Probiotic Bacteria Alter Pattern-Recognition Receptor Expression and Cytokine Profile in a Human Macrophage Model Challenged with Candida albicans and Lipopolysaccharide

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer benefits to the host health. The infection rate of potentially pathogenic organisms such as Candida albicans, the most common agent associated with mucosal candidiasis, can be reduced by probiotics. However, the mechanisms by which the probiotics interfere with the immune system are largely unknown. We evaluated the effect of probiotic bacteria on C. albicans challenged human macrophages. Macrophages were pretreated with lactobacilli alone (Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR32, Lactobacillus casei L324m, or Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM) or associated with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), followed by the challenge with C. albicans or LPS in a co-culture assay. The expression of pattern-recognition receptors genes (CLE7A, TLR2, and TLR4) was determined by RT-qPCR, and dectin-1 reduced levels were confirmed by flow cytometry. The cytokine profile was determined by ELISA using the macrophage cell supernatant. Overall probiotic lactobacilli down-regulated the transcription of CLEC7A (p < 0.05), resulting in the decreased expression of dectin-1 on probiotic pretreated macrophages. The tested Lactobacillus species down-regulated TLR4, and increased TLR2 mRNA levels in macrophages challenged with C. albicans. The cytokines profile of macrophages challenged with C. albicans or LPS were altered by the probiotics, which generally led to increased levels of IL-10 and IL-1β, and reduction of IL-12 production by macrophages (p < 0.05). Our data suggest that probiotic lactobacilli impair the recognition of PAMPs by macrophages, and alter the production of pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines, thus modulating inflammation.


INTRODUCTION
Candida albicans is the most common yeast isolated from the human mucosal surfaces (Scully et al., 1994). Despite its commensal nature, Candida causes oral and genital candidiasis that may evolve toward a systemic dissemination. For some decades, antifungals such as nystatin, amphotericin B, and fluconazole have been the drugs of choice for a successful treatment of oral candidiasis (McCullough and Savage, 2005). However, the administration of these agents may result in a temporary gastrointestinal disorder such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea (Lewis et al., 1991). The limited spectrum and toxicity of available antifungals, in addition to the gradual emergence of drug-resistant Candida strains (Niimi et al., 2010), bring urgency to alternative therapies against fungal infections, such as probiotic bacteria.
Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer benefits to the host (Sanders and Klaenhammer, 2001). Bacteria belonging to the genus Lactobacillus have been used as probiotics due to their association with the healthy gastrointestinal tract in humans (Dunne et al., 1999). Animal (Elahi et al., 2005;Matsubara et al., 2012) and human studies (Hatakka et al., 2007;Ishikawa et al., 2015) have shown that the daily consumption of probiotic bacteria may reduce the oral colonization of C. albicans. The available literature supports the use of probiotics in the management of mucosal candidiasis not only in the oral cavity but also in the urogenital system and gastrointestinal tract, both as adjuvant therapy and as a prophylactic agent (Matsubara et al., 2016a). In vivo and in vitro studies suggest the potential use of probiotics for preventing recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (Falagas et al., 2006a), and recurrent urinary tract infections in women (Falagas et al., 2006b). Despite these promising findings, further investigation based on clinical trials is needed to confirm these beneficial effects of probiotics for the human being before its widespread use.
The restoration of a natural healthy microbiome on mucosal surfaces seems to be the major effect of probiotics (Matsubara et al., 2016a). These beneficial microorganisms may control the establishment of opportunistic pathogens, such as C. albicans, on mucosal surfaces. This control might be possible by directly interfering with pathogen survival and virulence expression (Ribeiro et al., 2016;Wang et al., 2017), competing for nutrients and adhesion sites or modulating the host immune response (Saarela et al., 2000;Reid et al., 2011;Matsubara et al., 2016b). Probiotic lactobacilli were also found to affect C. albicans biofilm formation and filamentation (Matsubara et al., 2016b). The effect of probiotic bacteria can occur by direct interactions between cell surfaces or indirectly through their products (Rizzo et al., 2015), such as lactate, a major fermentation product of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), that regulates critical functions of macrophages and dendritic cells, and also modulates the inflammatory response of epithelial cells (Garrote et al., 2015). The innate immune system is the first line of defense against pathogens in the mucosa beyond the epithelial barrier (Romani, 2004), and the most important mechanism of protection against disseminated candidiasis (Soloviev et al., 2011). In this scenario, macrophages link the innate and the adaptive immune responses, due to their multifunctional characteristics that include phagocytic and microbicidal activities, a capacity of cytokines production, and antigen presentation (Auwerx, 1991;Romani, 2004).
The capacity of lactobacilli to induce the release of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages was found to be strain-specific, with lactobacilli cells promoting different responses compared to probiotic cell-free supernatants (Quinteiro-Filho et al., 2015). On the other hand, another study showed that both Lactobacillus crispatus cells and its supernatant enhanced the anti-inflammatory response of macrophages and epithelial cell by increasing the production of the regulatory cytokine IL-10 and reducing the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 (Rizzo et al., 2015).
The recognition of C. albicans pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by macrophages is mediated by an array of membrane-bound and soluble pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) (Brown, 2011), such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors, including dectin-1, and the galectin family proteins (Taylor et al., 2002). Dectin-1 is the primary receptor for C. albicans in phagocytic cells, which recognizes β-glucans of Candida cell wall. This recognition leads to an orchestrated signaling that culminates in phagocytosis, antimicrobial effector functions, and production of defensins, chemokines, cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Brown, 2011;Romani, 2011). TLR4 in turn not only recognizes mannan of fungi cell wall but also LPS from Gram-negative bacteria (Brown, 2011).
Lactobacilli were found to attenuate the adaptive and innate immune responses in macrophages challenged by LPS or lipoteichoic acid of other bacteria (Pradhan et al., 2016). In turn, specific Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus casei strains enhanced the phagocytic and microbicidal activities of peritoneal macrophages in mice challenged with C. albicans (Marranzino et al., 2012). Despite these evidences, the effects of probiotics on human immune systems affected by Candida are is still unclear.
Hence, the present study sought to evaluate the influence of probiotics on the human response to C. albicans by determining the effect of three Lactobacillus strains on PRR (dectin-1, TLR4, and TLR2) expression, and measuring the impact of these probiotics on inflammatory cytokines production by human macrophages challenged with C. albicans and LPS.

