<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.743695</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effect of Different Regions and Ensiling Periods on Fermentation Quality and the Bacterial Community of Whole-Plant Maize Silage</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Yuan</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1405564/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Longfei</given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Sheng</given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Changrong</given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Chao</given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1411683/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science, Guizhou University</institution>, <addr-line>Guiyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: X. S. Guo, Lanzhou University, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Todd Riley Callaway, University of Georgia, United States; Yanfen Cheng, Nanjing Agricultural University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Jun Hao, <email>jhao@gzu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Microbiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>743695</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>11</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Huang, Liang, Dai, Wu, Chen and Hao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Huang, Liang, Dai, Wu, Chen and Hao</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study aimed to explore the changes in the microbial community on the silage material surface and during the ensiling process of whole-plant maize in different regions. Whole-plant maize silages were sampled in Ziyun, Guanling, and Weinning counties within warm and humid climate areas in southern China. Silages were sampled at 0, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 45 days during ensiling. The nutritional components, fermentation properties, and microbiomes were examined to evaluate the influence of sampling area and fermentation time on the quality of silage. The results showed that the pH values of all silages significantly decreased (&#x003C;4.2 at ensiling day 2) during fermentation and all silages achieved satisfactory fermentation at 45 days. Butyric acid was not detected during ensiling, and the contents of acetic acid and ammonia nitrogen in the final silages were below 6 g/kg DM and 50 g/kg total nitrogen, respectively. <italic>Weissella</italic> was the dominant epiphytic bacteria of raw material in Ziyun and Weinning, while <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was prevalent in Guanling. <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> dominated the ensiling process, and its abundance significantly increased with increasing fermentation time in the three groups. <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was negatively correlated with pH of all silages (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) and positively correlated with lactic acid, propionic acid and acetic acid (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Furthermore, the bacterial community was significantly correlated with environmental factors. Altitude had a highly positive correlation with the abundance of <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic>, <italic>Chryseobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Massilia</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), while precipitation was negatively correlated with these bacteria. The humidity and average temperature significantly influenced the <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic> abundances of fresh whole-plant maize. During the ensiling process, the silages from three regions had similar bacterial dynamic changes, and the <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> formed and maintained good fermentation characteristics in whole-plant maize silage.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>whole-plant maize</kwd>
<kwd>silage</kwd>
<kwd>fermentation quality</kwd>
<kwd>microbial community</kwd>
<kwd>environmental factor</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="66"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="9197"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Ensiling is a common method for preserving fresh forage and contributes to an uninterrupted supply of forage feedstuff to ruminant animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Pahlow et al., 2003</xref>). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are the most important beneficial bacteria in the process of ensiling fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zhu et al., 2010</xref>), which results in organic acids with water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) as fermentation substrate under anaerobic conditions to reduce pH value for achieving the purpose of long-term preservation of silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Keshri et al., 2018</xref>). It is well established that LAB regularly relate to silage fermentation belong to the genera <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, <italic>Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Streptococcus</italic>, and <italic>Weissella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ni et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yang et al., 2019</xref>). The quality of silage mainly depends on the composition and abundance of microbial communities during ensiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Kung et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Zi et al., 2021a</xref>). Whole-plant maize silage has a better absorption rate and higher nutritional value than other silages, and is the most common feed for ruminants worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Khan et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). Various silage microbial compositions have been found in different forages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Guo et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Xu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Yuan et al., 2019</xref>). In addition, for maize ensiling, previous studies have reported that <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was the dominant contributors during ensiling and subsequent exposure to air (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lin et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Zhou et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hu et al., 2018</xref>). Generally, the composition of microorganisms changes greatly before and after ensiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Sepehri and Sarrafzadeh, 2019</xref>). Therefore, it is of great significance to further study the microbial diversity changes in silage for understanding the whole fermentation process and finding the root cause of fermentation quality changes.</p>
<p>As previously mentioned, uncontrollable climatic conditions affect silage fermentation, microorganisms and aerobic stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bernardes et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guan et al., 2018</xref>). Ensiling at high temperatures reduces both the lactic acid (LA) concentration and aerobic stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ashbell et al., 2002</xref>). Moreover, it has been reported that temperature affects the bacterial diversity and fermentation quality of silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Li et al., 2021</xref>). Epiphytic bacterial communities in fresh forage depends mainly on geographical location, climate, and cutting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Guo et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yang et al., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cai et al. (1999)</xref> studied the microorganisms attached to the surface of corn, sorghum, alfalfa and Italian ryegrass collected from the same place and found that there were very few <italic>Pediococcus</italic> attached to the surface of sorghum and ryegrass and few <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> attached to the surface of alfalfa. The community of epiphytic bacteria in corn material has been shown to be affected by rainfall and humidity, and the microbial community during ensiling has been shown to be affected by temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guan et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The composition of the epiphytic community is an important factor of silage quality and changes in the microbial community during fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gharechahi et al., 2017</xref>). Nevertheless, the effect of the environment on the epiphytic community of whole-plant maize silage has rarely been reported. We hypothesized that the succession characteristics of whole-plant maize silage are different in different areas. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the correlation between bacterial communities and sampling area environmental factors (altitude, precipitation, temperature, and humidity) and then to examine the dynamic changes in microbial community diversity and fermentation quality during the ensiling of whole-plant maize.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="S2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Study Sites and Sample Collection</title>
<p>Whole-plant maize was planted in Ziyun County (Z) (106&#x00B0;10&#x2032;E, 25&#x00B0;37&#x2032;N, altitude 840 m), Guanling County (G) (105&#x00B0;24&#x2032;E, 25&#x00B0;57&#x2032;N, altitude 1350 m), and Weining County (W) (104&#x00B0;16&#x2032;E, 26&#x00B0;55&#x2032;N, altitude 2230 m). The monthly changes of temperature, precipitation and humidity in the three regions in 2019 are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The variety of maize was Qingfeng No. 4. The samples were planted on February 25, 2019; March 28, 2019; and April 2, 2019 in Ziyun, Guanling, and Weining, respectively. Samples were collected at the dough stage according to local tradition on July 31, 2019; September 12, 2019; and September 18, 2019. Instantly, the materials were collected and transported in ice boxes and stored at &#x2013;80&#x00B0;C before use. Another part of the collected materials was chopped to approximately 2 cm by a hand paper cutter. After mixing thoroughly, the material was vacuum-packed into plastic bags. Each bag contained approximately 500 g of fresh matter. A total of 54 bags (three treatments &#x00D7; six ensiling durations &#x00D7; three replicates) were prepared and stored at normal temperature (25&#x2013;30&#x00B0;C), and the fermentation time of all samples was approximately 45 days. Samples were used to determine the chemical composition, fermentation quality and microbial community on days 0, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 45.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>The monthly changes of temperature and precipitation in the area of Ziyun <bold>(A),</bold> Guanling <bold>(B),</bold> and Weining <bold>(C)</bold> in 2019, and monthly humidity changes in three regions <bold>(D)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-743695-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Chemical and Fermentation Profile Analyses</title>
