Two Decades of Match-Mismatch in Northeast Arctic Cod – Feeding Conditions and Survival

Introduction

Variability in the number of individuals in adult fish populations results mainly from the loss of individuals through natural and fishing mortality, and recruitment of individuals through the reproduction process (Payne et al., 2009). The survival until recruitment to the harvestable stock is a complex process that encompasses all conditions experienced by the fish including the variability in physical and biological conditions (Hjort, 1914). Numerous hypotheses have been developed to explain the observed variability in year-class success, mostly related to the early life stages of fish development. The “Critical Period” hypothesis explains year-class survival variability through the success or failure in finding enough suitable prey after the yolk-sac has been exhausted. Meanwhile, the “Aberrant Drift” hypothesis states that larvae survival is dependent on the dispersal to favorable areas, i.e., with enough prey and suitable abiotic conditions (Hjort, 1914; Houde, 2008). The “Match-mismatch” hypothesis explains the year-class survival variability through phenology and extends the critical period from the first-feeding stage until after metamorphosis (Cushing, 1969, 1990). This hypothesis highlights mechanisms that connect the temporal overlap between prey and predators as a key for the survival of the predators, assuming spatial overlap is present. Mismatch with prey results in slower growth and development and may lead to enhanced mortality because the larval fish are more susceptible to predation (Hjort, 1914; Durant et al., 2007; Ferreira et al., 2020). The three above mentioned hypotheses account for many underlying processes of various spatial and temporal resolutions that affect survival of the early life stages of fish, including starvation, transport to and from favorable habitats, and metabolic rates due to varying ambient conditions. Moreover, the relative importance of these processes to recruitment varies in space and time (Gallego et al., 2012; Hare, 2014).

Natural variability and ongoing climate change significantly influence the spatial and temporal distributions of predators and prey and may alter phenology and trophic interactions (Durant et al., 2007). It can also modify the costs and benefits associated with different spawning times and areas, and cause constraints at spawning grounds and shifts in the feeding areas, potentially through climate-driven changes in prey distribution (Fossheim et al., 2015). Changes in temperature affect the habitat selection of the spawners (Sundby and Nakken, 2008; Höffle et al., 2014; Sandø et al., 2020). Offspring transport may also be affected by changing ocean currents and cross-shelf exchange due to changes in ambient temperature, wind patterns and stratification that affects vertical egg distribution and spring bloom dynamics through nutrient availability (Vikebø et al., 2010, 2021; Skagseth et al., 2015; Strand et al., 2017).

Demographic structure and biological condition of the spawners may also influence the survival and distribution of the eggs and larvae of fish. The age and size composition of the spawning stock can influence spawning location, time, and duration (Sundby and Nakken, 2008; Opdal and Jørgensen, 2015; Langangen et al., 2019). For example, when there are older and bigger fish in the spawning stock of Northeast Arctic (NEA) cod, there is higher egg abundance and a spatially more widespread egg distribution (Stige et al., 2017). Furthermore, maternal characteristics affect egg quality, which in turn can impact larval susceptibility to starvation (Marteinsdottir and Steinarsson, 1998).

The diet of first-feeding larvae of NEA cod is mainly composed of copepod nauplii and for older larvae copepodites of Calanus finmarchicus (Dalpadado et al., 2009; Ottersen et al., 2014). Larvae are restricted to forage on prey smaller than their gape size, so it is important that the larvae are in a favorable place and time regarding prey concentrations of suitable sizes. The development of their main prey item C. finmarchicus is dependent on the onset of the seasonal spring bloom, which varies considerably (weeks) between years (Ellertsen et al., 1987; Vikebø et al., 2019; Dalpadado et al., 2020). Observations of prey availability are limited in space and time and can only provide a snapshot of the processes occurring in the ecosystem, but recently there are indications of a shift towards lower abundance, especially of C. finmarchicus, at the Norwegian continental shelf (Toresen et al., 2019).

Species-environment interactions are non-linear, and interannual dynamics cannot be reliably inferred from spatially averaged data (Ciannelli et al., 2007). On the other hand, individual based models (IBMs) coupled with ocean hydrodynamics models and nutrient, primary production, zooplankton, and detritus (NPZD) models represent complementary information about availability of suitable and sufficient prey items. The high spatial and temporal resolution of such models allow studying how local-scale processes translate into population-scale dynamics. In this study, we quantify availability of suitable prey items by combining the results from an IBM of NEA cod early life stages with an ocean hydrodynamics model and a NPZD model across the period 2000-2017. This approach enables quantification of intra- and interannual variations in match-mismatch and survival of NEA cod larvae through considerations of individual prey catches along individual drift trajectories for integration across the entire population (Kristiansen et al., 2009; Daewel et al., 2011; Strand et al., 2017). The analyses of the simulation results also enable investigation of the underlying spatio-temporal mechanisms regulating dispersal, feeding and development of individual NEA cod spawned along the Norwegian coast. We specifically address the following questions:

(I) Does prey availability (timing, size, and abundance) affect individual larval growth, spatially, seasonally and interannually?

(II) How does this effect on growth impact survival through early life stages until recruitment?

(III) What are the key mechanisms and their relative importance that control growth and survival until settlement at favorable nursery grounds?

Materials and Methods

Individual NEA cod larval growth was investigated using offline coupled models. Overall, the model results were calculated by using an ocean hydrodynamics model, a nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton-detritus model including an individual based model for Calanus finmarchicus, and an individual based model for NEA cod eggs and larvae. The simulations were run from 2000 to 2017, for the period between the 15th of January to the 30th of September each year. The results from the simulations were used to analyse growth and survival of the individuals from the egg stage until the larvae reaches the Barents Sea. We also account for size-dependent survival through the first winter after settlement in the Barents Sea.

Model Species

The Northeast Arctic Cod

The Northeast Arctic (NEA) stock of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) is one of the world’s largest and most studied cod stocks due to its commercial importance and of high commercial and ecological importance (Yaragina et al., 2011; Ottersen et al., 2014). NEA cod inhabits the Barents Sea, a shallow shelf sea and a transition zone for warm and saline waters between the Atlantic Ocean and the Arctic. Mature NEA cod individuals migrate long distances during winter-spring from their feeding habitats in the Barents Sea towards the south to spawn along the Norwegian coast (Figure 1), from Finnmark (71°N) to Møre (63°N), with the highest spawning activity in the Lofoten archipelago (69°N) (Opdal et al., 2008; Sundby and Nakken, 2008).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Northeast Arctic cod spawning sites and origins of particle dispersal: 1- Møre, 2 - Vikna, 3 - Røst, 4- Lofoten, 5 - Moskenesgrunnen, 6 - Senja, 7 - Malangsgrunnen, 8 -Torsvåg, 9 - Breivikbotn and 10 - East Finnmark. The black polygon represents the area where 95% of the larvae (2000-2017) are located when they are 15 days post hatch. Main surface ocean currents pattern in the Norwegian and Barents Sea is illustrated by the arrows: Norwegian Coastal Current (NCC – green arrows) and Norwegian Atlantic Current (NAC - red arrows).