Microorganisms and Culture Conditions
Candida albicans ATCC SC5314, isolated from human clinical infection (Jones et al., 2004), and the probiotic strains L. rhamnosus LR32, Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM (Danisco, Madison, WI, United States) and L. casei L324m (clinical isolate, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil) were used (Matsubara et al., 2016b). All strains were stored in 20% glycerol at −80 • C prior to the experiments.
Viability of THP-1 cells was maintained after co-culture of macrophages in any of the studied conditions and it was assessed by trypan blue exclusion assay (Barker et al., 2005) Figure S1). Relative transcription of CLEC7A, TLR4 and TLR2, expression of dectin-1 on macrophage surface, and cytokines production were evaluated after the final incubation. All assays were carried out in triplicate in three independent assays.

(Supplementary
Relative Transcription of CLEC7A, TLR4, and TLR2 Macrophages were lysed and total RNA was extracted using RNeasy KIT (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, United States). The concentration, purity, and quality of the isolated RNA samples were determined using a Nano DropOne/One Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). The RNA from each sample was immediately reverse transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript VILO MasterMix (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, United States). The conditions for reverse transcription were 15 min at 37 • C, 5 s at 85 • C. Relative expression levels of CLEC7A, TLR4, and TLR2 were evaluated by quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR), using TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosciences, Foster City, CA, United States), TaqMan primers and probes for CLEC7A (Hs01902549_sl), TLR4 (Hs01060206_m1), TLR2 (Hs00152932_m1), and GAPDH (Hs02758991_gl) and 100 ng of cDNA in each reaction. The RT-qPCR comprised an initial step of 50 • C for 2 min, 95 • C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles at 95 • C for 15 s, and 50 • C for 1 min, using Step One Plus System (Applied Biosciences). All data were normalized to GAPDH transcripts levels in the same cDNA set (Pfaffl, 2001;Gantner et al., 2005).

