Biocontrol Potential of Grapevine Endophytic and Rhizospheric Fungi Against Trunk Pathogens

Grapevine Trunk Diseases (GTDs) are a major challenge to the grape industry worldwide. GTDs are responsible for considerable loss of quality, production, and vineyard longevity. Seventy-five percent of Chilean vineyards are estimated to be affected by GTDs. GTDs are complex diseases caused by several fungi species, including members of the Botryosphaeriaceae family and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, considered some of the most important causal agents for these diseases in Chile. In this study, we isolated 169 endophytic and 209 rhizospheric fungi from grapevines grown under organic and conventional farming in Chile. Multiple isolates of Chaetomium sp., Cladosporium sp., Clonostachys rosea, Epicoccum nigrum, Purpureocillium lilacinum, and Trichoderma sp. were evaluated for their potential of biocontrol activity against Diplodia seriata, Neofusicoccum parvum, and Pa. chlamydospora. Tests of antagonism were carried out using two dual-culture-plate methods with multiple media types, including agar containing grapevine wood extract to simulate in planta nutrient conditions. Significant pathogen growth inhibition was observed by all isolates tested. Clonostachys rosea showed 98.2% inhibition of all pathogens in the presence of grapevine wood extract. We observed 100% pathogen growth inhibition when autoclaved lignified grapevine shoots were pre-inoculated with either C. rosea strains or Trichoderma sp. Overall, these results show that C. rosea strains isolated from grapevines are promising biocontrol agents against GTDs.


INTRODUCTION
Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are a major challenge to viticulture worldwide because they compromise the productivity and longevity of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) and increase production costs (Munkvold et al., 1994;Bertsch et al., 2013;Kaplan et al., 2016;Gramaje et al., 2018). GTDs are one of the main phytosanitary problems of the grape industry also in Chile (Auger et al., 2004;Díaz et al., 2011b). Chile is the first and fourth largest grape and wine exporter globally, respectively (Felzensztein, 2014;Pizarro, 2018;USDA Foreign Agricultural Center, 2019). In 2013, about 22% of the commercial vineyards in Chile showed symptoms of GTDs Latorre, 2018).
Biocontrol of GTDs using microorganisms is a promising alternative. For example, Trichoderma spp. are effective as a protectant of pruning wounds (John et al., 2004;Halleen et al., 2010;Mondello et al., 2018). The goal of our work was to identify microorganisms with biocontrol potential among the natural microbial inhabitants of grapevines. Endophytes are microorganisms that inhabit and colonize the internal plant tissue without causing visible damage or illness in the host (Petrini, 1991;Hirsch and Braun, 1992;Stone et al., 2000;Schulz and Boyle, 2005). These microorganisms are known to mediate plant-environment as well as plant-pathogen interactions (White et al., 1997;Zabalgogeazcoa, 2008). The contribution of different epiphytes and endophyte species to plant defenses has been widely documented (Azevedo et al., 2000;Arnold et al., 2003;Pieterse et al., 2014). Plant defense induction and antibiotic substance production that inhibits the growth of pathogens and pests (Mousa and Raizada, 2013), by endophytic fungi (Arnold et al., 2001;Kaul et al., 2012), bacteria (Hardoim et al., 2008), viruses (Lehtonen et al., 2006), and insects (Azevedo et al., 2000) have been reported. The rationale behind focusing on endophytes in the search of effective biocontrol agents against GTDs was twofold (Wicaksono et al., 2017). First, grapevine endophytes survive naturally inside this plant; therefore, these isolates, once applied, should have better chances to successfully colonize the internal tissue of the grapevine than biocontrol agents selected from other biological systems (Hardoim et al., 2008(Hardoim et al., , 2015López-Fernández et al., 2016). Second, endophytes share the same niche with plant pathogens; thus, in addition to plantdefense induction and antibiosis, they could also compete for space and nutrients with GTD pathogens (Zabalgogeazcoa, 2008;Aroca, 2013;Bacon and White, 2016).
Here we report the isolation and identification of endophytic and rhizospheric fungi from grapevines grown in commercial and non-commercial vineyards in Chile. From this collection, we selected antagonist candidates and evaluated them for growth inhibition activity against the main GTD fungal species found in Chile, in co-culture, and in planta assays, providing also a general inside of the mechanisms used for this. All of the abovementioned, with the aim of finding potential biocontrol agents to control GTDs.

