Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of a Novel Host-Modulatory Therapy for Reducing Gingival Inflammation

Background Periodontal disease is among the sixth most common inflammatory diseases worldwide with high risk to promote complications from other inflammatory diseases including diabetes, cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s Disease. Failure of active resolution of inflammation pathways is implicated in pathogenesis of periodontal diseases, including gingivitis. Lipoxin A4 (LXA4), a member of the specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) that drive resolution of inflammation via GPC-receptor mediated pathways, offered therapeutic advantages in preclinical models of periodontitis. Methods We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase 1 clinical trial to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of an LXA4 analog in patients with gingival inflammation. One hundred twenty-seven (127) individuals were randomized to daily use of an oral rinse containing a LXA4 mimetic, methyl ester-benzo-lipoxin A4 (BLXA4), placebo rinse or a no-rinse control group for 28 days. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed for safety, the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the change in the level of gingival inflammation and periodontal pocket depth (PD). Serum SPMs were monitored using targeted lipid mediator lipidomics to assess potential systemic impact of BLXA4. Results The frequency of TEAEs was similar in BLXA4 and placebo-treated groups with no study-related SAEs. Once-daily rinsing with BLXA4 for 28-days resulted in a greater decrease in gingival inflammation compared to placebo rinse and no-rinse control groups (mean change: 0.26 GI unit vs 0.21 and 0.17, respectively). PD reduction was also greater with BLXA4 oral rinse compared to placebo and no-rinse groups (mean reduction: 1.23 mm vs. 0.71 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively). Topical application of BLXA4 increased serum levels of SPMs. Conclusion Treatment with BLXA4 reduces local inflammation, and increases abundance of pro-resolution molecules systemically, which may dampen inflammation that can mediate progression and course of inflammatory diseases beyond periodontitis. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT02342691).


INTRODUCTION
Inflammation is the normal host tissue response to infection and injury. However, uncontrolled and unresolved inflammation contributes to a range of chronic human conditions such as arthritis, cardiovascular diseases and periodontitis (1)(2)(3). Periodontitis, with an overall prevalence of 45%-50% in the population, is the sixth most common human disease (4,5). Periodontitis is a progressive disease in which microbial etiologic factors induce an inflammatory cascade that leads to destruction of the organ supporting the teeth, the periodontium (6)(7)(8)(9). As with all inflammatory diseases, the arachidonate-derived eicosanoids play a key role in the initiation and pathogenesis of periodontitis (10)(11)(12). The associated gram negative bacteria of the dysbiotic biofilm on and around the teeth, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella Forsythia, initiate an influx of neutrophils and neutrophil cyclooxygenase-2 activation leading to increased lipid mediators such as prostaglandin E 2 in situ (13). Prostaglandin E 2 is a potent activator of osteoclastmediated bone resorption, the hallmark of periodontal disease (12,14,15). Other lipid mediators such as leukotriene B 4, produced mainly by activated leukocytes, initiate accumulation and superoxide generation by neutrophils within inflamed sites stimulating the release of granule-associated enzymes and bone resorption (16)(17)(18). Together with other eicosanoids, PGE 2 mediates inflammation and periodontal tissue destruction (19,20).
It is now widely recognized that endogenous pro-resolving lipid mediators actively participate in regulating host responses and orchestrate resolution of inflammation (21,22). Lipoxins, the product of lipoxygenase-lipoxygenase interactions, are trihydroxy products of arachidonic acid that actively drive resolution of inflammation; they are typified by lipoxin A 4 (LXA 4 ). In addition, the previously unappreciated role of aspirin-triggered transformation circuits in producing the endogenous anti-inflammatory 15R-epimers of LXA 4 has led to a better understanding of pro-resolution signaling networks, including a series of complex cellular and chemical reactions and tissue trafficking events (23). For example, lipoxins not only reduce the influx of neutrophils, but also stimulate the nonphlogistic uptake of apoptotic neutrophils by tissue-resident macrophages, a prerequisite for resolution of inflammation (24,25).
Current therapies for gingivitis and periodontitis remain inadequate. We demonstrated in animal models of periodontitis that SPMs, including lipoxins and resolvins (i.e., LXA 4 , RvE1), are capable of preventing and treating periodontal disease by resolving local inflammation allowing soft and bone tissues to regenerate, as well as damping systemic inflammation induced by the local disease and rebiosis of the oral microbiome (26)(27)(28)(29).
This Phase 1 randomized clinical trial was designed to determine in humans the impact of a stable analog mimetic of lipoxin A 4 denoted BLXA 4 in inflammatory periodontal disease. In comparison with native LXA 4 , the methyl-ester of BLXA 4 was found to be stable in an in-vitro stability assay system containing eicosanoid oxido-reductase, and this particular analog was most effective at inhibiting polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration in a murine peritonitis model (approximately 32% reduction). In the same model system, the benchmark compound, aspirintrigger lipoxin A 4 (ATLa), resulted in 40% reduction of polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration (30).
SPMs in their pure form are low molecular weight hydrophobic molecules that easily penetrate mucosa making them ideal for topical application. These physical properties also suggest that topical SPMs will be readily absorbed into the circulation and have systemic impact. Thus, an important question also addressed herein is the inflammatory mediator profile in serum after oral topical administration of BLXA 4 ; not just BLXA 4 levels in serum but the inflammatory lipid mediator lipidome in total.
Based on these in vitro and preclinical in vivo observations, we aimed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of the use of proresolving agent, BLXA 4 , in a mouthwash formulation in patients with gingival inflammation.