The main spawning season lasts from early March until the end of April with a peak in early April (Ottersen et al., 2014). After spawning, the offspring drift northeastward in the upper layers of the water column and are transported by the Norwegian Coastal current (NCC) and the Norwegian Atlantic current (NAC) from the spawning grounds back to the Barents Sea (Vikebø et al., 2005). Egg development until hatching is highly dependent on ambient temperature, but it usually lasts from 2 to 5 weeks (Ellertsen et al., 1989; Yaragina et al., 2011). The NEA cod larvae yolk sac provides nutrition for about 5–7 days, whereafter the larvae switch to exogenous feeding about 3–6 weeks after spawning (on average late April) (Ottersen et al., 2014). By August - September successful offspring have reached the nursery grounds in the Barents Sea and are denoted 0-group. During the autumn (September - October) the 0-group descend towards the bottom and switch from the pelagic to the demersal phase in the Barents Sea. Surviving individuals are recruited to the harvested stock when they reach 3 years age.

Calanus finmarchicus

Calanus finmarchicus is one of the dominant species in the meso-zooplankton in the Atlantic water masses of the Norwegian Sea and Barents Sea. C. finmarchicus is an herbivore species and an important link between the phytoplankton and higher trophic levels (Melle et al., 2004), e.g., larvae of NEA cod that feed upon C. finmarchicus nauplii and copepodites (Ellertsen et al., 1989). The C. life cycle consists of an egg stage, 6 nauplii stages (denoted N1 to N6), 5 copepodites stages and the adult stage (male or female). C. finmarchicus usually has a one-year life cycle, but this species can develop more than one generation in warmer regions, as in the southernmost parts of the Norwegian Sea (Broms and Melle, 2007). The reproduction of C. finmarchicus is linked to the seasonal development of the phytoplankton (Melle and Skjoldal, 1998; Stenevik et al., 2007). C. finmarchicus release their eggs in the upper layers of the water column during spring and develop with the spring bloom to reach the overwintering stage (mainly copepodites stage five) in mid-late summer. Overwintering occurs in deep (>500 m) cold water and lasts until late winter, when the overwintered individuals ascend to surface waters to reproduce (Skjoldal et al., 1992).

Numerical Model Components

The Hydrodynamical Model Component

Ocean physics were modeled using the Regional Ocean Modelling System (ROMS). ROMS is a three-dimensional free surface, baroclinic, primitive equations ocean model with topography following s-coordinates in the vertical (Shchepetkin and McWilliams, 2005). In the present study, the Nordic Seas numerical ocean model hindcast (SVIM) archive with 4 km horizontal resolution and 32 sigma coordinates in the vertical was used. It covers the Nordic, Barents and Kara seas and parts of the Arctic Ocean (for further information we refer to Lien et al., 2013, 2016).

The NORWegian ECOlogical Model (NORWECOM)

NORWECOM is a coupled physical, chemical, biological model system (Skogen et al., 1995; Skogen and Søiland, 1998) applied to study primary production, nutrient budgets and dispersion of particles such as fish larvae and pollution. In the present study it was run in offline mode using physics (light, wind, hydrography, horizontal and vertical movement of the water masses) from the SVIM archive. The NORWECOM model includes an ordinary NPZD model with processes such as primary production, respiration, algal death, remineralization of inorganic nutrients from dead organic matter, self-shading, turbidity, sedimentation, resuspension, sediment burial and denitrification. In addition, the model has an IBM for C. finmarchicus (Hjøllo et al., 2012).

The Calanus finmarchicus Individual Based Model

The three-dimensional IBM for C. finmarchicus includes feeding, growth, mortality, movement, reproduction, and adaptive traits that control the interaction with the environment. The entire life cycle of C. finmarchicus is included in the model, resolving the 13 life stages and their features, also including a genetic model algorithm which allows the model to evolve individual traits. Up until the third nauplius stage the development and stage longevity is based on temperature. From the third nauplius stage (N3) C. finmarchicus starts feeding and is 2-way coupled to the NPZD model. Growth is a function of phytoplankton density, temperature and size based on a bioenergetics model. A more detailed description of the model can be found in Hjøllo et al. (2012) and Huse et al. (2018).

The NEA Cod Egg and Larvae Individual Based Model

The IBM for NEA cod eggs and larvae is a Lagrangian dispersal model, and it includes dynamical vertical positioning of eggs dependent on buoyancy and turbulence, prey- and temperature dependent larval growth, predator-prey encounter rates and capture, larvae ingestion rate and metabolism, and larval vertical migration (Vikebø et al., 2005, 2007; Kristiansen et al., 2007).

The NEA cod IBM was run offline based on daily ROMS currents and hydrography, and NORWECOM 2D fields of the C. finmarchicus from the Lagrangian IBM in addition to 3D Eularian fields of mesozooplankton for the period January 15th until September 30th, 2000–2017.

Individual particles were initiated as eggs at 10 known spawning sites along the Norwegian coast (Figure 1 – colored circles; Sundby and Nakken, 2008). While the spawning season lasts from early March until the end of April, we initiated eggs from February 15th to May 15th to enable consideration of conditions also outside the main spawning period. For some of the analysis model results were adjusted according to the observed spawning intensities in space and time (Strand et al., 2017). Specifically, the relative importance of each individual particle was weighted by a gaussian function of spawning date with a peak on April 1st and a standard deviation of 14 days, and by year- and spawning site-specific weights that scaled the spatial relative importance of spawning sites according to egg surveys and observations of spawning adults (following Strand et al., 2017).

A total of one hundred eggs were released at each of the ten spawning sites (SS) per spawning date (SD), amounting to 90 000 particles per year. Particles were released initially as eggs at about 30 m depth. Individual particle position was updated every 30 min according to a 4^th order Runge-Kutta advection scheme and vertical egg positioning in the water column was based on the density difference between the eggs and the ambient water and turbulence (Thygesen and Ådlandsvik, 2007). Eggs were initiated with a buoyancy of 31.25 and a population standard deviation of 0.69 (Sundby, 1997). Individual hatching time followed Geffen et al. (2006)– see Supplementary Information (SI) for details.

After hatching, eggs continued as larvae with an initial weight of 45 μg and a length of approximately 4 mm (Folkvord, 2005). Larvae performed diel vertical migration at a third of a body length per second, ascending during night and descending during day (see Vikebø et al. (2007) for more details). Light decays exponentially with depth and depends on surface irradiance and the attenuation coefficient (see SI for details). Hence, each egg and larva experienced unique abiotic and biotic conditions through the period of pelagic drift.

After hatching, the larvae immediately started feeding in our model, and thus they did not go through the stage of yolk-sac larvae. It is estimated that yolk-sac cod larvae have a duration of 5–7 days in nature. Within this period, the larvae were feeding mostly on nauplii N2, and included nauplii N3 about 10-15 days after hatching depending on temperatures in the range 4-6°C (Supplementary Figure 1).

Larval growth in the IBM was potentially food limited, depending on available prey concentration, the metabolic costs and egestion/excretion losses. Larvae fed on mesozooplankton from the NPZD model and from the C. finmarchicus IBM, which together provided prey field concentrations per stage [ind/m²]. Unlike in the C. finmarchicus IBM, mesozooplankton in the NPZD model is not stage resolved. They were therefore converted to C. finmarchicus equivalents assuming a similar relative stage distribution (see SI for equations and details).

Cod larvae may feed on prey stages limited by their respective gape size, here 8 % of the larval length according to Otterå and Folkvord (1993). Feeding was parameterized according to Fiksen and MacKenzie (2002), already included in an IBM and tested for sensitivity in a numerical study by Kristiansen et al. (2007) - see SI for details. Stomach content [μg] was assumed to reach a maximum of 6 % of the body weight of the larva according to Lough et al. (2005).

