflammasome-induced inflammation.
Inflammasome NLRs and Cancer
NLRP3, previously associated with rare and severe auto-inflammatory disorders, has been lately implicated in CD susceptibility and correlated with decreased NLRP3 expression and IL-1β production (62). Indeed, mice lacking NLRP3 have been shown to display exacerbated colonic inflammation upon DSS-induced colitis characterized by greater gut barrier damage, inflammatory immune cell infiltration, and cytokine production (197, 198). In accord, a central role has been ascribed for caspase-1 and ASC in intestinal epithelial repair after DSS-injury (199). Specifically, caspase-1, ASC, or NLRP3 deficiency in mice has been shown to be detrimental in DSS-induced intestinal inflammation, a mechanism attributed to the lack of IL-18 production by IECs (198, 199). Concomitantly, the increased colitogenic phenotype was completely reversed when mice were exogenously administered with the recombinant IL-18 cytokine (198, 199). The same lack of inflammatory regulation was found to render Nlrp3−/− and Casp1−/− mice more susceptible to AOM–DSS carcinogenesis (197, 200). The heightened tumor growth in the caspase-1 deficient mice was accompanied with drastically low levels of colonic IL-18. Overall, NLRP3 was shown to be important for IL-18 secretion, which in turn through IFNγ production induces STAT1 (Signal transducers and activators of transcription 1) phosphorylation and thus promotes an anti-tumorigenic environment (200). Moreover, it has been shown that Il18−/− or Il18r−/− mice are more susceptible to DSS-induced colitis and CRC, mimicking the increased tumor burdens observed in NLRP3 and caspase-1 deficient mice (201). Recent findings have put forward a novel concept for the dual function of IL-18 in intestinal inflammation and colitis-driven CRC (202, 203). For instance, during acute injury IEC-derived IL-18 triggers repair and restitution of the ulcerated epithelial barrier, whereas under chronic inflammatory settings the excessive release of IL-18 both from IECs and lamina propria macrophages and DCs is deleterious (203, 204). A protective role for NLRP3 has also been described in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (205). This correlation is primarily based on mRNA and protein expression data showing reduced levels of NLRP3 and other related inflammasome components seen in hepatic parenchymal cells derived from HCC tissue specimens as compared to non-cancerous liver sections (205). On the other hand, a gain of function SNP (Q705K) within the NLRP3 gene has been associated with increased mortality in CRC patients (206). Significantly, the same SNP was also found to be more prevalent in patients with malignant melanoma (207). Human monocytic THP-1 cells overexpressing a mutant variant of NLRP3 bearing the Q705K SNP have been reported to greatly respond to the inflammasome agonist alum and to trigger the production of IL-1β and IL-18, implying that overt NLRP3 activation could be detrimental for certain types of cancer (208). Similarly, another group implicated constitutive NLRP3-inflammasome signaling in the development and progression of melanomas (209).
Loss of function in the tumor suppressor gene p53 has been associated with a large number of sporadic cancers (36). One of the mechanisms for p53-induced clearance of potentially carcinogenic cells has been found to be via transcriptional up regulation of cell death activators (210). In light of this knowledge, the discovery of NLRC4 as a downstream transcriptional target of p53 was a promising evidence for the anti-tumorigenic functions of this NLR (211). Moreover, lack of NLRC4 inflammasome has been associated with the attenuation of p53-mediated cell death, indicative of a protective role of NLRC4 during tumor development (211). Several groups have investigated the role of NLRC4 in colitis and CRC. However, lack of consensus in the susceptibility of Nlrc4−/− mice to DSS as well as AOM–DSS treatment makes it difficult to gage the protective effect of NLRC4 in these models (197, 212). It has been demonstrated that mice deficient in NLRC4 develop higher tumor burdens than WT mice when subjected to DSS-induced CRC (212). In addition, bone marrow chimera experiments verified that NLRC4 expression within the radioresistant compartment was the major driver of CRC protection (212). Surprisingly, similar colitic phenotypes have been observed between WT and Nlrc4−/− mice following DSS administration, suggesting that tumor regulation by NLRC4 is mostly cell intrinsic and not through down-regulation of inflammation (213). Given the unique capacity of NLRC4 to sense and differentiate between commensal and pathogenic microbes in the gut (214), it is surprising that the tumor restraining roles of NLRC4 have been ruled to be independent of its immune regulatory functions. One unifying theory addressing these discrepancies could be that anti-tumor functions of NLRC4 are attributed to the cells of non-hematopoietic origin, whereas intestinal mononuclear phagocytes are the primary source of NLRC4 for microbial sensing and pathogen clearance (213, 214). Overall, these assumptions warrant deeper inquiries to clearly elucidate the mechanisms by which NLRC4 exerts protective functions during CRC and to decipher the relevance of p53-mediated role of NLRC4 in tumorigenesis.
Akin to NLRP3, both NLRP6 and NLRP12 have been recently described to use ASC-caspase-1 molecular platforms and assemble inflammasomes. A first hint of NLRP6 being an inflammasome NLR was gleaned from in vitro experiments showing increased caspase-1 cleavage when ASC and NLRP6 were co-expressed (215). Further in vivo evidence emphasized a protective role for NLRP6 in intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis as Nlrp6−/− mice showed high susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis and AOM–DSS-induced CRC (216–218). Unlike NLRC4, dampening of inflammation is purported to be one of the primary mechanisms for NLRP6-mediated protection and tissue homeostasis. NLRP6 has been shown to promote a gut microbiome that limits chronic inflammation. In fact, it has been evidenced that Nlrp6−/− mice display a distinct transmissible pro-colitogenic microbiome with increased prevalence of the bacterial genus Prevotellaceae (217). These mice presented a steady state colitic phenotype and an enhanced sensitivity to DSS colitis (217). Overall, a mechanism has been suggested wherein dysbiosis in the gut, caused by aberrant NLRP6 inflammasome signaling, drives excessive CCL5-mediated IL-6 production, barrier damage, and inflammation (217). In agreement with the findings in Casp1−/− mice (199), NLRP6-deficient mice had impaired IL-18 production mainly from the intestinal epithelial compartment further diminishing the capacity of these mice to recover from colitis. Likewise, overt inflammation and lack of IL-18 in the Nlrp6−/− mice has been associated with increased colonic tumor development (216), however, as seen for Nlrp3−/− mice it is still unknown whether administration of IL-18 is capable of rescuing the susceptibility phenotype. Interestingly, gene expression profiling of colorectal tumors derived from WT and Nlrp6−/− mice revealed an increased expression of paracrine factors of the Wnt and NOTCH signaling cascades, underscoring a novel function of NLRP6 in controlling intestinal proliferation (218). Sensing of damaged or dying cells by NLRP6 and NLRP3 inflammasomes has lately been hypothesized to prevent CRC through maintaining the balance between IL-22 and IL-22 binding protein (IL22-BP) (219). It has been speculated that sensing of DAMPs by both NLRs instigates IL-18-dependent down-regulation of the inhibitory molecule IL-22BP, thus allowing IL-22 to repair the injured tissue. However, dysregulated NLRP6 or NLRP3 signaling could potentially lead to inappropriate IL-22BP expression, thus creating a pro-tumorigenic environment caused by either excessive cell proliferation or lack of tissue repair (219). Although the dual function of IL-22 in CRC has been well-described, further experimental validation is needed to pinpoint the exact mode by which NLRP3 or NLRP6 regulate IL-22/IL-22BP ratio during colon tumorigenesis.
