<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.906732</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. Enriched in Endophytic Community of Healthy Cotton Plants Inhibit Cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> Wilt</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Qingchao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/878136/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Man</surname> <given-names>Xiaowu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1743174/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Yucheng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Haiyang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/677954/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Tree Breeding by Molecular Design, Beijing Forestry University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>&#x00DC;r&#x00FC;mqi</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Jia Liu, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Bruno Brito Lisboa, Department of Agricultural Research and Diagnosis, State Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Brazil; Dilfuza Jabborova, Institute of Genetics and Plant Experimental Biology, Academy of Sciences Republic of Uzbekistan (UzAS), Uzbekistan</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Yucheng Dai, <email>yuchengdai@bjfu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Haiyang Liu, <email>liuhaiyang001@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Microbe and Virus Interactions with Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>906732</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Zeng, Man, Dai and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zeng, Man, Dai and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The plant microbiome plays a fundamental role in plant growth and health. However, detailed information regarding the plant endophytic microbiome during the infection period of a pathogen is largely unknown. Here, we investigated the microbial community of healthy and diseased cotton plants and the root exudate profiles of susceptible and resistant cultivars utilizing high-throughput sequencing and metabolomics. The results showed that the pathogen infection reduced bacterial diversity and significantly affected the bacterial community composition. The microbiome assembly is shaped predominantly by cultivars. The endophytic microbiome of the infected plants showed greater complexity than the healthy plants in network analysis. The results displayed that a total of 76 compounds were significantly different in the two groups, with 18 compounds showing a higher relative abundance in the resistant cultivars and 58 compounds in the susceptible cultivars. Pathway enrichment analysis showed that pathways related to plant hormone signal transduction, biosynthesis of various secondary metabolites, and biosynthesis and metabolism of amino acids were prominently altered. We also demonstrate that plants inoculated with <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. strains showed increased resistance to the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt compared with the control plants in pot experiments. Overall, it showed that the pathogen infection affected the community composition, and healthy plants displayed an enriched beneficial microbiome to combat the plant disease. These findings significantly advance our understanding of the endophytic microbiome assembly under the pathogen infection and develop microbiome-based solutions for sustainable crop production systems.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt</kwd>
<kwd>endophytic</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial community</kwd>
<kwd>microbiome assembly</kwd>
<kwd>beneficial microbe</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">China Postdoctoral Science Foundation<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002858</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="58"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="9701"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Plants host enormous diverse communities of microorganisms, and the plant microbiome, which equips the host plant with additional gene pools, is often referred to as the second plant genome or extended genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Berendsen et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Vandenkoornhuyse et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et al., 2019</xref>). The plant microbiome coevolved with the hosts and profoundly impacts a range of plant functions and fitness parameters, such as disease suppression, stress tolerance, and growth promotion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Carrion et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhuang et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, engineering the plant microbiome is increasingly considered as the goal of improving plant health and productivity. In recent years, more and more studies found that plants recruited certain beneficial microorganisms to resist the invasion of pathogens. For example, the resistant tomato variety Hawaii 7996 could recruit members of <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> to suppress plant disease for the rhizosphere microbiome. <italic>Astragalus mongholicus</italic> recruited some beneficial bacteria, such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Flavobacterium</italic>, to the rhizosphere and roots under the fungal pathogen infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kwak et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, understanding how plant modulates their microbiome under pathogen infection is the prerequisite for manipulating plant microbiome to enhance plant health.</p>
<p>The plant microbiome is influenced by multiple biotic and abiotic factors, such as genotype, soil properties, plant development stage, and pathogen infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Carrion et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al., 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhuang et al., 2021</xref>). Among them, pathogen invasion is one of the most important biotic stress factors that affect the microbiome assembly. The microbial diversity and composition were altered in the decaying sugar beet compared to that observed in the healthy plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kusstatscher et al., 2019</xref>). Meanwhile, the microbiome plays a key role in protecting plants from pathogens. Accumulating research on sugar beet, tomato, <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>, and wheat has shown that plants could recruit beneficial microbes for protecting plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Rudrappa et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Carrion et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lee et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et al., 2021a</xref>). The phyllosphere microbiome could protect <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> plants against the fungal pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Ritpitakphong et al., 2016</xref>). Rudrappa et al. displayed that <italic>A. thaliana</italic> leaf infections by <italic>P. syringae</italic> induced root exudation of malic acid that selectively recruited the beneficial <italic>Bacillus</italic> strain FB17 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Rudrappa et al., 2008</xref>). The mentioned results also showed that the below- and aboveground microbiome of plants have a close relationship. Furthermore, biostimulators and organic fertilizers are known to affect the plant microbiome and enrich beneficial microorganisms. The application of organic fertilizer showed that it improved resistance against plant pathogens and influenced the structure and function of the resident soil microbiome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Tao C. et al., 2020</xref>). Meantime, it has been reported that bacteriophages act as an alternative to pesticides to control pathogens and found that it did not affect the existing rhizosphere microbiome and enriched bacterial species which were antagonistic toward plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wang et al., 2019</xref>). Moreover, the glutamic acid modulated the composition of the microbiome community and enriched the <italic>Streptomyces</italic> populations to control the disease caused by <italic>Botrytis</italic> and <italic>Fusarium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kim et al., 2021</xref>). Other studies have displayed that the susceptible cultivars tend to form disease-suppressive soils more easily than the resistant cultivars. Interestingly, the root secretion patterns with the same plant species were different, which caused variation in the composition of the microbial community. For example, the susceptible cucumber secreted root exudates, such as organic acid, to assemble beneficial microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Weller et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wen et al., 2020</xref>). It reported that the host selection pressure increased from soil to endophytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). To date, most studies focused on the belowground (rhizosphere and soil microbiome) and phyllosphere microbiome. The detailed information on the plant endophytic microbiome during the infection period of a pathogen is largely unknown.</p>
<p>Cotton (<italic>Gossypium</italic> spp.) is one of the most important crops in the world due to its economic value in textile fiber, feed, foodstuff, oil, and biofuel products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Wu et al., 2021</xref>). Cotton plantation in Xinjiang is one of the most important cotton production regions worldwide and plays an important role in the economy. However, cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt, a devastating disease of cotton, is caused by the soil-borne plant fungus <italic>Verticillium dahliae</italic> Kleb and affected cotton production and quality. Long-term monocropping leads to a severe incidence of cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. Many genera, including <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, and <italic>Enterobacter</italic>, have documented biocontrol activities against cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Xue et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tao X. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al., 2021b</xref>). The underlying mechanisms are known to be involved in biological control, including reduced germination of inoculum, plant growth promotion, induced resistance, and antibiotic production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Deketelaere et al., 2017</xref>). The endophyte isolated from the plant&#x2019;s interior tissue improves plant resistance to pathogens. These traits make endophytes the potential natural resources for biological control. Endophytes are beneficial to the plants, including growth promotion and biological control against plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Erdogan and Benlioglu, 2010</xref>). The endophyte <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> PICF7 isolated from the roots of olive trees displayed the suppression of <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. The colonization by the endophyte in roots could trigger defense responses and compete for the niche with the pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Prieto et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">G&#x00F3;mez-Lama Caban&#x00E1;s et al., 2014</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> plays a vital role in the plant microbiome, particularly in plant growth promotion and disease suppression. For example, the <italic>B. velezensis</italic> SQR9 induced the enrichment of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. in the cucumber rhizosphere to promote plant growth based on the microbiome analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Sun et al., 2022</xref>). Meanwhile, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> was the key plant growth-promoting rhizosphere of garlic and has the ability to promote plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhuang et al., 2021</xref>). It has also been reported that <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, and <italic>Burkholderia</italic> showed higher abundances in the field with less incidence of disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). It is not clear why the healthy plants selected specific endophytic bacterial genus to inhibit the phytopathogens. Here, we used two types of cotton cultivars with different phenotypes under the pathogen infection. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the endophytic bacterial communities from healthy and diseased plants infected with cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt for susceptible and resistant cultivars and (2) determine whether enrichment with microorganisms in healthy cotton plants could confer disease prevention. To address the above questions, we first examined the dynamics of endophytic bacterial communities of cotton plants with and without disease symptoms for two cultivars. Second, we isolated two strains of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. that were enriched in healthy plants and checked the effect of inhibition on cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. In addition, we analyzed the root metabolism of susceptible and resistant cultivars. The overall results advance our understanding of the microbiome assembly under the influence of pathogen infection and develop microbiome-based solutions for sustainable crop production systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Experimental Design and Sample Collection</title>
<p>The experiment was designed in the main cotton production fields of Korla (41&#x00B0;45&#x2019;2.39&#x201D;N, 85&#x00B0;48&#x2019;4.69&#x201D;E), Xinjiang province, Northwest China. The site is located in the temperate continental climate zone, with the same annual mean temperature of 11&#x00B0;C and annual mean precipitation of 58.6 mm. The cotton cultivars used in this study were Zhongzhimian No. 2 (resistant cultivar) and Junmian No. 1 (susceptible cultivar). The cotton plants were sampled in June 2017. Briefly, the 2,500 m<sup>2</sup> cotton field was selected as the experiment area, and 400 kg of <italic>V. dahliae</italic> was added when the cotton was planted in 2014 and 2015. The disease symptom was observed in 2014. Cotton plants in the experimental area that displayed no wilt or disease symptoms were classified as healthy plants, while the plants in the experimental area that showed wilt or obvious disease symptoms were classified as diseased plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). Three replicates of healthy and diseased cotton plants were collected from three adjacent plots, and each replicate consisted of a composite sample obtained by mixing five individual samples. The leaves of the cotton plant were discarded, and the stem was cut into small parts and stored in a 50 mL tube. All the samples were kept in cold conditions and later transferred to the laboratory and stored at &#x2013;80&#x00B0;C before further processing. The soil type in the designed field was loam sandy soil. The pH, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium concentration, and organic matter were 7.98, 0.42 g/kg, 0.67 g/kg, 16.51 g/kg, and 8.94 g/kg, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>DNA Extraction and Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Amplification</title>
<p>For microbial DNA extraction from the endosphere, the plant stem materials were placed in sterile tubes containing phosphate-buffered saline buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4) and sonicated at 50 kHz for 90 s. This procedure was repeated three times. Then, the plant stem material was rinsed with 75% ethanol for 2 min, then the sample was washed with 1% NaCIO for 1 min, and finally washed again with sterile H<sub>2</sub>O for three times, to ensure surface sterilization. Then, the stem material was ground using sterile mortar with liquid nitrogen to extract DNA. Total DNA was extracted from the plant using Plant DNA mini kit (Omega, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The quality and quantity of DNA were measured using NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). For the 16S rRNA gene library, the V3-V4 region was amplified using the universal primers 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Huws et al., 2007</xref>). The PCR reaction was performed in 10 &#x03BC;L volume, containing 0.3 &#x03BC;L of both primers (10 &#x03BC;M), 50 ng of template DNA, 5 &#x03BC;L of KOD FX Neo buffer, and 0.2 &#x03BC;L of KOD FX Neo (TOYOBO, Shanghai, China). Amplification was carried out with the following PCR program: initial denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95&#x00B0;C for 30 s, 50&#x00B0;C for 30 s, and 72&#x00B0;C for 40 s, and final elongation at 72&#x00B0;C for 7 min. The library quality was assessed using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. Finally, the library was sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform at Biomarker Co., Ltd (Beijing, China), and 250 bp paired-end reads were generated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Bioinformatics Analysis</title>
<p>Raw sequences were split according to their unique barcodes, and the adaptors and primer sequences were trimmed using their own script from the company. Paired-end sequences were merged using FLASH software 1.2.11 with the default parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Magoc and Salzberg, 2011</xref>). Then, the amplicon data were analyzed using a combination of the VSEARCH v2.13.3 and QIIME 1.9.1. software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Caporaso et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zgadzaj et al., 2016</xref>). The resultant sequences were quality-filtered, and singletons were removed in VSEARCH. The sequence reads were then clustered into OTUs at 97% similarity level. Chimeric sequences that were identified using the reference-based chimera checking methods were removed from the data. Representative sequences were classified using the blast algorithm with the SILVA (v.13.2) reference database in QIIME (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Quast et al., 2013</xref>). Mitochondrial and chloroplastic DNA sequences, and OTUs with a total relative abundance of &#x003C; 0.00001 in all of the samples were discarded. The raw sequencing data have been submitted to the Sequence Read Archive under accession number <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA820148">PRJNA820148</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Root Exudate Collection and UHPLC-QE-MS Detection</title>
<p>The sample was prepared as previously reported, with little modification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wen et al., 2020</xref>). For extraction, 50 mg of sample was taken and placed in an EP tube, and then 1,000 &#x03BC;L of extraction solvent containing an internal target was added (<italic>V</italic><sub><italic>methanol</italic></sub>: <italic>V</italic><sub><italic>acetonitrile</italic></sub>: <italic>V</italic><sub><italic>water</italic></sub> = 2:2:1, which was kept at &#x2013;20&#x00B0;C before extraction). The mixtures were homogenized in a ball mill for 4 min at 45 Hz, and then ultrasound treated for 5 min (incubated in ice water). After homogenization for three times, the sample was incubated for 1 h at &#x2013;20&#x00B0;C to precipitate the proteins, and then centrifuged at 4&#x00B0;C and 12,000 rpm for 15 min. Next, the supernatant (500 &#x03BC;L) was transferred into a fresh tube, the extracts were dried in a vacuum concentrator without heating, and 100 &#x03BC;L of extraction solvent was added (<italic>V</italic><sub><italic>acetonitrile</italic></sub>: <italic>V</italic><sub><italic>water</italic></sub> = 1:1) for reconstitution. The sample was vortexed for 30 s, sonicated for 10 min (4&#x00B0;C water bath), and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 rpm and 4&#x00B0;C. Then, the supernatant (60 &#x03BC;L) was transferred to a fresh 2 mL LC/MS glass vial for the UHPLC-QTOF-MS analysis.</p>
<p>The UHPLC-QTOF-MS analysis was performed using a UHPLC system (1290, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, United States) with a UPLC BEH Amide column (1.72 &#x03BC;m, 2.1&#x002A;100 mm, Waters, Milford, CT, United States) coupled to TripleTOF 6600 (QTOF, AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, United States). The mobile phase consisted of 25 mM NH<sub>4</sub>OAc and 25 mM NH<sub>4</sub>OH in water (pH = 9.75) (A) and acetonitrile (B), and elution was carried out with elution gradient as follows: 0 min, 95% B; 7 min, 65% B; 9 min, 40% B; 9.1 min, 95% B; and 12 min, 95% B, which were delivered at 0.5 mL min<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. The injection volume was 2 &#x03BC;L. The Triple TOF mass spectrometer was used due to its ability to acquire MS/MS spectra on an information-dependent basis (IDA) during an LC/MS experiment. In this mode, the acquisition software (Analyst TF 1.7, AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, United States) continuously evaluates the full-scan survey MS data as it collects and triggers the acquisition of MS/MS spectra depending on the preselected criteria. In each cycle, 12 precursor ions whose intensity was greater than 100 were chosen for fragmentation at the collision energy (CE) of 30 V (15 MS/MS events with a product ion accumulation time of 50 ms each). The following settings were used: ion source gas 1 at 60 Psi, ion source gas 2 as 60 Psi, curtain gas at 35 Psi, source temperature at 650&#x00B0;C, and ion spray voltage floating (ISVF) at 5,000 V or &#x2013;4,000 V in positive or negative modes, respectively.</p>