Larval growth potential (i.e., growth assuming unlimited food) was limited by temperature according to Folkvord (2005) and may only be reached if sufficient prey is ingested (Supplementary Figure 1) - see SI for details.

The higher the ambient temperature, the higher the metabolic requirements. Consequently, a higher quantity of food is needed. If the food requirement is met the larvae may grow faster and prey composition more quickly diversifies (Supplementary Figure 1). Note that larval weight may decrease while larval length may not. This was also considered in the model.

Data Analyses

Annual averages of individual larval net distance from SS and ambient temperatures 30 days post-spawning were compiled in a scatter plot to indicate inter-annual varying conditions for NEA cod early life stages. In addition, we extracted annual average modeled temperatures during March-August in the upper 50 m of the water column in a polygon (Figure 1, black contour) containing 95 % of 15 days post-hatch (dph) larvae across all years. This calculation allowed inter-annual comparison of environmental conditions independent of egg and larva dispersal trajectories. The polygon extracted mean temperature was used to separate warm and normal years using the median value (Table 1). Here, we used the nomenclature normal years instead of cold years because the temperature anomalies (not shown) for the period from 1921 to 2018 based on the Kola section showed there are no actual cold years in our study period 2000-2017 (Yashayaev and Seidov, 2015).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Mean yearly temperature (T) in the main distribution area of cod larvae (the polygon in Figure 1) from March until August in the upper 50 m in the water column.

Survival

Cumulative survival until the end of the simulation (September 30th) was calculated as a product of several factors. In short, survival at the end of the experiment was the product of survival through hatching, not starving (nonSt), reaching the Barents Sea (inBS), stage-dependent mortality, and size-dependent mortality.

To be considered alive the eggs must have hatched before the end of the simulation. Also, we required the larvae to reach the Barents Sea, the NEA cod nursery grounds, implemented as being east of 19°E. Furthermore, we required that the individuals did not starve at any time throughout the drift period.

Starvation was defined as weighing 20% less than its expected weight (i.e., only temperature dependent weight - potential weight) given its length (see Folkvord (2005) for function relating length and weight). As larvae cannot become shorter, this may occur if larvae are unable to ingest prey that at least match metabolic costs and assimilation losses.

We also calculated stage-specific survival for each individual that accounted for baseline natural mortality from, e.g., predation. Instantaneous natural mortality rates (M) for each stage were: for eggs (M_egg) 0.169 d^–1, for larvae (M_lar) 0.075 d^–1 and for early juveniles (M_eju) 0.023 d^–1 (Langangen et al., 2014b; Bogstad et al., 2016). Individuals were larvae if they were within 4.2 and 24 mm in length and early juveniles within 25 - 99 mm (Herbing et al., 1996; Folkvord, 1997; Hamre, 2006). Cumulative baseline natural mortality as a function of time is therefore;

$$N_t=N_0*ex{p}^{[-M_{egg}*t_{egg}-M_{lar}*t_{lar}-M_{ejuv}*t_{ejuv})]}$$

where the different M’s are daily instantaneous stage-specific mortality rates, N_t is the abundance at time t and N₀ is the abundance at time 0 and t_egg, t_lar and t_ejuv are the number of days spent in the different stages.

We also accounted for size-dependent survival through the first winter. Specifically, we calculated a proxy for size-corrected abundance at age 1 (N_1age) based on the abundance (N_0age) and mean length (L_0age) at the end of the simulation. The size-corrected abundance was calculated for each SS and SD using the following equation: N_1age = N_0age * exp(c₁ * [ln(L_0age) – ln(L_mean)]). Here, the coefficient c₁ = 9.78 was estimated by Stige et al. (2019, Table S6) based on year-class survival of NEA cod through the first winter. The scaling factor L_mean was the mean length of all individuals through all the years in the simulation.

Food Sufficiency Index (FSI)

In addition, we quantified a food sufficiency index (FSI) to find which individuals might have suffered from food limitation but are not food limited enough to be considered starved. FSI reports the fraction of individuals that grew at rates above 90 % of the food-unlimited temperature dependent growth potential for more than 90 % of the time until the end of the simulation. The FSI was included as a more sensitive measure than starvation of food-limitations on larval growth through the planktonic stages.

Results

Drift and Development of Egg and Yolk-Sac Larvae

Egg stage duration until hatching varies with ambient temperatures, which in turn depends on SS, SD, year, and individual drift trajectory. Individuals spawned late and to the south generally experience higher temperatures (∼ 7.0 ± 0.3 °C) than those spawned to the north (∼ 4.8 ± 0.2 °C) (Figure 2A), while inter-annual variability (Figure 2B) is highest early in the season likely because of variation in the onset of seasonal heating. Individuals originating from SS 4 (inside the Lofoten archipelago) experience anomalously low ambient temperatures (∼ 4.9 ± 0.4°C) (Figure 2C) compared with other SS at similar latitudes, likely because of less influence of relatively warm Atlantic Water, retention, and runoff. Warm years generally result in less variable ambient temperatures between SSs, with 2012 as a good example.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. (A) Mean modeled ambient temperature of eggs until hatching from 2000 to 2017 by spawning site and spawning date. (B) Corresponding standard deviation for between-year variation of temperature. (C) Time series of annual mean ambient temperatures until hatching from 2000 to 2017 (black line connecting x’s) along with the annual mean ambient spawning site specific temperatures (colored circles).

Duration of the egg stage affects both the time and location in which the larvae start feeding. With average egg stage duration of 18.7 ± 5.3 (s.d.) days in our model and yolk sac absorption (not included in the model) of another 5–7 days the first feeding of larvae typically occurs within the first 30 days after spawning. Low ambient temperatures (< 4.5 °C) experienced by the offspring correspond to long distance traveled, while elevated ambient temperatures (> 4.5°C) may correspond to a variety of mean distances from SS (Figure 3). The association between low ambient temperature and long distance traveled may be linked to a general trend of decreasing temperature with increasing distance from the spawning grounds. The absence of clear dispersal patterns for the individuals experiencing higher ambient temperatures is likely due to more variable circulation features. We believe that due to a constant NCC, low ambient temperatures result in a prolonged drift period until 30 days after spawning and a longer distance traveled from the SS. In warmer years (annual average polygon temperatures) the individuals generally experience higher ambient (5.2 ± 0.3°C) temperatures along their drift routes than in normal years (4.6 ± 0.1°C). In 2004, the individuals on average travelled the farthest (∼ 198 km), more than double the distance traveled in the year 2000 (∼ 91 km).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Annual mean net distance from spawning sites to positions of eggs or larvae thirty days after spawning and corresponding ambient temperatures along the drift routes. Note that these values are weighted according to the temporal and spatial spawning intensity (see Materials and Methods). The size of the circles represents the yearly mean egg stage duration, while the numbers denote the year in the simulation period. Years in red and blue denote warm and normal, respectively.

