Review on the physical chemistry of iodine transformations in the oceans

1 Introduction

The thermodynamically favorable form of iodine in seawater is iodate (${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$). However, iodide (I^-) is present in oxic, suboxic and anoxic waters. The one electron transfer reaction of I^- with molecular oxygen, ³O₂, to form the iodine atom (I•) and superoxide (O₂^-) is thermodynamically unfavorable as is the reaction of two I^- with ³O₂ to form I₂ and H₂O₂ (Luther et al., 1995; Luther, 2011). Thus, other oxidants are required to initiate abiotic iodide oxidation, and I^- is a known sink for O₃. Biotic iodide oxidation has received much interest with one report showing conversion of iodide to iodate (Hughes et al., 2021). Iodate reduction can occur with common reductants (e.g., sulfide, Fe²⁺), and various organisms that decompose organic matter using iodate as the electron acceptor. Nitrate reductase and dimethyl sulfoxide reductase enzymes from these and planktonic microbes are considered important mediators for biotic iodate reduction (e.g., Hung et al., 2005; Amachi, 2008). Thus, there has been extensive interest in the chemistry of these two iodine species and the possible intermediates that form during their 6-electron redox interconversion ever since the element, iodine, was first discovered as I₂ during the study of brown kelp algae of the Laminariales (kelps/seaweeds) by Courtois in the early 1800s (Wong, 1991; Küpper et al., 2008; Küpper et al., 2011).

Possible chemical species that form during the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}\leftrightarrow {\text{I}}^{-}$ interconversion are given in eqn. (1a, b). The loss of an O atom is equivalent to a two-electron transfer resulting in the reduction of the iodine from +5 in ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to +3 for ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (HOIO) to +1 for HOI (IO^-) and to -1 for I^-. The acid-base species in parentheses are minor species at seawater pH as the pK_a values for HOI and HOIO are 10.7 (K_a = 2 x 10^-11) and 4.49 (K_a = 3.2 x 10^-5), respectively.

$\begin{array}{ll}{\text{IO}}_3^{-}\leftrightarrow {\text{IO}}_2^{-}(\text{HOIO})\leftrightarrow \text{HOI}({\text{IO}}^{-})\leftrightarrow {\text{I}}^{-}& \text{(1a)}\end{array}$

Equation 1b shows the interconversion between HOI and I^- as HOI undergoes one-electron transfer to I₂ followed by another one-electron reduction per I atom to I^-.

$\begin{array}{ll}\text{HOI}({\text{IO}}^{-})\leftrightarrow {\text{I}}_2\leftrightarrow {\text{I}}^{-}& \text{(1b)}\end{array}$

This work considers the thermodynamics of these transformations during the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$, which occurs in anoxic systems, during organic matter decomposition and by phytoplankton, as well as the oxidation of I^-, which occurs by the direct oxidation of iodide by iodide oxidizing bacteria, oxidized metals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are produced by certain microbes, (macro)algae and abiotic processes including photochemistry. In a previous work (Luther, 2011), the chemistry and thermodynamics of chloride, bromide and iodide oxidation were compared; however, I(+3) species (HOIO, iodous acid, and ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$, iodite) and stepwise iodate reduction were not considered. Here, stepwise reactions of the iodine species in equations 1a and 1b with environmentally important reactants (including transient ROS species) are considered for both the oxidation of I^- and the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to affect their interconversion. The kinetics of these stepwise reactions are also considered. Kinetic data for the first step(s) in iodide oxidation are available, but less kinetic information is available for iodate reduction.

2 Methods

2.1 Calculations of aqueous redox potentials from half-reactions

Table 1 gives several equations for redox half-reactions that include the pH dependence for the reaction considered. These are pϵ(pH) relationships based on the balanced chemical equations and the thermodynamics of each chemical species. The basic mathematical approach has been fully developed in standard textbooks (Stumm and Morgan, 1996; Luther, 2016) and used in previous publications (Luther, 2010; Luther, 2011). Aqueous thermodynamic data to calculate the pϵ(pH) or logK(pH) relationships in Table 1 (at 25°C and 1 atm) are from Stumm and Morgan (1996) and other sources (Bard et al., 1985; Stanbury, 1989). The value used for the Gibbs free energy for Fe²⁺ (-90.53 kJ/mole) is that discussed in Rickard and Luther (2007). Values of the free energy for HOIO and ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ are from Schmitz (2008).

TABLE 1

Table 1 Reduction half-reactions for relevant species of oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, manganese, iron and iodine normalized to one electron.

The calculated pϵ value from each half-reaction is given as a function of pH as in the examples in Table 1, and these half reactions can be used for simple calculations of the pE values of full reactions (see next section). When H⁺ or OH^- is not in a balanced equation for a half-reaction, there is no pH dependence on the half-reaction. The pε calculated is termed pϵ(pH) which provides a log K for each half-reaction at a given pH. Concentration dependence for the other reactants are not considered in the calculation; thus, these are considered standard state calculations. When concentration dependence is considered, the calculated pϵ value can vary as in the following example for the O₂/H₂O couple (O1 in Table 1).

Using the balanced half reaction and the Gibbs free energy of formation of each species at 25°C, the Gibbs free energy of the reaction and the equilibrium constant are calculated.

$${\text{O}}_{2(\text{aq})}+ 4 {\text{H}}^{+}+ 4{\text{e}}^{-}\to 2{\text{H}}_2\text{O}16.32 0 0 2(-237.18) \Delta \text{G}{°}_{\text{formation}}(\text{kJ}/\text{mol})$$

The standard state ΔG° for the reaction = - 490.68 kJ/2 moles H₂O or 4 moles of electrons. The equilibrium constant ($K_4^0$) is given in eqn. 2a where {} indicates activity for each chemical species and the activity of H₂O is defined as 1.

$\begin{array}{ll}{K}_4^0=\frac{{\left\{H_{2}O\right\}}^2}{\left\{O_2\right\} {\left\{H^{+}\right\}}^{4 }{\left\{e^{-}\right\}}^{4 }}& \text{(2a)}\end{array}$

On expanding, eqn. 2b results.

$\begin{array}{ll}\log K_4^0=-\log \left\{O_{2(aq)}\right\}-\log {\left\{H^{+}\right\}}^4-\log {\left\{e^{-}\right\}}^4 = \frac{{\text{ΔG}}_{reaction}^0}{2.303 RT}=86.00 & \text{(2b)}\end{array}$

$\log K_4^0$ is for 4 mole of electrons or 21.50 for 1 mole of electrons.

For a one-electron half-reaction, we have

$$\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$4$}\right.{\text{O}}_{2(\text{aq})}+{\text{H}}^{+}+{\text{e}}^{-}\to \raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$2$}\right.{\text{H}}_2\text{O}$$

And equation 2b becomes equation 2c

$\begin{array}{ll}\frac{1}{4}\log K_4^0= -\frac{1}{4}\log \left\{O_{2(aq)}\right\}-\log \left\{H^{+}\right\}-\log \left\{e^{-}\right\}& \text{(2c)}\end{array}$

or

$$\frac{1}{4}\log K_4^0=-\frac{1}{4}\log \left\{O_{2(aq)}\right\}+pH+\text{pε} and on rearranging$$

$$\text{pε} = \frac{1}{4}\log K_4^0+\frac{1}{4}\log \left\{O_{2(aq)}\right\}-pH$$

From the Nernst Equation, ${\text{pε}}^{\text{o}}={\mathrm{1/4}\text{ log K}}_4^0=21.50$ (the standard state value), which on substitution gives equation O1 (see Table 1) where concentration is used for O_2(aq).

$\begin{array}{ll}\text{pε}={\text{pε}}^{\text{o}}+\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$4$}\right.\text{log}[{\text{O}}_{2(\text{aq})}]–\text{pH}=21.50+\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$4$}\right.log\left\{{\text{O}}_{2(\text{aq})}\right\}–\text{pH}& \text{(O1)}\end{array}$

At ocean surface conditions of 211 µM O₂ (211 x 10^-6 M; 100% saturation at 25°C and salinity of 35), this expression becomes

$$\text{pε}=21.50+\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$4$}\right.\text{ log}[211\times {10}^{-6}\text{M}]–\text{pH}=20.58–\text{pH}$$

and at a pH of 8, pε = 12.58.

At 1µM O₂ (10^-6 M) which occurs in oxygen minimum zones, this expression becomes

$$\text{pε}=21.50+\raisebox{1ex}{$1$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{$4$}\right.\text{log}[{10}^{-6}\text{M}]–\text{pH} =20.00–\text{pH}$$

and at a pH of 7.5, pε = 12.50.

At unit activity for all reagents including H⁺, pε = pε°. At unit activity of all reagents other than the H⁺, equation O1a results, which is used for many calculations in this paper.

$\begin{array}{ll}\text{pε}={\text{pε}}^{\text{o}}–\text{pH}=21.50–\text{pH}& \text{(O1a)}\end{array}$

Note that the above equations show a 1.50 log unit change for an O₂ concentration range from 1 µM to unity activity (O1a) so the calculations could vary an order of magnitude or more in either direction when concentration dependence is included. However, comparisons can be more easily made when combining different half-reactions at a given pH. This permits an assessment of which combined half-reactions are thermodynamically favorable and thus more likely to occur in a given environmental setting.

2.2 Coupling half-reactions

As an example of coupling two half reactions to determine whether a reaction is favorable, I use the data in Table 1 for the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5b) by ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ (N1) in equation 3.