<p>Specimens were determined by drying the samples in a forced air oven at 65&#x00B0;C for 72 h and passed through a 1.0 mm sieve before the chemical assay. The contents of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) were measured according to previously published study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 2000</xref>). The WSC content was determined by colorimetric after-reaction with anthrone reagent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Turula et al., 2010</xref>). The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were analyzed using a previously established method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Van Soest et al., 1991</xref>). To measure fermentation quality, 20 g samples were suspended in 180 mL of distilled water overnight at 4&#x00B0;C and filtered through four layers of cheesecloth. Then, the filtrates were used to determine the pH value and ammonia-N (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) and organic acid contents. The pH, lactic acid (LA), acetic acid (AA), propionic acid (PA), butyric acid (BA), ammonia-N (AN), and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were measured as previously established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li M. et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Bacterial Community Analysis</title>
<p>The DNA extraction was operated using the HiPure Soil DNA extraction kit (Magen, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The 16S rDNA V5-V7 region of the ribosomal RNA gene were amplified by PCR (94&#x00B0;C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles at 98&#x00B0;C for 10 s, 62&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and 68&#x00B0;C for 30 s and a final extension at 68&#x00B0;C for 5 min) with primers 799F (AACMGGATTAGATACCCKG) and 1193R (ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Logue et al., 2016</xref>). Amplicons were extracted from 2% agarose gels and purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions and quantified using ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Foster City, United States). Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar and paired-end sequenced (2 &#x00D7; 250) on an Illumina platform according to the standard protocols.</p>
<p>Tag assembly was carried out using filtered reads according to the following principles: the overlap between paired-end reads should be more than 10-bp and have less than a 2% mismatch. The unique tags were obtained by removal of redundant tags using MOTHUR software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Schloss et al., 2009</xref>). The effective tags were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of &#x2265;97% similarity using UPARSE (version 9.2.64) pipeline. Diversity metrics were determined using the core-diversity plug-in within QIIME (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Callahan et al., 2016</xref>). The microbial diversity within an individual sample was assessed using the following alpha diversity indices: the Chao1 richness estimator and Shannon diversity index. Beta diversity was analyzed to assess the structural variation of microbiota across specimens, and then principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">V&#x00E1;zquez-Baeza et al., 2013</xref>). The relative abundances of different bacterial communities at the phylum and genus levels were also analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficient between environmental factors and species was calculated in R project psych package (version 1.8.4). The heat map function of the R software and genus information for the Whole-plant silages were used to generate a heat map. Environmental factors during corn growth and fermentation quality after silage were selected for Spearman correlation analysis with bacterial community. The data were analyzed using the free online platform of Omicshare tools.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Statistical Analyses</title>
<p>The statistical analyses of two-way ANOVA were performed using SPSS 20.0. Duncan&#x2019;s HSD test was employed to determine the differences in the treatment means, where significant differences were declared at <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, and the data are expressed as the mean and the standard error of the mean (SEM).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Chemical Analysis of Whole-Plant Maize Ensiling</title>
<p>The changes in nutritional components during different regions of ensiling are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The DM contents of all maize raw materials ranged from 268.6 to 303.3 g/kg, while the highest DM content was 303.3 g/kg in the W group (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), and the lowest DM content was 268.6 g/kg in the G group (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The content of DM in each group decreased with increasing fermentation time and was in the order of W &#x003E; Z &#x003E; G samples at any stage of fermentation. The content of CP in the Z and G groups was lower than that in the W group on days 5 and 10 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), while that in the Z group was lower than that in the G and W groups on day 45 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The WSC content of each group decreased significantly throughout the fermentation process. The contents of NDF and ADF in the Z group were significantly higher than those in the other groups at any stage of fermentation, and they showed a similar decreasing trend with the extension of fermentation time. Moreover, the contents of NDF and ADF in the G group were lower than those in the other groups on day 45 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The ensiling time (D) and treatment (T) significantly affected the chemical composition (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). The results also showed a significant interaction between D and T for the contents of DM, WSC, NDF, and ADF (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Chemical composition of whole-plant maize silage in different regions.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Item</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Treatment</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="6"><bold>Ensiling days</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>SEM</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>2</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>5</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>10</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>20</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>45</bold></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>D</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>T</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>D &#x00D7; T</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dry matter (g/kg FW)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">274.1Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">268.6Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">262.0Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">254.9Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">254.4Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250.9Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">268.6Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">261.7Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">254.5Cc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252.6Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250.7Ce</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248.6Cf</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">303.3Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">293.6Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">292.1Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">274.8Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">264.7Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">260.6Af</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water-soluble carbohydrate (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.9Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.0Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.0Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.6Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.9Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.2Af</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.9Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.4Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.7Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.1Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.3Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.6Bf</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.0Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.4Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.7Cc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.4Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.5Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.3Bf</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Crude protein (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.3Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.3Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.0Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.1Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.9Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.5Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.5Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.8Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.5Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.6Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.1Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.7Ac</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.4Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.7Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.0Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.1Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.0Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.2Bd</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Starch (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">267.9Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">262.0Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">259.4Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">258.7Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255.6Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">240.8Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275.0Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252.0Bbc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252.9Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250.6Ccd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248.7Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">244.1Be</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">296.2Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">260.8Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">272.4Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275.3Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">276.1Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275.1Ab</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Neutral detergent fiber (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">527.1Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">525.7Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">522.4Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">515.8Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">511.0Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">475.0Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">504.1Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">496.5Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">495.0Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">488.5Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">476.0Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">456.2Be</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">477.3Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">461.5Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">457.8Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">444.0Cc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">439.7Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">437.1Cd</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acid detergent fiber (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">257.9Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255.4Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252.9Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250.2Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248.6Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">246.9Af</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t1fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250.7Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">244.3Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">236.4Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">226.6Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">222.4Ce</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">207.3Cf</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">244.3Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">237.4Cb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">232.4Cc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">229.5Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">227.4Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225.4Bf</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t1fn1"><p><italic>Z, Ziyun; G, Guanling; W, Weining; FM, fresh matter; DM, dry matter; ND, not detected; &#x201C;&#x2013;&#x201D;, default. D, ensiling days; T, treatment; D &#x00D7; T, interaction of ensiling days and treatment; SEM, standard error of means; Means with different letters in the same row (a&#x2013;f) or column (A&#x2013;C) differ (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>The Fermentation Property of Whole-Plant Maize During Ensiling</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> illustrates the fermentation quality of whole-plant maize silage in different regions. The pH value of each group decreased significantly on the second day of fermentation (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), all of which were below 4.2. Moreover, the highest and lowest pH appeared in the G group and the W group on day 45 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), respectively. The LA content of each group increased significantly during fermentation, and the highest LA content was found in the W group on day 45 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The contents of AA and PA in each group gradually increased with prolonged ensiling, and the contents in the Z group were lower than those in the other groups on day 45 (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The contents of BA were not detected in all silages. The contents of AN/TN in all groups were dramatically increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) during fermentation, within lower than 5%. Moreover, pH, AA, LA, PA, and AN/TN were interactively influenced by treatment and ensiling days (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Fermentation quality of whole-plant maize silage in different regions.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Item</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Treatment</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="6"><bold>Ensiling days</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>SEM</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3"><bold><italic>P</italic>-value</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>2</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>5</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>10</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>20</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>45</bold></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>D</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>T</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>D &#x00D7; T</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.60Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.76Cc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.72Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.67Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.62Ce</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.80Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.59Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.03Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.87Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.83Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.78Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.88Ac</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.56Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.91Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.73Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.67Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.66Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.52Ce</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lactic acid (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.5Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.3Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.4Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.0Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.2Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.179</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.5Ce</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.0Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.7Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.2Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.5Cd</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.9Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.2Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.3Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.8Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.1Aa</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Acetic acid (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.4Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.5Ca</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.5Aa</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.9Ba</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Propionic acid (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8Cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7Aa</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.2Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5Aa</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Butyric acid (g/kg DM)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ammonia-N (g/kg total N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.9Be</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.5Bd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.0Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.7Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.0Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.4Ba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.393</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.5Bf</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.5Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.1Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.9Ac</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.8Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.7Aa</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.1Ae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.0Ad</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.9Bcd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.8Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.5Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.9Ca</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t2fn1"><p><italic>Z, Ziyun; G, Guanling; W, Weining; FM, fresh matter; DM, dry matter; ND, not detected; &#x201C;&#x2013;&#x201D;, default. D, ensiling days; T, treatment; D &#x00D7; T, interaction of ensiling days and treatment; SEM, standard error of means; Means with different letters in the same row (a&#x2013;f) or column (A&#x2013;C) differ (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Microbial Diversity of Whole-Plant Maize During Ensiling</title>
<p>The bacterial alpha diversities of the silages were evaluated by the Chao1 and Shannon indexes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2A,B</xref>). The bacterial diversity increased with the extension of fermentation time in the Z group. However, the bacterial diversity of silages in the G group and the W group was richer after 2 days of fermentation.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Community diversity and richness of the silages for every period in the area of Ziyun, Guanling, and Weining: <bold>(A)</bold> Chaol index of silage samples for every period (0, 2, 5, l0, 20, and 45 days); <bold>(B)</bold> Shannon index of silage samples for every period (0, 2, 5, l0, 20, and 45 days). Solid discrete points means outlier.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-743695-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The relative abundances of bacterial communities at the phylum and genus levels were presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>. As seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the top two phyla during the process of ensiling in the three regions. <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Weissella</italic>, and <italic>Acetobacter</italic> were the most dominant genera in all maize silages. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref> shows the abundance of Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum in the G group, exceeding 95% in raw materials. The dominant bacteria on the surface of maize in the Z and W groups were Firmicutes, with relative abundances of 90.55 and 71.70%, respectively, and Proteobacteria had relative abundances of 9.22 and 27.04%, respectively. At the genus level, <italic>Weissella</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> were found in large amounts in the Z and W groups, while no obvious dominant bacteria were found in the G group of raw materials.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Circos map of bacterial communities at the phylum <bold>(A)</bold> and genus levels <bold>(B)</bold> for whole-plant maize silage.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-743695-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>The relative abundance of bacteria community proportions at the phylum <bold>(A)</bold> and genus <bold>(B)</bold> level across the treatments (as a percentage of the total sequence).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-743695-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>All the groups were dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria during ensiling at the phylum level. The Proteobacteria abundance decreased while that of Firmicutes increased rapidly and became the dominant phylum with increasing fermentation time. At the genus level, the most dominant bacterial genera were <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic> in the samples during the ensiling process. After ensiling, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was the dominant microbial genus, and its relative abundance exceeded 70%. The <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> abundance significantly increased with the extension of fermentation time, while those of <italic>Weissella</italic> and <italic>Acinetobacter</italic> significantly decreased or disappeared in the subsequent period. The relative abundance of <italic>Acetobacter</italic> in each group decreased with the process of ensiling. By 45 days, the relative abundance of <italic>Acetobacter</italic> in each group decreased to below 1%. In addition, <italic>Pantoea</italic> and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> existed in the whole corn silage period of all three regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Correlation Analysis Between Bacterial Communities and Environmental Factors</title>
<p>The association analysis between bacterial abundance and environmental factors is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>. Negative correlations were observed between the average temperature and the relative abundance of the <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (&#x2013;0.73), <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> (&#x2013;0.67), <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic> (&#x2013;0.74), <italic>Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium</italic> (&#x2013;0.92), <italic>Chryseobacterium</italic> (&#x2013;0.75), and <italic>Massilia</italic> (&#x2013;0.71). Altitude was associated with increased abundance of <italic>Rahnella, Stenotrophomonas</italic>, <italic>Chryseobacterium</italic>, <italic>Massilia</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), <italic>Serratia</italic>, and <italic>Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). The level of precipitation was associated with decreased abundance of <italic>Rahnella</italic>, <italic>Serratia</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic>, <italic>Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium</italic>, <italic>Chryseobacterium</italic> and <italic>Massilia</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Humidity was associated with increased abundance of <italic>Weissella</italic>, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic>, <italic>Chryseobacterium</italic>, <italic>Massilia</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), and <italic>Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Pararhizobium-Rhizobium</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001), while it was associated with decreased abundance of <italic>Escherichia&#x2013;Shigella</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Correlation analysis of the bacterial community with environmental factors. Positive correlations are shown in red, and negative correlations are shown in blue. &#x2018;<sup>&#x2217;</sup>, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup>, and <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup>&#x2019; represents <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, and <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-743695-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Correlation Analysis of Bacterial Community With Fermentation Products</title>
<p>The association analysis between bacterial abundance and fermentation indexes is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>. Specifically, the pH value was associated with decreased abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). The LA concentration was associated with increased abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), while it was negatively correlated with that of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Massilia</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). The contents of AA and PA were associated with increased abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001), while AA concentration was negatively correlated with the abundance of <italic>Acetobacter</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and <italic>Pantonea</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), PA concentration was associated with decreased abundance of <italic>Acetobacter</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and <italic>Weissella</italic>, <italic>Gluconobacter</italic>, and <italic>Oceanobacillus</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Finally, the positive correlations have been observed between AN/TN concentrations and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and <italic>Herbaspirillum</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), while AN/TN concentrations was associated with decreased abundance of <italic>Acetobacter</italic>, <italic>Rahnella</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic>, and <italic>Pantoea</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Relationships of fermentation characteristics with silage bacterial community at the genus level. Positive correlations are shown in red, and negative correlations are shown in blue. &#x2018;<sup>&#x2217;</sup>, <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup>, and <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup>&#x2019; represent <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, and <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-12-743695-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Nutritional Characteristics of Whole-Plant Maize During Ensiling</title>
<p>The expected DM content for good silage is 30&#x223C;35% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Guyader et al., 2018</xref>). The DM content in each group decreased with the extension of fermentation time, which was mainly due to the WSC being consumed by LAB and other microorganisms for fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hu et al., 2009</xref>). The different CP contents of raw materials may be related to cultivation and fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Miao et al., 2006</xref>). CP is one of the main nutritional components of silage, and the degradation of protein will affect the nutritional value of pastures. The lost nitrogen can only meet the nutritional needs of livestock by supplementing protein feed in the diet, thus increasing the breeding cost (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bilal, 2009</xref>). In this study, the CP content of the Z and G groups increased on the 10th and 20th days, respectively, while that of the W group increased on the 5th and 10th days of fermentation, which may be due to the decrease in DM content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Zhang et al., 2018</xref>). In addition, when the pH was low, some bacteria composed of protein could not grow and reproduce in the fermentation process and became a part of the feed, which also increased the content of CP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bilal, 2009</xref>). On the other hand, the loss in CP was relatively small due to good fermentation.</p>
<p>The WSC content decreased significantly throughout the fermentation process, and the loss rate of each group reached 70%. As the substrate of silage fermentation, the WSC content will be decomposed by LAB to produce LA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Moselhy et al., 2015</xref>). The content of ADF and NDF affects the chewing time of ruminants and indirectly affects feed digestibility in domestic animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Jang et al., 2017</xref>). In the present study, the contents of NDF and ADF in each group decreased with increasing fermentation time, which indicated that silage fermentation had a certain degradation effect on the fiber components of whole-plant maize, thus improving the digestibility of silage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>The Fermentation Property of Whole-Plant Maize During Ensiling</title>
<p>The pH value of silage is an important index to evaluate the success of silage, and well-fermented silage should have a pH of 3.8&#x223C;4.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Kung et al., 2018</xref>). The low pH value ensures that harmful bacteria are inhibited and finally contributes to the good fermentation of whole-plant maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Keshri et al., 2018</xref>). The pH was less than 4.0 and reached the lowest point at 20 days in all the silages except for that in the W group, which agreed with the results of a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sun et al., 2021</xref>). According to the fermentation mode, LA fermentation can be divided into homofermentative and heterofermentative types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Guo et al., 2018</xref>). Homofermentation mainly produces LA, whereas heterofermentation also produces AA, ethanol and CO<sub>2</sub> in addition to LA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Pahlow et al., 2003</xref>). In this study, LAB grew rapidly and produced enough LA in each group, which inhibited the growth and reproduction of harmful microorganisms. With increasing LA content, homofermentative LAB are inhibited, while heterofermentative LAB begin to dominate due to the stronger tolerance to AA and pH value, and fermentation gradually changes from homofermentative LAB fermentation to heterofermentative LAB fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shao et al., 2002</xref>). The AA content of each group gradually increased with increasing fermentation time. In addition, when the silage is fermented to a certain extent and the pH is low, the fermentation of LAB will also be inhibited. At the same time, some anaerobic microorganisms that may exist in silage begin to decompose LA and produce other organic acids, such as AA and PA, which leads to a decrease in LA content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shao et al., 2002</xref>). In this study, with the extension of fermentation time, the LA content decreased and the AA and PA contents increased gradually in the G group, which indicated that the type of fermentation was heterofermentative. The contents of LA and AA were relatively high, and the ammonia nitrogen content was within a limited range. These indexes showed the excellent fermentation quality of all the silages. BA is a product produced by decomposing protein, glucose and LA by spoilage bacteria and BA bacteria, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Addah et al., 2012</xref>). It has been reported that BA content &#x003E; 5 g/kg DM affects the palatability of feed and reduces the feed intake by livestock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Muck, 2010</xref>). During the whole fermentation process, BA was not detected in any group.</p>
