<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.987241</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Enhancing egg production and quality by the supplementation of probiotic strains (<italic>Clostridium</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic>) <italic>via</italic> improved amino acid digestibility, intestinal health, immune response, and antioxidant activity</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Obianwuna</surname> <given-names>Uchechukwu Edna</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1353015/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Kai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1068123/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>Xin-yu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Hai-jun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1100853/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Jing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/655821/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Guang-hai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/654833/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Tie-hu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Yong-bo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Shu-geng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1351520/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Institute of Feed Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>China Oil Foodstuffs Corporation (COFCO) Nutrition and Health Research Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Technology Department, China Oil Foodstuffs Corporation (COFCO) (Beijing) Feed Technology Company Limited</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Wen-Chao Liu, Guangdong Ocean University, China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Shimeng Huang, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China; Mohammad Goli, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Tie-hu Sun, <email>suntiehu@cofco.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Shu-geng Wu, <email>wushugeng@caas.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Systems Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>987241</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>06</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Obianwuna, Qiu, Chang, Zhang, Wang, Qi, Sun, Su and Wu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Obianwuna, Qiu, Chang, Zhang, Wang, Qi, Sun, Su and Wu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study focused on evaluating the influence of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> strains on egg production, egg quality, immune response and antioxidant function, apparent fecal amino acid digestibility, and jejunal morphology when supplemented as probiotics in the diets of laying hens in the peak phase. A total of 288 healthy 30-week-old Hy-Line Brown laying hens were arbitrarily assigned to four dietary groups, which included control diet and control diet supplemented with 0.02% <italic>C. butyricum</italic> zlc-17, <italic>C. butyricum</italic> lwc-13, or <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> zlb-z1, for 84 days. The results showed that dietary <italic>C. butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. exerted a positively significant influence (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) compared to the control group on the performance, egg quality, and physiological response of the birds. The diets could reduce mortality rate and enhance (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) egg weight and egg mass, egg production rate, and feed efficiency. Further analysis suggested that the probiotic strains can enhance (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) eggshell quality, Haugh unit, thick albumen content, and albumen height. Also, probiotics enhanced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) the antioxidant status <italic>via</italic> increased antioxidant enzymes and jejunal morphology as evidenced by increased villi surface area (VSA), the ratio of villi height to crypt depth, villi width, and villi height, and a significant reduction in crypt depth. Besides, nutrient absorption and retention were enhanced, as apparent fecal amino acid digestibility of key essential amino acids was substantially improved in the diet-based group. The concentrations of immunoglobulin M and A (IgM and IgA) increased significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) in the probiotics group and the same effect was notable for complement proteins (C3) and immune organ (Spleen). Conclusively, the supplementation of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> zlc-17 in comparison to <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> lwc-13 and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> zlb-z1 strains significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) promoted the antioxidant status, modulated the intestinal structure, enhanced amino acid digestibility, and regulated the immunity index of the laying hens, which finally improves the laying performance and egg quality of the laying hens.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>probiotics</kwd>
<kwd>laying hens</kwd>
<kwd>egg quality</kwd>
<kwd>gut health</kwd>
<kwd>immune response</kwd>
<kwd>antioxidant capacity</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">National Key Research and Development Program of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012166</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="84"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="13079"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Feed additives are often employed in poultry nutrition to enhance the health status of the birds, growth performance, and efficiency of production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Markowiak and &#x015A;li&#x017C;ewska, 2018</xref>). The utilization of synthetic antibiotics as feed additives in animal production is targeted mainly toward gut health; this appears beneficial, but such may not be the case in laying hen&#x2019;s production due to issues related to egg safety. Also, the abrogation of antibiotic uses in animal diets according to European Parliament and Council Regulation EC No. 1831/2003 due to its adverse effects, such as drug resistance, residue effect, and environmental pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al., 2015</xref>), lends more evidence to its non-use in animal production despite its beneficial effect on animal health. To this end, other countries including China, the United States, and South Korea have also adopted antibiotic-free diets in animal production. In order to maintain an equilibrium between egg safety for consumers and animal health, feed additives, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and organic acid, which tend to stimulate favorable growth and immune function in farm animals without adverse effects on animal product quality, have been advocated for <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Al-Khalaifah (2018)</xref>.</p>
<p>Probiotics are often considered as &#x201C;Live&#x201D; micro-organisms, which when supplied in a substantial amount, provide the host with an improved health and welfare status (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization Expert Consultation, 2001</xref>). The underlying mechanism of probiotic actions, including the production of metabolites (short-chain organic fatty acids), immunostimulatory effects, alteration of gastrointestinal flora, and exclusive competitive binding to receptors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Sherman et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahasan et al., 2015</xref>), accounts for the myriad of its positive influence on animal production and health in the poultry industry. Probiotics have been found to enhance laying performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mikulski et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Macit et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xu et al., 2022</xref>), egg quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Deng et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Wang J. et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Ray et al., 2022</xref>), immune response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Song et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Deng et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pan et al., 2022</xref>), gut health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdel-Latif et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>), and reduced oxidative stress response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Deng et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xu et al., 2022</xref>). Nevertheless, some studies reported that probiotics had no influence on egg production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Arp&#x00E1;&#x0161;ov&#x00E1; et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Shi et al., 2020</xref>), egg quality: albumen quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Souza et al., 2021</xref>) and eggshell quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>), and antioxidant capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Forte et al., 2016</xref>). The probiotic strain used in the diet may be a contributory factor to the non-significant effect. Studies demonstrated that probiotics could be supplemented in the diet of laying hens as a single strain or a combination of different strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>). In the poultry industry, microorganisms often used as probiotics include colonizing species of <italic>Enterococcus. Streptococcus, Bacillus, Lactobacillus</italic>, and <italic>Clostridium</italic>.</p>
<p><italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> (CB) spores are highly stable anaerobic endospore-forming gram-positive bacteria, with a capacity to withstand higher temperatures and bile concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kong et al., 2011</xref>); thus, they might be utilized in the diet of laying hens as safe feed additives. Previous pieces of literature showed that supplementation of CB in the diet of laying hens at different levels, 0.5 g/kg (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>), 0.9 g/kg (Wang et al., 2020), 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/kg (Wang et al., 2021), and 5 &#x00D7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>), exerted no negative effect, which lends more evidence of CB as safe feed additives. Our preliminary studies also revealed that CB could be supplemented at 0.02%. In previous research, the positive influence of CB on egg production and egg quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>) has been reported. Furthermore, <italic>C. butyricum</italic> can positively influence intestinal morphology and health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Zhang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>), probably because it can act as a source of nutrients for intestinal epithelium and modulate intestinal microflora and intestinal pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Meimandipour et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Takahashi et al., 2018</xref>). Also, <italic>C. butyricum</italic> possesses the potential to improve antioxidant capacity and immune function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>) and nutrient absorption and utilization <italic>via</italic> the stimulation of enzymes and nutrient transporters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, the potential of CB to modulate gut health, antioxidant, and immune function may account for its beneficial influence on laying performance and egg quality. However, the <italic>C. butyricum</italic> species used in this study may differ from previous ones, where probably these species were reconstituted and designed to be more suitable for the peak phase of laying hens. In the same line, <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains are stable in an acidic gut environment, form biofilm in the small intestine, could be delivered in the form of spores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Jeong and Kim, 2014</xref>), and thus could be used as feed additives. The <italic>Bacillus</italic> spores were previously adopted as a feed additive to increase egg production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mazanko et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>) and albumen quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Wei et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Darsi and Zhaghari, 2021</xref>). The potential of <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. to enhance nutrient utilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Souza et al., 2021</xref>), intestine morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Wang J. et al., 2021</xref>), and serum antioxidant capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>) has also been demonstrated. Thus, <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains can be supplemented in the diets of laying hens because of the potential to maintain the physiological status of the animals, which could translate to improved laying performance and egg quality. Furthermore, strains of <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> are producers of antibacterial and antifungal agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Panda et al., 2014</xref>) and, hence, can be used for biological control. Previous reports showed that <italic>Brevibacillus brevis</italic> (FJAT-1501-BPA) can suppress the abundance of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus, E. Coli</italic> K88, and <italic>Salmonella typhimurium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ge et al., 2009</xref>) while <italic>Brevibacillus laterosporus texasporus</italic> enhanced the intestine health of broiler birds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Purba et al., 2020</xref>), suggesting that the strain has the potential to be used as a probiotic in animal feeding. However, there exists a dearth of information on the utilization of <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. in the diet of laying hens.</p>
<p>There are several studies on <italic>Clostridium</italic> sp. in laying hens, but the strains used in this study are newly created and designed specifically for peak-laying hens; moreover, studies on the effects of <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on egg production rate, egg quality, physiological status, and intestinal morphometric of laying hens rarely exist. Therefore, the current study investigated the dietary influence of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus spores</italic> on egg quality, laying performance, amino acid digestibility, immune response, intestinal morphology, and antioxidant function in Hy-Line Brown laying hens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The Animal Ethics and Use Committee of the Feed Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China consented to all protocols utilized in the current study with the animal ethics approval number CAAS. No.: 20200507S0600103.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>Hy-Line Brown laying hens (<italic>n</italic> = 288, 30-week old) at the peak-laying phase (initial egg production rate = 89.0 &#x00B1; 1.5%) with similar laying rates were arbitrarily assigned to one of four dietary groups, each of which consists of six replicates (<italic>n</italic> = 72 laying hens). The feeding trial included a 12-week test phase and a 2-week acclimation or a feed transfer period (lasted for 14 weeks; 30&#x2013;44 weeks of age). On a daily basis, the laying hens were offered fresh water and feed <italic>ad lib</italic>, the birds were given routine vaccination, and management was based on the Hy-line International Online Management Guide. Throughout the feeding trial period, the laying hens were managed under a controlled house environment (on a daily basis): humidity (50&#x2013;80%) and 16 h of light and temperature (24<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C). During the feeding trial, the laying hens had stable good health as there was no disease outbreak, and invariably, no medications were offered.</p>