$\begin{array}{ll}{\text{NO}}_2^{-}+{\text{IO}}_3^{-}\to {\text{NO}}_3^{-}+{\text{IO}}_2^{-}& (3)\end{array}$

Equation 4 is used to calculate a complete reaction’s pε or ΔlogK_reaction value. All values of ΔlogK_reaction > 0 indicate a favorable reaction and all values of ΔlogK_reaction< 0 indicate an unfavorable reaction.

$\begin{array}{ll}{\text{pε}}_{\text{reaction}}={\text{pε}}_{\text{red}}+{\text{pε}}_{\text{oxid}}=\Delta {\text{logK}}_{\text{reaction}}& (4)\end{array}$

At a pH of 7, the pε_red values for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ are 7.91 and 7.28, respectively. As ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ is the reductant, it is oxidized; thus, the sign for pε_red (7.28) is reversed to become pε_oxid (-7.28).

$$\Delta {\text{logK}}_{\text{reaction}}={\text{pε}}_{\text{red}}({\text{IO}}_3^{-})+{\text{pε}}_{\text{oxid}}({\text{NO}}_3^{-})=7.91+(-7.28)=0.63$$

For reaction 3, there is no pH dependence as the pH dependence of each half-reaction is similar so cancels.

For this work, Table 1 lists the pϵ(pH) values for Mn, Fe, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur and iodine species for the relevant iodine redox reactions considered. Dissolved Fe(II) and Mn(II) are primarily hexaaquo species until the pH is > 7, where hydroxo complexes start to become important. As most reactions occur via one and two-electron transfers, the calculations will permit assessment of a thermodynamically unfavorable step along a reaction coordinate of six-electrons as in the reduction of iodate to iodide and the oxidation of iodide to iodate. From surface waters to decomposition zones, seawater pH values range from 8 down to 7; thus, the following discussion will emphasize this pH range.

3 Results and discussion: Iodate reduction

3.1 Iodate and iodide speciation at different seawater oxygen conditions

In the oxic environment, the oxidizing condition of the environment or pε is set by the 4-electron transfer reaction of the O_2(aq)/H₂O couple [reaction O1 in Table 1]. At a pH of 8, temperature 25⁰C and a salinity of 35, 100% O_2(aq) saturation is 211 μM, which gives a pε of 12.58 (Figure 1). As the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}/{\text{I}}^{-}$ couple has a pε of 10.56 at $\text{pH}=8,{\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ is the thermodynamically favored iodine species.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1 ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and I^- concentrations for a total iodine concentration of 450 nM at different environmental pε values assuming that O_2(aq) reduction to H₂O sets the pε value of ocean waters.

Entering the pε value for a given [O_2(aq)] into equation Io6 allows the determination of the iodide to iodate ratio and the actual concentration of each assuming a total iodine concentration of 450-470 nM (Elderfield and Truesdale, 1980). Figure 1 shows the iodate and iodide concentrations are equivalent at a pε of 10.56. The vertical lines indicate the environmental pε for [O_2(aq)] of 1, 10, 100 nM, and 1, 50 and 211 μM. As oxygen minimum zones (OMZ) of the Arabian Sea and the equatorial Pacific Ocean have [O_2(aq)] concentrations in the 1-100 nM range (Revsbech et al., 2009; Lehner et al., 2015), calculations show that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ is the thermodynamically preferred iodine species even at 1 nM O_2(aq), which gives a pε of 11.25 for the O_2(aq)/H₂O couple. However, I^- is the dominant iodine species detected in OMZ waters (Wong and Brewer, 1977; Luther and Campbell, 1991; Rue et al., 1997; Farrenkopf and Luther, 2002; Cutter et al., 2018). At [O_2(aq)] concentrations ≤ 1 μM, ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$, ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ and Mn²⁺ concentrations are now similar or higher in concentration and should determine the pε of the water.

As most reactions occur by 1- or 2-electron transfers, Figure 2 shows the redox sequence for two electron transfer redox couples ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}/{\text{NO}}_2^{-}(\text{N}1)$, MnO₂/Mn²⁺ (Mn1) and the one-electron redox couple Fe(OH)₃/Fe²⁺ (Fe3) over a wide range of pH. The redox sequence at pH = 8 is as expected for the N, Mn and Fe systems. As ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ (up to 12 μM) and Mn²⁺ (up to 8 μM) are formed at OMZ oxic-anoxic transition zones (e.g., Arabian Sea, Black Sea, Equatiorial Pacific, see Lewis and Luther, 2000; Trouwborst et al., 2006; Cutter et al., 2018, respectively) and are in higher concentration than O_2(aq), the ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}\to {\text{NO}}_2^{-}(\text{N}1)$ and MnO₂ → Mn²⁺ (Mn1) couples can be chosen to set the environmental pε. At pH = 8, the ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ pε is 6.15 and the MnO₂ to Mn²⁺ pε is 4.80. At pH = 7, the ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ pε is 7.28 and the MnO₂ to Mn²⁺ pε is 6.80. At these pε values, O_2(aq) is below 1 nM, and I^- is now the thermodynamically favored iodine species when comparing these data with the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}/{\text{I}}^{-}$ couple (pε of 10.56 at pH = 8).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2 Two electron transfer redox couples for O₃ (O4), N (N1), Mn (Mn1) and I (Io2a, Io4b, Io5b), and one electron transfer redox couple for Fe (Fe3). The oxidized species is always above the line and the reduced below the line as in the O₂/H₂O and the H₂O/H₂ couples, which dictate the water stability field.

Figure 2 also shows that the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}/{\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ couple (Io5b) should be the first step in the reaction sequence of iodate to iodide (eqn. 1a). As the pε of the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}/{\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ couple has a more positive pε value than the N, Mn and Fe couples in Figure 2, ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction is more favorable than these couples even though it is very close to the ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}/{\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ couple. Thus, ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ is predicted to reduce before ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$, and biological activity (e.g., nitrate reductase activity) is not necessary to reduce ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (see section 3.2). Because of the strong pH dependence for the Mn and Fe couples, they cross the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}/{\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}/{\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ couples at lower pH, which have similar slopes. Thus, ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ is predicted to reduce ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (eqn. 3). Interestingly, Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ should be poorer reductants than ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ for conversion of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ at a pH< 6 and pH< 1, respectively, but are more favorable to reduce ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ than ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ above those pH values (see sections 3.2 and 3.3).

Although the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- conversion occurs at higher pε, it is a 6-electron transfer (IO6), which is not a facile process. Thus, the intermediates (${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and HOI) will dictate the reactivity sequence via a combination of thermodynamic and kinetic considerations.

As shown in Figure 2, ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ reduction to HOI and HOI reduction to I^- are also more favorable at higher pε values than the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- couple. At a pH = 8, the ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to HOI couple has a pε value of 12.06 corresponding to 2 μM O₂ (see Figure 1). Similarly, the HOI to I^- couple has a pε value of 12.66 corresponding to 250 μM O₂. At a pH of 7, both couples have pε values greater than 13 indicating that, even at O₂ saturation, I^- is the dominant species predicted when these intermediates form. At a pH = 7.5 (that is found in many OMZ waters), both ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to HOI and HOI to I^- couples have pε values greater than 12.6; also indicating that at O₂ saturation, I^- is the dominant species predicted. Thus, the intermediates ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and HOI are not predicted to be stable in marine waters; thus, the conversion of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ is a key step. Interestingly, Hardisty et al. (2021) found in situ ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction in the oxycline where [O_2(aq)] was 11 μM, but not at [O_2(aq)]< 2 μM. Lastly, the O₃ to O₂ + H₂O couple is highly oxidizing indicating that all iodine couples should lead to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ formation. O₃ reactions will be discussed in more detail below (sections 4.2, 4.7).

In the next sections (3.2 – 3.5), the thermodynamics for the conversion of iodate to iodide via the intermediates outlined in equations 1a and 1b by environmental reductants are considered to show what step, if any, in the reduction of iodate to iodide may be unfavorable over a wide range of pH. Iodate reduction is well known in the marine environment (e.g., Wong and Brewer, 1977; Wong et al., 1985; Luther and Campbell, 1991; Rue et al., 1997; Farrenkopf and Luther, 2002; Cutter et al., 2018) and occurs via chemical reductants like sulfide (Zhang and Whitfield, 1986) and via microbes like Shewanella putrfaciens (Farrenkopf et al., 1997) and Shewanella oneidensis (Mok et al., 2018) during dissimilatory reduction coupled with decomposition (oxidation) of organic matter as well as phytoplankton mediated processes (e.g., Chance et al., 2007).

3.2 Iodate reduction by NO₂^-

Although ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ has not yet been shown to be a reductant for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ in aqueous lab studies (eqn. 3), HNO₂ is a reductant for MnO₂ (Luther and Popp, 2002) and Mn(III)-pyrophosphate (Luther et al., 2021). Figure 3A shows the thermodynamic calculations for the stepwise conversion of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- by ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ reduction (${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ oxidizes to ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$). All 2-electron transfer reactions, which involve O atom loss for iodine, are favorable over the pH range. For seawater pH (7-8), the least favorable reaction is the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ reaction whereas the ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to HOI and HOI to I^- reactions are more favorable. Thus, the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ conversion appears to be the controlling step in the reaction sequence. The 1-electron transfer reaction of HOI to I₂ is the most favorable, but the second 1-electron transfer reaction of I₂ to I^- is only favorable at pH > 4. Thus, reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- by ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ is predicted via 1-electron or 2-electron transfer reactions at seawater pH values. The data plotted in Figure 2 indicate that once ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ forms there is no thermodynamic barrier to I^- formation.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3 Thermodynamics for (A) the 1-electron and 2-electron reductions of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5a, Io5b, Io6), ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (Io4b), HOI (Io2, Io3), and I₂ (Io1) by ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ (N1) and (B) 2-electron reductions of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5b), ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (Io4a, Io4b), HOI (Io2) by DMS (S3). The vertical line represents the pK_a value of 4.49 for HO₂I. Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

The ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reaction with ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ has been reported to produce I₂ in ice by Kim et al. (2019), but not in solution. The pH in the ice was 3 where HNO₂ and H₂ONO⁺ exist and are the likely reductants. Thus, polar areas may be locales for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction. At seawater pH, the reaction seems to be hindered by kinetics in the transition state as each reactant (${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$) is an anion, which will repel each other.