Ethical Considerations and Institutional Review Board Approvals
The protocol, screening and study consent forms, recruitment materials, and all subject materials were reviewed and approved by the Forsyth Institute IRB before any subject was enrolled (IRB approval no. 15-04). All amendments to the protocol were reviewed and approved by the IRB before the changes were implemented in the study. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03196618).

Subject Information and Consent
Informed consent process was initiated prior to the individual agreeing to participate in study screening at the Screening Visit or to participate in the study at the Enrollment/Baseline Visit 1, and continued throughout study participation. An extensive discussion of risks and possible benefits of study participation was provided to interested individuals and informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to any study-related assessments or procedures.

Study Design and Randomization
This phase 1/2 study comprised 3 groups in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel group design. Qualified participants were enrolled in the study and received baseline evaluations within 7-10 days of screening. Participants were randomized into treatment groups using a permuted block randomization schedule. The randomization sequence was generated by the study biostatistician with a random number generator. The randomization scheme was kept in the sole possession of the unblinded clinician who was also responsible for providing study treatments with instructions to participants and assessing the protocol and product compliance throughout the study.

Participant Selection, Enrollment, and Compliance Assessment
Participants were recruited from the volunteer pool at the Forsyth Institute Center for Clinical and Translational Research (CCTR). Subjects were healthy adults, aged 18 through 65 years, with gingivitis/periodontitis presenting existing gingival inflammation as defined by MGI ≥ 2.0. The treatment group (the methyl-ester of BLXA4 at 1mM concentration in an oral rinse) and the placebo rinse group (same oral rinse formulation without BLXA4) consisted of 50 subjects each while the no-rinse control group consisted of 27 subjects in a 2:2:1 randomization scheme. These group sizes were planned to allow for a 20% dropout rate. Subjects in all groups were instructed to maintain their regular brushing habits and use the assigned mouth rinse once daily after morning toothbrushing for 28 days.
Those with current medical conditions or on medications known to affect periodontal tissues or interfere with any of the study outcomes were excluded. In addition, individuals with orthodontic appliances, pregnant and nursing women, and current or former smokers within 1 year of enrollment were excluded due to potential confounding effects on study outcomes.
After baseline, participants were evaluated on Day 3 (only for safety and compliance) and at days 7, 14, 21 and 28 for safety, compliance and efficacy measurements. A follow up phone call at Day 90 was also performed for safety evaluation. Compliance of study rinse use was assessed at all follow-up study visits by measurement of the remaining volume and review of participant logs. Expected volume returned was calculated as the volume dispensed -(number of days since last study visit x 30 ml). A participant was considered to have "overused" the rinse if used more than (>120%) prescribed use. A participant was considered to have "underused" the rinse if less than (<80%) prescribed use. In addition, participants were exclusively interviewed by a separate clinician for oral hygiene practices, concomitant medication use, and adverse events; deviations were recorded, and participants were reinstructed, if needed.

