Evaluating Biogenicity on the Geological Record With Synchrotron-Based Techniques

The biogenicity problem of geological materials is one of the most challenging ones in the field of paleo and astrobiology. As one goes deeper in time, the traces of life become feeble and ambiguous, blending with the surrounding geology. Well-preserved metasedimentary rocks from the Archaean are relatively rare, and in very few cases contain structures resembling biological traces or fossils. These putative biosignatures have been studied for decades and many biogenicity criteria have been developed, but there is still no consensus for many of the proposed structures. Synchrotron-based techniques, especially on new generation sources, have the potential for contributing to this field of research, providing high sensitivity and resolution that can be advantageous for different scientific problems. Exploring the X-ray and matter interactions on a range of geological materials can provide insights on morphology, elemental composition, oxidation states, crystalline structure, magnetic properties, and others, which can measurably contribute to the investigation of biogenicity of putative biosignatures. Here, we provide an overview of selected synchrotron-based techniques that have the potential to be applied in different types of questions on the study of biosignatures preserved in the geological record. The development of 3rd and recently 4th generation synchrotron sources will favor a deeper understanding of the earliest records of life on Earth and also bring up potential analytical approaches to be applied for the search of biosignatures in meteorites and samples returned from Mars in the near future.


INTRODUCTION
Elucidating the origin and evolution of life on Earth, as well as the possibilities of its occurrence and preservation outside the planet are topics of primordial interest to the astrobiological community. For the search of life in extraterrestrial worlds, distinguishing and understanding the preservation of the earliest records of life on Earth is a step of fundamental importance. Although evidences of life have been reported in rocks with more than 3.7 billion years (Ohtomo et al., 2014), several descriptions of very ancient chemical or morphological biosignatures have been debated by the scientific community over the past decades (Brocks et al., 1999;Brasier et al., 2015;Nutman et al., 2016;Dodd et al., 2017;Schopf et al., 2018). The challenge becomes even greater when the putative biosignatures are from outside Earth (whether in meteorites, or chemical or morphological signals measured in situ or that will be collected in future missions to Mars). The Viking missions on the 1970's found chemical traces that could be related to metabolism on the surface of Mars (Levin and Straat, 1977), which were later contested. The same happened in the 1990's, when McKay et al. (1996) described supposed biological microscopic structures on the ALH84001 meteorite. More recently, Noffke (2015) presented sedimentary structures resembling terrestrial microbially-induced sedimentary structures (MISS) on Mars, based on morphological analysis of images from the rover Curiosity, which instigated the astrobiological community in the hope of finding chemical biosignatures or other evidences that could support their biogenicity.
The application of analytical techniques in paleo and astrobiology has contributed to the advancement of knowledge about the indicatives of past or present biological activity from macroscopic to nanometric scales. Techniques such as Raman Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffraction, X-ray Tomography, Electron Microscopy and nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (Nano SIMS) are now being routinely applied on Earth sciences. Meanwhile, techniques based on synchrotron light are gaining more space as promising tools for the non-destructive investigation of paleobiological samples, giving rise to an emerging field known as paleometry (Gomes et al., 2019). Some of these techniques are summarized in Table 1.
Synchrotron accelerators produce light with unique qualities, such as high brilliance (flux of photons per unit area), broad, continuous energy range, and high coherence, which are unattainable by conventional light sources, such as lasers, lamps or X-ray tubes. These characteristics allow the use of multiple physical phenomena to unveil the original elemental and molecular composition, mineralogy and morphology of samples, with higher sensitivity, penetrability and resolution than conventional techniques applied for the same purposes. In the present review, we will discuss recent applications and potentials of some synchrotron-based techniques for evaluating biosignatures in the geological record.
Biosignatures include, among others, (i) morphological features, such as preserved cells or extracellular components, as fossilized extracellular polymeric substance (EPS); (ii) biogenic minerals, such as those biologically-induced (i.e., biogenic dolomite precipitated in microbialites and microbial mats) or biologically-controlled (i.e., endoskeletons and hard mineralized parts of metazoans), which sometimes present crystallographic characteristics and/or physical properties that can be distinguished for those abiotic minerals (i.e., biogenic magnetite, such as magnetites produced inside the cells of magnetotactic bacteria (magnetosomes); (iii) specific textures or biogenic fabrics in rocks originated by microbial activity, such as fenestral fabrics in microbialites; (iv) molecular vestiges linked to biological activity, such as organic ligands, lipids, organic macromolecules, etc; (v) specific chemical characteristics of bioprocessing, such as chirality in organic molecules; (vi) stable isotopes favorable to biogenic patterns and bioprocessing. Interpreting these signals as biosignatures is not always trivial, especially if these samples are from deep time context (Javaux, 2019). One example is the distribution pattern of bio-elements (trace or major) in the samples of interest. The interpretation of signals of past life in these distributions may be complex and others aspects need to be considered, such as the co-occurrence of other types of biosignatures, such as morphological and chemical (isotopes, co-localization of elements, combinations with organic signatures, etc.), or characteristics of the authigenic mineralogy and properties of the original geological context.
The complexity of interpretation also increase considering the possibilities of posterior contaminations and the several changes in the original characteristics of mineralogy and geological features, the action of metamorphism and changes of temperature which can degrade or modify the organic biosignatures, besides several other alterations during the postburial processes over time. Thus, it is important to do critical interpretations of the signs of early life in order to avoid misinterpretations and/or equivocal biosignatures. There are several examples in the literature regarding the contestation or reassessment of alleged evidence of ancient life on Earth and outside it (McKay et al., 1996;Golden et al., 2000;Thomas-Keprta et al., 2002, 2009Steele et al., 2012). Some will be discussed in the following specific sessions.

IMAGING MORPHOLOGICAL BIOSIGNATURES
Morphological traces of microorganisms are important biosignatures for providing direct insights into ancient life ultrastructure, evolution, paleo-environment and also to help to understand the physico-chemical conditions that allowed their long-term preservation. High resolution microscopies applied so far, such as Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) have allowed significative advances on the understanding of the earliest fossilized microbes. Their application, however, is limited by the low penetration depth of electrons, thus requiring destructive sample preparation for exposing the structures from within the rock matrix (potentially introducing artifacts), or by preparing ultra thin (<100 nm) sections that can sample only a small fraction of the specimen. 3D images can be achieved by using a focused ion beam (FIB) coupled to a SEM (FIB-SEM), and combining sequential milling with concurrent Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS-SEM) imaging. Although being a destructive approach, it has allowed even some of the most ancient microfossils to be investigated at the nanoscale, providing insights into their chemistry, ultrastructure, taphonomy and investigating the biogenicity of these structures (Wacey et al., 2012;Brasier et al., 2015).
X-rays can penetrate objects and provide information of their interior non-destructively, therefore having the potential of overcoming the limitations of electron microscopy. Conventional X-ray imaging, such as the widely known Computed Tomography (CT), is based in the absorption of X-rays, a physical interaction which relies on the densities and/or atomic numbers of the materials comprising the specimens. For mineralized structures such as some fossils, this can represent a limitation in contrast. Synchrotron sources allow other contrast modalities to be explored, such as the phase contrast. Phasecontrast µ-CT has become critical for paleobiological studies in the last decades (Tafforeau et al., 2006;Cunningham et al., 2012;Maldanis et al., 2016), due to its capacity of extracting 3D information from these homogeneously dense specimens non-invasively, revealing even the preservation of soft tissues. Recently, the limit of resolution of X-ray microscopy has been pushed forward by the development of techniques based on Coherent Diffraction Imaging (CDI), specially Ptychography. This lensless method allows specimens of tens of microns to be imaged with nanometric resolution, and can also be applied in 3D, receiving the name of Ptychographic X-Ray Computed Tomography, or PXCT (Holler et al., 2014). This imaging approach is based in the collection in the far-field of diffraction patterns partially superposed while scanning the sample. This redundancy of measurements allows the reconstruction of the specimen's complex refraction index (both absorption and phase components) using iterative algorithms instead of X-ray lenses. PXCT has been only briefly applied to the study of microfossils (Cunningham et al., 2015;Guizar-Sicairos et al., 2015), and its potential for evaluating the biogenicity of morphological Not all minerals will luminesce on the given condition; it has to be combined to other techniques for a complete interpretation of data Kolodny et al., 1996;Rakovan and Reeder, 1996;Dartnell and Patel, 2014;Gaft et al., 2015;Lin et al., 2015;Marshall et al., 2017;Shkolyar et al., 2018 Advantages and disadvantages in comparison with conventional techniques and examples of applicability are also shown.
Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org biosignatures has still to be further explored. Nevertheless, its potential for unveiling whole fossilized microbes within their geological context also configures it as a potential methodology to be used for searching morphological biosignatures potentially preserved in rocks returned from Mars in the near-future.

ELEMENTAL MAPPING OF CHEMICAL BIOSIGNATURES
Metabolic processes of biological systems can generate traces or patterns uncommon to abiotic systems. For geobiological materials, these biosignatures can be present in the form of biominerals with different crystalline organizations or specific distributions, mineral assemblages in association with organic matter and modifications on the mineral surface (Banfield et al., 2001). Some elements are considered to be bio-essential and biofunctional (i.e., P, S, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo, As, and Pb) (Williams and Frausto da Silva, 1996), and when colocalized and/or associated to specific morphological patterns, such as layered distribution or in consonance with organic matter, they could represent biosignatures, including results of biological processes. Moreover, the geochemical composition and growth processes of microbial mats favor the binding of some metals, which can be reorganized during the development of the community, forming biominerals or being adsorbed on the surface of minerals. Identifying and mapping the chemical elements present in geobiological structures can provide means of supporting their biogenicity and also understanding their ecological interactions and modes of preservation. Nevertheless, identifying these elements and distinguishing patterns generated by biotic from abiotic processes require approaches with high-spatial resolution, sensitivity to a broad range of elements and to trace element concentrations. In questions about biogenicity studies, in particular for elemental distribution analyzes such as X-ray fluorescence mapping, it is important to consider the colocation of elements with morphological structures of interest, original lithology and its possible changes, the co-occurrence of biogeochemical elements of interest and also their abundance limits taking into account the geological and preservational context. The combination of as much evidence as possible that can explore the depositional history, and especially the diagenetic alterations that may have exerted any changes in the preservation of authigenic characteristics, it is important to minimize any misinterpretation, especially in deep time rocks.
Synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence (SR-XRF) allows the identification, mapping and semi-quantification of chemical elements even in concentrations of parts per billion (ppb), and has a spatial resolution primarily dependent on the size of the X-ray beam, which, in the case of the new generation synchrotrons, can reach nanometric dimensions. The range of elements that can be detected with this approach depends on the energy of the X-rays, once the fluorescence phenomenon relies on the removal of strongly-binded inner-shell electrons, creating vacancies that need to be filled by external electrons. The difference of energy between the electrons involved in this process is emitted as photons, generating a fluorescence pattern which is specific to each element. One example of case study using SR-µ-XRF was applied to discuss the biogenicity of pyrites in a microbial context in order to understand the role of bacteria in the tafonomical process of well-preserved fossilized organisms in Crato Basin, Brazil (Osés et al., 2017). The authors combined morphological biosignatures, such as putative fossilized bacterial EPS observed in SEM with framboidal pyrites, using the SRµ-XRF mapping to identify some metals (i.e., Fe, Cu, and Zn) which could be incorporated in the system by microbial activity (Figure 1). Sforna et al. (2016) used SR-µXRF and complementary approaches to assess the metal incorporation in living microbialites and their remobilization during a simulated diagenetic processes. They mapped the distribution of metals triggered by secondary abiotic processes and provided a basis of comparison for evaluating ancient Precambrian microbialites. Recently, SR-µ-XRF was also applied in combination with conventional techniques and magnetic analysis by Callefo et al. (2019), in order to evaluate the biogenicity of iron minerals in carboniferous rhythmites (periodic sedimentary depositions). The distribution pattern of iron in co-occurrence with putative MISS and organic matter, plus the magnetic signal compatible with biogenic magnetite, indicated a biological origin for the iron minerals, allowing a reassessment the depositional history of the geological site.
FIGURE 1 | Application of synchrotron-based X-ray microfluorescence in fossil fish from Crato Member, Brazil (Osés et al., 2017), showing the potential of elemental mapping in providing information about the original elemental composition (interpreted as biosignatures) and diagenetic processes (interpreted as secondary incorporation). In this case, the authors used the elemental mapping to identify some metals (i.e., Fe, Cu, and Zn) related to the incorporation by microbial activity, in order to discuss the biogenicity of pyrites and understand the role of bacteria in the tafonomical process.  For both maps the blue shows the highest X-ray intensity while the red shows the lowest intensity (counts per second); the maps are for K-shell X-rays except for Ba, which was detected using L-shell X-rays (Allwood et al., 2018). Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature.