NLRP12 was originally defined as an inflammasome NLR due to its co-localization with ASC and caspase-1, induction of IL-1β and IL-18 secretion as well as NF-κB activation (220, 221). SNPs within the NLRP12 gene have been associated with increased susceptibility to atopic dermatitis and periodic fever syndromes accompanied mostly with caspase-1 activation and IL-1β release (222–225). It has been observed that NLRP12 can negatively regulate both canonical and non-canonical NF-κB pathways by targeting the IL-1R-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) and NF-κB inducing kinase (NIK) for proteasomal degradation (226–228). Two independent studies proposed that NLRP12 acts as a tumor suppressive molecule ex vivo and in in vivo animal models of colitis and colitis-induced CRC (229, 230). Mice lacking NLRP12 have been found to be more susceptible to DSS-injury with increased body weight loss, enhanced pathology scores coupled with massive infiltration of inflammatory cells and high inflammatory cytokine production (229, 230). Furthermore, AOM–DSS treatment of Nlrp12−/− mice has been shown to further provoke colonic tumor development and progression (229, 230). In the first study, it was clearly demonstrated that lack of NLRP12 increases NIK-dependent non-canonical NF-κB signaling and drives the regulation of cancer promoting genes like CXCL12 and CXCL13 (230). In the second report, the enhanced tumorigenicity in knockout mice was traced to excessive canonical NF-κB activation due to lack of NLRP12 in hematopoietic cells. Indeed, enhanced LPS-induced canonical NF-κB activation was exhibited in Nlrp12−/− macrophages ex vivo, suggesting that microbial sensing and negative regulation of inflammation may account for NLRP12-mediated tumor suppression (229). Altogether, these results underscore the importance of anti-inflammatory signals provided by NLRP12 in maintaining colonic homeostasis and protecting from colitis and colon tumorigenesis.
Therapeutic Strategies and Conclusion
It has been suggested that the strong immunomodulatory properties of NLRs could be exploited for mounting potent anti-tumorigenic responses. In fact, mice injected with B16 melanoma cells or EL4 thymoma cells expressing flagellin from Salmonella typhimurium were shown to display dramatic resistance to tumor establishment in NLRC4 dependent manner (231). In addition, immunization with flagellin expressing cancer cells lead to impressive antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses via NLRC4 and NAIP5 signaling and bestowed anti-tumor immunity against a secondary inoculation with tumor cells (231). Similarly, activation of NODs, in particular NOD2, to elicit robust cell-based anti-tumor immunity has been under scrutiny for several years. Indeed, instillation of MDP in patients with lung cancer has been reported to enhance expression of inflammatory cytokines and neutrophils in the pleural fluid (232). Relatedly, it has been suggested that the local immune-modulatory activity of MDP helps improve prognosis in hamsters suffering from osteosarcoma (233) and significantly reduces tumor metastasis in several murine cancer models, such as B16–BL6 melanoma, colon 26-M#1 carcinoma, and L5178Y-ML25T T lymphoma (234, 235).
Overt activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome has been demonstrated to elicit cancer progression. For instance, in mouse models of methylcholanthrene (MCA, a highly potent carcinogen) induced fibrosarcoma, NLRP3 was demonstrated to promote cancer progression. Moreover, NLRP3 expression in myeloid cells was shown to interfere with the suppression of cancer metastasis by inhibiting recruitment of anti-tumor NK cells to the site of carcinogenesis (236). Besides interfering with natural tumor control, NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β has been described to attenuate anti-tumor effects of chemotherapeutic agents, gemcitabine (Gem), and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (237). Mice lacking NLRP3 were far more receptive to thymoma regression upon treatment with Gem or 5FU as compared to WT mice. Furthermore, enhanced NLRP3-driven IL-1β release was linked with the induction of T helper 17 (Th17) cells that promoted chemo-resistance in WT mice (237). Keeping these observations in view, several studies support the use of specific inhibitors, antagonists, and monoclonal antibodies against components of the inflammasome, e.g., caspase-1, IL-1β, and IL-18, as therapeutic approaches beneficial for controlling inflammation and improving cancer prognosis (238).
An early phase clinical study suggests that administration of the IL-1R antagonist, Anakinra, alone or in combination with dexamethasone could potentially impede human multiple myeloma progression (239). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that IL-18 derived from tumor cells had the ability to subvert the NK cell-mediated tumor immunosurveillance and to promote tumor progression in a programed death receptor 1 (PD1)-dependent manner (240, 241). These findings suggest the potential of using IL-18 as well as PD1 neutralization for cancer immunotherapy. Overall, selective attenuation of the activities of certain NLRs could potentially boost regression and improve responsiveness to chemotherapy. The variability in NLRP3- and IL-18-mediated effects in different cancers highlights the complexity in NLR circuits and suggests that any broad implications regarding NLR intervention in tumorigenesis should be carefully investigated.
Microbial environment, diet, mouse strain, tumor ontogeny, etc. are all part of the complex network that dictates how an NLR influences inflammation and tumorigenesis. Sensitivity to these factors has lead to conflicting disease phenotypes in genetically modified mice lacking specific NLRs. Furthermore, NLR expression in hematopoietic or non-hematopoietic cellular compartments appears to have distinct influence on inflammatory regulation and tumorigenesis. Due to such discrepancies, it is still uncertain how dysregulation of these innate immune sensors incites inflammation that leads to carcinogenic transformation of cells. Although several mechanisms have been suggested like control of NF-κB signaling, regulation of tissue repair factors, and IL-18 secretion, no unifying hypothesis exists. In addition, interaction of NLRs with different members of the TNFR pathway, BCL2 family of proteins, IAPs, apoptotic caspases, and autophagy regulators point toward more intricate mechanisms for NLR regulation than currently acknowledged. Future studies focusing on the biochemistry of interactions between cell death regulators and NLRs are required to delineate the co-integration of NLR-cell death mechanisms so as to facilitate implementation of NLR modifying therapeutic strategies for inflammatory diseases and cancer.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank all the Yeretssian lab members for the insightful and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Helmsley Foundation.