Outcome Measures
Safety endpoint (primary) was evaluated by adverse event (AE) assessment, change in vital signs, clinical laboratory tests (blood chemistry, complete blood count and urinalysis), and oral examinations for mucosal irritancy and inflammation. In addition, supragingival plaque was analyzed for microbial species to evaluate shifts in the dental biofilm using DNA-DNA hybridization checkerboard technique (31) (Supplementary Material-Materials and Methods for details). Secondary efficacy endpoints included MGI and BOP as the indices of gingival inflammation; PD and CAL were measured as exploratory efficacy endpoints (32) Absorption of BLXA 4 through the oral mucosa and profiling of specialized lipid mediators in serum before and after treatment on Day 28 were analyzed using LC-MS/MS lipidomics at the Forsyth Institute Center for Salivary Diagnostics Mass Spectrometry Core using the method of Colas et al. (31).

Examiner Calibration
Two trained and calibrated examiners (HS and MM) blinded to study treatments were responsible for all clinical oral measurements and safety assessments in a given subject for the course of the study. An intra-and inter-examiner calibration exercise was performed as in (33) with a minimum k coefficient of 0.8 for intra-examiner and of 0.7 for inter-examiner alignment.

Study Products
The study product, BLXA 4 containing oral rinse, received an Investigational New Drug designation (IND #: 107061; Sponsor: Van Dyke) from the FDA prior to study initiation. The topical oral rinse dosage form of BLXA 4 consisted of drug substance prepared at a concentration of 1.0 mM in an aqueous vehicle solution containing the inactive components shown in Supplementary Table 1. BLXA 4 is a member of a new class of chemically and metabolically stable lipoxin analogs featuring a replacement of the tetraene unit of native LXA 4 with a substituted benzo-fused ring system (30). The full chemical name of the BLXA 4 drug substance is (5S, 6R, E)-methyl 5,6-dihydroxy-8-(2-((R,E)-3-hydroxyoct-1-enyl) phenyl) oct-7-enoate (9, 12-benzo LXA 4 ). The placebo preparation consisted of formulated oral rinse without BLXA 4 and was identical to the test rinse in color, appearance, and taste. Both the BLXA 4 oral rinse and placebo oral rinse were prepared and packaged in amber high-density polyethylene bottles by a Good Manufacturing Practice facility (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., Alabaster, AL) as a contract synthesis.
Rinses were stored at 2-8°C until dispensing to participants and were used at room temperature within 7-10 days. Additional information on products used in this study is provided in Supplementary Material.

Preclinical Safety and Toxicology Studies
As part of the NIH grant supporting the randomized clinical trial proposal and as required for the FDA IND submission, nonclinical pharmacodynamics studies were performed with BLXA 4 to address the primary mechanism of action and safety prior to human clinical testing at a commercial Good Laboratory Practices compliant laboratory (Calvert Laboratories, Inc., Scott Township, PA). Nonclinical safety pharmacology studies performed included an in vitro study evaluating the effect of BLXA 4 on the hERG potassium channel, and in vivo studies of the effect of BLXA 4 on central nervous system, pulmonary, and cardiovascular function in rats and dogs. The pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicokinetic exposure to BLXA 4 were also examined in both rats and dogs. Furthermore, a 28-day oral irritancy study was performed in male and female rats to assess the potential of BLXA 4 oral rinse to cause mucosal irritancy and to assess its effects on the healing of abraded oral mucosa. The details of the preclinical testing and results of these studies are provided in Supplementary Material and Supplementary Tables 2-4.
Quantification was carried out based on peak area of the MRM transition and the linear calibration curve for each compound using the Multiquant 3.0.1 software (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA).

Analysis Population
The safety population consisted of all subjects who were randomized into a study arm and completed baseline visit. The efficacy population consisted of all subjects from the safety population who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment of 1 or more of the secondary efficacy outcome measures.

