<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.655515</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of Biogas Slurry Combined With Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition in a Paddy Field</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Hanlin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/958917/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Shuangxi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Xianqing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Juanqin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Naling</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Haiyun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>Weiguang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Eco-environmental Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Agricultural Environment and Farmland Conservation Experiment Station of Ministry Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Shanghai Key Laboratory of Horticultural Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Marc Gregory Dumont, University of Southampton, United Kingdom</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Sreenivas Rao Ravella, Aberystwyth University, United Kingdom; Yong Li, Zhejiang University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Weiguang Lv, <email>lvweiguang@saas.sh.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Terrestrial Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>655515</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Zhang, Li, Zheng, Zhang, Bai, Zhang and Lv.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhang, Li, Zheng, Zhang, Bai, Zhang and Lv</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer in paddy fields can be a practical method to reduce the environmental risk and utilize the nutrients of biogas slurry. The responses of bacterial and fungal communities to the application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer are important reflections of the quality of the ecological environment. In this study, based on a 3-year field experiment with different ratios of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer (applying the same pure nitrogen amount), the Illumina MiSeq platform was used to investigate the bacterial and fungal community diversity and composition in paddy soil. Our results revealed that compared with the observations under regular chemical fertilization, on the basis of stable paddy yield, the application of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly enhanced the soil nutrient availability and bacterial community diversity and reduced the fungal community diversity. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), DOC/SOC (soil organic carbon), available nitrogen (AN) and available phosphorus (AP) were positively correlated with the bacterial community diversity, but no soil property was significantly associated with the fungal community. The bacterial community was primarily driven by the application of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer (40.78%), while the fungal community was almost equally affected by the addition of pure biogas slurry, chemical fertilizer and biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer (25.65&#x2013;28.72%). Biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly enriched <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Acidobacteria</italic>, <italic>Planctomycetes</italic>, <italic>Rokubacteria</italic>, and <italic>Ascomycota</italic> and depleted <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, <italic>Crenarchaeota</italic>, <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>, and <italic>Glomeromycota</italic>. The observation of the alteration of some bacteria- and fungus-specific taxa provides insights for the proper application of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer, which has the potential to promote crop growth and inhibit pathogens.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>paddy soil</kwd>
<kwd>biogas slurry</kwd>
<kwd>chemical fertilizer</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial community</kwd>
<kwd>fungal community</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Key Research and Development Program of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012166</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="51"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>With the rapid development of modern agriculture, much agricultural waste has been produced. Biogas projects are considered to be an effective method for the anaerobic digestion of animal manure or crop straws and have been widely used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abubaker et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). In China, 110,473 biogas projects (including 6,972 large-scale biogas projects) were performed in 2016, and 139,295 biogas projects (including 10,122 large-scale biogas projects) are expected to be implemented in 2020 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">National Development and Reform Commission and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China (NDRCMARAPRC), 2017</xref>). Biogas projects effectively solve the problem of agricultural waste recycling, but a large amount of biogas slurry is produced as a byproduct. Biogas slurry entering the environment without proper treatment can cause serious water and air pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Nkoa, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Insam et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to its associated environmental risk, biogas slurry is rich in nutrients and trace elements and can be used as a kind of high-quality organic fertilizer that is generally applied directly or combined with other fertilizer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">M&#x00F6;ller and M&#x00FC;ller, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Baral et al., 2017</xref>). Previous studies have shown that appropriate use of biogas slurry can increase soil nutrients, enhance crop nutritional quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, decrease crop disease and have other benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Terhoeven-Urselmans et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Louro et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang L. et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu M. et al., 2019</xref>). However, the excessive application of biogas slurry will also cause some negative effects, such as the pollution of surface water and groundwater due to excessive nutrient input, the risk of heavy metal and organic pollutant accumulation in the soil, and the reduction of crop yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bian et al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Zhang et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cheng et al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, it is important and necessary to explore appropriate methods for biogas slurry application in agricultural systems.</p>
<p>Bacterial and fungal community diversity is a widely used ecological indicator that can reflect the quality of the ecological environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bell et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gonthier et al., 2014</xref>). Some previous studies have shown that the use of biogas slurry can significantly affect the soil microbial community. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu M. et al. (2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Xu Z. et al. (2019)</xref> found that a moderate dose of pure biogas slurry application could positively affect the soil bacterial diversity in rice-rape rotation systems, with too much or too little application showing the opposite result. The results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abubaker et al. (2012)</xref> showed that biogas residues increased the microbial activity in wheat soil. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Wentzel et al. (2015)</xref> observed that the application of biogas slurry as fertilizer reduced soil microbial activity and that the ratio of fungal C to bacterial C decreased with increasing soil clay content. In an incubation experiment performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Johansen et al. (2013)</xref>, digested materials only slightly altered the soil microbial community composition. The effect of biogas slurry addition on the soil microbial community was not consistent and depended on various factors, such as the application method, usage dose, soil type, and crop type. Bacteria and fungi strongly interact and cooperate with one another in the soil nutrient cycle, and they play important roles in ecological function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang H. et al., 2018</xref>). Although much research has been performed, few reports have addressed both bacterial and fungal community alterations following biogas slurry application. It is helpful to optimize and enhance the application of biogas slurry by studying the effects of different measures on soil bacterial and fungal communities.</p>
<p>In order to realize the ecological treatment of a large amount of biogas slurry, using biogas slurry to irrigate paddy fields can meet the needs of rice growth in terms of water and a large number of nutrient elements. It can also facilitate the reduction in the treatment of and enhance the resource utilization of biogas slurry. Therefore, biogas slurry is widely used as an organic fertilizer in paddy fields in China. We hypothesized that there will be one ratio between biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer which exerts more suitable impact on the growth of bacteria and fungi than the others, thus changing soil nutrient cycling efficiency and crop production. In this study, based on a 3-year field experiment involving the application of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer in a rice-fallow rotation system, the Illumina MiSeq approach was employed to investigate the associated bacterial and fungal community diversity and composition. The aims of this study were to (1) identify the shifts in bacterial and fungal community diversity and composition, (2) associate the functions of particular taxa with specific biogas slurry application approaches, and (3) under the premise of a stable or increasing yield of rice, provide scientific support for the efficient and environmental utilization of biogas slurry. The results of this study may be useful for efficient recycling of biogas slurry and ecological paddy production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Site Description and Experimental Design</title>