Studying organic-walled microfossils, Marshall et al. (2017) reported the application of XRF for mapping V, an element present in chlorophyll and heme porphyrin pigments. The authors propose that the co-localization of this element within microfossil-like morphologies and carbonaceous composition can be used as a biosignature for putative microfossils, and could also be applied in samples returned from Mars in the near future. Allwood et al. (2018), in order to reassess the biogenicity of putative microbialites from 3.7 Ga Isua supracrustal belt published by Nutman et al. (2016), used the distribution of trace elements relative to minerals in the putative structures (Figure 2). In combination of other techniques to reveal the three-dimensional, morphology and orientation of the structures, the X-ray fluorescence showed the distribution of major and trace elements inside the morphology of the putative stromatolites, revealing an alternative explanation for the origin of the structures. For the authors, it is plausible a non-biological formation of the structures, consisting of a feature caused after burial process by deformations in a carbonate-altered metasediments. The authors argue that in the previous interpretation (from Nutman et al., 2016) for the trace-elements in the three-dimensional structure as evidence of primary marine carbonate sedimentation, in fact was result as a mixture of samples, including micas, not only dolomite. Once micas can carry oligoelements in these rocks along the geological history, the biogenicity of the structures become questionable. This case may illustrate the need for further analysis and other evidences to complement the use of elemental biosignatures.

DIFFERENTIATING BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC ELEMENTS SPECIES
One of the main challenges in the search of chemical biosignatures associated to microfossils and microbialites is the fact that the original biochemical components of microorganisms are degraded and altered over time, while other non-biogenic elements are incorporated in the course of diagenetic processes (Lemelle et al., 2008). The metabolic activity of microorganisms, however, generates redox heterogeneities, which, sometimes in association to organic compounds, can constitute biosignatures (Miot et al., 2014). The speciation of elements provides information about oxidation state and chemical neighboring, which can provide valuable insights into microorganismminerals interactions and ancient metabolisms.
The possibility to tune the energy of X-rays in synchrotron sources allows the application of X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS), an approach based on the analysis of the absorption profile of a given element prior to the core electrons removal with the incidence of X-rays (the same phenomenon described above for the generation of the fluorescence signal). The different regions analyzed on the absorption spectra gives rise to two different techniques, X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES), and Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS). These techniques are strongly sensitive to the oxidation state of the elements and can also provide information about the coordination of the absorbing ions. When associated to the small beams available at scanning X-ray microscopes, speciation maps with nanometric resolution can be achieved. These techniques have already been applied at lower concentrations and at less-than-perfect sample conditions (Newville, 2014), as the ones usually present in natural geological samples.
There are several examples of the use of these techniques as a complement both in reinforcing and in questioning the biogenicity of ancient microbialites and microfossils. Lemelle et al. (2008) found biomarkers related to organic S associated to microfossils by evaluating the sulfur absorption K-edge. Grosch et al. (2017) used XANES to question the biogenicity of 3.47 Ga filament-shaped titanite microtextures in early Archean samples from Barberton Greenstone Belt, South Africa, which was considered the oldest microbial trace-fossil on Earth. The authors used temperature maps combined with µ-XANES for Fe speciation profiles in chlorites present in metabasalts that contained the filaments. The data pointed to metamorphic constraints that indicated incompatibility with the biogenicity of the structures. In contrast, De Gregorio et al. (2009) used XANES with Scanning-Transmission X-ray Microscopy (STXM) and complementary techniques in order to reinforce the biogenicity of 3.5 Ga putative microfossils from Apex Chert, Western Australia. The authors found similar characteristics on these specimens with biogenic kerogen from the ca. 1.9 Ga Gunflint Formation. In this study, XANES provided information about the chemical complexity of kerogen, which presented aromatic carbon and oxygenated functional groups. Sancho-Tomás et al. (2018) applied XANES and µ-XRF in combination with conventional analysis and showed the relationship between the biological processing of As with the mineralogy in recent hypersaline microbial mats, by evaluating the mineral occurrence, the As speciation and the elemental distribution.
With the intense photon beams of 3rd and 4th generation synchrotron sources, radiation damage of the samples should also be considered. Potentially preserved organic molecules are the most fragile ones, and can suffer from photooxidation and breakup depending on the measuring condition. However, even inorganic signatures can be altered, as X-rays can change the oxidation state of elements (e.g., photo-reduction of sulfur as reported by Moussallam et al., 2014), or produce defects on the crystal lattice of minerals. It is possible to use the advantage of the brilliant beams while minimizing exposition by performing very fast scans, both in energy (for spectroscopy) and in space (for imaging). This should be taken in consideration on the design of new beamlines that intend to be used on radiation-sensitive materials. Theoretical calculations and test measurements with standards can optimize the systems before the measurement, ir order to collect enough signal to allow the study, but delivering the minimum dose possible. Different strategies of analysis for mitigating and monitoring these effects for ancient materials have been reviewed by Bertrand et al. (2014).
It is possible to use the chemical information obtained with XAS as a contrast for an imaging approach, called STXM is a type of X-ray microscopy which uses XANES as its contrast mechanism (Ade and Urquhart, 2002). This approach works usually in the soft X-ray energy range (130-2.500 eV), and can reach nanometric scale of spatial resolution. This range of energy can interact with almost all elements, besides allow to map chemical species based on bonding structure. The use of soft X-rays also reduce the risks of damage for radiation, in comparison with the electron beam techniques (Lawrence et al., 2003). One advantage is the possibility of working with bulk samples, as long as it is transparent to the beam, and the possibility of imaging a number of key-elements of interest in the same sample. This technique has been utilized for determining the speciation of elements such as carbon and nitrogen in microfossils at submicrometric scale, such as organic microfossils from 1.88 Ga Gunflint Formation (Alleon et al., 2016), refining the knowledge about the degradation of organic biosignatures along the time, especially by the effects of temperature changes along the diagenetic processes.
Infrared techniques can also be powerful tools for studies of detection and study of the preservation or alteration of organic biosignatures. It possible to retrieve infrared spectra in absorption or emission of samples in gas, liquid or solid state, with high spectral resolutions and in a wide spectral range. Although there are several studies using conventional infrared techniques for the study of biosignatures (Guido et al., 2012;Preston et al., 2014;Gordon and Septhon, 2016;Gaboyer et al., 2017;Igisu et al., 2018;Stevens et al., 2019), there is still a lack of reference in the use of synchrotron-based FTIR (SR-FTIR) techniques for this purpose. The synchrotron-based approach has the advantage of the high flux and broad range of energy, which allows the acquisition of fast spectra with high signal-noise ratio. For biological signatures, this can mean a decrease in the risk of degradation of biosignatures during the measurement time.
An example of application of SR-FTIR on the evaluation of chemical biosignatures' behavior during the fossilization process was presented by Benning et al. (2004), in which SR-FTIR micro-spectroscopy was applied to determine the response of the organic structure of live cyanobacterial cells. The vibration of the original components of the microbial cells (specific functional groups related to the cells), together with the characteristic vibrations for silica was analyzed during the progressive silicification. This is especially relevant, as silicification is one of the most common fossilization processes and present high capability of biosignature preservation during the geological time (Konhauser et al., 2004;Wacey et al., 2011;Campbell et al., 2015;Sugitani et al., 2015;Manning-Berg et al., 2019).

INVESTIGATING THE STRUCTURE, OPTICAL AND MAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF BIOMINERALS
The advantage of biominerals (Dove et al., 2003;Perry et al., 2007;Dupraz et al., 2009) in their use as biosignatures is due to they are more resistant to deep-time geological processes and to several alterations that can be caused by the diagenesis. In comparison with organic biomarkers, for instance, the biominerals are more persistent in nature over the time (Jimenez-Lopez et al., 2010). Biominerals are very important for the study of past life on the planet, as they can represent life records present in rocks of very old ages. In the case of magnetofossils, it can be a good biomarker for the presence of past life on Earth and beyond (McKay et al., 1996). However, in order to be able to use them as biosignatures, it is first necessary to know the intrinsic characteristics that differ them from minerals of abiotic origin, and to compare them in order to establish biogenicity parameters. Biominerals can be differentiated from minerals of abiotic origin due to some intrinsic characteristics that they present. It is known that the biomineralization processes can influence the organization of minerals, allowing one to differentiate biogenic and abiogenic minerals regarding, for instance, their crystalline structure and physical properties (Chang and Kirschvink, 1989;Bazylinski et al., 1995;Thomas-Keprta et al., 2000;Egli, 2004). In the biologically-controlled mineralization, the genetics of the organisms/microorganisms can control intrinsically the mineral nucleation according some physiological or morphological need (Mann, 2001;Dupraz et al., 2009). This intrinsic control can originate characteristics that can be distinguishable from those inorganic minerals, such as some properties and organizations observed in internal and external skeletons (i.e., Ma et al., 2016;Rao et al., 2016) or observed in different origins of magnetites (Bazylinski et al., 1995;Thomas-Keprta et al., 2000;Körnig et al., 2014). These biominerals (or organominerals, such as suggested by Mann (2001) when the mineral is genetically controlled during its formation) can be considered direct evidence of life, consisting, when properly detected, a consistent biosignature. For instance, there are at least six specific characteristics that can distinguish the intracellular magnetite from detrital magnetite (Thomas-Keprta et al., 2000). They are: small size of the crystals to until a few dozen nanometers (single domain -SD), controlled mainly by the EPS; chemical purity and crystallographic perfection (less contaminants or exogenous elements between the atoms chains which forms the crystal lattices); organization in chains (when consists of magnetofossils or fresh cells), uncommon shapes of particles (such as bulletshaped or elongated crystals which can not be mimicked by inorganic processes); and a trendy to elongation of the crystals when they are organized in chains toward the crystallographic direction [111]. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) is a potential technique to be used in the study of mineral biosignatures due to its capability of identifying crystalline phases such as inorganic and organic ordered structures preserved and/or secreted by living organisms. This kind of technique is selective and can identify synthetic or natural minerals (Tadic and Epple, 2004). Even if a material presents mixed crystal structures, the characteristic peaks produced from different planes of reflection may allow the identification of specific crystalline phases. Thus, XRD is a very important tool for evaluating the biogenicity of minerals (Che et al., 2016;Iñiguez et al., 2017), allowing the detection of past life evidence in ancient rocks, fossils and even rocks from Mars in the future.
The detection limit of XRD depends on the measurement geometry, incident photon energy, spot size, and flux. Compared to conventional X-ray diffractometers, synchrotron measurements allow the study of very dilute phases with high angular resolution (2θ 10 −4• ), considering the Bragg-Brentano geometry and the measurement in 2θ, which can be used to deconvolute very close peaks. This can be used to distinguish biotic and abiotic crystals, for example, magnetic compounds like greigite and magnetites produced by bacteria (Miot et al., 2014;Till et al., 2017).
Still exploring the possibility of detecting biominerals, another technique applicable to biogenicity problems of minerals, the X-ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism (XMCD), is able to give information about the orbital magnetic moment and the spin of the material. The technique provides information about the 3d electronic states in transition metals, such as Fe, Ni, Co, etc., which is responsible for the magnetic properties of the minerals (Stöhr, 1999;Rogalev et al., 2006). XMCD has been increasingly used to provide detailed information about the electronic and magnetic structure of nanoparticles (van der Laan and Figueroa, 2014), and this can be interesting for the study of biogenicity, especially for the investigation of ferromagnetic biominerals, such as biogenic magnetite and greigite. The technique is based on the dichroic effect, which occurs when left and right polarized light passes through a material showing differences in the absorption coefficients. Dichroism can be caused by the spin or by the anisotropy of the material, such as the magnetic anisotropy of certain minerals (Stöhr, 1999). That is, depending on the crystallographic direction of the mineral, the absorption of the light will be different, generating different spectra. Bacteria can produce extracellular nanoparticles of magnetite by different metabolic pathways, such as the iron oxidation under aerobic conditions. Also, another group, the magnetotactic bacteria, can originate intracellular magnetite in chains, the magnetosomes. These biominerals can be part of the fossil record or can be part of rocks with dubious origin. The XMCD technique has been shown to be a good tool in some biogenicity problems, especially regarding ferromagnetic minerals, as it can provide information about the ratio of iron species in magnetites of different origins (biogenic and inorganic), crystallinity, mineralogical structure and purity of the crystal. The crystallographic and magnetic characteristics of biogenic magnetites that allows to differentiate them from the inorganic minerals (Thomas-Keprta et al., 2000), could also be detectable with XMCD. For example, Carvallo et al. (2008), combining data from TEM analysis, used XMCD to demonstrate the high purity and crystallinity of biogenic nanomagnetite, showing that these particles contained higher amount of Fe 2+ than the abiogenic nanomagnetite. The authors utilized the technique to compare the ratio of Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ in biogenic and inorganic magnetite nanoparticles synthesized, concluding that biogenic ones have higher crystallinity and higher amount of Fe 2+ when measured in comparison with the inorganic nanoparticles. The authors concluded that the difference signal between the biogenic and abiogenic XMCD spectra is bigger than any systematic instrumental error.