Sample Size Determination and Power
For the BLXA 4 oral rinse and the placebo oral rinse arms, a sample size of 40 subjects per treatment group with probabilities of 80.5%, 87.1%, 91.6%, and 96.4% of observing an AE having underlying incidence probabilities of 4%, 5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively. The no-rinse control arm was considered to be of lesser importance and, thus, to conserve the overall sample size, was assigned a sample size of 20 subjects, which had probabilities of 55.8%, 64.2%, 71.0%, and 81.1% of observing an AE having underlying incidence probabilities of 4%, 5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively. Thus, the above sample sizes of 40, 40, and 20 subjects were expected to provide adequate power (> 80%) to detect AEs that occur at true underlying frequencies of 4% or greater in the test and placebo oral rinse study arms and adequate power (> 80%) to detect AEs that occur at true underlying frequencies of 8% or greater in the no-rinse control arm. To account for a 20% maximum attrition rate, total of 125 subjects were planned to be enrolled (50:50:25). Secondary efficacy analyses were considered as trend analysis with 70% power for detecting true differences between BLXA 4 and placebo and 53% between no-rinse. The secondary endpoint analyses aimed to obtain estimates of the size and variance of possible treatment effects that can then be used to plan further clinical trials.

Statistical Analyses
Summary statistics of the secondary endpoints and their change from baseline, including n, means, minimums, maximums, standard deviations, and standard errors were summarized by study arm and study visit: MGI and BOP at Day 14 and Day 28. Exploratory analyses tested for treatment arm differences in the change from baseline of the exploratory efficacy outcomes: PD and CAL at study Day 28. Since the trend analysis was secondary, two different methods of analysis were used. Secondary endpoints were first analyzed using mixed models with changes from baseline as the dependent variable, subject as a random effect, a covariate adjustment for baseline, and fixed effects for visit, study arm, and a study arm-by-visit interaction. Then, as a post-hoc test, logistic regression analysis of generalized estimating equations (GEE) for ordinal measures were performed by using the log odds ratio to model the association between treatment arm pairs. Further, analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measured used as post-hoc to test the site-specific changes in BOP over time between groups. Exploratory endpoints, PD and CAL, were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the PD or CAL change from baseline as the dependent variable, a covariate adjustment for baseline, and fixed effects study arm. The ANCOVA analyses assumed the outcomes were approximately normal in distribution with homogeneity of variance. Another exploratory endpoint, change in serum levels of lipid mediators were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) carried out using SIMCA software, version 13.0.3 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) (37). Changes in lipid mediator levels at Day 28 were also compared with baseline levels using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test for multiple comparisons (IBM SPSS software version 19).