<p>The experimental area of this study is located at the Shanghai farm, Dafeng city, Jiangsu Province (33&#x00B0;32&#x2032; N, 120&#x00B0;54&#x2032; E). The annual average temperature and precipitation in this area are 14 degrees and 1,042 mm, respectively. The annual sunshine duration is 2,239 h. The soil was derived from a reclaimed yellow beach, and its type is sandy loam. Soil properties before the experiment was conducted included a pH of 8.71, soil organic carbon (SOC) of 8.36 g/kg, total nitrogen (TN) of 1.02 g/kg, and total phosphorus (TP) of 0.89 g/kg.</p>
<p>A rice-fallow rotation system was adopted in the experimental area. The experiment began in the rice season of 2015 and ended after the rice harvest in 2017. Six treatments were performed in triplicate under a randomized block design: regular chemical fertilizer treatment (RT, with pure chemical fertilizer application), biogas slurry replacing 25% chemical fertilizer (BS25), biogas slurry replacing 50% chemical fertilizer (BS50), biogas slurry replacing 75% chemical fertilizer (BS75), biogas slurry replacing 100% chemical fertilizer (BS100) and no fertilizer control (CK). The fertilizer dose applied during the rice season was the same in every treatment and based on the local regime, which was pure nitrogen at 225 kg/ha, phosphorus at 16.4 kg/ha, and the application was repeated every year (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The area of one replicate was 833 m<sup>2</sup>, and the replicates were separated by a soil ridge with an impermeable membrane.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Amounts of fertilizer and biogas slurry applied in the experimental area.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Biogas slurry t<sup>.</sup>ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Urea kg<sup>.</sup>ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Ca(H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub><sup>.</sup> H<sub>2</sub>O kg<sup>.</sup>ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total N kg<sup>.</sup>ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> kg<sup>.</sup>ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">490</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">500</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">367.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">485</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">245</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">470</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">122.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">455</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">196</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">440</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
<p>The biogas slurry originated from the pig manure anaerobic fermentation tank on the Shanghai farm and was stored and precipitated in the storage pool. The supernatant of the biogas slurry entered the paddy field through the cement irrigation ditch with irrigation water. The total water volume was also consistent for each treatment. The properties of the biogas slurry were determined and calculated for each application. The average values of the applied biogas slurry were pH: 7.96 &#x00B1; 0.12, TN: 1501.4 &#x00B1; 82.5 mg/L, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N: 1378.6 &#x00B1; 71.1 mg/L, TP: 62.29 &#x00B1; 3.3 mg/L, total potassium (TK): 815.3 &#x00B1; 37.9 mg/L, CODcr: 5151.5 &#x00B1; 274.5 mg/L, Cu: 1.84 &#x00B1; 0.07 mg/L, Zn: 3.96 &#x00B1; 0.11 mg/L, Pb: 0.10 &#x00B1; 0.02 mg/L, and Cd: 0.02 &#x00B1; 0.01 mg/L.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Soil Sampling and Chemical Analysis</title>
<p>Soil samples were collected on November 13, 2017, after the rice harvest, when the weather in Shanghai was relatively dry (no rainfall) and the temperature was generally stable (12&#x2013;18&#x00B0;C). The top-layer soil samples (0&#x2013;20 cm) were randomly collected with a soil sampler from 10 points in each replicate and thoroughly mixed into a single sample. The soil samples were stored in sterilized, sealed polyethylene bags and immediately transported to the laboratory. One portion of the samples was freeze dried for soil property measurement, and the other portion was stored at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for DNA extraction and high-throughput sequencing analysis.</p>
<p>Soil pH was determined with a pH meter (with a soil:water ratio of 2.5:1); SOC and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were simultaneously measured with a multi N/C 3,000 total organic carbon analyzer (Analytik Jena AG, Germany); soil TN and available nitrogen (AN) were determined according to the Kjeldahl method (extracted by 2 M KCl); soil TP was determined using the molybdenum-blue colorimetry method (dissolved by 5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>), and available phosphorus (AP) was determined using the molybdenum blue method (extracted by 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>); Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb were measured with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AA6880, Shimadzu, Japan).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>High-Throughput Sequencing</title>
<p>Total genomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil using the PowerSoil<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> DNA Isolation Kit (12888, MoBio, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The concentration and quality of the extracted DNA was measured with a K5500 Micro-Spectrophotometer (Beijing, China). The bacterium-biased primer sets 515F (5&#x2032;-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG-3&#x2032;) and 907R (5&#x2032;-CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT-3&#x2032;) were used for amplification of V3-V4 variance fragments of 16S rRNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zhou et al., 2011</xref>). The fungus-specific primer set ITS5 (5&#x2032;-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3&#x2032;) and ITS4 (5&#x2032;-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3&#x2032;) was applied for the amplification of the fungal gene in the ITS1 regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Schoch et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The PCR amplifications were performed using an Applied Biosystems ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR instrument under the following cycling conditions: for the 16S V4-V5 rRNA genes, 30 s denaturation at 98&#x00B0;C, followed by 25 cycles of 98&#x00B0;C for 15 s, 50&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and 72&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and an extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 7 min; for the ITS1 genes, 30 s of initial denaturation at 98&#x00B0;C, followed by 35 cycles of 98&#x00B0;C for 15 s, 50&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and 72&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and an extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 7 min. The PCR products were checked with a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform at Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).</p>
<p>Raw sequences were subjected to quality control and assigned to unique 10-bp barcodes using QIIME software (version 1.7.0). The remaining sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the level of 97% sequence similarity. Then, the sequences were annotated through BLAST with the RDP and Unite databases (for bacteria and fungi) using QIIME software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Caporaso and Gordon, 2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>The bacterial and fungal richness, diversity and evenness indices (Chao1, abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE), and Shannon and Simpson indices) were calculated using Mothur (version v.1.30.1). One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey&#x2019;s HSD tests was performed to identify significant differences among the treatments using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS IBM Corp). Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed to detect the bacterial and fungal community differences among the treatments based on the OTU results using R software (version 3.5.1<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup>). The species leading to significant differences in the bacterial and fungal communities were revealed using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe). Data on soil bacterial and fungal community structure were used to test the effects of fertilization and biogas slurry application using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMAVONA). In this study, the 25 most abundant bacterial and fungal OTUs from the soil samples were used to construct the networks. The data used in network construction conformed to irhoi &#x003E;0.6 and <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01 in the Spearman correlation analysis, and the network plots were generated using R (version 3.5.1, iGraph and qgraph packages).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Soil Property Characteristics and Rice Yields</title>
<p>Compared to the values in RT, all the treatments involving biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly increased the SOC, DOC, SOC/DOC, AN and AP by 7.53, 53.30, 42.59, 11.97, and 7.62% on average, respectively, and significantly decreased the pH by 0.19 on average (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The contents of DOC, AN, and AP were the highest under the treatments BS50 and BS75. In addition, SOC under BS50 and SOC/DOC under BS75 were significantly higher than those in the other treatments. The soil TN and TP contents showed no significant differences among the treatments.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Soil properties associated with the rice harvest after 5 years of treatment application.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>pH</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>SOC g<sup>.</sup>kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>DOC mg<sup>.</sup>kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>DOC/SOC %</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>TN g<sup>.</sup>kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>TP g<sup>.</sup>kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>AN mg<sup>.</sup>kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>AP mg<sup>.</sup>kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup></bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.63 &#x00B1; 0.09c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.41 &#x00B1; 0.45c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.38 &#x00B1; 2.05c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.63 &#x00B1; 0.45c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92 &#x00B1; 0.09b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.84 &#x00B1; 0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.61 &#x00B1; 2.02d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.75 &#x00B1; 0.73d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.81 &#x00B1; 0.07a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.32 &#x00B1; 0.40c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.84 &#x00B1; 1.86d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.79 &#x00B1; 0.39d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.05 &#x00B1; 0.11a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95 &#x00B1; 0.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.19 &#x00B1; 1.81c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.33 &#x00B1; 0.82c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.76 &#x00B1; 0.04b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.75 &#x00B1; 0.27b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.60 &#x00B1; 2.37b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.70 &#x00B1; 0.58b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.04 &#x00B1; 0.10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94 &#x00B1; 0.12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.57 &#x00B1; 1.92b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.92 &#x00B1; 0.74b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.55 &#x00B1; 0.08d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.47 &#x00B1; 0.42a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.68 &#x00B1; 2.44a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.72 &#x00B1; 0.61b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.03 &#x00B1; 0.12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93 &#x00B1; 0.10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.31 &#x00B1; 2.33a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.85 &#x00B1; 0.93a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.56 &#x00B1; 0.06d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.62 &#x00B1; 0.32b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.95 &#x00B1; 1.96a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.07 &#x00B1; 0.53a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.04 &#x00B1; 0.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94 &#x00B1; 0.07a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.23 &#x00B1; 2.14a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.18 &#x00B1; 0.80a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.66 &#x00B1; 0.09c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.57 &#x00B1; 0.53bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.94 &#x00B1; 2.18b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.76 &#x00B1; 0.51b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.05 &#x00B1; 0.10a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93 &#x00B1; 0.06a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.36 &#x00B1; 1.87b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.09 &#x00B1; 0.64b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>SOC, soil organic C; DOC, dissolved organic C; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; AN, available nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus.</italic></attrib>
<attrib><italic>Values in the table are the mean &#x00B1; SE; different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In contrast, there was no significant difference between RT and the treatments of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer in terms of rice yield over the 3 years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Compared with that under the BS100 treatment, biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer increased the rice yield by 8.75&#x2013;11.67%, 13.25&#x2013;19.82%, and 10.11&#x2013;16.30% in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Rice yields in different treatments during 2015&#x2013;2017. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences at <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-655515-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Bacterial and Fungal &#x03B1; Diversity and the Correlation With Soil Properties</title>
<p>Bacterial and fungal &#x03B1; diversity was notably affected by the different fertilization regimes. Chao1 and ACE were used as richness indices, and the Shannon index was employed as the diversity index. Chao1 and ACE for the bacterial community under the treatments with biogas slurry were significantly higher than those under RT, and BS50 and BS75 had the highest values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The Shannon index of the bacterial community under BS50 and BS75 was also significantly higher than that under RT (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). In contrast, compared with RT, the treatments with biogas slurry significantly decreased the Chao1, ACE and Shannon index values for the fungal community, and BS50 and BS75 had significantly higher values of these indices than BS25 and BS100 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Richness and diversity indices of bacteria and fungi in different treatments.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Treatment</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Chao1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>ACE</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Shannon</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2496.03 &#x00B1; 224.62c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2840.01 &#x00B1; 273.02c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.38 &#x00B1; 0.07c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">RT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2561.64 &#x00B1; 176.64c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2874.86 &#x00B1; 189.86c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.38 &#x00B1; 0.11c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3052.13 &#x00B1; 294.05b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3108.70 &#x00B1; 257.39b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.45 &#x00B1; 0.03b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3201.37 &#x00B1; 114.02a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3412.32 &#x00B1; 157.18a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.53 &#x00B1; 0.10a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3329.44 &#x00B1; 140.25a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3496.03 &#x00B1; 225.41a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.55 &#x00B1; 0.13a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3105.08 &#x00B1; 168.38b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3287.81 &#x00B1; 159.78b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.48 &#x00B1; 0.09ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fungi</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">603.02 &#x00B1; 63.95d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">603.12 &#x00B1; 72.42d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.31 &#x00B1; 0.32c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">RT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">921.88 &#x00B1; 52.77a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">927.46 &#x00B1; 47.68a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.24 &#x00B1; 0.28a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">720.34 &#x00B1; 85.34c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">722.29 &#x00B1; 57.29c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.38 &#x00B1; 0.49c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">781.14 &#x00B1; 77.74b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">769.76 &#x00B1; 81.82b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.78 &#x00B1; 0.33b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">765.77 &#x00B1; 73.77b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">760.15 &#x00B1; 88.15b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.01 &#x00B1; 0.46b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">708.72 &#x00B1; 66.96c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">707.59 &#x00B1; 74.69c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.35 &#x00B1; 0.35c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>Values in the table are the mean &#x00B1; SE; different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The results of the correlation analysis between the soil properties and the bacterial and fungal richness and diversity indices are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>. The Chao1, ACE and Shannon index values of the bacterial community were significantly positively correlated with the DOC, DOC/SOC, AN, and AP. However, there were no significant correlations between the soil properties and the richness and diversity index values of the fungal community.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Correlations between soil properties and microbial richness and diversity indices.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><bold>Bacteria</bold><hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><bold>Fungi</bold><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Items</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Chao1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>ACE</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Shannon</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Chao1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>ACE</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Shannon</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.509</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.648</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.675</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.402</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.450</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SOC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.561</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.578</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.612</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.029</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DOC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.843&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.805&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.820&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.281</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.323</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.272</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DOC/SOC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.841&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.787&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.794&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.362</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.396</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;0.333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.539</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.471</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.425</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.646</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.637</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.401</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.504</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.432</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.399</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.715</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.706</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.501</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.842&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.876&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.883&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.257</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.212</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.356</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.869&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.892&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.895&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.235</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.191</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.312</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic>&#x002A;&#x002A;Significant at the 0.01 level (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), &#x002A;significant at the 0.05 level (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition</title>
<p>The relative abundances of the main soil bacterial taxa are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>. <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, and <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> (in successive order) were the dominant phyla in the paddy soil across all treatments, accounting for 67.52&#x2013;70.22% of the total bacterial sequence data. The other phyla with substantial relative abundances (1&#x2013;10%) were <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> (6.46&#x2013;7.82%), <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> (5.04&#x2013;5.80%), <italic>Gemmatimonadetes</italic> (3.55&#x2013;4.83%), <italic>Planctomycetes</italic> (3.12&#x2013;4.12%), <italic>Nitrospirae</italic> (1.91&#x2013;2.54%), <italic>Rokubacteria</italic> (0.74&#x2013;1.43%), <italic>Firmicutes</italic> (0.9&#x2013;1.26%) and <italic>Crenarchaeota</italic> (0.59&#x2013;1.61%). Among these, compared to those in RT, the relative abundances of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Acidobacteria</italic>, <italic>Planctomycetes</italic>, and <italic>Rokubacteria</italic> significantly increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) by 0.82&#x2013;3.82%, 16.34&#x2013;22.92%, 5.73&#x2013;18.05%, and 15.22&#x2013;56.52%, respectively, under the treatments involving biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer, while the relative abundances of <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, and <italic>Crenarchaeota</italic> were significantly reduced (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) by 7.77&#x2013;10.82%, 14.19&#x2013;17.39%, and 37.27&#x2013;63.35%, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Phylogenetic classification of dominant bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> phyla and their summarized phyla with statistical differences in different treatments. Different letters at each phylum indicate significant differences at <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 according to the LSD test.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-655515-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The relative abundances of the main soil fungal taxa are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>. <italic>Ascomycota</italic>, <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>, and <italic>Zoopagomycota</italic> (in successive order) were the dominant phyla in the paddy soil across all treatments, accounting for 68.91&#x2013;81.82% of the total fungal sequence data. The other phyla with substantial relative abundances (1&#x2013;10%) were <italic>Olpidiomycota</italic> (0.24&#x2013;5.19%), <italic>Rozellomycota</italic> (1.16&#x2013;3.27%), and <italic>Glomeromycota</italic> (0.52&#x2013;1.29%). Among these, compared with their relative abundances in RT, the treatments with biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly promoted <italic>Ascomycota</italic> by 20.51&#x2013;31.59% (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) and significantly decreased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>, <italic>Glomeromycota</italic>, and <italic>Rozellomycota</italic> by 26.66&#x2013;62.41%, 30.23&#x2013;59.69%, and 6.23&#x2013;37.05%, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Comparison of Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition Among the Different Treatments</title>
<p>Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was applied to identify differences in bacterial and fungal groups among the different fertilization regimes. Twenty-four bacterial communities had LDA scores greater than 3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). The distribution of bacterial communities with significant phylogenetic differences was as follows: 6 at the phylum level, 5 at the class level, 4 at the order level, 5 at the family level and 4 at the genus level. Among these, 16 communities were from the treatments including biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer. Only 3 communities had LDA scores greater than 4, which were <italic>Subgroup_6</italic> (class of <italic>Acidobacteria</italic>) under BS100, <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> under BS75 and <italic>Chloroflexi</italic> under CK. Six fungal communities had LDA scores greater than 3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). The distribution of fungal communities with significant phylogenetic differences was 4 at the family level and 2 at the genus level. Among these communities, 3 were from RT, which had the highest number. Four fungal taxa had LDA scores greater than 4: <italic>Genea</italic> (genus of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>) under BS100, <italic>Chaetomiaceae</italic> (family of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>) under BS75, <italic>Tricholomataceae</italic> (family of <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>) under BS50 and <italic>Pyronemataceae</italic> (family of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>) under RT.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>LEfSe analysis of the most differentially abundant bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> taxa in the soil samples (LDA score &#x003E;3).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-655515-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Bacterial and Fungal Community Structure and Determinants</title>
<p>The PLS-DA analysis showed that the composition of bacterial communities under CK and RT was distinctly separated from that under the treatments with biogas slurry along the X axis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>), indicating a certain influence of biogas slurry on the bacterial community. The PERMANOVA also confirmed that the bacterial community was more altered by biogas slurry &#x00D7; fertilization than by fertilization or application of biogas slurry alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). The similarity in bacterial community structure was highest between BS50 and BS75. However, there were no significant differences in the fungal community structure among any of the treatments except RT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). The PERMANOVA results suggest that biogas slurry &#x00D7; fertilization, biogas slurry and fertilization had statistically equal impacts on the fungal community (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of the soil bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> communities in different treatments.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-655515-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>PERMANOVA of the contributions of the application of fertilizer, biogas slurry and fertilizer &#x00D7; biogas slurry to the variation in bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> community compositions. &#x002A; represents significant differences at <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-655515-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>Network Associations Among Bacterial and Fungal Communities</title>
