<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01043</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Effect of Previous Life Cycle Phase on the Growth Kinetics, Morphology, and Antibiotic Resistance of <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium DT104 in Brain Heart Infusion and Ground Chicken Extract</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hawkins</surname>
<given-names>Jabari L.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref rid="fn1" ref-type="author-notes">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/674453/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Uknalis</surname>
<given-names>Joseph</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oscar</surname>
<given-names>Tom P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schwarz</surname>
<given-names>Jurgen G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vimini</surname>
<given-names>Bob</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff4" ref-type="aff">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Parveen</surname>
<given-names>Salina</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp">
<sup>&#x002A;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/108419/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore</institution>, <addr-line>Princess Anne, MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Molecular Characterization of Foodborne Pathogens Research Unit, USDA/ARS, Eastern Regional Research Center</institution>, <addr-line>Wyndmoor, PA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Chemical Residue and Predictive Microbiology Research Unit, USDA/ARS, University of Maryland Eastern Shore</institution>, <addr-line>Princess Anne, MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Perdue Farms Inc.</institution>, <addr-line>Salisbury, MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn1" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Giovanna Suzzi, University of Teramo, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn2" fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Abhinav Mishra, University of Georgia, United States; Guillermo Tellez, University of Arkansas, United States</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Salina Parveen, <email>sparveen@umes.edu</email>
</corresp>
<fn id="fn4" fn-type="equal">
<p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>Present address: Jabari L. Hawkins, USDA FSIS, Washington, DC., United States</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn3" fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1043</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>31</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2019 Hawkins, Uknalis, Oscar, Schwarz, Vimini and Parveen.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Hawkins, Uknalis, Oscar, Schwarz, Vimini and Parveen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Growth models are predominately used in the food industry to estimate the potential growth of selected microorganisms under environmental conditions. The growth kinetics, cellular morphology, and antibiotic resistance were studied throughout the life cycle of <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium. The effect of the previous life cycle phase [late log phase (LLP), early stationary phase (ESP), late stationary phase (LSP), and early death phase (EDP)] of <italic>Salmonella</italic> after reinoculation in brain heart infusion broth (BHI), ground chicken extract (GCE), and BHI at pH&#x00A0;5, 7, and 9 and salt concentrations 2, 3, and 4% was investigated. The growth media and previous life cycle phase had significant effects on the lag time (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>), specific growth rate (<italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>), and maximum population density (<italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>). At 2 and 4% salt concentration, the LLP had the significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) fastest <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> (1.07 and 0.69 log CFU/ml/h, respectively). As the cells transitioned from the late log phase (LLP) to the early death phase (EDP), the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05</italic>) increased. At pH&#x00A0;5 and 9, the EDP had a significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) lower <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> than the LLP, ESP, and LSP. As the cells transitioned from a rod shape to a coccoid shape in the EDP, the cells were more susceptible to antibiotics. The cells regained their resistance as they transitioned back to a rod shape from the EDP to the log and stationary phase. Our results revealed that growth kinetics, cell&#x2019;s length, shape, and antibiotic resistance were significantly affected by the previous life cycle phase. The results of this study also demonstrate that the previous life cycle should be considered when developing growth models of foodborne pathogens to better ensure the safety of poultry and poultry products.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>pH</kwd>
<kwd>salt</kwd>
<kwd>water activity</kwd>
<kwd>microscopy</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Salmonella</italic></kwd>
<kwd>growth</kwd>
<kwd>modeling</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">U.S. Department of Education, Title III, USDA Evans Allen</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn2">Perdue Farms, Inc</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="47"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7513"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Salmonella</italic> is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, and non-spore forming bacterium. Salmonellosis, an infection caused by <italic>Salmonella</italic>, is one of the most common and widely encountered foodborne diseases, with tens of millions of human cases occurring worldwide annually (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">WHO, 2013</xref>). In the United&#x00A0;States, there is an estimated 1 million salmonellosis cases annually causing 19,000 hospitalizations and 380 deaths (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Scallan et&#x00A0;al., 2011</xref>). This has resulted in an increased interest to better understand the growth and changes of <italic>Salmonella</italic> under antibiotic and environmental stresses.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al. (2009)</xref> suggested that current food safety studies that base the effectiveness of interventions on the ability to reduce foodborne pathogens in the stationary phase may be overestimated. They found that <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> in the long-term stationary (LTS) phase has more resistance to thermal and high-pressure processing than in the stationary phase. As the availability of nutrients dissipated and <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> transitioned into the LTS phase, the morphology changed from a rod to a coccoid shape. The coccoid shape increased its survivability and resistance to treatments. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Wen et&#x00A0;al. (2013)</xref> also found that initial viable cell density (~10<sup>6</sup> to ~10<sup>10</sup>&#x00A0;CFU/ml) and pH (5.36&#x2013;6.85) of <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> affected the transition to the LTS phase.</p>
<p>Although many models exist for the growth of bacteria in model food systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Oscar, 1997</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">1999a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Mellefont et&#x00A0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Ross et&#x00A0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Parveen et&#x00A0;al., 2007</xref>), there is limited information about the regrowth of bacteria at previous life cycle phases such as lag, log, stationary, death, and long-term stationary (LTS) phase. The objective of this study was to investigate how the phase of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104 at the log, stationary, and death phase affects its transition back to the stationary phase. This study was conducted to observe the microbial behavior and the effect of previous life cycle phases at a constant temperature on the growth, cell morphology, and antibiotic resistance patterns of <italic>Salmonella</italic> in inoculated brain heart infusion broth and ground chicken extract.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Preparation of Bacterial Inoculum</title>
<p>A multiple-antibiotic resistant strain (ATCC 700408, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium definitive phage type 104 (DT104) was used in this study. This strain has an antibiotic resistance profile (chloramphenicol, ampicillin, tetracycline, and streptomycin) that is found in chicken isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Parveen et&#x00A0;al., 2007</xref>) and has been used in similar growth modeling studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Oscar, 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">2007</xref>). The stock culture of this strain was maintained at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) (BBL, Difco, BD, Sparks, MD) that contained 15% (vol/vol) glycerol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Previous Life Cycle Phase</title>