Study Participants
Between June 2015 and October 2017, total of 579 individuals were assessed for study eligibility, of those 127 were found eligible and randomized in one of the study groups constituting the safety population ( Figure 1). Of these subjects, 50 were randomized to the BLXA 4 rinse group, 50 to the placebo rinse group and 27 to the no-rinse control group. Participants (N=127) who received at least one dose of the study rinse or completed one post-baseline study visit were included in the primary endpoint analysis (safety). The efficacy population was composed of 123 participants who completed at least one postbaseline visit (starting at Day 14) for the assessment of efficacy outcome measures; participants who dropped out or withdrew prior to Day 14 were replaced in the efficacy population. In safety and efficacy populations, 122 (96.1%) and 121 (98.4%) study participants completed the study, respectively.
Baseline demographics are shown in Table 2. Most subjects in the safety population were male (62.2%), white (63.0%), and not Hispanic or Latino (78.0%). The median age was 45.0 years (range 18 to 65 years). Demographic characteristics were similar across the BLXA 4 , placebo, and no-rinse control groups with the exception of a greater proportion of men in the placebo group than in the BLXA 4 group or no-rinse control group (BLXA 4 56.0%; placebo 70.0%; no-rinse control 59.3%), a greater proportion of black/African American subjects in the BLXA 4 and no-rinse control groups than in the placebo group (BLXA 4 All subjects tolerated the study treatment and study procedures well with only mild and temporary AEs possibly related to study. Thirty-two subjects reported a total of 56 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 38% of subjects reporting at least 1 TEAE in the BLXA 4 group, 20% of subjects in the placebo group (20.0%) and 11.1% subjects in the no-rinse control group with no statistically significant differences between groups. No TEAEs led to study drug discontinuation ( Table 3). One SAE reported during the study by a participant in BLXA 4 group was judged to be not study related. There were reports of transient oral TEAEs that were considered possibly related to study drug, including dry mouth reported once by 3 participants and an aphthous lesion reported by a single participant on a single occasion in the BLXA 4 group. All oral TEAEs were rated as mild in severity and resolved without action. No clinically meaningful shifts in routine blood chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, oral ulceration or erythema of local tissues (Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale [OMAS]) were observed over time or among groups (Supplementary Material). FIGURE 1 | CONSORT diagram. CONSORT subject flow diagram shows the number of subjects screened, enrolled/randomized, and included in the primary safety and secondary efficacy analyses. Out of 579 patients screened, 127 individuals were found eligible, agreed to participate, and enrolled in the study. Fifty participants were randomized to BLXA 4 rinse, 50 to placebo rinse and 27 participants to no rinse control group. The primary endpoint safety analysis included all subjects treated with at least one dose of BLXA4 or placebo or those who completed at least one follow up visit after baseline. The secondary endpoint efficacy analysis included those subjects who completed at least one follow up visit (starting at Day 14) for efficacy measures (PD, CAL, BOP, PI). Two subjects dropped out before the necessary Day 14 visit completion, thus replaced per protocol. In BLXA 4 group, 3 subjects used unallocated rinse up to 3, 4 and 7 days respectively, thus excluded from efficacy analysis. 1 subject in placebo and 1 subject in no-rinse groups did not complete Day 28 visit (lost-to-follow up and withdrew consent, respectively) and excluded from efficacy analysis for that time point.   demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean MGI at Day 28 from baseline compared to the no-rinse control group (P=0.041) and a trend toward a difference compared to the placebo group (P=0.076) (Figure 2). Using generalized estimating equation (GEE) modelling for probability of having higher gingival index, we found that, compared to placebo rinse, BLXA 4 rinse was significantly protective against increasing gingival inflammation over time (OR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.58 -0.98; p=0.04).
Another key sign of gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding measured by percent of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP), decreased from baseline at both Day 14 and Day 28 in all three groups. Although the differences were not statistically significant based on regression analysis by least squares, reduction in BOP was steady and more pronounced in patients treated with BLXA 4 rinse compared to placebo and no-rinse groups. The data was also analyzed post-hoc using ANOVA for repeated measures followed by Tukey-Kramer to test compare the site-specific changes over time compared with baseline. Percent reduction in bleeding on probing was statistically significant with BLXA 4 treatment compared to changes seen with placebo at both Day 14 and Day 28 (P<0.0001 and P=0.0053) (Figure 3). There was a clear trend in differences between BLXA 4 and the no-rinse group, however, they were not statistically significant (P=0.299 and P=0.111).
Analysis of additional secondary outcomes showed a clinically meaningful trends in the reduction of pocket depth with time. A sub-analysis of sites with baseline periodontitis (pocket depth ≥6 mm) and change over time revealed that periodontal pocket depth reduction (-1.23 ± 0.4 mm) with a 1.22 ± 0.6 mm clinical attachment gain was most pronounced in the BLXA 4 group compared to placebo group (-0.71 ± 0.3 mm in PD with a CAL gain of 0.72 ± 0.3 mm) (Figure 4).