Sample Origin and Plant Material
Samples of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay were collected from four commercial vineyards located in the central valleys in Chile under either organic or, conventional farming systems in May 2017 ( Table 1). Samples of cv. País were collected in September 2017 from a vineyard where diseases are not managed, located in the Codpa Valley, Chile ( Table 1). All plants sampled presented no symptoms of GTDs.

Isolation of Endophytic Fungi
The isolation of endophytic fungi was performed following the methodology described in Pancher et al. (2012). Briefly, shoots (50 cm long) and roots were cut into 10-cm-long fragments. Fragments were surface disinfected by rounds of 2 min serial immersions in 90% ethanol, then 2% sodium hypochlorite solution, and 70% ethanol, followed by double-rinsing in sterile distilled water under laminar airflow. Absence of microbial growth on surface-sterilized shoots was confirmed by plating the distilled water from the last wash step on potato dextrose agar (PDA; BD-Difco) in Petri dishes, that were then incubated for 2 weeks at 25 • C. After disinfection, fragments were further cut into 2.5 mm pieces. Each section was placed on Petri dishes (90mm diameter), placing the vascular bundle toward the growing media, containing: (i) PDA (39 g L −1 ; BD-Difco), (ii) malt extract agar (MEA, 33.6 g L −1 ; BD-Difco), and (iii) plain agar (AA, 20 g L −1 ; Difco), each one with antibiotics (streptomycin, 0.05 g L −1 , and chloramphenicol, 0.05 g L −1 ). All Petri dishes were incubated at 25 • C for 7 to 10 days under 12 h of light and 12 of darkness. Different colonies were tentatively identified based in morphology (Barnett and Hunter, 1955). Pure cultures were obtained from hyphal tip transfer to PDA media and maintained at 5 • C.

Isolation of Rhizospheric Fungi
For each plant, 1.5 g of soil in direct contact with roots was carefully collected. In a laminar flow bench, 13.5 ml of sterile distilled water was added, before vigorous agitation for 20 min in a horizontal position. After 5 min of decantation, serial dilutions of the supernatant were made. 10 −3 and 10 −4 dilutions were used to inoculate PDA, MEA, and AA. To all media streptomycin, 0.05 g L −1 and chloramphenicol, 0.05 g L −1 were added. Plates were incubated for 7 to 14 days at 25 • C.

Taxonomic Characterization of the Fungal Isolates
DNA extraction from cultivable isolated fungi (n = 387 isolates) was performed as described in Morales-Cruz et al. (2015), with the following modifications. Mycelium from 7 to 21 days old fungal cultures were frozen with 3 mm metal beads in tubes at −80 • C. Tubes were shaken vigorously with a vortex for 5 min at maximum speed. Disrupted mycelium were resuspended in 200 µL of nuclease-free sterile-distilled water and then homogenized in a vortex for 15 s. Mycelium was incubated at 100 • C for 10 min, followed by a centrifugation step at 14500 rpm for 2 min. An aliquot of 10 µL of the supernatant was used for the PCR runs. A 1:20 or 1:50 dilution was made in case of PCR inhibition occurred. ITS sequences were PCR amplified using ITS1 (TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC) primers (White et al., 1990). A 25 µL PCR reaction was carried out using 2.5 µL 1X Thermopol reaction buffer, 0.5 µL of 10 mM dNTPs, 0.5 µL of 10 µM ITS forward and reverse primers, 0.125 µL (1.25U/50 µL) Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, United States) and 10 µL of sample supernatant as a template. PCR reaction was performed with an initial denaturing step at 95 • C for 2 min, and 35 cycles of 95 • C for 30 s, 52 • C for 30 s (White et al., 1990), and 72 • C for 1 min, followed by a final extension phase at 72 • C for 5 min. The PCR product was purified and sequenced at Macrogen Inc., South Korea. Amplicon sequencing analysis was carried out with Geneious (R11.1). Taxonomic identities were determined with BLASTN using the UNITE database 7.2 (Nilsson et al., 2019).