<p>During the ensiling process, the ammonia nitrogen is mainly produced by the degradation of protein by plant enzymes and the utilization of protein and amino acids by microbial decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Kung et al., 2018</xref>). In general, the ammonia-N content is recommended to be less than 5% for maize silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>). The high ammonia-N content indicates that proteolysis occurred to a deep extent during ensiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mu et al., 2021</xref>). In the present study, the content of AN/TN in each group was lower than 5%, indicating that harmful bacteria were effectively inhibited.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Microbial Diversity of Whole-Plant Maize During Ensiling</title>
<p>The microbe numbers and species composition are varied with different silage materials or ensiling processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Khota et al., 2016</xref>). Various epiphytic bacterial communities in raw materials might originate from unique growth environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">McGarvey et al., 2013</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gharechahi et al. (2017)</xref> reported a special bacterial community in whole-plant corn from different geographical locations. In this study, the differences at the species level in the epiphytic microorganisms of the Whole-plant fresh samples from the three areas were observed. The sampling locations in three areas belong to a subtropical monsoon climate and are close to each other. The phylum-level bacteria mainly attached to the surface of silage maize in the three regions were Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Additionally, the main LAB genus in fresh forages was <italic>Weissella</italic>. This indicated that <italic>Weissella</italic> might play a major role in the early stage of fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sun et al., 2021</xref>). This genus is a selective anaerobic bacterium, which converts water-soluble sugars into LA and AA in the early stage of silage fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cai et al., 1998</xref>). In the current study, <italic>Weissella</italic> with low abundance was detected in silages during the ensiling process (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>), which might lead to relatively high AA content in all silages (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<p>The nature of silage is due to complex microbial succession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yang et al., 2019</xref>), in which bacteria play a key role (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li P. et al., 2019</xref>). In this study, the abundance of Firmicutes increased rapidly and became the dominant phylum during ensiling. This observation might be explained by the fact that the growth of Firmicutes is related to the low pH and anaerobic conditions formed during ensiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). Although <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was usually not the dominant bacteria in fresh corn of the Z group, it began to dominate at 2 days of ensiling. This observation suggested that the LAB count in the raw materials is enough to ensure the fermentation quality of the final silage. <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Lactococcus, Weissella</italic>, and <italic>Enterococcus</italic> are common LA-producing bacteria in silage, and their abundance changes are closely related to the quality of silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ni et al., 2018</xref>). Generally, LA-producing cocci are the dominant LAB. These initiate LA fermentation during the early stages of ensiling, whereby <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> will grow rapidly into the dominant bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et al., 2019</xref>). This result suggested that <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was an important genus for silage fermentation during ensiling. Many studies have shown the dominance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> in ensiled corn silages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Li and Nishino, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ogunade et al., 2017</xref>) due to its desirable functions during ensiling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et al., 2019</xref>). The study showed that <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic> were the only LAB with high abundance in the whole-plant maize silage process in different regions, which was consistent with the research of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ogunade et al. (2017)</xref>, and the reason for the difference with the research of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Tohno et al. (2013)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ni et al. (2017b)</xref> may be related to the research materials and locations.</p>
<p><italic>Gluconobacter</italic> and <italic>Acetobacter</italic> were found in minor abundance during the early stages of ensilage. <italic>Acetobacter</italic> is a kind of AA-producing and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kumiko et al., 2001</xref>) and may lead to the decline in pH at the early stage of the ensiling process. Other bacteria, such as <italic>Pantoea</italic>, <italic>Rahnella</italic>, and <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, were evenly distributed during the ensiling process in lower amounts are consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gharechahi et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Ni et al., 2017a</xref>), and some of them are undesirable in silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Muck (2010)</xref> reported that <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Paenibacillus</italic>, <italic>Enterobacter</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus</italic>, and <italic>Clostridium</italic> are the main microorganisms that decompose proteins into ammonia nitrogen and cause protein loss. None of these bacteria were found in the top 10 bacteria regarding relative abundance, which was consistent with the previous results of low AN/TN contents in the present study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS4">
<title>Correlation Analysis Between Bacterial Communities and Environmental Factors</title>
<p>There are many factors (moisture, WSC, regional factors) that affect the microbiome and influence the fermentation quality of silage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">McEniry et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bernardes et al., 2018</xref>). Usually, regional factors include temperature, humidity, precipitation, longitude, latitude, and altitude. Previous reports showed that high temperatures and rainfall had detrimental effects on the fermentation process and silage quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kim and Adesogan, 2006</xref>). In addition, high temperature affected the transformation of microorganisms in corn silage from a homofermentative to a heterofermentative LAB community, which had been previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Guan et al., 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guan et al. (2018)</xref> reported that <italic>Weissella</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> were the main epiphytic bacteria of corn silage in high-temperature and high-humidity areas. Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zi et al. (2021b)</xref> reported that temperature, humidity, and precipitation affected the fermentation quality of silage through the changes in microbiomes. Epiphytic bacterial communities are highly related to climate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bernardes et al., 2018</xref>). In this study, altitude was positively correlated with the abundance of <italic>Stenotrophomonas</italic>, <italic>Chryseobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Massilia</italic>, while precipitation <italic>w</italic>as negatively correlated with these bacteria. This indicates that precipitation was the factor affecting the epiphytic bacteria of the silage material. The <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> abundance in fresh maize did not change regularly with increasing altitude, and the reason for the difference may be related to the temperature and precipitation in the three regions. The correlation analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>) showed that the relative abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was negatively correlated with temperature. This also explains why the temperature of the G group was the highest (21.35&#x00B0;C), while the relative abundance of attached <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was the lowest (2.75%). The temperature of the W group was the lowest (17.32&#x00B0;C), while the relative abundance of attached <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was the highest (63.77%). Altitude and precipitation influence some microorganisms in silage, but they do not relate to the main bacteria in silage, such as <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic>. This shows that when silage enters a completely anaerobic environment, the influence of climate factors on the main microorganisms will become smaller. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cai et al. (1999)</xref> reported that a certain amount of LAB in forage will have a great impact on silage fermentation. In this study, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic> were correlated with temperature and humidity, and the most dominant bacterial genera were <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic> in the samples during the ensiling process. This result indicated that the main factors affecting the microbial diversity of silages were humidity and average temperature. Environmental factors affect the community of epiphytic bacteria on raw materials, which have a greater impact on the initial stage of silage fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zi et al., 2021b</xref>). We speculate that the influence of environmental factors on the microbial community will decrease during the silage fermentation process, thus reducing its influence on silage quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS5">
<title>Correlation Analysis of Bacterial Community With Fermentation Products</title>