Expression of Dectin-1 on Macrophages Surface
After the final incubation, macrophages were washed with PBS and treated with Accutase TM cell detachment solution (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States). Cells were incubated with Fc Block TM (Human BD Fc Block, BD Biosciences) and stained with either an anti-human Clec7a -Dectin-1 antibody or an isotype control (5 µl/million cells, both labeled with PE from BD Biosciences) (30 min, 4 • C in the dark) (Supplementary Figure S2). After washing with PBS, stained cells were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for at least 10,000 events (Guava easyCyte TM Flow Cytometers -Merck Millipore, Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany).

Cytokine Profile
The concentrations of TNF-α, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), and IL-1β secreted by macrophages after 3 h of co-culture were determined in macrophage cells supernatants by ELISA (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States) following the manufacturer's recommendation. The cytokines levels were determined by comparison with a standard calibration curve.

Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's Multiple Comparison test was used for statistical analyses. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (GraphPad Prism R Version 6.0c -GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States).

Probiotics Alter the Cytokine Profile of Macrophages Challenged with LPS and/or Candida albicans
In order to evaluate the effect of probiotic bacteria on macrophages challenged with C. albicans and/or LPS, we first investigated the impact of C. albicans and LPS challenges on cytokine production by macrophages (Figure 2). The challenge with C. albicans alone was not able to induce a significant production of TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-12 (p > 0.01) as compared to control non-challenged macrophages, although the stimulus with C. albicans increased the level of IL-1β significantly (p < 0.01). In contrast, TNF-α and IL-10 levels were dramatically increased (p > 0.01) in the supernatants of macrophages challenged with LPS, but the same effect was not observed for IL-12 and IL-1β levels. The pretreatment with LPS before the challenge with C. albicans promoted a synergistic effect on macrophages when compared to macrophages challenged with C. albicans or LPS alone (except for TNF-α), inducing the highest levels of proinflammatory cytokines among the given groups. This was associated with an increase in the expression of clec7a (Figure 2E) in macrophages pretreated with LPS before C. albicans challenge.
The treatment of macrophages with probiotics affected the production of cytokines significantly, with similar performances for all three tested probiotic strains (Figure 3). The pretreatment with probiotic lactobacilli (Group 2) induced a significant production of TNF-α and IL1-β as compared to non-treated macrophages (Group 1). The pretreatment with probiotics on LPS challenged macrophages caused a substantial increase in the levels of IL1-β and IL-10, except for L. rhamnosus pretreated macrophages. On the contrary, the production of TNF-α and IL-12 by LPS stimulated macrophages was not affected by probiotic bacteria.
In turn, the probiotic pretreatment of macrophages challenged with C. albicans (Group 6) led to increased levels of TNF-α and IL-1β (p < 0.01), while the secretion of IL-10 was increased significantly only by L. acidophilus pretreated macrophages. In contrast, L. rhamnosus, L. acidophilus, and L. casei pretreatments reduced significantly (p < 0.05) the levels of IL-12. In the most complex situation simulated in our study, the effects of probiotics on increasing the production of IL-10 and IL-1β (except for L. casei), and decreasing IL-12 were observed in cells pretreated with LPS and challenged by C. albicans, in different levels according to the probiotic strain.