Pathogenic Fungal Strains and Control Antagonists Origin
Isolates of Phaeomoniella chlamydospora (

Test of Fungal Antagonism
Initial assessment of antagonistic properties was conducted against D. seriata as pathogen. Further evaluations on selected antagonists were carried out using D. seriata, N. parvum, and P. chlamydospora. Agar disks from a 7-day old actively growing colony were used. Co-culture assays were performed placing a 5 mm agar disk on one side of the Petri dish with PDA (39 g L −1 ; Difco) or PA (200 g L −1 grapevine propagation material, 20 g L −1 agar) and on the opposite side a 5 mm agar disk containing the antagonist strain. Plates were incubated at 25 • C for 7-28 days in darkness (Badalyan et al., 2002) using a randomized complete block design. Registered bioproducts MAMULL and TIFI were used as antagonistic controls. Pathogen growth area was evaluated at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days postco-culture (Schindelin et al., 2012). Inhibition percentage was calculated using the pathogen growth area when was cultured alone (C) or in interaction with the antagonist (T) according to the formula I = [(C-T)/C) * 100] (Thampi and Suseela, 2017). An in planta assay was also performed. Annual shoots were used for the experimental set-up to verify the antagonistic FIGURE 1 | Annual shoots essay diagram. Shortly, shoots were inoculated with a spore suspension of the antagonist. Twenty-four hours later, the pathogen was inoculated on one side of the shoot and incubated in a humid chamber. After seven days, small pieces were taken and cultured in PDA plates. potential shown in plate co-culture. Several preliminary evaluations were carried out in order to test variability caused by autoclave sterilization of pruning material, humid-chamber moist maintenance, type of inoculum and time needed for the pathogen to grow through the wood piece. Even though tissue was dead, the overall shoot matrix structure was conserved after autoclave sterilization (data not shown). Internode portions of dormant cuttings were cut in 4.5 cm length pieces and then used fresh or autoclaved for 25 min at 121 • C. Agar mycelium plugs were evaluated as inoculum. In 2 days, pruning material in contact with the pathogen and/or antagonist plugs were covered in the mycelium. As the inoculum type was too different from a field inoculum, a spore suspension solution was used to inoculate the wood pieces. Mycelium/spore mix suspension FIGURE 2 | Taxonomic composition of the isolated fungi. Values are separated according to the source (A) and phytosanitary regime (pest management program, PM) (B,C). Cultured-isolates identified only to family level Nectriaceae (+) and class level Dothideomycetes ( * ) are also shown.
FIGURE 3 | Comparison of the growth area of antagonists and pathogens in two media. Growth was measured after 7 days in PDA (potato dextrose agar) and PA (plant agar). Bars with asterisk are significantly different from the control (Paired T test, P < 0.001). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean, n = 5.
Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org of the pathogens D. seriata and N. parvum were prepared by flooding 30 days old plant agar culture (PA; 200 g L −1 grapevine dormant cutting, 20 g L −1 agar) with sterile distilled water. In the case of the antagonists Clonostachys rosea (isolates CoS3/4.24, CoR2.15 and R31.6) a spore suspension adjusted to 1 × 10 7 conidia mL −1 was used. Antagonist inoculation was carried out adding 40 µL of antagonist fresh spore suspension until it reached the woody stem cut end by capillarity. Tebuconazole (60 mL/100 L fields recommended doses; SOLCHEM, Chile) or sterile distilled water was applied in the same manner as controls. This experiment was carried out 5 times. Woody stem cuts were incubated in individual humid chambers for 24 h (Figure 1). Then, 10 µL of fresh pathogen mycelium/spore mix suspension was inoculated on the same side where the antagonist was inoculated previously and immediately placed in a horizontal position, preventing suspension diffusion. Incubation was carried out in humid chambers for 3-7 days. Afterward, the surface of the woody stem was disinfected by rubbing with 70% ethanol. With a hot sterile scalp, the bark and 0.5 cm of the woody stem ends were removed. Small pieces located at 1 and 2.5 cm from the inoculation point were collected and cultured in individual PDA plates at 25 • C for 7 days. To evaluate the pathogen mycelium and spore suspension viability, 10 µL of the solution was inoculated in one side of the wooden piece as described above and immediately processed to obtain 3 mm pieces at 1 and 2.5 cm from the pathogen inoculation point.
Every piece was cultured in PDA at 25 • C for 7 days. The presence of the pathogen on PDA was evaluated under a light microscope.

Test of Antagonist Mechanism
To characterize the mechanism of antagonism, the same experimental setup of co-culture was carried out on water agar (AA, 20 g L −1 ; Difco) with a microscope sterile slide covered by a thin layer of the same agar in its surface. Using a light microscope (MOTIC BA410), the sample was screened for loops of the antagonist hyphae around N. parvum and D. seriata, indicating mycoparasitism. This experiment was carried out 3 times. To determine antibiosis as the type of antagonist mechanism used, isolated fungi E. nigrum R39.1, C. rosea CoS3/4.4, and Cladosporium sp. B38d.2 were cultured in PDA plates (39 g L −1 ; Difco) over cellophane paper for 7 days. Cellophane paper with the fungal colony was then removed from the plate and a mycelium plug of D. seriata or N. parvum was placed in the center. Plates were incubated for 7 days at 25 • C and pathogen growth was evaluated. This experiment was carried out three times.

Isolation and Identification of Endophytic and Rhizospheric Fungi
A total of 102 vineyard samples were collected to isolate endophytic and rhizospheric fungi associated with grapevines in Chile. Endophytic fungi were isolated from woody shoots, sprouts, and roots, while the rhizosphere ones were obtained from the soil in direct contact with the roots. Of these 102 samples, ninety were obtained from commercial vineyards in the central valleys of Chile and twelve from a vineyard in the Codpa Valley that has not been managed for disease protection for over 150 years. From these samples, a total of 221 and 166 morphologically different fungi were isolated from the commercial vineyards and the non-commercial Codpa Valley plants, respectively. Fungi were characterized taxonomically using ITS1 and ITS4 sequences. All fungal sequences were at least 98% identical to the best BLASTn hit in the UNITE database. We could assign taxonomy to a total of 300 isolates. The ITS sequence was discriminant at the species level for 227 isolates. The remaining were assigned to the corresponding genus or family. A total of 58 genera were represented, 37 and 38 among rhizospheric and endophytic fungi, respectively. As expected, below ground samples (rhizosphere and roots) were more diverse (56 genera) than sprouts and woody stems (5 genera) (Figure 2).
To assess the antagonistic ability of the ten selected isolates, we co-cultured each one of them with D. seriata and N. parvum, two of the main fungi causing GTDs in Chile. Co-cultures were carried out on two different types of growth media: the commonly used potato dextrose agar (PDA) and a substrate made of agar and ground woody grapevine tissue aka, grapevine plant agar (PA)] that simulates in planta nutrient composition (Massonnet et al., 2017). Isolates displayed a wide range of growth rates, which often differed between PDA and PA (Figure 3). Interestingly, most endophytes, including all C. rosea isolates, grew faster on PA than PDA. Different growth rates reflected the patterns of inhibition of D. seriata and N. parvum (Figures 4, 5). The Trichoderma Altair isolate grew faster than the rest on PDA and reached its maximum inhibitory effect on both pathogens as early as day 7 in PDA. Growth inhibition only occurred upon physical contact between colonies of Trichoderma sp. and the pathogens. The faster growth on PA of the endophytes Clonostachys, Chaetomium, Epicoccum, and Cladosporium was associated with greater pathogen inhibition rates on this substrate compared to PDA, especially for the Clonostachys isolates. In PA, C. rosea overgrew the pathogen colony at least 7 days earlier than in PDA. All C. rosea strains inhibited over 98% pathogen growth in PA at day 21 ( Figure 5). Chaetomium sp. S34.6 isolate inhibited pathogen growth by slowly growing in the plate until colony contact. By day 21 Chaetomium sp. S34.6 inhibited D. seriata and N. parvum growth by 59.1% and 86.75%, respectively, about two-fold the pathogen growth inhibition showed in PDA. Both species completely overgrew both pathogen colonies around 28 days. The antagonistic effect of C. rosea R36.1 and CoS3/4.24 occurred upon direct contact between colonies, which overgrew the pathogen colony within 21 days of growth. Instead, pathogen growth inhibition of C. rosea CoR2.15, Purpureocillium lilacinum S36.1, and E. nigrum R29.1 happened without evident physical contact between colonies. In PDA, E. nigrum produced a wide 0.8 to 1.2 cm orange-colored halo that was partially colonized only by N. parvum after 21 days of growth. The slow and limited growth of Neofusicoccum parvum was also visible in the halo produced by Purpureocillium. Cladosporium sp. B38d.2 showed an interesting difference in antagonist activity against N. parvum in PA, reaching its higher inhibition rate (Figure 5). When cultured with this pathogen, Cladosporium strongly sporulated, covering the entire plate, and stopped N. parvum early growth.
On PA, C. rosea inhibited P. chlamydospora almost completely (99.9%). Interestingly, C. rosea growth first paused without evident contact between colonies (Figure 6) at day 7, but later, by 14 days, it overgrew completely the pathogen colony. Overgrowth was also observed with Trichoderma sp. Altair in PDA.