ReferencesJanewayCAJrMedzhitovR. Innate immune recognition. Annu Rev Immunol (2002) 20:197–216.10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.08435911861602BianchiME. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J Leukoc Biol (2007) 81:1–5.10.1189/jlb.030616417032697KawaiTAkiraS. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity (2011) 34:637–50.10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.00621616434HansenJDVojtechLNLaingKJ. Sensing disease and danger: a survey of vertebrate PRRs and their origins. Dev Comp Immunol (2011) 35:886–97.10.1016/j.dci.2011.01.00821241729YeretssianG. Effector functions of NLRs in the intestine: innate sensing, cell death, and disease. Immunol Res (2012) 54:25–36.10.1007/s12026-012-8317-322454103WenHMiaoEATingJP. Mechanisms of NOD-like receptor-associated inflammasome activation. Immunity (2013) 39:432–41.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.037GoubauDDeddoucheSReisESousaC. Cytosolic sensing of viruses. Immunity (2013) 38:855–69.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.007HardisonSEBrownGD. C-type lectin receptors orchestrate antifungal immunity. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:817–22.10.1038/ni.236922910394RatsimandresyRADorfleutnerAStehlikC. An update on PYRIN domain-containing pattern recognition receptors: from immunity to pathology. Front Immunol (2013) 4:440.10.3389/fimmu.2013.0044024367371JanowskiAMKolbRZhangWSutterwalaFS. Beneficial and detrimental roles of NLRs in carcinogenesis. Front Immunol (2013) 4:370.10.3389/fimmu.2013.0037024273542BalkwillFMantovaniA. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?Lancet (2001) 357:539–45.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-011229684MantovaniAAllavenaPSicaABalkwillF. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature (2008) 454:436–44.10.1038/nature0720518650914GrivennikovSIGretenFRKarinM. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell (2010) 140:883–99.10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025de MartelCFranceschiS. Infections and cancer: established associations and new hypotheses. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2009) 70:183–94.10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.07.02118805702TakahashiHOgataHNishigakiRBroideDHKarinM. Tobacco smoke promotes lung tumorigenesis by triggering IKKbeta- and JNK1-dependent inflammation. Cancer Cell (2010) 17:89–97.10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.00820129250KhasawnehJSchulzMDWalchARozmanJHrabe De AngelisMKlingensporMInflammation and mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation link obesity to early tumor promotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106:3354–9.10.1073/pnas.080286410619208810ParkEJLeeJHYuGYHeGAliSRHolzerRGDietary and genetic obesity promote liver inflammation and tumorigenesis by enhancing IL-6 and TNF expression. Cell (2010) 140:197–208.10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.05220141834ErshlerWBKellerET. Age-associated increased interleukin-6 gene expression, late-life diseases, and frailty. Annu Rev Med (2000) 51:245–70.10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.24510774463RodierFCoppeJPPatilCKHoeijmakersWAMunozDPRazaSRPersistent DNA damage signalling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion. Nat Cell Biol (2009) 11:973–9.10.1038/ncb190919597488CoussensLMWerbZ. Inflammation and cancer. Nature (2002) 420:860–7.10.1038/nature0132212490959EaswaranHTsaiHCBaylinSB. Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol Cell (2014) 54:716–27.10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.01524905005HanahanDWeinbergRA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell (2011) 144:646–74.10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013StrasserACorySAdamsJM. Deciphering the rules of programmed cell death to improve therapy of cancer and other diseases. EMBO J (2011) 30:3667–83.10.1038/emboj.2011.30721863020BaiLSmithDCWangS. Small-molecule SMAC mimetics as new cancer therapeutics. Pharmacol Ther (2014).10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.05.00724841289SuzukiYNakabayashiYNakataKReedJCTakahashiR. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) inhibits caspase-3 and -7 in distinct modes. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:27058–63.10.1074/jbc.M10241520011359776BuscaASaxenaMKryworuchkoMKumarA. Anti-apoptotic genes in the survival of monocytic cells during infection. Curr Genomics (2009) 10:306–17.10.2174/13892020978892096720119528Gyrd-HansenMMeierP. IAPs: from caspase inhibitors to modulators of NF-kappaB, inflammation and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer (2010) 10:561–74.10.1038/nrc288920651737SaxenaMBuscaAPandeySKryworuchkoMKumarA. CpG protects human monocytic cells against HIV-Vpr-induced apoptosis by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis-2 through the calcium-activated JNK pathway in a TLR9-independent manner. J Immunol (2011) 187:5865–78.10.4049/jimmunol.110011522068233BuscaASaxenaMKumarA. Critical role for antiapoptotic Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 in human macrophage survival and cellular IAP1/2 (cIAP1/2) in resistance to HIV-Vpr-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem (2012) 287:15118–33.10.1074/jbc.M111.31266022403404YouleRJStrasserA. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2008) 9:47–59.10.1038/nrm230818097445KellyPNStrasserA. The role of Bcl-2 and its pro-survival relatives in tumourigenesis and cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ (2011) 18:1414–24.10.1038/cdd.2011.1721415859SaxJKFeiPMurphyMEBernhardEKorsmeyerSJEl-DeiryWS. BID regulation by p53 contributes to chemosensitivity. Nat Cell Biol (2002) 4:842–9.10.1038/ncb86612402042MichalakEMJansenESHappoLCraggMSTaiLSmythGKPuma and to a lesser extent Noxa are suppressors of Myc-induced lymphomagenesis. Cell Death Differ (2009) 16:684–96.10.1038/cdd.2008.19519148184DonehowerLAHarveyMSlagleBLMcarthurMJMontgomeryCAJrButelJSMice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours. Nature (1992) 356:215–21.10.1038/356215a0OlivierMHollsteinMHainautP. TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol (2010) 2:a001008.10.1101/cshperspect.a00100820182602BiegingKTMelloSSAttardiLD. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer (2014) 14:359–70.10.1038/nrc371124739573HagerKMGuW. Understanding the non-canonical pathways involved in p53-mediated tumor suppression. Carcinogenesis (2014) 35:740–6.10.1093/carcin/bgt48724381013ChretienASLe RoyAVeyNPrebetTBlaiseDFauriatCCancer-induced alterations of NK-mediated target recognition: current and investigational pharmacological strategies aiming at restoring NK-mediated anti-tumor activity. Front Immunol (2014) 5:122.10.3389/fimmu.2014.0012224715892VivierEUgoliniSBlaiseDChabannonCBrossayL. Targeting natural killer cells and natural killer T cells in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol (2012) 12:239–52.10.1038/nri317422437937BertinJNirWJFischerCMTayberOVErradaPRGrantJRHuman CARD4 protein is a novel CED-4/Apaf-1 cell death family member that activates NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem (1999) 274:12955–8.10.1074/jbc.274.19.1295510224040InoharaNKosekiTDel PesoLHuYYeeCChenSNod1, an Apaf-1-like activator of caspase-9 and nuclear factor-kappaB. J Biol Chem (1999) 274:14560–7.10.1074/jbc.274.21.1456010329646OguraYInoharaNBenitoAChenFFYamaokaSNunezG. Nod2, a Nod1/Apaf-1 family member that is restricted to monocytes and activates NF-kappaB. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:4812–8.10.1074/jbc.M00807220011087742TingJPLoveringRCAlnemriESBertinJBossJMDavisBKThe NLR gene family: a standard nomenclature. Immunity (2008) 28:285–7.10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.005NickersonKSiskTJInoharaNYeeCSKennellJChoMCDendritic cell-specific MHC class II transactivator contains a caspase recruitment domain that confers potent transactivation activity. J Biol Chem (2001) 276:19089–93.10.1074/jbc.M10129520011279191DiezELeeSHGauthierSYaraghiZTremblayMVidalSBirc1e is the gene within the Lgn1 locus associated with resistance to Legionella pneumophila. Nat Genet (2003) 33:55–60.10.1038/ng106512483212WrightEKGoodartSAGrowneyJDHadinotoVEndrizziMGLongEMNaip5 affects host susceptibility to the intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila. Curr Biol (2003) 13:27–36.10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01359-312526741LightfieldKLPerssonJBrubakerSWWitteCEVon MoltkeJDunipaceEACritical function for Naip5 in inflammasome activation by a conserved carboxy-terminal domain of flagellin. Nat Immunol (2008) 9:1171–8.10.1038/ni.164618724372PhilpottDJSorbaraMTRobertsonSJCroitoruKGirardinSE. NOD proteins: regulators of inflammation in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol (2014) 14:9–23.10.1038/nri356524336102HugotJPChamaillardMZoualiHLesageSCezardJPBelaicheJAssociation of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature (2001) 411:599–603.10.1038/3507910711385576OguraYBonenDKInoharaNNicolaeDLChenFFRamosRA frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature (2001) 411:603–6.10.1038/3507911411385577MartinonFBurnsKTschoppJ. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell (2002) 10:417–26.10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00599-312191486MooreCBBergstralhDTDuncanJALeiYMorrisonTEZimmermannAGNLRX1 is a regulator of mitochondrial antiviral immunity. Nature (2008) 451:573–7.10.1038/nature06501AllenICMooreCBSchneiderMLeiYDavisBKScullMANLRX1 protein attenuates inflammatory responses to infection by interfering with the RIG-I-MAVS and TRAF6-NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Immunity (2011) 34:854–65.10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.02621703540XiaXCuiJWangHYZhuLMatsuedaSWangQNLRX1 negatively regulates TLR-induced NF-kappaB signaling by targeting TRAF6 and IKK. Immunity (2011) 34:843–53.10.1016/j.immuni.2011.02.02221703539LeiYWenHYuYTaxmanDJZhangLWidmanDGThe mitochondrial proteins NLRX1 and TUFM form a complex that regulates type I interferon and autophagy. Immunity (2012) 36:933–46.10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.02522749352LeiYWenHTingJP. The NLR protein, NLRX1, and its partner, TUFM, reduce type I interferon, and enhance autophagy. Autophagy (2013) 9:432–3.10.4161/auto.2302623321557TattoliICarneiroLAJehannoMMagalhaesJGShuYPhilpottDJNLRX1 is a mitochondrial NOD-like receptor that amplifies NF-kappaB and JNK pathways by inducing reactive oxygen species production. EMBO Rep (2008) 9:293–300.10.1038/sj.embor.740116118219313Abdul-SaterAASaid-SadierNLamVMSinghBPettengillMASoaresFEnhancement of reactive oxygen species production and chlamydial infection by the mitochondrial Nod-like family member NLRX1. J Biol Chem (2010) 285:41637–45.10.1074/jbc.M110.13788520959452SoaresFTattoliIWortzmanMEArnoultDPhilpottDJGirardinSE. NLRX1 does not inhibit MAVS-dependent antiviral signalling. Innate Immun (2013) 19:438–48.10.1177/175342591246738323212541RebsamenMVazquezJTardivelAGuardaGCurranJTschoppJ. NLRX1/NOD5 deficiency does not affect MAVS signalling. Cell Death Differ (2011) 18:1387.10.1038/cdd.2011.64FranchiLMunoz-PlanilloRNunezG. Sensing and reacting to microbes through the inflammasomes. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:325–32.10.1038/ni.223122430785VillaniACLemireMFortinGLouisESilverbergMSColletteCCommon variants in the NLRP3 region contribute to Crohn’s disease susceptibility. Nat Genet (2009) 41:71–6.10.1038/ng.28519098911KutikhinAG. Role of NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms in cancer etiology. Hum Immunol (2011) 72:955–68.10.1016/j.humimm.2011.06.00321745515JostinsLRipkeSWeersmaRKDuerrRHMcgovernDPHuiKYHost-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature (2012) 491:119–24.10.1038/nature1158223128233ChamaillardMHashimotoMHorieYMasumotoJQiuSSaabLAn essential role for NOD1 in host recognition of bacterial peptidoglycan containing diaminopimelic acid. Nat Immunol (2003) 4:702–7.10.1038/ni94512796777GirardinSEBonecaIGCarneiroLAAntignacAJehannoMVialaJNod1 detects a unique muropeptide from gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycan. Science (2003) 300:1584–7.10.1126/science.108467712791997GirardinSETravassosLHHerveMBlanotDBonecaIGPhilpottDJPeptidoglycan molecular requirements allowing detection by Nod1 and Nod2. J Biol Chem (2003) 278:41702–8.10.1074/jbc.M30719820012871942OguraYLalaSXinWSmithEDowdsTAChenFFExpression of NOD2 in Paneth cells: a possible link to Crohn’s ileitis. Gut (2003) 52:1591–7.10.1136/gut.52.11.159114570728GirardinSEBonecaIGVialaJChamaillardMLabigneAThomasGNod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection. J Biol Chem (2003) 278:8869–72.10.1074/jbc.C20065120012527755VialaJChaputCBonecaIGCardonaAGirardinSEMoranAPNod1 responds to peptidoglycan delivered by the Helicobacter pylori cag pathogenicity island. Nat Immunol (2004) 5:1166–74.10.1038/ni113115489856LeeJTattoliIWojtalKAVavrickaSRPhilpottDJGirardinSE. pH-dependent internalization of muramyl peptides from early endosomes enables Nod1 and Nod2 signaling. J Biol Chem (2009) 284:23818–29.10.1074/jbc.M109.03367019570976Marina-GarciaNFranchiLKimYGHuYSmithDEBoonsGJClathrin- and dynamin-dependent endocytic pathway regulates muramyl dipeptide internalization and NOD2 activation. J Immunol (2009) 182:4321–7.10.4049/jimmunol.080219719299732NakamuraNLillJRPhungQJiangZBakalarskiCDe MaziereAEndosomes are specialized platforms for bacterial sensing and NOD2 signalling. Nature (2014) 509:240–4.10.1038/nature1313324695226FukazawaAAlonsoCKurachiKGuptaSLesserCFMccormickBAGEF-H1 mediated control of NOD1 dependent NF-kappaB activation by Shigella effectors. PLoS Pathog (2008) 4:e1000228.10.1371/journal.ppat.100022819043560KuferTAKremmerEAdamACPhilpottDJSansonettiPJ. The pattern-recognition molecule Nod1 is localized at the plasma membrane at sites of bacterial interaction. Cell Microbiol (2008) 10:477–86.17970764KeestraAMWinterMGAuburgerJJFrassleSPXavierMNWinterSEManipulation of small Rho GTPases is a pathogen-induced process detected by NOD1. Nature (2013) 496:233–7.10.1038/nature1202523542589ChinAIDempseyPWBruhnKMillerJFXuYChengG. Involvement of receptor-interacting protein 2 in innate and adaptive immune responses. Nature (2002) 416:190–4.10.1038/416190a11894097ParkJHKimYGMcdonaldCKannegantiTDHasegawaMBody-MalapelMRICK/RIP2 mediates innate immune responses induced through Nod1 and Nod2 but not TLRs. J Immunol (2007) 178:2380–6.10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.238017277144WatanabeTAsanoNFichtner-FeiglSGorelickPLTsujiYMatsumotoYNOD1 contributes to mouse host defense against Helicobacter pylori via induction of type I IFN and activation of the ISGF3 signaling pathway. J Clin Invest (2010) 120:1645–62.10.1172/JCI3948120389019MagalhaesJGLeeJGeddesKRubinoSPhilpottDJGirardinSE. Essential role of Rip2 in the modulation of innate and adaptive immunity triggered by Nod1 and Nod2 ligands. Eur J Immunol (2011) 41:1445–55.10.1002/eji.20104082721469090InoharaNKosekiTLinJDel PesoLLucasPCChenFFAn induced proximity model for NF-kappa B activation in the Nod1/RICK and RIP signaling pathways. J Biol Chem (2000) 275:27823–31.10880512InoharaNDel PesoLKosekiTChenSNunezG. RICK, a novel protein kinase containing a caspase recruitment domain, interacts with CLARP and regulates CD95-mediated apoptosis. J Biol Chem (1998) 273:12296–300.10.1074/jbc.273.20.122969575181McCarthyJVNiJDixitVM. RIP2 is a novel NF-kappaB-activating and cell death-inducing kinase. J Biol Chem (1998) 273:16968–75.10.1074/jbc.273.27.169689642260ThomeMHofmannKBurnsKMartinonFBodmerJLMattmannCIdentification of CARDIAK, a RIP-like kinase that associates with caspase-1. Curr Biol (1998) 8:885–8.10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00352-19705938EickhoffJHankeMStein-GerlachMKiangTPHerzbergerKHabenbergerPRICK activates a NF-kappaB-dependent anti-human cytomegalovirus response. J Biol Chem (2004) 279:9642–52.10.1074/jbc.M31289320014670961WindheimMLangCPeggieMPlaterLACohenP. Molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of cytokine production by muramyl dipeptide. Biochem J (2007) 404:179–90.10.1042/BJ2006170417348859NembriniCKisielowJShamshievATTortolaLCoyleAJKopfMThe kinase activity of Rip2 determines its stability and consequently Nod1- and Nod2-mediated immune responses. J Biol Chem (2009) 284:19183–8.10.1074/jbc.M109.00635319473975YangYYinCPandeyAAbbottDSassettiCKelliherMA. NOD2 pathway activation by MDP or Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection involves the stable polyubiquitination of Rip2. J Biol Chem (2007) 282:36223–9.10.1074/jbc.M70307920017947236HasegawaMFujimotoYLucasPCNakanoHFukaseKNunezGA critical role of RICK/RIP2 polyubiquitination in Nod-induced NF-kappaB activation. EMBO J (2008) 27:373–83.10.1038/sj.emboj.760196218079694Tigno-AranjuezJTAsaraJMAbbottDW. Inhibition of RIP2’s tyrosine kinase activity limits NOD2-driven cytokine responses. Genes Dev (2010) 