Topical Oral BLXA 4 Treatment of Gingival Inflammation Shifts the LM-SPM Profile From Proinflammatory to Pro-Resolution
For exploratory secondary biomarker endpoints, we analyzed the serum concentration of lipid mediator levels to determine the    several of the pro-resolving mediators known to orchestrate resolution of inflammation in animal models ( Figure 6A). Notably, both arachidonic acid (w-6) and w-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid-derived mediators were increased, these included endogenous lipoxins (LXA 4 , LXB 4 ) and resolvins (RvD1), protectins (PD1) and maresins (MaR1, MaR2), respectively, as shown in Figure 6B and Table 4. Local treatment with BLXA4 significantly increased the abundance of SPMs in serum and distinctly separated the BLXA4-treated group from placebo group in the composition of lipid mediators indicating a shift in systemic inflammatory response toward resolution correlating with clinical findings. We next assessed the LM profiles of serum from BLXAtreated study group and serum from placebo group by grouping the mediators based on their biologic functions, comparing the differences between pro-resolving mediators (LXs, resolvins, protectins, and maresins) and proinflammatory mediators LTB4, PGE2, and PGD2 ( Figure 7A and Table 4). Results of this analysis demonstrated an increase in overall pro-resolving lipid mediator concentrations in the serum of BLXA4-treated individuals, while there was a decrease in pro-inflammatory mediator concentrations compared to placebo group (P=0.08 and P=0.004, respectively) and no rinse group (p=0.027 and p=0.001), respectively) ( Figure 7B and Table 4). The changes in SPM and pro-inflammatory mediator profiles are also supported by an overall pro-resolution lipid mediator profile measured by an increase in the resolution index (P=0.003 compared to placebo and P=0.056 compared to no-rinse). Resolution index was calculated by dividing the sum of the resolution mediators by the sum of proinflammatory eicosanoids for each subject ( Figure 7C) (37).
No significant differences were observed in post-treatment supragingival plaque levels or IL-1b levels in the gingival crevicular fluid between BLXA 4 -treated, placebo-treated or norinse control groups (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
This is the first human oral treatment study to examine BLXA 4 oral rinse as a potential new therapy in patients with periodontal inflammation. We show that topical administration of a proresolving lipid mediator administered through a daily mouthwash is feasible, well-tolerated and effective to reduce oral inflammation. In addition, we document the first eicosanoid-SPM signatures in peripheral blood serum markedly upregulated as a result of a 28-day oral topical application of BLXA 4 . Safety was assessed using transient emerging adverse events over the course of the trial as the primary outcome. There were no adverse safety signals noted throughout the trial. The few adverse events reported were not severe and the only potentially related event to the mouth rinse was mild oral irritation, which was distributed evenly between groups. Oral irritation was likely due to sodium lauryl sulfate in the mouth rinse preparation.
Lipoxins are a class of endogenously biosynthesized mediators that promote the resolution of inflammation (38).    infiltration, promotion of macrophage polarization, increase of macrophage efferocytosis, and restoration of tissue homeostasis (39). The mechanism includes down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, inhibition of the activation of the master pro-inflammatory pathways and increased release of pro-resolving cytokines (e.g., interleukin-10) (39). Accumulating evidence from our laboratory (29,(40)(41)(42) and many others (24,(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48) has demonstrated that lipoxins and synthetic analogues protect tissues from damage from excess inflammation and reverse chronic inflammation promoting return to tissue homeostasis. We demonstrated earlier in animal models of periodontitis that oral topical application of lipoxin A 4 (29) and resolvin E1 (26)(27)(28)49) significantly protect against soft tissue and alveolar bone destruction caused by local periodontal inflammation, and induce regeneration of destroyed periodontal tissues, including gingiva, periodontal ligament and alveolar bone. In addition to local inflammation, topical application of LXA 4 and RvE1 significantly dampened the systemic inflammatory burden as demonstrated by reduced levels of serum C-reactive protein and interleukin 1b (26,29,49). Periodontal disease is a bacterial biofilm-induced chronic inflammatory disease resulting in loss of connective tissue attachment to the teeth and osteoclast-mediated alveolar bone resorption (50). Leukocytes play multiple roles in the progression of periodontal disease, including phagocytosis and killing of bacteria, secretion of inflammatory cytokines, mounting of specific immune response and activation of osteoclasts (51). Leukocytes are essential in the host defense against oral pathogens; however, in susceptible individuals unable to resolve the inflammatory lesion, chronic inflammation in the periodontium causes periodontal bone loss (52).