Feeding Conditions for Larvae

In our simulation results, the peak timing in the abundance of larvae at 15 dph in the polygon occurred on average about 15 days before the peak timing of prey of suitable size (Figure 4). Abundance of 15 dph larvae appear on average 8 days later in normal than warm years (Figure 4, solid lines). Meanwhile, prey abundance of suitable sizes peaks almost at the same time in warm and normal years (Figure 4, dashed lines), but the abundance of prey is on average 31% lower in normal years than in warm years (non-significantly lower, t = 1.17, p = 0.28). C. finmarchicus nauplii at stage N3 constitutes a major part of the food of the correct size for cod larvae at this age (Supplementary Figure 3), and the seasonal curve for N3 abundance resembles the seasonal curve in prey of suitable size (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Mean seasonal pattern in abundances of cod larvae at 15 days post hatch (unbroken lines), all prey of suitable size for the larvae (dashed lines) and the dominant prey C. finmarchicus nauplii stage N3 (dotted lines). The mean values were calculated for the main distribution area of cod larvae (the polygon in Figure 1) for warm (red) and normal (blue) years. The shading for larval and prey abundances shows the interannual variation (± 1 standard deviation) for warm or normal years. The lines have been smoothed by a moving mean of 5 days to emphasize trends. For a detailed year by year curves with the mean for all years see Supplementary Figure 2.

Match between larvae and suitable prey is higher for warm years than normal years (Figure 4 - area below intersection of solid and broken red lines vs. blue lines; for interannual variability see Supplementary Figure 3). Both normal and warm years (e.g., 2003 and 2002) may have higher abundances of N3 than the mean, and curiously, the year 2016 (warm) presented a delayed peak of N3 as compared to other years (Supplementary Figure 2B). Elevated abundances of C. finmarchicus progress northwards along the coast with time before becoming limited to only the southern part of the model domain from early June and onwards (Supplementary Figures 2A,C). In higher latitudes it is possible to observe two peaks of elevated C. finmarchicus N3 concentrations (Supplementary Figure 2A - area I and II), whereas in the southernmost area III, C. finmarchicus N3 is available throughout the entire simulated months.

Mechanisms of Survival of the Early Juveniles

The FSI shows that on average early spawned larvae experience sufficient and suitable prey conditions to support growth according to their temperature potential (Figure 5A). Later in the year, as temperature and thereby prey requirements increase, larvae experience growth limited by food availability, and this is particularly strong for late spawning far south. FSI is more variable for the individuals spawned far south and early in the spawning season, and at all spawning sites for those spawned around the main spawning period from late March to early April (Figure 5B).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Fraction of individuals that grow 90% or more than their temperature-dependent potential if the prey is unlimited for more than 90% of the time since hatching until the 30th of September (food sufficiency index), per spawning site and spawning date. (A) Mean and (B) standard deviation. Blank spaces represent no individuals (food sufficiency index = 0).

Mean ambient temperature along egg and larval drift routes and the FSI have a negative relationship (Figure 6A). Consistently, most warm years, according to mean polygon temperature from March – August (Table 1), tend to have a lower FSI, while normal years tend to have a higher FSI (Figure 6A). Note, however, that 2012 and 2017 are warm years, with median ambient temperatures along drift routes and high FSI. Larval length (and weight - not shown) against FSI (Figure 6B) displays similar patterns as for ambient temperature against FSI (Figure 6A). Larval length (and weight – not shown) is positively correlated with ambient temperature (Figure 6C).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. (A,B) Annual mean food sufficiency index weighted by spawning intensity vs. ambient temperature and length also weighted by spawning intensity at September 30th. (C) Annual mean ambient temperature vs. length along with the 95 % confidence interval for the regression. Red are warm years and blue are normal years.

Modeled stage-specific cumulative survival until the 0-age group displays little variation between years. Slightly elevated survival occurs in 2002 (warm), 2007 (warm), 2010 (normal) and 2013 (normal) (Figure 7 – yellow line with triangles). Adding the requirement of also reaching the Barents Sea makes little difference, except for slightly reduced survival in 2011 (Figure 7 – light green line with triangles). If starvation is considered fatal, survival decreases resulting in particularly low survival in 2010, 2011 (normal) and 2013 (Figure 7 – dark green line with diamonds). If also accounting for size-dependent survival through the first winter from age 0 to age 1 (Stige et al., 2019), survival decreases even further still, resulting in particularly low survival in the same years as before (Figure 7 – green petrol line with filled diamonds). The calculated survival to age 1 and the field data for the 0-age group (age-0 fish per spawning stock biomass) have a non-significant weak negative correlation (r = −0.12, p = 0.64). However, although also non-significant, calculated survival to age one is weakly positively correlated with recruitment success at age three (recruits per spawning stock biomass, from assessment reports of the Arctic Fisheries Working Group (ICES, 2020), r = 0.29, p = 0.25). The recruitment at age 3 showed a long-term decline through the study period, which was not seen in the age-0 data or in the modeled survival (Figure 7). Short-term variability in survival to age-1 and recruitment, represented by year-to-year differences, were also non-significantly weakly positively correlated (r = 0.07, p = 0.78).

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. Cumulative modeled survival until the 30th of September only including fixed stage-specific mortality rates (yellow line with upside-down triangles), also adding requirement that individuals need to reach the Barents Sea (green with triangles), also requiring that individuals do not starve (dark green with open diamond) and including size-dependent survival until age 1 (blue line with filled diamonds). For comparison we show observed 0-age group abundance divided by spawning stock biomass (purple line with filled squares) and abundance of 3-year olds from Virtual Population Analysis back-calculated to spawning year divided by spawning stock biomass (SSB - dark blue line with filled circles). Units for the latter two variables are thousands per tones, data from the ICES (2020).

Correlations Between Key Variables Concerning Cod Survival and Prey Interactions

Cumulative modeled survival to age 1 is negatively correlated with the FSI (r = −0.72, p < 0.001), positively correlated with modeled 0-age length (r = 0.87, p < 0.001) and weight (r = 0.98, p < 0.001) and significantly positively correlated with the annual peak abundance of C. finmarchicus N3 available to 15 dph larvae (r = 0.58, p = 0.01) (Figure 8). Weight correlates negatively with the FSI (r = −0.67, p = 0.002), positively with N3 abundance (r = 0.56, p = 0.017) and positively with length (as weight and length are functionally interlinked here). Length on the other hand correlates positively with starvation (r = 0.66, p = 0.003) and negatively with the FSI (r = −0.49, p = 0.045).

FIGURE 8

Figure 8. Correlation matrix between variables that indicate survival and match-mismatch between the cod larvae 15 days post-hatch within the polygon and their prey of correct size, Calanus finmarchicus (C. fin) nauplii stage III (N3) abundance, larval length and weight at the end of simulation (30th of September) and survival from the egg stage to age 1 (accounting for size-dependent survival through the first winter). Temperature included in this analysis is the mean temperature from March until August within the main distribution area of cod larvae (the polygon in Figure 1) and it is based on the ocean model. DOY corresponds to the day of the year where highest abundance was observed.

The latitudes of NEA cod larvae at 15 dph are significantly positively correlated with starvation (r = 0.51, p = 0.03) and with 0-age length (r = 0.52, p = 0.03). The strong correlation between larval latitude and longitude is because of the northeasterly orientation of the coast between spawning and nursery grounds.

The day of the year with the highest larvae abundance naturally correlates positively with their mean latitude (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and longitude 15 dph (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) because a prolonged stage duration allows a longer drift period until the date of 15 dph. The time difference between peak abundance of 15 dph cod larvae and C. finmarchicus N3 is positively correlated with northward drift and day of peak abundance C. finmarchicus N3. Peak abundance of 15 dph larvae is on average 15 days prior to the peak of C. finmarchicus N3 and a delayed peak indicates a prolonged egg stage duration and therefore prolonged dispersal time to reach 15 dph. Latitude of the highest concentration of N3 has a positive correlation with cod survival to age 1 (r = 0.5, p = 0.035).