<p>A growth curve was developed to identify the life cycle phases of DT104 (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). One microliter of the stock culture was transferred into sterile BHI (5&#x00A0;ml) in a centrifuge tube (15 ml) followed by incubation at 37&#x00B0;C and 150&#x00A0;rpm from 0 to 770&#x00A0;h. This was carried out in three replicates and 50&#x00A0;&#x03BC;l of undiluted and appropriate 1:10 diluted (10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> to 10<sup>&#x2212;5</sup>) samples from cultures were spiral plated (Whitely Automated Spiral Plater, Microbiology International, Frederick, MD) onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates. The TSA plates were incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 24&#x00A0;h and then bacterial colonies were enumerated. In <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>, after the stationary phase, the culture had a slow and extended death phase. Since there is no time period of a stable density, it is referred to as the early death phase (EDP) instead of the LTS phase throughout the paper.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104&#x00A0;in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) at 37&#x00B0;C for different times to yield A (9&#x00A0;h, late log phase), B (24&#x00A0;h, early stationary&#x00A0;phase), C (48&#x00A0;h, late log phase), and D (720&#x00A0;h, early death phase).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Starter Culture</title>
<p>One microliter of the stock culture was transferred into sterile BHI (5&#x00A0;ml) in a centrifuge tube (15 l) followed by incubation at 37&#x00B0;C and 150&#x00A0;rpm to obtain cells in the late log phase (LLP, 9&#x00A0;h), early stationary phase (ESP, 24&#x00A0;h), late stationary phase (LSP, 48&#x00A0;h) and early death phase (EDP, 720&#x00A0;h), respectively. The culture was centrifuged for 5&#x00A0;min at 2,100 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> and the pellet resuspended into 5&#x00A0;ml of the selected media as described below and adjusted to achieve a starting concentration of 10<sup>4</sup>&#x00A0;CFU/ml.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Growth Cultures</title>
<p>Analysis of cultures of DT104 for growth kinetic determinations were performed in centrifuge tubes (15&#x00A0;ml). Cultures grown under pH stress contained 5&#x00A0;ml of BHI adjusted to pH of 5, 7, or 9 with 1&#x00A0;N HCl or 1&#x00A0;N NaOH. Cultures grown under osmotic stress contained 5&#x00A0;ml of BHI adjusted to 2, 3 and 4% NaCl (Difco Lab, MI, USA). DT104 was also grown in ground chicken extract (GCE) prepared as previously described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Fratamico et&#x00A0;al. (2011)</xref> with modifications. Fresh raw, 85% lean ground chicken was obtained from a local supermarket and high pressure processed (HPP) at 87,500&#x00A0;psi (603&#x00A0;MPa) for 2.5&#x00A0;min. Sterile water (15&#x00A0;ml) was added to ground chicken (50&#x00A0;g) in a stomacher bag and pummeled for 1&#x00A0;min, the liquid extract was removed by centrifugation at 2,100 &#x00D7; g for 5&#x00A0;min, and then filtered using a 0.22&#x00A0;&#x03BC;m filter, and frozen at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C until used. Growth cultures were incubated at 37&#x00B0;C and 150&#x00A0;rpm for 0 to 30&#x00A0;h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Microbial Analysis</title>
<p>At selected times post inoculation, depending on the age of the culture and growth culture medium of incubation, 50&#x00A0;&#x03BC;l of undiluted and appropriate 1:10 diluted (10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> to 10<sup>&#x2212;5</sup>) samples from growth cultures were spiral plated (Microbiology International, Frederick, MD) onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates. Sampling times for each growth condition (i.e. pH, salt concentration and GCE) were based on estimated lag time (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>), specific growth rate (<italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>), and maximum population density (<italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>) and were selected to produce a growth curve that accurately defined the lag, log and stationary phase over three log cycles of growth. The TSA plates were incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 24&#x00A0;h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Predictive Growth Modeling</title>
<p>U.S. Department of Agriculture, Integrated Pathogen Modeling Program (IPMP) 2013 was used in this study. It is a free and easy-to-use data analysis platform for fitting primary models. Primary models include common growth and inactivation models, which can be used to analyze full growth curves, incomplete growth curves and inactivation/survival curves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Huang, 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>The data from the samples were assigned to IPMP 2013. The primary models evaluated were the full-growth Baranyi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Baranyi and Roberts, 1994</xref>), reparametrized Gompertz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Zwietering et&#x00A0;al., 1990</xref>), Huang (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Huang, 2014</xref>), and Buchanan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Buchanan et&#x00A0;al., 1997</xref>) three-phase linear. The performance of the models is based on the production of the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The AIC is to estimate the likelihood of a model to predict/estimate the future values. A lower AIC value indicates a better fit. The Baranyi model, results not shown, was chosen because it was the best fit for growth data and had the lowest AIC value.</p>
<p>The Baranyi model is the following:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1">
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03BC;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>{</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03BC;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>}</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E2">
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x03BC;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>Y</italic><sub>0</sub>, <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>, and <italic>Y</italic>(<italic>t</italic>) are the bacterial population, in natural logarithm of bacteria counts, at initial, maximum and time <italic>t</italic>. <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> is the specific growth rate; <italic>h</italic><sub>o</sub> is the physiological state of the microorganism under consideration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Scanning Electron Microscope and Transmission Electron Microscope</title>
<p>Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) was performed on cultures (20&#x00A0;&#x03BC;l) of DT104&#x00A0;in different life cycle phases as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al. (2009)</xref>. A one-way analysis of variance was used to determine the effect of the previous life cycle phase on the cell length of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104. Pairwise comparisons were made by Tukey&#x2019;s least significant difference test (<italic>&#x03B1;</italic>&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;0.05) using Statistix 9 (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Antibiotic Susceptibility Disk Diffusion</title>
<p>Cultures of DT104&#x00A0;in different life cycle phases were tested for antibiotic susceptibility by the disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany). The&#x00A0;antibiotic sensitivity of the cultures of DT104&#x00A0;in different life cycle phases were evaluated according to classification guidelines suggested by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). The cultures were tested for susceptibility to a panel of antibiotics including gentamicin (GM; 10&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), sulphamethoxazole x trimethoprim (SXT; 25&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), kanamycin (K; 30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), tetracycline (TE; 30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), nalidixic acid (NA; 30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), trimethoprim (TMP; 5&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), centriaxone (CRO; 30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), sulfisoxazole (G; 250&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), chloramphenicol (C; 30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g), and streptomycin (S; 10&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g) using the disk diffusion method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Briggs and Fratamico, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">O&#x2019;Leary et&#x00A0;al., 2015</xref>). The zones of inhibition (ZOI) were measured and the isolates were classified as being susceptible, intermediate or resistant to the antibiotic according to the NCCLS guidelines.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine&#x00A0;the effect of the previous life cycle phase, growth medium (independent variables) and their interaction on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic>, <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max,</sub> and <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> (dependent variables) of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104&#x00A0;in various growth mediums (GCE and BHI) generated from the Baranyi model using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San&#x00A0;Diego,&#x00A0;CA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Growth Models</title>