<p>The diet groups consist of the control diet without supplementation of probiotics, basal diet + 0.02% of <italic>C. butyricum</italic> (zlc-17), basal diet + 0.02% of <italic>C. butyricum</italic> (lwc-17), and basal diet + 0.02% of <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> (zlb-z1). The viable count of three kinds of probiotic products is the same, i.e., 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> CFU/g. Prior to the feeding trial, the birds were fed laying hens&#x2019; diets; a basal diet of mashed corn and soybean. This diet was sufficient in all nutrients and met the necessary standards. The information regarding basal diet, nutrient level, and nutrient composition, is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, and the diet was in accordance with the nutrient formulation guide of the National Research Council (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">National Research and Council, 1994</xref>). The probiotics were purchased from COFCO Nutrition and Health Research Institute, Beijing, China.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>The Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ingredients</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Content(%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soybean meal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stone powder</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DL-methionine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dicalcium phosphate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Salt</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Premix (choline chloride)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sodium sulfate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phytase</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nutrient content</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>%</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Crude protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Calcium</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total phosphorus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available phosphorus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID methionine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.434</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID lysine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.796</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID tryptophan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.176</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID threonine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.560</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID methionine + cysteine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.653</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID isoleucine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.666</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID cysteine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID valine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.746</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID arginine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID leucine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.414</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID serine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.776</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SID glycine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.616</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>The values are calculated values. AME, apparent metabolizable energy. SID, Standard ileal digestibility; Met + Cys, Methionine + Cysteine. 2 Vitamin and mineral premix provided the following per kg of diets: VA: 12,500 IU; VD3: 4,125 IU; VE: 15 IU; VK: 2 mg; VB1: 1 mg; VB2: 8.5 mg; VB6: 8 mg; VB12: 5 mg; calcium pantothenate: 50 mg; niacin: 32.5 mg; biotin: 2 mg; folic acid: 5 mg; choline: 500 mg; Mn: 65 mg; I: 1 mg; Fe: 60 mg; Cu: 8 mg; Zn: 66 mg.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Performance measurement</title>
<p>During the feeding experiment, which lasted for 12 weeks, the following records were taken per replicate on a daily basis, egg number, egg weight, damaged eggs, and mortality rate, and data collection on feed intake was done on a fortnight basis. Based on the collected data, the following calculations were deduced; hen day production (HDP), feed conversion ratio (FCR), average feed intake (ADFI), average egg weight (AEG), and egg mass for the whole trial period (&#x03C0; &#x00D7; VW &#x00D7; VH).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Sample collection and laboratory analysis of blood</title>
<p>After the feeding trial (12 weeks), 24 birds (six from each group, one per replicate) were separated and kept in other cages and subjected to a 12-h fast prior to slaughter. About 5 mL of blood was drawn from the wing vein for the measurement of whole blood and serum indices. The blood samples collected in a micro-anticoagulant tube were kept slant at a fixed point for a period of 30 min and then centrifuged (300 &#x00D7; g for 15 min) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Tang et al., 2018</xref>). The obtained serum was transferred to Eppendorf tubes (1.5 mL) and kept at a low temperature (&#x2212;20<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C). The blood samples were transported to the laboratory in an ice pack within 1 h of collection for hematology analysis.</p>
<p>An automated hematological analyzer (Model: BC-2800 Vet, Mindray, Shenzhen, China) was used for the hematological analysis. Prior to serum indices analysis, the serum was thawed and maintained at a low temperature (4<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C) to prevent enzyme activation. The concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), total superoxidase dismutase (T-SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in the serum were analyzed with the corresponding ELISA kits (A003-1, ml023160, A007-1-1, ml063644, A001-1-1, and ml061730) and spectrophotometrically measured (Shimadzu, model UV-1800, Tokyo, Japan). ML Bio and Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) were sources of the ELISA kits. Concentrations of CAT, T-SOD, and T-AOC were expressed in micromoles per milliliter, GST and GSH-Px as nanograms per milliliter, and MDA as nanomoles per milliliter of serum. Serum concentrations of immunoglobulins, such as IgM, IgA, and IgG, and complement proteins C3 and C4 were determined with the appropriate ELISA kits (WLB-09120, WLB-091301, WLB-050501, E032-1-1, and E033-1-1), respectively, and measured with a microplate reader. The instructions of the manufacturers were stringently followed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Intestine sample collection and jejunal morphology analysis</title>
<p>The birds were euthanized with pentobarbital sodium (100 mg/kg BW) intravenously and cut open while maintaining aseptic conditions. For each bird, the organs (magnum, heart, spleen, and liver) were separated and weighed immediately. The weights were expressed as a percentage of their body weight. For each bird, the small intestine samples were processed following an established procedure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gungor and Erener, 2020</xref>). About 3 cm of jejunum were removed and flushed in saline solution to eliminate feed contents, then were immersed in 10% buffered formalin, and were kept under low temperature (4<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C) for histology analysis. The jejunal tissue sections were embedded in paraffin blocks, and a 6-&#x03BC;m thickness of the tissue was subsequently cut, carefully placed on microscopic glass slides, and stained with a solution of hematoxylin and eosin. For slide examination, a microscope (Olympus BX43 microscope; Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was employed. To examine the jejunal morphology, 10 intact villi of each selected sample were measured, and the corresponding crypts were selected for measurement and an average value was obtained. The Villi height (VH) was obtained based on the measurement from the tip to the villus-crypt junction of each villus; the villus width (VW) was measured at the middle point of the villus; and crypt depth (CD) was obtained from the basement membrane up to the crypt&#x2013;villus transition region with the aid of a software (Caseviewer Image). Also, the equation (&#x03C0; &#x00D7; VW &#x00D7; VH) was used to deduce the villi surface area (VSA), while (V/C) was used to obtain the ratio of villi height and crypt depth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Wang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Thiam et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>Egg quality measurement</title>
<p>Following the end of 4, 8, and 12 weeks (a 4-week interval), three eggs per replicate (18 eggs) with a weight close to the range of that replicate were retrieved from each dietary group. The collected eggs were kept under room temperature, and egg quality was determined within 24 h of collection. Upon breakage of each egg, the albumen and the yolk were separated with the aid of an egg separator, and the weight of each was recorded. To measure the thick and thin albumen fractions, the weighed albumen was placed in a 60-mesh sieve at a time bound of 30 s, the thick portion of the albumen was glued to the sieve while the thin portion passed through the sieve as filtrate, and the corresponding weight of each fraction was recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Zhou et al., 2021</xref>). The eggshells were cleaned to remove any albumen fragments and then naturally dried for 48 h, and the weight was obtained. The proportion of the shell, the yolk, and the albumen relative to egg weight was expressed as shell or albumen or yolk weight/egg weight &#x00D7; 100 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Sarlak et al., 2021</xref>). The assessment of egg quality parameters, albumen height, Haugh Unit, and yolk color, was performed with an automatic egg analyzer (ORKA Food Technology Ltd., Ramat HaSharon, Israel). The eggshell breaking strength and eggshell thickness, which is expressed as an average measurement of three points (air cell, equator, and sharp end) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Mwaniki et al., 2018</xref>), were examined, respectively, with Egg Force Reader and Eggshell Thickness Gauge (ESTG-1, ORKA Technology Ltd., Ramat HaSharon, Israel).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS7">
<title>Apparent fecal amino acid digestibility</title>
<p>At the end of the experiment (12th week), on a replicate basis, three birds were selected and kept in a cage fitted with a tray for the collection of fecal samples, and this lasted for 3 days. The fecal sample collection was done at an interval of 12 h, and the samples were kept at &#x2212;20<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C in tight-closed bags. At the point of collection, it was ensured that all external components, such as feed, feathers, and any other substances, were thoroughly removed from the samples to avoid contamination. The collected feces samples were thawed, weighed, and oven dried for 72 h at 65<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C, after which it was broken and pulverized into a fine powder that can be sieved through a 0.05 mm mesh. For each metabolic cage, the feed intake and feces weight (dry matter basis) were recorded and used to determine the apparent fecal amino acid digestibility. The feed and fecal samples were further processed for amino acid analysis with HPLC while adopting the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Varzaru et al. (2013)</xref>. The apparent fecal amino acid digestibility coefficient was computed; 1 &#x2212; (amino acid concentration in feces &#x00D7; feces weight) &#x00F7; (amino acid concentration in feed &#x00D7; feed intake) &#x00D7; 100%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS8">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The experiment consists of four groups with six replications, each in a completely randomized design to ensure random allocation of birds to treatments. All the data generated in this study were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), which ensures that there is no biasness with respect to data normality and equality of variance assumptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Nwachukwu et al., 2021</xref>). Replicates were used as experimental units, and the data were presented as mean and pooled SEM, while the level of significance was considered at a <italic>p</italic>-value &#x003C; 0.05. Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test was employed for <italic>post hoc</italic> comparison to ascertain the variations among the treatment groups. The statistical package used was SPSS software, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, II, United States) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Wang L. et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Laying performance</title>
<p>At 4-week intervals throughout the trial, the production performance indices (egg weight, egg mass, hen-day production, mortality and damaged egg rates, feed intake, and feed conversion) were analyzed for all groups. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> presents the outcomes.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the performance of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 1&#x2013;4</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AEW (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Egg mass (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.30<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.71<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HDP%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.12<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.49<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.93<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Damaged eggs(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.150</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortality(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.410</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">116.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">120.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">118.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.610</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FCR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.271</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 5&#x2013;8</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AEG (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.84<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.83<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Egg mass (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.98<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.82<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HDP(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.34<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.34<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Damaged eggs(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortality(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">112.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">114.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">113.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">115.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.810</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FCR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.97<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.90<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 9&#x2013;12</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AEG (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.98<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.53<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Egg mass (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.85<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.26<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HDP%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.76<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.96<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Damaged eggs(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortality(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.410</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">121.17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">129.68<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">126.98<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">128.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FCR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.801</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 1&#x2013;12</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AEG (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Egg mass (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.04<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.38<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.55<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HDP%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.73<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.26<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Damaged eggs (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mortality(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.089</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">116.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">121.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">120.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.219</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FCR</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.07<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.098</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean. Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t2fna"><p><sup>a,b,c</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Egg weight was not influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) by diets at the end of 4 weeks, but CB-z improved egg weight (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) at weeks 8 and 12, while egg weights for other groups did not vary (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) with control. Egg mass was increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) by dietary CB-z compared to control and other treatment groups at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Furthermore, at all sampling points, egg mass from the CB group had the highest value, while that of the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group was not significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) from the control. A significant increase (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) in egg production rate due to dietary treatments was observed throughout the feeding period. The egg production rate of the CB-z group was 4.7% higher (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) and varied from control and other treatment groups, while the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group had the lowest egg production rate among the treatment groups throughout the feeding trial. The egg production rate of the CB-l and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> groups was not significant (<italic>P</italic>&#x2265; 0.05) from control at all measuring points but numerically higher. Zero mortality rate was noticed in the probiotic-based groups but not in the control group, and damaged eggs were not influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) by diets throughout the study period. Dietary influence on feed intake was not significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) at weeks 4 and 8 but was significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) at week 12. However, there was no variation (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) among the probiotic-based group. The FCR was enhanced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) due to dietary influence at weeks 8 and 1&#x2013;12 but not at other measuring points. Among the probiotic-based groups, the CB-z group recorded the lowest value, while no variation (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) between control and other treatments was found.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Egg quality assessment</title>