Also using XMCD, Coker et al. (2007) compared magnetosome crystals with extracellular magnetite and inorganic magnetite, showing the similarity of the magnetosomes with the stoichiometric magnetite and their higher chemical purity in comparison with the other non-intracellular crystals. The works of Coker et al. (2007) and Carvallo et al. (2008) can be useful by presenting parameters to differentiate biogenic and abiogenic magnetites, taking into account the high crystallinity and high Fe 2+ content in the intracellular magnetites. The exceptional reducing power of bacteria such as Shewanella putrefaciens probably explains the high concentration of Fe 2+ in comparison to nanoparticles of abiotic origin.
The optical activity from organic and inorganic compounds has also been proposed as a tool for the detection and characterization of biosignatures. For example, kerogen (Marshall et al., 2017;Shkolyar et al., 2018), proteins (Dartnell and Patel, 2014;Lin et al., 2015) and minerals can be associated with the past presence of life in an environment. Gaft et al. (2015) showed several minerals in which the optical activity may be associated with rocks formed in different contexts. The optical channels in these materials, i.e., the ions and/or defects responsible for the luminescence, are described as in function of oxidation state and their optical transition (wavelength emission, time decay) when stimulated with ultraviolet (UV), visible and infrared (IR) light. X-ray Excited Optical Luminescence (XEOL) can be used for the same purpose. However, the excitation with X-rays allows the observation of all optical active channels due to their capability of exciting core levels, making the optical process dependent of the lattice relaxation. Defects may be probed and explored, as well as their characteristics such as oxidation state, origin (intrinsically or extrinsically formed) (Teixeira et al., 2014;Finch et al., 2016;Rezende et al., 2016), and the environment they were formed, for example, when a living organism has started its fossilization process or even why a precious gemstone presents determined color (Tao, 2016).
XEOL is a photon-in/photon out technique in which X-rays are used to excite core levels and getting light emitted in the range from the UV to IR (Sham, 2002). It is site-selective and can be used with variable X-ray photon energy, deeply penetrating a structure to excite its optical channels to explore their origins. XEOL combined with techniques such as XRF and XRD can be a powerful tool to describe a whole picture about composition and elements distribution in natural materials. Beamlines of 4th generations synchrotrons, such as the Carnaúba beamline of the Sirius light source (Tolentino et al., 2017), in Brazil, will have specific setups for the application of multi-technique analysis (XRF, XAS, XRD, and XEOL) of environmental samples, such as rocks and fossils. It will be possible to map optical active channels with a micro/nanosized and high resolution probe that will allow to explore the presence, for example, of an ion inside of minerals from the bones of a fossil and their characteristics (Kolodny et al., 1996;Rakovan and Reeder, 1996).

CONCLUSION
The complexity of attestations of biogenicity on geological and paleobiological materials makes it essential to explore multiple and complementary approaches in different length and sensitivity scales. For the micron-and nanoscales synchrotron-based techniques represent the forefront of the application of photons for the inspection of a wide range of materials, allowing complex and heterogeneous samples to be studied at an unprecedented level of detail. Synchrotron approaches are been consolidated as important tools for the deeper understanding of the records of ancient life on Earth and for the non-destructive investigation of extremely rare samples, such as meteorites and rocks that will be retrieved from Mars in the near-future sample return missions.
The recent developments in synchrotron sources also brings good perspectives for the study of biosignatures. The novel 4th generation sources, such as MAX IV in Sweden, Sirius in Brazil, and the upgraded sources ESRF-II in France, APS-U in the United States and Spring8-II in Japan are opening up new avenues for the nanoscale investigation of different types of materials. For geobiological specimens, these machines will allow the achievement of nanometric spatial resolution for resolving preserved morphological fossils and also microbial-mineral interactions with different chemical and morphological contrast information, high energy and high spectral resolution for probing, mapping and speciating heavy Z elements and high sensitivity to elements in trace concentrations. These advances will allow complex and important questions on the early chemical and morphological biosignatures to be attacked, likely consolidating synchrotron paleometry and nanopalebiology within biogeosciences and astrobiology.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors contributed to the literature revision and manuscript writing.