Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Lang. Sci.
Sec. Language Processing
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/flang.2024.1389301

Looking beyond Literacy and Phonology: Word Learning and Phonological Cue Use in Children With and Without Dyslexia Provisionally Accepted

  • 1Utrecht University, Netherlands
  • 2University of Oslo, Norway
  • 3Royal Auris Group, Netherlands
  • 4University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Receive an email when it is updated
You just subscribed to receive the final version of the article

This study investigated whether children with and without dyslexia differ in word learning and whether phonological cues to word class play a role. If children with dyslexia have difficulties with implicit learning, they might be less sensitive to such cues. A group of 92 Dutch primary school children from grades 3 to 6 participated in a word learning experiment, consisting of children with dyslexia (n = 46) and typically developing children (n = 46). Test items were four monosyllabic ‘verb-like’ nonwords (e.g., voek) and four bisyllabic ‘noun-like’ nonwords (e.g., banijn). They were presented as novel verbs or nouns in a two word sentence frame (e.g., “I voek” or “a voek”), paired with pictures of unfamiliar actions or objects. Nonwords were either consistent (e.g., “I voek”, “a banijn”) or inconsistent (e.g., “I banijn”, “a voek”) with word class. The word learning experiment consisted of a repetition, identification, and naming phase. Children with dyslexia showed lower word learning outcomes in the naming phase. However, phonological cues did not affect word learning in either group. Regression analyses indicated that phoneme awareness, receptive vocabulary, and nonword reading were predictors of word learning for all children. These findings indicate that Dutch children with dyslexia have more difficulty in recalling novel words, fitting in with their phonological difficulties. Phonological cues to word class did not contribute to word learning in either group.

Keywords: Dyslexia, oral word learning, phonological deficit, vocabulary, grammatical categorization

Received: 21 Feb 2024; Accepted: 24 May 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 van Viersen, Kerkhoff and de Bree. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Sietske van Viersen, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands