<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.01605</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Transcriptional Response of <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> to Rapid Chromosome Relaxation or Long-Term Supercoiling Imbalance</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Szafran</surname> <given-names>Marcin Jan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/554274/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gongerowska</surname> <given-names>Martyna</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/741061/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ma&#x0142;ecki</surname> <given-names>Tomasz</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/757451/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Elliot</surname> <given-names>Marie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/385548/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>Dagmara</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Wroc&#x0142;aw</institution>, <addr-line>Wroc&#x0142;aw</addr-line>, <country>Poland</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Biology, M.G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University</institution>, <addr-line>Hamilton, ON</addr-line>, <country>Canada</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: K&#x00FC;r&#x015F;ad Turgay, Max Planck Unit for the Science of Pathogens, Germany</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Natalia Tschowri, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany; Dennis Claessen, Leiden University, Netherlands; Wiep Klaas Smits, Leiden University, Netherlands</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Marcin Jan Szafran, <email>marcin.szafran@uwr.edu.pl</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Microbial Physiology and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>11</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1605</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>09</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2019 Szafran, Gongerowska, Ma&#x0142;ecki, Elliot and Jakimowicz.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Szafran, Gongerowska, Ma&#x0142;ecki, Elliot and Jakimowicz</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Negative DNA supercoiling allows chromosome condensation and facilitates DNA unwinding, which is required for the occurrence of DNA transaction processes, i.e., DNA replication, transcription and recombination. In bacteria, changes in chromosome supercoiling impact global gene expression; however, the limited studies on the global transcriptional response have focused mostly on pathogenic species and have reported various fractions of affected genes. Furthermore, the transcriptional response to long-term supercoiling imbalance is still poorly understood. Here, we address the transcriptional response to both novobiocin-induced rapid chromosome relaxation or long-term topological imbalance, both increased and decreased supercoiling, in environmental antibiotic-producing bacteria belonging to the <italic>Streptomyces</italic> genus. During the <italic>Streptomyces</italic> complex developmental cycle, multiple copies of GC-rich linear chromosomes present in hyphal cells undergo profound topological changes, from being loosely condensed in vegetative hyphae, to being highly compacted in spores. Moreover, changes in chromosomal supercoiling have been suggested to be associated with the control of antibiotic production and environmental stress response. Remarkably, in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic>, a model <italic>Streptomyces</italic> species, topoisomerase I (TopA) is solely responsible for the removal of negative DNA supercoils. Using a <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> strain in which <italic>topA</italic> transcription is under the control of an inducible promoter, we identified genes involved in the transcriptional response to long-term supercoiling imbalance. The affected genes are preferentially organized in several clusters, and a supercoiling-hypersensitive cluster (SHC) was found to be located in the core of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome. The transcripts affected by long-term topological imbalance encompassed genes encoding nucleoid-associated proteins, DNA repair proteins and transcriptional regulators, including multiple developmental regulators. Moreover, using a gyrase inhibitor, we identified those genes that were directly affected by novobiocin, and found this was correlated with increased AT content in their promoter regions. In contrast to the genes affected by long-term supercoiling changes, among the novobiocin-sensitive genes, a significant fraction encoded for proteins associated with membrane transport or secondary metabolite synthesis. Collectively, our results show that long-term supercoiling imbalance globally regulates gene transcription and has the potential to impact development, secondary metabolism and DNA repair, amongst others.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>TopA</kwd>
<kwd>DNA supercoiling</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Streptomyces</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic></kwd>
<kwd>gene regulation</kwd>
<kwd>topoisomerase</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="75"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>A bacterial chromosome is highly constrained within the cell, yet remains accessible for DNA replication, segregation and transcription. In bacteria, these processes are not separated in space and time, and their co-occurrence significantly impacts chromosome architecture. Chromosome topology is sustained by the coordinated action of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), condensins (SMC, MukB), and DNA topoisomerases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dame, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dillon and Dorman, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Rovinskiy et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bjorkegren and Baranello, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Racko et al., 2018</xref>). Whereas NAPs are responsible for local DNA bending, wrapping and bridging, which organize the bacterial chromosome into topologically independent domains, condensins, and topoisomerases induce global compaction and control overall chromosome negative supercoiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Lindow et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Postow et al., 2004</xref>). Moreover, topoisomerases are critical for the removal of excessive DNA supercoiling generated by DNA replication and transcription (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baaklini et al., 2008</xref>). All known bacterial genomes encode at least two essential topoisomerases &#x2013; topoisomerase I (TopA and TopoI) and gyrase (GyrAB). Whereas TopA removes negative DNA supercoils, gyrase generates negative supercoils, thus, the opposite activities of TopA and GyrAB are essential for maintaining topological balance (topological homeostasis) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Champoux, 2001</xref>). Disturbances in the topological balance are reflected in the changes in transcriptional activity of the so-called supercoiling-sensitive genes (SSGs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>). Decreased level of DNA supercoiling, resulting from gyrase inhibition, affects the transcription of approximately 7% of genes in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and up to 37% of genes in <italic>Haemophilus influenzae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Gmuender et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>). Similarly, increased supercoiling, generated by the inhibition of TopA activity, leads to changes in the transcription of 10% of all genes in <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ferrandiz et al., 2016</xref>). Although the influence of global DNA supercoiling on overall gene transcription in bacteria is well established, the scale of transcriptional changes differs between bacteria, and much is still not understood about these processes.</p>
<p>The genes most efficiently induced by the shift in DNA supercoiling are those that are critical for restoring topological balance, and encompass genes encoding topoisomerases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Tse-Dinh, 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahmed et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>), NAPs, and condensins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Schneider et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ghosh et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Guha et al., 2018</xref>). However, SSGs also include genes involved in the regulation of many other cellular processes, i.e., DNA replication, cell division, and metabolic pathways, as well as DNA repair or stress adaptation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>). Interestingly, even after the apparent restoration of supercoiling homeostasis, the transcription of many genes has been reported to remain affected (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ferr&#x00E1;ndiz et al., 2014</xref>). Since changes in chromosome supercoiling are induced by environmental stresses, including osmotic and oxidative stress, host invasion and temperature down- or up-shift, transcriptional regulation by chromosome topology may be an important bacterial strategy for rapid adaptation to stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Horiuchi et al., 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Camacho-Carranza et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Tse-Dinh et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Weinstein-Fischer et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Cheung et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cameron et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Given that soil bacteria are exposed to a wide range of environmental stressors, they have evolved a multitude of strategies to facilitate their survival in harsh conditions. A classic example is provided by the soil-dwelling <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, which are Gram-positive, mycelial bacteria that possess linear, GC-rich chromosomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bentley et al., 2002</xref>). <italic>Streptomyces</italic> environmental niche adaptations include a complex regulatory network that employs a high number of transcriptional regulators, including more than 60 sigma factors and approximately 60&#x2013;70 two component systems (TCSs). Moreover, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> possess a high number of DNA protection proteins and enzymes involved in the posttranslational modifications of proteins, i.e., proteases, acetyltransferases, and kinases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">de Crecy-Lagard et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Hutchings et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Facey et al., 2009</xref>). Finally, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> produce an assortment of secondary metabolites with varied biological activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jeong et al., 2016</xref>) and exhibit a complex life cycle that involves the formation of stress-resistant spores. Vegetatively growing <italic>Streptomyces</italic> develop branched multicellular hyphae composed of elongated cells containing multiple loosely condensed chromosomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Kim et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">McCormick and Flardh, 2012</xref>). During sporulation, the multigenomic unbranched aerial hyphae are converted into chains of unigenomic spores. This transition involves the condensation and segregation of tens of chromosomes, which in turn is coordinated with multiple synchronized cell divisions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Jakimowicz et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Kois et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Jakimowicz and van Wezel, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>). The different steps of <italic>Streptomyces</italic> differentiation are tightly regulated by a cascade of regulatory proteins (encoded by the <italic>bld</italic> and <italic>whi</italic> genes) that controls the expression of those genes involved in cell division and spore maturation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Flardh and Buttner, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">McCormick and Flardh, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bush et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Streptomyces</italic> sporulation involves prominent changes in chromosome organization and requires the activity of proteins that exert chromosome rearrangements, including topoisomerase TopA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>). In contrast to other bacterial species, TopA is the only type I topoisomerase in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>. As in other actinobacteria, the enzyme differs remarkably from its bacterial homologs in having an unusually high processivity, which is provided by a long stretch of alanine/lysine repeats in its C-terminal domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bhaduri et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Szafran et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Strzalka et al., 2017</xref>). In <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> and <italic>S. venezuelae</italic>, two model species broadly used in the studies of <italic>Streptomyces</italic> biology, TopA depletion increased DNA supercoiling and led to growth retardation as well as impaired spore production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Donczew et al., 2016</xref>). Thus, in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, the removal of the topological tensions by the activity of the highly processive and indispensable TopA is required for efficient growth and sporulation.</p>
<p>In <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, as in other bacteria (e.g., <italic>E. coli, Mycobacterium smegmatis</italic>, and <italic>S. pneumoniae</italic>), novobiocin-mediated gyrase inhibition leads to the rapid loss of chromosome supercoiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ferrandiz et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Guha et al., 2018</xref>). In most bacteria, topological balance is subsequently restored by simultaneous upregulation of gyrase genes, and downregulation of <italic>topA</italic> transcription (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Tse-Dinh, 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Unniraman and Nagaraja, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ferrandiz et al., 2010</xref>), while uniquely in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, chromosome relaxation appears to affect only the <italic>gyrBA</italic> operon but does not influence <italic>topA</italic> transcription (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>). Conversely, increased negative chromosome supercoiling caused by depletion of TopA leads to the induction of <italic>topA</italic> expression, but, interestingly, does not influence <italic>gyrBA</italic> transcription which seems also unique for <italic>Streptomyces</italic>. Changes in topoisomerase levels or superhelical density have also been observed as a result of <italic>Streptomyces</italic> exposure to increased temperature or osmotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aldridge et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>). Thus, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> provide an interesting model for studies of topological homeostasis and its role in stress responses, given their soil habitat and unique system of chromosome supercoiling maintenance.</p>
<p>Here, we analyzed the transcriptional response of <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> to changes in global chromosome supercoiling by inhibiting DNA gyrase activity. We identified those genes that were immediately impacted by the rapid loss of DNA supercoiling. Additionally, using a strain in which TopA levels could be modified we defined the effect of long-term topological imbalance on global gene expression.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Bacterial Strains</title>
<p>The <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> strains used in this study are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Strains used in this study.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Strain</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Relevant genotype</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Source or references</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M145</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SCP1<sup>-</sup> SCP2<sup>-</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bentley et al., 2002</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">M145 &#x0394;<italic>topA::scar</italic> attB&#x03A6;C31::pIJ6902<italic>topA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">M145 pIJ6902</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">This study</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MS10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">M145 pWHM3Hyg</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MS11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PS04 pWHM3Hyg</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To construct the PS08 strain wild type <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> (M145) was transformed with the integrative pIJ6902 plasmid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Huang et al., 2005</xref>) according to the procedures described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Kieser et al. (2000)</xref> and subsequently selected for apramycin resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Western Blot Analysis</title>
<p>To determine TopA protein levels, crude cell extracts were prepared from 18-h cultures in 79 medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Prauser and Falta, 1968</xref>). Cell lysate proteins (5 &#x03BC;g in total) were separated in a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel before being transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The TopA protein was subsequently detected using primary rabbit polyclonal anti-TopA antibodies and mouse secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich), according to the procedure described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>). The relative protein level (RPL) was calculated using Fiji Software as the TopA band intensity compared to the wild type strain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Reporter Plasmid Isolation</title>
<p>The pWHM3Hyg plasmid, which served as a probe of the DNA supercoiling state <italic>in vivo</italic>, was isolated, according to the procedure described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>), from <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> liquid cultures cultivated for 18 h in YEME/TSB or in 79 medium supplemented with 50 &#x03BC;g/ml hygromycin B (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Kieser et al., 2000</xref>) at 30&#x00B0;C. To inhibit gyrase activity and induce rapid chromosome relaxation, novobiocin was added to the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> culture to a final concentration of 10 &#x03BC;g/ml, which strongly inhibited <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> growth (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>), 10 min before mycelia were collected. The isolated plasmid DNA was resolved in an 0.8% agarose gel. To visualize particular topoisomers, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide. The topoisomer distribution was analyzed using ImageJ software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>RNA Isolation and RNA-Seq Analyses</title>
<p>To follow the effects of altered DNA topology on cellular transcription, RNA was isolated from <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> mycelia (2&#x2013;4 biological replicates) cultivated in 30 mL YEME/TSB liquid medium for 18 h. A single time point was used for all strains, since growth curve analyses indicated that in YEME/TSB medium, the growth of the PS04 strain cultured in the absence of inducer (TopA-depleted strain) during the initial stage of culture was only somewhat slower than wild type, and the transition phase (the growth arrest at late exponential phase) occurred at the same time point (although this depended on the culture scale, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>). Mycelia were collected by centrifugation, frozen and stored at -70&#x00B0;C for subsequent RNA isolation. RNA was isolated using the procedure described previously by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Moody et al. (2013)</xref>, digested with TURBO DNase I (Invitrogen, United States) and checked for chromosomal DNA contamination using PCR. Ribosomal RNA was removed using Ribo-Zero RNA Removal Kit (Illumina). The construction of strand-specific cDNA libraries, with an average fragment size of 250 bp, and sequencing using the MiSeq kit (Illumina) were performed by the Farncombe Metagenomics Facility at McMaster University (Canada). Paired-end 76-bp reads were subsequently mapped against the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome using Rockhopper software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">McClure et al., 2013</xref>), which enabled the successful alignment of 1.0&#x2013;1.5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>6</sup> reads per sample (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>). Raw data are available at ArrayExpress (EMBL-EBI); accession number E-MTAB-8071 as well as at Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI); accession number GSE132702.</p>
<p>For data visualization, Integrated Genome Viewer (IGV) software was used. The analysis of differentially regulated genes was based on the data generated by Rockhopper software. To calculate the fold change in gene transcription, normalized gene expression (normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression) of the wild type strain under control conditions was divided by normalized gene expression under particular experimental conditions. Subsequently, the log2 value of the fold change was calculated. To minimize the frequency of false-positives, transcripts with a log2 value between -1.5 and 1.5 were eliminated from subsequent analyses, with the exception of NAPs and topoisomerases encoding genes, for which the threshold was based only on the <italic>p</italic>-value significance. The gene distribution analysis was performed by mapping the positions of transcription start points of identified genes or the first gene in a regulated operon determined on the basis of the RNA-Seq data, to the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome. To identify gene clusters of interest, we determined the percent of affected genes within a 250 kbp fragment of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome, subsequently moving the calculation window by 125 kbp in every step. Those regions in which the percentage of affected genes was higher than 5% were classified as supercoiling-sensitive clusters.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Reverse-Transcription and Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)</title>
<p>For RT-qPCR analyses, <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> strains: M145 (wild type), PS04 (with modified TopA level &#x2013; <italic>topA</italic> under <italic>tipA</italic> promoter cloned in pIJ6902 integrative plasmid) and PS08 (wild type with integrated empty pIJ6902 plasmid) were cultivated in liquid 79 medium for 24 h in the presence and absence of inducer. Using the reporter plasmid assay, the DNA supercoiling level in cultures in 79 medium was found to be similar to supercoiling in cultures grown in YEME/TSB medium (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>). RNA from <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> mycelia was isolated using the GeneJET RNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s procedure (except that the concentration of lysozyme in the suspension buffer was increased to 10 mg/ml). The isolated RNA was digested with TURBO DNase I (Invitrogen) to remove traces of chromosomal DNA and then purified and concentrated using the GeneJET RNA Cleanup kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). A total of 500 ng of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using the Maxima First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) in a final volume of 20 &#x03BC;l. The original manufacturer protocol was modified for GC-rich <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> transcripts by increasing the temperature for first-strand synthesis to 65&#x00B0;C and extending the synthesis time up to 30 min. Subsequently, the resulting cDNA was diluted to 100 &#x03BC;L and directly used for quantitative PCRs performed with PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, United States). The relative level of a particular transcript was quantified using the comparative &#x0394;&#x0394;Ct method and the <italic>hrdB</italic> gene as the endogenous control (StepOne Plus real-time PCR system, Applied Biosystems, United States). The optimized oligonucleotides used in this study were synthetized by Sigma-Aldrich (United States), and are listed in the supplementary data (see the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref> &#x201C;<italic>oligonucleotides</italic>&#x201D;).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Analysis of the Promoter AT Content</title>
<p>To estimate the AT content in the promoter regions of novobiocin-induced genes, 66 DNA sequences (960 bp in length) encompassing 750 bp upstream of the translation start codons and 210 bp downstream (960 bp in total) were analyzed. As the control experiments, 66 randomly chosen 750 bp promoter regions with 210 bp intragenic sequence or 66 random <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genomic sequences (each 960 bp in length) were used. Subsequently, we calculated the AT percentage of these sequences in 100-bp windows, with a 1-bp step. The AT content for each window was subsequently plotted against the first nucleotide position of the particular window. The differences in mean AT content calculated for specific nucleotides within the promoter region (in position 340 bp) or the GC-enriched region (in position 660 bp) were tested using the Shapiro&#x2013;Wilk model and <italic>t</italic>-test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec><title>Rapid Loss of Chromosome Supercoiling Positively Regulates <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> Gene Transcription</title>
<p>In previous work, we found that exposing <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> to novobiocin, initially led to the rapid relaxation of DNA, followed by gradual restoration of topological homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>), as had been seen in other bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ferrandiz et al., 2010</xref>). The return to topological balance appeared to stem from changes in the expression of topoisomerase encoding genes, which in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> corresponded to a strong induction of <italic>gyrAB</italic> but only slight inhibition of <italic>topA</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>); this is different from the simultaneous induction of <italic>gyrAB</italic> and inhibition of <italic>topA</italic> transcription observed in other bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Unniraman and Nagaraja, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahmed et al., 2015</xref>). Here, we sought to identify other genes in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> whose transcription was also directly affected by the rapid chromosome relaxation. To this end, we treated <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> liquid cultures with 10 &#x03BC;g/ml novobiocin, which strongly inhibited <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> growth (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). We analyzed the changes in global transcript abundance after 10 min of novobiocin exposure, and compared these with an untreated control strain. Based on previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Gmuender et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>), 10 min of novobiocin exposure was presumed to be sufficient to affect promoters directly sensitive to gyrase inhibition, triggering the primary transcriptional response, but was deemed insufficient time to induce a secondary transcriptional response (which depends on any primary-induced transcriptional regulators).</p>
<p>In analyzing our RNA-Seq data, we found that the rapid DNA relaxation caused by novobiocin (detected using a reporter plasmid) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S5</xref>) led to a 2.71-fold induction of the <italic>gyrBA</italic> operon transcription (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>), confirming that the primary transcriptional response could be induced by 10 min of gyrase inhibition. We next set out to identify genes exhibiting distinct changes in transcription in comparison to the untreated control (at least 2.83-fold), and found 121 genes that were sensitive to the rapid loss of chromosome supercoiling. These genes constitute 1.5% of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> open reading frames (ORFs) (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S2</xref> &#x201C;<italic>novobiocin</italic>&#x201D; for the complete list of the identified genes). Mapping of the transcription start sites (TSSs) of the identified genes to the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome revealed that the novobiocin-sensitive genes were unevenly distributed along the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S6A</xref>). Surprisingly, in contrast to <italic>E. coli</italic>, in which only one third of genes affected by gyrase inhibition were induced and the others were repressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>), in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic>, most of the novobiocin-sensitive genes (117 of 121) were upregulated by chromosome relaxation, with only 4 genes (<italic>sco0498, sco1377, sco3726</italic>, and <italic>sco3918</italic>) being strongly downregulated (log2-fold >1.5).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Identification of novobiocin-sensitive genes in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Analysis of reporter plasmid supercoiling density. The reporter plasmid was isolated from untreated wild type strain (upper panel) and the same strain exposed to novobiocin (10 &#x03BC;g/mL) for 10 min (bottom panel). The most abundant topoisomers identified under each condition are marked with arrows. <bold>(B)</bold> RNA-Seq based <italic>gyrB</italic> expression normalized by the upper quartile, in the untreated wild type strain (gray) and the novobiocin-treated strain [as described for panel <bold>(A)</bold>] (black). <bold>(C)</bold> The chromosomal localization of the novobiocin-sensitive genes. Differentially upregulated (green) and downregulated (red) transcripts in the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> culture following novobiocin exposure (as in panel <bold>A</bold>) were identified using log2-fold changes >1.5; <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C;0.05 thresholds. <bold>(D)</bold> Analysis of the average AT content in the promoter regions of novobiocin-sensitive genes (blue) in comparison to the random promoters (red) and random chromosomal sequences (gray). The transcriptional start site (TSS), promoter region and GC-enriched region identified upstream of novobiocin-sensitive promoters are marked. <bold>(E)</bold> The box plot comparison of AT content within the promoter region (upper panel) and GC-enriched region (bottom panel) of novobiocin-sensitive (blue) and randomly selected (red) promoters. The asterisks indicate the calculated <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C;0.05 (<sup>&#x2217;</sup>) or &#x003C;0.01 (<sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01605-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We speculate that the gene upregulation after novobiocin exposure rather than their transcriptional repression may be due to the high GC content (72%) of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bentley et al., 2002</xref>). In <italic>E. coli</italic>, promoter regions of relaxation-induced genes are notably enriched in AT base pairs, whereas relaxation-repressed promoters have increased GC content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>). In <italic>S. coelicolor</italic>, the increase in GC content in the promoter regions to levels above the average would be expected to result in increased DNA stability, which in turn would inhibit promoter unwinding. Conversely, more AT-rich promoter regions would be expected to favor promoter upregulation. To test this hypothesis, we compared the AT content of 66 novobiocin-induced promoters (the identified 121 genes were recognized as 66 transcriptional units) with the AT content of randomly chosen promoter regions. As predicted, we found that novobiocin-induced genes showed approximately 2&#x2013;3% higher AT content compared with the randomly selected promoters and 8&#x2013;9% higher in comparison to the average of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genome (28%). Notably, the AT-rich region was significantly expanded in the novobiocin-sensitive genes relative to the random promoters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>). Unexpectedly, AT-content analysis revealed a GC-rich region located approximately 100&#x2013;200 bp upstream of the novobiocin-induced genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>), and not the random promoters. The difference in the mean AT-content values between the novobiocin-sensitive and random promoters, calculated for position 340 bp (GC-enriched region) and 660 bp (promoter region) were statistically relevant (<italic>p</italic>-values of 0.006 and 0.017, respectively; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1E</xref>). Interestingly, similar analysis performed in <italic>E. coli</italic> did not indicate the existence of a GC-rich fragment preceding the relaxation-induced genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>), although the significance of the GC-enriched region upstream of the <italic>Streptomyces</italic> novobiocin-inducible promoters is currently unclear.</p>
<p>Among the 121 novobiocin-sensitive genes, 15 encoded putative regulatory proteins, including the anti-sigma factor RsfA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Homerova et al., 2000</xref>), the developmental regulator WblC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Fowler-Goldsworthy et al., 2011</xref>), and the secondary metabolism regulator NsdB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Zhang et al., 2007</xref>). Interestingly, a high fraction of the novobiocin-sensitive genes (&#x223C;30%) encode proteins involved in either antibiotic production (10 genes, including the actinorhodin activator <italic>sco5085/actII-orf4</italic> and genes within the coelibactin biosynthetic cluster <italic>sco7681-sco7688</italic>) or putative membrane transporters (at least 25 genes) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). This suggests that rapid chromosome relaxation functions as the stress signal that triggers the transcription of genes whose products are involved in stress adaptation (i.e., those encoding regulatory proteins) and/or interspecies competition. Considering that decreased gyrase activity and rapid chromosome relaxation may result from exposure to different cell membrane destabilizing agents that affect transmembrane potential and ATP synthesis, or other biologically active molecules produced by competing bacterial species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Prakash et al., 2009</xref>), it is conceivable that the intrinsic response to such agents should encompass the induction of transport proteins that should restore homeostasis to the intracellular environment and/or function to eliminate toxic compounds.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Selected novobiocin-induced genes encoding transporters or transcriptional regulators (based on RNA-Seq data; log2-fold >1.5; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Transporters</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco0623</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Membrane transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2310</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Integral membrane efflux protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2763</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABC transporter ATP-binding protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2896/sco2895/sco2894</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/7/6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.09/2.51/2.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Possible ABC transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3206</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transmembrane efflux protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3331</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transmembrane transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3455</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABC transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4031</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Integral membrane transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ragA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4075</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABC transporter ATP-binding protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5451</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABC transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5957</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco6720</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ABC transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Regulators</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ssgG</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2924</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Putative regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2964</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LysR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4032</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MarR regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rsfA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4677</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>wblC</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5190</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">164</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA-binding protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>nsdB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7252</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">118</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Antibiotic synthesis</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>actII-4</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5085</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actinorhodin cluster activator protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7221</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Polyketide synthase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7681&#x2013;sco7688</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6&#x2013;17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58&#x2013;2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Coelibactin synthesis genes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Other genes</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rpmG</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco0570</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50S ribosomal protein L33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>tuf3</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1321</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Elongation factor Tu</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2171</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Putative secreted protease</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ohrA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2986</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3425</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30S ribosomal protein S18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4316</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP/GTP-binding protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4449</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hydrolase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>lon</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5285</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent protease</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In summary, a significant fraction of novobiocin-sensitive genes encompassed those encoding membrane transporters, antibiotic synthesis and regulatory proteins. The novobiocin-sensitive genes were non-uniformly distributed along the chromosome, and most of them were upregulated. The upregulation was reflected by the increased AT-content of their promoter regions and the presence of an upstream GC-rich DNA stretch.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Long-Term Exposure to Topological Imbalance Globally Affects Gene Transcription</title>
<p>Having established that approximately 120 genes were directly impacted by gyrase inhibition, we were next interested in assessing the response of <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> to the long-term effects of altered chromosome supercoiling. To date, there is little understood about the long-term effects of altered supercoiling, since most studied bacteria were able to quickly restore topological homeostasis. Moreover, the effects of increased negative supercoiling on global gene transcription in bacteria remain relatively unexplored, in part due to the limited availability of selective TopA inhibitors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Garcia et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cheng et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Godbole et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Szafran et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>To investigate long terms effects of supercoiling imbalance, we took advantage of a <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> strain (PS04) that had been engineered such that chromosome supercoiling could be modulated by tuning TopA levels using a thiostrepton-inducible <italic>topA</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>). In this PS04 strain, TopA depletion (no induction) dramatically increased the overall negative DNA supercoiling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S5A,B</xref>), but TopA levels could not be restored, thus impeding the restoration of supercoiling balance. Moreover, inefficient repression of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> gyrase operon eliminated another possible pathway to restoring chromosomal topological balance in the TopA-depleted strain. On the other hand induction of <italic>topA</italic> expression in the PS04 strain led only to a slight (approximately 22%) increase of TopA protein levels which also corresponded to a modest shift in global DNA supercoiling levels if compared to the wild type strain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S5</xref>). This observation is in agreement with our previous data showing that by increasing the concentration of <italic>topA</italic> inducer, only a 25% increase in TopA levels could be achieved (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>). This may be partially explained by induction of the <italic>gyrBA</italic> operon, which could compensate for high levels of TopA, and restore the supercoiling balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>) or by posttranscriptional regulation mechanisms of <italic>topA</italic> gene expression.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>The transcriptional response to long-term supercoiling imbalance. <bold>(A)</bold> The supercoiling density analysis of the reporter plasmid isolated from the wild type strain (upper panel), the <italic>topA</italic>-upregulated strain (middle panel), and the <italic>topA</italic>-downregulated strain (lower panel). The most abundant topoisomers under each condition are marked with arrows. <bold>(B)</bold> Differentially regulated genes identified using RNA-Seq following <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation (left) and <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation (right). The up- (black) or downregulated (gray) genes were grouped according to the magnitude of their transcriptional changes compared to the wild type strain (log2-fold change value). <bold>(C)</bold> Comparison of the number of genes specifically affected by <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation and <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation, and those common to both conditions.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01605-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>First, we compared the number of <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genes that were strongly affected by <italic>topA</italic>-down- or upregulation (cultivation in the absence or presence of 1 &#x03BC;g/ml thiostrepton). We identified 552 genes whose transcription was changed by <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation and 214 genes altered by the induction of <italic>topA</italic> transcription (at least 2.83-fold change; log2-fold >1.5), which corresponded to 7.0 and 2.7% of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> predicted coding sequences, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>; see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S3</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">S4</xref> &#x201C;<italic>topA-downregulation</italic>,&#x201D; &#x201C;<italic>topA-upregulation</italic>&#x201D; for the complete list of affected genes). Notably, most of the identified ORFs were positively regulated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>), and the positive effect on gene transcription was particularly pronounced following <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation. These observations corroborate the notion that chromosome relaxation preferentially promoted the induction of gene transcription in GC-rich bacteria. Surprisingly, a significant number of genes were sensitive to both changes in supercoiling conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). Nevertheless, a substantial fraction of genes responded specifically to an increase of negative supercoiling resulting from TopA depletion (408 of 552, more than 70%), whereas <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation regulated specifically only 32% (70 of 214) of identified genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). The observed difference in the number of the supercoiling sensitive genes (SSGs), as well as their specificity for particular supercoiling conditions, may be presumably explained by the scale of topological imbalance, which is more pronounced under the former than under the latter conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S5</xref>). However, our results also show that, even though the topological balance was only slightly distorted following <italic>topA</italic> induction, the transcription of a relatively high number of genes was still affected, suggesting the presence of a mechanism(s) that maintains a modified level of gene transcription. Markedly, similar observations were made recently for <italic>S. pneumoniae</italic> transcriptional activity of genes under TopA inhibition conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ferrandiz et al., 2016</xref>), where the expression of many genes was specifically altered. Interestingly, the inhibition of TopA in <italic>S. pneumoniae</italic> (which was followed by restoring of supercoiling imbalance) affected only 2% of the genome, while long term TopA depletion in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> had a more pronounced effect on the gene transcription. Interestingly, the genes affected by long-term supercoiling changes only partially overlapped with those that were novobiocin-sensitive (12% of novobiocin-affected genes, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS5">Supplementary Table S5</xref>), suggesting that long-term rearrangement of bacterial chromosome topology provokes a global change in gene transcription and includes primary and secondary response pathways.</p>
<p>Overall, we observed that a persistent supercoiling imbalance induced by a constitutive change of TopA expression, affected the transcription of approximately 3&#x2013;7% of <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genes. A significant subfraction of these were sensitive to any supercoiling imbalance, suggesting shared transcriptional response pathway(s). Our results suggest that the response to topological imbalance depends on accessible pathways of supercoiling restoration, being the most pronounced when topoisomerase gene expression cannot not be readjusted.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Long-Term Supercoiling Imbalance Impacts the Expression of Discrete Gene Clusters</title>
<p>Remarkably, supercoiling sensitive genes whose transcription was affected by long-term topological imbalance were non-uniformly distributed along the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome, similar to genes induced in the novobiocin-treated cells whose distribution also was non-uniform. SSGs induced by <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation or <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation showed characteristic grouping, suggesting they were organized into supercoiling-sensitive clusters, which were in turn separated by supercoiling insensitive regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). To quantify these observations, we calculated the percentage of genes affected by different supercoiling conditions within 250 kbp chromosome regions along the whole chromosome. We found that gene clustering was strongly detectable under <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation conditions, with 6&#x2013;7 chromosomal regions containing more than 5% of genes affected negatively or positively in each cluster (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). Notably, those clusters containing the positively and negatively regulated genes partially overlapped, further supporting the existence of DNA domains that are particularly sensitive to changes in DNA supercoiling. Interestingly, gene clustering was also detectable, although less pronounced, under <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation conditions, where the distribution of the supercoiling-sensitive regions along the chromosome was comparable to that observed in the TopA-depleted strain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S6B</xref>). Analogous clustering of SSGs has been described previously for <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>S. pneumoniae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ferrandiz et al., 2016</xref>). Collectively, these observations suggest that the organization of SSGs into topologically separated domains is a feature conserved among bacteria, presumably ensuring the coordinated expression of the associated genes. Remarkably, the loci of the genes affected by topological imbalance showed increased density in the central part of the chromosome, however, the initiation of the chromosomal replication region (<italic>oriC</italic>) was found to be outside the identified SSG clusters, and the <italic>oriC</italic> proximal genes, which predominantly encode proteins involved in DNA replication, were insensitive to the changes in chromosome supercoiling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Surprisingly, the genes and genes clusters that were affected by long-term supercoiling modification did not overlap with those induced by novobiocin (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figures S6A,B</xref>). Presumably during long-term DNA relaxation, the first response genes are no longer activated and the affected genes include those of the pathways responsible for constitutive maintenance of cell homeostasis under such conditions.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Identification of long-term supercoiling imbalance-sensitive clusters. <bold>(A)</bold> The chromosomal positions of differentially upregulated (green) and downregulated (red) transcripts identified in the <italic>topA</italic>-downregulated strain (upper panel) and <italic>topA</italic>-upregulated strain (lower panel). The positions of the <italic>oriC</italic> region and the supercoiling-hypersensitive cluster (SHC) are marked in gray. <bold>(B)</bold> Identification of supercoiling-sensitive clusters. The percent of genes affected by <italic>topA</italic> downregulation (upper panel) or <italic>topA</italic> upregulation (lower panel) was calculated in a 250-kbp window and the mid of the window was plotted versus chromosome position. The regions with the percentage of upregulated (green) or downregulated (red) genes higher than 5% (supercoiling-sensitive clusters) are marked at the bottom of the plot.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01605-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Interestingly, among several identified gene clusters impacted by supercoiling imbalance, one cluster was particularly enriched in SSGs, which constituted &#x223C;20% of all genes positioned within the 250 kbp region. Closer examination of this region revealed that 26 out of 34 genes within 30 kbp (between <italic>sco4667</italic> and <italic>sco4700</italic>) were supercoiling sensitive. We therefore termed this region the supercoiling-hypersensitive cluster (SHC). Most of the SHC genes encoded products of unassigned function and these genes themselves were poorly transcribed under standard culture conditions. However, they were strongly upregulated under both <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation and <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). We confirmed these observations using RT-qPCR for the first (<italic>sco4667</italic>) and one before last (<italic>sco4699</italic>) genes of the SHC region and excluded the effect of growth medium or genetic modifications in the <italic>topA</italic> depleted PS04 strain (the integration of pIJ6902 plasmid, that contains <italic>topA</italic> gene under <italic>tipA</italic> promoter), by measuring the relative transcript level in PS04 and control strain (wild type with empty pIJ602 plasmid) cultures grown in liquid 79 medium. The transcription of both genes appeared to be highly dependent on the level of TopA: significantly increased when TopA was depleted, decreased when TopA was at the wild type level, and increased slightly again at <italic>topA</italic> induction (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S6C</xref>). These results were further supported by the observation that SHC genes upregulation was correlated with relative degree of topological imbalance. However, since we did not observe increased expression of the genes in the SHC region following a 10 min exposure to novobiocin (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S6D</xref>), we speculate that their activation requires not only a supercoiling imbalance, but also the activity of other factors.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Transcription of genes in the SHC region at constitutive <italic>topA</italic>-down- or upregulation (based on RNA-Seq data).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4667</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system sensor kinase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4668</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system response regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4669</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4670</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine protease</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4671</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LysR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4672</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4673</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DeoR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4674</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4675</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4676</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>rsfA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4677</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4678</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">197</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4679</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">530</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4680</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">116</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA-binding protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4681</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">137</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Short chain dehydrogenase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4682</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">167</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tautomerase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>gdhA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4683</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">212</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glutamate dehydrogenase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>scoF3</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4684</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3087</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cold shock protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4685</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DEAD/DEATH box helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4686</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4687</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">674</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4688</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">137</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4689</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">345</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4690</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">148</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4691</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4692</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">142</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4693</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4694</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4695</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4696</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4697</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4698</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">IS1652 transposase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4699</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rhs protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4700</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypothetical protein</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The SHC genes include those encoding a putative two-component system (<italic>sco4667</italic> and <italic>sco4668</italic>) genes organized in a single operon and additional two putative transcriptional regulator-encoding genes positioned upstream (<italic>sco4671</italic> and <italic>sco4673</italic>). The cluster also encompasses genes whose products may contribute to DNA/RNA transactions, including: putative DNA helicase (<italic>sco4685</italic>), transposase (<italic>sco4698</italic>), and a homolog of <italic>E. coli</italic> Rhs protein (<italic>rearrangement hotspot protein</italic>), which putatively contains the C-terminal toxin domain and is involved in bacterial intercellular competition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Koskiniemi et al., 2013</xref>). When we compared the genes in this region to other <italic>Streptomyces</italic> species, we found the synteny was not strong, perhaps suggesting that some of these genes may have been acquired through horizontal transfer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Hindra et al., 2014</xref>). However, the AT content of the SHC region was not significantly different from the rest of <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S7</xref>). On the other hand, it has been shown that mobile elements tend to be sensitive to changes in chromosome topology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Lodge and Berg, 1990</xref>). Indeed, among 552 genes affected by TopA depletion conditions, we found 16 genes (2.9% of SSGs) encoded putative transposable elements (which constitute only 0.7% of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genome; see the complete list in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Tables S2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S4</xref>). Why these mobile elements, and more broadly, the genes in the SHC, are specifically subject to topological control, remains an interesting question to address.</p>
<p>In summary, as in other bacteria, in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome, there are supercoiling sensitive domains that could be detected. They may constitute the regions of chromosomes particularly prone to changes of supercoiling and/or may be regulated by supercoiling sensitive transcriptional regulators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Long-Term Topological Imbalance Affects the Transcription of Genes Encoding Topology-Controlling Proteins</title>
<p>Since topological homeostasis could not be restored in the TopA-depleted <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> PS04 strain, either by induction of the <italic>topA</italic> promoter or by <italic>gyrBA</italic> silencing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>), we predicted that the resulting increase in DNA supercoiling may promote changes in the level of NAPs to compensate for the changes in chromosome topology. According to previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bradshaw et al., 2013</xref>) some NAPs such as HupA are present at high levels during wild type <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> vegetative growth. Based on RNA-Seq data we confirmed that under standard growth conditions, many NAP genes, including <italic>hupA, ssbA, lsr2, sihf</italic>, and <italic>hupS</italic> were highly transcribed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>), while other sporulation and/or stress responsive genes like <italic>dpsB, dpsC</italic>, and <italic>ssbB</italic>, were poorly transcribed. Next, we assessed the impact of the chromosome supercoiling changes on the expression of these genes.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>The topological imbalance-induced transcriptional response of the genes encoding chromosome organizing proteins. <bold>(A)</bold> RNA-Seq based expression of the genes encoding DNA-organizing proteins (gray) and topoisomerases (black) in the wild type <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> strain normalized by the upper quartile. The error bars correspond to standard deviations calculated for four independent biological replicates. <bold>(B)</bold> RNA-Seq analysis of the relative transcriptional response of genes encoding DNA-organizing proteins under <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation conditions. The expression level of particular genes in the wild type strain was estimated as 1. <bold>(C)</bold> The relative transcription of selected genes in the TopA-depleted and control wild type strains calculated using RT-qPCR analysis. <bold>(D)</bold> RT-qPCR comparison of non-uniform <italic>topA</italic> gene transcription under different concentrations of <italic>topA</italic> inducer using oligonucleotide pairs specific for particular transcript regions. The transcript enrichment of particular regions was normalized by the expression of the <italic>hrdB</italic> gene which served as the endogenous control and compared to the wild type strain, in which transcription was estimated as 1. The amplified regions of the <italic>topA</italic> gene (1 &#x2013; white; 2 &#x2013; gray, and 3 &#x2013; black) are shown above.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01605-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Following TopA-depletion (conditions of increased negative supercoiling), we observed transcript levels of DNA-organizing proteins to be statistically different (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). Of the NAPs affected by changes in chromosome topology, <italic>hupA</italic> and <italic>hupS</italic> were amongst the most impacted. Notably, however, the transcriptional effects were in opposite directions: <italic>hupA</italic> transcript levels increased to 1.44 relative to wild type conditions, while <italic>hupS</italic> transcript levels decreased to 0.76 compared with wild type (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). To assess whether these effects were growth medium-specific, and to confirm the supercoiling dependence of these two HU-encoding genes, we grew the wild type and the PS04 strains in the 79 medium, and using RT-qPCR compared their expression under a range of <italic>topA</italic> induction conditions. As before, we observed <italic>hupA</italic> upregulation and <italic>hupS</italic> downregulation following TopA depletion if when compared to the wild type levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>). Previous work has suggested that HupS functions primarily during <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> sporulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Salerno et al., 2009</xref>); however, both HU homologs, HupS and HupA, were shown to be present during <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> vegetative growth, although their levels are unequal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bradshaw et al., 2013</xref>) (our transcriptional analysis showed that <italic>hupA</italic> transcript levels are over 14 times higher than the <italic>hupS</italic> transcripts). Our observations suggest that both <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> HU homologs contribute to the adjustment to altered supercoiling conditions. In <italic>E. coli</italic> two HU homologs, HupA and HupB form homo- and heterodimers at different growth stages, with the heterodimer having a crucial role when the culture reaches stationary phase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Claret and Rouviere-Yaniv, 1997</xref>). Furthermore, DNA supercoiling influences <italic>hupB</italic> transcription in mycobacteria, and its product affects TopA activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ghosh et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Guha et al., 2018</xref>), suggesting that cooperation interactions between the HU proteins and TopA may be conserved in bacteria.</p>
<p>In addition to the effects on <italic>hupA</italic> and <italic>hupS</italic>, increased chromosome supercoiling also profoundly affected the transcription (based on RNA-Seq data) of <italic>dpsA</italic> (decreased to 0.53 of wild type levels), <italic>smc</italic> (increased to 1.53 of wild type levels) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>) and two genes (<italic>parC</italic> and <italic>parE</italic>) encoding topoisomerase IV subunits (increased to 1.86 and 1.67 of wild type levels, respectively). Using RT-qPCR, we confirmed upregulation of <italic>parC, parE</italic>, and <italic>smc</italic> genes. Similar observations have been made in <italic>E. coli</italic>, where increases in negative supercoiling result in the induction of <italic>mukBEF</italic> expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>), where these genes encode homologs of SMC. Additionally, it is conceivable, that upregulating the expression of <italic>parC</italic> and <italic>parE</italic> (topoisomerase IV) may partially complement the effects of TopA depletion. However, the changes in <italic>dpsA</italic> transcription were not confirmed using RT-qPCR in cultures grown in different medium than used for our RNA-Seq experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B,C</xref>). Since we did not observe any difference in DNA supercoiling (based on reporter plasmid assays, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>) in cultures growing in 79 or YEME/TSB medium, a possible explanation for this observation could be that <italic>dpsA</italic> transcription is affected by DNA supercoiling but only under osmotic stress conditions (in the YEME/TSB medium used in RNA-Seq experiment but not in 79 medium used for the RT-qPCR experiments) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Facey et al., 2009</xref>). Whether and how the changes in expression of genes encoding DNA organizing proteins influence chromosome topology have yet to be determined.</p>
<p>Next, we assessed the effect of elevated <italic>topA</italic> expression (15&#x2013;25&#x00D7; higher transcript levels compared with levels in the wild type strain). As mentioned, these increased <italic>topA</italic> transcript levels were not correlated with increased TopA protein whose levels were elevated only 22% in comparison with the wild type strain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Szafran et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S5A</xref>), thus only slightly affecting DNA supercoiling. Based on that observation, we speculated that TopA may be regulated posttranscriptionally and/or posttranslationally (e.g., may be subject to transcript processing or specific protein degradation). Indeed, while <italic>topA</italic> transcript levels were uniformly distributed along the 2858 bp <italic>topA</italic> gene in the wild type and the <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation strain), <italic>topA</italic> induction considerably increased the fraction of reads mapping to the beginning (region 1) but not to middle (region 2) or end (region 3) of the <italic>topA</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S8</xref>). The non-uniform <italic>topA</italic> transcript levels were confirmed using RT-qPCR with specific oligonucleotides complementary to distinct fragments of the <italic>topA</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). Interestingly, in the closely related <italic>M. smegmatis</italic>, gyrase binds within the <italic>topA</italic> promoter region, preventing its transcription (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahmed et al., 2015</xref>), thus, similar mechanism of <italic>topA</italic> regulation in <italic>Streptomyces</italic> cannot be excluded. On the other hand, the possibility that <italic>topA</italic> transcripts are also subject to posttranscriptional processing and/or mRNA degradation could also explain the non-uniform detection of the particular <italic>topA</italic> transcript regions.</p>
<p>In summary, the increased level of negative DNA supercoiling induces the coordinated modification of topoisomerases and NAPs level, presumably in an attempt to counteract the topological imbalance. Among them, the HupA protein may play a crucial role in maintaining nucleoid architecture under TopA depletion; with potential contributions from topoisomerase IV (ParCE) and downregulation of HupS &#x2013; the other HU homolog present in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>. Intriguingly, <italic>topA</italic> induction had little effect on global DNA supercoiling, as <italic>Streptomyces</italic> appear to have mechanisms in place to ensure TopA levels are maintained below a certain threshold, through possible autoregulatory control.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Alternating <italic>topA</italic> Transcript Levels Stimulates the Expression of DNA Damage Response Genes</title>
<p>Chromosome regulation stemming from gyrase inhibition with novobiocin had an immediate impact on 1.5% of the genes in the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> chromosome. Conversely, the long-term severe alteration of <italic>topA</italic> levels during <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> growth resulted in more prominent changes in global genes transcription affecting up to 7% of the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> genome. Interestingly, among the genes affected by severe depletion or modest increase in TopA levels we identified genes whose transcription was modified under both conditions.</p>
<p>Among the genes sensitive to any alteration of TopA levels, 14 regulatory protein-encoding genes were identified (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>), including the four regulators in the SHC region [<italic>sco4667</italic> (sensor kinase), <italic>sco4668</italic> (regulatory protein), and putative transcriptional regulators (<italic>sco4671</italic> and <italic>sco4673</italic>)]. Outside of this region was <italic>sco5803</italic>, which encodes the LexA repressor that controls the DNA damage response (highly induced by <italic>topA</italic>-up- and downregulation). In <italic>E. coli</italic>, the LexA-regulon encompasses at least 31 genes, including <italic>recA</italic> and <italic>lexA</italic> (the latter being negatively autoregulated), <italic>uvrA, ftsK, polB, dinF</italic>, and <italic>dnaE2</italic>, alongside others involved in the DNA damage response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fernandez De Henestrosa et al., 2000</xref>). We found that the transcription of <italic>recA, recX, dnaE2, dinP</italic>, or <italic>uvrA</italic> genes, which presumably belong to the LexA-regulon in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic>, based on the predicted binding consensus sequence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Novichkov et al., 2013</xref>), were similarly affected by changes in chromosome supercoiling. This implies that the entire LexA regulon was impacted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Tables 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>), although the RT-qPCR analysis indicated that in 79 medium, this induction was less pronounced (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Figure S9</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>The regulators encoding genes affected by both constitutive <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation and <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation (based on RNA-Seq data; log2-fold >1.5; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>Regulators</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3435</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4214</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2429</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-6.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-6.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">AbaA-like regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>xlnR</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4215</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">820</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GntR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4671</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LysR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4673</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DeoR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5656</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2804</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>lexA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5803</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">240</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LexA repressor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>nsdB</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7252</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">118</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>TCSs</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4667</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system sensor kinase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4668</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system response regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>Proteases</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lon</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5285</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent protease</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>GNATs</bold></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1624</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2379</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>desC</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2784</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">285</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>DNA processing and DNA repair genes impacted by constitutive <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation (based on RNA-Seq data; log2-fold >1.5; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dnaE2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1739</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase III subunit alpha</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dinP</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1738</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase IV</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1767</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA hydrolase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1827</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase III subunit epsilon</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>uvrA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1958</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Exconuclease ABC subunit A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1969</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA-methyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2863</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3434</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4685</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DEAD/DEAH box helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>xseA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5056</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Exodeoxyribonuclease VII large subunit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5183</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent DNA helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5184</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent DNA helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>recX</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5770</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">136</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Recombination regulator RecX</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>recA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">sco5769</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">426</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Recombinase A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>lexA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5803</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">240</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LexA repressor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5920</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DEAD/DEAH box helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco6719</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UvrA-like ABC transporter</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7522</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA ligase</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption><p>DNA processing and DNA repair genes impacted by constitutive <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation (based on RNA-Seq data; log2-fold >1.5; p &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dinP</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1738</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase IV</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>dnaE2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1739</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase III subunit alpha</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1767</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">122</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA hydrolase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>uvrA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1958</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Excinuclease ABC subunit A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3434</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA polymerase I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3798</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chromosome condensation protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4685</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DEAD/DEAH box helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5761</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent DNA helicase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>recA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5769</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">426</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Recombinase A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>recX</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5770</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">136</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Recombination regulator RecX</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>lexA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5803</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">240</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LexA repressor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7522</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNA ligase</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The identification of putative LexA-dependent genes among the genes upregulated when <italic>topA</italic> transcription was altered may suggest that these conditions trigger the LexA-dependent DNA repair pathway. However, the mechanism of LexA regulon induction by altered chromosome supercoiling remains speculative. We assume that in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, as in other bacteria, LexA activity is controlled by RecA, which in the presence of ssDNA and in an ATP-dependent manner stimulates the self-cleavage of LexA, resulting in derepression of the LexA regulon. It is conceivable that changes in chromosome topology alter LexA binding to DNA, or that the formation of single-stranded DNA patches upon depleting TopA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Parsa et al., 2012</xref>) promote RecA-dependent cleavage of LexA and de-repression of LexA-regulated genes. However, the latter possibility could not account for the release of LexA repression during chromosome relaxation and further studies are required to understand the mechanism underlying LexA regulation in response to supercoiling changes. Since DNA damage is frequently accompanied by changes in local chromosome architecture, it is possible that changes in chromosome supercoiling may be sensed as a sign of DNA damage, leading to the induction of DNA repair genes. Interestingly, in <italic>Corynebacterium glutamicum</italic>, an actinobacterial relative of <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, induction of the DNA repair pathway was associated with the inhibition of cell division, which could explain the inhibition of sporulation seen for the <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> TopA-depleted strain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Ogino et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Since we did not identify LexA-regulon members among novobiocin-sensitive genes, we speculate that the DNA repair response may be a result of long-term exposure to topological imbalance. Thus, topological imbalance, if cannot be compensated by response pathways, could serve as a marker of DNA damage.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Developmental Transcriptional Regulators Are Sensitive to Specific Supercoiling Conditions</title>
<p>Although <italic>topA</italic> downregulation and <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation induced a common transcriptional response, a significant fraction of the affected genes responded specifically to particular supercoiling conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). We identified 12 SSGs-encoding regulatory proteins that were affected specifically by <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref>). These numbers are similar to those induced by novobiocin treatment, but surprisingly, the sets of genes identified in both experiments did not overlap (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS5">Supplementary Table S5</xref>). Amongst the many uncharacterized genes that were sensitive to <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation, developmental regulators such as <italic>sigF</italic> (upregulated) and <italic>nsdA</italic> (downregulated) were identified; however, these changes in expression were not associated with any obvious phenotype for the <italic>topA</italic> up-regulated strain.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption><p>Regulatory protein-encoding genes impacted by constitutive <italic>topA</italic>-upregulation (based on RNA-Seq data; log2-fold >1.5; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Log2-fold change</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>Regulators</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco0140</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MerR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2865</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">154</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sigF</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4035</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA polymerase sigma factor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4102</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MerR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5025</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5437</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MerR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>nsdA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5582</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5962</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco6520</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA polymerase sigma factor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7530</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7698</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MerR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>TCSs</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>cutS</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5863</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">116</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component sensor kinase</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The increased chromosome supercoiling resulting from TopA depletion specifically influenced a substantial number of genes encoding regulatory proteins. Among 35 of the TopA depletion-sensitive genes, we identified 18 putative transcriptional regulators, including seven genes encoding TCSs (kinases and/or their putative phosphorylation targets), six genes encoding putative acetyltransferases (GNATs family) and four genes encoding subunits of regulatory Clp proteases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">Table 8</xref>), alongside the sporulation-specific sigma factor encoding <italic>whiG</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption><p>Regulatory genes affected by <italic>topA</italic>-downregulation (based on RNA-Seq data; log2-fold >1.5; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Gene</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Locus</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Normalized expression in the wild type<sup>&#x2217;</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Log2-fold change</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>Regulators</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco0132</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco0204</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1059</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LuxR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1104</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TetR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1736</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MarR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2223</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TetR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4059</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4375</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MarR family regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5323</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator AsnC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5418</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>whiG</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5621</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RNA polymerase sigma factor WhiG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5840</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco6299</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">TetR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco6664</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7014</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LacI family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7042</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">114</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MarR family transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7270</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7639</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MarR family regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7727</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">MarR family regulatory protein</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>TCSs</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>ohkA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1596</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component sensor kinase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>abrA2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1745</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system response regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3144</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system response regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco3818</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">179</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system response transcriptional regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4362</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two component system sensor kinase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5455</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system response regulator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7649</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Two-component system sensor kinase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>Proteases</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>clpP2</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2618</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2584</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>clpP1</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2619</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3091</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>clpA</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco6408</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-1.