<p>The experimental data obtained at various previous life cycle phases and under environmental conditions and stresses was fitted to the full Baranyi growth model (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figures 2</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="fig4" ref-type="fig">4</xref>). The Baranyi model was a good fit to the growth data to accurately estimate the growth parameters (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>, <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>, and <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>) for statistical analysis. The lower and upper 95% confidence intervals were defined for individual predictions.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Baranyi model for <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium DT104&#x00A0;in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) and ground chicken extract (GCE) at 37&#x00B0;C. Observed, predicted, upper 95% confidence interval (U95CI), and lower 95% confidence interval (L95CI).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Baranyi model for <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium DT104 brain heart infusion broth (BHI) at pH&#x00A0;5, 7, and 9 at 37&#x00B0;C. Observed, predicted, upper 95% confidence interval (U95CI), and lower 95% confidence interval (L95CI).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Baranyi model for <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium DT104&#x00A0;in brain heart infusion (BHI) at salt concentration 2, 3, and 4% at 37&#x00B0;C. Observed, predicted, upper 95% confidence interval (U95CI) and lower 95% confidence interval (L95CI).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Brain Heart Infusion Broth vs. Ground Chicken Extract</title>
<p>The cultures responded differently depending upon the phase of the culture. There was a significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) interaction between the medium and previous life cycle phase on the <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>. As seen in <xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>, the EDP in BHI had a lower (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> (8.95 log CFU/ml) in comparison to the LLP, ESP, and LSP (9.19, 9.16, and 9.16 log CFU/ml, respectively). In the GCE there was no significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;0.05) effect of the previous life cycle phases on the <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>. There was no significant interaction between the media and previous life cycle phase on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> and <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> therefore only the main effects will be discussed. In BHI, the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) increased as the age of the previous life cycle phase increased except that the ESP <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> equaled the LSP <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> (LLP&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;ESP&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;LSP&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;EDP). There was also a significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) effect of the previous life cycle on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> in GCE. The EDP had the significantly <italic>(p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) longest <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> at 2.47&#x00A0;h and there was a significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&gt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) difference between LLP and LSP of 0.19&#x00A0;h (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>). The LLP had a significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) lower <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> than ESP in both BHI (1.03 vs. 1.18&#x00A0;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, respectively) and GCE (0.96 vs. 1.10&#x00A0;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) (<xref rid="fig5" ref-type="fig">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The lag time (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>), growth rate (<italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>), and maximum growth (<italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>) of <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium DT104 as a function of the previous life cycle phase, late log phase (LLP), early stationary phase (ESP), late stationary phase (LSP), and early death phase (EDP) in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) and ground chicken extract (GCE). Different lowercase and uppercase letters within a cluster of bars differed significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<title>pH Levels</title>
<p>There was a significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) interaction on the <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> between the previous life cycle phase and various pH levels (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>). At pH&#x00A0;5 and 9, the EDP had a lower (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> than the LLP, ESP, and LSP. While at pH&#x00A0;7, the previous life cycle phase had no significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;0.05) effect on the <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>. While there was a significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) interaction on the <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>, there was none (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;0.05) on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> and <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>. Similar to BHI and GCE, the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) increased as the age of the previous life cycle phase (LLP, ESP, LSP, and EDP) increased in both pH&#x00A0;5 (1.40, 1.90, 2.41, and 3.67&#x00A0;h, respectively) and pH&#x00A0;9 (1.04, 1.58, 2.13, and 3.56&#x00A0;h, respectively) (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>). At pH&#x00A0;7, the previous life cycle phase also had a significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) effect on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> (LLP&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;ESP&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;LSP&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;EDP). The previous life cycle phase had no significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&gt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) effect on the <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> regardless of the pH level (<xref rid="fig6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The lag time (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>), growth rate (<italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>), and maximum growth (<italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>) of <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium DT104 as a function of the previous life cycle phase, late log phase (LLP), early stationary phase (ESP), late stationary phase (LSP), and early death phase (EDP) in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) at pH&#x00A0;5, 7, and 9. Different lowercase and uppercase letters within a cluster of bars differed significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<title>Salt Levels</title>
<p>In pertaining to the salt concentrations and the previous life cycle phase, there was a significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) interaction on the <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>). At 2 and 4% salt concentration, the LLP had the highest (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> and the previous life cycle phase had no significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) effect on the <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> at 3% salt concentration. The previous life cycle phase and salt concentration had no significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&gt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) interaction on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> and <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>. At 3 and 4% salt concentration the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> of LLP and ESP was not significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;0.05) different and then the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) increased from the ESP to the EDP. However, at 2% salt the EDP had the longest (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;0.05) <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> (3.91&#x00A0;h). The salt concentrations had no significant (<italic>p&#x00A0;&gt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) effect on the <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> regardless of the previous life cycle phase (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>The lag time (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>), growth rate (<italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>) and maximum growth (<italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>) of <italic>S</italic>. Typhimurium DT104 as a function of the previous life cycle phase, late log phase&#x00A0;(LLP), early stationary phase (ESP), late stationary phase (LSP), and early death phase (EDP) in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) at salt concentrations 2, 3, and 4%. Different lowercase and uppercase letters within a cluster of bars differed significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<title>Scanning Electron Microscope and Transmission Electron Microscope</title>
<p>Representative photomicrographs of cells of DT104&#x00A0;in different phases are shown in <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref>. The SEM photomicrographs depicts the cells decreasing in size as they transitioned from the log phase (LP) to the EDP and size increased (recovered) transitioning back to the LP and stationary phase (SP) previously from the EDP. In the LP and SP the cells were rod-shaped while a cocci (spherical) shape appeared in the EDP. ANOVA of the SEM data revealed that cell length was significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.05) affected by the growth phase with the LLP (2.79&#x00A0;&#x03BC;m)&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;LLP (previously EDP) (2.53&#x00A0;&#x03BC;m)&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;SP (previously EDP) (2.25&#x00A0;&#x03BC;m)&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;SP (2.14&#x00A0;&#x03BC;m)&#x00A0;&gt;&#x00A0;EDP (1.81&#x00A0;&#x03BC;m).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104 at different growth phases, log phase (LP), stationary phase (SP), and early death phase (EDP) in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) at 37&#x00B0;C. Bars: 1.0 &#x03BC;m (SEM) and 500 nm (TEM).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01043-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<title>Antibiotic Susceptibility Disk Diffusion</title>