24:2666–77.10.1101/gad.196441021123652AbbottDWWilkinsAAsaraJMCantleyLC. The Crohn’s disease protein, NOD2, requires RIP2 in order to induce ubiquitinylation of a novel site on NEMO. Curr Biol (2004) 14:2217–27.10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.03215620648AbbottDWYangYHuttiJEMadhavarapuSKelliherMACantleyLC. Coordinated regulation of Toll-like receptor and NOD2 signaling by K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Mol Cell Biol (2007) 27:6012–25.10.1128/MCB.00270-0717562858NavasTABaldwinDTStewartTA. RIP2 is a Raf1-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. J Biol Chem (1999) 274:33684–90.10.1074/jbc.274.47.3368410559258BertrandMJDoironKLabbeKKornelukRGBarkerPASalehM. Cellular inhibitors of apoptosis cIAP1 and cIAP2 are required for innate immunity signaling by the pattern recognition receptors NOD1 and NOD2. Immunity (2009) 30:789–801.10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.01119464198KriegACorreaRGGarrisonJBLe NegrateGWelshKHuangZXIAP mediates NOD signaling via interaction with RIP2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106:14524–9.10.1073/pnas.090713110619667203DamgaardRBNachburUYabalMWongWWFiilBKKastirrMThe ubiquitin ligase XIAP recruits LUBAC for NOD2 signaling in inflammation and innate immunity. Mol Cell (2012) 46:746–58.10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.01422607974TokunagaFIwaiK. Linear ubiquitination: a novel NF-kappaB regulatory mechanism for inflammatory and immune responses by the LUBAC ubiquitin ligase complex. Endocr J (2012) 59:641–52.10.1507/endocrj.EJ12-014822673407DamgaardRBFiilBKSpeckmannCYabalMZur StadtUBekker-JensenSDisease-causing mutations in the XIAP BIR2 domain impair NOD2-dependent immune signalling. EMBO Mol Med (2013) 5:1278–95.10.1002/emmm.20130309023818254WatanabeTAsanoNMurrayPJOzatoKTailorPFussIJMuramyl dipeptide activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 protects mice from experimental colitis. J Clin Invest (2008) 118:545–59.10.1172/JCI3314518188453ReardonCMakTW. cIAP proteins: keystones in NOD receptor signal transduction. Immunity (2009) 30:755–6.10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.00519538923YeretssianGCorreaRGDoironKFitzgeraldPDillonCPGreenDRNon-apoptotic role of BID in inflammation and innate immunity. Nature (2011) 474:96–9.10.1038/nature0998221552281TaoMScacheriPCMarinisJMHarhajEWMatesicLEAbbottDW. ITCH K63-ubiquitinates the NOD2 binding protein, RIP2, to influence inflammatory signaling pathways. Curr Biol (2009) 19:1255–63.10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.03819592251BertrandMJMilutinovicSDicksonKMHoWCBoudreaultADurkinJcIAP1 and cIAP2 facilitate cancer cell survival by functioning as E3 ligases that promote RIP1 ubiquitination. Mol Cell (2008) 30:689–700.10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.01418570872da Silva CorreiaJMirandaYAustin-BrownNHsuJMathisonJXiangRNod1-dependent control of tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2006) 103:1840–5.10.1073/pnas.0509228103da Silva CorreiaJMirandaYLeonardNHsuJUlevitchRJ. Regulation of Nod1-mediated signaling pathways. Cell Death Differ (2007) 14:830–9.10.1038/sj.cdd.4402070YeretssianGLabbeKSalehM. Molecular regulation of inflammation and cell death. Cytokine (2008) 43:380–90.10.1016/j.cyto.2008.07.01518703350GalluzziLKeppOTrojel-HansenCKroemerG. Non-apoptotic functions of apoptosis-regulatory proteins. EMBO Rep (2012) 13:322–30.10.1038/embor.2012.1922402666YeretssianGCorreaRGDoironKFitzgeraldPDillonCPGreenDRIs BID required for NOD signalling? reply. Nature (2012) 488:E6–8.10.1038/nature11367NachburUVinceJEO’ReillyLAStrasserASilkeJ. Is BID required for NOD signalling?Nature (2012) 488:E4–6.10.1038/nature11366HampeJFrankeARosenstielPTillATeuberMHuseKA genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nat Genet (2007) 39:207–11.10.1038/ng195417200669RiouxJDXavierRJTaylorKDSilverbergMSGoyettePHuettAGenome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis. Nat Genet (2007) 39:596–604.10.1038/ng203217435756TravassosLHCarneiroLARamjeetMHusseySKimYGMagalhaesJGNod1 and Nod2 direct autophagy by recruiting ATG16L1 to the plasma membrane at the site of bacterial entry. Nat Immunol (2010) 11:55–62.10.1038/ni.182319898471CooneyRBakerJBrainODanisBPichulikTAllanPNOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat Med (2010) 16:90–7.10.1038/nm.206919966812HomerCRRichmondALRebertNAAchkarJPMcdonaldC. ATG16L1 and NOD2 interact in an autophagy-dependent antibacterial pathway implicated in Crohn’s disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology (2010) 139:1630–41.10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.00620637199HomerCRKabiAMarina-GarciaNSreekumarANesvizhskiiAINickersonKPA dual role for receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIP2) kinase activity in nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2)-dependent autophagy. J Biol Chem (2012) 287:25565–76.10.1074/jbc.M111.32683522665475SorbaraMTEllisonLKRamjeetMTravassosLHJonesNLGirardinSEThe protein ATG16L1 suppresses inflammatory cytokines induced by the intracellular sensors Nod1 and Nod2 in an autophagy-independent manner. Immunity (2013) 39:858–73.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.01324238340YomadeOSpies-WeisshartBGlaserASchnetzkeUHochhausASchollS. Impact of NOD2 polymorphisms on infectious complications following chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Ann Hematol (2013) 92:1071–7.10.1007/s00277-013-1734-023558906HnatyszynASzalataMStanczykJCichyWSlomskiR. Association of c.802C >T polymorphism of NOD2/CARD15 gene with the chronic gastritis and predisposition to cancer in H. pylori infected patients. Exp Mol Pathol (2010) 88:388–93.10.1016/j.yexmp.2010.03.00320230816HuzarskiTLenerMDomagalaWGronwaldJByrskiTKurzawskiGThe 3020insC allele of NOD2 predisposes to early-onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2005) 89:91–3.10.1007/s10549-004-1250-y15666202LenerMROszutowskaDCastanedaJKurzawskiGSuchyJNej-WolosiakKPrevalence of the NOD2 3020insC mutation in aggregations of breast and lung cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2006) 95:141–5.10.1007/s10549-005-9057-z16267612RigoliLDi BellaCFedeleFProcopioVAmoriniMLo GiudiceGTLR4 and NOD2/CARD15 genetic polymorphisms and their possible role in gastric carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res (2010) 30:513–7.20332463ChenGYShawMHRedondoGNunezG. The innate immune receptor Nod1 protects the intestine from inflammation-induced tumorigenesis. Cancer Res (2008) 68:10060–7.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-206119074871TanakaTKohnoHSuzukiRYamadaYSugieSMoriH. A novel inflammation-related mouse colon carcinogenesis model induced by azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate. Cancer Sci (2003) 94:965–73.10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01386.x14611673MoserARPitotHCDoveWF. A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse. Science (1990) 247:322–4.10.1126/science.22967222296722ItzkowitzS. Colon carcinogenesis in inflammatory bowel disease: applying molecular genetics to clinical practice. J Clin Gastroenterol (2003) 36:S70–4.10.1097/00004836-200305001-0001212702969SalingerAPJusticeMJ. Mouse mutagenesis using N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). CSH Protoc (2008) 2008:pdb.prot4985.10.1101/pdb.prot4985NassiriMKooshyarMMRoudbarZMahdaviMDoostiM. Genes and SNPs associated with non-hereditary and hereditary colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev (2013) 14:5609–14.10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.10.560924289550MaruyamaKOchiaiAAkimotoSNakamuraSBabaSMoriyaYCytoplasmic beta-catenin accumulation as a predictor of hematogenous metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Oncology (2000) 59:302–9.10.1159/00001218711096342YamadaYMoriH. Multistep carcinogenesis of the colon in Apc(Min/+) mouse. Cancer Sci (2007) 98:6–10.10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00348.x17052257Couturier-MaillardASecherTRehmanANormandSDe