Characterization of the Mechanisms of Antagonism
The antagonistic activity of endophytic biocontrol agents can depend on the competition for nutrients and induced resistance in the plant, and/or direct interaction with the release of pathogen inhibitory compounds or mycoparasitism (White et al., 1997;Arnold et al., 2001;Köhl et al., 2015). During co-culture, isolates of C. rosea showed pathogen inhibition both before and after direct contact between colonies, suggesting that both mechanisms could underlie its antagonistic properties. To evaluate the mode of action of C. rosea and Trichoderma sp. Altair, we studied under a light microscope the mycelium in the zone of interspecific interaction. For C. rosea CoS3/4.24 and R36.1, hyphal coiling, a sign of mycoparasitism, was consistently observed in all co-cultures with N. parvum and D. seriata (Figure 7). Hyphal coiling was only occasionally found in Trichoderma sp. Altair.
When C. rosea rhizosphere strain CoS3/4.24 was co-cultured with D. seriata or N. parvum, pathogen growth terminated before direct contact with C. rosea in correspondence of the halo surrounding the antagonist. In this case, the inhibitory activity of C. rosea may depend on a secreted antibiotic compound. This was also observed when Cladosporium sp. B38d.2 was used as antagonist. To test the inhibitory activity of the C. rosea secretome, we inoculated C. rosea on a sterilized cellophane membrane overlaid on PDA and incubated for seven days. The cellophane membrane was shown to be permeable to metabolites secreted by fungi (Dennis and Webster, 1971;Chambers, 1993;Sharmini et al., 2004;Rodriguez et al., 2011). After removing the cellophane membrane together with the C. rosea mycelium, we inoculated the plates with pathogens and measured their growth in comparison with normal PDA. Pathogen growth was significantly reduced on plates previously incubated with C. rosea, likely due to the secreted metabolites that permeated through the cellophane membrane (Figure 8). The inhibition caused by the secreted metabolites of C. rosea CoS3/4.24 led to a 47.2% and 50.1% reduction in growth of D. seriata and N. parvum, respectively. In the case of Cladosporium sp., 34.26% and 42.46% inhibition was observed against N. parvum Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org FIGURE 8 | Pathogen growth over secondary metabolites produced by antagonists C. rosea CoS3/4.24, Cladosporium sp. B38d.2 in PDA. Bars with asterisk are significantly different to the control (Tukey's test, P < 0.001). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean, n = 5. and D. seriata, respectively. Changes in the pathogen colony morphology were also observed, especially when in contact with C. rosea CoS3/4.24 isolate secondary metabolites. N. parvum colony turned into several flat independent colonies with undulate margins, while D. seriata grew as one colony with irregular shape.