3.3 Biological iodate reduction

The marine literature has many reports on the uptake of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (with or without ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$) by phytoplankton with the iodine released as I^- (e.g., Elderfield and Truesdale, 1980; Wong, 2001; Wong et al., 2002; Chance et al., 2007; Bluhm et al., 2010). As a result of this iodate uptake, ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ reductase was presumed by some researchers to be a key process for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction to I^-. Also, Bluhm et al. (2010) and Carrano et al. (2020) showed that algal senescence enhanced I^- release, and Hepach et al. (2020) showed that there is a considerable lag between ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ uptake and I^- release due to senescence.

${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ reductase appears to reduce ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ in some phytoplankton (Hung et al., 2005). However, de la Cuesta and Manley (2009) showed that I^- can be up taken by phytoplankton, and that different phytoplankton uptake I^- whereas other phytoplankton uptake ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$. Thus, there is no need for nitrate reductase for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction as I^- can be up taken by some phytoplankton rather than form from ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction. Moreover, Waite and Truesdale (2003) showed that nitrate reductase was not important for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction by Isochrysis galbana. The latter study is consistent with the thermodynamics of the reduction ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ being more favorable than the reduction ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$.

Furthermore, under anaerobic conditions, dissimilatory ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction occurs without nitrate reductase for the denitrifying bacterium, Pseudomonas stutzeri, (Amachi et al., 2007; Amachi, 2008). Reyes-Umana et al. (2022) and Yamazaki et al. (2020) showed that iodate reductase is in the periplasmic space of Pseudomonas sp SCT. Also, Mok et al. (2018) showed that dissimilatory ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction by Shewanella oneidensis does not involve nitrate reductase. Recently, Shin et al. (2022) showed that Shewanella oneidensis requires extracellular dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) reductase involving a molybdenum enzyme center for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction. Guo et al. (2022) studied bacterial genomes in a variety of environments and documented that Shewanella oneidensis are ubiquitous in all fresh and marine waters; they concluded that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction is a major biogeochemical process. Thus, nitrate reductase (also an O atom transfer reaction) is not a requirement for bacterial ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction to I^-.

The interconversion of dimethylsulfoxide with dimethylsulfide during dissimilatory ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction is another 2-electron O-atom transfer reaction. Moreover, the reactions of DMS to reduce HOI, ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ are thermodynamically favorable (Figure 3B, DMSO reduction is in S3, Table 1 and occurs at a lower pε than ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ and ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction). The reaction of DMS with HOI has been suggested by Müller et al. (2021) to be a sink for DMS based on the rapid reaction of DMS with HOBr.

3.4 Iodate reduction by Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺

Figure 4 shows the thermodynamics for the stepwise conversion of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- by reduction with Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺. Concentrations of Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ range from several nM to μM in OMZs (e.g., Trouwborst et al., 2006; Moffett and German, 2020) and in suboxic porewaters (e.g., Oldham et al., 2019; Owings et al., 2021) to mM in waters emanating from hydrothermal vents (e.g., Estes et al., 2022); in these cases, Mn²⁺ and Fe²⁺ are normally higher in concentration than the total iodine concentration. For the 2-electron transfer reactions with Mn²⁺, only the ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to HOI reaction is favorable over the entire pH range. The ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ reaction is favorable only at pH > 6 whereas the other reactions are favorable at pH > 3. Thus, the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ conversion is the controlling step in the reaction sequence when Mn²⁺ is the reductant. Using high resolution porewater profiles of I^- and Mn²⁺ obtained by voltammetric microelectrodes, Anschutz et al. (2000) showed that a I^- maximum occurred at the depth where upward diffusing Mn(II) was being removed and proposed that I^- formed by the reaction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ with Mn²⁺ under suboxic conditions. The reaction has not been investigated in laboratory studies.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4 Thermodynamics for the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5a, Io5b, Io6), ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (Io4b), HOI (Io2, Io3), and I₂ (Io1) by Mn²⁺ (Mn1) and Fe²⁺ (Fe3). The vertical line represents the pK_a value of 4.49 for HO₂I. Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

For the reaction sequence with Fe²⁺, all iodine species reductions are favorable over the entire pH range except for the I₂ to I^- reaction, which is favorable at pH > 2.5. Thus, there is no thermodynamic inhibition to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction to I^- by Fe²⁺, and this abiotic reaction at a pH of 7 was reported to be 92% complete after 2 hours using initial concentrations of 2 mM Fe²⁺ and 0.1 mM ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Councell et al., 1997). Because the Fe(OH)₃ to Fe²⁺ couple is a 1-electron transfer, two Fe²⁺ are required in each step of the sequence. Again, the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ conversion is the least favorable and likely controlling step in this reaction sequence.

Comparing Figures 3, 4 indicates that the Mn²⁺ and ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ reactions with iodine species have a similar range of ΔlogK_reaction values whereas the Fe²⁺ reactions with iodine species are more favorable (higher ΔlogK_reaction values).

3.5 Iodate reduction by sulfide

In sulfidic waters and porewaters, ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ does not exist as sulfide reacts readily with it (Zhang and Whitfield, 1986), and S(0) forms as the initial sulfur product. Figure 5 shows the thermodynamics for the stepwise conversion of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and to HOI by sulfide where S(0) forms as an intermediate leading to S₈. As the Gibbs free energy of formation for HSOH is unknown, HSOH could not be evaluated as an intermediate, which on continued oxidation would form ${\text{SO}}_4^{2-}$. The reaction of sulfide with I₂ and HOI is well known as the iodometric titration, so calculations were not performed. The only unfavorable iodine reduction reactions are the 1-electron reductions that lead to the formation of the HS radical (HS• or HS rad). The conversion of ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to HOI is more favorable as it has the larger ΔlogK_reaction values. Again, the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ conversion is the least favorable and likely controlling step in this reaction sequence.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5 Thermodynamics for the 2-electron transfer reductions of (A) ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5b) and (B) ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (Io4b) by sulfide species (S1, S2, S4, S5). The vertical line represents the pK_a1 value for H₂S. Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

3.6 Iodate reduction by NH₄⁺

Figure 6 shows the thermodynamics for the stepwise conversion of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ by ${\text{NH}}_4^{+}$ where hydrazine (N₂H₄) and hydroxylamine (NH₂OH) as well as their protonated forms could form as the first N intermediates. The thermodynamic calculations for these 2 electron transfers indicate that these reactions are not favorable. However, the reaction of the intermediates, if they could form by other processes, with ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to form N₂ is very favorable. Thus, the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ conversion is the controlling step in the reaction sequence with ${\text{NH}}_4^{+}$.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6 Thermodynamics for the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (IO5b) by ${\text{NH}}_4^{+}$ to hydrazine species (N3a, N3b), hydroxylamine species (N4a, N4b) and by ${\text{N}}_2{\text{H}}_5^{+}$ (N5) and NH₂OH (N6). The vertical lines represent the pK_a values for NH₃OH⁺ (5.82) and ${\text{N}}_2{\text{H}}_5^{+}$ (7.93), respectively. Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

4 Results and discussion: Iodide oxidation

4.1 Iodide oxidation by NO₃^-, MnO₂ and Fe(OH)₃

Figures 3–6 showed the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ with reductants. All values of ΔlogK_reaction > 0 indicate a favorable reaction and all values of ΔlogK_reaction< 0 indicate an unfavorable reaction. These figures can be used to discuss the reverse reaction of I^- oxidation with oxidants. For reverse reactions, when a ΔlogK_reaction< 0, then I^- oxidation is favorable, but when ΔlogK_reaction > 0, I^- oxidation is unfavorable.

In Figure 3, ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ is not an oxidant for I^- (reverse of the ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ and I₂ reaction) except for the formation of I₂ at a pH< 4.

In Figure 4, MnO₂ oxidizes I^- to HOI (reverse of the Mn²⁺ and HOI reaction) at a pH< 3 and I^- to I₂ (reverse of the Mn²⁺ and I₂ reaction) at a pH< 5. A couple of laboratory studies showed I^- oxidation with synthetic birnessite (δ-MnO₂). First, Fox et al. (2009) showed that I₂ was produced over the pH range 4.50 – 6.25, and that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ formed in smaller amounts. The kinetics of the reaction were slower at higher pH by 1.5 log units (> 30-fold) and were slower when smaller amounts of MnO₂ were added (Table 2). Allard et al. (2009) investigated the same reactants to a pH of 7.5 and found I₂ and ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ as products; above pH = 7 the reaction is very slow. Iodate was found mainly in lower pH waters. Both I₂ and ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ adsorb to the birnessite surface. Similar results have been found over the pH range 4-6 for Mn(III) solids (Szlamkowicz et al., 2022). These MnO_x reactions with I^- are much slower that the reactions with reactive oxygen species (Table 2). Nevertheless, these are important as Kennedy and Elderfield (1987a, 1987b) showed that the conversion of iodide to iodate occurred in marine sediments.

TABLE 2

Table 2 Kinetic rate constants for the reaction of oxidants with Iodide and I₂.