<p>The results of egg quality determination are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. The relative weight of the albumen and the yolk differed statistically (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) between the control group and the dietary group throughout the feeding period, while the relative shell weight was only significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) at week 4 but not at other measuring points. The relative albumen weight consistently increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) due to the treatment effect at all measuring points, except week 4, while the relative yolk weight of the control group increased significantly compared to other treatments throughout the study. There was no variation (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) in relative albumen weight among the dietary groups during week 12, but the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group recorded the least and highest weight at weeks 4 and 12, respectively. Eggshell thickness was improved (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) by dietary probiotics at weeks 4 and 8, but no variation (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) was found at week 12. Eggshell strength and yolk color were not improved (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) by dietary treatments at weeks 4 and 8 but improved (&#x2264; 0.05) by week 12. Eggshell strength did not vary (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) among the probiotic-based groups, while only the CB group differed from the control for yolk color. Haugh unit and albumen height were not influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) by dietary probiotics at the end of week 4, but significant improvements (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) due to treatment effect were notable at the end of weeks 8 and 12. The Haugh unit and the albumen height of the probiotic-based groups were consistently higher (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) compared to the control. Among treatments, no significant variation (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) in the albumen height was found at the end of week 8, but the CB group was greater (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) than the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group at the end of week 12. Similarly, at the end of weeks 8 and 12, no statistical differences (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) were found for the Haugh unit among the treatment groups. Thick-to-thin albumen ratio was consistently significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) throughout the entire experiment. At the end of weeks 4 and 8, only the CB-z group and the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group were, respectively, significant (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) from the control, while all the treatment groups were significant from control at week 12, and no observable variations (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) among treatments were found.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the egg quality of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 4</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative albumen weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.58<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.98<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.47<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative yolk weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.48<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.30<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.77<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative shell weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.83<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.81<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.17<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shell thickness (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.59<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.70<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.49<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shell strength, (<italic>N</italic>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.540</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yolk color</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.960</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Albumen height (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.93<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.33<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Haugh units</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.27<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thick to thin albumen ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.87<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 8</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative albumen weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.58<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.06<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative yolk weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.61<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.31<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative shell weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.770</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shell thickness (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.42<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.07<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.46<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shell strength, <italic>N</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.260</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yolk color</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.540</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Albumen height (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Haugh units</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.620</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thick to thin albumen ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.36<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Week 12</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative albumen weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.24<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.74<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative yolk weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.48<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.56<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.32<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Relative shell weight(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.932</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shell thickness (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.235</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shell strength, <italic>N</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.97<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Yolk color</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Albumen height (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.92<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.90<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Haugh units</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.36<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thick to thin albumen ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.43<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t3fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean. Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t3fna"><p><sup>a,b,c</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Hematological and serum biochemical profiles</title>
<p>The hematological indices of laying hens fed dietary <italic>C. butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>. The blood indices such as WBC, MCV, MCH, PLT, heterophils, neutrophils, and H/L were influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) by treatments, while other indices such as eosinophils, RBC, Hb, monocytes, PCV, and MCHC were not affected (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) by diets. Also, WBC count, heterophils, and lymphocytes were not significantly different (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) among the treatment groups. Only birds in the CB-z group recorded a lower H/L ratio among the supplemented groups with a level of significance (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) compared to the control group.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the hematological indices of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">WBC (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.10<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.51<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RBC (&#x00D7; 10<sup>12</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.829</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hb (g/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.837</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PCV (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.991</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MCV (fL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">155.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">151.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">156.11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">157.42<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MCH (Pg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.28<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.36<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.77<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MCHC (g/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">203.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">199.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">213.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">208.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.164</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Platelets (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.70<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.088</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Heterophil (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.24<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.69<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.90<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.056</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lymphocytes (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.18<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.78<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.51<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.086</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H/L</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.36<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Monocyte (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.202</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Eosinophil (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.332</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Basophil (&#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup>/L)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.28<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t4fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.094</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean; WBC, white blood cells count; RBC, red blood cells count; Hb, hemoglobin count; PCV, packed cell volume; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; H/L, heterophil/lymphocyte.</p></fn>
<fn><p>Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t4fna"><p><sup>a,b,c</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The influence of dietary <italic>C</italic>. <italic>butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> on the serum index, immunity and oxidant and antioxidant parameters, of laying hens is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>. Serum MDA was significantly higher (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) in the control than in the treatment group, whereas the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group recorded the lowest concentration of the MDA content in the serum. The concentrations of the antioxidant enzymes T-SOD, GST, GSH-Px, and CAT were increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) due to dietary treatments, whereas T-AOC was not influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) by the diets. The concentrations of serum IgM and IgA were influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) by diets, but no variations (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) in IgG due to the dietary treatment were observed. The <italic>C. butyricum</italic> group had the highest immunoglobulin concentrations compared to the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group. Dietary treatments influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) complement protein C3 (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) but not C4.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the serum antioxidant and immune capacity of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MDA (nmol/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CAT (U/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.67<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.34<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.83<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T-SOD (U/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">107.41<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">143.81<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">114.76<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">130.22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T-AOC (U/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.370</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GSH-Px (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.53<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.45<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GST (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.93<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.32<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.52<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IgG (&#x03BC;g/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.486</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IgM (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2335.50<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3325.00<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3343.33<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2372.50<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">581.