<p>MS raw data (.wiff) files were converted to the mzXML format using ProteoWizard and processed by R package XCMS (version 3.2). The preprocessing results generated a data matrix that consisted of the retention time (RT), mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) values, and peak intensity. R package CAMERA was used for peak annotation after data processing by XCMS. An in-house MS2 database was applied for the identification of metabolites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>The OTU table was rarefied to reads (lowest number of 3,616 for bacterial community) for alpha-diversity and was used as a normalization method for beta-diversity analysis. Bacterial alpha-diversity (observed OTUs and Shannon index) values were calculated using QIIME. The significant differences were evaluated with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bacterial beta-diversity was estimated according to the Bray-Curtis distance between samples. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed with 1,000 permutations using the adonis function in vegan R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). The Venn diagram was drawn using the OECloud tools<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup> to analyze common and specific OTUs for healthy and disease plants of different cultivars. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was applied (Wilcoxon <italic>P</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.05 and logarithmic LDA (linear discriminant analysis) score &#x003E; 2)<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote2">2</xref></sup> to identify the biomarkers of healthy and diseased plants and different cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). Welch&#x2019;s test was used to calculate the significance of differences between different healthy conditions using STAMP software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Parks et al., 2014</xref>). Differential abundance analysis was performed using EdgeR&#x2019;s generalized linear model (GLM) approach, and the differential OTUs with false discovery rate-corrected <italic>P</italic>-values &#x003C; 0.05 were identified as indicator OTUs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Robinson et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The network analysis based on Pearson correlation scores was performed using the CoNet in CYTOSCAPE v3.8 and visualized in GEPHI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Shannon et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). Briefly, only robust (Pearson&#x2019;s <italic>r</italic> &#x003E; 0.9 and <italic>r</italic> &#x003C; &#x2013;0.9) and statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) correlations were retained for the next step. The &#x2018;benjaminihochberg&#x2019; multiple testing correction (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) was performed at bootstrap step restore network step. The topological indices of the networks were calculated in Gephi. Network modular analysis was conducted in Gephi with default parameters. The network complexity was defined according to previous research, and nodes with high degree (&#x003E;30) and closeness centrality (&#x003E;0.6) values were identified as hub nodes in the network (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agler et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">van der Heijden and Hartmann, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wagg et al., 2019</xref>). Analysis was conducted in R 3.0.6 or GraphPad Prism 7.</p>
<p>To investigate the metabolism of different cultivars, if the metabolite feature is detected in &#x003C;20% of experimental samples or is detected in &#x003C;50% of quality control samples, then it is deleted from the data analysis. Then the missing values of raw data were filled up by half of the minimum value. In addition, the internal standard normalization method was employed in this data analysis. Finally, features with a relative standard deviation &#x003E; 30% should be removed from the subsequent analysis. The resulting three-dimensional data involving the peak number, sample names, and normalized peak area were fed into R package metaX for principal component analysis (PCA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Wen et al., 2017</xref>). PCA showed the distribution of origin data. The first principal component of variable importance in the projection (VIP) was obtained. The VIP values summarize the contribution of each variable to the model. The metabolites with VIP &#x003E; 1 and <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 (student <italic>t</italic>-test) were considered as significantly altered metabolites. In addition, commercial databases including KEGG<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote3">3</xref></sup> and MetaboAnalyst<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote4">4</xref></sup> were utilized to search the pathways of metabolites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>Strain Isolation, Identification, and Greenhouse Experiment</title>
<p>The fresh cotton plants were sampled for the isolation of endophytic bacteria. The method used to isolate the endophytic bacteria was reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zhang et al., 2017</xref>). First, the surface of the cotton plants was sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 s, immersed in 2% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min, and rinsed four times with sterile distilled water. Then, 3 g of surface-sterilized cotton plants was collected and ground in 5 mL of sterilized water. The resultant suspension was plated on Luria-Bertani (LB, 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 10 g/L NaCl) and King&#x2019;s B (KB, 20 g/L protease peptone No. 3, 1.5 g/L K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 1.5 g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub>&#x22C5;7H<sub>2</sub>O, and 10% glycerol) plate after 10 &#x00D7; dilution. The plates were then incubated at 30&#x00B0;C for 2 days. Colonies of different morphology were transferred onto new LB and KB plates for further characterization. All isolates were purified and stored at &#x2013;80&#x00B0;C in a nutrient broth containing 15% glycerol. DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing were performed as described by a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zhao H. et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhuang et al., 2021</xref>). The antagonistic activity of the isolates against cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt was evaluated using the methods reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al. (2021b)</xref>. Briefly, spores of <italic>V. dahliae</italic> were diluted to 8 &#x00D7; 10<sup>5</sup> mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> and 200 &#x03BC;L was inoculated on plates containing potato dextrose agar (PDA, 200 g/L potato and 20 g/L glucose). Then, the plates were permitted to dry under a laminar flow hood. Portions of cultures (3 &#x03BC;L) of strains were added to the center of plates, and the zone of inhibition was measured after incubation at 30&#x00B0;C for 4 days.</p>
<p>The greenhouse experiments also evaluated the capacity of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. to control cotton wilt disease. First, cotton seeds were sterilized in 1.5% NaOCl for 10 min with gentle shaking and washed four times with ddH<sub>2</sub>O. Subsequently, the sterilized seeds soaked in the bacterial suspension (28&#x00B0;C, 200 rpm for 12 h) at room temperature for 2 h and seeds soaked in LB or water were used as the control samples. Then, one seed was sown in each pot (the ratio of sterilized nutrient soil to vermiculite is 3:1). Six pots were used for each replicate, and three replicates were used for each isolated bacterial strain. The cotton plants were placed in the growth chamber at 28&#x00B0;C with 12-h light/12-h dark conditions. When the second euphylla appeared, 10 mL spores of <italic>V. dahliae</italic> (1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup>mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) were added to the soil of the cotton plant, and this process was repeated every 2 days. In total, 30 mL spores of <italic>V. dahliae</italic> were added. The disease index of cotton plants was calculated after 40 days. Cotton plants were checked for severity based on the disease index described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gu et al., 2021</xref>). Briefly, we rated the disease severity on a scale from 0 to 6 according to the percentage of symptoms. The score of 0 indicated no visible symptoms, and score of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 described 0&#x2013;10%, 11&#x2013;25%, 26&#x2013;50%, 51-75%, 76&#x2013;90%, and &#x003E;90%, discoloration or defoliation, respectively. The disease index was calculated as follows:</p>
<p>Disease index = [&#x03A3;(Rating &#x00D7; Number of diseased plants)/Total number of plants &#x00D7; Highest rating] &#x00D7; 100</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Assembly Patterns of the Healthy and Diseased Cotton Plants</title>
<p>The endophytic bacterial community of cotton plants was characterized by Illumina HiSeq sequencing. In total, 803,958 high-quality sequences were obtained, and each sample contained between 65,586 and 68,096 (66,997 &#x00B1; 643) reads. All the sequences were clustered into 700 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with &#x003E; 97% similarity. Meantime, we also checked the disease index of different cultivars, and the results showed that the disease index of susceptible cultivars was significantly higher than that of the resistant cultivars in the experimental area (unpaired <italic>t-</italic>test, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<p>Alpha-diversity of healthy and diseased cotton plants was measured by Shannon and observed OTU indices. It showed that the alpha-diversity values of healthy plants were higher than those of the diseased plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). Meanwhile, we also compared the alpha-diversity of different cultivars and found that the alpha-diversity values of susceptible cultivars were higher than those of the resistant cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). Subsequently, the samples were divided by cultivars and analyzed separately. The results displayed that the values of healthy plants were higher than those of the diseased plants for resistant cultivars. However, the index of diseased plants was higher than that of the healthy plants for susceptible plants, but the difference was not found to be significant (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>The alpha-diversity measurements based on the bacterial endophytic bacterial community. <bold>(A)</bold> For different healthy conditions. <bold>(B)</bold> For different cultivars.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-906732-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Co-occurrence Patterns of Bacterial Community of Healthy and Diseased Cotton Plants</title>
<p>To investigate how cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt affects the co-occurrence patterns of the cotton endophytic community, we analyzed the bacterial community network of healthy and diseased plants. Based on the network analysis, we found that the healthy conditions showed an effect on network complexity. The average degree was used to assess the network complexity and showed that the endophytic bacterial community of the diseased plants (8.03 and 4.95) was more complex than that of the healthy plants (5.55 and 2.89, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Additionally, the results also displayed that the susceptible cultivars possessed a higher degree than the resistant cultivars in healthy and diseased conditions. Furthermore, the number of &#x201C;hub nodes&#x201D; [nodes with high values of degree (&#x003E;30) and closeness centrality (&#x003E;0.6) in the network] from the diseased samples was higher than that of the healthy plants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The taxonomic composition of the networks differed between healthy and diseased cotton plants, with most nodes annotated to Clostridia for diseased plants and Gammaproteobacteria for healthy plants of susceptible cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Moreover, we recorded a higher ratio of positive to negative correlations in diseased cotton plants for susceptible and resistant cultivars. In addition, a higher average path distance was found in the healthy cotton plants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Network visualization of the interaction architecture in bacterial community of healthy and diseased cotton plants.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-906732-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Topological properties of the co-occurrence networks of healthy and diseased cotton plants.