<p>Cells from the LP, SP, and EDP grown in BHI were examined for their resistance to antibiotic treatment using susceptibility disk diffusion. DT104 from all phases were resistant to tetracycline (TE), sulfisoxazole (G), chloramphenicol (C) and streptomycin (S). In <xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>, cells recovered from the EDP were more susceptible to the antimicrobial agents than the other phases especially for sulphamethoxazole x trimethoprim (SXT), in which the EDP was classified as susceptible to the antibiotic (ZOI 17.5&#x00A0;mm) but ESP, LSP and LLP (previously EDP) were intermediate. Cells from the LLP (previously EDP) are cells recovered from the EDP, regrown in fresh BHI to the LLP. Cells from the LLP (previously EDP) ZOI was similar to ESP and LSP when subjected to SXT, nalidixic acid (NA) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) except for gentamicin (GM), kanamycin (K) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) it was more susceptible and trimethoprim (TMP) and centriaxone (CRO) less susceptible. The LLP was more susceptible to GM, SXT, NA and CIP than ESP and LSP except for CRO, LLP was less susceptible.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Antibiotic disk diffusion of <italic>Salmonella</italic> Typhimurium DT104 as a function of previous life cycle phase.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="6">Zone of inhibition (mm)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">LLP</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">ESP</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">LSP</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">EDP</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">LLP (previously EDP)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="6">
<bold>Aminoglycosides</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Gentamicin (10&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (20.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (18.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (18.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (22.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (21.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Kanamycin (30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (17.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (18.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (17.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (22.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (19.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Streptomycin (10&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="6">
<bold>Cephems</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Ceftriaxone (30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (27.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (28.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (28.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (31.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (26.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="6">
<bold>Folate pathway inhibitors</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Sulfisoxazole (250&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Sulfamethoxazole X<break/>Trimethoprim (25&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">S (16.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">I (14.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">I (14.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">S (17.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">I (14.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Trimethoprim (5&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (19.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (18.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (19.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (22.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (17.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="6">
<bold>Phenicols</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Chloramphenicol (30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (&#x2013;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="6">
<bold>Quinolones and fluoroquinolones</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Ciprofloxacin (5&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (32.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (31.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (32.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (37.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (33.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Nalidixic acid (30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (20.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (19.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (19.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (22.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">S (19.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="6">
<bold>Tetracyclines</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Tetracycline (30&#x00A0;&#x03BC;g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (9.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (9.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (9.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (9.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">R (9.0)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>R&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;Resistant</italic></p>
<p><italic>I&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;Intermediate</italic></p>
<p><italic>S&#x00A0;=&#x00A0;Susceptible</italic></p>
<p><italic>LLP,&#x00A0;late log phase; ESP,&#x00A0;early stationary phase; LSP,&#x00A0;late stationary phase; and EDP,&#x00A0;early death phase.</italic></p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec20" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec30">
<title>Growth Phases and Model Evaluation</title>
<p>It has been reported that the previous growth pH of a culture has a significant effect on the growth kinetics of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Oscar, 1999c</xref>) while the previous temperature and growth salt concentration is not a major factor affecting <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium growth kinetics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Oscar, 1999a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">b</xref>). The model development phase of this study involved 32 growth curves conducted under combinations of pH, NaCl % and previous growth phase (LLP, ESP, LSP, and EDP) identified in <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>. IPMP 2013 was able to accurately fit the experimental data to the full Baranyi growth model. The smaller the value of the residual standard deviation, the better the fit of the regression curve to the data is (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Lee et&#x00A0;al., 2015</xref>). The <italic>&#x03BB;</italic>, <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>, and <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> values presented in this study pertain to the Baranyi model. The growth parameters may vary to some extent dependent upon the model. Growth at pH&#x00A0;5 (0.078) was the most accurately predicted data of the medium and the ESP (0.085) of the previous life phases.</p>
<p>Previous studies have demonstrated that after a short and rapid decline in the death phase, the culture maintains a stable density for an extended period of time (long-term survival phase) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Llorens et&#x00A0;al., 2010</xref>). Exhibiting a different growth curve, in this study, the stationary phase (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>) lasted for a longer period of time in comparison of the stationary phase in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al. (2009)</xref>. DT104 was not able to establish a LTS phase whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Llorens et&#x00A0;al. (2010)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al. (2009)</xref> maintained their own viable population at a constant population by continuous growth and death of cells. Although not establishing a LTS phase, the DT104 cells in the EDP died at a slow rate to survive for an extended period of time. When entering the death phase of the life cycle, the bacteria encounter an environment deprived of essential nutrients, i.e. carbon, phosphate, and nitrogen. <italic>Salmonella</italic> may encounter periods of starvation in natural, host microenvironments and commercial environments. When deprived of carbon energy sources, <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium undergoes morphological changes as illustrated in <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref> of the EDP which at times is referred to as starvation-stress response (SSR) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Spector and Kenyon, 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>To survive for an extended period of time, bacteria develop survival skills and strategies enabling them to persist in the environment until optimum growth conditions are met (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Watson et&#x00A0;al., 1998</xref>). Gram-negative bacteria such as <italic>Vibrio cholerae, Escherichia coli,</italic> and <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium may enter a state of dormancy or viable but not culturable (VBNC). In this state, cells are capable of metabolic activity but are unable to undergo cellular division to form a colony (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Watson et&#x00A0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Spector and Kenyon, 2012</xref>). Additional research is needed to determine whether the cells in the EDP of <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref> are VBNC, which may explain the slow death rate. <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium may also utilize nutrients that are not readily available in optimal growth conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Spector and Kenyon, 2012</xref>). In non-favorable growth conditions and environments, living cells utilize cryptic growth, which is the recycling of nutrients from dead cells for maintenance. In comparison to active and growing cells, cells transition from a rod shape to an efficient and smaller coccoid shape aiding in long term survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Watson et&#x00A0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">2013</xref>). During that transition, <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium may use quorum sensing (QS) when responding to their own population density (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ahmer et&#x00A0;al., 1998</xref>). When a high-density cell culture senses limited nutrients, they undergo a form of programmed cell death, also known as bacterial apoptosis. The majority of the population enters a &#x201C;death mode&#x201D; while the surviving cells exit the death program after another signal is released perhaps from the lysed cells and may proceed to reproduce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Finkel, 2006</xref>). This also might explain the survival of cells in the EDP. Quorum sensing is first initiated by small hormone-like molecules called autoinducers (AIs) that accumulate and monitor the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Bearson and Bearson, 2008</xref>). The LuxR homologue, SdiA achieves intercellular signaling and is capable of interspecies communication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Walters and Sperandio, 2006</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec21">
<title>Brain Heart Infusion and Ground Chicken Extract</title>
<p>BHI is a common nutrient rich broth used for the growth of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium and other fastidious and nonfastidious bacteria. The components (g/L) in BHI include: brain heart, infusion from solids (6), peptic digest of animal tissue (6), pancreatic digest of gelatin (14.5), dextrose (3), sodium chloride (5), and disodium phosphate (2.5). Chicken contains protein, including all of the essential amino acids, minerals (calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorous, potassium, sodium, zinc and selenium), vitamins (niacin, pantothenic acid, vitamin B6 and B12, folate and folic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">USDA/ARS, 2016</xref>). BHI contains 3.0&#x00A0;g/l of dextrose, whereas GCE does not and has a lower pH (6.4) than BHI (7.4). Overall, the GCE had a lower <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> than BHI (8.77 vs. 9.12 log CFU/ml, respectively). This may be due to the limited nutrients in the GCE, containing no carbohydrates, while BHI contains dextrose.</p>
<p>The present study and previous ones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Oscar, 1999a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">2006</xref>) demonstrated that chicken based mediums can be used to develop models for the growth of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium in the place of traditional lab media. The <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> of BHI after reinoculation of the ESP cells was 1.47&#x00A0;h which is similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Oscar (1997)</xref> at 1.25&#x00A0;h with similar growth conditions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Oscar (1997)</xref> reported a slower <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> at 0.86 log CFU/ml/h compared to 1.18 log CFU/ml/h in the present study. The <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> of GCE after reinoculation of the ESP cells was 1.45&#x00A0;h while in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Oscar (2007)</xref>, a study that developed predictive growth models for DT104&#x00A0;in ground chicken, had a <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> of 1.39 and 1.66&#x00A0;h at 34 and 40&#x00B0;C, respectively. Using IPMP 2013 we determined the significance (<italic>p</italic>&#x00A0;&lt;&#x00A0;0.05) of the previous life cycle phase and media on the growth kinetics of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104.</p>
<p>A follow-up study will be performed on <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104&#x00A0;in GCE examining the global transcriptional profile of DT104 to provide insights on how this food matrix influences growth and survival and potentially identify specific genes that may be targeted for the development of control strategies. Previously, it has been difficult to perform transcriptomics in complex medium but due to technology advancement it has become possible instead of using a simple medium as BHI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Fratamico et&#x00A0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Deng et&#x00A0;al., 2012</xref>). GCE may be a better growth medium to mimic a poultry environment in place of BHI for transcriptomic analysis of <italic>Salmonella</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec22">
<title>pH</title>
<p><italic>Salmonella</italic> may encounter various pH levels in food production. Acid-based antimicrobial solutions such as chlorine, organic acids, peroxyacetic and peracetic acid are commonly used in the poultry industry to reduce <italic>Salmonella</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter</italic> contamination on poultry and poultry products. Studies such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Oscar (1999c)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gibson et&#x00A0;al. (1988)</xref> developed <italic>Salmonella</italic> growth models in broth media and demonstrated <italic>Salmonella</italic> ability to grow at low pH levels of 5.2 and 5.63, respectively. This study was carried out at a lower pH of 5 and demonstrated an ability of DT104 to grow in an unfavorable environment. Preliminary results (data not shown) demonstrated DT104 ability to grow at pH&#x00A0;&#x2265;&#x00A0;4.5 but not at less than &lt;4.5, this may be due to inability to maintain an adequate internal pH level. To the best our knowledge this is the first study that examined the effect of the previous life cycle and pH on the growth kinetics of a food pathogen. The starved cells in the EDP spent 2.27&#x00A0;h longer in the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> than LLP taking more time to adjust and adapt to pH&#x00A0;5 (<xref rid="fig3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<p>The growth kinetics have not frequently been studied at an alkaline pH. Alkaline cleaning agents are used in the food industry to remove biofilm, contamination, food, fat, and protein from processing equipment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Gibson et&#x00A0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Sharma et&#x00A0;al., 2005</xref>). Cleaners such as alkaline chlorinated cleaners work by temporarily imparting hydrophilic properties to stainless steel that decrease attachment to surfaces. While <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Humphrey (1987)</xref> carried out a study demonstrating the inactivation of <italic>Salmonella</italic> at high pH and temperature, this is the first study to the best of our knowledge performing predictive growth models of <italic>Salmonella</italic> at high pH (pH&#x00A0;9).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec23">
<title>Salt</title>
<p>Salt is commonly added to food products to lower the water activity and inhibit microbial growth of pathogens and spoilage bacteria. In the presence of salt, the growth of bacteria is dependent upon the presence of osmoprotectants. In an abrupt shift of osmotic stress, cells accumulate harmful substrates such as K<sup>+</sup> and glutamine. These substrates are replaced by proline, trehalose and glycine betaine, which are taken up from the medium or synthesized <italic>de novo</italic> by the cell to stimulate growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Zhou et&#x00A0;al., 2011</xref>). Various studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Matches and Liston, 1972</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Mellefont et&#x00A0;al., 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">2004</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">2005</xref>) have been carried out showing an extended <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> of <italic>Salmonella</italic> as the salt concentration increases and the a<sub>w</sub> decreases. The study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Mellefont et&#x00A0;al. (2004)</xref> carried out at a lower a<sub>w</sub> demonstrated that the cells from the log phase after reinoculation had a longer relative lag time than the cells from the stationary phase in contrast to our study, where cells from the LLP after reinoculation had a shorter <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> than the ESP but was carried out a higher <italic>a<sub>w</sub>
