%A Madden,Pádhraig %A Al-Raei,Abdul M. %A Enright,Anne M. %A Chinalia,Fabio A. %A de Beer,Dirk %A O'Flaherty,Vincent %A Collins,Gavin %D 2014 %J Frontiers in Microbiology %C %F %G English %K Biogas,low-temperature anaerobic digestion,sulphate,sulphide,Methane,methanogenesis,wastewater %Q %R 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00376 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2014-July-24 %9 Original Research %+ Dr Gavin Collins,Infrastructure and Environment, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow,UK,gavin.collins@nuigalway.ie %+ Dr Gavin Collins,Microbiology, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway,Galway, Ireland,gavin.collins@nuigalway.ie %+ Dr Gavin Collins,Ryan Institute for Environmental, Marine and Energy Research, National University of Ireland Galway,Galway, Ireland,gavin.collins@nuigalway.ie %# %! SULPHATE IN LOW-TEMPERATURE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION %* %< %T Effect of sulfate on low-temperature anaerobic digestion %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00376 %V 5 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-302X %X The effect of sulfate addition on the stability of, and microbial community behavior in, low-temperature anaerobic expanded granular sludge bed-based bioreactors was investigated at 15°C. Efficient bioreactor performance was observed, with chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies of >90%, and a mean SO2−4 removal rate of 98.3%. In situ methanogensis appeared unaffected at a COD: SO2−4 influent ratio of 8:1, and subsequently of 3:1, and was impacted marginally only when the COD: SO2−4 ratio was 1:2. Specific methanogenic activity assays indicated a complex set of interactions between sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), methanogens and homoacetogenic bacteria. SO2−4 addition resulted in predominantly acetoclastic, rather than hydrogenotrophic, methanogenesis until >600 days of SO2−4-influenced bioreactor operation. Temporal microbial community development was monitored by denaturation gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rRNA genes. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations (FISH), qPCR and microsensor analysis were combined to investigate the distribution of microbial groups, and particularly SRB and methanogens, along the structure of granular biofilms. qPCR data indicated that sulfidogenic genes were present in methanogenic and sulfidogenic biofilms, indicating the potential for sulfate reduction even in bioreactors not exposed to SO2−4. Although the architecture of methanogenic and sulfidogenic granules was similar, indicating the presence of SRB even in methanogenic systems, FISH with rRNA targets found that the SRB were more abundant in the sulfidogenic biofilms. Methanosaeta species were the predominant, keystone members of the archaeal community, with the complete absence of the Methanosarcina species in the experimental bioreactor by trial conclusion. Microsensor data suggested the ordered distribution of sulfate reduction and sulfide accumulation, even in methanogenic granules.