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Category</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Average degree</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Node</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Edge</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Positive edge</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Negative edge</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Ratio of positive to negative correlations</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Modularity</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Average clustering coefficient</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Average path distance</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Hub node</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Susceptible cotton</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Healthy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">153</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">849</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">500</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">349</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.845</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.059</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diseased</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">216</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1734</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1246</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">488</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.855</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.989</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Resistant cotton</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/><td valign="top" align="center"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Healthy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">124</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">358</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">192</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">166</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.708</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.118</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diseased</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">128</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">633</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">412</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">221</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.847</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.079</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Differences in Endophytic Bacterial Community Between Healthy and Diseased Cotton Plants</title>
<p>The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of microbial communities revealed a clear separation between the cotton plants of different cultivars. The two main coordinates extracted explained 41.62% of the variation, of which PC1 explained 23.63% of the variation and PC2 explained 17.99% of the variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Moreover, the cultivars had a significant influence on the endophytic bacterial community (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 14.98%, <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Furthermore, hierarchical clustering analysis revealed a separate clustering between healthy and diseased plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS4">Supplementary Figure 4</xref>). The results also showed that the healthy conditions had a strong effect on the bacterial endophytic community.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Comparative analysis of the endophytic bacterial community under different healthy conditions. <bold>(A)</bold> Unconstrained principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of beta-diversity using Bray-Curtis distances of the bacterial community in healthy and diseased samples. <bold>(B)</bold> Venn diagrams showing the shared and specific bacterial OTUs among the healthy and diseased samples of different cultivars. <bold>(C)</bold> Relative abundance of the abundant bacterial taxa in healthy and diseased cotton plants. <bold>(D)</bold> Differential abundance analysis of bacterial OTUs in healthy and diseased samples, and Welch&#x2019;s test was performed to calculate the significance of differences at the family level. <bold>(E)</bold> The biomarker taxa of bacterial communities among healthy and diseased cotton plants. Only the top five most specific biomarker taxonomies are displayed.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-906732-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The bacterial composition at the phylum level was analyzed in the cotton samples. We found that the most abundant bacterial phyla were Alphaproteobacteria (45.4%), Gammaproteobacteria (22.3%), Actinobacteria (21.8%), Bacteroidetes (5.5%), and Firmicutes (3.7%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>). In addition, taxonomic classification showed that <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic> was the most abundant bacteria in healthy and diseased cotton plants at the family level. Furthermore, we found that the population of <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic> was significantly increased in the healthy cotton plants at the family level, whereas <italic>Streptococcaceae</italic> was significantly decreased in the healthy cotton plants compared with diseased cotton plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3D</xref>). Meanwhile, the LEfSe results showed that <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic> and Patescibacteria were the biomarker taxa for healthy and diseased cotton plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3E</xref>).</p>
<p>To determine which OTUs are responsible for the healthy conditions and cultivar effect, we performed OTU analysis with OTUs identified from healthy and diseased plants, and different cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). In the resistant cultivars, we identified 8 and 25 OTUs that were specifically observed in healthy and diseased plants, respectively. The OTUs that were specifically noticed in healthy plants primarily correspond to Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiae. In contrast, the diseased plants specifically showed the presence of Clostridia, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteroidia, Deinococci, and Negativicutes at the class level. For the susceptible cultivars, nine OTUs consisting of Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Gammaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiae were specifically selected by healthy plants, and 35 OTUs belonging to Clostridia, Bacteroidia, Alphaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Acidimicrobiia, Nitrospira, Verrucomicrobiae, Nitriliruptoria, and Melainabacteria were specifically selected by diseased plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Furthermore, the Venn diagram analysis of all samples indicated that the diseased plants (84) had higher specific OTUs than the healthy plants (24). The OTUs selected by healthy plants annotated as Ruminococcaceae, Opitutaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Weeksellaceae, Microscillaceae, and Nocardioidaceae, while the OTUs selected by diseased plants belonged to Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Muribaculaceae, Burkholderiaceae, and Chitinophagaceae (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS5">Supplementary Figure 5A</xref>). In addition, we found that the susceptible cultivars (81) possessed more specific OTUs than the resistant cultivars (49). The 81 OTUs mainly corresponded to Ruminococcaceae, Muribaculaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, Flavobacteriaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, and Chitinophagaceae, and the 49 OTUs mainly corresponded to Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, and Weeksellaceae at the family level (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS5">Supplementary Figure 5B</xref>).</p>
<p>Remarkably, the different abundance analysis indicated that two OTUs which corresponded to Xanthomonadaceae and Saccharimonadaceae at the family level were significantly enriched in the diseased plants. In contrast, one OTU, belonging to <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, was significantly depleted in the diseased plants. However, there were no enriched or depleted OTUs in the susceptible cultivars and all the samples (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS5">Supplementary Figures 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS6">6</xref>). For the different cultivars, we found that three and six OTUs were significantly enriched in resistant and susceptible cultivars, respectively. In the resistant cultivars, the OTUs belonged to Burkholderiaceae, Moraxellaceae, and Opitutaceae at the family level, and in the susceptible cultivars, the OTUs corresponded to Pseudomonadaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Cellvibrionaceae, and Ruminococcaceae (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS5">Supplementary Figure 5D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Root Exudate Profiles of the Resistant and Susceptible Cotton Cultivars</title>
<p>The root exudates of resistant and susceptible cotton cultivars were analyzed by UHPLC-QE-MS after collecting from cotton root samples. A total of 3,777 peaks were detected, and 212 compounds were identified across all the samples, including lipids and lipid-like molecules, benzenoids, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxygen compounds, organoheterocyclic compounds, phenylpropanoids and polyketides, and nucleosides, nucleotides, and analogs at the superclass level. The overall exudation patterns of the resistant and susceptible cotton plants were found to be distinct. The first two components of the PCA explained 93.9% of the total variance (79.4 and 14.5% for PC1 and PC2, respectively), and this analysis clearly separated the susceptible and resistant samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). Furthermore, the data revealed the presence of multiple metabolites that showed significant differences in abundance between susceptible and resistant cultivars according to the VIP thresholds (VIP &#x003E; 1) and the student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). A total of 76 compounds were found to be significantly different between these two cultivars. Specifically, 18 compounds showed a higher relative abundance in the resistant cultivars, and 58 compounds showed a higher relative abundance in the susceptible cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). To further reveal the relative content of all the annotated and significantly differentially expressed metabolites in the two cultivars and determine their relationships, cluster analysis was conducted, and the results were presented as a heatmap (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>). The susceptible cultivars had more number of differentially expressed metabolites. Then, the pathway analysis based on the significantly different metabolites was carried out using the KEGG enrichment analysis. The results displayed that pathways related to plant hormone signal transduction (salicylic acid), biosynthesis of various secondary metabolites, biosynthesis and metabolism of amino acids, including tryptophan, alanine, aspartate, glutamate, cysteine, and methionine, and zeatin biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>) were significantly altered.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Analysis of exudation profiles between resistant and susceptible cotton cultivars. <bold>(A)</bold> PCA plot of the root exudate profiles of two cotton cultivars. <bold>(B)</bold> The comparison of volcano plots of differentially expressed metabolites between the resistant and susceptible cultivars. <bold>(C)</bold> Heatmap of identified differentially expressed metabolites from resistant and susceptible samples. <bold>(D)</bold> Pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites from resistant and susceptible cultivars. XZ is the resistant cultivar and JM is the susceptible cultivar.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-906732-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. Exhibited Stronger Inhibition to <italic>Verticillium</italic> Wilt of Cotton</title>