Effect of Fungal Antagonists on the Growth of GTD Fungi in One-Year old Grapevine Woody Shoots
As both growth and inhibition rates of GTD pathogens were significantly different in media containing grapevine annual shoot extract (plant agar, PA), we extended the testing of antagonism by using one-year-old lignified shoots (aka canes) as a substrate for co-cultures. We tested both sterile (autoclaved) and non-sterile canes. After 7 days, C. rosea, N. parvum, and D. seriata colonized completely the internal tissue of 4.5 cmlong autoclaved canes. The antagonists C. rosea strains were recovered in all pathogen co-inoculated samples after 7 days (Figure 9). No pathogen growth was observed at 0.5 cm from the pathogen inoculation point when treated with the antagonists. Interestingly, under the same conditions, Tebuconazole, a commercial synthetic fungicide, did not reduce D. seriata nor N. parvum growth.
We also performed the co-culture experiments on canes that were not subjected to autoclaving. Pathogens colonized the entire cane in 7 days in absence of any antagonist. In less than 0.1% and 10% of the co-culture assays, N. parvum and D. seriata were recovered from plant tissue previously inoculated with C. rosea isolates, respectively. In the case of CoS3/4.24 isolate, N. parvum and D. seriata growth inhibition was observed in 80% and 100% of the assays, respectively. In summary, the antagonistic potential of the C. rosea isolates shown in agar plate was confirmed in grapevine propagation material.