Figure 4 also shows that I^- oxidation by Fe(OH)₃ to I₂ (reverse of the Fe²⁺ and I₂ reaction) should occur only at a pH< 2.5. The I^- to HOI conversion (reverse of the Fe²⁺ and HOI reaction) is favorable at pH ≤ 0.5.

4.2 Iodide oxidation by oxygen species

Figure 7 shows the thermodynamics of I^- oxidation to I₂ by oxygen species. Figure 7A shows that the one-electron process for I^- oxidation with ³O₂ is thermodynamically unfavorable over all pH whereas Figure 7B shows that the two-electron process is favorable at a pH< 3. Figure 7A shows that the successive 1-electron oxidations of I^- where superoxide (${\text{O}}_2^{-}$) is reduced to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), which is reduced to hydroxyl radical (•OH). Only •OH is thermodynamically favorable over the pH range considered. ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ and H₂O₂ show favorable reactions at pH< 9 and pH< 6, respectively.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7 Thermodynamics for I₂ formation via the oxidation of I^- (Io1) with (A) the successive 1-electron oxidants ³O₂ (O6), ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ (O7), H₂O₂ (O8) and •OH (O9b); (B) the 2-electron oxidants ³O₂ (O2), ¹O₂ (O5), H₂O₂ (O3), and O₃ (O4). Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

By contrast, Figure 7B shows that the reactions of I^- with the 2-electron oxidants H₂O₂, ¹O₂ and O₃ are all thermodynamically favorable. The likely reaction pathway is the loss of 2-electrons to produce I⁺, which then reacts with I^- to form I₂. Note that H₂O₂ reacts to form H₂O not •OH in Figure 7B. The 2-electron reaction with O₃ (Figure 7B) is more favorable than the 1-electron reaction (Figure 7A).

Wong and Zhang (2008) showed that H₂O₂ oxidizes I^- in artificial seawater from pH 7-9, which is consistent with Figure 7B. However, I^- oxidation does not lead to iodate. In fact, I^- reforms. They proposed that I₂ formed and was reduced back to I^-, but they did not provide a mechanism. The reverse reaction of I₂ with •OH (ΔlogK_reaction< 0 in the plot) is favorable to reform H₂O₂ and I^- at pH > 6 whereas the reverse reaction of H₂O₂ with I₂ to reform ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ and I^- is favorable at a pH > 9 (ΔlogK_reaction< 0 in the plot). These thermodynamic data indicate that H₂O₂ can form I₂ in a 2-electron transfer (Figure 7B) and then reduce I₂ to I^- in a 1-electron transfer (Figure 7A).

At seawater pH, superoxide, ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$, can oxidize I^- to I₂ and the reaction occurs with a rate constant of 10⁸ M^-1s^-1 (Bielski et al., 1985; Table 2). Because I₂ is a good electron acceptor, the subsequent reaction of ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ with I₂ leads to ${\text{I}}_2^{-}$ (Schwarz and Bielski, 1986). As to be discussed in section 4.3, I₂ reacts with organic matter to form organo-iodine compounds. Extracellular ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ is generated by Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b (Li et al., 2014) and results in the oxidation of Mn²⁺ to Mn(III,IV) oxides. However, Li et al. (2014) found that ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ also oxidized I^-. Considering that extracellular ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ formation is a widespread phenomenon among marine and terrestrial bacteria, this could represent an important first step in the pathway for iodide oxidation in some environments. The Mn oxides formed by Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3b are not the oxidant as MnO₂ kinetics is slower (Table 2).

To obtain ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$, further oxidation of I₂ to HOI must occur, and •OH is one candidate with a rate constant of 1.2 x 10¹⁰ (Buxton et al., 1988; Table 2). Also, O₃ has a rate constant of 1.2 x 10⁹ (Liu et al., 2001).

I₂ is a prominent intermediate in I^- oxidation yet HOI is needed to form ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$. HOI can form directly from I^- and I₂ oxidation or from hydrolysis of I₂ (reverse of eqn. 5), which is fast at basic pH (Wong, 1991). Figure 8A shows that of the successive 1-electron oxidants (starting from O₂) for I₂ oxidation, only •OH is thermodynamically favorable over all pH to form HOI whereas O₃ is favorable at pH > 6, and ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ is favorable at pH< 6. H₂O₂ as a 1-electron oxidant cannot oxidize I₂ to form HOI, but H₂O₂ can reduce HOI to I₂ (reverse of the ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ and I₂ reaction). Figure 8B indicates that, as 2-electron oxidants, H₂O₂ and O₃ oxidation can lead to HOI formation. Comparing Δlog K values in Figures 7, 8 indicates that oxidation of I₂ to HOI is less favorable than the oxidation of I^- to I₂.

FIGURE 8

Figure 8 Thermodynamics for the formation of HOI via the oxidation of I₂ (Io3) with (A) the successive 1-electron oxidants ³O₂ (O6), ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ (O7), H₂O₂ (O8), •OH (O9b) and O₃ (O11); (B) the 2-electron oxidants ³O₂ (O2), ¹O₂ (O5), H₂O₂ (O3), and O₃ (O4). Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

These data also indicate why the comproportionation reaction of HOI with I^- to form I₂ can occur (eqn. 5, Carpenter et al., 2013).

$\begin{array}{ll}{\text{H}}^{+}+\text{HOI}+{\text{I}}^{-}\leftrightarrow {\text{I}}_2+{\text{H}}_2\text{O}& (5)\end{array}$

Although disproportionation of HOI to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and I^- (eqn. 6) is fast in strongly basic solution, it is not detectable at seawater pH (Wong, 1991).

$\begin{array}{ll}3\text{HOI}+3{\text{OH}}^{-}\leftrightarrow {\text{IO}}_3^{-}+2{\text{I}}^{-}+3{\text{H}}_2\text{O}& (6)\end{array}$

Figure 9 shows the successive 2-electron oxidation reactions of I^-, HOI and ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ with ³O₂, ¹O₂, H₂O₂ and O₃. ³O₂ cannot affect the oxidation at any pH. Figure 9 shows that O₃ oxidation reactions with I^-, HOI and ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ are favorable; thus, O₃ can affect the complete oxidation of I^- to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$. Also, the H₂O₂ oxidation reactions of I^-, HOI and ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ are favorable and can lead to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ formation; however, the kinetics of H₂O₂ oxidation can be slow. Haloperoxidase enzymes from organisms enhance the kinetics (Butler and Sandy, 2009) as does the reaction of H₂O₂ with carboxylic acids secreted by microbes to form peroxy carboxylic acids, which in turn oxidize I^- to I₂ (Li et al., 2012). The reactive oxygen species ¹O₂ can oxidize I^- at pH< 10, oxidize HOI at pH > 5, and ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ over all pH. Thus, ¹O₂ can be an oxidant of I^- to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ at seawater pH. These data indicate that HOI oxidation leads to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ formation.

FIGURE 9

Figure 9 Thermodynamics for the reaction of ³O₂ (O2), ¹O₂ (O5), H₂O₂ (O3), and O₃ (O4) as 2-electron oxidants with (A) I^- to form HOI (Io2), (B) HOI to form ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (Io4b) and (C) ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to form ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5b). The vertical lines represent the pK_a value of 4.49 for HO₂I dissociation to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$. Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

Interestingly, ΔlogK values in Figure 9A show that the thermodynamics of I^- oxidation by the 2-electron oxidants O₃ and H₂O₂ to form HOI is slightly less favorable than I₂ formation (Figure 7B). Conversely, thermodynamics of I^- oxidation by H₂O₂ as a 2-electron oxidant to form HOI (Figure 9A) is more favorable than I₂ formation (Figure 7A).

As shown in Figure 10, a potentially potent oxidant for I^- is N₂O, which is an O atom transfer oxidant like O₃. However, the N₂O concentration in seawater is minor, but the largest reported values are 90 and 250 nmol kg^-1 for the OMZs of the Arabian Sea (Freing et al., 2012) and the Eastern Tropical North Pacific (Damgaard et al., 2020), respectively. These values are smaller than the total iodine concentration in seawater. The N₂O concentration in the atmosphere is 335 ppbv (August 2022, https://www.n2olevels.org), which is equivalent to 0.0331 Pa or 7.8 nM dissolved in surface seawater (salinity of 35) at 20 ⁰C using the solubility data from Weiss and Price (1980).

FIGURE 10

Figure 10 Thermodynamics for the 1- and 2- electron reductions of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (Io5a, Io5b, Io6), ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ (Io4b), HOI (Io2, Io3), and I₂ (Io1) by N₂O (N2). Data above the horizontal line at ΔlogK (ΔlogK_reaction) = 0 indicate a favorable reaction and data below the horizontal line indicate an unfavorable reaction.

4.3 ROS in seawater

Reactive oxygen species exist in marine waters, but at low concentrations. O₃ penetrates a few micrometers through the water-air interface at surface iodide concentrations (Carpenter et al., 2013). Powers and Miller (2014) showed that solar-induced processes with organic matter in freshwater and seawater are a major source of ROS (as ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$, H₂O₂, and •OH) with the inventory and production rates for H₂O₂ in surface seawater being highest of the ROS. Also, Sutherland et al. (2020) report that dark, extracellular ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ production is prolific among marine heterotrophic bacteria, cyanobacteria, and eukaryotes. In surface ocean waters, the concentration of H₂O₂ ranges from 20 - 80 nM (Yuan and Shiller, 2001), biological ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$ production gives a total concentration of ~ 0.07 to 0.30 nM (Sutherland et al., 2020), •OH concentration is ~10^-18 M (Mopper and Zhou, 1990), and ¹O₂ concentration ranges from 10^-13 to 10^-14 M (Sunday et al., 2020). However, these ROS concentrations are typically smaller than I^- concentrations, which range from 10 to 200 nM (Chance et al., 2019). Thus, I^- oxidation in seawater samples should be difficult to observe experimentally. Hardisty et al. (2020) tracked the addition of stable isotopes of iodide in sample incubations and report the rate of I^- oxidation to be 118–189 nM yr^-1, which is similar to rates reported by mass balance approaches (Campos et al., 1996a; Truesdale et al., 2001; Žic and Branica, 2006; Žic et al., 2008). Hardisty et al. (2020) report that the product is likely HOI that results in the formation of organic-iodine compounds (see section 4.6) which on decomposition can release I^-.