<p>Microorganisms affect silage quality through a series of metabolites. For example, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> species mainly affect LA production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guan et al., 2018</xref>). In the present study, The <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> was positively correlated with the LA content, which dominated the bacterial community in the fermentation process and had a negative correlation with pH in all silages. This result was consistent with the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sun et al. (2021)</xref>. <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> is an undesirable bacterium that can survive in an anaerobic environment, and its production of biogenic amines leads to the decrease in protein content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Roberson and Firestone, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duni&#x00E8;re et al., 2013</xref>). The AN/TN content was negatively correlated with the abundance of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, indicating that the existence of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> may contribute to the preservation of protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Ogunade et al., 2018</xref>). Other studies have confirmed these findings, indicating that the fermentation characteristics are highly correlated with the microflora of silage and affect the overall fermentation quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Ren et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yang et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="S5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>All of the whole-plant maize silages had satisfactory fermentation quality. The bacterial community of fresh raw material was mainly composed of <italic>Weissella</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>. Although the bacterial community varied during ensiling, <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> dominated the ensiling process. <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> had a negative correlation with pH in all silages and grew well under low pH conditions, produced LA during ensiling, and effectively influenced fermentation quality. Altitude and precipitation influenced some specific microorganisms in silage, but they did not affect the main bacteria in silages. The humidity and average temperature significantly influenced the abundances of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> and <italic>Weissella</italic> of fresh whole-plant maize and had a greater impact on the whole fermentation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="S6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p></sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>JH and CC contributed to conception and design of the study. LL, SD, and CW performed the statistical analysis. YH wrote the manuscript and interpretation of data. All the authors read and contributed to the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="pudiscl1">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="S8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Science and Technology Support project of Guizhou Province [(2021)-043] and the Talent Base of Grassland Ecological Animal Husbandry talent in Guizhou Province (RCJD2018-13).</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Addah</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baah</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okine</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A third-generation esterase inoculant alters fermentation pattern and improves aerobic stability of barley silage and the efficiency of body weight gain of growing feedlot cattle.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>90</volume> <fpage>1541</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/jas.2011-4085</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22147468</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="other"><collab>AOAC</collab> (<year>2000</year>). <source><italic>Official Methods of Analysis</italic></source>, <edition>17th Edn</edition>. <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashbell</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weinberg</surname> <given-names>Z. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Filya</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The effects of temperature on the aerobic stability of wheat and corn silages.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Ind. Microb. Biotechnol</italic>.</source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/SJ/JIM/7000237</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11986929</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bernardes</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>J. L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adesogan</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drouin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nussio</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Silage review: unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>101</volume> <fpage>4001</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4019</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2017-13703</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29685274</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bilal</surname> <given-names>M. Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effect of molasses and com silage addves on the characteristics of mott dwarf elephant grass silage at different fermentation periods.</article-title> <source><italic>Pakistan Vet. J.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>395</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>396</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benno</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakase</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Characterization and identification of <italic>Pediococcus</italic> species isolated from forage crops and their application for silage preparation.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>2901</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2906</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.65.7.2901-2906.1999</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10388681</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benno</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohmomo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakase</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Influence of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic> spp. from an inoculant and of weissella and <italic>Leuconostoc</italic> spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>2982</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2987</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.64.8.2982-2987.1998</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9687461</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from illumine amplicon data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Methods</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3869</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27214047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duni&#x00E8;re</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sindou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chaucheyras-Durand</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chevallier</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Th&#x00E9;venot Sergentet</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol</italic>.</source> <volume>182</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gharechahi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kharazian</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarikhan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jouzani</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aghdasi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salekdeh</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Microb. Biotechnol</italic>.</source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>1663</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1676</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.12751</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28696065</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ran</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microbial community and fermentation dynamics of corn silage prepared with heat-resistant lactic acid bacteria in a hot environment.</article-title> <source><italic>Microorganisms</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>719</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8050719</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32408707</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>265</volume> <fpage>282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>290</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Profiling of metabolome and bacterial community dynamics in ensiled <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> inoculated without or with <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> or <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep</italic>.</source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>366</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-18348-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29321642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guyader</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baron</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beauchemin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Corn forage yield and quality for silage in short growing season areas of the Canadian prairies.</article-title> <source><italic>Agronomy</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy8090164</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcdonell</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klingerman</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kung</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The effect of <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic> 40788 or <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> MTD-1 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages ensiled at two dry matter contents.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>92</volume> <fpage>3907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3914</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2008-1788</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19620673</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Diversity of bacterial community during ensiling and subsequent exposure to air in whole-plant maize silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>1464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1473</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.17.0860</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29747496</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y. J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber content on dry matter intake, digestibility, and chewing activity in Korean native goats (<italic>Capra hircus</italic> coreanae) fed with total mixed ration.</article-title> <source><italic>Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>1405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1409</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.16.0868</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28423870</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keshri</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pinto</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kroupitski</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weinberg</surname> <given-names>Z. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sela</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> inoculant.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biot</italic>.