<p>Network construction was based on the bacterial and fungal OTUs at the genus level with the abundance higher than 0.1% in the experimental soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). The network consisted of 329 significant associations (edges) among 132 nodes, including 278 positive and 51 negative links, and node size was positively proportionate to its abundance. The top 10 taxa with high number of interactions were <italic>Dioszegia</italic> (genus of <italic>Basidiomycetes</italic>, 17 links), <italic>Malassezia</italic> (genus of <italic>Basidiomycetes</italic>, 14 links), <italic>Auricularia</italic> (genus of <italic>Basidiomycetes</italic>, 12 links), <italic>Pseudeurotium</italic> (genus of <italic>Ascomycetes</italic>, 10 links), <italic>Fusarium</italic> (genus of <italic>Ascomycetes</italic>, 9 links), <italic>Ellin6067</italic> (genus of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, 9 links), <italic>Archaeorhizomyces</italic> (genus of <italic>Ascomycetes</italic>, 8 links), <italic>Desulfatiglans</italic> (genus of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, 8 links), <italic>Mortierella</italic> (genus of <italic>Zygomycetes</italic>, 8 links), and <italic>Candida</italic> (genus of <italic>Ascomycetes</italic>, 7 links).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Network analysis based on bacterial and fungal OTUs with the abundance higher than 0.1%. Red and green lines represent significantly positive and negative correlations (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), respectively. Node size is positively related to OTU abundance. Colored proportions of nodes signify OTU abundance in relation to the different treatments.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-12-655515-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Effects on Soil Nutrient Availability and Production of the Paddy Field</title>
<p>In the present study, compared with RT, all the treatments involving biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly increased the SOC and DOC contents and SOC/DOC, indicating that biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer could have a positive impact on SOC sequestration, especially in terms of labile organic carbon (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Similar results were observed in several other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ozores-Hampton et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu M. et al., 2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Xu Z. et al., 2019</xref>). With the increasing ratio between biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer, the SOC and DOC contents first increased and then decreased, implying that a proper replacement dose (50% in the present study) of biogas slurry best benefits soil organic matter content. This result was also consistent with that found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zheng et al. (2017)</xref>, who reported that a pure nitrogen rate of chemical fertilizer to biogas slurry of 0.45:0.55 best improved the soil nitrogen and organic matter content. In the present study, the soil AN and AP under the fertilization treatments had the same pattern as the DOC, but there were no differences in the TN and TP among the fertilization treatments, showing that biogas slurry significantly elevated the soil nutrient availability, especially when biogas slurry was applied with chemical fertilizer. This is in agreement with the results of an experiment involving biogas slurry application in peanut cultivation performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zheng et al. (2015)</xref>, who found that the treatment with 30% pure nitrogen replaced by biogas slurry enhanced the soil-available nutrients and crop yield.</p>
<p>In the present study, compared with that under RT, biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer did not statistically promote paddy yield (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). However, the average of paddy yields under BS25 and BS50 were higher than those under RT during the 3 years, and there was a trend of the growing difference between RT and BS50 being 1.31&#x2013;5.48%. Biogas slurry contains various nutrients, such as organic matter, N, P, K, Mg, and Ca, and can be considered a liquid organic fertilizer. Under the same pure nitrogen conditions, biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer provided both inorganic nutrients and organic nutrients. An appropriate fertilizer doses and a proper ratio of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer could offer nutrients for crop growth in a timely manner and reduce carbon and nitrogen losses caused by leaching and gas emissions, consequently increasing crop yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abubaker et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Win et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cheng et al., 2018</xref>). In the present study, BS50 was found to be better in terms of the soil nutrient availability and the production of paddy fields than the other treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Effects on Microbial &#x03B1; Diversity and Its Relationships With Soil Properties</title>
<p>Our results showed that compared with RT, all the treatments with biogas slurry enhanced the bacterial &#x03B1; diversity and that the values under BS50 and BS75 were the highest, showing a significant positive impact of biogas slurry on the bacterial community, especially when it was combined with chemical fertilizer (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). This was likely due to the extensive organic matter within the biogas slurry and the ability of the biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer to elevate the content of soil available nutrients, which could also promote the growth of the bacterial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Johansen et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zheng et al., 2015</xref>). Correlation analysis showed that the DOC, DOC/SOC, AN, and AP were positively correlated with the bacterial &#x03B1; diversity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>); these variables are all soil availability indices, further confirming the significance of soil available nutrients to bacterial &#x03B1; diversity. Biogas slurry significantly elevated the soil nutrient availability, consequently raised the bacterial &#x03B1; diversity, showing the indirect positive correlation between bacterial community and biogas slurry, especially when biogas slurry applied with chemical fertilizer. This correlation result is also in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu M. et al. (2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Xu Z. et al. (2019)</xref>, who reported that richness and diversity index values were positively correlated with AN, AP, and SOM.</p>
<p>In the present study, compared with that under RT, all the treatments with biogas slurry weakened the fungal &#x03B1; diversity, and the values under BS25 and BS100 were the lowest (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>), indicating an inhibitory effect of biogas slurry on the fungal community. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Geisseler and Scow (2014)</xref> reviewed 64 long-term experiments and claimed that in general, mineral fertilizer is more likely to cause fungal growth than organic fertilizer. A higher concentration of soil available nutrients may be responsible for the negative effects on the fungal community by restraining the colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Wentzel and Joergensen, 2016</xref>). The bacterial community was also apt to thrive under the high available nutrient conditions, which gave them some advantage in the interaction with the fungal community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Walsh et al., 2012</xref>). Although the fungal community was altered by some soil conditions, there was no strong correlation between the fungal &#x03B1;-diversity indices and soil properties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). TN and TP had a higher correlation than the other properties, but it was not significant, implying that the effective factors of the fungal community were more complex and diverse than those of the bacterial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang H. et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Effects on Bacterial Community Composition</title>
<p>With the increasing ratio between biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer, the abundance of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> first increased and then decreased. This was similar to the observations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu M. et al. (2019)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Xu Z. et al. (2019)</xref>. <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> have been demonstrated to have the ability to degrade recalcitrant organic compounds and could be promoted by a high liable organic carbon content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Goldfarb et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hamm et al., 2016</xref>), suggesting that biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer improved the cycling of organic matter. The abundances of <italic>Planctomycetes</italic> and <italic>Rokubacteria</italic> under the treatments with biogas slurry addition were all higher than under RT. Previous studies have shown that <italic>Planctomycetes</italic> play an important role in carbon utilization and have the potential to generate antibiotics to protect their habitat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jeske et al., 2016</xref>). <italic>Rokubacteria</italic> is considered to contribute to carbon metabolism in a wide range of gaseous and solid substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kroeger et al., 2018</xref>). The relative abundances of <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> under biogas slurry addition were higher than those under RT by 16.34&#x2013;22.92%, which was likely caused by <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> preferring high amounts of carbon and diverse carbon sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Xu et al., 2016</xref>). In addition, <italic>Nitrospirae</italic> relative abundance was significantly higher under BS25 than under the other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). <italic>Nitrospirae</italic> has a high nitrogen metabolism efficiency and might also exert a positive effect on carbon fixation and crop yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pachiadaki et al., 2017</xref>). <italic>Chloroflexi</italic> and <italic>Crenarchaeota</italic> were clearly inhibited by biogas slurry application in the present study. <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, widely