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IgA (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4762.78<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6104.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5990.55<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5512.83<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">241.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C3 (mg/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.073<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.085<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.088<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.075<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t5fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C4 (mg/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.045</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.046</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.432</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean. MDA-malondialdehyde, CAT-catalase, T-SOD- total superoxide dismutase, T-AOC-total antioxidant capacity, GSH-Px-glutathione peroxidase, GST-glutathione transferase, IgG-immunoglobulin G, IgM- immunoglobulin M, IgA- immunoglobulin A, C3 and C4-complement proteins. Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t5fna"><p><sup>a,b,c</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), SEM: standard error of mean.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Apparent fecal amino acid digestibility</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref> presents data on the apparent fecal amino acid digestibility of laying hens fed probiotics-based diets. There was a significant improvement (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) in the digestibility of essential amino acids (isoleucine, valine, leucine, methionine, histidine lysine, and phenylalanine) and non-essential amino acids (glycine, serine, methionine-cysteine, and tyrosine) and crude protein, due to influence of diets. Other amino acids including asparagine, threonine, glutamic acid, proline, alanine, cysteine, lysine, arginine, and tryptophan were not influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) by treatments. Among the diet group, the CB-z group had the highest value for digestibility of all amino acids. No variations (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) exist between the <italic>Clostridium groups</italic> for all amino acid digestibility coefficients, while the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group differed in methionine-cysteine and serine from the <italic>C. butyricum</italic> group.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T6">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the apparent fecal amino acid digestibility coefficient of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Apparent digestibility(%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Crude protein</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.20<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70.64<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Asparagine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Threonine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68,76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Serine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.24<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glutamic acid</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proline</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.185</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glycine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-3.14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.74<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Alanine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cysteine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Valine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.090</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Methionine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Met + Cys</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.28<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.57<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.093</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Isoleucine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.16<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.48<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.81<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.13<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.060</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leucine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.84<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.98<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tyrosine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.54<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.53<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82.59<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phenylalanine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.25<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.66<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.39<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.55<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histidine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.59<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">68.79<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lysine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.92<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t6fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.048</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Arginine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tryptophan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.665</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean; Met + cys, methionine cysteine. Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t6fna"><p><sup>a,b,c</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Relative organ weight and jejunal villi morphological structure</title>
<p>The organ weights of the magnum, the spleen, the heart, and the liver (expressed as relative weight) of laying hens were fed dietary <italic>C. butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic>, which are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref>. The relative weights of the magnum, the heart, and the liver were not statistically different (<italic>P</italic> &#x2265; 0.05) from the control, although the weight of the spleen was increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) due to dietary influence.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T7">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the organ index of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Magnum</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.352</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spleen</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t7fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.09<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t7fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t7fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t7fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Heart</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.790</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Liver</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.152</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean. Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t7fna"><p><sup>a,b</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The morphological characteristics of the jejunal villi of laying hens fed <italic>C. butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">Table 8</xref>. The villous indices (height, width, surface area), crypt depth, and villi height to crypt depth ratio were all influenced (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) by a probiotic-based diet. Villous height, width, surface area, and villi height to crypt depth were significantly increased (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05), whereas crypt depth was reduced in the treatment group compared to the control. All villi morphometrics differed (<italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) among the treatments. The CB-z group recorded the highest value for villous surface area, height, and width, while the <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> group had the least value for crypt depth and the highest value for villi height to crypt depth ratio.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T8">
<label>TABLE 8</label>
<caption><p>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. on the jejunal villi morphometry of laying hens.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-z</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CB-l</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BB-zl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">VH (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">938.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1347.65<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1186.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1294.05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">VW (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141.42<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>d</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">208.15<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">167.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">188.71<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CD (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">155.60<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">113.40<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>bc</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">123.80<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.83<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">VH:CD</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.35<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>ab</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.75<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.85<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">VSA (mmm<sup>3</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>d</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>a</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>c</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.77<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t8fna"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CB-z, Clostridium butyricum zlc-17; CB-l, Clostridium butyricum lwc-13; BB-zl, Brevibacillus zlb-z1; SEM, standard error of mean; VH-villi height, VW-villi width, CD-crypt depth, VH:CD, villi height to crypt depth ratio, VSA, villi surface area. Data represent the mean of six replicates of three hen each.</p></fn>
<fn id="t8fna"><p><sup>a,b,c,d</sup>Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), SEM, standard error of mean.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Eggs are very important to consumers due to their high nutrient and biological quality; therefore, feeding laying hens with diets supplemented with natural feed additives, such as probiotics, can provide results that are vital for the commercial laying hens industry. The spores of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> were used in the present study due to their stability in the gut and thus are regarded as safe use for poultry nutrition. Dietary supplementation with <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. had no negative impact on the laying hens throughout the feeding period. This lends evidence that the newly designed strains of <italic>C. butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> are suitable for peak-laying hens. They could also be used as a safe feed additive in the poultry industry as reported previously with other probiotic strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Wei et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ahmat et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">C&#x00E9;sar et al., 2022</xref>). There is a dearth of evidence on the influence of <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. in the diet of laying hens, and <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. would be used for comparison.</p>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Laying performance</title>
<p>Improvement in egg production rate and egg weight is of critical economic value to the poultry industry. Probiotics, including <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>) and <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp., <italic>B. velezensis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Wei et al., 2020</xref>), <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Guo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Darsi and Zhaghari, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Souza et al., 2021</xref>), and <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pan et al., 2022</xref>), were reported to enhance egg production in laying hens. Also, combined <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains caused an 8% improvement in laying performance compared to the control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>). The increased egg production rate could be due to an improvement in nutrient utilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Souza et al., 2021</xref>), which is accrued to a positive effect of probiotics on the beneficial gut microbial population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xu et al., 2022</xref>) and gut morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Song et al., 2019</xref>). In the current study, our findings revealed that <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> significantly improved egg production rates. The improvement could be adducible to better nutrient utilization orchestrated by a decrease in stress response, enhanced gut health, and improved immune function, as observed in this study. This claim is supported by previous studies in laying hens, which demonstrated that probiotic-induced improvement in physiological indices, including immunity index, intestinal morphology, and antioxidant capacity culminated in significantly increased laying performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Deng et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pan et al., 2022</xref>). However, some studies found no probiotic-induced effect on egg production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Shi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Wang J. et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Ray et al., 2022</xref>). The discrepancies may be due to the age of laying hens and probiotics composition and dosage. Enhanced laying performance often reflects egg mass output and egg weight. Our findings revealed a significant improvement in egg weight and egg mass in response to dietary probiotics, and this is in line with previous reports that probiotics exerted a beneficial effect on egg weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Ray et al., 2022</xref>). The improvement suggests that probiotics are natural growth enhancers through efficient nutrient utilization. Nevertheless, some studies reported a non-significant influence of probiotics on egg weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Darsi and Zhaghari, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Souza et al., 2021</xref>). Feed consumption (FI) and FCR are often used as indicators for feed utilization efficiency. In previous reports, probiotics including <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>), <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Neijat et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pan et al., 2022</xref>), and combined probiotics strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Ray et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Xu et al., 2022</xref>) enhanced feed efficiency in laying hens. Similarly, in this study, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> improved feed utilization, and consequently, the enhanced feed efficiency was a boost to the production potential of the animal. The improvement in feed efficiency may be the capacity of probiotics to enhance gut morphology and health <italic>via</italic> increased villi height for better nutrient absorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pan et al., 2022</xref>) and the production of bacteriocins and volatile bacteriostatic substances, which can suppress pathogen invasion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Chen et al., 2007</xref>). Conversely, there was no influence of probiotics on FCR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Upadhaya et al., 2019</xref>) and feed intake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Neijat et al., 2019</xref>). This may be due to the inclusion level of probiotics in the diets. Furthermore, in this study, the probiotic-based group recorded zero mortality rate relative to the control. In line with the current findings, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al. (2019)</xref> reported zero mortality rate in laying hens fed <italic>Clostridium butyricum.</italic> The zero-mortality observed in the diet group could be that continuous feeding of probiotics enhanced the health status of the birds as evidenced by gut integrity and better antioxidant and immune function. Conclusively, the improved egg weight, egg production rate, feed utilization efficiency, and egg mass are suggestive of the positive response of laying hens to dietary probiotics supplementation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Egg quality</title>