<p>To further characterize the antagonist effect of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. on the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt, we isolated 30 candidate bacteria from the healthy cotton plants. In total, two bacterial isolates were obtained and phylogenetically characterized based on the distinct 16S rDNA gene sequence, allowing us to recover strains for further studies. The results indicated that these two strains belonged to the genus <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and inhibited the growth of cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt on the PDA plate, and the diameters of the inhibition zone were 29.67 &#x00B1; 2.08 and 31.33 &#x00B1; 1.53 for strains N1 and L4, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A,B</xref>). Furthermore, we were curious to know if the <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. played a role in the control of the cotton wilt under greenhouse conditions. The results displayed that the disease index of cotton plants treated with the strains L4 and N1 was significantly lower than that of the control plants. There were no significant differences in the disease index between control and LB-treated plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5C,D</xref>). Importantly, all inoculation treatments could promote plant growth. The height of plants treated with <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. strains N1 and L4 was significantly higher than that of the control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5E</xref>). The results displayed that <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. promoted the growth of cotton plants and protected the plants by inhibiting the growth of <italic>V. dahlia</italic>.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Effect of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. on the cotton wilt disease. <bold>(A)</bold> Effect of single bacterial strain (N1 and L4) on the <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt of cotton. <bold>(B)</bold> Diameter of inhibition zone of single bacteria strain (N1 and L4). Error bars indicate &#x00B1; SD of three replicates. <bold>(C)</bold> The phenotypes of cotton inoculated with single bacteria after 40 days of growth in a growth chamber. Effect of the single bacteria (N1 and L4) on the disease index <bold>(D)</bold> and the height of cotton plants <bold>(E)</bold>. &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A; Represents obvious differences at <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001 compared with the control.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmicb-13-906732-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Here, the microbial community of healthy and diseased cotton plants, and the root exudate profiles of susceptible and resistant cultivars were surveyed using high-throughput sequencing and metabolomics analysis. The bacterial diversity and the composition of the bacterial community were affected by the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. Meanwhile, more differentially expressed metabolites were found in susceptible cultivars. Furthermore, the results showed that <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains were enriched in healthy cotton plants of resistant cultivars and inhibited the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. These findings provided a strategy for developing microbiome-based methods to control cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt.</p>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>The Assembly Pattern of Diseased and Healthy Cotton Plants</title>
<p>The microbiome of the plant plays a crucial role in plant health. Microbial diversity and distinct changes in the microbial community were previously shown to be related to the disease incidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Berg et al., 2017</xref>). In the current study, we found that the alpha-diversity of the diseased plants was higher than that of the healthy plants for the endophytic bacterial microbiome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The previous studies found that the bacterial diversities of infected root and stem samples were significantly higher than those of the healthy plants. The pathogen disrupted the plant defense system, which allowed entry to more number of organisms into the plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>). Moreover, the results also showed that the infected samples had lower bacterial diversity compared to the healthy samples based on the healthy and decaying sugar beets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kusstatscher et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Liu et al., 2019</xref>). The decrease in the microbial diversity of plants was probably related to the invasion by the pathogenic species into the communities. The plant microbiome was found to be affected by many factors, such as soil properties, plant genotype, plant developmental stage, and background microbial composition of the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Qiao et al., 2017</xref>). We also found that the different cotton cultivars affected the composition of the bacterial microbiome (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Furthermore, the plant developmental stage had an impact on the microbial community. The richness indices of the bacterial species in the shoot and roots increased with the growth of the banana plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Liu et al., 2019</xref>). The endosphere microbiome of cotton during plant growth and disease development should be further studied.</p>
<p>In addition, we found that the alpha-diversity in the susceptible cultivars was higher than that of the resistant cultivars regardless of the healthy conditions in the bacterial community, which is consistent with the findings in a previous study, which showed that cucumbers susceptible to <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> f. sp. <italic>cucumerinum</italic> exhibited higher bacterial community evenness than the resistant variety of cucumber (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wen et al., 2020</xref>). High diversity was observed in the susceptible cultivars, which could be attributed to a relatively high variety of exudates supporting more microbial niches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wen et al., 2020</xref>). We also found that the susceptible cultivars had more different abundant compounds compared with the resistant cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Furthermore, we displayed that the network complexity of diseased plants was more complex than that of healthy plants, and the results were consistent with the previous report (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The pathogenic produce positive feedback that enhances their competitiveness and subsequent interactions with the neighbors by changing the composition. Importantly, the highly connected and modular microbiota could prime the plant immune system for accelerated activation of defense against the pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Disease-Induced Changes in Endophytic Bacterial Microbiome Composition</title>
<p>Plants can alter their microbiome composition upon pathogen infection and recruit some disease-resistance and growth-promoting beneficial microbes for their survival. For instance, the relative abundances of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, and <italic>Falsibacillus</italic>, which are often considered to be plant-beneficial bacteria, showed a significant decrease in the diseased plants when compared to the healthy plants. These genera colonize different plant compartments and play a vital role in modulating host performance, particularly in the suppression of plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Berendsen et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>). In the present study, the comparative analysis of the composition of the healthy and diseased plants showed that the healthy plants were enriched in <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic>, which is also the biomarker taxa of healthy plants, and diseased plants were enriched in <italic>Streptococcaceae</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3D,E</xref>). Moreover, we found that the healthy plants were enriched in one OTU, annotated as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and the diseased plants were enriched in two OTUs, classified as <italic>Xanthomonadaceae</italic> and <italic>Saccharimonadaceae</italic>, of resistant cultivars (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS6">Supplementary Figure 6</xref>). The enriched OTUs of healthy plants probably play an important role in protecting the plants from cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. This finding is consistent with the previous report (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Yuan et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). Furthermore, the results displayed that the healthy plants and resistant cultivars contained specific OTUs corresponding to Sphingobacteriaceae, which included the biocontrol genus of <italic>Sphingobacterium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Xu et al., 2020</xref>). We also need to confirm the capable of suppression cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. However, recent studies have reported that several potential beneficial bacteria, such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, and <italic>Bacillus</italic>, were enriched in diseased plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gao M. et al., 2021</xref>). The opposite results observed in different plant species need further exploration.</p>
<p>Deciphering the composition of the healthy and diseased plants is critical for harnessing the plant microbiome to enhance plant growth and health. The previous studies showed that Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia were the major taxa in the cotton rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Qiao et al., 2017</xref>), while we found that Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were the main taxa in the cotton endophytic bacterial community (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>). There are some differences between rhizosphere and endophytic communities, and the crop microbiome is mainly derived from soil and is gradually enriched and filtered at different plant compartment niches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>). The soil microorganisms likely affect the pathogen migration, and the interaction between plant endophytes and soil microorganisms facilitates the pathogen invasion process. It was found that pathogen invasion may begin in the bulk soils, then transfer to the plant roots, and further infect the plant stems, causing bacterial wilt by <italic>Ralstonia</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>). Under stress conditions, a plant could attract distant beneficial microbes by actively releasing root exudates, such as amino acids, nucleotides, and long-chain organic acids. Based on the metabolism results, we found that the susceptible cultivars had more differentially expressed metabolic pathways (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). Pathway enrichment analysis showed that differentially expressed metabolic pathways were related to plant hormone signal transduction, biosynthesis of various secondary metabolites, and biosynthesis and metabolism of amino acids (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). Importantly, the amino acids could induce plant growth through rhizosphere bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zhao et al., 2019</xref>). The relationship between rhizosphere and root exudates needs further study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>The Pathogen Growth Inhibition and Plant Disease Control</title>