reported as heterotrophic oligotroph and facultative anaerobic bacteria, are sensitive to soil pH and thrive at neutral pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hug et al., 2013</xref>). Some members of <italic>Crenarchaeota</italic> play a key role in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur biochemical cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang H. et al., 2018</xref>). The abundance of <italic>Crenarchaeota</italic> was observed to decline in a nitrogen-rich environment in a previous study, likely owing to the autotrophic growth ability of the members of this taxon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bates et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>The results of the network association analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>) showed that there were only 2 bacterial taxa in the top 10 taxa with high number of interactions. <italic>Ellin6067</italic> (2 positive and 7 negative links) has been considered as an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium, involved in soil nitrification process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ye et al., 2016</xref>). BS25 had the highest abundance of <italic>Ellin6067</italic> among all the treatments, implying such mixed applications might be beneficial to soil nitrogen cycling. <italic>Desulfatiglans</italic> (7 positive and 1 negative links) play important roles in soil sulfur cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wang et al., 2019</xref>), and was most enriched under BS50, showing the ability of BS50 to promote sulfur nutrient circulation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS4">
<title>Effects on Fungal Community Composition</title>
<p><italic>Ascomycota</italic> was the most abundant and dominant phylum in the fungal community, accounting for 41.19&#x2013;66.83% of all sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>), which was consistent with some previous studies in paddy soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang H. et al., 2018</xref>). This phylum is known as an important decomposer of lignocellulose organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wang et al., 2015</xref>). Compared with that under RT, biogas addition significantly enriched the abundance of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>, showing a positive impact of biogas slurry on soil organic matter decomposition, especially on lignocellulose organic matter. Moreover, the abundance of not all <italic>Ascomycota</italic> species was increased by biogas slurry addition, and the LEfSe analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>) showed that <italic>Stachybotrys</italic> (genus of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>) and <italic>Stachybotryaceae</italic> (family of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>) significantly increased in abundance under RT. <italic>Stachybotrys</italic> generates diverse toxins, such as satratoxins and atranones, which have toxic effects on human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Semeiks et al., 2014</xref>). Some species of <italic>Stachybotryaceae</italic> are saprophytes and weak pathogens of certain plants and can also endanger human health through the air (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liang et al., 2019</xref>). This demonstrates that RT raised the possibility of some potential diseases, while biogas slurry addition can inhibit such diseases to some extent. Two phyla (<italic>Basidiomycota</italic> and <italic>Glomeromycota</italic>) were significantly depleted by biogas slurry application in the present study. <italic>Basidiomycota</italic> are oligotrophs and adapted to relatively poor-nutrient environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et al., 2018</xref>); <italic>Glomeromycota</italic> are capable of assimilating nutrients directly from the environment and are enriched with decreasing carbon and nitrogen levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). The species of <italic>Zoopagomycota</italic> are mainly parasites and pathogens of small animals and some fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Spatafora et al., 2016</xref>). Compared with that under RT, the abundance of <italic>Zoopagomycota</italic> was decreased by all treatments involving biogas slurry addition except BS25, which showed no significant difference with RT. The results indicate that biogas slurry addition might have the ability to control <italic>Zoopagomycota</italic> pathogens, but the effect also depends on the pure nitrogen ratio of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer (higher than 1:3 in the present study).</p>
<p><italic>Dioszegia</italic> are epiphytic phylloplane yeasts and play a key role in plant-microorganism relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Takashima et al., 2019</xref>). According to the network association analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>), <italic>Dioszegia</italic> had 14 positive and 3 negative links, and BS75 promoted <italic>Dioszegia</italic> the most. <italic>Pseudeurotium</italic> (10 positive links) and <italic>Archaeorhizomyces</italic> (8 positive links) were both significantly enriched under BS75. <italic>Pseudeurotium</italic> have been reported to have an impact on crop growth promotion and pathogen inhibition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Zhou et al., 2018</xref>), and members of <italic>Archaeorhizomyces</italic> are considered to have the potential to promote the growth of grasslands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). The genus <italic>Auricularia</italic> (10 positive and 2 negative links) usually grows on wood and plays an important role in human food supply and nutrition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Dai et al., 2019</xref>), which was also significantly promoted by BS75. BS75 demonstrated prominent positive influences of crop growth and pathogen inhibition in the network association analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, on the basis of maintaining a stable paddy yield, 3 years of the application of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly improved soil properties and affected bacterial and fungal community diversity and composition. Compared with those under regular chemical fertilization, biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer significantly increased the bacterial diversity and decreased the fungal diversity. Bacterial community was promoted by DOC, DOC/SOC, AN, and AP, but no soil properties were significantly associated with the fungal community. Biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer had a significant impact on the bacterial community and had roughly equal influences on the fungal community as pure biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer application. The observation of some changes in specific microbial taxa caused by the application of biogas slurry indicates that the addition of biogas slurry exerted both positive and negative impact on plant growth and soil fertility, but a proper ratio of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer may have a positive effect on crop growth and pathogen control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI, <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA623237">PRJNA623237</ext-link> (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA623237">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA623237</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>HanZ contributed to analysis, interpretation of data, and writing original draft of the manuscript. WL contributed to the conception and design of the study. SL and XZ contributed to field investigation and sample acquisition. NB, JZ, and HaiZ contributed to the editing and revising of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="S8">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFD0200804) and the Outstanding Team Program of the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences [nong ke chuang 2017(A-03)].</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>We thank Shanghai Farm for providing the long-term experimental paddy fields and the agricultural managements.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abubaker</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Risberg</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Biogas residues as fertilisers- effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Energy</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>126</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.050</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baral</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Labouriau</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olesen</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide emissions and nitrogen use efficiency of manure and digestates applied to spring barley.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</italic></source> <volume>239</volume> <fpage>188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>908</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>917</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.171</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21085198</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bell</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sparling</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tenuta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Entz</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Soil profile carbon and nutrient stocks under long-term conventional and organic crop and Alfalfa-crop rotations and re-established grassland.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</italic></source> <volume>158</volume> <fpage>156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bian</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil&#x2013;plant system amended with biogas slurry in Taihu basin.</article-title> <source><italic>China Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>16955</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16964</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-016-6712-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27178292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bian</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Health risk assessment of metals in food crops and related soils amended with biogas slurry in Taihu Basin: perspective from field experiment.