</italic> until at 4% NaCl cells from the LLP had a longer <italic>&#x03BB;</italic>. These studies demonstrate that at concentrations higher than 4%, the cells from the LLP are not able to adjust to abrupt osmotic shifts. The cells with shorter <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> may have better defense systems which prepares them to survive various environmental stresses without prior exposure. Further research is needed to better understand these mechanisms.</p>
<p>Similar to other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Ross et&#x00A0;al., 2003</xref>), the <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub> decreased with the addition of salt (<xref rid="fig7" ref-type="fig">Figure 7</xref>). This occurrence may be due to the initial response to osmotic shift with cells having three phases: dehydration, adjustment, and rehydration. After respiration and ion transport are stopped from exposure to the shock, the respiration will resume and accumulate K<sup>+</sup>, glutamate and solutes. Unlike, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Zhou et&#x00A0;al. (2011)</xref> there was an initial decrease in cell density in basic minimal medium at high salt concentration, DT104 did not have a decrease due to essential proteins and enzymes present in the BHI.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec24">
<title>Scanning Electron Microscope and Transmission Electron Microscope</title>
<p>Like <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104&#x00A0;in this study, other bacteria such as <italic>L. monocytogenes</italic> and <italic>S.</italic> Virchow have also shown a decrease in cell size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">McMahon et&#x00A0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al., 2009</xref>). DT104 transitioning back to the rod shape from the coccoid shape suggests that the cell formation is dependent upon the available nutrients. Starvation is known to induce a change in cell shape from rods to coccoid in <italic>Arthrobacter crystallopoietes, A. globiformis, Rhizobium leguminosarum</italic> and marine vibrio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Novitsky and Morita, 1976</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hamilton et&#x00A0;al., 1977</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Watson et&#x00A0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Demkina et&#x00A0;al., 2000</xref>). The EDP cells have a condensed cytoplasmic network in comparison to the other phases. This may explain the extended lag time of the subsequent EDP when introduced to a new environment. The coccoid shape may be formed by cell shrinkage and cytoplasmic condensation illustrated in <xref rid="fig8" ref-type="fig">Figure 8</xref> TEM. This may explain why the EDP cells require additional time to uptake available and essential nutrients and replenish fluidity in the cytoplasm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec25">
<title>Antibiotic Susceptibility Disk Diffusion</title>
<p>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the effect of life cycle phases on the antibiotic resistance profiles of viable cells of cultures after the stationary phase. The DT104 cells in the EDP exhibited less resistance to antibiotics than the cells from the LP and SP. The SP exhibited higher resistance to the antibiotics than the LP. A previous study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Tabak et&#x00A0;al. (2006)</xref> demonstrated <italic>Salmonella</italic> in a planktonic state was more resistant in the SP than the LP to triclosan. Although the aging cells in this study showed less resistance, a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Wen et&#x00A0;al. (2009)</xref> demonstrated <italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> barotolerance and thermotolerance significantly (<italic>p&#x00A0;&lt;</italic>&#x00A0;0.001) increased as the cells transitioned from the late log phase to the long term survival phase. However, a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Juck et&#x00A0;al. (2011)</xref> demonstrated that the cells in the log phase exhibited higher resistance to HPP than cells in the stationary phase.</p>
<p>DT104&#x00A0;in the EDP phase may have exhibited less resistance to antibiotics due to the loss of plasmids after prolong incubation time and depletion of nutrients. Various studies have reported a modification of the plasmid pattern after long periods of incubation in marine water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Mejri et&#x00A0;al., 2012</xref>). It is possible that as the cultures continue to grow in the media the oxygen and nutrients become progressively more limited resulting in rendering the EDP cells more sensitive to antibiotics compared to early cells. <italic>Salmonella</italic> is capable of forming biofilms in environmental stresses for protection and to increase its long-term survival. Biofilms, communities of bacterial cells, attach to one another and a surface. This structure may provide a higher degree of resistance to antibiotic agents, sanitizers and biocides. In the EDP, surviving in a state of low nutrients, DT104 formed visible clusters of biofilm along the wall and top layer of meniscus along the glass tube. However, the biofilm derived cells from the EDP were treated with antibiotics after disruption of the biofilm. This may have had an influence on the increased susceptibility to antibiotics compared to the other phases. After disruption, the potentially damaged cells from the EDP are exposed and vulnerable to the antibiotics.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec26" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Using IPMP 2013, we accurately fitted the experimental data to the Baranyi full growth model to determine the significance of the previous life cycle phase (LLP, ESP, LSP, and EDP) and media on the growth kinetics (<italic>&#x03BB;</italic>, <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>, and <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub>) of <italic>S.</italic> Typhimurium DT104. The results of this study showed that the previous life cycle phase has a significant effect on the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic>, <italic>&#x03BC;</italic><sub>max</sub>, and <italic>Y</italic><sub>max</sub> and was also dependent upon the media. Overall, the <italic>&#x03BB;</italic> increased as the age of the previous life cycle phase increased. EDP may have spent a longer time in the lag phase repairing damaged cells, taking up available and essential nutrients and replenishing fluidity in the cytoplasm.</p>
<p>The results of this study suggest that not only the previous growth pH and temperature should be considered when developing growth models but also the previous life cycle phase. If the culture from the log phase has a shorter <italic>&#x03BB;</italic>, studies that base their food growth model on foodborne pathogens from the stationary phase may be underestimated. Therefore, establishments that base their prerequisite programs or sanitation standard operating procedures on these models may be inadequate. Additional research on various serotypes of <italic>Salmonella</italic> is needed to prove this theory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec27">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>SP and JH contributed to the conception and design of the study. BV and JS contributed to the design of the study. JU contributed to the cellular morphology study. TO contributed to growth kineties study. JH performed experiments and wrote the draft first draft of the manuscript. SP, TO, and JU wrote sections of the manuscript. SP was responsible for the integrity of the work and overall supervision. All authors contributed to interpretation of the data, manuscript revision, read, and approved the manuscript.</p>
<sec id="sec29">
<title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>We would like to thank Joan Meredith for technical assistance. Earlier version of this manuscript has been released as a pre-print at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/21/326579">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/21/326579</ext-link> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Hawkins et&#x00A0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmer</surname> <given-names>B. M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reeuwijk</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Timmers</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valentine</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heffro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title><italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> encodes an SdiA homolog, a putative quorum sensor of the LuxR Family, that regulates gene on the virulence plasmid</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>1185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1193</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9495757</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baranyi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>277</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>294</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0168-1605(94)90157-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7873331</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bearson</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bearson</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The role of the QseC quorum-sensing sensor kinase in colonization and norepinephrine-enhanced motility of <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> serovar Typhimurium</article-title>. <source>Microb. Pathog.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>278</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micpath.2007.10.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17997077</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Briggs</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fratamico</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Molecular characterization of an antibiotic resistance gene cluster of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> DT104</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Ch.