<p><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. are widely used as biocontrol agents to combat plant diseases. In the previous study, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. could directly inhibit the growth of cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. In the meantime, the abundances of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> in the soil microbial community with less incidence had higher abundances change are higher (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Erdogan and Benlioglu, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). The <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> was the key plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in the rhizosphere of garlic plants and had the ability to promote plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhuang et al., 2021</xref>). The genera of <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> are the most dominant biocontrol strains in the market, and these two genera could coexist and cooperate with each other. The bio-organic fertilizers stimulate the increase of the <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. in the soil microbiome to enhance plant disease suppression, and <italic>B. velezensis</italic> SQR9 induced the enrichment of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. in the rhizosphere and promoted the growth of cucumber plants synergistically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Tao C. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Yin et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Sun et al., 2022</xref>). Moreover, the cotton rhizosphere soil was temporarily altered after applying <italic>B. axarquiensis</italic> strain. Among them, <italic>Streptococcus</italic> and <italic>Pontibacter</italic> were decreased, and <italic>Lysobacter</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> were significantly increased (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gao C. et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, we found that two <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains could inhibit the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt under the laboratory and greenhouse conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). However, it has been reported that complex microbial community assemblages rather than single microbial strains protected plants from pathogen infection based on multiomics sequencing technologies. More number of studies revealed that the synthetic communities could be applied to achieve sustainable agriculture. The seven microbiome strains together showed better protection of maize roots against <italic>Fusarium verticillioides</italic> infection than the individual strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Niu et al., 2017</xref>). The members of <italic>Chitinophagaceae</italic> and <italic>Flavobacteriaceae</italic> were enriched in the plant endosphere following pathogen invasion, and reconstruction of a synthetic community of <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> and <italic>Chitinophaga</italic> consistently suppresses fungal root disease against sugar beet <italic>Rhizoctonia</italic> damping-off disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Carrion et al., 2019</xref>). Importantly, the enriched bacteria acted as an early warning agent by activating the salicylic acid and jasmonic acid pathways in the presence of the pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et al., 2021a</xref>). Also, the results revealed that beneficial bacteria showing high abundance and low abundance performed different functions. The high-abundance bacteria mainly protected the plants by promoting plant growth and inhibiting pathogen invasion, while the low-abundance bacteria controlled the diseases by inducing resistant systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Ritpitakphong et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jack and Nelson, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et al., 2021</xref>). <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. could colonize the roots of plants and produce antibiotics to control the disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tao X. et al., 2020</xref>). Moreover, the endophyte <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> PICF7 could trigger defense responses and compete in the niche with the pathogen in roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Prieto et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">G&#x00F3;mez-Lama Caban&#x00E1;s et al., 2014</xref>). In this study, it displayed strong inhibition of cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt when the cotton plant was treated with isolated <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains, and it also promoted the plant growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). We further need to confirm the mechanism by which isolated <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains prevent the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, we provide comprehensive evidence that the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt affects the endophytic microbiome based on the sequencing method. In particular, the healthy plants could recruit beneficial bacteria, such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, to suppress the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. Further investigations showed that the isolated <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains could inhibit the cotton <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt. These findings suggest that the endophyte could develop microbiome-based solutions for sustainable crop production. However, additional studies are needed to confirm the obtained results, owing to the fact that the study was performed in the late growth stage of cotton in Korla.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI (accession: <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA820148">PRJNA820148</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>YD and HL designed the experiment. QZ and XM analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. HL collected the samples from the field. All authors approved the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="pudiscl1" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160624) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M660508).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.906732/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.906732/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="FS1" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>The experimental design and symptoms of the diseased and healthy plants. <bold>(A)</bold> The process adopted to construct the experimental field. <bold>(B)</bold> The picture of the cotton plant from the experimental area. <bold>(C)</bold> The infected plants were found in the field. <bold>(D)</bold> The symptoms of the diseased and healthy stems of the cotton plant. <bold>(E)</bold> The culture isolates were obtained from the diseased plants.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.TIF" id="FS2" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>The disease index of susceptible and resistant cultivars in the field experiment. Values are representative of three plots. The analysis was performed using a <italic>t</italic>-test. <sup>&#x2217;&#x2217;&#x2217;</sup><italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.TIF" id="FS3" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>The comparative analysis of alpha-diversity indices. <bold>(A)</bold> The observed and Shannon index of different healthy conditions divided by cultivars. <bold>(B)</bold> The observed and Shannon index of different cultivars divided by plant healthy conditions.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.TIF" id="FS4" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Hierarchical clustering of the bacterial samples based on Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity. Samples were clustered according to the complete method.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_5.TIF" id="FS5" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>The specific and common OTUs between different healthy conditions and cultivars. <bold>(A)</bold> The different healthy conditions. <bold>(B)</bold> The different cultivars. <bold>(C)</bold> The enriched OTUs in healthy and diseased plants based on all samples. <bold>(D)</bold> The enriched OTUs in susceptible and resistant cultivars based on all samples.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_6.TIF" id="FS6" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 6</label>
<caption><p>The volcano plot illustrating the enriched OTUs for resistant and susceptible samples. Each point represents a single OTU. Each red point represents an individual enriched OTU for diseased plants and each blue point represents an individual enriched OTU for healthy plants.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.XLSX" id="TS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 1</label>
<caption><p>The specific OTUs for healthy and diseased samples of different cultivars.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agler</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruhe</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kroll</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morhenn</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weigel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Microbial hub taxa link host and abiotic factors to plant microbiome variation.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Biol.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e1002352</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.1002352</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26788878</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berendsen</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>P. A. H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>486</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22564542</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berendsen</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vismans</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Jonge</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burgman</surname> <given-names>W. P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>1496</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1507</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-018-0093-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29520025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koeberl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rybakova</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grosch</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smalla</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plant microbial diversity is suggested as the key to future biocontrol and health trends.