Biological actions of lipoxins include limiting neutrophil
This phase 1 clinical trial is the first human study to evaluate the therapeutic opportunity provided by lipoxin A 4 as a novel approach to treat chronic oral inflammatory disorders, focusing on periodontal disease. Periodontitis is an example of a host leukocyte-mediated disease. Current periodontal therapy focuses on control of the bacterial load, but these approaches have limited success and disease recurrence is a frequent problem. Moreover, periodontal tissue regeneration is not possible with antimicrobial approaches alone. The promise shown for host modulating approaches that regulate inflammatory immune responses without pharmacologic inhibition of proinflammatory pathways that are associated with significant side-effects prompted drug development in this area.
The phase1 clinical trial was powered for safety, and efficacy variables were evaluated secondarily. While underpowered,  . This is a particularly interesting clinical finding as with conventional and robust therapeutic approaches comprising standard of care (scaling and root planning in conjunction with systemic antibiotics), the clinically significant average pocket depth reduction is -0.86 mm with a clinical attachment gain of 0.75 mm (53). Reduction in gingival index, bleeding on probing and periodontal pocket depth suggest that BLXA 4 is a promising non-invasive therapeutic approach for the treatment of inflammatory periodontal diseases. Based on these earlier pre-clinical animal results, we establish here, for the first time in this phase 1 clinical trial that BLXA 4 at a 1.0µM (284 µg/ml) dose (the minimal effective dose previously shown to have an impact in a rabbit model of periodontitis) demonstrates significant clinical potential in increasing the endogenous levels of SPMs critical for a strong protective and pro-resolving innate immune response. In particular, specific SPMs including lipoxins (LXA 4 , LXB 4 ), resolvins (RvE1, RvD1-RvD6), protectins (PD1) and maresins (MaR1, MaR2) responsible for a range of cellular and biochemical events in resolution of inflammation, and their precursors (15-HETE, 18-HEPE, 17-HDHA), were differentially expressed in the serum of BLXA 4 -treated participants. These findings are consistent with earlier results from animal models suggesting the potential of pro-resolving agonists for treating oral/periodontal diseases associated with infection, inflammation, and altered phagocyte functions (3,(26)(27)(28)54). More importantly, the robust actions of topically applied BLXA 4 on systemic levels of SPMs suggest that oral tissues can serve as an easy-to-access application route for potential treatment of a wide range of inflammatory diseases (55)(56)(57)(58). BLXA 4 was not detected, likely due to its clearance to below detectable levels after administration. Pharmacokinetic studies planned for in the Phase 2 trial are necessary to determine the kinetics of BLXA 4 in circulation.
As a Phase 1 trial, this study has a few shortcomings. First, the study was primarily conducted for testing the safety of BLXA 4 in humans; thus, the study was underpowered for detecting the differences in clinical efficacy endpoints. Second, the study included a group of subjects (no-rinse group) that did not use any rinse aiming to detect the confounding impact of the mechanical actions of rinsing. This no rinse group could, therefore, not be double blinded. In addition, the study assumed the effective dose of the BLXA 4 based only on studies in an animal model of periodontal inflammation, thus the effect size of the BLXA 4 compared to placebo could be underestimated.
Lastly, the study was not precisely powered to rule out the potential Hawthorne effect (59, 60) (performing better once in a clinical trial regardless of the assigned study group) in clinical trials. It is, however, worth mentioning that despite a small sample size and limited power, the study was large enough to detect an impact on the key inflammatory parameters, GI and BOP, and systemic levels of pro-resolution lipid mediators at the minimal effective dose of BLXA 4 determined in animal trials. Further, finding a trend in a greater pocket depth reduction in a subgroup of subjects having periodontitis with deeper pockets in such a short time frame (28 days) highlights the potential role of BLXA 4 in the treatment of periodontal diseases. In addition, the duration of 28 days could be a limiting factor to determine longterm effects, primarily the impact on compliance. Nevertheless, further dose-response studies powered for testing clinically meaningful differences in clinical periodontal endpoints are needed.
Taken together, in this Phase 1/2 randomized controlled clinical trial, rinsing with a potent BLXA 4 containing mouthwash was well tolerated and presented no safety concerns. No safety signals beyond mild oral irritation were identified. Side effects, measured as transient emerging adverse events, were rare, mild and not associated with the drug. Topical application of BLXA 4 with a once-daily mouth rinse for 28 days effectively reduced gingival inflammation without additional mechanical treatment supporting the power of hostmodulatory therapies. Remarkably, the study revealed, for the first time, that topical application of BLXA 4 , beyond its local impact, shifted lipid mediators in serum toward a pro-resolution profile with significant changes in SPM levels compared to placebo. This finding demonstrates the potency of BLXA 4 at a topically applied micromolar dose that is effective in systemic regulation of resolution pathways as we found increases in specific serum SPMs in the individuals treated with BLXA 4 . BLXA 4 applied to human local oral tissues in a randomized trial was capable of shifting the inflammatory balance to resolution in periodontal inflammation with potential applications for other inflammatory diseases. Further, the stability of BLXA 4 in aqueous solutions (at least 3 months at room temperature) makes it suitable for further development as a therapeutic agent.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

ETHICS STATEMENT
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Forsyth Institute Institutional Review Board. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by Calvert Laboratories.