Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1392673

Recommendations for Advancing Mixoplankton Research through Empirical-Model Integration Provisionally Accepted

  • 1William & Mary's Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, United States
  • 2University of Southern California, United States
  • 3Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, United States
  • 4Princeton University, United States
  • 5St. Mary's College of Maryland, United States
  • 6Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, United States
  • 7University of Arizona, United States
  • 8Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences, United States
  • 9Penn State Schuylkill, United States
  • 10University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 11University of California, Santa Barbara, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Receive an email when it is updated
You just subscribed to receive the final version of the article

Protist plankton can be divided into three main groups: phytoplankton, zooplankton, and mixoplankton. In situ methods for studying phytoplankton and zooplankton are relatively straightforward since they generally target chlorophyll/photosynthesis or grazing activity, while the integration of both processes within a single cell makes mixoplankton inherently challenging to study. As a result, we understand less about mixoplankton physiology and their role in food webs, biogeochemical cycling, and ecosystems compared to phytoplankton and zooplankton. In this paper, we posit that by merging conventional techniques, such as microscopy and physiological data, with innovative methods like in situ single-cell sorting and omics datasets, in conjunction with a diverse array of modeling approaches ranging from single-cell modeling to comprehensive Earth system models, we can propel mixoplankton research into the forefront of aquatic ecology. We present eight crucial research questions pertaining to mixoplankton and mixotrophy, and briefly outline a combination of existing methods and models that can be used to address each question. Our intent is to encourage more interdisciplinary research on mixoplankton, thereby expanding the scope of data acquisition and knowledge accumulation for this understudied yet critical component of aquatic ecosystems.

Keywords: mixoplankton, mixotrophy, methods, evolution; trade-offs, biogeography, Food-webs

Received: 27 Feb 2024; Accepted: 20 May 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 Millette, Leles, Johnson, Maloney, Brownlee, Cohen, Duhamel, Poulton, Princiotta, Stamieszkin, Wilken and Moeller. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Nicole Millette, William & Mary's Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, United States