As the surface concentrations of ROS are smaller than the I^- concentration, the question is how does I^- get oxidized to $I{O}_3^{-}$ in seawater? Microbial processes and the oxidation of I species in the atmosphere by ROS are likely candidates. These are now discussed.

4.4 Iodide oxidation in brown kelp

Brown kelp are the strongest accumulators of iodine as I^- among living organisms (up to 100 mM, Küpper et al., 2008). The element iodine was discovered by the formation of I₂ during exposure of brown kelp to concentrated sulfuric acid, which oxidized I^- to I₂. Kelp releases I^- on the thallus surface and in the apoplast when undergoing oxidative stress during the partial emersion of the brown kelp forest at low tide; e.g., by exposure to high irradiance, desiccation, and atmospheric O₃. Kelp contain vanadium haloperoxidases (Colin et al., 2003; Küpper et al., 2008) that enhance I^- oxidation by H₂O₂. Whereas the nonenzymatic reaction of I^- with H₂O₂ is slow, the reactions with O₃, ${\text{O}}_2^{-}$, ¹O₂, and •OH are very fast (> 10⁸ M^-1s^-1, Table 2); they are also faster than MnO₂ oxidation of I^-. Küpper et al. (2008) consider I^- as the simplest antioxidant known.

4.5 Iodide oxidation by microbes

Hughes et al. (2021) report that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ production occurs in cultures of the ammonia-oxidizing bacteria Nitrosomonas sp. and Nitrosococcus oceani supplied with I^-, but not in cultures of three different nitrite oxidizing bacteria. Information on the enzymes mediating the oxidation were not studied. Nevertheless, ${\text{NH}}_4^{+}$ oxidation via nitrification occurs via NH₂OH formation which is a 2-electron reaction. Further reaction of NH₂OH via metalloenzymes (e.g., Mo and W oxidases that transfer O atoms) leads to ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ (a 4-electron transfer) and ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$. I^- likely goes through the intermediates ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and HOI to form ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$, but these intermediates are reactive and not detectable by present analytical methods unlike ${\text{NO}}_2^{-}$.

Consistent with the Hughes et al. (2021) report, Kennedy and Elderfield (1987a, 1987b) showed that the conversion of iodide to iodate occurred in marine sediments. Microbial intervention is likely, but reaction of I^- with oxidized Mn is possible depending on the pH.

Amachi and Iino (2022) reviewed the genus Iodidimonas, which was originally found in brines, but was also cultured from seawater enriched with I^-. I₂ is the first oxidation product. Iodidimonas contains the iodide oxidizing enzyme (IOX), which is an extracellular protein that contains multicopper oxidases. Iodidimonas requires O₂, not H₂O₂, as the electron acceptor. Other oxidants are required to oxidize I₂ to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ with O₃ and •OH being the most effective.

4.6 HOI and I₂ formation leads to organic iodine

Competing with the inorganic interconversion between iodide and iodate is the formation of organic iodine compounds. Formation of C-I bonds can occur during the reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and oxidation of I^-. Complete reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- does not need to occur intercellularly and can lead to HOI and I₂ formation as in Figure 4. The first step in I^- oxidation also leads to I₂ and HOI. I₂ is neutral and adds to organic compounds such as olefins, which are not very reactive in seawater, whereas I⁺ in HOI reacts with α-keto compounds and peptides through keto-enol isomerization (Truesdale and Luther, 1995). Both I₂ and HOI lead to volatile and nonvolatile organic-iodine (R-I) compounds with C-I or N-I bonds, and Harvey (1980) showed that N-iodo amides were the main organic iodine components in marine sediments. On decay of organic compounds, the C(N)-I bond breaks leading to I^- release, which mimics the senescence pathway outlined by Bluhm et al. (2010) and Hepach et al. (2020). Recently, Ooki et al. (2022) showed that CH₃I and CH₃CH₂I formed in sediments from polar and subpolar seas and was related to increased phytodetritus at the seafloor after the spring bloom.

Allard and Gallard (2013) showed that the oxidation of I^- by birnessite in the presence of organic matter also led to CH₃I over the pH range 4-5.

As total iodine in surface ocean waters is lower by a few percent compared to deep waters (Wong, 1991), the decomposition of organic-iodine leads to some I^- release, which may be oxidized to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (Hughes et al., 2021). This is similar to release and oxidation of ${\text{NH}}_4^{+}$ to ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ from particulate organic matter in deep waters that results in an increase of ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ concentration with depth (recycled element profile). Deep waters contain mainly ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$, so not much I^- is released to the deep-water column by in situ water column processes, and most organic-iodine gets to the sediments where it is released as I^- (Kennedy and Elderfield, 1987a, Kennedy and Elderfields 1987b; Luther et al., 1995). Kennedy and Elderfield (1987a, 1987b) and Shimmield and Pedersen (1990) report that the molar I/C ratio in planktonic organisms is 10^-4 whereas it is typically >10^-3 in sediments. Decomposition of sedimentary organic-I releases I^- to porewaters and the overlying water column where it can be transported hundreds of kilometers offshore along isopycnal surfaces in OMZs (Farrenkopf and Luther, 2002; Cutter et al., 2018).

4.7 Surface seawater and atmospheric formation of IO₃^-, and iodine speciation in the atmosphere

There is significant literature showing that coastal and oceanic regions are sources of iodine emissions to the atmosphere, and I note some important aspects of this air-sea connection. I^- reacts with O₃ to form IO^-, which at seawater pH forms HOI. Carpenter et al. (2013) showed that this reaction occurs in the first few micrometers below the air-water interface and that HOI is ten-fold greater than I₂ above the sea surface. HOI contributes 75% of the observed iodine oxide aerosol levels over the tropical Atlantic Ocean, and these iodine emissions to the atmosphere have increased 3-fold over the last century due to the increase in anthropogenic O₃ (Carpenter et al., 2021). O₃ reacts stepwise with this gaseous HOI (IO^-) and gaseous ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ to form ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$, which can attach to aerosols.

Formation and release of gaseous I₂ from seawater to air permits photochemical breaking of the I-I bond to form gaseous I atoms, •I, which are reactive radicals. Similarly, release of volatile organic-iodine compounds leads to the homolytic cleavage of the C-I bond to form I•. O₃ reacts readily with I• to form gaseous IO• in the marine boundary layer (Whalley et al., 2010). Further stepwise oxidation of gaseous IO•/HOI leads to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$. In laboratory experiments using mass spectrometry detection, Teiwes et al. (2019) showed that hydrated iodide, I(H₂O)^-, reacts with gaseous O₃ to form ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ directly without formation of gaseous HOI or IO^-; thus, ${\text{HIO}}_3/{\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ can form in a two-step reaction sequence in the atmosphere.

Using mass spectrometry to evaluate atmospheric I_xO_y cluster and (nano)particle formation above seabed macroalgae, Sipilä et al. (2016) showed the stepwise formation of HIO₃ via HOI and IO•, which leads to (I₂O₅)_x clusters (x=2-5) containing HIO₃ that result in iodine rich aerosol particles. These data on the formation of I₂O₅ aerosols agree with the exothermic ΔH_reaction values of iodine oxide species reacting with O₃ and each other calculated using quantum mechanics (Kaltsoyannis and Plane, 2008). Sipilä et al. (2016) also showed that cluster formation increased as a burst at low tide indicating significant I₂ release from the macroalgae (and subsequent oxidation) as found by Küpper et al. (2008). Hydration of I₂O₅ leads to two ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$. In mass spectrometry laboratory studies, Martín et al. (2022) showed that new iodine containing (nano)particles and ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ also form in the presence of ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}$ and provide ΔH_reaction data for the gas phase reactions involved. Experiments using the CERN CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets) chamber documented the formation of HIO₃ via iodooxy hypoiodite, IOIO, as an intermediate (Finkenzeller et al., 2022) and the fast growth of HIO₃ as (nano)particles (He et al., 2021).

In recent atmospheric campaigns, Koenig et al. (2020) showed that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ is the main iodine reservoir as it forms on aerosols in the stratosphere with iodine being responsible for 32% of the halogen induced O₃ loss. Cuevas et al. (2022) also showed that iodine can dominate (∼73%) the halogen-mediated lower stratospheric ozone loss during summer and early fall, when the heterogeneous reactivation of inorganic chlorine and bromine reservoirs is reduced.

The information in the preceding paragraphs along with the thermodynamic data from Martín et al. (2022), Figure 2 (the half reaction for O₃ to O₂ and H₂O) and Figure 9 predict that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ should be the dominant species in the atmosphere. Although reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ is not predicted in an oxidizing atmosphere, analyses of rainwater (Campos et al., 1996b; Truesdale and Jones, 1996; Baker et al., 2001; Hou et al., 2009), aerosols (Gilfedder et al., 2008; Droste et al., 2021) and snow (Gilfedder et al., 2008) in the marine boundary layer indicate that aqueous iodide and iodate coexist. Hou et al. (2009) reviewed wet iodine speciation data and reported that ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ predominates over I^- from marine sources/air masses whereas I^- predominates from continental air masses.