<p>Maintenance of external (shell quality) and internal (albumen and yolk) components of the egg is of utmost priority in the laying hen&#x2019;s industry, to gain consumers&#x2019; acceptance while meeting up with market demands. In the study, our findings showed improvement in eggshell thickness and eggshell strength in response to dietary probiotics. This corroborates the previous findings that supplementation of probiotics: <italic>B. subtilis</italic> PB6 in broiler breeder hens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Darsi and Zhaghari, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Souza et al., 2021</xref>), <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Guo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fathi et al., 2018</xref>), and BLCC1-0238 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Upadhaya et al., 2019</xref>) in laying hens improved eggshell thickness. Also, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> exerted a beneficial effect on eggshell thickness and eggshell strength (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>). Probiotics have been found to enhance the growth of beneficial bacteria, and the proliferation of these microbes enhances the fermentation rate, which culminates in the accumulation of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and a reduction in luminal pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Forte et al., 2016</xref>). Also, the SCFAs enhance the growth and nourishment of intestinal villi structures for a better absorption rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Zou et al., 2019</xref>). Thus, improvement in eggshell quality could be linked to the capacity of probiotics to increase the assimilation and retention levels of calcium in the serum of laying birds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Attia et al., 2020</xref>), which would facilitate calcium deposition on the shell glands. Conversely, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al. (2020)</xref> demonstrated that <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> had no influence on eggshell thickness and strength, while B. <italic>subtilis</italic> had no effect on eggshell thickness but enhanced eggshell strength (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Upadhaya et al., 2019</xref>). These variations may be due to age and the laying phase of the hens. In addition, albumen quality is of great importance for the food processing and health industry, which utilizes the albumen as raw materials for further production of foods and drugs. Pieces of evidence demonstrated that <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Neijat et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>) and <italic>B. velezensis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Wei et al., 2020</xref>) improved HU and albumen height in broiler breeders and laying hens. In another study, <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains improved HU and the protein index in laying hens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mazanko et al., 2018</xref>). Also, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> was also found to enhance albumen height (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>) and albumen crude protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>). The improvement in albumen quality due to dietary probiotics effect may be accrued to enhanced nutrient digestibility, which would improve protein synthesis. It has been reported that probiotics stimulate the activities of digestive enzymes that cause a resultant increase in nutrient utilization and protein digestibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ahiwe et al., 2020</xref>). In the present study, we observed a similar distinct increase in albumen indices (albumen height, Haugh unit, and thick-to-thin albumen ratio) in response to dietary probiotics. The current study, to the best of our knowledge, would be the first to report the influence of probiotics on the thick-to-thin albumen ratio. The improvement in albumen quality may reflect an increase in protein synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lei et al., 2013</xref>). The enhanced HU values could be accrued to better bioavailability of nutrients and better gross digestible energy due to probiotics. Also, the capacity of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> to modulate the microflora composition in the body of an organism may have led to a beneficial effect on oviduct flora with consequent improvement in albumen synthesis. This claim is supported by the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Camarda et al. (2000)</xref>, which demonstrated that some pathogens may colonize the oviduct and impair its functions. The improvement in albumen quality indices suggests the production of high-quality eggs with better albumen viscoelasticity and shelf life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>). On the contrary, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> had no effect on albumen height, HU value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>), and HU value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>). The discrepancies may be related to the type of probiotics used. Probiotics including <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>) and <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Liu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>) improved yolk color in laying hens. The improvement in the yolk color may be accrued to the probiotic composition. In contrast, we observed no effect of diets on yolk color, similar to the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lei et al. (2013)</xref>, which revealed that the dietary influence of <italic>B. licheniformis</italic> on egg yolk color was not significant. The non-significant effect on yolk color could be a reflection that dietary probiotics do not play a key role in the metabolism of xanthophyll, which is a non-nutritive component. According to the aforementioned research findings, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> could be employed as secure feed additives in laying hen diets to enhance albumen and eggshell quality and two factors that are economically important and beneficial to the poultry sector.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Hematological indices, antioxidant capacity, and immune function</title>
<p>Farm animals are susceptible to oxidative stress, which often cause decreased immune function. Most often, blood parameters are used to investigate the level of stress in animals. In the present study, blood indices (WB, PLT, neutrophil, lymphocytes, basophils, H/L) were influenced by dietary probiotics. There are reports that <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> had no influence on blood WBC, RBC, or lymphocytes in laying hens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Shi et al., 2020</xref>) and broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Park et al., 2018</xref>). In this study, the decreased H/L ratio is similar to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">C&#x00E9;sar et al. (2022)</xref>, and the decreased H/L ratio could be due to the immunomodulatory effect of the dietary bioactive components that can also suppress pathogenic conditions in poultry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kogut and Klasing, 2009</xref>). The decrease in the H/L ratio due to dietary probiotics suggests that <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> could stabilize the health status of the laying hens. Therefore, the birds&#x2019; welfare can be improved under farm conditions, since probiotic supplementation in the diet of laying hens can be considered a dietary strategy for stress reduction in laying hens.</p>
<p>When there is a disequilibrium between the antioxidant system and reactive oxygen species (ROS) as output, oxidative stress becomes the norm, and the homeostatic balance of the animals is disrupted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Surai et al., 2019</xref>). Oxidative stress may impair reproductive performance because it induces the synthesis of ROS, which could disintegrate proteins and nucleic acid, and culminates in tissue damage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Pisoschi et al., 2021</xref>). There are pieces of evidence that probiotics could mask the negative effects of oxidative stress, enhance the activities of antioxidative enzymes and dietary CB; improved the activities of GSH-Px, CAT, and T-SOD with a concomitant decrease in the MDA content of the serum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>), reduced the MDA content in the intestine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>), improved serum antioxidant status but decreased T-AOC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang Y. et al., 2021</xref>) in laying hens. Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zhou et al. (2020)</xref> revealed that laying hens fed diets supplemented with <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> BLCC1-0238 had enhanced GSH-Px and GST activities but no effect was notable on the serum concentrations of the antioxidant system (CAT, T-AOC, T-SOD) and the MDA content. The increased antioxidant capacity could probably be due to the capacity of probiotics to increase the activities of antioxidant enzymes while the reduced T-AOC could be due to less occurrence of ROS in the body system. Our present findings revealed that <italic>C. butyricum and Brevibacillus</italic> enhanced the activities of GSH-Px, GST, CAT, and T-SOD and had no effect on T-AOC while reducing the MDA content. This lends evidence once again that probiotics including <italic>C. butyricum and Brevibacillus</italic> could modulate the antioxidant capacity of laying hens. An indication that the probiotics as feed additives could act as a boost to the antioxidant capacity of the host while lipid peroxidation activity is reduced. The enhanced antioxidant system may be due to the capacity of CB to synthesize butyrate and H2, which scavenge ROS and improve the activity of the antioxidative enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Jahns et al., 2015</xref>). The lack of probiotic-diet effect on T-AOC could be that the body may be insensitive to such probiotic-mediated responses. All together, these findings indicate that <italic>C. butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> could mitigate oxidative stress in laying hens through the stimulation of enzymatic components, which in turn supports better egg production rate and egg quality. An indication that these probiotics with antioxidant effects could be utilized in the laying industry as probiotic antioxidants.</p>
<p>The immunity index of animals is often measured based on the serum concentrations of immunoglobulins (IgM, IgA, and IgG) due to their key role in immune regulation and disease resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Mountzouris et al., 2010</xref>). Previous reports demonstrated that <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> significantly increased serum concentrations of IgG and IgA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ahmat et al., 2021</xref>) and the probiotic complex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Deng et al., 2021</xref>), and <italic>B. subtilis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Qiu et al., 2021</xref>) enhanced the serum immunoglobulins of IgG, IgA, and IgM in broiler birds. There are pieces of evidence that <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> increased IgG and IgA levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>) and CB enhanced IgA, IgY, and IgM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>) in laying hens. In a similar vein, our findings demonstrated that concentrations of the immunoglobulins (IgA and IgM) in the serum were significantly increased, while no effect was notable for IgG. Probiotics have been found to reduce the colonization of intestinal pathogens and stimulate the synthesis of natural antibodies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Haghighi et al., 2006</xref>). Thus, the improved immunoglobulin synthesis may be associated with the capacity of probiotics to exert immunomodulatory effects. Increased bioavailability of amino acids is critical to the synthesis of immunoglobulins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Azzam et al., 2015</xref>); therefore, the significant improvement may be adducible to improved digestibility of amino acids. Also, the small intestine acts as an immune protection barrier in animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Patterson and Burkholder, 2003</xref>), and the improved gut integrity may favor the activities of intestinal mucosal cytokines, thereby enhancing the immune status of the birds. The immunity status of animals is often linked with the animal&#x2019;s capacity to counteract oxidative stress <italic>via</italic> enhanced antioxidant capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wan et al., 2018</xref>), and the enhanced activities of the antioxidant enzymes may be a contributory factor. In one study, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> C-3102 enhanced IgM concentration linearly but had no effect on serum concentrations of IgA and IgG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Liu et al., 2019</xref>). The discrepancies in the studies could be the environmental hygiene and the type of probiotics used. Complement proteins play key roles in immune function; thus, they are often used to assess the immune status of animals. Dietary supplementation of <italic>C. butyricum</italic> enhanced C3 concentration in broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>) and enhanced C3 and C4 concentration in laying hens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>). Further analysis of the immunity index could be measured with the weight of the spleen, probably because the spleen is involved in cellular and humoral immunity of the body. Our findings showed that the relative weight of the spleen was improved with dietary <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and similar to reports in laying hens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Awad et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Zhan et al., 2019</xref>) and that of broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chen et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ahmat et al., 2021</xref>). The aforementioned findings suggest that probiotics as nutritional components in the diets of laying hens can stimulate the local immune system in the gut, although the systemic effects are notable in the blood. The immunomodulatory effect of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> on laying hens was evidenced in the enhanced level of immunoglobulins and the weight of the spleen. We could deduce that the improved immune status and the activities of antioxidant enzymes contributed immensely to the health status, which supported laying performance and production of eggs with better shell and albumen quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS4">
<title>Apparent fecal amino acid digestibility</title>