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>846</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>849</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.43.4.846</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whiting</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Damert</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>When is simple good enough: a comparison of the Gompertz, Baranyi, and three-phase linear models for fitting bacterial growth curves</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/fmic.1997.0125</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Demkina</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soina</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El&#x2019;-Registan</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zvyaginstev</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Reproductive resting forms of <italic>Arthrobacter globiformis</italic></article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>313</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02756739</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome sequencing of <italic>Salmonella enterica serovar</italic> Enteritidis under desiccation and starvation stress in peanut oil</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>315</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2011.11.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22265317</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Finkel</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Long-term survival during stationary phase: evolution and the GASP phenotype</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1340</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16415927</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fratamico</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Differential gene expression of <italic>E. coli</italic> O157:H7&#x00A0;in ground beef extract compared to tryptic soy broth</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>M79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>M87</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01952.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bratchell</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Predicting microbial growth: growth responses of salmonellae in a laboratory medium as affected by pH, sodium chloride and storage temperature</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1789</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0168-1605(88)90051-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3275296</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holah</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Efectiveness of cleaning techniques used in the food industry in terms of the removal of bacterial biofilms</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00790.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10432586</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Achberger</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolenbrander</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Control of morphogenesis in <italic>Arthrobacter crystallopoietes</italic>: effect of cyclic adenosine 3&#x2032;, 5&#x2032;-monophosphate</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>874</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>879</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">190210</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hawkins</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uknalis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vimini</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parveen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). The effect of previous life cycle phase on the growth kinetics, morphology and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella <italic>typhimurium</italic> DT104&#x00A0;in brain heart infusion and ground chicken extract [Preprint]. Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/21/326579">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/05/21/326579</ext-link> (Accessed April 20, 2019).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>IPMP 2013&#x2013;a comprehensive data analysis tool for predictive microbiology</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.11.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24334095</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Humphrey</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title><italic>Salmonella</italic> and <italic>Campylobacter</italic> contamination of broiler chicken carcasses and scald tank water: the influence of water pH</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Juck</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neetoo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beswick</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of prior growth conditions, pressuretreatment parameters, and recovery conditions on the inactivation and recovery of <italic>Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli,</italic> and <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> in turkey meat</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paik</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Predictive model for the growth kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus in raw pork developed using Integrated Pathogen Modeling Program (IPMP) 2013</article-title>. <source>Meat Sci.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.04.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25930109</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Llorens</surname> <given-names>J. M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tormo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Garcia</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Stationary phase in gram-negative</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>476</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>495</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00213.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20236330</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matches</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liston</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>Effects of incubation temperature on the salt tolerance of <italic>Salmonella</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Milk Food Technol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcdowell</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The pattern of pleiomorphism in stressed <italic>Salmonella</italic> Virchow populations is nutrient and growth phase dependent</article-title>. <source>Lett. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>276</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02187.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17718839</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mejri</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bour</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boukef</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallas</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mraouna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Got</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Inflluence of marine water conditions on <italic>Salmonella enterica s</italic>erovar Typhimurium survival</article-title>. <source>J. Food Safety</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>270</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>278</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1745-4565.2012.00377.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mellefont</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmeekin</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The effect of abrupt osmotic shifts on the lag phase duration of foodborne bacteria</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00377-X</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12745233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mellefont</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmeekin</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The effect of abrupt osmotic shifts on the lag phase duration of physiologically distinct populations of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00475-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15109788</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mellefont</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmeekin</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Viable count estimates of lag time responses for <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> M48 subjected to abrupt osmotic shifts</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>399</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>410</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.018</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16109449</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Novitsky</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morita</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>Morphological characterization of small cells resulting from nutrient starvation of a psychrophilic marine <italic>Vibrio</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>622</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">984833</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x2019;Leary</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mccabe</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mccusker</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fanning</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duffy</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Acid environments affect biofilm formation and gene expression in isolates of <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic> Typhimurium