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>14358</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14366</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-015-4853-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26139394</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>4516</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4522</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1000080107</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20534432</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen leaching losses following biogas slurry irrigation to purple soil of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>29096</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-018-2875-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30112641</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genomic analyses provide insights into the evolutionary history and genetic diversity of <italic>Auricularia</italic> species.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>2255</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.02255</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31632371</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geisseler</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scow</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Long-term effects of mineral fertilizers on soil microorganisms -a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.03.023</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldfarb</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanson</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santee</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>:<issue>94</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2011.00094</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21833332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonthier</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ennis</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farinas</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iverson</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bat&#x00E1;ry</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Biodiversity conservation in agriculture requires a multi-scale approach.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>281</volume>:<issue>20141358</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2014.1358</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25100703</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamm</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tenuta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krause</surname> <given-names>D. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ominski</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tkachuk</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flaten</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacterial communities of an agricultural soil amended with solid pig and dairy manures, and urea fertilizer.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>103</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.02.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hug</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castelle</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wrighton</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharon</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frischkorn</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Community genomic analyses constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate roles in sediment carbon cycling.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>1</volume>:<issue>22</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/2049-2618-1-22</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24450983</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Insam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomez-Brandon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ascher</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Manure-based biogas fermentation residues-friend or foe of soil fertility?</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>84</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeske</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Surup</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ketteni&#x00DF;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rast</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>F&#x00F6;rster</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jogler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Developing techniques for the utilization of planctomycetes as producers of bioactive molecules.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>1242</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.01242</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27594849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johansen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hauggar-Nielsen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ambus</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of digestate from anaerobically digested cattle slurry and plant materials on soil microbial community and emission of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.09.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kroeger</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delmont</surname> <given-names>T. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eren</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>New biological insights into how deforestation in Amazonia affects soil microbial communities using metagenomics and metagenome-assembled genomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>1635</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01635</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30083144</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title><italic>Myrothecium</italic>-like new species from turfgrasses and associated rhizosphere.</article-title> <source><italic>MycoKeys</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/mycokeys.51.31957</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31239822</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crowley</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Functional and structural responses of bacterial and fungal communities from paddy fields following long-term rice cultivation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Soils Sediments</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>1460</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1471</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-015-1343-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Louro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sawamoto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pezzolla</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bol</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00E1;ez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of slurry and ammonium nitrate application on greenhouse gasfluxes of a grassland soil under atypical South West England weather conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</italic></source> <volume>181</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M&#x00F6;ller</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Eng. Life Sci.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>242</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/elsc.201100085</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>National Development and Reform Commission and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China (NDRCMARAPRC)</collab> (<year>2017</year>). <source><italic>National 13th Five-Year Plan for Rural Biogas Development.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbghwb/201702/W020170210515499067992.pdf">http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbghwb/201702/W020170210515499067992.pdf</ext-link> <comment>(Accessed January 25, 2017)</comment></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nkoa</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>492</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ozores-Hampton</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stansly</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salame</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Soil chemical, physical, and biological properties of a sandy soil subjected to long-term organic amendments.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Sustain. Agric.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>259</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10440046.2011.554289</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pachiadaki</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sintes</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergauer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Record</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swan</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>358</volume> <fpage>1046</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1051</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aan8260</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29170234</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schoch</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seifert</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huhndorf</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spouge</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levesque</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>109</volume> <fpage>6241</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6246</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1117018109</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22454494</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Semeiks</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borek</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Otwinowski</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grishin</surname> <given-names>N. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Comparative genome sequencing reveals chemotype-specific gene clusters in the toxigenic black mold <italic>Stachybotrys</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>:<issue>590</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-15-590</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25015739</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spatafora</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benny</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lazarus</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berbee</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data.</article-title> <source><italic>Mycologia</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>1028</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1046</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3852/16-042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Spatial variations of soil respiration and temperature sensitivity along a steep slope of the semiarid Loess Plateau.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>13</volume>:<issue>e0195400</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0195400</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29624600</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takashima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manabe</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohkuma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Draft genome sequences of basidiomycetous epiphytic phylloplane yeast type strains <italic>Dioszegia crocea</italic> JCM 2961 and <italic>Dioszegia aurantiaca</italic> JCM 2956.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiol. Resour. Announc.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e01727-18</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MRA.01727-18</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31248996</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Terhoeven-Urselmans</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheller</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raubuch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ludwig</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joergensen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>CO<sub>2</sub> evolution and N mineralization after biogas slurry application in the field and its yield effects on spring barley.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.05.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards-Jones</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Fungal and bacterial growth following the application of slurry and anaerobic digestate of livestock manure to temperate pasture soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Fertil. Soils</italic></source> <volume>48</volume> <fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>897</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-012-0681-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Planting increases the abundance and structure complexity of soil core functional genes relevant to carbon and nitrogen cycling.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>14345</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep14345</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26396042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reinfelder</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Bacterial, archaeal, and fungal community responses to acid mine drainage-laden pollution in a rice paddy soil ecosystem.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Total Environ.</italic></source> <volume>616-617</volume> <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>116</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.224</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29107775</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Poultry biogas slurry can partially substitute for mineral fertilizers in hydroponic lettuce production.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>659</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>671</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-018-3538-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30414022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impacts of human activities on the composition and abundance of sulfate-reducing and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms in polluted river sediments.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>231</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00231</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30809217</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wentzel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joergensen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of biogas and raw slurries on grass growth and soil microbial indices.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</italic></source> <volume>179</volume> <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.201400544</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wentzel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piepho</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Semmlerbusch</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joergensen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Response of soil fertility indices to long-term application of biogas and raw slurry under organic farming.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Win</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toyota</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Win</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Motobayashi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ookawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirasawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effect of biogas slurry application on CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, Cu and Zn uptakes by whole crop rice in a paddy field in Japan.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>422</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00380768.2014.899886</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of biogas slurry addition on soil properties, yields, and bacterial composition in the rice-rape rotation ecosystem over 3 years.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Soils Sediments</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>2534</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2542</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-019-02258-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effect of biochar additions to soil on nitrogen leaching, microbial biomass and bacterial community structure.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Soil Biol.</italic></source> <volume>74</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.02.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Influence of irrigation with microalgae-treated biogas slurry on agronomic trait, nutritional quality, oxidation resistance, and nitrate and heavy metal residues in Chinese cabbage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Environ. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>244</volume> <fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>461</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.058</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31154108</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joseph</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A combination of biochar&#x2013;mineral complexes and compost improves soil bacterial processes, soil quality, and plant properties.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>372</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00372</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27092104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cobb</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>Trichoderma</italic> biofertilizer links to altered soil chemistry, altered microbial communities, and improved grassland biomass.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>848</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00848</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29760689</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>A. O. W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Replacement of mineral fertilizers with anaerobically digested pig slurry in paddy fields: assessment of plant growth and grain quality.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>8916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8923</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-015-5125-z</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26250820</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>High-throughput sequencing reveals the diversity and community structure of rhizosphere fungi of <italic>Ferula sinkiangensis</italic> at different soil depths.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>6558</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-43110-z</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31024051</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of biogas slurry application on peanut yield, soil nutrients, carbon storage, and microbial activity in an Ultisol soil in southern China.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Soils Sediments</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>460</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-015-1254-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of combined application of biogas slurry and chemical fertilizer on soil aggregation and C/N distribution in an Ultisol.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<issue>e0170491</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0170491</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28125647</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection.</article-title> <source>. <italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>1303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1313</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.11</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21346791</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Application of sodium silicate enhances cucumber resistance to <italic>Fusarium</italic> wilt and alters soil microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>624</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00624</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29868080</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org/">http://www.r-project.org/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>