Discussion

Key Findings and Implications

The results presented here shed light on the processes and mechanisms that affect larval growth, distribution and survival from NEA cod egg and larval stages until arrival of juveniles in their nursery grounds in the Barents Sea and through the first winter by considering previously established empirical-based size-dependent survival prospects. Using a coupled ocean hydrodynamical model, a NPZD model including a C. finmarchicus IBM and an IBM for pelagic stages of NEA cod, it was possible to analyse the importance of abiotic conditions and food availability for growth and survival through all early life stages until settlement of juveniles at nursery grounds in the Barents Sea for 18 consecutive years. Observational-based abundance estimates were also added at multiple stages and statistical correlations were performed with the modeled larval abundances. In comparison a similar study focused on hydrodynamical processes along the coast that affect spatial-temporal overlap between NEA cod larvae and prey for a few selected years (Vikebø et al., 2021). On the whole, the two studies provide complimentary information on key physical processes along the Norwegian coast that are important to NEA cod larvae feeding and to what extent combined biophysical models may predict the population size at different development stages.

We found that the time of peak abundance of 15 dph larvae is around two weeks before the peak timing of prey, with considerable interannual variability both in timing and amplitude. Because of this mismatch in peak timing, the NEA cod larvae seem to depend more strongly on the time of the increase in prey concentration than on the time of peak or decrease in prey. A delay between cod larvae and their prey is consistent with observations from Vestfjorden in the Lofoten archipelago, where an early peak of C. finmarchicus copepodite stage C1 in warm years tended to coincide with large mean size of NEA cod larvae around 15 dph, presumably because of a good temporal match between predators and prey (Ellertsen et al., 1987, 1989; Cushing, 1990).

Most larvae grow at or close to their temperature potential except for late-spawned individuals. Late spawned cod eggs hatch into first-feeding larvae with better temporal match with suitable prey, at the same time as seasonal heating allows for a higher growth potential and thereby elevated feeding requirements to support growth and metabolic costs. In fact, our model results show that fast-growing larvae experience more often insufficient prey conditions to match their growth potential depending on their size and ambient temperature. March - August mean temperature during the early life stages of NEA cod in the core area of appearance has positive correlations with the length and weight at 0-age (r = 0.80, p < 0.001; r = 0.88, p < 0.001, respectively) and a negative correlation with the FSI (r = −0.62, p = 0.005). This is also the reason why they are more prone to experience starvation as they have elevated metabolic costs and therefore require an elevated steady supply of suitable prey which in our model is not always available. However, the reward of finding sufficient food is rapid growth and high cumulative survival.

First-feeding and young larvae depend on a narrow selection of C. finmarchicus stages. The results here show that the abundances of prey for these stages are still significantly affecting NEA cod weight and survival at the 0-age group and 1-year old individuals. Our results further suggest that this association at the population level is mainly driven by the food conditions experienced by a minority of individuals that have high growth potential because of high temperatures, as these are the ones that are potentially food-limited. Despite having sufficient food, the individuals that originate from early spawning and northern spawning grounds develop slowly and have low survival because of low ambient temperatures. Individuals that originate from late spawning and southern spawning grounds have higher growth potential because of higher temperature, but also higher risks of food limitation and of not reaching the Barents Sea nursery grounds. An implication of this spatial heterogeneity in which mechanisms regulate growth and survival is that the dynamics are not necessarily well represented by spatially averaged data (as pointed out by, e.g., Ciannelli et al., 2008). For example, average food and temperature conditions may not be the most relevant for year-class survival, but rather food levels in the water masses with high temperature.

Dispersal to the north is necessary to reach the NEA cod nursery grounds but also impose an enhanced risk of mismatch because suitable C. finmarchicus nauplii abundance is only present at the shelf towards the entrance to the Barents Sea during a much more limited period than farther south. This is likely also the explanation why we find a positive correlation between larval latitude and starvation. During spring (April - May) C. finmarchicus N3 individuals are abundant both inside the polygon encompassing 95 % of 15 dph cod larvae and even farther north. However, toward summer (June-July) C. finmarchicus N3 are almost absent in the polygon and farther north, and only present at latitudes farther south.

We find that the southern spawned eggs from spawning from around late March to mid-April have the highest survival, but also the highest variability between years. This spatial gradient is different from what we would expect as observed spawning is centered around Lofoten (SS 3-5) but indicates that there are additional drivers that shape spawning behavior not addressed in our model. Such drivers could be spawning migration costs (e.g., Jørgensen et al., 2008), spatial patterns in predation pressure (Langangen et al., 2016) and predation avoidance (e.g., Husebø et al., 2009). The seasonal pattern in modeled offspring survival resembles the seasonal pattern in the spawning of NEA cod (peaking around 1st of April, Ottersen et al., 2014), supporting that this timing provides the best balance for offspring to be spawned late enough to benefit from high temperature and fast development but early enough to reach the Barents Sea and have enough food to take advantage of the high growth potential (consistent with, e.g., Kristiansen et al., 2007).

Temperature and Prey, and Their Effects on Growth and Survival

Our findings are consistent with literature indicating that low temperatures result in prolonged stage duration and enhanced mortality independent of prey availability (Pepin et al., 1997; Otterlei et al., 1999). Most larvae are not food-limited within our model simulations. It is mainly the late- and southern-spawned larvae that experience food limitation. The high temperatures these larvae experience imply that the larvae require higher food concentration than other larvae to grow optimally. High temperatures have the potential to secure rapid growth and development (Daewel et al., 2011) and thereby to reduce the number of potential predators, but success requires high food abundance, otherwise high temperatures may be prejudicial (Fouzai et al., 2015). Our results suggest that late-spawned larvae experience higher prey abundance in warm than normal years, but that the food requirements increase more than the food concentrations, leading to increasing food limitations on growth. The food limitations are, however, not so large that the high temperatures are prejudicial for survival.

We find in our model results that the bigger the size at 0-age the higher the survival from spawning to age 1. However, the modeled survival is weakly but positively correlated with recruitment success at age 3 and not significantly, so it is not possible to establish a linear relation between modeled survival and recruitment success. Yet, it is known that larger mean size of larvae and juveniles is associated with higher survival through the first winter and recruitment later at age 3 (Ottersen and Loeng, 2000; Stige et al., 2015, 2019). Growing fast and becoming bigger may increase survival because individuals have outgrown their predator diet size range, due to enhanced ability to escape predators, and to the ability to exploit a wider size range of prey (Cushing, 1995). Larger individuals tend to have higher energy reserves and to be more resilient to starvation than smaller individuals, and a larger body size can also be an advantage when dealing with physical stress (Sogard, 1997; Marteinsdottir and Steinarsson, 1998).

Match-Mismatch

We observe a difference in mean time of peak abundance of 15 dph larvae and their suitable prey, but apparently prey availability does not limit survival or growth of most larvae until the 0-age group. In our model we observe that at the date of peak abundance of 15 dph larvae, the maximum concentration of C. finmarchicus is a little below the minimum concentration found by Cushing (1990, page 280), who writes “Above a density of 5 nauplii/L, the cod larvae are well fed.” On the other hand, Folkvord (2005) found that most NEA cod larvae in the sea have a size that is near the maximum for their temperature, suggesting that surviving larvae have not suffered food limitation. Our findings are in accordance with Folkvord (2005), and apparently small larvae need less than 5 ind/L to survive without food limitations.