There are several ways that I^- (or reduced I) can form in rainwater and aerosols. The interconversion between ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and I^- at the pH of wet deposition also leads to HOI and I₂, which can react with organic material forming C-I bonds that can release I^- (section 4.6). This material has been given the term soluble organically bound iodine and can be larger than the sum of the concentrations of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ and I^- in aerosols (Gilfedder et al., 2008; Droste et al., 2021). Soluble organically bound iodine can form from release of natural organic iodine from land and sea (a primary source) or from the reaction of natural organic material with HOI or I₂ in the atmosphere (a secondary source). On photolysis of C-I, I• forms and reacts with O₃, and on C-I reaction with nucleophiles, I^- forms. During a study on the formation of cloud condensation nuclei, Huang et al. (2022) also showed that natural gaseous organic material in the marine boundary layer reacts with ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ in aerosols resulting in gaseous I₂, which can be reoxidized to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ (catalysis) or react to form organic-I compounds. Lastly, Cuevas et al. (2022) reported that photolysis of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ particles in the stratosphere at a wavelength of about 260 nm can lead to gaseous I• and O₂ during transport from the tropics to the Antarctic region. Thus, there are several pathways for reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ in the atmosphere.

5 Conclusions

The reduction of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to I^- in solution is a facile process by biotic and abiotic reactions. The intermediates ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ and HOI dictate the reactivity sequence via a combination of thermodynamic and kinetic considerations. The ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ conversion is the least favorable and likely controlling step in this reaction sequence, but there is no need for nitrate reductase for ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction based on numerous studies. The data from this study indicate that once ${\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ forms there is no thermodynamic barrier to I^- formation. Chemical reduction of all iodine species (not iodide) by sulfide, Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ are favorable at seawater and sedimentary pH values, but only sulfide has been studied in the laboratory at oceanic pH values. Dissimilatory ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ reduction during organic matter decomposition seems to be a key process as the ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}/{\text{IO}}_2^{-}$ couple is more favorable than the ${\text{NO}}_3^{-}/{\text{NO}}_2^{-}$ couple.

However, the oxidation of I^- back to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ via ³O₂ has a major thermodynamic barrier in solution, and the disproportionation of HOI at seawater pH values is not measurable. Thus, ROS, oxidized Mn and microbes are important for I^- oxidation to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ due to favorable thermodynamics and kinetics (Table 2). Recent reports of microbial oxidation have not documented the entire six-electron oxidation in a stepwise manner so further work on this topic is necessary. Oxidation of I^- by oxidized Mn is a pH dependent reaction and less likely at seawater pH values but could occur in sedimentary environments. The reactions of O₃ and •OH with iodine species (not ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$) are thermodynamically favorable over all pH. However, ROS are not normally in significant concentration in seawater to influence ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ formation. Notable exceptions are for (1) sea surface microlayer, which adsorbs atmospheric O₃, and (2) the reaction of Fe²⁺ with O₂ that leads to Fenton chemistry with •OH production. Systems where Fenton chemistry can occur are at/near hydrothermal vents (Shaw et al., 2021), submarine groundwaters (Burns et al., 2010), and sediments or water columns where O₂ and Fe²⁺ concentration profiles overlap including ancient earth (Chan et al., 2016).

I^- is a major sink for O₃ in the sea surface microlayer and the atmosphere. ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ formation in the atmosphere and ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ redeposition to surface seawater may be major iodine processes with the latter being similar to the deposition of trace metals from wet and dry deposition to the surface ocean (e.g., Chance et al., 2015; Meskhidze et al., 2019). Most atmospheric iodine originates from marine sources where I^- oxidation to I₂ and homolytic cleavage of C-I bonds occurs; thus, gaseous iodine emissions from the ocean are reduced. ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ forms from these sources during oxidation by O₃ in the atmosphere. An estimate of atmospheric deposition of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ to the ocean surface could be made by using the amount of ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ in rainwater and aerosols that would be returned to the ocean surface, but more information on iodine speciation in rainwater and aerosols is needed as global spatial coverage appears limited. Despite major advances in iodine geochemistry over the last two decades, significant research is still needed on the processes that affect I^- oxidation to ${\text{IO}}_3^{-}$ in the atmosphere, seawater and ocean sediments.

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks NSF for funding his group’s research on iodine marine chemistry over his career, and Thomas Church and Timothy Ferdelman for suggesting the author’s initial foray into iodine chemistry. The author thanks the reviewers and guest editor, Rosie Chance, for their comments and constructive suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Allard S., Gallard H. (2013). Abiotic formation of methyl iodide on synthetic birnessite: A mechanistic study. Sci. Total Environ. 463–464, 169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Allard S., von Gunten U., Sahli E., Nicolau R., Gallard H. (2009). Oxidation of iodide and iodine on birnessite (δ-MnO2) in the pH range 4–8. Water Res. 43, 3417–3426. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amachi S. (2008). Microbial contribution to global iodine cycling: volatilization, accumulation, reduction, oxidation, and sorption of iodine. Microbes Environ. 23 (4), 269–276. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me08548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amachi S., Iino T. (2022). The genus Iodidimonas: From its discovery to potential applications. Microorganisms 10, 1661. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amachi S., Kawaguchi N., Muramatsu Y., Tsuchiya S., Watanabe Y., Shinoyama H., et al. (2007). Dissimilatory iodate reduction by marine pseudomonas sp. strain SCT. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5725–5730. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00241-07

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anschutz P., Sundby B., Lefrançois L., Luther III, G. W., Mucci A. (2000). Interactions between metal oxides and species of nitrogen and iodine in bioturbated marine sediments, geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64, 2751–2763. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00400-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baker A. R., Tunnicliffe C., Jickells T. D. (2001). Iodine speciation and deposition fluxes from the marine atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 28743–28749. doi: 10.1029/2000JD000004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bard A. J., Parsons R., Jordan J. (1985). Standard potentials in aqueous solution. 1st ed (New York: M. Dekker), 834.

Google Scholar

Bielski B. H. J., Cabelli D. E., Arudi R. L., Ross A. B. (1985). Reactivity of HO₂/O₂^- radicals in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14, 1041–1100. doi: 10.1063/1.555739

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bluhm K., Croot P., Wuttig K., Lochte K. (2010). Transformation of iodate to iodide in marine phytoplankton driven by cell senescence. Aquat. Biol. 11, 1–15. doi: 10.3354/ab00284

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burns J. M., Craig P. S., Shaw T. J., Ferry J. L. (2010). Multivariate examination of Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycling and consequent hydroxyl radical generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7226–7231. doi: 10.1021/es903519m

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Butler A., Sandy M. (2009). Mechanistic considerations of halogenating enzymes. Nature 460, 848–854. doi: 10.1038/nature08303

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buxton G. V., Greenstock C. L., Helman W. P., Ross A. B. (1988). Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17, 513–886. doi: 10.1063/1.555805

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campos M., Farrenkopf A., Jickells T., Luther G. (1996). A comparison of dissolved iodine cycling at the Bermuda Atlantic time-series station and Hawaii ocean time-series station. Deep-Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 43 (2), 455–466. doi: 10.1016/0967-0645(95)00100-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campos M. L. A. M., Nightingale P. D., Jickells T. D. (1996). A comparison of methyl iodide emissions from seawater and wet depositional fluxes of iodine over the southern north Sea. Tellus 48, 106–114. doi: 10.3402/tellusb.v48i1.15830

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carpenter L. J., Chance R. J., Sherwen T., Adams T. J., Ball S. M., Evans M. J., et al. (2021). Marine iodine emissions in a changing world. Proc. R. Soc A 477, 20200824. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0824

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carpenter L., MacDonald S., Shaw M., Kumar R., Saunders R. W., Parthipan R., et al. (2013). Atmospheric iodine levels influenced by sea surface emissions of inorganic iodine. Nat. Geosci. 6, 108–111. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1687

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carrano M. W., Yarimizu K., Gonzales J. L., Cruz-López R., Edwards M. S., Tymon T. M., et al. (2020). The influence of marine algae on iodine speciation in the coastal ocean. Algae 35 (2), 167–176. doi: 10.4490/algae.2020.35.5.25

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chance R. J., Jickells T. D., Baker A. R. (2015). Atmospheric trace metal concentrations, solubility and deposition fluxes in remote marine air over the south-east Atlantic. Mar. Chem. 177, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chance R., Malin G., Jickells T., Baker A. R. (2007). Reduction of iodate to iodide by cold water diatom cultures. Mar. Chem. 105, 169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2006.06.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chance R. J., Tinel L., Sherwen T., Baker A. R., Bell T., Brindle J., et al. (2019). Global sea-surface iodide observations 1967–2018. Sci. Data 6, 286. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0288-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chan C. S., Emerson D., Luther G. (2016). The role of microaerophilic fe-oxidizing micro-organisms in producing banded iron formations. Geobiology 14, 509–528. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colin C., Leblanc C., Wagner E., Delage L., Leize-Wagner E., van Dorsselaer A., et al. (2003). The brown algal kelp laminaria digitata features distinct bromoperoxidase and iodoperoxidase activities. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23545–23552. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300247200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Councell T. B., Landa E. R., Lovely D. R. (1997). Microbial reduction of iodate. Water Air Soil pollut. 100, 99–106. doi: 10.1023/A:1018370423790