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>93</volume>:<fpage>fix050</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fix050</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28430944</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuczynski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stombaugh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bittinger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bushman</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costello</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Methods</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.f.303</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20383131</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carrion</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perez-Jaramillo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cordovez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tracanna</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Hollander</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruiz-Buck</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>366</volume>:<fpage>606</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaw9285</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31672892</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waghmode</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuramae</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Root-associated microbiomes of wheat under the combined effect of plant development and nitrogen fertilization.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>136</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0750-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31640813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deketelaere</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyvaert</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franca</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hofte</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Desirable traits of a good biocontrol agent against verticillium wilt.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>1186</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.01186</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28729855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erdogan</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benlioglu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Biological control of Verticillium wilt on cotton by the use of fluorescent <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. under field conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Control</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.11.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Green fluorescent protein-tagged bacillus axarquiensis TUBP1 reduced cotton verticillium wilt incidence by altering soil rhizosphere microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>3562</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3576</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-021-02618-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34347145</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsui</surname> <given-names>C. K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Disease-induced changes in plant microbiome assembly and functional adaptation.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-021-01138-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34526096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Lama Caban&#x00E1;s</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schiliro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valverde-Corredor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mercado-Blanco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The biocontrol endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 induces systemic defense responses in aerial tissues upon colonization of olive roots.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>427</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00427</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25250017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive genomic analysis of Bacillus subtilis 9407 reveals its biocontrol potential against bacterial fruit blotch.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathol. Res.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>4</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s42483-021-00081-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Network analysis infers the wilt pathogen invasion associated with non-detrimental bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>8</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41522-020-0117-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32060424</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huws</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scollan</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Specificity and sensitivity of eubacterial primers utilized for molecular profiling of bacteria within complex microbial ecosystems.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Microbiol. Methods</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>569</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17683816</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jack</surname> <given-names>A. L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A seed-recruited microbiome protects developing seedlings from disease by altering homing responses of <italic>Pythium aphanidermatum zoospores</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>422</volume> <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeon</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomashow</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weller</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Glutamic acid reshapes the plant microbiota to protect plants against pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>244</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-021-01186-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34930485</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kusstatscher</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zachow</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harms</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eigner</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microbiome-driven identification of microbial indicators for postharvest diseases of sugar beets.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>112</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0728-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31391094</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rhizoshere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>36</volume>:<fpage>1100</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.4232</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30295674</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Disruption of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria abundance in tomato rhizosphere causes the incidence of bacterial wilt disease.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>330</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-00785-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33028974</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Antagonist Bacillus subtilis HJ5 controls Verticillium wilt of cotton by root colonization and biofilm formation.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Fert. Soils</italic></source> <volume>49</volume> <fpage>295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>303</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-012-0718-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A simplified synthetic community rescues Astragalus mongholicus from root rot disease by activating plant-induced systemic resistance.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>217</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-021-01169-9</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34732249</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carvalhais</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Percy</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prakash Verma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schenk</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Evidence for the plant recruitment of beneficial microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>229</volume> <fpage>2873</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2885</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17057</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33131088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yalimaimaiti</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive genomic analysis of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> AL7 reveals its biocontrol potential against <italic>Verticillium</italic> wilt of cotton.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Genet. Genomics</italic></source> <volume>296</volume> <fpage>1287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1298</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00438-021-01816-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34553246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Engineering banana endosphere microbiome to improve Fusarium wilt resistance in banana.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>74</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0690-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31092296</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Magoc</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>2957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2963</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21903629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulson</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>114</volume> <fpage>E2450</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E2459</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1616148114</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28275097</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parks</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyson</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hugenholtz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beiko</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>3123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25061070</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prieto</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Navarro-Raya</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valverde-Corredor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amyotte</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dobinson</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mercado-Blanco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Colonization process of olive tissues by <italic>Verticillium Dahliae</italic> and its in planta interaction with the biocontrol root endophyte <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> fluorescens PICF7.</article-title> <source><italic>Microb. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume> <fpage>499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00105.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21255281</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The variation in the rhizosphere microbiome of cotton with soil type, genotype and developmental stage.