Our results partly support previous studies that have suggested that in warm years, NEA cod larvae grow and survive better than in cold years because of a better temporal match between the first-feeding larvae and their prey (Ellertsen et al., 1987, 1989; Cushing, 1990). Our results are consistent with empirical findings that C. finmarchicus nauplii abundance in spring is higher in warm than normal or cold years (Kvile et al., 2014; Stige et al., 2015), but do not support temperature-driven shifts in the peak timing of the nauplii (Ellertsen et al., 1987, 1989) and also show large variability in nauplii levels between years with similar temperatures. Our results are also consistent with empirical findings that link high nauplii levels in spring with large size of NEA cod larvae (Ellertsen et al., 1987, 1989; Cushing, 1990; Stige et al., 2015) and between large larval and juvenile size and high survival to later ages (Ottersen and Loeng, 2000; Stige et al., 2015, 2019). Our model results thereby support that the statistical associations between temperature and recruitment through match-mismatch dynamics have a mechanistic basis, but also highlight that these associations are complex and involve temperature-dependent interactions between processes at different spatial and temporal scales.

Model Refinements, Sensitivity to the Results and Future Studies

The current parameterization in the NEA cod IBM includes egg buoyancy but does not differentiate between eggs according to quality and size as a function of e.g., spawning time or spawning adult conditions. An increased egg diameter supports bigger hatched larvae and has positive effects also on yolk-sac larvae (Pepin et al., 1997). However, egg development, time to hatch, size of the larvae at hatching and time of yolk absorption are more significantly affected by temperature than by egg size (Pepin et al., 1997; Steinarsson and Björnsson, 1999). Since biological parameters for the egg and larva development are more affected by temperature than by egg size, we believe our model provides a fair representation of the natural world.

The success of the feeding process and prey selection depend on many parameters such as prey encounter rate, prey, and predator (larvae) size, light, capture success, ingestion rate, prey selection and others. Wind generated turbulence may also affect feeding conditions. Turbulence contributes to the maintenance of the larvae at depths where there is less predation risk than closer to the surface, and that also increases prey encounter rates, suggesting that turbulence can be important to avoid starvation of first-feeding larvae, especially in low prey densities (Sundby, 1997; Kristiansen et al., 2014). On the other hand, turbulence can have a detrimental impact on encounter rates when being too high through the advection of the prey out of the visual range of the larvae (Fiksen and MacKenzie, 2002). Turbulence is not included in the cod larvae IBM used in this study. As food seems to be limiting growth only for the late spawned individuals, we believe that turbulence-enhanced predator-prey contact rates would only have importance for these individuals.

Predation and cannibalism mortality varies in space and time and consequently can affect the spatio-temporal dynamics of survival and future recruitment. These sources of mortality are not included in the models coupled here. The natural mortality rates of NEA cod larvae have been found to vary spatially (Langangen et al., 2014a). In this regard, it is important to understand the spatial heterogeneity of mortality and survival. Age-0 NEA cod has decreased survival when the overlap between juvenile and adult cod increases, likely due to cannibalism (Ciannelli et al., 2007). For the Atlantic cod stock in the North Sea, not only the number of predators is important, but also how they are distributed and at what larval life stage they affect survival rates (Akimova et al., 2019). Akimova et al. (2019) also highlights the importance of the patchiness distribution of both predators and prey.

The predator-prey interaction occurs at much finer spatial-temporal scales in marine ecosystems than the scales modeled here, which can cause uncertainty in predator-prey interactions. Considering the uncertainty in predator-prey and cannibalism interactions mentioned above, it is important to ponder adding further biological features to the early life stages of individuals, as well as further sources of mortality. As topics of future studies, we also suggest analyzing the effect of the spawning adult stock and the variation in demographic characteristics and how this can affect growth and survival of the offspring.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be made available upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

CE contributed with evaluation of model, model analyses, and writing of the manuscript. MS contributed with model runs and model analysis. LS, LC, and FV contributed with constructive discussions, suggestions for model analysis and feedback on the manuscript writing. All authors contributed to the work and contributed to the discussions of hypothesis, methods, and results.

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway (project number 280468) under the project “Drivers and effects of Spatial shifts in early life stages of marine fish (SpaceShift).” The simulations were performed on resources provided by UNINETT Sigma2—the National Infrastructure for High-Performance Computing and Data Storage in Norway under grant NN2984K.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.767290/full#supplementary-material

References

Akimova, A., Hufnagl, M., and Peck, M. A. (2019). Spatiotemporal dynamics of predators and survival of marine fish early life stages: atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the North Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 176:102121. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102121

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bogstad, B., Yaragina, N. A., and Nash, R. D. M. (2016). The early life-history dynamics of Northeast Arctic cod: levels of natural mortality and abundance during the first 3 years of life. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 73, 246–256. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0093

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Broms, C., and Melle, W. (2007). Seasonal development of Calanus finmarchicus in relation to phytoplankton bloom dynamics in the Norwegian Sea. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 54, 2760–2775. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.08.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciannelli, L., Dingsør, G. E., Bogstad, B., Ottersen, G., Chan, K. S., Gjøsæter, H., et al. (2007). Spatial anatomy of species survival: effects of predation and climate-driven environmental variability. Ecology 88, 635–646. doi: 10.1890/05-2035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciannelli, L., Fauchald, P., Chan, K. S., Agostini, V. N., and Dingsør, G. E. (2008). Spatial fisheries ecology: recent progress and future prospects. J. Mar. Syst. 71, 223–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.02.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cushing, D. (1995). Population Production and Regulation in the Sea: A Fisheries Pesperctive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Cushing, D. H. (1969). The Regularity of the spawning season of some fishes. J. Mar. Sci. 33, 81–92. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/33.1.81

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cushing, D. H. (1990). Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: an update of the match/mismatch hypothesis. Adv. Mar. Biol. 26, 249–293. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60202-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daewel, U., Peck, M. A., and Schrum, C. (2011). Life history strategy and impacts of environmental variability on early life stages of two marine fishes in the North Sea: an individual-based modelling approach. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68, 426–443. doi: 10.1139/F10-164

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dalpadado, P., Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. L., Rune Skjoldal, H., Bagøien, E., Dolgov, A., et al. (2020). Climate effects on temporal and spatial dynamics of phytoplankton and zooplankton in the Barents Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 185:102320. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2020.102320

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dalpadado, P., Bogstad, B., Eriksen, E., and Rey, L. (2009). Distribution and diet of 0-group cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in the Barents Sea in relation to food availability and temperature. Polar Biol. 32, 1583–1596. doi: 10.1007/s00300-009-0657-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Durant, J. M., Hjermann, D., Ottersen, G., and Stenseth, N. C. (2007). Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. Clim. Res. 33, 271–283. doi: 10.3354/cr033271

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellertsen, B., Fossum, P., Solemdal, P., and Sundby, S. (1989). Relation between temperature and survival of eggs and first-feeding larvae of northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Cons. int. Explor. M er 191, 209–219.

Google Scholar

Ellertsen, B., Fossum, P., Solemdal, P., Sundby, S., and Tilseth, S. (1987). “The effect of biological and physical factors on the survival of Arcto-Norwegian cod and the influence on recruitment variability,” in The Effect of Oceanographic Conditions on the Distribution and Population Dynamics of Commercial Fish Stocks in the Barents Sea. Proceedings of the 3rd Soviet-Norwegian Symposium Murmansk, 26–28 May 1986, ed H. Loeng (Bergen: Institute of Marine Research), 101–126.