DT104</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.03.030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Growth kinetics of <italic>Salmonella</italic> isolates in a laboratory medium as affected by isolate and holding temperature</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>964</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>968</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999a</year>). <article-title>Response surface models for effects of temperature and previous growth sodium on growth kinetics of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> on cooked chicken breast</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1470</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1474</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999b</year>). <article-title>Response surface models for effects of temperature and previous temperature on lag time and specific growth rate of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> on cooked ground chicken breast</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1114</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999c</year>). <article-title>Response surface models for effects of temperature, pH, and previous growth pH on growth kinetics of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> in brain heart infusion broth</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>106</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Validation of a tertiary for predicting variation of a <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> DT104 (ATCC 700408) growth from a low initial density on ground chicken breast with a competitive microflora</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>2048</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2057</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X-69.9.2048</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16995505</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Predictive models for growth of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> DT104 from low and high initial density on ground chicken with a natural microflora</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>640</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>651</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2006.11.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17418316</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Validation of a predictive model for survival and growth of <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> on chicken skin for extrapolation to a previous history of frozen storage</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>1035</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-362</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23726201</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parveen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taabodi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oscar</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harter-Dennis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of <italic>Salmonella</italic> recovered from processed poultry</article-title>. <source>J. Food Prot.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>2466</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2472</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4315/0362-028X-70.11.2466</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18044422</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ratkowsky</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mellefont</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmeekin</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Modeling the effects of temperature, water activity, pH and lactic acid concentration on the growth rate of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00252-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12505458</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scallan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angulo</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tauxe</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Widdowson</surname> <given-names>M.-A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Foodborne illness acquired in the United&#x00A0;States&#x2014;major pathogens</article-title>. <source>Emerg. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3201/eid1701.P11101</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21192848</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beuchat</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Inactivation of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7&#x00A0;in biofilm on stainless steel by treatment with an alkaline cleaner and a bacteriophage</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>459</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02659.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16108786</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spector</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kenyon</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Resistance and survival strategies of <italic>Salmonella</italic> enterica to environmental stresses</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>481</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tabak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scher</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartog</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Romling</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matthews</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chikindas</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Effect of triclosan on <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> at different growth stages and in biofilms</article-title>. <source>FEMS: Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>267</volume>, <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00547.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">U.S. Department of Ariculture&#x2013;Agricultural Research Service (USDA/ARS)</collab></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). National nutrient database for standard reference release 28: Full report (all nutrients): 05011, chicken, broilers or fryers, meat only raw.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sperandio</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Quorum sensing in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella</italic></article-title>. <source>Int J. Med. Microbiol.</source> <volume>296</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.041</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16487745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watson</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clements</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Foster</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Characterixation of the starvation-survival response of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>1750</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1758</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9537371</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anantheswarn</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knabel</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Changes in barotolerance, thermotolerance, and cellular morphology throughout the life cycle of <italic>Listeria moncytogenes</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>1581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1588</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01942-08</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19168646</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karthikeyan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hawkins</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anantheswarn</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knabel</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title><italic>Listeria monocytogenes</italic> responds to cells densitity as it transistions to the long-term-survival phase</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>165</volume>, <fpage>326</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>331</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.05.014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23810956</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">World Health Organization (WHO)</collab></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). Salmonella (non-typhoidal). Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs139/en/">http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs139/en/</ext-link> (Accessed April 26, 2018).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>George</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Metris</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baranyi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Lag phase of <italic>Salmonella</italic> enterica under osmotic stress conditions</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>1758</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1762</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02629-10</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21193660</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zwietering</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jongenburger</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rombouts</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van 'T Riet</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Modeling of the bacterial growth curve</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1875</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1881</lpage>. PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16348228</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding.</bold> This project was supported by the U.S. Department of Education, Title III, USDA Evans Allen and Perdue Farms, Inc.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>