<p>Data on the digestibility of amino acids using <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> sp. supplemented in laying hens&#x2019; feed are scarce. This study demonstrated that dietary probiotics can effectively improve the fecal digestibility of amino acids and crude protein. This study would be the first study to report the influence of probiotics on the apparent fecal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids. The digestibility of crude protein and most essential amino acids (Val, Met, Met-cys, Ile, Leu, Tyr, Phe, His) and non-essential amino acid (Glycine) was significantly high compared to the control. The enhanced digestibility may be due to the capacity of probiotics to positively influence the host by improving the intestinal structures and suppressing pathogens&#x2019; proliferation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Emami et al., 2020</xref>). It could also be that the probiotics used provided a favorable environment for the degradation of nutrients from feed. There are pieces of evidence that <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> could enhance secretion and activities of digestive enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>) and modulate gut microflora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Duan et al., 2018</xref>), which in turn could promote nutrient absorption. Also, in laying hens, probiotics enhanced nutrient retention, which acts as a catalyst for improved performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Neijat et al., 2019</xref>). A study reported that in broiler diets supplemented with probiotics, increased ileal digestibility of nutrients leads to a corresponding increased performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Mountzouris et al., 2010</xref>). The enhanced digestibility of crude protein may account for the improvement in albumen synthesis; it has been reported that diets with high crude protein values enhance albumen quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Shim et al., 2013</xref>). Therefore, we deduced that the increased digestibility of amino acids was the basis of enhanced immunoglobulin secretions, laying performance, and egg quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS5">
<title>Jejunal villi morphology</title>
<p>Digestion and absorption as key events in the digestive tract occur mainly in the jejunum, which is the part of the small intestine, and significant variations in this region could suggest changes in digestion and absorption capacity across the diets. The villi height, crypt depth, villi width, and surface area all reflect the gut integrity and strength of nutrient absorption capacity. The improved nutrient absorption capacity of the gut is evidenced by decreased crypt depth and increased villi height, villi width, and villi height to crypt depth ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Shamoto and Yamauchi, 2000</xref>). Whereas, shorter villi and deeper crypts cause less utilization of nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xu et al., 2020</xref>) because the energy needed for the metabolic process is diverted to gut cell renewal in response to normal sloughing or inflammatory response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Giannenas et al., 2014</xref>). There are shreds of evidence that <italic>C. butyricum</italic> increased jejunal villi height (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Zhang et al., 2011</xref>) and ileal villi height (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>) and villi height to crypt depth ratio but decreased crypt depth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Xiang et al., 2019</xref>) in laying hens. Also, <italic>C. butyricum</italic> increased villi height and villi height to crypt depth ratio but decreased crypt depth in broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdel-Latif et al., 2018</xref>). In addition, <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. increased jejunal villi height and villi height to crypt depth ratio and decreased crypt depth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pan et al., 2022</xref>) in laying hens. The improvement in gut morphology may be accrued to the capacity of microorganisms present in the gut to extend the length of the intestine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al., 2016</xref>). Our findings are in tandem with the previous findings on enhanced villi height and villi height to crypt depth ratio, broader surface area, and decreased crypt depth due to dietary probiotics. The improved jejunal villi structures could be that <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> enhanced the digestion of carbohydrates and the synthesis of SCFAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Shah et al., 2019</xref>), which supply nutrients to the intestinal goblet cells and protect intestinal epithelial cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Liu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Guo et al., 2021</xref>). Conversely, <italic>C. butyricum</italic> had no distinct influence on the jejunum microscopic structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Wang W. W. et al., 2020</xref>). This could be due to probiotic composition, age of laying hens, and duration of feeding. This suggests that the improvement in amino acid absorption probably was facilitated by improved intestinal structures. We could therefore deduce that improved villi structures, which provided larger absorption surface area, were culminated in enhanced utilization of nutrients in the feed and increased amino acid digestibility, which translated into increased laying performance and egg quality.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p><italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> spores improved protein synthesis and nutrient utilization while regulating gut function and health status in laying hens. The aforementioned findings revealed that the supplementation of <italic>Clostridium</italic> and <italic>Brevibacillus</italic> spores as probiotics in the diet of laying hens might be a promising safe feed additive and an enhancer for the intestinal health of laying hens. In comparison to other treatments, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> (zlc-17) was more efficient in enhancing egg production rate, feed efficiency, albumen quality, immunoglobulin and antioxidant enzymes, amino acid digestibility, and jejunal villi microscopic structures. Hence, 0.02% of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> (zlc-17) is suitable to be supplemented in the diet of laying hens at the peak phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal ethics and Use Committee of the Feed Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. CAAS. No: 20200507S0600103.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S8">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>KQ, T-HS, and S-GW: conceptualization. KQ, X-YC, Y-BS, and UO: resources data. UO: writing &#x2013; original draft. KQ, JW, H-JZ, T-HS, and S-GW: supervision. KQ and UO: writing and editing. S-GW and G-HQ: funding. All authors reviewed and accepted this final version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072774), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1300204), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>T-HS was employed by the COFCO Nutrition and Health Research Institute. Y-BS was employed by the company COFCO (Beijing) Feed Technology Company Limited. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<glossary>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list id="DL1">
<def-item><term>ADFI</term><def><p>average feed intake</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>AEG</term><def><p>average egg weight</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>AH</term><def><p>albumen height</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>BB</term><def><p><italic>Brevibacillus</italic></p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CB</term><def><p><italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic></p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CAT</term><def><p>catalase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CD</term><def><p>crypt depth</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>FCR</term><def><p>feed conversion ratio</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>GST</term><def><p>glutathione transferase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>GSH-Px</term><def><p>glutathione peroxidase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HDP</term><def><p>hen day production</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HU</term><def><p>Haugh unit</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>H/L</term><def><p>heterophil to lymphocyte ratio</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>IgM</term><def><p>immunoglobulin M</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>IgG</term><def><p>immunoglobulin G</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>IgA</term><def><p>immunoglobulin A</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>MCH</term><def><p>mean corpuscular hemoglobin</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>MCV</term><def><p>mean corpuscular volume</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>MDA</term><def><p>malondialdehyde</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ROS</term><def><p>reactive oxygen species</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>RBC</term><def><p>red blood cells count</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>SCFA</term><def><p>short-chain fatty acid</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>TAO-C</term><def><p>Total antioxidant capacity</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>TSOD</term><def><p>Total peroxide dismutase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>VH</term><def><p>Villi height</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>VW</term><def><p>villus width</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>VSA</term><def><p>villi surface area</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>V/C</term><def><p>villi height to crypt depth ratio</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>WBC</term><def><p>white blood cells count.</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdel-Latif</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abd El-Hack</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swelum</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saadeldin</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elbestawy</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shewita</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Single and combined effects of Clostridium butyricum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth indices, intestinal health, and immunity of broilers.</article-title> <source><italic>Animals</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>184</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani8100184</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30347769</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahasan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Agazzi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Invernizzi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bontempo</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savoini</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The beneficial role of probiotics in monogastric animal nutrition and health.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume> <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15406/jdvar.2015.02.00041</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahiwe</surname> <given-names>E. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdallh</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang&#x2019;a</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Omede</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Qahtani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gausi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Influence of dietary supplementation of autolyzed whole yeast and yeast cell wall products on broiler chickens. <italic>Asian Australas</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>579</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LFB112 on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune, and Serum Biochemical Response in Broiler Chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>Antibiotics</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1427</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics10111427</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34827365</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Khalaifah</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>97</volume> <fpage>3807</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3815</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arp&#x00E1;&#x0161;ov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ka&#x010D;&#x00E1;niov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pistov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00E1;lik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hleba</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effect of Probiotics and Humic Acid on Egg Production and Quality Parameters of Laying Hens Eggs.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Papers</italic></source> <volume>49</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Attia</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Harthi</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abo El-Maaty</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Calcium and cholecalciferol levels in late-phase laying hens: Effects on productive traits, egg quality, blood biochemistry, and immune responses.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Vet. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>389</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2020.00389</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Awad</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghareeb</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x00F6;hm</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of addition of a probiotic micro-organism to broiler diet on intestinal mucosal architecture and electrophysiological parameters.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>94</volume> <fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>494</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0396.2009.00933.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19906141</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Azzam</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>X. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of excess dietary L-valine on laying hen performance, egg quality, serum free amino acids, immune function and antioxidant enzyme activity.</article-title> <source><italic>Br. Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00071668.2014.989487</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25409658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Camarda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newell</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nasti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di Modugno</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Genotyping Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from the gut and oviduct of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Avian Dis.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>912</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11195647</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>C&#x00E9;,sar</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maribel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00E9;sar</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robles</surname> <given-names>E. F. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of probiotic <italic>Bifidobacterium animalis</italic> as an alternative to growth-promoting antibiotics on performance, egg quality, and health parameters in young laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Res. Square.</italic></source> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.3.rs-1204725/v1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The effects and combinational effects of Bacillus subtilis and montmorillonite supplementation on performance, egg quality, oxidation status, and immune response in laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Liv. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>227</volume> <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of probiotics in diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, blood characteristics, relative organ weight and breast meat characteristics in broilers.</article-title> <source><italic>Br. Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>641</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00071668.2013.825369</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24112072</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koumoutsi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scholz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisenreich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinemeyer</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth&#x2013;promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Biotech.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>1007</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1014</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt1325</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17704766</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Dietary palygorskite supplementation improves immunity, oxidative status, intestinal integrity, and barrier function of broilers at early age.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Tech.</italic></source> <volume>219</volume> <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darsi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhaghari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation on productive performance, egg quality and hatchability in broiler breeder hens under commercial farm condition.