</source> <volume>102</volume> <fpage>4025</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4037</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cone</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendriks</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Sci. Food Agr</italic>.</source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>238</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.6703</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24752455</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khota</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pholsen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Higgs</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Natural lactic acid bacteria population of tropical grasses and their fermentation factor analysis of silage prepared with cellulase and inoculant.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>9768</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9781</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2016-11180</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27743669</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adesogan</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Influence of ensiling temperature, simulated rainfall, and delayed sealing on fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of corn silage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>89</volume> <fpage>3122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72586-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumiko</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taniguchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ujike</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishihara</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mori</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ono</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Characterization of <italic>acetic acid bacteria</italic> in traditional acetic acid fermentation of rice vinegar (komesu) and unpolished rice vinegar (kurosu) produced in Japan.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>986</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>990</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.67.2.986-990.2001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11157275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kung</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name> <name><surname>Shaver</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Silage review: interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>101</volume> <fpage>4020</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4033</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2017-13909</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29685275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A reused method for molasses-processed wastewater: effect on silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of <italic>Pennisetum purpereum</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>241</volume> <fpage>1003</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1011</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.117</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28637158</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Silage fermentation, chemical composition and ruminal degradation of king grass, cassava foliage and their mixture.</article-title> <source><italic>Grassland Sci.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/grs.12235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Silage fermentation and bacterial community of bur clover, annual ryegrass and their mixtures prepared with microbial inoculant and chemical additive.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>247</volume> <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.11.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impacts of low temperature and ensiling period on the bacterial community of oat silage by SMRT.</article-title> <source><italic>Microorganisms</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>274</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/MICROORGANISMS9020274</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33525587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nishino</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Monitoring the bacterial community of maize silage stored in a bunker silo inoculated with <italic>Enterococcus faecium</italic>. <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>110</volume> <fpage>1561</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1570</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05010.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21447012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bolsen</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brent</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>Y. C. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Epiphytic lactic acid bacteria succession during the pre-ensiling and ensiling periods of alfalfa and maize.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbio</italic>.</source> <volume>73</volume> <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>387</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of a microbial community during ensiling and upon aerobic exposure inlactic acid bacteria inoculation-treated and untreated barley silages.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>273</volume> <fpage>212</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.041</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30447622</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Logue</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stedmon</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kellerman</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersson</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Experimental insights into the importance of aquatic bacterial community composition to the degradation of dissolved organic matter.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>533</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>545</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2015.131</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26296065</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henderson</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heron</surname> <given-names>S. J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <source><italic>The Biochemistry of Silage. Version</italic></source>, <edition>2th Edn</edition>. <publisher-loc>Marlow</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chalcombe Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McEniry</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Kiely</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clipson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forristal</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doyle</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Assessing the impact of various ensilage factors on the fermentation of grass silage using conventional culture and bacterial community analysis techniques.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>1584</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1593</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04557.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19863691</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McGarvey</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franco</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palumbo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hnasko</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanker</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitloehner</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Bacterial population dynamics during the ensiling of <italic>Medicago sativa</italic> (alfalfa) and subsequent exposure to air.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>114</volume> <fpage>1661</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1670</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.12179</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23521112</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulla</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hernandez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Within-field variation in corn yield and grain quality responses to nitrogen fertilization and hybrid selection.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. J.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2005.0120</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moselhy</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borba</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borba</surname> <given-names>A. E. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Improving the nutritive value, in vitro digestibility and aerobic stability of <italic>Hedychium gardnerianum</italic> silage through application of additives at ensiling time.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>206</volume> <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.05.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title><italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> and molasses alter dynamic chemical composition, microbial community, and aerobic stability of mixed (amaranth and rice straw) silage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Sci. Food. Agr</italic>.</source> <volume>101</volume> <fpage>5225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5235</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/JSFA.11171</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33611793</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muck</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Silage microbiology and its control through additives.</article-title> <source><italic>Rev. Bras. Zootec.</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1516-35982010001300021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017b</year>). <article-title>Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>238</volume> <fpage>706</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>715</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.055</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28501002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Minh</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Comparative microbiota assessment of wilted Italian ryegrass, whole crop corn, and wilted alfalfa silage using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and next-generation sequencing.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>101</volume> <fpage>1385</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1394</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-016-7900-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27722778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>265</volume> <fpage>563</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>567</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2018.05.097</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29861298</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogunade</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cervantes</surname> <given-names>A. A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arriola</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vyas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Fate of <italic>E. coli</italic> O157:H7 and bacterial diversity in corn silage contaminated with the pathogen and treated with chemical or microbial additives.