ArcangelisAHaeslerRNOD2-mediated dysbiosis predisposes mice to transmissible colitis and colorectal cancer. J Clin Invest (2013) 123:700–11.10.1172/JCI6223623281400MillrudCRKvarnhammarAMTajtiJMunck-WiklandEUddmanRCardellLO. Nod-like receptors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol (2013) 133:1333–44.10.3109/00016489.2013.83147624053487SchroderKTschoppJ. The inflammasomes. Cell (2010) 140:821–32.10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.040HoffmanHMMuellerJLBroideDHWandererAAKolodnerRD. Mutation of a new gene encoding a putative pyrin-like protein causes familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome and Muckle-Wells syndrome. Nat Genet (2001) 29:301–5.10.1038/ng75611687797MariathasanSNewtonKMonackDMVucicDFrenchDMLeeWPDifferential activation of the inflammasome by caspase-1 adaptors ASC and Ipaf. Nature (2004) 430:213–8.10.1038/nature0266415190255MariathasanSMonackDM. Inflammasome adaptors and sensors: intracellular regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol (2007) 7:31–40.10.1038/nri199717186029AgostiniLMartinonFBurnsKMcdermottMFHawkinsPNTschoppJ. NALP3 forms an IL-1beta-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity (2004) 20:319–25.10.1016/S1074-7613(04)00046-915030775KannegantiTDOzorenNBody-MalapelMAmerAParkJHFranchiLBacterial RNA and small antiviral compounds activate caspase-1 through cryopyrin/Nalp3. Nature (2006) 440:233–6.10.1038/nature0451716407888MariathasanSWeissDSNewtonKMcbrideJO’RourkeKRoose-GirmaMCryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature (2006) 440:228–32.10.1038/nature0451516407890MartinonFPetrilliVMayorATardivelATschoppJ. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature (2006) 440:237–41.10.1038/nature0451616407889SutterwalaFSOguraYSzczepanikMLara-TejeroMLichtenbergerGSGrantEPCritical role for NALP3/CIAS1/Cryopyrin in innate and adaptive immunity through its regulation of caspase-1. Immunity (2006) 24:317–27.10.1016/j.immuni.2006.02.00416546100BergsbakenTFinkSLCooksonBT. Pyroptosis: host cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Microbiol (2009) 7:99–109.10.1038/nrmicro2070SubramanianNNatarajanKClatworthyMRWangZGermainRN. The adaptor MAVS promotes NLRP3 mitochondrial localization and inflammasome activation. Cell (2013) 153:348–61.10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.05423582325KummerJABroekhuizenREverettHAgostiniLKuijkLMartinonFInflammasome components NALP 1 and 3 show distinct but separate expression profiles in human tissues suggesting a site-specific role in the inflammatory response. J Histochem Cytochem (2007) 55:443–52.10.1369/jhc.6A7101.200617164409GuardaGZengerMYazdiASSchroderKFerreroIMenuPDifferential expression of NLRP3 among hematopoietic cells. J Immunol (2011) 186:2529–34.10.4049/jimmunol.100272021257968DavisBKWenHTingJP. The inflammasome NLRs in immunity, inflammation, and associated diseases. Annu Rev Immunol (2011) 29:707–35.10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101405LamkanfiMDixitVM. Inflammasomes and their roles in health and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol (2012) 28:137–61.10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155745MunizLRKnospCYeretssianG. Intestinal antimicrobial peptides during homeostasis, infection, and disease. Front Immunol (2012) 3:310.10.3389/fimmu.2012.0031023087688LatzEXiaoTSStutzA. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat Rev Immunol (2013) 13:397–411.10.1038/nri3452BauernfeindFGHorvathGStutzAAlnemriESMacdonaldKSpeertDCutting edge: NF-kappaB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J Immunol (2009) 183:787–91.10.4049/jimmunol.090136319570822GhonimeMGShamaaORDasSEldomanyRAFernandes-AlnemriTAlnemriESInflammasome priming by lipopolysaccharide is dependent upon ERK signaling and proteasome function. J Immunol (2014) 192:3881–8.10.4049/jimmunol.130197424623131SchumannRRBelkaCReuterDLampingNKirschningCJWeberJRLipopolysaccharide activates caspase-1 (interleukin-1-converting enzyme) in cultured monocytic and endothelial cells. Blood (1998) 91:577–84.9427712NeteaMGNold-PetryCANoldMFJoostenLAOpitzBVan Der MeerJHDifferential requirement for the activation of the inflammasome for processing and release of IL-1beta in monocytes and macrophages. Blood (2009) 113:2324–35.10.1182/blood-2008-03-14672019104081BauernfeindFBartokERiegerAFranchiLNunezGHornungV. Cutting edge: reactive oxygen species inhibitors block priming, but not activation, of the NLRP3 inflammasome. J Immunol (2011) 187:613–7.10.4049/jimmunol.110061321677136JulianaCFernandes-AlnemriTKangSFariasAQinFAlnemriES. Non-transcriptional priming and deubiquitination regulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J Biol Chem (2012) 287:36617–22.10.1074/jbc.M112.40713022948162CravenRRGaoXAllenICGrisDBubeck WardenburgJMcelvania-TekippeEStaphylococcus aureus alpha-hemolysin activates the NLRP3-inflammasome in human and mouse monocytic cells. PLoS One (2009) 4:e7446.10.1371/journal.pone.000744619826485McNeelaEABurkeANeillDRBaxterCFernandesVEFerreiraDPneumolysin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and promotes proinflammatory cytokines independently of TLR4. PLoS Pathog (2010) 6:e1001191.10.1371/journal.ppat.100119121085613KannegantiTDBody-MalapelMAmerAParkJHWhitfieldJFranchiLCritical role for Cryopyrin/Nalp3 in activation of caspase-1 in response to viral infection and double-stranded RNA. J Biol Chem (2006) 281:36560–8.10.1074/jbc.M60759420017008311AllenICScullMAMooreCBHollEKMcelvania-TekippeETaxmanDJThe NLRP3 inflammasome mediates in vivo innate immunity to influenza A virus through recognition of viral RNA. Immunity (2009) 30:556–65.10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.00519362020ThomasPGDashPAldridgeJRJr.EllebedyAHReynoldsCFunkAJThe intracellular sensor NLRP3 mediates key innate and healing responses to influenza A virus via the regulation of caspase-1. Immunity (2009) 30:566–75.10.1016/j.immuni.2009.02.00619362023RajanJVWarrenSEMiaoEAAderemA. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by intracellular poly I:C. FEBS Lett (2010) 584:4627–32.10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.03620971108KannegantiTDLamkanfiMKimYGChenGParkJHFranchiLPannexin-1-mediated recognition of bacterial molecules activates the cryopyrin inflammasome independent of Toll-like receptor signaling. Immunity (2007) 26:433–43.10.1016/j.immuni.2007.03.00817433728PicciniACartaSTassiSLasiglieDFossatiGRubartelliA. ATP is released by monocytes stimulated with pathogen-sensing receptor ligands and induces IL-1beta and IL-18 secretion in an autocrine way. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105:8067–72.10.1073/pnas.070968410518523012GombaultABaronLCouillinI. ATP release and purinergic signaling in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front Immunol (2012) 3:414.10.3389/fimmu.2012.0041423316199AynaGKryskoDVKaczmarekAPetrovskiGVandenabeelePFesusL. ATP release from dying autophagic cells and their phagocytosis are crucial for inflammasome activation in macrophages. PLoS One (2012) 7:e40069.10.1371/journal.pone.004006922768222CasselSLEisenbarthSCIyerSSSadlerJJColegioORTephlyLAThe Nalp3 inflammasome is essential for the development of silicosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105:9035–40.10.1073/pnas.080393310518577586DostertCPetrilliVVan BruggenRSteeleCMossmanBTTschoppJ. Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science (2008) 320:674–7.10.1126/science.115699518403674EisenbarthSCColegioORO’ConnorWSutterwalaFSFlavellRA. Crucial role for the Nalp3 inflammasome in the immunostimulatory properties of aluminium adjuvants. Nature (2008) 453:1122–6.10.1038/nature06939HalleAHornungVPetzoldGCStewartCRMonksBGReinheckelTThe NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-beta. Nat Immunol (2008) 9:857–65.10.1038/ni.163618604209HornungVBauernfeindFHalleASamstadEOKonoHRockKLSilica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol (2008) 9:847–56.10.1038/ni.1631KingsburySRConaghanPGMcdermottMF. The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in gout. J Inflamm Res (2011) 4:39–49.10.2147/JIR.S11330DostertCGuardaGRomeroJFMenuPGrossOTardivelAMalarial hemozoin is a Nalp3 inflammasome activating danger signal. PLoS One (2009) 4:e6510.10.1371/journal.pone.000651019652710NakahiraKHaspelJARathinamVALeeSJDolinayTLamHCAutophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome. Nat Immunol (2011) 12:222–30.10.1038/ni.198021151103ZhouRYazdiASMenuPTschoppJ. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature (2011) 469:221–5.10.1038/nature0966321124315ShimadaKCrotherTRKarlinJDagvadorjJChibaNChenSOxidized mitochondrial DNA activates the NLRP3 inflammasome during apoptosis. Immunity (2012) 36:401–14.10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.00922342844ZhongZZhaiYLiangSMoriYHanRSutterwalaFSTRPM2 links oxidative stress to NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nat Commun (2013) 4:1611.10.1038/ncomms260823511475IyerSSHeQJanczyJRElliottEIZhongZOlivierAKMitochondrial cardiolipin is required for Nlrp3 inflammasome activation. Immunity (2013) 39:311–23.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.00123954133LeeGSSubramanianNKimAIAksentijevichIGoldbach-ManskyRSacksDBThe calcium-sensing receptor regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome through Ca2+ and cAMP. Nature (2012) 492:123–7.10.1038/nature1158823143333MurakamiTOckingerJYuJBylesVMccollAHoferAMCritical role for calcium mobilization in activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2012) 109:11282–7.10.1073/pnas.111776510922733741RossolMPiererMRaulienNQuandtDMeuschURotheKExtracellular Ca2+ is a danger signal activating the NLRP3 inflammasome through G protein-coupled calcium sensing receptors. Nat Commun (2012) 3:1329.10.1038/ncomms233923271661ShenoyARWellingtonDAKumarPKassaHBoothCJCresswellPGBP5 promotes NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and immunity in mammals. Science (2012) 336:481–5.10.1126/science.121714122461501Munoz-PlanilloRKuffaPMartinez-ColonGSmithBLRajendiranTMNunezG. K(+) efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity (2013) 38:1142–53.10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.01623809161SaitohTFujitaNJangMHUematsuSYangBGSatohTLoss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1beta production. Nature (2008) 456:264–8.10.1038/nature0738318849965HarrisJHartmanMRocheCZengSGO’SheaASharpFAAutophagy controls IL-1beta secretion by targeting pro-IL-1beta for degradation. J Biol Chem (2011) 286:9587–97.10.1074/jbc.M110.20291121228274ShiCSShenderovKHuangNNKabatJAbu-AsabMFitzgeraldKAActivation of autophagy by inflammatory signals limits IL-1beta production by targeting ubiquitinated inflammasomes for destruction. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:255–63.10.1038/ni.221522286270LupferCThomasPGAnandPKVogelPMilastaSMartinezJReceptor interacting protein kinase 2-mediated mitophagy regulates inflammasome activation during virus infection. Nat Immunol (2013) 14:480–8.10.1038/ni.256323525089BrueyJMBruey-SedanoNLucianoFZhaiDBalpaiRXuCBcl-2 and Bcl-XL regulate proinflammatory caspase-1 activation by interaction with NALP1. Cell (2007) 129:45–56.10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.04517418785FaustinBChenYZhaiDLe NegrateGLartigueLSatterthwaitAMechanism of Bcl-2 and Bcl-X(L) inhibition of NLRP1 inflammasome: loop domain-dependent suppression of ATP binding and oligomerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2009) 106:3935–40.10.1073/pnas.080941410619223583HawkinsCJUrenAGHackerGMedcalfRLVauxDL. Inhibition of interleukin 1 beta-converting enzyme-mediated apoptosis of mammalian cells by baculovirus IAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1996) 93:13786–90.10.1073/pnas.93.24.137868943013LabbeKMcintireCRDoironKLeblancPMSalehM. Cellular inhibitors of apoptosis proteins cIAP1 and cIAP2 are required for efficient caspase-1 activation by the inflammasome. Immunity (2011) 35:897–907.10.1016/j.immuni.2011.10.01622195745VinceJEWongWWGentleILawlorKEAllamRO’ReillyLInhibitor of apoptosis proteins limit RIP3 kinase-dependent interleukin-1 activation. Immunity (2012) 36:215–27.10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.01222365665KayagakiNWarmingSLamkanfiMVande WalleLLouieSDongJNon-canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase-11. Nature (2011) 479:117–21.10.1038/nature1055822002608GurungPMalireddiRKAnandPKDemonDVande WalleLLiuZToll or interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon-beta (TRIF)-mediated caspase-11 protease production integrates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) protein- and Nlrp3 inflammasome-mediated host defense against enteropathogens. J Biol Chem (2012) 287:34474–83.10.1074/jbc.M112.40140622898816RathinamVAVanajaSKWaggonerLSokolovskaABeckerCStuartLMTRIF licenses caspase-11-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation by gram-negative bacteria. Cell (2012) 150:606–19.10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.00722819539SagulenkoVThygesenSJSesterDPIdrisACridlandJAVajjhalaPRAIM2 and NLRP3 inflammasomes activate both apoptotic and pyroptotic death pathways via ASC. Cell Death Differ (2013) 20:1149–60.10.1038/cdd.2013.3723645208GurungPAnandPKMalireddiRKVande WalleLVan OpdenboschNDillonCPFADD and caspase-8 mediate priming and activation of the canonical and noncanonical Nlrp3 inflammasomes. J Immunol (2014) 192:1835–46.10.4049/jimmunol.130283924453255KangTBYangSHTothBKovalenkoAWallachD. Caspase-8 blocks kinase RIPK3-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Immunity (2013) 38:27–40.10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.01523260196AllenICTekippeEMWoodfordRMUronisJMHollEKRogersABThe NLRP3 inflammasome functions as a negative regulator of tumorigenesis during colitis-associated cancer. J Exp Med (2010) 207:1045–56.10.1084/jem.2010005020385749ZakiMHBoydKLVogelPKastanMBLamkanfiMKannegantiTD. The NLRP3 inflammasome protects against loss of epithelial integrity and mortality during experimental colitis. Immunity (2010) 32:379–91.10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.00320303296Dupaul-ChicoineJYeretssianGDoironKBergstromKSMcintireCRLeblancPMControl of intestinal homeostasis, colitis, and colitis-associated colorectal cancer by the inflammatory caspases. Immunity (2010) 32:367–78.10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.01220226691ZakiMHVogelPBody-MalapelMLamkanfiMKannegantiTD. IL-18 production downstream of the Nlrp3 inflammasome confers protection against colorectal tumor formation. J Immunol (2010) 185:4912–20.10.4049/jimmunol.100204620855874SalcedoRWorschechACardoneMJonesYGyulaiZDaiRMMyD88-mediated signaling prevents development of adenocarcinomas of the colon: role of interleukin 18. J Exp Med (2010) 207:1625–36.10.1084/jem.2010019920624890ReuterBKPizarroTT. Commentary: the role of the IL-18 system and other members of the IL-1R/TLR superfamily in innate mucosal immunity and the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: friend or foe?Eur J Immunol (2004) 34:2347–55.10.1002/eji.20042535115307167SiegmundB. Interleukin-18 in intestinal inflammation: friend and foe?Immunity (2010) 32:300–2.10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.01020346770PastorelliLDe SalvoCMercadoJRVecchiMPizarroTT. Central role of the gut epithelial barrier in the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation: lessons learned from animal models and human genetics. Front Immunol (2013) 4:280.10.3389/fimmu.2013.0028024062746WeiQMuKLiTZhangYYangZJiaXDeregulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in hepatic parenchymal cells during liver cancer progression. Lab Invest (2014) 94:52–62.10.1038/labinvest.2013.12624166187UngerbackJBelenkiDJawad Ul-HassanAFredriksonMFransenKElanderNGenetic variation and alterations of genes involved in NFkappaB/TNFAIP3- and NLRP3-inflammasome signaling affect susceptibility and outcome of colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis (2012) 