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Anim. Res</italic>.</source> <volume>49</volume> <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Palygorskite combined probiotics improve the laying performance, hatching performance, egg quality, plasma antioxidative status, and immune response of broiler breeders.</article-title> <source><italic>Ital. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>1292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1301</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Changes in the intestine microbial, digestive, and immune-related genes of Litopenaeus vannamei in response to dietary probiotic Clostridium butyricum supplementation.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Micro.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>2191</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02191</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Emami</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kimminau</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dalloul</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of probiotics and multi-component feed additives on microbiota, gut barrier and immune responses in broiler chickens during subclinical necrotic enteritis.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Vet. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>572142</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2020.572142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fathi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Homidan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Dokhail</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ebeid</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abou-Emera</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alsagan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) supplementation on productive performance, immune response and egg quality characteristics in laying hens under high ambient temperature.</article-title> <source><italic>Ital. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>804</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>814</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization Expert Consultation</collab> (<year>2001</year>). <source><italic>Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of powder milk and live lactic acid bacteria</italic>.</source> <publisher-loc>C&#x00F3;rdoba</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization.</publisher-name></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forte</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moscati</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Acuti</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mugnai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franciosini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costarelli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on laying performance, egg quality, blood biochemistry and immune response of organic laying hens</article-title>. <source><italic>J. Anim. Phys. Anim. Nutr</italic></source>. <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>977</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>987</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The anti-bacterial activity research of biocontrol bacteria JK-2 on Fusarium oxysporum.</article-title> <source><italic>Fujian J. Agric. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giannenas</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsalie</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Triantafillou</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hessenberger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teichmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohnl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Assessment of probiotics supplementation <italic>via</italic> feed or water on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens after experimental infection with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella.</article-title> <source><italic>Avian Pathol</italic>.</source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gungor</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erener</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of dietary raw and fermented sour cherry kernel (Prunus cerasus L.) on digestibility, intestinal morphology and caecal microflora in broiler chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>478</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of long-term Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 1.921 supplementation on performance, egg quality, and fecal and cecal microbiota of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>1280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1289</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pew389</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27789747</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of Different Fermented Feeds on Production Performance, Cecal Microorganisms, and Intestinal Immunity of Laying Hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Animals</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>2799</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11102799</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34679821</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haghighi</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gyles</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanei</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Probiotics stimulate production of natural antibodies in chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>Clin. Vacc. Immunol</italic>.</source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>975</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>980</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jahns</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilhelm</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jablonowski</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mothes</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greulich</surname> <given-names>K. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Butyrate modulates antioxidant enzyme expression in malignant and non-malignant human colon tissues.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Carcino.</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mc.22102</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24677319</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>93</volume> <fpage>3097</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2014-04086</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25260523</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kogut</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klasing</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>An immunologist&#x2019;s perspective on nutrition, immunity, and infectious diseases: Introduction and overview.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Poult. Res.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>G. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Q. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Oral administration of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> for modulating gastrointestinal microflora in mice.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Microb.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume> <fpage>512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-010-9737-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20711781</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajput</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Influence of dietary inclusion of Bacillus licheniformis on laying performance, egg quality, antioxidant enzyme activities, and intestinal barrier function of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>92</volume> <fpage>2389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2395</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2012-02686</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23960122</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> C-3102 on production, hatching performance, egg quality, serum antioxidant capacity and immune response of laying breeders.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>103</volume> <fpage>182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>190</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.13022</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30484908</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Macit</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaoglu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Celebi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Esenbuga</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoruk</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaya</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of supplementation of dietary humate, probiotic, and their combination on performance, egg quality, and yolk fatty acid composition of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Trop. Anim. Health Prod.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume>:<fpage>63</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-020-02546-6</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33389265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Markowiak</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x015A;li&#x017C;ewska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition.</article-title> <source><italic>Gut. Pathogens.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mazanko</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gorlov</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prazdnova</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makarenko</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usatov</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bren</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus</italic> probiotic supplementations improve laying performance, egg quality, hatching of laying hens, and sperm quality of roosters.</article-title> <source><italic>Probi. Antim. Prot</italic>.</source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>367</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>373</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12602-017-9369-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29238921</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meimandipour</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shuhaimi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soleimani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azhar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hair-Bejo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kabeir</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Selected microbial groups and short-chain fatty acids profile in a simulated chicken cecum supplemented with two strains of Lactobacillus.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>89</volume> <fpage>470</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2009-00495</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20181862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mikulski</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jankowski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mikulska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demey</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary probiotic (<italic>Pediococcus acidilactici</italic>) supplementation on productive performance, egg quality, and body composition in laying hens fed diets varying in energy density.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>2275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2285</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.046</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32241513</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mountzouris</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsitrsikos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palamidi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arvaniti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohnl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schatzmayr</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>89</volume> <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2009-00308</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20008803</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mwaniki</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neijat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiarie</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Egg production and quality responses of adding up to 7.5% defatted black soldier fly larvae meal in a corn-soybean meal diet fed to Shaver White Leghorns from wk 19 to 27 of age.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>97</volume> <fpage>2829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2835</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pey118</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29669038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>National Research and Council</collab> (<year>1994</year>). <source><italic>Nutrient requirements of poultry: Ninth revised edition</italic>.</source> <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>The National Academies Press.</publisher-name></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neijat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shirley</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thiery</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Welsher</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiarie</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of dietary supplementation of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> DSM29784 on hen performance, egg quality indices, and apparent retention of dietary components in laying hens from 19 to 48 weeks of age.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>5622</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5635</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez324</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31222316</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nwachukwu</surname> <given-names>C. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aliyu</surname> <given-names>K. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ewuola</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Growth indices, intestinal histomorphology, and blood profile of rabbits fed probiotics-and prebiotics-supplemented diets.</article-title> <source><italic>Trans. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>txab096</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/tas/txab096</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34316539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Probiotic Effects of Bacillus licheniformis DSM5749 on Growth Performance and Intestinal Microecological Balance of Laying Hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>868093</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2022.868093</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Panda</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bisht</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeMondal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senthil Kumar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurusubramanian</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panigrahi</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Brevibacillus as a biological tool: A short review.</article-title> <source><italic>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> <fpage>623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>639</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10482-013-0099-7</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24563152</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The effect of dietary Bacillus subtilis supplementation on the growth performance, blood profile, nutrient retention, and caecal microflora in broiler chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Anim. Res.</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>868</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>872</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patterson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkholder</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>631</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pisoschi</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pop</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iordache</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanca</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Predoi</surname></name> <name><surname>Serban</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Oxidative stress mitigation by antioxidants-an overview on their chemistry and influences on health status.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Med. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>209</volume>:<fpage>112891</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112891</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33032084</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Purba</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pirzado</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haile</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A study about Protective Effect of Brevibacillus laterosporus texasporus Culture on Broiler Chickens Infected with <italic>Salmonella</italic> Pullorum.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Sci. Tech. Mgt.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis, as an alternative to antibiotics, on growth performance, serum immunity, and intestinal health in broiler chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Nutr</italic>.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>786878</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2021.786878</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chowdhury</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dey</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khatun</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Comparative effects of feeding single-and multi-strain probiotics to commercial layers on the productive performance and egg quality indices.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Poult. Res.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>100257</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sarlak</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabeidian</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toghyani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahraki</surname> <given-names>A. D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Habibian</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of replacing inorganic with organic iron on performance, egg quality, serum and egg yolk lipids, antioxidant status, and iron accumulation in eggs of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Trace Elem. Res.</italic></source> <volume>199</volume> <fpage>1986</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1999</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12011-020-02284-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32666433</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaneb</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masood</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashraf</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sikandar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of dietary supplementation of zinc and multi-microbe probiotic on growth traits and alteration of intestinal architecture in broiler.</article-title> <source><italic>Prob. Antimicrob. Prot.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>931</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>937</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12602-018-9424-9</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29680883</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shamoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamauchi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Recovery responses of chick intestinal villus morphology to different refeeding procedures.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>79</volume> <fpage>718</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>723</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ps/79.5.718</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10824961</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sherman</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ossa</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson-Henry</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Unraveling mechanisms of action of probiotics.</article-title> <source><italic>Nutr. Clin. Pract</italic>.</source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>I. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis RX7 and B2A supplementation on productive performance, egg quality, blood profiles, and excreta <italic>Salmonella</italic> counts in laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>417</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shim</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Billard</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aggrey</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pesti</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sodsee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of balanced dietary protein levels on egg production and egg quality parameters of individual commercial layers.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>92</volume> <fpage>2687</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2696</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2012-02569</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24046416</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary supplementation of microencapsulated <italic>Enterococcus fecalis</italic> and the extract of Camellia oleifera seed on laying performance, egg quality, serum biochemical parameters, and cecal microflora diversity in laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>2880</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2887</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez033</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30850828</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krause</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonamigo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zavarize</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders.</article-title> <source><italic>Animals</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3084</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11113084</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34827816</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Surai</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kochish</surname> <given-names>I. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fisinin</surname> <given-names>V. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kidd</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant defence systems and oxidative stress in poultry biology: An update.&#x201D;</article-title> <source><italic>Antioxidants</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>235</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox8070235</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31336672</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCartney</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knox</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Francesch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oka</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of the butyric acid-producing strain <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> MIYAIRI 588 on broiler and piglet zootechnical performance and prevention of necrotic enteritis.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Sci. J.</italic></source> <volume>89</volume> <fpage>895</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/asj.13006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29603498</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on productive performance of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Ital. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>436</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thiam</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barreto S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Association of Heterophil/Lymphocyte Ratio with Intestinal Barrier Function and Immune Response to <italic>Salmonella</italic> enteritidis Infection in Chicken.</article-title> <source><italic>Animals</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3498</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11123498</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34944274</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Upadhaya</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rudeaux</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>I. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of dietary Bacillus subtilis and <italic>Bacillus licheniformis</italic> supplementation continuously in pullet and lay period on egg production, excreta microflora, and egg quality of Hyline-Brown birds.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>4722</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4728</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez184</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31065703</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Varzaru</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Untea</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olteanu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panaite</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schitea</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Development and validation of an RP-HPLC method for methionine, cystine and lysine separation and determination in corn samples.</article-title> <source><italic>Ilie. Van. Rev. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>679</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Alginate oligosaccharide enhances intestinal integrity of weaned pigs through altering intestinal inflammatory responses and antioxidant status.</article-title> <source><italic>RSC Adv.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>13482</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13492</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c8ra01943f</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35542522</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> supplementation and calcium levels on performance and eggshell quality of laying hens in the late phase of production.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>100970</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.067</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33518333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of different levels of cottonseed meal on laying performance, egg quality, intestinal immunity and hepatic histopathology in laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Food Agric. Immunol.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>803</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>812</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B85"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x2019;inca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Dietary live yeast and mannan-oligosaccharide supplementation attenuate intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction induced by <italic>Escherichia coli in broilers. Br. J. Nutr</italic>.</article-title> <volume>116</volume> <fpage>1878</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1888</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> on production performance and intestinal absorption function of laying hens in the late phase of production.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Feed Sci. Techn</italic>.</source> <volume>264</volume>:<fpage>114476</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Houtkooper</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Auwerx</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic use and abuse: A threat.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>93</volume> <fpage>3097</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3103</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic>, sodium butyrate, and butyric acid glycerides on the reproductive performance, egg quality, intestinal health, and offspring performance of yellow-feathered breeder hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbio.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>657542</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.657542</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khalid</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> to substitute in-feed antibiotics on the production, blood biochemistry and egg quality indices of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Vet. Res.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>400</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-020-02570-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of different probiotics on laying performance, egg quality, oxidative status, and gut health in laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Animals</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1110</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani9121110</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31835513</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Lactobacillus salivarius CML352 Isolated from Chinese Local Breed Chicken Modulates the Gut Microbiota and Improves Intestinal Health and Egg Quality in Late-Phase Laying Hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Microorganisms</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>726</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10040726</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35456777</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azzam</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on laying performance, egg quality, blood biochemistry, antioxidant capacity and immunity of laying hens during the late laying period.</article-title> <source><italic>Ital. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>1180</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1187</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of the use of a combination of two Bacillus species on performance, egg quality, small intestinal mucosal morphology, and cecal microbiota profile in aging laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Probiot. Antimicrob. Prot</italic>.</source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>213</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12602-019-09532-x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30810908</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B86"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khalid</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of Bacillus velezensis to substitute in-feed antibiotics on the production, blood biochemistry and egg quality indices of laying hens</article-title>. <source><italic>BMC Vet. Res</italic></source>. <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary supplementation with <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> on laying performance, egg quality, serum parameters, and cecal microflora of laying hens in the late phase of production.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>896</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>903</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pey436</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30285187</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary lipids and <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic> on the performance and the digestive tract of broiler chickens.</article-title> <source><italic>Arch. Anim. Nutr</italic>.</source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>339</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1745039x.2011.568274</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21888038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Green tea powder supplementation increased viscosity and decreased lysozyme activity of egg white during storage of eggs from Huainan partridge chicken.</article-title> <source><italic>Ital. J. Anim. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>586</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>592</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>X. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic>, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K88.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Anim. Sci. Biotech.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-016-0061-4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26819705</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of dietary serine supplementation on performance, egg quality, serum indices, and ileal mucosal immunity in laying hens fed a low crude protein diet.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume>:<fpage>101465</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2021.101465</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34634711</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> BLCC1-0238 can effectively improve laying performance and egg quality via enhancing immunity and regulating reproductive hormones of laying hens.</article-title> <source><italic>Prob. Antmb. Prot.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12602-019-9524-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30834486</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of sodium butyrate on intestinal health and gut microbiota composition during intestinal inflammation progression in broilers.</article-title> <source><italic>Poult. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>98</volume> <fpage>4449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4456</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez279</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31162611</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>