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>1780</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1794</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2016-11745</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28041727</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogunade</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pech Cervantes</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vyas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Bacterial diversity and composition of alfalfa silage as analyzed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing: effects of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> O157:H7 and silage additives.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>101</volume> <fpage>2048</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2059</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2017-12876</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29274960</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pahlow</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muck</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driehuis</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oude Elferink</surname> <given-names>S. J. W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spoelstra</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Microbiology of ensiling</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Silage Science and Technology</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Buxton</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muck</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Madison, WI</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society of Agronomy</publisher-name>), <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronmonogr42.c2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Natural populations of lactic acid bacteria associated with silage fermentation as determined by phenotype, 16 S ribosomal RNA and recA gene analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Appl. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>241</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.syapm.2010.10.003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21282025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Dynamic changes in fermentation profiles and bacterial community composition during sugarcane top silage fermentation: a preliminary study.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol</italic>.</source> <volume>285</volume>:<fpage>121315</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121315</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30965280</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roberson</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Firestone</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Relationship between desiccation and exopolysaccharide production in a soil <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microb.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>1284</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1291</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.58.4.1284-1291.1992</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16348695</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schloss</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westcott</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryabin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hollister</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>7537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7541</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.01541-09</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19801464</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sepehri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarrafzadeh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Activity enhancement of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge process: metabolite reduction and CO2mitigation intensification process.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Water Sci.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>131</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13201-019-1017-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohba</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shimojo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masuda</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of early fermentation of Italian ryegrass (<italic>Lolium multiflorum</italic> Lam.)silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>1606</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1610</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Na</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Succession of bacterial community during the initial aerobic, intense fermentation, and stable phases of whole-plant corn silages treated with lactic acid bacteria suspensions prepared from other silages.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>655095</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2021.655095</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33841382</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tohno</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitahara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Irisawa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masuda</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uegaki</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohkuma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title><italic>Lactobacillus silagei</italic> sp. nov. Isolated from orchardgrass silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>4613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4618</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.053124-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23919960</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turula</surname> <given-names>V. E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gore</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arumugham</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Automation of the anthrone assay for carbohydrate concentration determinations.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Chem</italic>.</source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>1786</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1792</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac902664x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20121220</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Soest</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Sci.</italic></source> <volume>74</volume> <fpage>3583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3597</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>V&#x00E1;zquez-Baeza</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antonio</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data.</article-title> <source><italic>GigaScience</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>16</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The bacterial community and fermentation quality of mulberry (<italic>Morus alba</italic>) leaf silage with or without <italic>Lactobacillus casei</italic> and sucrose.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol</italic>.</source> <volume>293</volume> <fpage>122059</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122059</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31476563</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Modulation of metabolome and bacterial community in whole crop corn silage by inoculating homofermentative <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> and Heterofermentative <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>3299</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2018.03299</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30728817</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> inoculant.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol.</italic></source> <volume>275</volume> <fpage>280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.067</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30594838</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The reconstitution mechanism of napier grass microiota during the ensiling of alfalfa and their contributions to fermentation quality of silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol</italic>.</source> <volume>297</volume>:<fpage>122391</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122391</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31759854</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Analysis of the correlation between bacteria and fungi in sugarcane tops silage prior to and after aerobic exposure.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioresour. Technol</italic>.</source> <volume>291</volume>:<fpage>121835</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of inoculants and environmental temperature on fermentation quality and bacterial diversity of alfalfa silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Sci. J</italic>.</source> <volume>89</volume> <fpage>1085</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1092</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/asj.12961</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29845704</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Progress assessment of chemical indicators of silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Chinese J. Anim. Husbandry</italic>.</source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drouin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lafreniere</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effect of temperature (5-25&#x00B0;C) on epiphytic lactic acid bacteria populations and fermentation of whole-plant corn silage.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>121</volume> <fpage>657</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>671</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.13198</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27271320</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Technical measures for improving quality of silage maize in Southern area.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Husb. Feed Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Effects of citric acid and <italic>Lactobacillus plantarum</italic> on silage quality and bacterial diversity of king grass silage.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>631096</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.631096</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33717021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Natural fermentation quality and bacterial community of 12 pennisetum sinese varieties in Southern China.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>627820</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.627820</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33995292</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