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clp protease ATP-binding subunit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>clpP4</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7280</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="4"><bold>GNATs</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco1563</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2227</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco2876</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco4050</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">-2.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco5228</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>sco7447</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetyltransferase</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>&#x2217;</sup>Normalization by the upper quartile of gene expression.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The gene encoding the sigma factor WhiG was one of the most significantly upregulated regulatory genes under TopA depletion based on RNA-Seq results (over 21-fold induction; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">Table 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). RT-qPCR confirmed that <italic>whiG</italic> transcription was stimulated by increased DNA supercoiling and decreased to wild type levels upon induction of normal <italic>topA</italic> transcription (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>); although the calculated fold-change was lower, probably due to detection of a small amount of <italic>whiG</italic> transcript in the wild type strain growing in 79 medium. WhiG is typically expressed at low levels during vegetative growth and is involved in the regulatory cascade that governs <italic>Streptomyces</italic> sporulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Kelemen et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Elliot et al., 2001</xref>). Since WhiG directs the expression of the <italic>whiI</italic> and <italic>whiH</italic> genes, but does not affect the transcription of other <italic>whi</italic>-family regulators, such as <italic>whiA</italic> and <italic>whiB</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Mendez and Chater, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chater et al., 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Ryding et al., 1998</xref>), we analyzed the transcriptional response of these genes to increased DNA supercoiling. As expected, the transcription of both <italic>whiI</italic> and <italic>whiH</italic> was elevated following TopA depletion (although they were not identified in the initial screening due to below-threshold <italic>q</italic>-values, however, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001 was still statistically relevant), suggesting the induction of a WhiG-dependent regulatory cascade by changes in chromosome supercoiling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). In <italic>S. coelicolor whiG</italic> was shown to belong to the BldD-regulon, which also encompasses <italic>bldN, bldM</italic>, and <italic>whiB</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Elliot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">den Hengst et al., 2010</xref>). In fact, in <italic>S. venezuelae</italic>, the <italic>whiG</italic> gene was shown to be directly repressed by BldD, the master regulator that binds to DNA upon association with c-di-GMP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Tschowri et al., 2014</xref>). This prompted us to test whether increased DNA supercoiling influenced the transcription of other BldD-dependent genes. Indeed, upon TopA depletion, we observed high upregulation of three BldD targets: <italic>bldM, bldN</italic>, and <italic>whiG</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). The mechanism of supercoiling-dependent upregulation of the BldD-regulon may, similar to that proposed for LexA, result from decreased BldD DNA-binding affinity during higher DNA supercoiling. Thus, alleviating BldD binding during times of increased DNA supercoiling could lead to increased target gene transcription.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Topoisomerase I depletion-induced changes in the transcription of genes involved in sporulation regulatory cascades. <bold>(A)</bold> RNA-Seq based expression of selected genes encoding for <italic>whi</italic> and <italic>bld</italic> regulatory cascades genes normalized by the upper quartile in the wild type strain (black) and the TopA-depleted strain (red). The genes belonging to the BldD regulon are marked with arrows. The statistically significant changes in transcript levels were marked with asterisks (<sup>&#x2217;</sup><italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C;0.05; <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C;0.001). <italic>p</italic>-Values were calculated based on RNA-Seq data analysis for four independent biological replicates for the wild type and <italic>topA</italic>-downregulated strains. <bold>(B)</bold> RT-qPCR analysis of <italic>whiG</italic> transcript levels at different concentrations of the <italic>topA</italic> gene inducer. Wild type levels of <italic>whiG</italic> transcription were set at 1, and standard deviation for wild type transcription is marked with a gray bar. The inset shows RT-qPCR analysis of <italic>whiG</italic> transcript levels in the TopA-depleted and the wild type strains, as well as the control strain that contained the pIJ6902 plasmid without the <italic>topA</italic> gene. The <italic>whiG</italic> transcript enrichment was normalized by the expression of the <italic>hrdB</italic> gene which served as the endogenous control and compared to the wild type strain in which transcription was estimated as 1.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-10-01605-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Remarkably, even though elevated supercoiling induced key sporulation genes including <italic>whiG</italic>, their induction did not lead to sporulation; in fact, the TopA-depleted strain fails to form spores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Szafran et al., 2013</xref>). This may indicate either a lack of additional regulators needed for differentiation, or the activity of other signaling pathways that prevent sporulation (e.g., the DNA damage response, as described for RecA/LexA above). The observed induction of sporulation cascades does, however, suggest that DNA topology may function as a global regulator that triggers sporulation cascades either in response to environmental stress or physiological conditions that induce increased DNA supercoiling.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Summary</title>
<p>Topological imbalance has profound effects on gene transcription in all bacteria; however, different organisms evoke distinct responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Gmuender et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Peter et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ferrandiz et al., 2010</xref>). We showed here that in <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> supercoiling-sensitive genes are organized in discrete clusters, a feature that seems to be a conserved strategy for topological regulation among many bacteria. Supercoiling imbalance triggers the activation of genes involved in stress responses, including DNA repair pathway, transmembrane transporters and chaperonins, as well as genes involved in the production of secondary metabolites. Both increased and decreased DNA supercoiling appear to have been detected as signals of DNA damage, inducing DNA repair genes and oxidative stress response genes. The long-term response to supercoiling imbalance is based on the activation of the set of primary and downstream regulatory proteins. Sporulation is triggered under stress conditions in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, and accordingly, we found that several differentiation-regulating genes are affected by DNA supercoiling. In general, topology-governed regulons are expected to rely on the supercoiling-dependent binding of various regulatory proteins to DNA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Data Availability</title>
<p>Raw data are available at ArrayExpress (EMBL-EBI); accession number <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="E-MTAB-8071">E-MTAB-8071</ext-link> as well as at Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI); accession number <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="GSE132702">GSE132702</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>MS designed and performed the research, carried out data analysis, manuscript preparation and correction, and acquired partial funding. MG was responsible for scientific consultation, data analysis and interpretation, and critical revision. TM was responsible for software development. ME was responsible for scientific consultation, critical revision, and acquired partial funding. DJ was responsible for scientific consultation, manuscript preparation and correction, and acquired partial funding.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This study was supported by the National Science Center, Poland: OPUS grant 2014/15/NZ2/01067 to DJ, HARMONIA grant 2016/22/NZ1/00122 to MS, PRELUDIUM grant 2016//23/N/NZ2/01169 to MG, and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR-PJT-162340) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC-RGPIN-2015-04681) to ME.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>We thank Dr. Govind Chandra for analysis of SHC cluster synteny.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01605/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01605/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.xlsx" id="TS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.xlsx" id="TS2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.xlsx" id="TS3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.xlsx" id="TS4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_5.pdf" id="TS5" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karthik</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Autoregulation of topoisomerase I expression by supercoiling sensitive transcription.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>1541</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkv1088</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26496944</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aldridge</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Facey</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Francis</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bayliss</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Del Sol</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dyson</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A novel bifunctional histone protein in Streptomyces: a candidate for structural coupling between DNA conformation and transcription during development and stress?</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>4813</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4824</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkt180</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23525459</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baaklini</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usongo</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nolent</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanscartier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hraiky</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drlica</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Hypernegative supercoiling inhibits growth by causing RNA degradation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>190</volume> <fpage>7346</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7356</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00680-08</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18790862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bentley</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cerde&#x00F1;o-T&#x00E1;rraga</surname> <given-names>A.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Challis</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomson</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>James</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>417</volume> <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>147</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/417141a</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12000953</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhaduri</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bagui</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sikder</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>DNA topoisomerase I from <italic>Mycobacterium smegmatis</italic>. An enzyme with distinct features.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biol. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>273</volume> <fpage>13925</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13932</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.273.22.13925</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9593741</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bjorkegren</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baranello</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>DNA supercoiling, topoisomerases, and cohesin: partners in regulating chromatin architecture?</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>:<issue>884</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms19030884</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29547555</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradshaw</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saalbach</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McArthur</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Proteomic survey of the <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> nucleoid.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Proteo.</italic></source> <volume>83</volume> <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jprot.2013.02.033</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23523638</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bush</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bibb</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Findlay</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Genes required for aerial growth, cell division, and chromosome segregation are targets of WhiA before sporulation in <italic>Streptomyces venezuelae</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>mBio</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>e00684</issue>-13. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00684-13</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24065632</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Camacho-Carranza</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Membrillo-Hernandez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramirez-Santos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castro-Dorantes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chagoya de Sanchez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomez-Eichelmann</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Topoisomerase activity during the heat shock response in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K-12.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>177</volume> <fpage>3619</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3622</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.177.12.3619-3622.1995</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7768879</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cameron</surname> <given-names>A. D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoebel</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorman</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>DNA supercoiling is differentially regulated by environmental factors and FIS in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella enterica</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>80</volume> <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07560.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21276095</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Champoux</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>413</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bruton</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plaskitt</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mendez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmann</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>The developmental fate of <italic>S. coelicolor</italic> hyphae depends upon a gene product homologous with the motility sigma factor of <italic>B. subtilis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Cell</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>143</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(89)90876-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2507166</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasquez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Annamalai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tamayo-Castillo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clardy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Identification of anziaic acid, a lichen depside from <italic>Hypotrachyna</italic> sp., as a new topoisomerase poison inhibitor.