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cuevas C. A., Fernandez R. P., Kinnison D. E., Li Q., Lamarques J.-F., Trabelsi T., et al. (2022). The influence of iodine on the Antarctic stratospheric ozone hole. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, No. 7, e2110864119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110864119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cutter G. A., Moffett J. G., Nielsdottir M. C., Sanial V. (2018). Multiple oxidation state trace elements in suboxic waters off Peru: in situ redox processes and advective/diffusive horizontal transport. Mar. Chem. 201, 77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2018.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Damgaard L. R., Jelly C., Casciotti K., Ward B. B., Revsbech N. P. (2020). Amperometric sensor for nanomolar nitrous oxide analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1101, 135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.12.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de la Cuesta J. L., Manley S. L. (2009). Iodine assimilation by marine diatoms and other phytoplankton in nitrate-replete conditions. Limnology Oceanogr. 54, 1653–1664. doi: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.5.1653

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Droste E. S., Baker A. R., Yodle C., Smith A., Ganzeveld L. (2021). Soluble iodine speciation in marine aerosols across the Indian and pacific ocean basins. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 788105. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.788105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elderfield H., Truesdale V. W. (1980). On the biophilic nature of iodine in seawater. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 50, 105–114. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(80)90122-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Estes E. R., Berti D., Findlay A. J., Hochella M. F. Jr., Shaw T. J., Yücel M., et al. (2022). Differential behavior of metal sulfides in hydrothermal plumes and diffuse flows. ACS Earth Space Chem. 6, 1429–1442. doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00377

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrenkopf A. M., Dollhopf M. E., Chadhain S. N., Luther G. W., Nealson K. H. (1997). Reduction of iodate in seawater during Arabian Sea shipboard incubations and in laboratory cultures of the marine bacterium Shewanella putrefaciens strain MR-4. Mar. Chem. 57 (3), 347–354. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00039-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrenkopf A. M., Luther G. W. (2002). Iodine chemistry reflects productivity and denitrification in the Arabian Sea: Evidence for flux of dissolved species from sediments of western India into the OMZ. Deep-Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr 49 (12), 2303–2318. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00038-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Finkenzeller H., Iyer S., He X. C., Simon M., Koenig T. K., Lee C. F., et al. (2022). The gas-phase formation mechanism of iodic acid as an atmospheric aerosol source. Nat. Chem 15, 129-135. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-01067-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fox P. M., Davis J. A., Luther III, G. W. (2009). The kinetics of iodide oxidation by the manganese oxide mineral birnessite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 2850–2861. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.02.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Freing A., Wallace D. W. R., Bange H. W. (2012). Global oceanic production of nitrous oxide. Phil. Trans. R. Soc B 367, 1245–1255. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gilfedder B. S., Lai S. C., Petri M., Biester H., Hoffmann T. (2008). Iodine speciation in rain, snow and aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 6069–6084. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-6069-2008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo J., Jiang J., Peng Z., Zhong Y., Jiang Y., Jiang Z., et al. (2022). Global occurrence of the bacteria with capability for extracellular reduction of iodate. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1070601

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardisty D. H., Horner T. J., Evans Z. C., Moriyasu R., Babbin A. R., Wankel S. D., et al. (2021). Limited in situ iodate reduction within the Eastern tropical north pacific oxygen deficient zone. Earth Planetary Sci. Lett. 554, 116676. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardisty D. H., Horner T. J., Wankel S. D., Blusztajn J., Nielsen S. G. (2020). Experimental observations of marine iodide oxidation using a novel sparge interface MC-ICP-MS technique. Chem. Geol. 532, 119360. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119360

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harvey G. R. (1980). A study of the chemistry of iodine and bromine in marine sediments. Mar. Chem. 8, 327–332. doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(80)90021-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He X.-C., Tham Y. J., Dada L., Wang M., Finkenzeller H., Stolzenberg D., et al. (2021). Role of iodine oxoacids in atmospheric aerosol nucleation. Science 371, 589–595. doi: 10.1126/science.abe0298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hepach H., Hughes C., Hogg K., Collings S., Chance R. (2020). Senescence as the main driver of iodide release from a diverse range of marine phytoplankton. Biogeosciences 17, 2453–2471. doi: 10.5194/bg-17-2453-2020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hou X. L., Aldahan A., Nielsen S. P., Possnert G. (2009). Time series of I-129 and I-127 speciation in precipitation from Denmark. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6522–6528. doi: 10.1021/es9012678

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang R.-J., Hoffmann T., Ovadnevaite J., Laaksonen A., Kokkola H., Xu W., et al. (2022). Heterogeneous iodine-organic chemistry fast-tracks marine new particle formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2201729119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201729119

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hughes C., Barton E., Hepach H., Chance R., Pickering M. D., Hogg K., et al. (2021). Oxidation of iodide to iodate by cultures of marine ammonia-oxidising bacteria. Mar. Chem. 234, 104000. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2021.104000

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hung C.-C., Wong G. T. F., Dunstan W. M. (2005). Iodate reduction activity in nitrate reductase extracts from marine phytoplankton. Bul. Mar. Sci. 76, 61–72.

Google Scholar

Kaltsoyannis N., Plane J. M. C. (2008). Quantum chemical calculations on a selection of iodine-containing species (IO, OIO, INO₃, (IO)₂, I2O₃, I2O₄ and I2O₅) of importance in the atmosphere. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 1723–1733. doi: 10.1039/b715687c

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kennedy H. A., Elderfield H. (1987a). Iodine diagenesis in pelagic deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmchim. Acta 51, 2489–2504. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90300-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kennedy H. A., Elderfield H. (1987b). Iodine diagenesis in non-pelagic deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmchim. Acta 51, 2505–2514. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(87)90301-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim K., Ju J., Kim B., Chung H. Y., Vetráková L., Heger D., et al. (2019). Nitrite-induced activation of iodate into molecular iodine in frozen solution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4892–4900. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06638

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Koenig T. K., Baidar S., Campuzano-Jost P., Cuevas C. A., Dix B., Fernandez R. P., et al. (2020). Quantitative detection of iodine in the stratosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 1860–1866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916828117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Küpper F. C., Carpenter L. J., McFiggans G. B., Palmer C. J., Waite T. J., Boneberg E.-M., et al. (2008). Iodide accumulation provides kelp with an inorganic antioxidant impacting atmospheric chemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 6954–6958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709959105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Küpper F. C., Feiters M. C., Olofsson B., Kaiho T., Yanagida S., Zimmermann M. B., et al. (2011). Commemorating two centuries of iodine research: An interdisciplinary overview of current research. Angewandte Chemie Int. Editions 50, 11598–11620. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100028

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lehner P., Larndorfer C., Garcia-Robledo E., Larsen M., Borisov S. M., Revsbech N.-P., et al. (2015). LUMOS - a sensitive and reliable optode system for measuring dissolved oxygen in the nanomolar range. PloS One 10 (6), e0128125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis B. L., Luther III, G. W. (2000). Processes controlling the distribution and cycling of manganese in the oxygen minimum zone of the Arabian Sea. Deep Sea Res. 47, 1541–1561. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(99)00153-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li H.-P., Daniel B., Creeley D., Grandbois R., Zhang S., Xu C., et al. (2014). Superoxide production by a manganese-oxidizing bacterium facilitates iodide oxidation. Appl. Environ. Microbio 80, 2693–2699. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00400-14

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu Q., Schurter L. M., Muller C. E., Aloisio S., Francisco J. S., Margerum D. W. (2001). Kinetics and mechanisms of aqueous ozone reactions with bromide, sulfite, hydrogen sulfite, iodide, and nitrite ions. Inorg. Chem. 40, 4436–4442. doi: 10.1021/ic000919j

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li H.-P., Yeager C. M., Brinkmeyer R., Zhang S., Ho Y.-F., Xu C., et al. (2012). Bacterial production of organic acids enhances H₂O₂-dependent iodide oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 4837–4844. doi: 10.1021/es203683v

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther III, G. W. (2010). The role of one and two electron transfer reactions in forming thermodynamically unstable intermediates as barriers in multi-electron redox reactions. Aquat. Geochem. 16, 395–420. doi: 10.1007/s10498-009-9082-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther III, G. W. (2011). Thermodynamic redox calculations for one and two electron transfer steps: Implications for halide oxidation and halogen environmental cycling. In Aquatic Redox Chemistry editors, Tratnyek P. G., Grundl T. J., Haderlein S. B. (Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society) 15–35. doi: 10.1021/.bk-2011-1071.ch002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther III, G. W. (2016). Inorganic chemistry for geochemistry and environmental sciences: Fundamentals and applications. (Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) 456.