33:2126–34.10.1093/carcin/bgs25622843550VermaDSarndahlEAnderssonHErikssonPFredriksonMJonssonJIThe Q705K polymorphism in NLRP3 is a gain-of-function alteration leading to excessive interleukin-1beta and IL-18 production. PLoS One (2012) 7:e34977.10.1371/journal.pone.003497722529966VermaDBivikCFarahaniESynnerstadIFredriksonMEnerbackCInflammasome polymorphisms confer susceptibility to sporadic malignant melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res (2012) 25:506–13.10.1111/j.1755-148X.2012.01008.x22524199OkamotoMLiuWLuoYTanakaACaiXNorrisDAConstitutively active inflammasome in human melanoma cells mediating autoinflammation via caspase-1 processing and secretion of interleukin-1beta. J Biol Chem (2010) 285:6477–88.10.1074/jbc.M109.06490720038581NikulenkovFSpinnlerCLiHTonelliCShiYTurunenMInsights into p53 transcriptional function via genome-wide chromatin occupancy and gene expression analysis. Cell Death Differ (2012) 19:1992–2002.10.1038/cdd.2012.8922790872SadasivamSGuptaSRadhaVBattaKKunduTKSwarupG. Caspase-1 activator Ipaf is a p53-inducible gene involved in apoptosis. Oncogene (2005) 24:627–36.10.1038/sj.onc.120820115580302HuBElinavEFlavellRA. Inflammasome-mediated suppression of inflammation-induced colorectal cancer progression is mediated by direct regulation of epithelial cell proliferation. Cell Cycle (2011) 10:1936–9.10.4161/cc.10.12.1600821555913HuBElinavEHuberSBoothCJStrowigTJinCInflammation-induced tumorigenesis in the colon is regulated by caspase-1 and NLRC4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2010) 107:21635–40.10.1073/pnas.101681410821118981FranchiLKamadaNNakamuraYBurberryAKuffaPSuzukiSNLRC4-driven production of IL-1beta discriminates between pathogenic and commensal bacteria and promotes host intestinal defense. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:449–56.10.1038/ni.226322484733GrenierJMWangLManjiGAHuangWJAl-GarawiAKellyRFunctional screening of five PYPAF family members identifies PYPAF5 as a novel regulator of NF-kappaB and caspase-1. FEBS Lett (2002) 530:73–8.10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03416-612387869ChenGYLiuMWangFBertinJNunezG. A functional role for Nlrp6 in intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis. J Immunol (2011) 186:7187–94.10.4049/jimmunol.110041221543645ElinavEStrowigTKauALHenao-MejiaJThaissCABoothCJNLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis. Cell (2011) 145:745–57.10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.02221565393NormandSDelanoye-CrespinABressenotAHuotLGrandjeanTPeyrin-BirouletLNod-like receptor pyrin domain-containing protein 6 (NLRP6) controls epithelial self-renewal and colorectal carcinogenesis upon injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2011) 108:9601–6.10.1073/pnas.110098110821593405HuberSGaglianiNZenewiczLAHuberFJBosurgiLHuBIL-22BP is regulated by the inflammasome and modulates tumorigenesis in the intestine. Nature (2012) 491:259–63.10.1038/nature1153523075849WangLManjiGAGrenierJMAl-GarawiAMerriamSLoraJMPYPAF7, a novel PYRIN-containing Apaf1-like protein that regulates activation of NF-kappa B and caspase-1-dependent cytokine processing. J Biol Chem (2002) 277:29874–80.10.1074/jbc.M20391520012019269VladimerGIWengDPaquetteSWVanajaSKRathinamVAAuneMHThe NLRP12 inflammasome recognizes Yersinia pestis. Immunity (2012) 37:96–107.10.1016/j.immuni.2012.07.00622840842MacalusoFNothnagelMParwezQPetrasch-ParwezEBecharaFGEpplenJTPolymorphisms in NACHT-LRR (NLR) genes in atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol (2007) 16:692–8.10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00589.x17620097JeruIDuquesnoyPFernandes-AlnemriTCochetEYuJWLackmy-Port-LisMMutations in NALP12 cause hereditary periodic fever syndromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2008) 105:1614–9.10.1073/pnas.070861610518230725ArthurJCLichJDYeZAllenICGrisDWilsonJECutting edge: NLRP12 controls dendritic and myeloid cell migration to affect contact hypersensitivity. J Immunol (2010) 185:4515–9.10.4049/jimmunol.100222720861349BorghiniSTassiSChiesaSCaroliFCartaSCaorsiRClinical presentation and pathogenesis of cold-induced autoinflammatory disease in a family with recurrence of an NLRP12 mutation. Arthritis Rheum (2011) 63:830–9.10.1002/art.3017021360512WilliamsKLLichJDDuncanJAReedWRallabhandiPMooreCThe CATERPILLER protein monarch-1 is an antagonist of toll-like receptor-, tumor necrosis factor alpha-, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced pro-inflammatory signals. J Biol Chem (2005) 280:39914–24.10.1074/jbc.M50282020016203735ArthurJCLichJDAzizRKKotbMTingJP. Heat shock protein 90 associates with monarch-1 and regulates its ability to promote degradation of NF-kappaB-inducing kinase. J Immunol (2007) 179:6291–6.10.4049/jimmunol.179.9.629117947705LichJDWilliamsKLMooreCBArthurJCDavisBKTaxmanDJMonarch-1 suppresses non-canonical NF-kappaB activation and p52-dependent chemokine expression in monocytes. J Immunol (2007) 178:1256–60.10.4049/jimmunol.178.3.125617237370ZakiMHVogelPMalireddiRKBody-MalapelMAnandPKBertinJThe NOD-like receptor NLRP12 attenuates colon inflammation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell (2011) 20:649–60.10.1016/j.ccr.2011.10.02222094258AllenICWilsonJESchneiderMLichJDRobertsRAArthurJCNLRP12 suppresses colon inflammation and tumorigenesis through the negative regulation of noncanonical NF-kappaB signaling. Immunity (2012) 36:742–54.10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.01222503542GaraudeJKentAVan RooijenNBlanderJM. Simultaneous targeting of toll- and nod-like receptors induces effective tumor-specific immune responses. Sci Transl Med (2012) 4:120ra116.10.1126/scitranslmed.300286822323829YanagawaHHakuTTakeuchiESuzukiYNokiharaHSoneS. Intrapleural therapy with MDP-Lys (L18), a synthetic derivative of muramyl dipeptide, against malignant pleurisy associated with lung cancer. Lung Cancer (2000) 27:67–73.10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00090-210688489NittaYSugitaTIkutaYMurakamiT. Inhibitory effect of liposomal MDP-Lys on lung metastasis of transplantable osteosarcoma in hamster. Oncol Res (2000) 12:25–31.11061343YooYCSaikiISatoKAzumaI. MDP-Lys(L18), a lipophilic derivative of muramyl dipeptide, inhibits the metastasis of haematogenous and non-haematogenous tumours in mice. Vaccine (1994) 12:175–260.10.1016/0264-410X(94)90057-48147100FujimuraTYamasakiKHidakaTItoYAibaS. A synthetic NOD2 agonist, muramyl dipeptide (MDP)-Lys (L18) and IFN-beta synergistically induce dendritic cell maturation with augmented IL-12 production and suppress melanoma growth. J Dermatol Sci (2011) 62:107–15.10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.02.00221411292ChowMTSceneayJPagetCWongCSDuretHTschoppJNLRP3 suppresses NK cell-mediated responses to carcinogen-induced tumors and metastases. Cancer Res (2012) 72:5721–32.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-050922986739BruchardMMignotGDerangereVChalminFChevriauxAVegranFChemotherapy-triggered cathepsin B release in myeloid-derived suppressor cells activates the Nlrp3 inflammasome and promotes tumor growth. Nat Med (2013) 19:57–64.10.1038/nm.299923202296ZitvogelLKeppOGalluzziLKroemerG. Inflammasomes in carcinogenesis and anticancer immune responses. Nat Immunol (2012) 13:343–51.10.1038/ni.222422430787LustJALacyMQZeldenrustSRDispenzieriAGertzMAWitzigTEInduction of a chronic disease state in patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma by targeting interleukin 1{beta}-induced interleukin 6 production and the myeloma proliferative component. Mayo Clin Proc (2009) 84:114–22.10.4065/84.2.11419181644TermeMUllrichEAymericLMeinhardtKDesboisMDelahayeNIL-18 induces PD-1-dependent immunosuppression in cancer. Cancer Res (2011) 71:5393–9.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-099321724589TermeMUllrichEAymericLMeinhardtKCoudertJDDesboisMCancer-induced immunosuppression: IL-18-elicited immunoablative NK cells. Cancer Res (2012) 72:2757–67.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-337922427351