Google Scholar

Ferreira, A. S. A., Stige, L. C., Neuheimer, A. B., Bogstad, B., Yaragina, N., Prokopchuk, I., et al. (2020). Match - mismatch dynamics in the Norwegian - Barents Sea system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 650, 81–94.

Google Scholar

Fiksen, Ø, and MacKenzie, B. R. (2002). Process-based models of feeding and prey selection in larval fish. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 243, 151–164. doi: 10.3354/meps243151

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folkvord, A. (1997). “Ontogeny of cannibalism in larval and juvenile fishes with special emphasis on Atlantic cod,” in Early Life History and Recruitment in Fish Populations, eds R. C. Chambers and E. A. Trippel (Dordrecht: Springer), 251–278. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1439-1_9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folkvord, A. (2005). Comparison of size-at-age of larval Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from different populations based on size- and temperature-dependent growth models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 1037–1052. doi: 10.1139/f05-008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fossheim, M., Primicerio, R., Johannesen, E., Ingvaldsen, R. B., Aschan, M. M., and Dolgov, A. V. (2015). Recent warming leads to a rapid borealization of fish communities in the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 673–677. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2647

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fouzai, N., Opdal, A. F., Jørgensen, C., and Fiksen, Ø (2015). Effects of temperature and food availability on larval cod survival: a model for behaviour in vertical gradients. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 529, 199–212. doi: 10.3354/meps11326

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallego, A., North, E. W., and Houde, E. D. (2012). Understanding and quantifying mortality in pelagic, early life stages of marine organisms – Old challenges and new perspectives. J. Mar. Syst. 93, 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.10.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Geffen, A. J., Fox, C. J., and Nash, R. D. M. (2006). Temperature-dependent development rates of cod Gadus morhua eggs. J. Fish Biol. 69, 1060–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01181.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamre, K. (2006). Nutrition in cod (Gadus morhua) larvae and juveniles. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 63, 267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.11.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hare, J. A. (2014). The future of fisheries oceanography lies in the pursuit of multiple hypotheses. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 2343–2356.

Google Scholar

Herbing, I. H. V., Miyake, T., Hall, B. K., and Boutilier, R. G. (1996). Ontogeny of feeding and respirantion in larval Atlantic cod Gadus morhua (Teleostei, Gadiformes): I. Morphology. J. Morphol. 227, 15–35.

Google Scholar

Hjøllo, S. S., Huse, G., Skogen, M. D., and Melle, W. (2012). Modelling secondary production in the Norwegian Sea with a fully coupled physical/primary production/individual-based Calanus finmarchicus model system. Mar. Biol. Res. 8, 508–526. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2011.642805

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hjort, J. (1914). Fluctuations in the Great Fisheries of Northen Europe Viewed in the Light of Biological Research. Rapports et Procès – Verbaux. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Host & Sons.

Google Scholar

Höffle, H., Solemdal, P., Korsbrekke, K., Johannessen, M., Bakkeplasss, K., and Kjesbu, O. S. (2014). Variability of northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua) distribution on the main spawning grounds in relation to biophysical factors. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 1317–1331.

Google Scholar

Houde, E. D. (2008). Emerging from Hjort’s shadow. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 41, 53–70. doi: 10.2960/J.v41.m634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huse, G., Melle, W., Skogen, M. D., Hjøllo, S. S., Svendsen, E., and Budgell, W. P. (2018). Modeling emergent life histories of copepods. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6:23. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Husebø, Å, Stenevik, E. K., Slotte, A., Fossum, P., Salthaug, A., Vikebø, F., et al. (2009). Effects of hatching time on year-class strength in Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, 1710–1717. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsp150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ICES (2020). Arctic Fisheries Working Group (AFWG). ICES Scientific Reports. Copenhagen: ICES.

Google Scholar

Jørgensen, C., Dunlop, E. S., Opdal, A. F., and Fiksen, Ø (2008). The evolution of spawning migrations: state dependence and fishing-induced changes. Ecology 89, 3436–3448. doi: 10.1890/07-1469.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T., Fiksen, Ø, and Folkvord, A. (2007). Modelling feeding, growth, and habitat selection in larval Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua): observations and model predictions in a macrocosm environment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 136–151. doi: 10.1139/F06-176

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T., Vikebø, F., Sundby, S., Huse, G., and Fiksen, Ø (2009). Modeling growth of larval cod (Gadus morhua) in large-scale seasonal and latitudinal environmental gradients. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 56, 2001–2011. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.11.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kristiansen, T., Vollset, K. W., Sundby, S., and Vikebø, F. B. (2014). Turbulence enhances feeding of larval cod at low prey densities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 9, 2515–2529.

Google Scholar

Kvile, K. Ø, Dalpadado, P., Orlova, E., Stenseth, N. C., and Stige, L. C. (2014). Temperature effects on Calanus finmarchicus vary in space, time and between developmental stages. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 517, 85–104. doi: 10.3354/meps11024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langangen, Ø, Färber, L., Stige, L. C., Diekert, F. K., Barth, J. M. I, Matschiner, M., et al. (2019). Ticket to spawn: combining economic and genetic data to evaluate the effect of climate and demographic structure on spawning distribution in Atlantic cod. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 134–143. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14474

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langangen, Ø, Ottersen, G., Ciannelli, L., Vikebø, F. B., and Stige, L. C. (2016). Reproductive strategy of a migratory fish stock: implications of spatial variations in natural mortality. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 73, 1742–1749. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langangen, Ø, Stige, L. C., Yaragina, N. A., Vikebø, F. B., Bogstad, B., and Gusdal, Y. (2014b). Egg mortality of northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammues aegleginus). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 1129–1136.

Google Scholar

Langangen, Ø, Stige, L. C., Yaragina, N. A., Ottersen, G., Vikebø, F. B., and Stenseth, N. C. (2014a). Spatial variations in mortality in pelagic early life stages of a marine fish (Gadus morhua). Prog. Oceanogr. 127, 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.06.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lien, V. S., Gusdal, Y., Albretsen, J., Melsom, A., and Vikebø, F. B. (2013). Evaluation of a Nordic Seas 4 km Numerical Ocean Model Hindcast Archive (SVIM), 1960-2011. Fisken og Havet, 7-2013. Bergen: Havforskningsinstituttet.

Google Scholar

Lien, V. S., Hjøllo, S. S., Skogen, M. D., Svendsen, E., Wehde, H., Bertino, L., et al. (2016). An assessment of the added value from data assimilation on modelled Nordic Seas hydrography and ocean transports. Ocean Model. 99, 43–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.12.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lough, R. G., Buckley, L. J., Werner, F. E., Quinlan, J. A., and Pehrson Edwards, K. (2005). A general biophysical model of larval cod (Gadus morhua) growth applied to populations on Georges Bank. Fish. Oceanogr. 14, 241–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00330.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marteinsdottir, G., and Steinarsson, A. (1998). Maternal influence on the size and viability of Iceland cod Gadus morhua eggs and larvae. J. Fish Biol. 52, 1241–1258. doi: 10.1006/jfbi.1998.0670

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melle, W., Ellertsen, B., and Skjoldal, H. R. (2004). “Zooplankton: the link to higher trophic levels,” in The Norwegian Sea ecosystem, ed. H. R. Skjoldal (Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press), 559.