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e60770</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0060770</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23593306</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheung</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Badarinarayana</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Selinger</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janse</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Church</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>A microarray-based antibiotic screen identifies a regulatory role for supercoiling in the osmotic stress response of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Res.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.401003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12566398</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Claret</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouviere-Yaniv</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Variation in HU composition during growth of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: the heterodimer is required for long term survival.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Mol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>273</volume> <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmbi.1997.1310</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9367749</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dame</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The role of nucleoid-associated proteins in the organization and compaction of bacterial chromatin.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>858</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>870</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04598.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15853876</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Crecy-Lagard</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Servant-Moisson</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viala</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grandvalet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mazodier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Alteration of the synthesis of the Clp ATP-dependent protease affects morphological and physiological differentiation in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01364.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10320574</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>den Hengst</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bibb</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leskiw</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Genes essential for morphological development and antibiotic production in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> are targets of BldD during vegetative growth.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07338.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20979333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorman</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, nucleoid structure and gene expression.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2261</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20140026</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Donczew</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mackiewicz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wr&#x00F3;bel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fl&#x00E4;rdh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakrzewska-Czerwi&#x00F1;ska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>ParA and ParB coordinate chromosome segregation with cell elongation and division during <italic>Streptomyces</italic> sporulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Open Biol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>150263</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsob.150263</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27248800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elliot</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bibb</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leskiw</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>BldD is a direct regulator of key developmental genes in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>269</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02387.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11298292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Facey</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hitchings</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saavedra-Garcia</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fernandez-Martinez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dyson</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Del Sol</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Streptomyces coelicolor Dps-like proteins: differential dual roles in response to stress during vegetative growth and in nucleoid condensation during reproductive cell division.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>73</volume> <fpage>1186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1202</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06848.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19719512</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fernandez De Henestrosa</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aoyagi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chafin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohmori</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Identification of additional genes belonging to the LexA regulon in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>1560</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1572</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01826.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10760155</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferr&#x00E1;ndiz</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arnanz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;n-Galiano</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Mart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de la Campa</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Role of global and local topology in the regulation of gene expression in <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e101574</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0101574</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25019515</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferrandiz</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin-Galiano</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arnanz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Camacho-Soguero</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tirado-Velez</surname> <given-names>J.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de la Campa</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>An increase in negative supercoiling in bacteria reveals topology-reacting gene clusters and a homeostatic response mediated by the DNA topoisomerase I gene.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>7292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7303</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkw602</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27378778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferrandiz</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin-Galiano</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schvartzman</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de la Campa</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae is organized in topology-reacting gene clusters.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>3570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3581</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkq106</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20176571</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flardh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title><italic>Streptomyces morphogenetics</italic>: dissecting differentiation in a filamentous bacterium.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1968</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19079351</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fowler-Goldsworthy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gust</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mouz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Findlay</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The actinobacteria-specific gene wblA controls major developmental transitions in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiol. Read. Engl.</italic></source> <volume>157</volume> <fpage>1312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1328</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.047555-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21330440</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blazquez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrandiz</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanz</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva-Martin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hermoso</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>New alkaloid antibiotics that target the DNA topoisomerase I of <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biol. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>286</volume> <fpage>6402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6413</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M110.148148</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21169356</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mallick</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Direct regulation of topoisomerase activity by a nucleoid-associated protein.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>11156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11165</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gku804</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25200077</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gmuender</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuratli</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di Padova</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gray</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keck</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Gene expression changes triggered by exposure of <italic>Haemophilus influenzae</italic> to novobiocin or ciprofloxacin: combined transcription and translation analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Res.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.157701</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11156613</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Godbole</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradley</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekins</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis topoisomerase I by m-AMSA, a eukaryotic type II topoisomerase poison.</article-title> <source><italic>Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>446</volume> <fpage>916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>920</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.03.029</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24642256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guha</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Udupa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rewired downregulation of DNA gyrase impacts cell division, expression of topology modulators, and transcription in <italic>Mycobacterium smegmatis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Mol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>430</volume> <fpage>4986</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5001</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2018.10.001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30316784</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hindra Moody</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elliot</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Complex intra-operonic dynamics mediated by a small RNA in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e85856</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0085856</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24465751</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Homerova</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sevcikova</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sprusansky</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kormanec</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Identification of DNA-binding proteins involved in regulation of expression of the <italic>Streptomyces aureofaciens</italic> sigF gene, which encodes sporulation sigma factor sigma(F).</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiol. Read. Engl.</italic></source> 146(Pt 11), <fpage>2919</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2928</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00221287-146-11-2919</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11065370</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horiuchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takagi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yano</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Relaxation of supercoiled plasmid DNA by oxidative stresses in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>160</volume> <fpage>1017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1021</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6389504</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molle</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sohlberg</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weaver</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bibb</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Cross-regulation among disparate antibiotic biosynthetic pathways of Streptomyces coelicolor.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>1276</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1287</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04879.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16313616</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hutchings</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoskisson</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Sensing and responding to diverse extracellular signals? Analysis of the sensor kinases and response regulators of <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiol. Read. Engl.</italic></source> <volume>150</volume> <fpage>2795</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2806</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.27181-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15347739</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gust</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakrzewska-Czerwinska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Developmental-stage-specific assembly of ParB complexes in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> hyphae.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>187</volume> <fpage>3572</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3580</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.187.10.3572-3580.2005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15866947</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Wezel</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Cell division and DNA segregation in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>: how to build a septum in the middle of nowhere?</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>85</volume> <fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>404</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08107.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22646484</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.-N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bucca</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The dynamic transcriptional and translational landscape of the model antibiotic producer <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>11605</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms11605</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27251447</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelemen</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kormanec</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Potuckova</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>The positions of the sigma-factor genes, whiG and sigF, in the hierarchy controlling the development of spore chains in the aerial hyphae of <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>593</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>603</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02567.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8866481</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kieser</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bibb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopwood</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source><italic>Practica Streptomyces Genetics.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Norwich</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Innes Foundation</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calcutt</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Partitioning of the linear chromosome during sporulation of <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2) involves an oriC-linked parAB locus.