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>3940</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-04213-7</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28638057</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quast</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pruesse</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yilmaz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schweer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yarza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>D590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D596</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1219</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23193283</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ritpitakphong</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falquet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vimoltust</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Metraux</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x2019;Haridon</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>210</volume> <fpage>1033</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1043</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13808</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26725246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCarthy</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smyth</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19910308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rudrappa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Czymmek</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pare</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bais</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Root-Secreted Malic Acid Recruits Beneficial Soil Bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>148</volume> <fpage>1547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1556</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.108.127613</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18820082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shannon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Markiel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozier</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baliga</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramage</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Res.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>2498</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2504</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.1239303</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14597658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hesselberg-Thomsen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bacillus velezensis stimulates resident rhizosphere <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> stutzeri for plant health through metabolic interactions.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>774</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>787</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-021-01125-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34593997</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> populations to enhance plant disease suppression.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>137</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00892-z</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32962766</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title><italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species isolated via high-throughput screening significantly protect cotton plants against verticillium wilt.</article-title> <source><italic>Amb. Express</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>193</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13568-020-01132-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33118043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Networking in the Plant Microbiome.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Biol.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>e1002378</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pbio.1002378</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26871440</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vandenkoornhuyse</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quaiser</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duhamel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Van</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dufresne</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>206</volume> <fpage>1196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13312</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25655016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wagg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlaeppi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuramae</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>4841</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31649246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jousset</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Phage combination therapies for bacterial wilt disease in tomato.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume>:<fpage>1513</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0328-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31792408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weller</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gardener</surname> <given-names>B. B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomashow</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.030402.110010</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12147763</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>metaX: a flexible and comprehensive software for processing metabolomics data.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>183</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12859-017-1579-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28327092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Enrichment of beneficial cucumber rhizosphere microbes mediated by organic acid secretion.</article-title> <source><italic>Hortic. Res.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>154</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-020-00380-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33082961</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Molecular cloning and characterization of GhERF105, a gene contributing to the regulation of gland formation in upland cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L.).</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>102</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-021-02846-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33602142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>229</volume> <fpage>1091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1104</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Complete genome sequence of sphingobacterium psychroaquaticum strain SJ-25, an aerobic bacterium capable of suppressing fungal pathogens.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-019-01789-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31646352</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Isolation and evaluation of rhizosphere actinomycetes with potential application for biocontrol of Verticillium wilt of cotton.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>J. M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlatter</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagerty</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hulbert</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulitz</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere community selection reveals bacteria associated with reduced root disease.</article-title> <source><italic>Microbiome</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>86</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00997-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33836842</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penton</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomashow</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Predicting disease occurrence with high accuracy based on soil macroecological patterns of Fusarium wilt.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>2936</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2950</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-0720-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32681158</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zgadzaj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrido-Oter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koprivova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulze-Lefert</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radutoiu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root nodule symbiosis in Lotus japonicus drives the establishment of distinctive rhizosphere, root, and nodule bacterial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>113</volume> <fpage>E7996</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E8005</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1616564113</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27864511</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Screening and characterization of endophytic Bacillus for biocontrol of grapevine downy mildew.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2017.02.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Composition and characteristics of soil microbial communities in cotton fields with different incidences of <italic>Verticillium wilt</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Signal. Behav.</italic></source> <comment>[Epub ahead of print]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15592324.2022.2034271</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35175867</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Tomato Endophytic Bacteria Composition and Mechanism of Suppressiveness of Wilt Disease (<italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>731764</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.731764</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34721330</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>In silico and genetic analyses of cyclic lipopeptide synthetic gene clusters in <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. 11K1.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>544</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00544</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30941113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Metabolomics reveals that engineered nanomaterial exposure in soil alters both soil rhizosphere metabolite profiles and maize metabolic pathways.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>1716</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1727</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/C9EN00137A</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Synthetic community with six <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains screened from garlic rhizosphere microbiome promotes plant growth.</article-title> <source><italic>Microb. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>488</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>502</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.13640</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32762153</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cloud.oebiotech.cn">https://cloud.oebiotech.cn</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote2">
<label>2</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/">http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote3">
<label>3</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.kegg.jp">http://www.kegg.jp</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote4">
<label>4</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/">http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>