DISCUSSION
We isolated fungi from asymptomatic grapevines to find potential biocontrol agents against GTDs. As they share the same host with pathogens, these fungi may provide longer-lasting protection of grapevine tissues than biocontrol agents identified on other plant species (Zabalgogeazcoa, 2008;Latz et al., 2018). Three hundred eighty-seven different fungi and yeast were isolated and identified from multiple grapevine tissues and pest management systems. The observed diversity was limited to culturable fungi, since no cultivation-independent identification tools were applied. Taxa were determined solely based on the ITS sequence. Further validation using other informative sites, such as nu-SU-0817-59 and nu-SU-1196-39 (Borneman and Hartin, 2000) or TEF-1a (Ichi-Ishi and Inoue, 2005), would provide additional resolution for some of the isolates we were not able to characterize at the species level. As expected, rhizospheric soil showed to hold more fungal diversity than roots, and sprouts showed less cultivable diversity than any other sample. This was in agreement with previous studies using amplicon sequencing (Tan et al., 2017).
As the focus of this work was to find microorganisms able to colonize the grapevine persistently, we conducted this search during late Winter, at the beginning of the cold and wet season, when potentially beneficial microorganisms may compete with pathogens for the colonization of the host through pruning wounds (Arnold et al., 2003;Rolshausen et al., 2010;Travadon et al., 2016). Even if we could collect more samples from commercial vineyards than from the 150 year-old vines in the Codpa valley, the number of fungal taxa isolated from Codpa was higher than in commercial vineyards. The greater diversity found in Codpa might be due to the older age of the vines as well as the lack of pathogen control practices throughout the life of the vineyard, even if other cultural management practices as fertilization with animal manure have been done over generations. All fungi we isolated, characterized, and tested, with the exception of Epicoccum nigrum showed a significant growth inhibition of N. parvum and D. seriata in co-cultures on both PDA and PA. The Trichoderma Altair isolate and all C. rosea strains completely overgrew both pathogens by day 21. This was also observed against the pathogen P. chlamydospora in PA. However, variable biocontrol efficacy was observed between different isolates of the same species, as reported in Inch and Gilbert (2007). For example, the rhizosphere isolate C. rosea CoS3/4.24 grew faster on media and overgrew the pathogen earlier than the other C. rosea isolates. In contrast, the endophytic isolates of C. rosea showed better inhibition of N. parvum in grapevine woodie shoots. The endophytic isolate of Cladosporium also displayed antagonism in co-culture, in particular against N. parvum on PA. Its inhibitory activity seemed to be due to the high sporulation rate and not to the rapid growth of the mycelium observed in others (Schöneberg et al., 2015). Cladosporium sp. produces a great amount of black, hydrophobic spores, and a small mycelium underneath the dense spore mass. On PA as well as PDA, Chaetomium sp. showed a significant reduction of growth of N. parvum and D. seriata, although weaker than that of Trichoderma. The antagonistic activity of Chaetomium may be due to a slow mycoparasitism. Hyphae of Chaetomium has been described to penetrate and coil around pathogen hyphae at day 30 of co-culture (Hung et al., 2015). Strains of Chaetomium have also shown antagonist activity against different pathogens as Phytophthora nicotianae (Hung et al., 2015), Rhizoctonia solani (Gao et al., 2005) and Fusarium oxysporum (Huu Phong et al., 2016) among others. Some strains presented antibiosis as an antagonist strategy, but mycoparasitism has been also described for this genus (Hung et al., 2015).
Clonostachys rosea showed limited antagonism at early stages of co-culture on artificial media and completely inhibited pathogen growth only after 21 days. Importantly, C. rosea was particularly effective against pathogen colonization of autoclaved woodie shoots. Fungal growth dynamics and therefore, the interaction between colonies are likely influenced by the type of media (Schöneberg et al., 2015), in particular when nutrientrich media are compared with substrates poor in nutrients, such as PA and woodie tissue. It is worth noting that different isolates displayed different antagonistic activities depending on the substrate. For example, C. rosea isolates R36.1 and CoR2.15 showed higher pathogen inhibition than CoS3/4.24 on woodie shoots that were not autoclaved. Interestingly, R36.1 and CoR2.15 were endophytic, while CoS3/4.24 was isolated from the rhizosphere. Although we did not find the same pattern when autoclaved tissue was used, the different behavior of endophytic and rhizospheric isolates supports the overall strategy to search for potential biocontrol agents among the natural inhabitants of grapevines.
Generally recognized control mechanisms for fungal biocontrol agents are (1) competition for nutrients and space, (2) induced resistance in the plant, both consisting in an indirect interaction with the pathogen, (3) inhibition through antibiosis, and (4) mycoparasitism (Latz et al., 2018;Köhl et al., 2019). The formation of short loops of the antagonist's hyphae around hyphae from another fungal species also called hyphal coiling (Barnett and Lilly, 1962;Assante et al., 2004;Gao et al., 2005). The coiling establishes an intimate contact with the parasitized hypha, penetrating the hypha and delivering antibiotic compounds and cell-wall degrading enzymes (Barnett and Lilly, 1962). This type of mycoparasitism has been commonly found in the genus Trichoderma (Howell, 2003;Benítez et al., 2004) and reported in C. rosea (Barnett and Lilly, 1962;Morandi et al., 2001). The Trichoderma sp. Altair isolate produced hyphal coils and also the C. rosea strains we tested. In all cases, we found a strong correlation between coiling and antagonism suggesting that mycoparasitism plays an important role in the interaction with the pathogens. In the case of C. rosea CoS3/4.24, a yellowish halo around the antagonist colony was present. Antibiosis was previously described for this species (Iqbal et al., 2017), but not all strains of the species show antibiotic production (Moraga-Suazo et al., 2016). Further studies should be performed with the C. rosea isolates to dissect the role of secondary metabolite production in pathogen growth inhibition and endophytic establishment in the grapevine as this might have important applications in agro-industrial areas (Karlsson et al., 2015). Direct interaction with the pathogen mode of action, as mycoparasitism and antibiosis, are highly desirable mechanisms for further production of commercial biocontrol agents, as they expose lower risks of human, plant and environmental toxicity (Köhl et al., 2019).

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
IS-V was in charge of performing all experiments, developing and testing innovative evaluations, and writing the manuscript draft. DT gave strong support doing the experiments. MM gave guidance in the early steps of paper writing. ML and GD provided the pathogen fungi and Trichoderma sp. Altair isolates for evaluations, and some advice in project development and paper writing. DC gave invaluable and robust advice in paper writing. He also edited the manuscript a significant number of times. AC was in charge of the R&D department and the laboratory. He provided the first idea and gave guidance in every part of the project, generating the contacts for the development of this project. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.