Probiotics Reduce Transcription of CLEC7A and Dectin-1 Expression in Macrophages
The pretreatment of macrophages with all three tested probiotics down-regulated the transcription of CLEC7A (p < 0.01) (Figure 4), which codifies dectin-1 receptors. L. rhamnosus was the most effective in down-regulating CLEC7A (p < 0.01) in macrophages pretreated with LPS and challenged with C. albicans compared to the remaining Lactobacillus strains. However, both L. acidophilus and L. casei induced higher down-regulation of CLEC7A than L. rhamnosus in macrophages with no additional challenge (Figure 4).
The reduced expression of dectin-1 receptor on macrophage surfaces promoted by probiotics was confirmed by flow cytometry (Figure 5). L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus presented similar percentage of cells expressing dectin-1, whereas L. casei was found to interfere to a lesser extent under all simulated conditions. The used antibody had no non-specific binding to either C. albicans or Lactobacillus cells (Supplementary Figure S3).
Probiotics Down-Regulate TLR4 and Up-Regulate TLR2 in Macrophages Challenged with C. albicans The challenge of macrophages with C. albicans was found to down-regulate TLR4 (Figure 6A). The tested Lactobacillus strains FIGURE 2 | Cytokine production [TNF-α (A), IL-10 (B), IL-12 (C), and IL-1β (D)], and transcription of CLEC7A (E) by macrophages challenged with LPS, C. albicans, or pretreated with LPS and challenged by C. albicans (LPS + C. albicans). Control group had neither challenge nor pretreatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05.
further reduced the transcription of this gene in macrophages stimulated by C. albicans, except for L. casei that increased TLR4 mRNA levels when the macrophages were pretreated with LPS and challenged by C. albicans (Figure 6C). In turn, the LPS challenge alone was not able to alter the transcription of TLR4 after 3 h of incubation (Figure 6A), but a significant decrease in the transcription of TLR4 was observed when these macrophages were pretreated with probiotics ( Figure 6C).
Macrophages challenged with LPS alone presented up-regulation of TLR2, while a reduced expression of this gene was observed when macrophages were challenged with C. albicans ( Figure 6B). However, the expression of TLR2 was entirely changed by probiotic pretreatments as the transcription of TLR2 was up-regulated in C. albicans challenged macrophages for all three Lactobacillus strains tested ( Figure 6B). Probiotics also promoted a significant (p < 0.01) decrease in TLR2 mRNA levels when the macrophages were challenged with LPS, except for macrophages pretreated with L. rhamnosus. It is noteworthy that the pretreatment of macrophages with L. acidophilus alone showed a unique effect increasing TLR2, while the other probiotic bacteria (L. rhamnosus and L. casei) reduced the transcription of this gene.
underlying this beneficial effect are still poorly understood, especially from the human immune system perspective. In the present study, we investigated how Lactobacillus species influence the immune response of human macrophages challenged by C. albicans, analyzing two important factors for the macrophages activity: production of pro-and antiinflammatory cytokines and expression of receptors for Candida recognition.
FIGURE 4 | Relative transcription of CLEC7A in macrophages pretreated with probiotics alone or with both LPS and probiotics for 12 h before being challenged with C. albicans or LPS for 3 h. L. rhamnosus LR32, L. casei L324m, and L. acidophilus NCFM were tested in these different situations. The transcription of CLEC7A was normalized to GAPDH reference gene (internal control). Groups with no probiotic bacteria pretreatment were set at 1. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * * p < 0.01.
Our study was designed to simulate different conditions encountered in the human mucosa. The LPS, during both pretreatment or challenge stimulus, represented Gram-negative bacteria colonizing the mucosal surfaces. The pretreatment of macrophages with LPS aimed to enhance the response of macrophages to C. albicans as demonstrated previously (Rogers et al., 2013). The LPS challenge, in turn, acted as a positive control to the C. albicans challenge groups. Groups 7 and 8 simulated the clinical situation where macrophages are continuously stimulated by endogenous bacteria before the overgrowth of C. albicans.
Macrophages with no probiotic pretreatment (Groups 1, 3, 5, and 7), challenged with C. albicans alone, produced only significant levels of IL-1β ( Figure 2D). However, the pretreatment of macrophages with LPS enhanced the response to C. albicans, which not only expanded the production of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-12, but also increased the secretion of the regulatory cytokine IL-10 (Figures 2A-D). It has already been demonstrated that the presence of bacterial LPS induces the expression of dectin-1 on macrophages, which in turn leads to an enhanced immune response against C. albicans (Rogers et al., 2013). This evidence corroborates with our results of up-regulation of transcription of CLEC7A in LPS challenged macrophages ( Figure 2E).
In lactobacilli pretreated macrophages, the probiotics supplied an additional 'reprogramming' stimulus suggesting their immunomodulatory effect, due to decreased production of IL-12, and increased levels of IL-10. The interference with the release of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines by human macrophages is probiotic-strain dependent, since strains of the same species may show opposite effects (Drago et al., 2010). Other lactobacilli species, such as L. crispatus, an important urogenital species routinely found in the vagina of healthy women, also enhanced the production of the IL-10, and reduced the proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages and epithelial cells challenged with Chlamydia trachomatis (Rizzo et al., 2015). This immunomodulatory effect induced by probiotic bacteria may lead to an enhanced capacity of macrophages to combat C. albicans infections. A previous in vivo study using a C. albicans infection murine model showed significant increase in the phagocytic and microbicidal activities of peritoneal macrophages of mice treated with L. rhamnosus and L. casei, which resulted in decreased levels of the pathogen in infected organs (Marranzino et al., 2012).
IL-10 is one of the most important immunosuppressive cytokines, aiming the maintenance of homeostasis (Ma et al., 2015), and its production can be enhanced by probiotics (Lucas et al., 2005). In turn, during pathogen infections, IL-12 produced by macrophages/monocytes and dendritic cells (Trinchieri, 1995) influences the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) by natural killer (NK) and T cells, which favor phagocytic cells activation and inflammation. IL-12 also plays an important role by favoring a T helper type 1 (Th1) response (Trinchieri, 1993). In our study, the reduction of IL-12 promoted by probiotics may be also associated with the increase in IL-10 levels, since IL-10 is a potent inhibitor of IL-12 production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (D'Andrea et al., 1993), by suppressing IL-12 production at the transcriptional level (Aste-Amezaga et al., 1998).
The significant increase of IL1-β production by lactobacillitreated macrophages after C. albicans challenge ( Figure 3C) may suggest that probiotic bacteria are activating inflammasome, as shown for L. rhamnosus (Miettinen et al., 2012). Since inflammasomes contribute to an anti-Candida response (Martinon et al., 2002), probiotic treatment may increase Candida elimination.
In our co-culture assay, L. rhamnosus LR32, L. casei L324m, and L. acidophilus NCFM induced similar cytokine profile in human macrophages, although the level of inhibition (e.g., IL-12) or stimulation (e.g., IL-10) in cytokines production varied according to the tested bacterial strain. These differences may be associated with their mechanisms to modulate TLR expression in phagocytic cells (Kotzamanidis et al., 2010). In fact, the tested L. rhamnosus strain down-regulated the expression of TLR4, L. casei up-regulated TLR4 and TLR2, whereas L. acidophilus decreased TLR4 and increased TLR2 transcription levels in C. albicans challenged macrophages.
The decreased expression of TLR4 in LAB pretreated macrophages observed in our study is in accordance with previous in vivo data reporting that probiotic lactobacilli reduce TLR4 mRNA levels and decrease TLR2 responses in blood mononuclear cells (Forsberg et al., 2014). In another study, the pretreatment with L. crispatus also downregulated the expression of TLR4 and TLR2 by epithelial cells challenged with C. albicans, suggesting that L. crispatus may act as an anti-inflammatory agent through TLR2/4 (Rizzo et al., 2013). Since TLR4 signaling culminates in the expression of genes encoding inflammatory molecules (Aksoy et al., 2012), the down-regulation of TLR4 transcription by L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus favors an anti-inflammatory effect, reducing the production of proinflammatory cytokines such IL-12 (Re and Strominger, 2001).
Our data also indicated that probiotics increased TLR2 mRNA levels in C. albicans challenged macrophages ( Figure 6D). C. albicans cell wall mannan and phospholipomannan are able to trigger TLR2-signaling (Brown, 2011), but the role of TLR2 signaling in controlling C. albicans infections is still contradictory. Increased susceptibility or resistance to infection with C. albicans were both showed in TLR2-deficient mice, due to reduced proinflammatory cytokines production or decreased IL-10/increased IL-12 and IFN-γ production, respectively (Brown, 2011). TLR2 and TLR4 signaling are not equivalent as TLR2 stimulus elicits less IL-12 (p70) than TLR4 (Re and Strominger, 2001), but induces abundant IL-10, favoring Th2 and T cytotoxic responses (Dillon et al., 2004). Thus, the up-regulation of TLR2 by Lactobacillus spp. in the presence of C. albicans ( Figure 6D) may partially explain the cytokine profile observed in our study (Figures 3B,D), with high IL-10 and low IL-12 levels after probiotics treatment.
All three tested probiotics down-regulated dectin-1 expression in Candida challenged macrophages. Even though bacterial LPS induces dectin-1 expression in macrophages (Rogers et al., 2013), the probiotic pretreatments were able to reduce dectin-1 expression even in LPS challenged macrophages (Figure 4), by down-regulating the transcription of CLEC7A. The importance of dectin-1 signaling to control commensal C. albicans levels in the gastrointestinal tract is still controversial. Individuals with genetic deficiencies associated with decreased expression of dectin-1 are more susceptible to fungal diseases (Romani, 2011). On the other hand, in an animal model, dectin-1 was found to be essential for controlling infection of the gastrointestinal tissues during systemic candidiasis, but it had no influence on gastrointestinal colonization of C. albicans in mice (Vautier et al., 2012).
The decrease of dectin-1 expression in macrophages promoted by L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus, and to a lesser FIGURE 6 | Relative transcription of TLR4 (A) and TLR2 (B) in macrophages challenged with LPS, C. albicans, or pretreated with LPS before C. albicans challenge. Transcription of TLR4 (C) and TLR2 (D) in macrophages pretreated with probiotics alone or both LPS and probiotics before C. albicans or LPS challenge. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH transcripts levels in the same cDNA set. Groups with no probiotic bacteria pretreatment were set at 1. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05; * * p < 0.01.
FIGURE 7 | Effects of Lactobacillus spp. on human macrophages challenged with C. albicans. There is an alteration in the transcription of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) genes (CLEC7A, TLR2, and TLR4) with a significant reduction of C. albicans receptors (dectin-1) on macrophages. These changes have an impact on the cytokine profile that leads to an anti-inflammatory effect. extent by L. casei, showed in our study, may indicate that these beneficial bacteria may limit an exacerbated inflammatory response originated from the recognition of C. albicans yeasts by macrophages. This inflammatory control may avoid tissue destruction that facilitates the establishment of C. albicans infections, but still allowing host defense mechanisms. This hypothesis is reinforced by a previous study showing that the dectin-1 level reduction is associated with an increased regulatory T cells differentiation and a local homeostasis, thus leading to ameliorate colitis (Tang et al., 2015). The downregulation of pro-inflammatory genes was also observed in murine macrophages treated with L. acidophilus (Pradhan et al., 2016). Furthermore, the capacity of probiotics to reduce yeastto-hyphae transition of C. albicans, as demonstrated previously by our group (Matsubara et al., 2016b), may also contribute to the reduction of local inflammation, as Candida remains in the commensal yeast form.
The alteration of C. albicans recognition by immune cells in the presence of lactobacilli may involve other mechanisms.
For instance, the exposure of C. albicans to lactate, produced by LAB, induces β-glucan masking in C. albicans by changing the expression of cell-wall-related genes (Ballou et al., 2016). As the fungal cell wall architecture play an essential role in the competitive colonization of Candida species in mucosal surfaces (Sem et al., 2016), the effect of probiotic bacteria on fungal cell wall needs to be further investigated.

CONCLUSION
Lactobacilli may contribute in the response against C. albicans colonization and infection by affecting the expression of dectin-1, TLR2, and TLR4 at the transcription level, thus altering the recognition of C. albicans and the cytokine profile of macrophages. This immunomodulation favors an antiinflammatory response to C. albicans colonization (Figure 7).
Our novel findings open new possibilities for the study of probiotics against C. albicans infections. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether the immune modulation is caused by a direct or an indirect effect of probiotic bacteria on macrophages. More studies testing other immune cells and analyzing different inflammatory signaling pathways will help to clarify the role of probiotic bacteria on Candida-host interactions.

ETHICS STATEMENT
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
VM designed and conducted experiments, analyzed data and wrote the article; KI helped with flow cytometer assay; EA-S helped with RT-qPCR assay; BB-S helped with cell culture experiments; AN gave a critical review of the manuscript; MM supervised the project and the article writing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) Foundation for supporting VM.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb. 2017.02280/full#supplementary-material FIGURE S1 | Number of viable macrophage cells after the final incubation in the different groups. Data are presented as cells/well.