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>182</volume> <fpage>1313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1320</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.182.5.1313-1320.2000</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10671452</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kois</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swiatek</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakrzewska-Czerwi&#x0144;ska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>SMC protein-dependent chromosome condensation during aerial hyphal development in <italic>Streptomyces</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>191</volume> <fpage>310</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>319</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00513-08</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18931116</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koskiniemi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lamoureux</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nikolakakis</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>t&#x2019;Kint de Roodenbeke</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Low</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>110</volume> <fpage>7032</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7037</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1300627110</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23572593</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindow</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Britton</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grossman</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> affects supercoiling in vivo.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>184</volume> <fpage>5317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5322</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.184.19.5317-5322.2002</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12218017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lodge</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Mutations that affect Tn5 insertion into pBR322: importance of local DNA supercoiling.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>172</volume> <fpage>5956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5960</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.172.10.5956-5960.1990</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2170333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McClure</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balasubramanian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bobrovskyy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sumby</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Genco</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Computational analysis of bacterial RNA-Seq data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume>:<issue>e140</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkt444</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23716638</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McCormick</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flardh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Signals and regulators that govern <italic>Streptomyces</italic> development.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>231</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00317.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22092088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mendez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Cloning of whiG, a gene critical for sporulation of <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>169</volume> <fpage>5715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5720</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.169.12.5715-5720.1987</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3680175</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moody</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Young</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elliot</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of non-coding RNAs in the antibiotic-producing <italic>Streptomyces</italic> bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<issue>558</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-14-558</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23947565</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Novichkov</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kazakov</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravcheev</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leyn</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kovaleva</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutormin</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>RegPrecise 3.0&#x2013;a resource for genome-scale exploration of transcriptional regulation in bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<issue>745</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-14-745</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24175918</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogino</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teramoto</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Inui</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yukawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>DivS, a novel SOS-inducible cell-division suppressor in <italic>Corynebacterium glutamicum</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>597</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>608</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06069.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18086211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parsa</surname> <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramachandran</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaheen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nepal</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kapelnikov</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belcheva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Negative supercoiling creates single-stranded patches of DNA that are substrates for AID-mediated mutagenesis.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Genet.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e1002518</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1002518</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22346767</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peter</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arsuaga</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breier</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khodursky</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>P. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cozzarelli</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Genomic transcriptional response to loss of chromosomal supercoiling in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Biol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>R87</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2004-5-11-r87</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15535863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Postow</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hardy</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arsuaga</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cozzarelli</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Topological domain structure of the <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> chromosome.</article-title> <source><italic>Genes Dev.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>1766</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1779</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.1207504</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15256503</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prakash</surname> <given-names>J. S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinetova</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zorina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kupriyanova</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murata</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>DNA supercoiling regulates the stress-inducible expression of genes in the cyanobacterium <italic>Synechocystis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Biosyst.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>1904</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1912</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/B903022k</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19763333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prauser</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falta</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>Phage sensitivity, cell wall composition and taxonomy of actinomyctes.</article-title> <source><italic>Z. F&#x00FC;r Allg. Mikrobiol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5700542</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Racko</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benedetti</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dorier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stasiak</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Transcription-induced supercoiling as the driving force of chromatin loop extrusion during formation of TADs in interphase chromosomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>1648</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1660</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkx1123</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29140466</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rovinskiy</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agbleke</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chesnokova</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Higgins</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Rates of gyrase supercoiling and transcription elongation control supercoil density in a bacterial chromosome.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Genet.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e1002845</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1002845</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22916023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryding</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelemen</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whatling</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flardh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttner</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>A developmentally regulated gene encoding a repressor-like protein is essential for sporulation in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3(2).</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>357</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00939.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9701826</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salerno</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bucca</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laing</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flardh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>One of the two genes encoding nucleoid-associated HU proteins in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> is developmentally regulated and specifically involved in spore maturation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>191</volume> <fpage>6489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6500</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00709-09</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19717607</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Travers</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muskhelishvili</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The expression of the <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> fis gene is strongly dependent on the superhelical density of DNA.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02129.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11029698</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strzalka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szafran</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strick</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>C-terminal lysine repeats in <italic>Streptomyces topoisomerase</italic> I stabilize the enzyme-DNA complex and confer high enzyme processivity.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>11908</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11924</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkx827</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28981718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szafran</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skut</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ditkowski</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ginda</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakrzewska-Czerwi&#x0144;ska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Topoisomerase I (TopA) is recruited to ParB complexes and is required for proper chromosome organization during <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> sporulation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>195</volume> <fpage>4445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4455</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00798-13</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23913317</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szafran</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gongerowska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutkowski</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakrzewska-Czerwi&#x0144;ska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The coordinated positive regulation of topoisomerase genes maintains topological homeostasis in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bacteriol.</italic></source> <volume>198</volume> <fpage>3016</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3028</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00530-16</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27551021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szafran</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolodziej</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skut</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medapi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Domagala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trojanowski</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Amsacrine derivatives selectively inhibit mycobacterial topoisomerase I (TopA), impair M. smegmatis growth and disturb chromosome replication.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>1592</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01592</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30065714</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Szafran</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strick</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strza&#x0142;ka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakrzewska-Czerwi&#x0144;ska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakimowicz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>A highly processive topoisomerase I: studies at the single-molecule level.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>7935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7946</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gku494</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24880688</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tschowri</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schumacher</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlimpert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chinnam</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Findlay</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brennan</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Tetrameric c-di-GMP mediates effective transcription factor dimerization to control <italic>Streptomyces</italic> development.</article-title> <source><italic>Cell</italic></source> <volume>158</volume> <fpage>1136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1147</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.022</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25171413</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tse-Dinh</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Regulation of the <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> DNA topoisomerase I gene by DNA supercoiling.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>4751</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4763</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tse-Dinh</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menzel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>DNA supercoiling and bacterial adaptation: thermotolerance and thermoresistance.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>323</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0966-842x(97)01080-9</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9263411</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Unniraman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Regulation of DNA gyrase operon in <italic>Mycobacterium smegmatis</italic>: a distinct mechanism of relaxation stimulated transcription.</article-title> <source><italic>Genes Cells Devot. Mol. Cell. Mech.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>706</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2443.1999.00296.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10620015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weinstein-Fischer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elgrably-Weiss</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altuvia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title><italic>Escherichia coli</italic> response to hydrogen peroxide: a role for DNA supercoiling, topoisomerase I and Fis.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>1413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1420</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01805.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10760142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>M.-F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>NsdB, a TPR-like-domain-containing protein negatively affecting production of antibiotics in <italic>Streptomyces coelicolor</italic> A3 (2).</article-title> <source><italic>Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>849</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>854</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18062261</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>