Google Scholar

Luther G. W., Campbell T. (1991). Iodine speciation in the water column of the black Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part A. Oceanographic Res. Papers 38, S875–S882. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-2608-3_11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther G. W. III, Karolewski J. S., Sutherland K. M., Hansel C. M., Wankel S. D. (2021). The abiotic nitrite oxidation by ligand-bound manganese (III): the chemical mechanism. Aquat. Geochem. 27, 207–220. doi: 10.1007/s10498-021-09396-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther III, G. W., Popp J. I. (2002). Kinetics of the abiotic reduction of polymeric manganese dioxide by nitrite: An anaerobic nitrification reaction. Aquat. Geochem. 8, 15–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1020325604920

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luther III, G. W., Wu J., Cullen J. (1995). “Redox chemistry of iodine in seawater: frontier molecular orbital theory considerations,” in Aquatic chemistry: Interfacial and interspecies processes, vol. 244 . Eds. Huang C. P., O'Melia C. R., Morgan J. J. (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society), 135–155. doi: 10.1021/ba-1995-0244.ch006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martín J. C. G., Lewis T. R., James A. D., Saiz-Lopez A., Plane J. M. C. (2022). Insights into the chemistry of iodine new particle formation: The role of iodine oxides and the source of iodic acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc 144, 9240–9253. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12957

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meskhidze N., Völker C., Al-Abadleh H. A., Barbeau K., Bressac M., Buck C., et al. (2019). Perspective on identifying and characterizing the processes controlling iron speciation and residence time at the atmosphere-ocean interface mar. Chem. 217, 103704. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2019.103704

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moffett J. W., German C. R. (2020). Distribution of iron in the Western Indian ocean and the Eastern tropical south pacific: An inter-basin comparison. Chem. Geol. 532, 119334. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119334

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohammed A., Liebhafsky H. A. (1934). The kinetics of the reduction of hydrogen peroxide by the halides. J. Amer. Chem. Soc 56, 1680–1685. doi: 10.1021/ja01323a009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mok J. K., Toporek Y. L., Hyun-Dong S., Lee B. D., Lee M. H., DiChristina T. J. (2018). Iodate reduction by shewanella oneidensis does not involve nitrate reductase. Geomicrobiol. J 35, 570-579. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2018.1430189

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mopper K., Zhou X. (1990). Hydroxyl radical photoproduction in the sea and its potential impact on marine processes. Science 250, 661–664. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4981.661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Müller E., von Gunten U., Bouchet S., Droz B., Winkel L. H. E. (2021). Reaction of DMS and HOBr as a sink for marine DMS and an inhibitor of bromoform formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 5547–5558. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oldham V. E., Jones M. R., Siebecker M., Mucci A., Tebo B. M., Luther III, G. W. (2019). The speciation and mobility of Mn and fe in estuarine sediments. Aquat. Geochemistry 25, 3–26. doi: 10.1007/s10498-019-09351-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ooki A., Minamikawa K., Meng F., Miyashita N., Hirawake T., Ueno H., et al. (2022). Marine sediment as a likely source of methyl and ethyl iodides in subpolar and polar seas. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 180. doi: 10.1038/s43247-022-00513-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Owings S. M., Laurie Bréthous L., Eitel E. M., Fields B. P., Boever A., Beckler J. S., et al. (2021). Differential manganese and iron recycling and transport in continental margin sediments of the northern gulf of Mexico. Mar. Chem. 229, 103908. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2020.103908

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Powers L. C., Miller W. L. (2014). Blending remote sensing data products to estimate photochemical production of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide in the surface ocean. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 16, 792–806. doi: 10.1039/C3EM00617D

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Revsbech N. P., Larsen L. H., Gundersen J., Dalsgaard T., Ulloa O., Thamdrup B. (2009). Determination of ultra-low oxygen concentrations in oxygen minimum zones by the STOX sensor. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 7, 371–381. doi: 10.4319/lom.2009.7.371

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reyes-Umana V., Henning Z., Lee K., Barnum T. P., Coates J. D. (2022). Genetic and phylogenetic analysis of dissimilatory iodate-reducing bacteria identifies potential niches across the world’s oceans. ISME J. 16, 38–49. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01034-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rickard D., Luther III, G. W. (2007). Chemistry of iron sulfides. Chem. Rev. 107, 514–562. doi: 10.1021/cr0503658

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rue E. L., Smith G. J., Cutter G. A., Bruland K. W. (1997). The response of trace element redox couples to suboxic conditions in the water column. deep-Sea res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 44 (1), 113–134. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(96)00088-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmitz G. (2008). Inorganic reactions of Iodine(III) in acidic solutions and free energy of iodous acid formation. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 40, 647–652. doi: 10.1002/kin.20344

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwarz H. A., Bielski B. H. J. (1986). Reactions of HO₂ and O2^- with iodine and bromine and the I₂^- and I atom reduction potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 90, 1445–1448. doi: 10.1021/j100398a045

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shaw T. J., Luther G. W. III, Rosas R., Oldham V. E., Coffey N. R., Ferry J. L., et al. (2021). Fe-catalyzed sulfide oxidation in hydrothermal plumes is a source of reactive oxygen species to the ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118 (40), e2026654118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026654118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shimmield G. B., Pedersen T. F. (1990). The geochemistry of reactive trace metals and halogens in hemipelagic continental margin sediments. Rev. Aquat. Sci. 3, 255–279.

Google Scholar

Shin H.-D., Toporek Y., Mok J. K., Maekawa R., Lee B. D., Howard M. H., et al. (2022). Iodate reduction by Shewanella oneidensis requires genes encoding an extracellular dimethylsulfoxide reductase. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.852942

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sipilä M., Sarnela N., Jokinen T., Henschel H., Junninen H, Kontkanen J., et al. (2016). Molecular-scale evidence of aerosol particle formation via sequential addition of HIO₃. Nature 537, 532–534. doi: 10.1038/nature19314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanbury D. (1989). “Reduction potentials involving inorganic free radicals in aqueous solution,” in Advances in inorganic chemistry, vol. 33 . Ed. Sykes A. G. (New York: Academic Press), 69–138.

Google Scholar

Stumm W., Morgan J. J. (1996). Aquatic chemistry. 3rd edition (New York: John Wiley), 1022.

Google Scholar

Sunday M. O., Takeda K., Sakugawa H. (2020). Singlet oxygen photogeneration in coastal seawater: Prospect of Large-scale modeling in seawater surface and its environmental significance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 6125–6133. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sutherland K. M., Wankel S. D., Hansel C. M. (2020). Dark biological superoxide production as a significant flux and sink of marine dissolved oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 3433–3439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912313117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szlamkowicz I. B., Fentress A. J., Longen L. F., Stanberry J. S., Anagnostopoulos V. A. (2022). Transformations and speciation of iodine in the environment as a result of oxidation by manganese minerals. ACS Earth Space Chem. 6, 1948–1956. doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00372

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teiwes R., Elm J., Bilde M., Pedersen H. B. (2019). The reaction of hydrated iodide I(H₂O)^- with ozone: A new route to IO₂^- products. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 17546–17554. doi: 10.1039/C9CP01734H

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trouwborst R. E., Clement B. G., Tebo B. M., Glazer B. T., Luther G. W. III (2006). Soluble Mn(III) in suboxic zones. Science 313, 1955–1957. doi: 10.1126/science.1132876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Truesdale V. W., Jones S. D. (1996). The variation of iodate and total iodine in some UK rainwaters during 1980-1981. J. Hydrology 179, 67–86. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02873-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Truesdale V. W., Luther III, G. W. (1995). Molecular iodine reduction by natural and model organic substances in seawater. Aquat. Geochem. 1, 89–104. doi: 10.1007/BF01025232

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Truesdale V. W., Watts S. F., Rendell A. (2001). On the possibility of iodide oxidation in the near-surface of the black Sea and its implications to iodine in the general ocean. Deep-Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap 48 (11), 2397–2412. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00021-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waite T. J., Truesdale V. W. (2003). Iodate reduction by Isochrysis galbana is relatively insensitive to de-activation of nitrate reductase activity–are phytoplankton really responsible for iodate reduction in seawater? Mar. Chem. 81, 137–148.

Google Scholar

Weiss R. F., Price B. A. (1980). Nitrous oxide solubility in water and seawater. Mar Chem. 8, 347–359. doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(80)90024-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whalley L. K., Furneaux K. L., Goddard A., Lee J. D., Mahajan A., Oetjen H., et al. (2010). The chemistry of OH and HO₂ radicals in the boundary layer over the tropical Atlantic ocean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1555–1576. doi: 10.5194/acp-10-1555-2010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilkinson F., Helman W. P., Ross A. B. (1995). Rate constants for the decay and reactions of the lowest electronically excited singlet state of molecular oxygen in solution. expanded revised compilation. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 24, 663–1021. doi: 10.1063/1.555965

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong G. T. F. (1991). The marine geochemistry of iodine. Rev. Aquat. Sci. 4, 45–73.

Google Scholar

Wong G. T. F. (2001). Coupling iodine speciation to primary, regenerated or "new" production: A re-evaluation. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanographic Res. Papers 48, 1459–1476. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00097-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong G. T., Brewer P. G. (1977). The marine chemistry of iodine in anoxic basins. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 41 (1), 151–159. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90195-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong G. T. F., Piumsomboon A. U., Dunstan W. M. (2002). The transformation of iodate to iodide in marine phytoplankton cultures. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 237, 27–39. doi: 10.3354/meps237027

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong G. T., Takayanagi K., Todd J. T. (1985). Dissolved iodine in waters overlying and in the orca basin, gulf of Mexico. Mar. Chem. 17, 177–183. doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(85)90072-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wong G. T., Zhang L.-S. (2008). The kinetics of the reactions between iodide and hydrogen peroxide in seawater. Mar. Chem. 111, 22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2007.04.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamazaki C., Kashiwa S., Horiuchi A., Kasahara Y., Yamamura S., Amachi S. A. (2020). Novel dimethylsulfoxide reductase family of molybdenum enzyme. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 2196–2212. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14988

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan J., Shiller A. M. (2001). The distribution of hydrogen peroxide in the southern and central Atlantic ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr 48, 2947–2970. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00026-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang J.-Z., Whitfield M. (1986). Kinetics of inorganic reactions in seawater. 1. the reduction of iodate by bisulphide. Mar. Chem. 19, 121–137. doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(86)90044-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Žic V., Branica M. (2006). The distributions of iodate and iodide in rogoznica lake (East Adriatic coast). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 66 (1), 55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.07.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Žic V., Truesdale V. W., Cukrov N. (2008). The distribution of iodide and iodate in anchialine cave waters–evidence for sustained localised oxidation of iodide to iodate in marine water. Mar. Chem. 112 (3–4), 168–178. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2008.09.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar