<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00949</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Three Dimensional Vero Cell-Platform for Rapid and Sensitive Screening of Shiga-Toxin Producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>To</surname> <given-names>Celina Z.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/685505/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>Arun K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/198254/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Molecular Food Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Food Science, Purdue University</institution>, <addr-line>West Lafayette, IN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University</institution>, <addr-line>West Lafayette, IN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Purdue Institute of Inflammation, Immunology and Infectious Disease, Purdue University</institution>, <addr-line>West Lafayette, IN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Giovanna Suzzi, University of Teramo, Italy</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Mohamed Elhadidy, University of Science and Technology at Zewail City, Egypt; Lucia Galli, National University of La Plata, Argentina</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Arun K. Bhunia, <email>bhunia@purdue.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>949</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2019 To and Bhunia.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>To and Bhunia</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Shiga-toxin producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC) is a serious public health concern. Current Vero cell assay, although sensitive, is lengthy and requires 48&#x2013;72 h to assess STEC presence in a sample. In this study, we investigated if Vero cells in a three-dimensional (3D) platform would provide improved sensitivity for rapid screening of STEC. Vero cells (epithelial kidney cell line) were grown as a monolayer (2D) or in a collagen-matrix (3D) and exposed to Shiga-toxin (Stx) preparation or STEC cells that were pre-exposed to antibiotics (mitomycin C, ciprofloxacin, or polymyxin B) for toxin induction. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release from Vero cells was used as a biomarker for cytotoxicity. Modified tryptic soy broth (mTSB) as enrichment broth containing mitomycin C (2 &#x03BC;g/ml) or ciprofloxacin (100 ng/ml) significantly induced Stx production, which was further confirmed by the dot-immunoblot assay. The 3D Vero platform detected STEC after 6 h post-infection with cytotoxicity values ranging from 33 to 79%, which is considerably faster than the traditional 2D platform, when tested with STEC. The cytotoxicity for non-Stx producing bacteria, <italic>Salmonella</italic>, <italic>Listeria</italic>, <italic>Citrobacter</italic>, <italic>Serratia</italic>, and <italic>Hafnia</italic> was found to be below the cytotoxicity cutoff value of 15%. The detection limit for the 3D Vero cell assay was estimated to be 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/ml for bacteria and about 32 ng/ml for Stx in 6 h. STEC-inoculated ground beef samples (<italic>n</italic> = 27) resulted in 38&#x2013;46% cytotoxicity, and the bacterial isolates (<italic>n</italic> = 42) from ground beef samples were further confirmed to be <italic>stx1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic> positive in a multiplex PCR yielding a very low false-positive result. This 3D cell-based screening assay relies on mammalian cell pathogen interaction that can complement other molecular techniques for the detection of cell-free Stx or STEC cells from food samples for early detection and prevention.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Shiga-toxin producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC)</kwd>
<kwd>cytotoxicity</kwd>
<kwd>Vero cells</kwd>
<kwd>3D</kwd>
<kwd>food ground beef</kwd>
<kwd>multiplex-PCR</kwd>
<kwd>pathogen detection</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">59-8072-6-001</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">U.S. Department of Agriculture<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000199</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="76"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Shiga-toxin (Stx) producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC) is of major public health concern and is one of the top five foodborne pathogens responsible for a high number of hospitalizations in the United States each year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Scallan et al., 2011</xref>). STEC comprises more than 200 serotypes and is Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming bacteria that live in the intestinal tract of animals, contaminated soil and surface waters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mathusa et al., 2010</xref>). However, most do not cause serious illness unless it carries the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement (LEE) Pathogenicity Island that contains <italic>eae</italic> and genes for the Type III secretion system (T3SS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhunia, 2018</xref>). Under severe cases, the infection can progress and lead to hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Although some LEE-negative STEC strains can still cause illness, all outbreak strains that are highly associated to HUS are predominantly LEE positive strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hughes et al., 2006</xref>). The major serotypes of concern are O157, O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145, which were responsible for several foodborne outbreaks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Martineau et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Grant et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Farrokh et al., 2013</xref>). The O157 STEC can be distinguished from other serovars based on their ability to ferment sorbitol. Sorbitol-positive species can either be O157:NM, non-O157 STEC, or non-STEC, and the sorbitol-negative species are O157 STEC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">CDC, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Pollock et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Parsons et al., 2016</xref>). STEC can produce two types of Stx, Stx1, and Stx2, which are further subdivided into, Stx1a, Stx1c, Stx1d, Stx2a, Stx2b, Stx2c, Stx2d, Stx2f, and Stx2g, where Stx2a and Stx2c are the most prevalent subtypes that have been associated with HUS in patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Sheoran et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhunia, 2018</xref>). Therefore, advanced technologies and methods should be exploited for rapid detection of STEC including emerging pathogens that express <italic>stx</italic> gene to reduce the risk of food contamination, prevent foodborne outbreaks, and alleviate financial burden in the food industry.</p>
<p>Although mortality is low, the consumption of food contaminated with STEC leads to high morbidity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Karmali et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">CDC, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Sperandio and Pacheco, 2012</xref>). Continuous efforts are being made to develop microbial pathogen and toxin detection platforms for improving food safety and diagnostic testing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Tokarskyy and Marshall, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bhunia, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Cho et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Tang et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang and Salazar, 2015</xref>). According to the FDA and USDA-FSIS, a zero-tolerance policy is enforced in the United States where raw commodity must be free of the seven serogroups (O26, O103, O45, O111, O121, O145, and O157:H7) before retail distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Babsa et al., 2015</xref>;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">FSIS, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Brusa et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Traditional culturing methods, although accurate, are tedious and lengthy. Further, the standardized methodology is only established for O157 serotype of STEC, limiting the ability to detect and quantify non-O157 STEC serotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">FDA, 2001</xref>). Biochemical and physiological characteristics can be used to differentiate STEC O157 from non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic>; however, such methods may not be able to distinguish non-O157 STEC from non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">FDA, 2001</xref>). Molecular assay tools such as PCR and immunoassays are widely used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Tate and Ward, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Medina et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Schrader et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Armstrong et al., 2018</xref>) but they may fail to differentiate viable from dead cells or active from inactive toxins. Moreover, these methods may have limited specificity due to the cross-reactivity of antibodies and performance may be hampered by inhibitors from complex food matrices. Mammalian cell-based assays have a unique advantage over other molecular techniques because of its ability to measure the physiological function and toxicity of the analyte (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Banerjee and Bhunia, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Banerjee et al., 2010</xref>). Furthermore, they may be suitable for rapid high throughput screening to rule out negative samples while positive samples can be examined by a confirmatory test, to achieve results in an hour to a day (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Banerjee and Bhunia, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bhunia, 2014</xref>). To improve stability, sensitivity, and physiological relevance of the cell-based assays, mammalian cells are generally embedded in the natural matrices such as collagen, gelatin, elastin, silk fibroin, chitosan, chitin, fibrin, fibrinogen or grown as spheroid as a three dimensional (3D) scaffold, which mimics <italic>in vivo</italic> tissue organization and behavior and is an attractive model to study pathogen, toxin and drug interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Edmondson et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Ravi et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Barrila et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The Vero cell assay is considered the gold standard for screening Stx-positive samples in 48&#x2013;72 h by examining the morphology of Vero cells under an inverted microscope (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Konowalchuk et al., 1977</xref>). The assay was modified by our group to rapidly detect and differentiate STEC from non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> relying on the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from Vero cells as a biomarker for cytotoxicity and detection was achieved in 12&#x2013;16 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Roberts et al., 2001</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Maldonado et al. (2005)</xref> used the same assay to evaluate the cytotoxicity profile of <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates from food and environmental sources. Later, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Qui&#x00F1;ones et al. (2009)</xref> modified the assay using a genetically modified Vero cell line with a destabilized variant (half-life, 2 h) of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (Vero-d2GFP) that could detect 100 pg/ml of Stx2 in 16 h. Infectious dose for Stx2a is reported to be 1&#x2013;2,000 ng and for Stx1a is about 400 ng (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Tesh et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Russo et al., 2014</xref>). Although the assay has a low detection limit, the detection time is comparable to the previously mentioned LDH release assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Roberts et al., 2001</xref>). Interestingly, commercial and newly developed cell-based assays only target Stx toxin, rather than STEC bacteria as the analyte. Furthermore, for best practice, a 6&#x2013;8 h work shift is typically desired by both the food industry and government agencies. Thus our goal was to modify the Vero cell assay platform for improved sensitivity and rapid detection within the desired work-shift hours for STEC bacteria.</p>
<p>In this study, besides Vero cells, we also evaluated THP-1 (human monocyte cell line) for cytotoxicity, where both cell lines were embedded in a collagen matrix in a three dimensional (3D) assay platform and optimized assay conditions such as antibiotic induction for toxin production for testing with artificially contaminated ground beef samples. Samples were further confirmed for the presence of STEC (and Stx) by using the traditional culturing method and a multiplex PCR targeting <italic>stx1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic>. Overall, results support the potential application of 3D Vero cell platform over the THP-1 platform for detection of STEC from food samples in 6 h after an initial enrichment step.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Vero Cells Are More Sensitive to Purified Stx Than THP-1 Cells in a 3D Platform</title>
<p>Initially, Vero cell monolayer (2D) and THP-1 cell suspensions in a 48-well tissue culture plate were tested for their sensitivity to purified Stx (1 &#x03BC;g/ml) after 16 h of exposure. In 2D setup, THP-1 cells showed significantly higher sensitivity to purified commercial Stx toxin subtypes than the Vero cells, and the corresponding Trypan blue stained microscopic cell images confirmed cell death characterized by cell rounding, detachment, and dye uptake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A,B</xref>). Both cell lines were then embedded in collagen matrix using rat-tail collagen type I in a 48-well plate as before to create a 3D cell structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Banerjee et al., 2008</xref>) and tested against purified Stx preparations. Data show that the 3D Vero cells were more sensitive to Stx than the 3D THP-1 cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A,B</xref>). In contrast, 2D THP-1 is more sensitive to Stx than the 2D Vero (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A,B</xref>). Next, we determined the limit of detection for each platform to purified toxins diluted serially and found that cytotoxicity response is concentration-dependent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">F</xref>). In both 2D Vero and 3D THP-1 assays, the detection limit was 0.5&#x2013;1 &#x03BC;g/ml and cytotoxicity values varied from 20 to 30% after 16 h exposure. While the 3D Vero and 2D THP-1 cell platforms detected the Stx subtypes as low as 62.5&#x2013;125 ng/ml. Collectively, these data indicate that the 3D Vero cell platform provides the best response to Stx thus was selected for further assay development.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Vero cells are more sensitive to purified Stx than THP-1 cells in a 3D platform. Comparison of sensitivity against <bold>(A)</bold> commercial Stx1a, Stx2a, and Stx2c toxins at 1,000 ng/&#x03BC;l against 2D and 3D Vero and THP-1 cells after 16 h. <bold>(B)</bold> Visual examination of Vero and THP-1 cells using Trypan blue staining captured at 400&#x00D7; after 16 h post-infection. Cytotoxicity response to different concentrations (31.25&#x2013;1,000 ng/&#x03BC;l) of commercial Stx1a, Stx2a, and Stx2c toxins to <bold>(C)</bold> 2D Vero, <bold>(D)</bold> 2D THP-1, <bold>(E)</bold> 3D Vero, and <bold>(F)</bold> 3D THP-1. Cell-free supernatant from <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> strain (O157:H12 strain 489) was used as a negative control. Due to the limitation of resources, Stx1a was not tested for 3D THP-1 cells.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-00949-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>The Sensitivity of 3D Vero Cell Platform to STEC Cells</title>
<p>Next, we tested the sensitivity of 2D and 3D Vero cell-platforms after exposure to <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> and <italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic> STEC cells after 16 h exposure at different cell concentrations. In both 2D and 3D platforms, a minimum of 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/ml STEC was required to yield a positive response (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">D</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The cytotoxic response from the 3D Vero platform (38 &#x00B1; 7%, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) was significantly higher (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) than the 2D Vero platform (26 &#x00B1; 2%) after exposure to 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/ml of STEC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">C</xref>). Exposure to a higher concentration of STEC (10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) induced significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) higher levels of cytotoxic response (72 &#x00B1; 2 vs. 76 &#x00B1; 4%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). Cytotoxicity values of <italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic> strain (489) tested in either 2D or 3D platform (0&#x2013;5 &#x00B1; 1%) were significantly lower than the <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (204P) strain (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Microscopic images of Trypan blue stained Vero cells confirmed cytotoxicity response of STEC cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>). Furthermore, an increase in the concentration of STEC exposure increased dye uptake and cell rounding and cell damage.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>3D Vero cell platform is specific for STEC cells. Analysis of cytotoxicity of <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (O157:H7 strain 204P) and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> (O157:H12 strain 489) in <bold>(A)</bold> 2D Vero and <bold>(B)</bold> 3D Vero, and <bold>(C)</bold> 2D vs. 3D Vero cell assay. <bold>(D)</bold> Microscopic images showing the cytotoxicity effect of increasing concentrations of <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (204P) and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> (489) <italic>E. coli</italic> cells at 16 h under 400&#x00D7; magnification. <bold>(E)</bold> Cytotoxicity effect of <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (204P) and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> (489) <italic>E. coli</italic> cells (1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) at 4, 6, and 16 h using 2D and 3D Vero cells and corresponding <bold>(F)</bold> light microscopic images under 400&#x00D7; magnification.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-00949-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Bacterial cell populations in mTSB (USDA enrichment) after 15 h of growth.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Culture</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Strain<sup>a</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Serotype</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">PCR<sup>b</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Cell density<sup>c</sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">489</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.00 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 7.48 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">490</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.83 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 1.24 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">467</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O5:NM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.90 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 3.67 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O111:H8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.00 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 5.35 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O26:H11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.03 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup>&#x00B1; 6.18 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEA13A72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.77 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 1.11 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">488</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:NM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.07 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>&#x00B1; 1.81 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O91:H21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.57 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 4.50 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">B1409-C1P</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.14 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 1.52 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">B1409-C1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.37 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 5.14 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">505B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.90 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 5.10 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">204P</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.57 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 1.15 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">EDL933</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.30 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 7.26 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O111:H8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.63 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 1.08 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">OR:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.77 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 5.31 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O103:H11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.37 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup>&#x00B1; 9.74 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O45:H2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.97 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup>&#x00B1; 4.19 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O121:H19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.46 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 2.86 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O145:NM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>stx1/2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.02 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>&#x00B1; 6.98 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Salmonella enterica</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13ENT512</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Heidelberg</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>&#x00B1; 4.92 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Kentucky</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>&#x00B1; 2.49 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Tennessee</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.80 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>&#x00B1; 3.74 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F4244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Listeria innocua</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F4248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Citrobacter freundii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43864</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.37 &#x00D7; 10<sup>1</sup>&#x00B1; 6.34 &#x00D7; 10<sup>2</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.37 &#x00D7; 10<sup>1</sup>&#x00B1; 1.09 &#x00D7; 10<sup>1</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Serratia marcescens</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.20 &#x00D7; 10<sup>3</sup>&#x00B1; 2.16 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43862</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.60 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup>&#x00B1; 7.79 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Hafnia alvei</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.37 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup>&#x00B1; 5.25 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup><italic>a</italic></sup>Strains were obtained from Auburn University, Food and Drug Administration, Agri-Food Canada, Center for Disease Control and Prevention and American Type Culture Collection, Dr. Pina Fratamico, and form our culture collection. <sup><italic>b</italic></sup><italic>st</italic>x<italic>1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic> gene-based multiplex PCR was performed with initial denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 2 min, denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 1 min, annealing at 57&#x00B0;C for 1 min, and elongation at 72&#x00B0;C for 35 s. <sup><italic>c</italic></sup>Isolates were plated on SMAC to enumerate bacterial cell density. NA, not available. NT, not tested. NG, no growth. &#x2013;, negative for stx1 or stx2.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Next, we determined an optimal time required to show a definite difference in cytotoxicity between <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (204P) and <italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic> (489) strains. At 2 h, there was no difference, while at 6 and 16 h post-infection (hpi), cytotoxicity values were found to be significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) different between <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> and <italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic> strains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2E</xref>). Furthermore, the 3D Vero showed a higher response than the 2D Vero toward <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> strain and consequent microscopic images confirmed this observation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2F</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>3D Vero Cell Platform Is Specific for STEC Cells</title>
<p>We verified the sensitivity of the 3D Vero cell platform to 27 STEC and non-STEC strains at 2, 6, and 16 hpi. Data show that all STEC strains tested (including serovars O157, O26, O121, O103, O45, and O145) showed significantly higher cytotoxicity (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) than the non-STEC strains at 6 and 16 h while no discernable cytotoxicity response at 2 h (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Since no significant difference was observed among negative controls at each time point on a 2D or 3D platform (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), a cutoff value was determined by taking three standard deviations above the mean of all negative controls (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>), and the assay threshold is established to be 15% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Zhang et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Moodie et al., 2010</xref>). Microscopic images of Vero cells captured after infection with <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> STEC (204P) and non-STEC bacterial isolates (<italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> serovar Tennessee, <italic>Salmonella</italic> Heidelberg, <italic>Salmonella</italic> Kentucky, <italic>Listeria innocua</italic> F4248, <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> F4244, <italic>Citrobacter freundii</italic>, <italic>Serratia marcescens</italic>, <italic>Hafnia alvei</italic>, and non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> isolates) were in agreement with the cytotoxicity data (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Cytotoxicity assay of STEC and non-STEC bacteria.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Culture</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Isolate and serotype</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="6">Cytotoxicity (Abs<sub>490/680</sub>)<sup>a</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="6"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">2 h</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">6 h</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">16 h</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center">2D (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3D (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2D (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3D (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2D (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">3D (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="7"><bold>48-well plate assay</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Low control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(DMEM+LB)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">High control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74 &#x00B1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72 &#x00B1; 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69 &#x00B1; 0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69 &#x00B1; 0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.73 &#x00B1; 0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2% Triton X-100)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(100%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(100%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(100%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(100%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(100%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(100%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>E. coli</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">489 O157:H12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(10%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">490 O157:H19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12 &#x00B1; 0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(12%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(13%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">467 O5:NM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(33%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(61%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(67%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(75%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45 &#x00B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22 &#x00B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54 &#x00B1; 0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O111:H8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(30%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(62%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(26%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(72%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ3 O26:H11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54 &#x00B1; 0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(62%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(76%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(80%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(92%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEA13A72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32 &#x00B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(43%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(33%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(37%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(75%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">488 O157:NM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39 &#x00B1; 0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(15%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(51%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(53%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(47%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(52%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50 &#x00B1; 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O91:H21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(15%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(69%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(79%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(68%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(81%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">505B O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54 &#x00B1; 0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(49%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(77%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(79%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(85%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">204P O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(20%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(17%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(41%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(60%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(72%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(76%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">EDL933</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O157:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(15%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(32%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(39%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(62%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(66%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13 &#x00B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O111:H8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(13%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(41%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(57%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(46%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(84%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">HSC16 OR:H7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50 &#x00B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45 &#x00B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(5%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(70%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(63%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(60%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(73%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O103:H11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(9%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(37%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(59%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(63%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(91%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ9 O45:H2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46 &#x00B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(38%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(64%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(66%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(78%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O121:H19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(9%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(50%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(62%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(76%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(86%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SJ23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.33 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">O145:NM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(28%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(44%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(47%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(72%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Salmonella</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Heidelberg</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13ENT512</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Kentucky</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Tennessee</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Listeria</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F4244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>monocytogenes</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(12%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Listeria</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F4248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>innocua</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(8%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(11%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Citrobacter</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43864</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>freundii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(5%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(5%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Serratia</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11 &#x00B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>marcescens</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(10%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43862</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13 &#x00B1; 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(13%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(3%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Hafnia alvei</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06 &#x00B1; 0.003</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(2%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(0%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(1%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(7%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup><italic>a</italic></sup>Percent cytotoxicity was calculated using the formula: [(A<sub><italic>Exp</italic></sub> - A<sub><italic>LB control</italic></sub>)/(A<sub><italic>Triton X</italic></sub> - A<sub><italic>LB control</italic></sub>)] &#x00D7; 100 based on the amount of LDH released from negative control, positive control, and experimental samples; percent cytotoxicity is an average of three experiments displayed as means (&#x00B1;SD).</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Stx yield from <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> 204P 5 h after induction with UV, mitomycin C, ciprofloxacin, or polymyxin B.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Vol. (ml)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Un concentrated (total protein &#x03BC;g/ml)<sup>e</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Max. Stx yield</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">10 &#x00D7; concentrated (total protein &#x03BC;g/ml)<sup>e</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2">Max. Stx yield</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center">Stx1</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Stx2</th>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center">Stx1</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Stx2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">723 &#x00B1; 99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">996 &#x00B1; 317</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3814 &#x00B1; 82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3984 &#x00B1; 317</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.75 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">UV<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1010 &#x00B1; 119</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">215 &#x00B1; 7.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1533 &#x00B1; 42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">316 &#x00B1; 475</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1687 &#x00B1; 0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mitomycin C<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1766 &#x00B1; 87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.7 &#x00B1; 32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.3 &#x00B1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1915 &#x00B1; 10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">906 &#x00B1; 305</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3298 &#x00B1; 0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ciprofloxacin<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1826 &#x00B1; 35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">852 &#x00B1; 7.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.66 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2738 &#x00B1; 612</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1260 &#x00B1; 12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">314 &#x00B1; 0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Polymyxin B<sup>d</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3314 &#x00B1; 314</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3540 &#x00B1; 0.108</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">417 &#x00B1; 0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup><italic>a</italic></sup>UV lamp was placed 12 inches away from samples and treated at 115 V/68 Amps for 1 m before further incubation at 37&#x00B0;C for 5 h. <sup><italic>b</italic></sup>Mitomycin C (2 &#x03BC;g/ml) added to overnight cultures diluted 1:50 after 3 h incubation at 37&#x00B0;C before further incubation at 37&#x00B0;C for 5 h. <sup><italic>c</italic></sup>Ciprofloxacin (100 ng/ml) added to overnight cultures diluted 1:50 after 3 h incubation at 37&#x00B0;C before further incubation at 37&#x00B0;C for 5 h. <sup><italic>d</italic></sup>Polymyxin B (1 mg/ml) added to pellet from overnight culture and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 30 min. <sup>e</sup>Total protein quantified using BSA curve, <italic>y</italic> = 0.001069<italic>x</italic> + 0.05491.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Antibiotic Induction of STEC Increases the Sensitivity of 3D Vero Cell Platform</title>
<p>Our ultimate goal is to use an Stx-induction agent, such as antibiotics, together with the traditional bacterial enrichment broth before testing of food samples on a 3D cell-based assay platform without an intermediate sample-processing step. Antibiotics-induced Stx production has been reported before (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Yee et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Shimizu et al., 2003</xref>). Therefore, we wanted to examine the effect of several antibiotics, such as mitomycin C (2 &#x03BC;g/ml), ciprofloxacin (100 ng/ml), polymyxin B (2 mg/ml) and ultraviolet light (UV, exposure time 1.5 min) on Stx production and corresponding cytotoxicity on 2D and 3D Vero cell platforms. Data show that mitomycin C and UV induced the highest amount of Stx production than the ciprofloxacin or polymyxin B (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Toxin production was quantified in a dot blot immunoassay using anti-Stx1 and anti-Stx2 antibodies, and commercial Stx1 and Stx2 toxins as standards (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Mitomycin C and UV induced 316 &#x00B1; 475&#x2013;906 &#x00B1; 305 &#x03BC;g/ml Stx1 and 1687 &#x00B1; 0.42&#x2013;3298 &#x00B1; 0.30 &#x03BC;g/ml Stx2, respectively. Ciprofloxacin induced 1,260 &#x00B1; 12 &#x03BC;g/ml Stx1 and 314 &#x00B1; 0.04 &#x03BC;g/ml Stx2 while polymyxin B induced undetectable levels of Stx1 and 417 &#x00B1; 0.06 &#x03BC;g/ml Stx2. The crude toxin preparations (10&#x00D7; concentrated or unconcentrated) were then tested against 2D and 3D Vero cell platforms, and both showed positive effects. Notably, the effect was significantly higher on 3D than the 2D Vero cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A,B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Antibiotic induction of STEC increases toxin production. <bold>(A)</bold> Twofold serial dilutions of commercial Stx1 and Stx2 obtained from Toxin Technologies (Sarasota, FL, United States) were used to establish toxin standard curves <bold>(B,C)</bold>, respectively. <bold>(D)</bold> Dot blot analysis of crude Stx1 and Stx2 protein concentrated from <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> strains (204P, EDL933, SEA13A72), and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> (489) 5 h after Stx induction using antibiotics or UV light. Commercial Stx1 was used as a control in some blots (see arrows).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-00949-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>The sensitivity of 3D Vero cell platform. Cytotoxicity response of toxin preparations (0 or 10&#x00D7; concentrated) from <italic>E. coli</italic> strain 204P (<italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup>) after antibiotic or UV induction on <bold>(A)</bold> 2D Vero and <bold>(B)</bold> 3D Vero after 16 h exposure. <bold>(C)</bold> Vero cells exposed to bacteria pre-induced with antibiotics: STEC and non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic> and <bold>(D)</bold> antibiotics alone: ciprofloxacin (Cipro), mitomycin C (MitC), and polymyxin B (Poly B) for 3 h and 16 h, respectively, at 37&#x00B0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>. <bold>(E)</bold> Cryo-SEM images of the collagen embedded Vero cells exposed to crude Stx preparation from mitomycin C induced <italic>E. coli</italic> strain 204P (O157:H7) incubated for 8 h.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-00949-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A 3-h pre-induction of <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> strains (EDL933 and 204P) with mitomycin C (2 &#x03BC;g/ml) yielded 65 &#x00B1; 4% and 81 &#x00B1; 8% cytotoxicity, respectively. A similar trend was observed for ciprofloxacin, achieving 60 &#x00B1; 11% and 71 &#x00B1; 15% cytotoxicity, respectively, for these two strains. For uninduced bacteria, exposure to the same isolates had cytotoxicity values of 62 &#x00B1; 9% and 76 &#x00B1; 7%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>). As expected, <italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic> strains (489 and 490) showed negligible cytotoxicity (3&#x2013;7 &#x00B1; 2%) with or without antibiotics. We also tested the cytotoxic effects of all antibiotics, if any, without the bacteria and only polymyxin B caused cytotoxicity on Vero cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images also showed cell damage induced by Stx preparation from 204P strain after mitomycin C induction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4E</xref>). Stx-induced cell damage is mostly characterized by porous honeycomb-like cell architecture. Collectively, these data indicate that mitomycin C, ciprofloxacin and the UV treatment induced Stx production, and the cell-free toxin preparation showed a significantly higher cytotoxic effect than the toxin preparation from the uninduced cells. However, differences in cytotoxicity were not significant for STEC cells with or without induction when tested against the 3D Vero cells; therefore, antibiotics were not used with our food sample testing experiment described below.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>STEC Detection From Inoculated Beef Samples Using 3D Vero Cell</title>
<p><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> 204P (<italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup>) and 489 (<italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic>) &#x2013; inoculated raw ground beef samples (3 samples &#x00D7; 9 technical replicates = 27), procured from local grocery stores were enriched in mTSB at 42&#x00B0;C for 15 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">FDA, 2001</xref>). An aliquot of the enriched food samples was centrifuged and resuspended in LB and then applied to 3D Vero cell platform and incubated for 6 h. Note, mTSB alone exhibited cytotoxic response against Vero, and thus this medium was replaced with LB before Vero assay (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). A 15-h enrichment time was previously determined to yield a cell concentration of at least 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/ml (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) required for positive cytotoxicity on the 3D Vero platform. The 3D Vero cell assay positively detected STEC form all artificially contaminated ground beef samples tested with cytotoxicity values varied from 36 to 61% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). Strain 489 (<italic>stx<sup>-</sup></italic>) served as a negative control for the assay and yielded 3&#x2013;7% cytotoxicity, which is significantly lower than the <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> samples (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Trypan blue staining of Vero cells confirmed dye uptake, cell rounding and characteristic cytotoxic effect, which was in good agreement with LDH-based cytotoxicity assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). The presence of STEC in the enrichment broth (mTSB) was re-confirmed after subculturing on SMAC plates and multiplex PCR analysis of colonies for the presence of <italic>stx1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic> genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5C</xref>). These data clearly indicate that the 3D Vero cell platform is suitable for the detection of STEC cells from raw ground beef samples.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Detection of STEC from inoculated ground beef samples using 3D Vero. <bold>(A)</bold> Percent cytotoxicity induced by STEC from inoculated ground beef samples (<italic>n</italic> = 3 &#x00D7; 9 = 27) on 3D Vero. <bold>(B)</bold> Trypan blue staining of treated Vero cells shows cell rounding and membrane damage after exposure to ground beef spiked with strain 204P (<italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup>) but not with 489 (<italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup>). Plating on SMAC plate <bold>(B)</bold> and PCR <bold>(C)</bold> confirmed the presence of STEC cells and <italic>stx1</italic> (348 bp) and <italic>stx2</italic> genes (587 bp), respectively, from inoculated ground beef samples.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-00949-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates the application of the 3D Vero cell platform for rapid and sensitive detection and screening of Shiga-toxin producing <italic>E. coli</italic> from non-STEC bacteria in food samples. We employed the 3D Vero cell platform, which was able to detect both STEC cells and cell-free toxins in 6 h. This 3D Vero cell platform showed a cytotoxic response only to STEC cells or Stx preparations but no response to non-STEC cells. In this study, the Vero cell culturing in 3D platform, and toxin induction approach helped improve the assay sensitivity thereby reducing the detection time to about 6 h, which is a significant improvement over previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Konowalchuk et al., 1977</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Roberts et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Qui&#x00F1;ones et al., 2009</xref>). We found that the Vero cells in the 3D platform are more sensitive to STEC than the 2D setup. This may be primarily attributed to the 3D scaffold mimicking tissues in the body by maintaining cell polarity thus providing greater access of Vero cell surface receptors to pathogens and toxins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Ravi et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Barrila et al., 2018</xref>). Furthermore, the collagen embedding provides stable support for Vero cells during testing of food samples without any possibility of loss of cells, which can happen when the cells are grown in 2D monolayers. Additionally, collagen&#x2019;s strong gelling properties can act as a protective barrier to enhance the viability of cells and eliminate the risk of tampering during field-deployment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Banerjee et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Parenteau-Bareil et al., 2010</xref>). Previously, a similar 3D cell culture system using Ped-2E9 hybridoma B cells significantly improved toxin detection from <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic>, and <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Banerjee et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Banerjee and Bhunia, 2010</xref>). Overall, a 6 h 3D Vero cell-based assay is more competitive than the previously modified 2D Vero cell-based assay (12&#x2013;16 h) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Roberts et al., 2001</xref>), and compatible with immunoassays (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Tokarskyy and Marshall, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Il-Hoon et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Armstrong et al., 2018</xref>), PCR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cui et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Amani et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Parsons et al., 2016</xref>), and light scattering sensor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Tang et al., 2014</xref>), thus provides an attractive alternative approach for the screening of food samples for the presence of STEC.</p>
<p>Antibiotics or phage induction methods are typically used to induce or release Stx from STEC bacteria either to improve Stx yield for pathogenesis studies or to improve sensitivity for detection assays (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Griffin and Gemski, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Yee et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Zhang et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Laing et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Armstrong et al., 2018</xref>). As Stx prophages tightly regulate Stx production and release, activation of the SOS response gene, <italic>recA</italic>, must occur to express downstream <italic>stx1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic> genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Tyler et al., 2013</xref>). DNA damaging agents such as mitomycin C and ciprofloxacin that inhibit DNA synthesis or topoisomerase I, respectively, can induce bacterial SOS response and induce Stx production. Therefore, mitomycin C, ciprofloxacin, and polymyxin B were used at recommended concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Roberts et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Shimizu et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aertsen et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Maldonado et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al., 2016</xref>). Interestingly, Vero cells showed a strong cytotoxic response to polymyxin B (1 mg/ml) in absence of bacterial toxins. Polymyxin B mediated cytotoxic event is attributed to the interaction of polymyxin B with the cytoplasmic membrane of mammalian cells while disrupting osmotic homeostasis and promotion of oxidative stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Neiva et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Vattimo et al., 2016</xref>) thus, polymyxin B was not used in subsequent experiments. Furthermore, STEC pre-induced with mitomycin C and ciprofloxacin for 3 h did not improve the sensitivity of Vero cells to STEC suggesting that antibiotics may not be necessary for the development of 3D Vero assay for detection of STEC cells from food samples. STEC pathogenesis is multifactorial involving bacterial intimate attachment and production of attachment effacement lesion, which is substantiated by upregulation of genes in LEE, activation of T3SS, and Stx production for a cytotoxic response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sch&#x00FC;ller, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Tran et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Licznerska et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhunia, 2018</xref>). This may explain why Stx-mediated additive cytotoxic response after antibiotic induction was not seen when used with the STEC cells. However, mitomycin C and ciprofloxacin induction may yield a higher Stx amount during toxin preparation and for enhanced cytotoxicity response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Yee et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sch&#x00FC;ller, 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>An enrichment step is essential for food testing as it ensures full recovery and increased bacterial numbers without running the risk of generating false negatives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Sharpe, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bhunia, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Vetter, 2016</xref>). Although the detection limit of 3D Vero cell is high, requiring at least 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/ml, a 15-h enrichment in mTSB should be able to achieve 10<sup>7-8</sup> CFU/ml in the test sample with a very low (&#x003C;100 CFU/25 g) initial inoculum for reliable detection of STEC from food samples. This enrichment step for sample preparation is required for most, if not all detection assays including immunoassay and PCR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gould et al., 2009</xref>). It is well documented that PCR and immunoassays have superior sensitivity in detecting STEC (10 CFU/ml) and Stx (0.5 ng/ml) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Il-Hoon et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gehring et al., 2017</xref>); however, there are also drawbacks in detection time, sample and reagent preparation, and information provided about functional activity of Stx and viability of STEC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pimbley and Patel, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cui et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Banerjee et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Amani et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Zeng et al., 2016</xref>). Vero cell assay can also detect picogram quantities of Stx, however, detection time must be extended to 24&#x2013;72 h to acquire confirmatory results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hughes et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Rasooly and Do, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lentz et al., 2011</xref>). We verified that the detection time plays a role in the sensitivity of the assay using commercial Stx1 and Stx2 toxins preparations. Additionally, crude Stx sample preparation with the lengthy isolation, enrichment, and concentration methods makes it cumbersome to be used as an analyte for routine rapid detection.</p>
<p>To overcome the burden of sample and assay preparation with a faster sampling and detection time, 3D Vero cell system has been validated with inoculated ground beef samples for successful detection of viable STEC cells in 6 h after an enrichment step. In the 3D Vero cell assay, LDH release from toxin-induced cell death was measured as an indicator for cytotoxicity. However, this enzyme is found in animal tissues (meat), so interference from ground beef samples before inoculation with STEC or non-STEC cells must be calculated to correct for final values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Collins et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">&#x0160;alplachta and Ne&#x010D;as, 2000</xref>). Therefore, appropriate controls must be included every sampling time while using the 3D Vero platform. Furthermore, <italic>Salmonella, Listeria</italic>, <italic>Citrobacter</italic>, <italic>Serratia</italic>, <italic>Hafnia</italic>, and non-pathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> following a 15-h enrichment in mTSB did not yield positive cytotoxicity results, confirming the specificity of 3D Vero to detect STEC. Additionally, the purpose of using non-pathogenic <italic>E. coli</italic>, untreated mammalian cells, enrichment media, and antibiotics as negative controls throughout the study is to evaluate the level of interference that could affect the performance of the assay. With a low interference level, which allowed us to establish a 15% cutoff value, reduce the risk of achieving false positive results.</p>
<p>In summary, we demonstrated that the 3D Vero cell-based assay could be used for rapid detection of STEC by measuring LDH release. During method development, sample preparation time was shortened by using a bacterial analyte rather than a toxin analyte where the use of antibiotics can be eliminated in the enrichment step. Antibiotic-uninduced STEC resuspended in LB exhibited desirable cytotoxicity levels (26&#x2013;81%) that is above the 15% threshold after 6 h post-infection of the 3D Vero cell. Concentrated culture filtrates after mitomycin C induction also induced comparable levels of cytotoxicity, which was validated with dot immunoblotting showing high Stx2 yield (3.2-fold). Despite the high Stx1 production from ciprofloxacin induction (1.4-fold), low Stx2 yield was achieved. Mitomycin C was chosen for further studies due to the level of importance of Stx2 in STEC infection and its association with HUS. When compared to control cells, Vero cell morphology was profoundly altered in response to viable STEC cells and active Stx observed after Trypan blue staining and Cryo-SEM. Vero cells in either 2D or 3D configuration can detect up to 10<sup>7-8</sup> CFU/ml or 1,000 ng/ml (2D) and 31.25 ng/ml (3D) of Stx in 6 h, respectively. THP-1 cells did not exhibit a strong positive signal against STEC cells as compared to the Vero cells but can detect up to 125 ng/ml of Stx and 31.25 ng/ml of Stx in a 2D and 3D configurations, respectively. Since 3D Vero cells performed the best in response to both STEC cells and crude Stx, the 3D Vero platform was successfully used for the screening and detection of STEC cells from artificially contaminated ground beef samples in 6 h, which is faster than the traditional gold standard Vero cell assay which takes about 72-h. This method provides an opportunity to screen for emerging STEC serotypes with similar cytotoxicity potential. Therefore, this method for screening viable STEC has the potential to be adopted by the public health and/or food industry sectors for the screening of STEC from various samples to prevent future occurrence of STEC related foodborne outbreaks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Bacterial Cultures and Growth Media</title>
<p>Frozen stock cultures (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) were grown in BHI (Brain Heart Infusion) broth and then maintained on BHI agar (BHI, Becton Dickinson) plate for 1 month at 4&#x00B0;C. For fresh cultures, isolated colonies were inoculated into modified tryptone soy broth (mTSB) containing 0.15% bile salt, 0.4% dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, and 0.25% glucose (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, United States) at 42&#x00B0;C for 15 h with shaking at 120 rpm. Bacteria were also grown in Luria Bertani (LB) broth (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl), and EC broth (Becton Dickinson). To confirm and verify cultures, isolates were streaked on Modified Oxford Agar (MOX, Neogen, Lansing, MI, United States), Xylose Lysine Tergitol 4 (XLT4, Becton Dickinson), Sorbitol McConkey Agar (SMAC, Becton Dickinson) and RAPID&#x2019;Enterobacteriaceae Medium (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Mammalian 2D and 3D Cell Culture</title>
<p>African green monkey kidney (Vero) cell line (ATCC CCL-81) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collections (ATCC) and maintained in Dulbecco&#x2019;s modified Eagles medium (DMEM) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, United States) with 10% fetal bovine serum. For all cytotoxicity assays, 3.2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup> Vero or undifferentiated THP-1 (human monocyte cell line, ATCC) cells were grown as monolayers (2D) or suspensions (2D), respectively, in 48 well plates at 37&#x00B0;C with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> under humidity for 24 h. Vero cell monolayers were trypsinized with 0.25% of trypsin (Sigma) as described by the vendor and cell counts were determined by Trypan blue (0.4%) staining (Sigma). For 3D cell culture, cell suspensions were centrifuged and about 3.2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup> Vero or undifferentiated THP-1 cells were embedded with collagen (0.7 mg/ml) containing 50 &#x03BC;l PBS, 113 &#x03BC;l collagen I, 2.5 &#x03BC;l NaOH, and 335 &#x03BC;l DMEM (Sigma) as described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Banerjee et al., 2008</xref>) in 48 well plates (Corning). DMEM or RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added after a 30-min incubation at 37&#x00B0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub> to allow for complete gelation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Cytotoxicity Assay</title>
<p>Lactate dehydrogenase release was measured as described before (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Roberts et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Maldonado et al., 2005</xref>). THP-1 suspension cells were centrifuged (1,800 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min), washed with serum-free RPMI and seeded at 3.2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup> cells in 48 well plates with an initial volume adjusted to 200 &#x03BC;l/well. Vero cell monolayers and Vero embedded cells were washed with serum-free DMEM before the addition of DMEM (200 &#x03BC;l/well). Cells were exposed to 300 &#x03BC;l of STEC cells (&#x223C;10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) for 2 to 16 h or serial dilutions of crude or commercial Stx1a, Stx2a, and Stx2c toxins (Toxin Technologies, Sarasota, FL, United States or BEI Resources, Manassas, VA, United States) for 16 h. Vero or THP-1 cell supernatants were collected after centrifugation (1,800 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min) and loaded onto a sterile 96 well plate. Samples (50 &#x03BC;l) were mixed with LDH reaction reagent (50 &#x03BC;l) containing diaphorase, NAD<sup>+</sup>, sodium lactate, and iodophenyl-nitrophenyl-phenyltetrazolium chloride (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, United States). Plates were incubated for 15&#x2013;20 min in the dark at room temperature before taking measurements at absorbance 490/680 nm for LDH release using a microplate reader (Epoch, BioTek, Winooski, VT, United States). High controls treated with Triton X-100 (2%) for 45 min and low controls treated with serum-free DMEM+LB were used to calculate the percent cytotoxicity. Crude toxin preparations, STEC cells (204P) or commercial Stx toxins were used as positive controls for all LDH assays while cell-free supernatant or cells from <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> strain (O157:H12 strain 489) were used as negative control. To visualize cytopathic effect from treatments, cells were fixed with formaldehyde (4% in PBS, Sigma) and stained with Trypan blue (4%, 1:2 dilution, Corning, Waltham, MA, United States) solution for 3 min. Images were captured at 400&#x00D7; magnification using an Olympus Inverted Microscope.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Effect of Growth Media on Cytotoxicity</title>
<p>Four different growth media were evaluated to test for potential interference with the assay. Three hundred microliters of each LB broth, EC broth, and DMEM were added to 200 &#x03BC;l of DMEM before exposure to Vero cells and incubated for 16 h at 37&#x00B0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>. LDH assay of cell supernatants was performed as above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Stx Induction by Antibiotics and UV</title>
<p>For antibiotic induction, Vero cells were exposed to 500 &#x03BC;l of DMEM containing polymyxin B (50 &#x03BC;g/ml, Sigma), mitomycin C (24 ng/ml, Sigma), or ciprofloxacin (1.2 ng/ml, Sigma) for 16 h at 37&#x00B0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>. To verify the activity of antibiotics, Vero cell supernatants were tested against EDL933 (10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) on BHI. Since polymyxin B can potentially interfere with the assay and can give a high background signal, mitomycin C and ciprofloxacin were used for further experiments. Since LB and DMEM had the least cytotoxicity response, these two media were then used as resuspension media to evaluate cytotoxicity response of <italic>stx</italic>+ positive and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> samples after a 3 h pre-induction with mitomycin C (2 &#x03BC;g/ml) and ciprofloxacin (100 ng/ml) at 37&#x00B0;C with shaking at 120 rpm. All samples were analyzed for LDH release after 16 h as described above. Vero cells were imaged under light microscopy (Olympus) at 400&#x00D7; magnification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Cell-Free Toxin Preparations</title>
<p>Crude toxins were prepared from <italic>stx</italic>+ O157:H7 strains (204P, EDL933, SEA13A72), O5:NM (467), and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> O157:H12 strain 489. Bacteria were grown in mTSB at 37&#x00B0;C for 15 h with shaking at 120 rpm. An aliquot of each culture was centrifuged and re-suspended to a final volume of 300 &#x03BC;l in LB to reach a concentration of 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml and used immediately for LDH assay as above.</p>
<p>Overnight cultures were diluted to 1:50 in 50 ml LB and incubated for 3 h at 37&#x00B0;C with shaking at 120 rpm before the addition of mitomycin C (2 &#x03BC;g/ml) or ciprofloxacin (100 &#x03BC;g/ml, Sigma). For UV light treatment, overnight cultures were pelleted at 10,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min, resuspended in LB, and dispensed into a sterile petri dish which was placed under a UV lamp (115 V, 68 Amps, UVP, Upland, CA, United States) for 1 min maintaining a distance of 12 inches between the lamp and sample. All cultures were further incubated for 5 h at 37&#x00B0;C with shaking at 120 rpm before collecting supernatant after centrifugation at 10,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min. For polymyxin B treatment, 50 ml overnight culture was pelleted, re-suspended in 500 &#x03BC;l of PBS, supplemented with polymyxin (1 mg/ml), and further incubated for 30 min before collecting supernatant after centrifugation at 10,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min. Pellets from all treatments were incubated with 100 &#x03BC;l of chloroform at room temperature for 30 min to improve Stx release and toxin yield. Cell-free supernatants of all treatments were concentrated to about 3&#x2013;5 ml (about 10-fold concentrated) using Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Units using a 50 kDa cut-off cellulose membrane at 5,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 15 min (Millipore Sigma, Billerica, MA, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Dot Blot Analysis</title>
<p>Nitrocellulose membranes (0.2 &#x03BC;m, Biotrace NT, Thermo Scientific, Rochester, NY, United States) were pre-wetted in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% tween 20 (TBST) for 1 min and placed in Bio-Dot apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States) under vacuum. Twofold diluted crude toxin samples and commercial Stx standards (Toxin Technologies, Sarasota, FL, United States, or BEI Resources, Manassas, VA, United States) were loaded into each well and application of gentle vacuum allowed fluid passage through the membrane. Membranes were washed with 100 &#x03BC;l of TBST/well, blocked with TBST containing 5% non-fat dry milk (NFDM), and incubated at room temperature for 45 min. Membranes were then washed with TBST three times at room temperature for 3 min with gentle agitation. Primary antibody solution containing antibody to Stx1-1 or Stx2-5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Skinner et al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al., 2016</xref>) at dilutions 1:1000 in TBST with 5% NFDM was added to blots and allowed to incubate overnight at 4&#x00B0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Evaluation of Cytotoxicity Response From 2D and 3D Vero Cell</title>
<p>Twenty-seven bacterial isolates were screened for cytotoxicity potential after a 15 h enrichment in mTSB at 42&#x00B0;C with shaking. Vero cells (2D and 3D) were washed with serum-free DMEM (SF-DMEM) before exposure to bacteria (300 &#x03BC;l &#x2248; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml). The total volume of wells was adjusted to 500 &#x03BC;l with SF-DMEM before incubation at 37&#x00B0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>. To determine the limit of detection of the assay, overnight cultures of <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (204P) and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> (489) were resuspended in LB and serial dilutions of bacterial preparations were added to Vero cells and incubated for 16 h at 37&#x00B0;C in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>. To determine optimal detection time, Vero cell cytotoxicity was assayed after exposure to <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> (204P) and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> (489) at 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml) for 2 h, 6 h, and 16 h. <italic>Salmonella</italic>, <italic>Listeria</italic> spp., <italic>Citrobacter</italic>, <italic>Hafnia</italic>, and <italic>Serratia</italic> spp. were also tested to investigate assay specificity. All samples were centrifuged at 1,800 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min and assayed for LDH. LDH values were acquired from three independent sets of experiments and analyzed in duplicates. After LDH analysis, cells were fixed with formaldehyde (4%) before Trypan blue (4%, 1:2 dilution) staining for 3 min to determine Vero cell morphology after treatments at 400&#x00D7; magnification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Cryo-SEM of Vero Cells in 3D Matrix</title>
<p>Minimally dehydrated collagen gel embedded Vero cells were mounted on slotted Gatan holders with 1 mm of the sample above the holder. Samples were cryo-transferred after plunge freezing with nitrogen slush into the Gatan preparation chamber, which is held under high vacuum. Frozen samples were fractured with a cold scalpel in the Gatan Alto 2500 preparation chamber at -185&#x00B0;C (Pleasanton, CA, United States) before being transferred into the SEM chamber. Samples were mounted on the cryo-stage set for -90&#x00B0;C sublimation and imaged until a structure was observed before sputter coating for 120 s using a platinum target at -185&#x00B0;C. SEM Cryo-stage was lowered to -140&#x00B0;C during sputter coating and was reinserted onto the NovaNano SEM cryo-stage before capturing final images of fractured surfaces. An accelerating voltage of 5 kV and spot size 3 with a working distance of approximately 5 mm at magnifications ranging &#x00D7;1,000 and &#x00D7;10,000 were used in the NovaNano SEM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>STEC Detection From Artificially Contaminated Ground Beef Using 3D Vero</title>
<p>3D Vero cell platform was used to screen and detect STEC from artificially contaminated ground beef samples. Three brands of ground beef (5 lb each), purchased from local grocery stores, were artificially inoculated with <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> 204P (O157:H7) and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> 489 (O157:H12) strain under aseptic conditions. Samples were processed following the USDA guidelines for screening STEC in ground beef samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">FSIS, 2016</xref>). In brief, ground beef samples (32 &#x00B1; 3.2 g each, 3 samples &#x00D7; 9 technical replicates = 27) were placed in sterile strainer bags (Seward, Islandia, NY, United States) inoculated with 100 &#x03BC;l of 204P (6.7 &#x00D7; 10<sup>2</sup> &#x00B1; 2.1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/ml) and 489 (7.4 &#x00D7; 10<sup>2</sup> &#x00B1; 5.9 &#x00D7; 10<sup>2</sup> CFU/ml). Samples were then diluted with 97 &#x00B1; 1.9 ml of mTSB and hand massaged for 1 min to homogenize before incubating at 42&#x00B0;C for 15 h with shaking at 120 rpm. To determine a final cell density after enrichment, samples were serially diluted (1:10 in PBS) and plated on SMAC plates and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 24 h. For 3D Vero cell assay, 300 &#x03BC;l samples were centrifuged at 10,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min and resuspended in the same volume of LB before exposure to 2D or 3D Vero cells (3.2 &#x00D7; 10<sup>4</sup> cells) in a 48-well plate format. After incubation at 37&#x00B0;C for 6 h in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, samples were centrifuged at 1,800 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 3 min and analyzed for LDH release. Uninoculated meat samples were also tested to check for background response and interference. Suspected colonies identified on the SMAC were confirmed by PCR, targeting <italic>stx1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic> genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>DNA Extraction and Multiplex PCR</title>
<p>DNA templates were extracted following a boiling and colony PCR method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Feng et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hoang Minh et al., 2015</xref>). Stx-specific primers targeting <italic>stx1</italic> (5&#x2032;-ATCCTATTCCCGGGAGTTTACG-3&#x2032; and 5&#x2032;-GCGT CATCGTATACACAGGAGC-3&#x2032;) and <italic>stx2</italic> (5&#x2032;-CACCAGACAATGTAACCGCTG-3&#x2032; and 5&#x2032;-TIACCATTTCAGTACCTTCTGGTAA-3&#x2032;) genes were used to confirm the Stx presence in the 3D Vero-identified STEC positive samples. DNA templates from non-STEC isolates, uninoculated meat samples, and water were used as negative controls. The reaction mixture (25 &#x03BC;l) contained 200 ng of DNA template, 1&#x00D7; GoTaq Flexi buffer, 1 U of GoTaq, 2.5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 200 &#x03BC;M deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTP), and 4 &#x03BC;M of <italic>stx1</italic> and <italic>stx2</italic> forward and reverse primers. The PCR was carried out with an initial denaturation step at 94&#x00B0;C for 120 s, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 60 s, annealing at 57&#x00B0;C for 60 s, 72&#x00B0;C for 60 s and a final extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 35 s.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Values are presented as mean &#x00B1; SD. GraphPad Prism (version 6) software was used to perform ordinary one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s multiple comparisons analysis to evaluate whether there are a significant difference among media (LB, DMEM, EC, mTSB) and antibiotics (mitomycin C and ciprofloxacin) induced cytotoxicity response. ImageJ (NIH) was used to assess Stx yield after induction. SAS software was used to perform 2 &#x00D7; 2 &#x00D7; 3 ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis to assess the interaction between <italic>stx</italic><sup>+</sup> and <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup> strains, dimension (2D vs. 3D), and time of incubation (2 h, 6 h, and 16 h).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>AB conceived the idea. AB and CT designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. CT performed the experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, under Agreement No. 59-8072-6-001, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch accession no. 1016249) and the Center for Food Safety Engineering at Purdue University. Any opinions, findings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States Department of Agriculture.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>Tomasz Wilmanski is acknowledged for statistical analysis, Robert Seiler for technical assistance, Dr. Xiaohua He from Western Regional Research Center (USDA-ARS), Emeryville, CA, United States for providing Stx1-1 and Stx2-5 primary antibodies, Dr. Thomas Walter for providing UV lamp set up, BEI resources for providing purified Stx1a, Stx2a, and Stx2c standards, and Pratik Banerjee (University of Memphis) for critical review of the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00949/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00949/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="SM1" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S1</label>
<caption><p>Specificity assay. <bold>(A)</bold> Effect of growth media (DMEM, LB, EC, mTSB, <italic>stx</italic><sup>-</sup>) on Vero cytotoxicity. <bold>(B,C)</bold> Cytotoxicity of non-STEC bacteria on 3D Vero cells after 6 h exposure. <bold>(C)</bold> STEC strain EDL933 caused severe cell damage, cell rounding, and cell death visualized after Trypan blue staining while other pathogens (<italic>Salmonella</italic> Tennessee, <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic>, <italic>Serratia marcescens</italic>, <italic>Citrobacter freundii</italic>, <italic>Hafnia alvei</italic>, and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>) did not cause any damage during this period (magnification, 400&#x00D7;).</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aertsen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Houdt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michiels</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Construction and use of an stx1 transcriptional fusion to gfp.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>245</volume> <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15796982</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amani</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmadpour</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fooladi</surname> <given-names>A. A. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nazarian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Detection of <italic>E. coli O</italic>157: H7 and <italic>Shigella dysenteriae</italic> toxins in clinical samples by PCR-ELISA.</article-title> <source><italic>Braz. J. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>278</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>284</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjid.2015.02.008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25911087</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruth</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Capobianco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strobaugh</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rubio</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gehring</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Detection of Shiga toxin 2 produced by <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in foods using a novel AlphaLISA.</article-title> <source><italic>Toxins</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>422</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins10110422</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30360508</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Babsa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caprioli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiani</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferreri</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galati</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maugliani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source><italic>Report of the 15th Inter-Laboratory Study on the Detection of Verocytotoxin-Producing E. coli (VTEC) in sprouts (PT 15).</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Bethesda, MD</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Istituto Superiore di Sanit&#x00E0;</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Mammalian cell-based biosensors for pathogens and toxins.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19187988</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Cell-based biosensor for rapid screening of pathogens and toxins.</article-title> <source><italic>Biosens. Bioelectron.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.020</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20570502</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Mammalian Cell-Based Sensor System</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Whole Cell Sensing Systems I</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Belkin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/10_2009_21</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20091291</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kintzios</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prabhakarpandian</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Biotoxin detection using cell-based sensors.</article-title> <source><italic>Toxins</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>2366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins5122366</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24335754</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lenz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rickus</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A novel and simple cell-based detection system with a collagen-encapsulated B-lymphocyte cell line as a biosensor for rapid detection of pathogens and toxins.</article-title> <source><italic>Lab. Invest.</italic></source> <volume>88</volume> <fpage>196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/labinvest.3700703</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18059364</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barrila</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crabb&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franco</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nydam</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forsyth</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Modeling host-pathogen interactions in the context of the microenvironment: three-dimensional cell culture comes of age.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>86</volume>:<fpage>e282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.00282-18</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30181350</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>One day to one hour: how quickly can foodborne pathogens be detected?</article-title> <source><italic>Future Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>946</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/fmb.14.61</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25302952</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Escherichia coli</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Foodborne Microbial Pathogens: Mechanisms and Pathogenesis</italic></source>, <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer New York</publisher-name>), <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>269</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brusa</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Restovich</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galli</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teitelbaum</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Signorini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brasesco</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from beef carcasses, cuts and trimmings of abattoirs in Argentina.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<issue>e0183248</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0183248</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28829794</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>CDC</collab> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Importance of culture confirmation of Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> infection as illustrated by outbreaks of gastroenteritis&#x2013;New York and North Carolina, 2005.</article-title> <source><italic>MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>1042</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1045</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17008867</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>CDC</collab> (<year>2012</year>). <source><italic>National Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) surveillance overview.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Atlanta, GA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>I.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radadia</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farrokhzad</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ximenes</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bae</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Nano/Micro and spectroscopic approaches to food pathogen detection.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-anchem-071213-020249</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24896312</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keeton</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Lactate dehydrogenase activity in bovine muscle as a potential heating endpoint indicator.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Agri. Food Chem.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>1291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf00007a019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Rapid sample preparation method for PCR-based detection of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157: H7 in ground beef.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01951.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12807462</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edmondson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broglie</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adcock</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors.</article-title> <source><italic>Assay Drug Develop. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>218</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/adt.2014.573</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24831787</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farrokh</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Auvray</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glass</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oppegaard</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raynaud</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Review of Shiga-toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (STEC) and their significance in dairy production.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>162</volume> <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.08.008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22939912</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>FDA</collab> (<year>2001</year>). <source><italic>Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online, 8th ed.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Arlington, VA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weagant</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Enumeration of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and the coliform bacteria, chap. 4</article-title>&#x201D; in <source><italic>Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online</italic></source> (<publisher-loc>Gaithersburg, MD</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>FSIS</collab> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>Raw Beef Product Sampling.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>USDA Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS)</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gehring</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fratamico</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruth</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of ELISA tests specific for Shiga toxin 1 and 2 in food and water samples.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Control</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gould</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bopp</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strockbine</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Atkinson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baselski</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Body</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Recommendations for diagnosis of shiga toxin&#x2013;producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> infections by clinical laboratories.</article-title> <source><italic>MMWR Recomm. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedberg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logue</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The significance of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in food.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Prot. Trends</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gemski</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Release of Shiga toxin from <italic>Shigella dysenteriae</italic> 1 by polymyxin B.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>425</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>428</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoang Minh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kimura</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoang Minh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Honjoh</surname> <given-names>K. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miyamoto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Virulence characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from raw meats and clinical samples.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiol. Immunol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1348-0421.12235</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25644201</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stricklett</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kohan</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Cytotoxic effect of Shiga toxin-1 on human proximal tubule cells.</article-title> <source><italic>Kidney Int.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>426</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>437</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00015.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9690209</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thorpe</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sears</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The emerging clinical importance of non-O157 Shiga toxin&#x2014;producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>1587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1595</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Il-Hoon</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Irudayaraj</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Rapid pathogen detection by lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay with gold nanoparticle-assisted enzyme signal amplification.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>206</volume> <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.032</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25955290</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karmali</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gannon</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sargeant</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Verocytotoxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (VTEC).</article-title> <source><italic>Vet. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>140</volume> <fpage>360</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>370</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.04.011</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19410388</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Konowalchuk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Speirs</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stavric</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Vero response to a cytotoxin of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>779</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">338490</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Laing</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilmour</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A comparison of Shiga-toxin 2 bacteriophage from classical enterohemorrhagic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> serotypes and the German <italic>E. coli O</italic>104:H4 outbreak strain.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>e37362</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0037362</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22649523</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lentz</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leyva-Illades</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cherla</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tesh</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Differential response of the human renal proximal tubular epithelial cell line HK-2 to Shiga toxin types 1 and 2.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>79</volume> <fpage>3527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3540</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.05139-11</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21708996</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Licznerska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nejman-Fale&#x0144;czyk</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bloch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dydecka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Topka</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x0105;sior</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Oxidative stress in Shiga toxin production by enterohemorrhagic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.</italic></source> <volume>2016</volume>:<issue>3578368</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2016/3578368</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26798420</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maldonado</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fiser</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakatsu</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Cytotoxicity potential and genotypic characterization of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> isolates from environmental and food sources.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>71</volume> <fpage>1890</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1898</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.71.4.1890-1898.2005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15812017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martineau</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Picard</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paradis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ouellette</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Development of a PCR assay for identification of staphylococci at genus and species levels.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Clin. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>2541</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2547</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.39.7.2541-2547.2001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11427566</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mathusa</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enache</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hontz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in foods.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Food Prot.</italic></source> <volume>73</volume> <fpage>1721</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1736</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028x-73.9.1721</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20828483</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Medina</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shelver</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fratamico</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fortis</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tillman</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Narang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Latex agglutination assays for detection of non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Food Prot.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>819</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>826</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-430</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22564929</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moodie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gouttefangeas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mander</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janetzki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x00F6;wer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Response definition criteria for ELISPOT assays revisited.</article-title> <source><italic>Cancer Immunol. Immunother.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>1489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00262-010-0875-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20549207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neiva</surname> <given-names>L. B. D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>C. D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vattimo</surname> <given-names>M. D. F. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Polymyxin B: dose and time dependent nephrotoxicity effect in vitro.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Paul. Enferm.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parenteau-Bareil</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gauvin</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berthod</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications.</article-title> <source><italic>Materials</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>1863</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1887</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma3031863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parsons</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zelyas</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berenger</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chui</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Detection, characterization, and typing of Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>478</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00478</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27148176</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pimbley</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>A review of analytical methods for the detection of bacterial toxins.</article-title> <source><italic>Symp. Ser. Soc. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>98S</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109S</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.0840s198s.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pollock</surname> <given-names>K. G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Locking</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beattie</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maxwell</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramage</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Sorbitol-fermenting <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157. Scotland.</article-title> <source><italic>Emerg. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>881</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>882</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20409394</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qui&#x00F1;ones</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Massey</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friedman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swimley</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teter</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Novel cell-based method to detect Shiga toxin 2 from <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7 and inhibitors of toxin activity.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>1410</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1416</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02230-08</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19139230</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rasooly</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Do</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Shiga toxin Stx2 is heat-stable and not inactivated by pasteurization.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>136</volume> <fpage>290</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>294</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19875188</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ravi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaviya</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anuradha</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solomon</surname> <given-names>F. D. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>3D cell culture systems: advantages and applications.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Cell. Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>230</volume> <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcp.24683</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24912145</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garstka</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhunia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Lactate dehydrogenase release assay from Vero cells to distinguish verotoxin producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> from non-verotoxin producing strains.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Microbiol. Methods</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00222-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11118652</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Russo</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melton-Celsa</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;brien</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Oral intoxication of mice with Shiga toxin type 2a (Stx2a) and protection by anti-Stx2a monoclonal antibody 11E10.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>1213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1221</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.01264-13</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24379294</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x0160;alplachta</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ne&#x010D;as</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme pattern in tissues and serum of the calf.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Vet. Brno</italic></source> <volume>69</volume> <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2754/avb200069040267</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scallan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angulo</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tauxe</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Widdowson</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Foodborne illness acquired in the United States&#x2014;major pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Emerg. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid1701.09-1101p1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schrader</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schielke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellerbroek</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johne</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>PCR inhibitors&#x2013;occurrence, properties and removal.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>113</volume> <fpage>1014</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1026</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22747964</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sch&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Shiga toxin interaction with human intestinal epithelium.</article-title> <source><italic>Toxins</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>626</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>639</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins3060626</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22069729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharpe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <source><italic>Food Sample Preparation and Enrichment for Rapid Detection.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Ontario, ON</publisher-loc>: Special Publications-Royal Society of Chemistry.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheoran</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donohue-Rolfe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tzipori</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Stx2-specific human monoclonal antibodies protect mice against lethal infection with <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> expressing Stx2 variants.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>71</volume> <fpage>3125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/iai.71.6.3125-3130.2003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12761090</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asahara</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nomoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hamabata</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozawa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Development of a lethal Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>-infection mouse model using multiple mitomycin C treatment.</article-title> <source><italic>Microb. Pathog.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0882-4010(03)00065-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12860453</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skinner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patfield</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanker</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fratamico</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>New high-affinity monoclonal antibodies against Shiga toxin 1 facilitate the detection of hybrid Stx1/Stx2 in vivo.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e99854</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0099854</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24914553</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skinner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patfield</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>An in vitro combined antibiotic-antibody treatment eliminates toxicity from Shiga toxin-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>5435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5444</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.00763-15</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26100707</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sperandio</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pacheco</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Shiga Toxin in Enterohemorrhagic <italic>E.coli</italic>: regulation and novel antivirulence strategies.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>:<issue>81</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2012.00081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aroonnual</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bae</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajwa</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Light scattering sensor for direct identification of colonies of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145 and O157.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e105272</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0105272</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25136836</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tate</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Interferences in immunoassay.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Biochem. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tesh</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burris</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Owens</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wadolkowski</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;brien</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Comparison of the relative toxicities of Shiga-like toxins type I and type II for mice.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>61</volume> <fpage>3392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3402</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8335369</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tokarskyy</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Immunosensors for rapid detection of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7 &#x2013; Perspectives for use in the meat processing industry.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2007.07.005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17993371</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Billoud</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sch&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Shiga toxin production and translocation during microaerobic human colonic infection with Shiga toxin-producing <italic>E.?coli O</italic>157:H7 and O104:H4.</article-title> <source><italic>Cell. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>1255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cmi.12281</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24612002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tyler</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beeri</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alteri</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skinner</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Friedman</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Prophage induction is enhanced and required for renal disease and lethality in an EHEC mouse model.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Pathog.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e1003236</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1003236</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23555250</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vattimo</surname> <given-names>M. E. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Da Fonseca</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neiva</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pessoa</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borges</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Polymyxin B nephrotoxicity: from organ to cell damage.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>e0161057</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0161057</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27532263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vetter</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>Understanding Microbiological Sampling and Testing.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS)</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prinyawiwatkul</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Rapid and specific detection of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> serogroups O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157 in ground beef, beef trim, and produce by loop-mediated isothermal amplification.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>2727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2736</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.07975-11</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22327594</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hegde</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapur</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Rapid detection of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157 and Shiga toxins by lateral flow immunoassays.</article-title> <source><italic>Toxins</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>92</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins8040092</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27023604</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salazar</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Culture-independent rapid detection methods for bacterial pathogens and toxins in food matrices.</article-title> <source><italic>Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1541-4337.12175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yee</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Grandis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gyles</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Mitomycin-induced synthesis of a Shiga-like toxin from enteropathogenic <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> HI 8.</article-title> <source><italic>Infect. Immun.</italic></source> <volume>61</volume> <fpage>4510</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4513</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Advances and challenges in viability detection of foodborne pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>1833</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.01833</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27920757</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oldenburg</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biomol. Screening</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/108705719900400206</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10838414</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcdaniel</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keusch</surname> <given-names>G. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waldor</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Acheson</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Quinolone antibiotics induce Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages, toxin production, and death in mice.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Infect. Dis.</italic></source> <volume>181</volume> <fpage>664</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>670</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/315239</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10669353</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>