Google Scholar

Melle, W., and Skjoldal, H. R. (1998). Reproduction and development of Calanus finmarchicus, C. glacialis and C. hyperboreus in the Barents Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 169, 211–228. doi: 10.3354/meps169211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Opdal, A. F., and Jørgensen, C. (2015). Long-term change in a behavioural trait: truncated spawning distribution and demography in Northeast Arctic cod. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1521–1530. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Opdal, A. F., Vikebø, F. B., and Fiksen, Ø (2008). Relationships between spawning ground identity, latitude and early life thermal exposure in Northeast Arctic cod. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 41, 13–22. doi: 10.2960/J.v41.m621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otterå, H., and Folkvord, A. (1993). Allometric growth in juvenile cod (Gadus morhua) and possible effects on cannibalism. J. Fish Biol. 43, 643–645. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00447.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otterlei, E., Nyhammer, G., Folkvord, A., and Stefansson, S. O. (1999). Temperature- and size-dependent growth of larval and early juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua): a comparative study of Norwegian coastal cod and northeast Arctic cod. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 2099–2111. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-56-11-2099

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ottersen, G., Bogstad, B., Yaragina, N. A., Stige, L. C., Vikebø, F. B., and Dalpadado, P. (2014). A review of early life history dynamics of Barents Sea cod (Gadus morhua). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 2064–2087.

Google Scholar

Ottersen, G., and Loeng, H. (2000). Covariability in early growth and year-class strength of Barents Sea cod, haddock, and herring: the environmental link. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 339–348. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.1999.0529

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Payne, M. R., Hatfield, E. M. C., Dickey-Collas, M., Falkenhaug, T., Gallego, A., Gröger, J., et al. (2009). Recruitment in a changing environment: the 2000s North Sea herring recruitment failure. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, 272–277. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pepin, P., Orr, D. C., and Anderson, J. T. (1997). Time to hatch and larval size in relation to temperature and egg size in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 2–10. doi: 10.1139/f96-154

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sandø, A. B., Johansen, G. O., Aglen, A., Stiansen, J. E., and Renner, A. H. H. (2020). Climate change and new potential spawning sites for Northeast Arctic cod. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:28. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shchepetkin, A. F., and McWilliams, J. C. (2005). The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Model. 9, 347–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skagseth, Ø, Slotte, A., Stenevik, E. K., and Nash, R. D. M. (2015). Characteristics of the Norwegian coastal current during years with high recruitment of Norwegian spring spawning herring (Clupea harengus L.). PLoS One 10:e0144117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skjoldal, H. R., Gjosaeter, H., and Loeng, H. (1992). The Barents Sea ecosystem in the 1980s: ocean climate, plankton, and capelin growth. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 195, 278–290.

Google Scholar

Skogen, M. D., and Søiland, H. (1998). A User’s Guide to NORWECON V2.0: The Norwegian Ecological Model System. Bergen: Fisken og Havet.

Google Scholar

Skogen, M. D., Svendsen, E., Berntsen, J., Aksnes, D., and Ulvestad, K. B. (1995). Modelling the primary production in the North Sea using a coupled three-dimensional physical-chemical-biological ocean model. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 41, 545–565.

Google Scholar

Sogard, S. M. (1997). Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: a review. Bull. Mar. Sci. 60, 1129–1157.

Google Scholar

Steinarsson, A., and Björnsson, B. (1999). The effects of temperature and size on growth and mortality of cod larvae. J. Fish Biol. 55, 100–109. doi: 10.1006/jfbi.1999.1053

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stenevik, E. K., Melle, W., Gaard, E., Gislason, A., Broms, C. T., Prokopchuk, I., et al. (2007). Egg production of Calanus finmarchicus-A basin-scale study. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 54, 2672–2685. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.08.027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stige, L. C., Langangen, Ø, Yaragina, N. A., Vikebø, F. B., Bogstad, B., Ottersen, G., et al. (2015). Combined statistical and mechanistic modelling suggests food and temperature effects on survival of early life stages of Northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua). Prog. Oceanogr. 134, 138–151. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stige, L. C., Rogers, L. A., Neuheimer, A. B., Hunsicker, M. E., Yaragina, N. A., Ottersen, G., et al. (2019). Density- and size-dependent mortality in fish early life stages. Fish Fish. 20, 962–976. doi: 10.1111/faf.12391

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stige, L. C., Yaragina, N. A., Langangen, Ø, Bogstad, B., Stenseth, N. C., and Ottersen, G. (2017). Effect of a fish stock’s demographic structure on offspring survival and sensitivity to climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 1347–1352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621040114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Strand, K. O., Sundby, S., Albretsen, J., and Vikebø, F. B. (2017). The Northeast Greenland Shelf as a Potential Habitat for the Northeast Arctic Cod. Front. Mar. Sci. 4:304. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sundby, S. (1997). Turbulence and ichthyoplankton: influence on vertical distributions and encounter rates. Sci. Mar. 61, 159–176.

Google Scholar

Sundby, S., and Nakken, O. (2008). Spatial shifts in spawning habitats of Arcto-Norwegian cod related to multidecadal climate oscillations and climate change. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 953–962.

Google Scholar

Thygesen, U. H., and Ådlandsvik, B. (2007). Simulating vertical turbulent dispersal with finite volumes and binned random walks. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 347, 145–153. doi: 10.3354/meps06975

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toresen, R., Skjoldal, H. R., Vikebø, F., and Martinussen, M. B. (2019). Sudden change in long-term ocean climate fluctuations corresponds with ecosystem alterations and reduced recruitment in Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus, Clupeidae). Fish Fish. 20, 686–696. doi: 10.1111/faf.12369

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vikebø, F., Jørgensen, C., Kristiansen, T., and Fiksen, Ø (2007). Drift, growth, and survival of larval Northeast Arctic cod with simple rules of behaviour. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 347, 207–219. doi: 10.3354/meps06979

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vikebø, F., Sundby, S., Ådlandsvik, B., and Fiksen, Ø (2005). The combined effect of transport and temperature on distribution and growth of larvae and pelagic juveniles of Arcto-Norwegian cod. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 1375–1386. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.05.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vikebø, F. B., Broch, O. J., Endo, C. A. K., Frøysa, H. G., Carroll, J., Juselius, J., et al. (2021). Northeast Arctic Cod and prey match-mismatch in a high-latitude spring-bloom system. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:767191. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.767191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vikebø, F. B., Husebø, A. S., Slotte, A., Stenevik, E. K., and Lien, V. S. (2010). Effect of hatching date, vertical distribution, and interannual variation in physical forcing on northward displacement and temperature conditions of Norwegian spring-spawning herring larvae. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 67, 1948–1956. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq084

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vikebø, F. B., Strand, K. O., and Sundby, S. (2019). Wind intensity is key to phytoplankton spring bloom under climate change. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:518. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00518

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yaragina, N. A., Aglen, A., and Sokolov, K. M. (2011). “Cod,” in The Barents Sea: Ecosystem, Resources, Management, eds T. Jakobsen and V. K. Ozhigin (Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press), 225–270.

Google Scholar

Yashayaev, I., and Seidov, D. (2015). The role of the Atlantic Water in multidecadal ocean variability in the Nordic and Barents Seas. Prog. Oceanogr. 132, 68–127. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2014.11.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar