Susceptibility to Metabolic Diseases in COVID-19: To be or Not to be an Issue
Maryam Kaviani1† 
Somayeh Keshtkar1,2† 
Saeede Soleimanian1 
Fatemeh Sabet Sarvestani1 
Negar Azarpira1* Sara Pakbaz3- 1Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- 2Molecular Dermatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Despite the passage of more than 17 months from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, challenges regarding the disease and its related complications still continue in recovered patients. Thus, various studies are underway to assay the long-term effects of COVID-19. Some patients, especially those with severe symptoms, experience susceptibility to a range of diseases and substantial organ dysfunction after recovery. Although COVID-19 primarily affects the lungs, multiple reports exist on the effect of this infection on the kidneys, cardiovascular system, and gastrointestinal tract. Studies have also indicated the increased risk of severe COVID-19 in patients with diabetes. On the other hand, COVID-19 may predispose patients to diabetes, as the most common metabolic disease. Recent studies have shown that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, which are expressed in the tissues and organs involved in regulating the metabolic status including pancreas, adipose tissue, gastrointestinal tract, and kidneys. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 may result in metabolic disturbance. However, there are still many unknowns about SARS-CoV-2, which are required to be explored in basic studies. In this context, special attention to molecular pathways is warranted for understanding the pathogenesis of the disease and achieving therapeutic opportunities. Hence, the present review aims to focus on the molecular mechanisms associated with the susceptibility to metabolic diseases amongst patients recovered from COVID-19.
Introduction
Investigation of the history of medicine indicates that the outbreak of viral respiratory infections is not a new phenomenon. During the past century, there have been several reports on the prevalence of respiratory infections including Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-1 (SARS-CoV-1) (Tratner 2003) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) (Lancet 2013). Since December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has become the most challenging issue throughout the world. Many studies have been done on the nature of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its therapeutic strategies (Cardamone and Donatiello 2020; Schlosser et al., 2020).
Although COVID-19 has been primarily recognized as a respiratory infection, clinical evidence has demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 affects multiple organs (de-Madaria et al., 2020; Ridruejo and Soza 2020; Sharma et al., 2020; Hunt et al., 2021; Nalbandian et al., 2021). Therefore, post- COVID-19 complications are predictable in recovered patients. For instance, it has been hypothesized that COVID-19 may result in metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome refers to a cluster of conditions that rises the risk of cardiovascular disorders and type II diabetes (Eckel et al., 2005). The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported the metabolic syndrome criteria in 2006 (Zafar et al., 2018), which have been summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome.
Recent studies have indicated that SARS-CoV-2 binds to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors. These receptors mediate the transmission and infection processes of the virus. The virus has spike (S) glycoprotein on its surface, which can attach to the cell surface in order to turn this glycoprotein into two domains (S1 and S2) and exert its effect. This separation is allowed by FURIN and Transmembrane Serine Protease (TMPRSS2). In this way, S1 binds to ACE2 receptors and S2 binds to the cell membrane, allowing the virus to enter the cell through endocytosis (Ding and Liang 2020; Mönkemüller et al., 2020). In fact, after the virus binds to ACE2, the receptor’s ectodomain is cleaved. Then, the transmembrane domain is internalized by endocytosis. On the other hand, the whole ACE2 molecule can enter the cell with the virus (Li et al., 2005). ACE2 is expressed in the tissues and organs involved in regulating the metabolic status including pancreas (Liu et al., 2020), gastrointestinal tract (Qi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020), liver (Chai et al., 2020), and kidneys (Qi et al., 2020). Thus, metabolic syndrome may be a potential complication in patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2 (Lee et al., 2021; Sathish et al., 2021).
Zhang et al. reported abnormal plasma metabolomic profiles in patients recovered from COVID-19 without any underlying diseases. They found that some clinical indicators were abnormal in patients recovered from moderate and severe COVID-19 3 months after discharge. These parameters included taurine, succinic acid, hippuric acid, some indoles, and lipid species that were associated with the functions of kidneys, lungs, heart, liver, and the coagulation system (Zhang et al., 2021). Moreover, Holmes et al. referred to the post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the post-acute phase of the disease. They analyzed the blood samples of 27 patients 3 month after acute COVID-19 infection. The findings indicated disruptions in several parameters including taurine and glutamine/glutamate ratio. These results demonstrated the possibility of damages to the liver and muscles in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the post-acute phase (Holmes et al., 2021). On the other hand, the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that severe COVID-19 was associated with elevated blood glucose levels and a slight increase in HbA1c levels (Chen Juan et al., 2020). Although limited studies have been conducted on patients’ follow-up after COVID-19 infection, the results obtained so far have shown the fluctuation of multiple metabolic indicators in patients recovered from COVID-19, especially its severe form.
While a variety of studies have shown that several underlying diseases including diabetes (Gupta et al., 2020), kidney diseases (Rabb 2020), and cardiovascular disorders (Li Jialing et al., 2020) increase the severity and mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infection, the association between COVID-19 and the onset of some diseases needs to be determined. Hence, the present review aims to investigate the mechanisms involved in the susceptibility of recovered patients to metabolic syndrome. In this regard, the organs involved in metabolic syndrome including pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and liver (Figure 1) have been discussed and the relationships between these organs and COVID-19 have been addressed.
FIGURE 1. A summary of the possible effects of COVID-19 infection on the development of metabolic syndrome.
The Effect of COVID-19 on the Pancreas
There is a growing body of evidence on the bidirectional relationship between diabetes and COVID-19. This implies that while patients with diabetes experience more severe forms of COVID-19, patients with COVID-19 may develop metabolic complications and diabetes (Rubino et al., 2020).
Diabetes has been introduced as a risk factor for higher morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Evidence has revealed that COVID-19 may affect the pathophysiology of diabetes through increased ACE-2 expression, increased paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme (FURIN), impaired T-cell function, and increased interleukin-6 (Singh et al., 2020). Therefore, patients with diabetes need special clinical management to avoid the progressive damage. On the other hand, due to the diabetogenic nature of COVID-19, evaluation of recovered patients is essential. In this regard, investigation of the underlying mechanisms that lead to the onset of diabetes in patients with COVID-19 can be beneficial for the prevention and management of the issue.
It seems that the most important mechanism related to the COVID-19 complications is the expression pattern of the Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) of ACE2 on cells, as a binding site for SARS-COV-2 (El-Huneidi et al., 2021). Studies have shown that ACE2 is expressed in the β-cells of the pancreas. Thus, SARS-COV-2 may exert direct effects on pancreatic β-cells, subsequently resulting in glucose and metabolic instability. Analysis of the GTEx database revealed a higher expression of ACE2 in the pancreas than in lungs. Moreover, evaluation of ACE2 distribution in the pancreas showed the expression of this receptor in both exocrine and endocrine parts (Liu et al., 2020). Liu et al. evaluated pancreatic injury after COVID-19 infection in a cohort study on 121 patients. They found that pancreatic injury occurred mainly in severe COVID-19 infection, which was suggested to be associated with ACE2 expression in the pancreas (Liu et al., 2020). Researchers also focused on the potential of COVID-19 to affect the endocrine pancreas through the activation of NHA2 as a Na+/H+ Exchanger (NHE) (Cure E. and Cumhur Cure M., 2020). Based on the previous studies, NHA2 is present in human pancreatic β-cells. Additionally, in vitro and in vivo assays have indicated that NHA2 is critical for insulin secretion in β-cells (Deisl et al., 2013). Accordingly, NHA2 deficiency is accompanied by a decrease in insulin secretion. On the other hand, increased NHA2 activity leads to insulin resistance. In COVID-19 infection, conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7 decreases after blocking the ACE2 receptors by the virus. The elevated level of angiotensin II leads to the increase of insulin resistance. Cure et al. also suggested that the chymase pathway was probably involved in the formation of angiotensin II. Chymase is a major non-ACE pathway in the generation of angiotensin II. Through this alternative pathway, angiotensin-(1–12) and angiotensin I are converted to angiotensin II by the proteolytic enzymatic activity of chymase. Although the role of this pathway in COVID-19 disease is not well known, chymase may be a potential mediator. Garvin et al. proposed the positive interplay between the kallikrein-bradykinin system and chymase in COVID-19 patients (Garvin et al., 2020).
Activation of NHE by angiotensin II results in the increase of Na+ and H+ exchange as well as Na+ and Ca2+ exchange. In this regard, H+ ions accumulate out of the cell and make the microenvironment acidic and hypoxic. Subsequent to hypoxia, reactive oxygen radicals increase. Oxidative stress plays a fundamental role in metabolic syndrome. Besides, accumulation of reactive products can develop insulin resistance. Increased levels of Ca2+ and Na+ also damage cells (Cure E. and Cumhur Cure M., 2020).
Hypoxia is yet another factor that can affect the function of the endocrine pancreas. In hypoxia due to COVID-19 infection, the lactate level elevates. The increased level of lactate causes the increment of H+ ions, which move inside cells and make NHE overactive (Cure Erkan and Cumhur Cure Medine, 2020). Moreover, there is a dynamic relationship between lactate and glucose. Lactate has been introduced as the major gluconeogenic precursor that increases glucose production (Bergman et al., 2000; Emhoff et al., 2013). This situation can impose an additional burden on the pancreas and can be destructive in severe and prolonged COVID-19 infection.
In conclusion, the new onset of diabetes in non-diabetic patients and exacerbation of diabetes in those suffering from the disease have been reported subsequent to COVID-19 infection. According to the abovementioned information, paying attention to the basic mechanisms involved in the interaction between COVID-19 infection and diabetes is a useful guide for taking preventive and therapeutic measures. Considering the high expression of ACE2 receptors in pancreatic β-cells, they may be damaged by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, early diagnosis and careful management of patients with COVID-19 are needed to avoid further complications related to hyperglycemia and metabolic imbalance. Moreover, targeting ACE2 has been proposed to mitigate infectivity (Jia et al., 2021). Recently, strategies related to ACE2 targeting such as decreasing Ang II to decoy receptor (Haschke et al., 2013), blocking ACE2 (Huentelman et al., 2004), enhancing ACE2 shedding (Jia et al., 2009), and facilitating ACE2 internalization (Touret et al., 2020) have been used for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. All in all, the diabetogenic potential of COVID-19 requires further studies to determine its main characteristics and persistence, especially in cases with new onset diabetes.
The Effect of COVID-19 on the Gastrointestinal Tract
The primary function of the gut is to supply the body with energy via building elements and water/electrolytes. Energy homoeostasis consists of two principal functional states; i.e., catabolic state and anabolic state. The switch between these two metabolic conditions is related to meal ingestion and digestion/absorption and is thus dependent on the functional state of the gastrointestinal tract (Fändriks 2017). The gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in maintaining the homeostasis of human health (Festi et al., 2014). The human intestinal microbiota composition is the result of a bilateral interaction between the host and its microbial consortium. In fact, the composition and stability of the intestinal microbiota are determined by nutrition, drugs, diseases, etc. (Hur and Lee 2015). Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota caused by various factors leads to extensive physiological changes and increases the risk of metabolic syndrome (Festi et al., 2014).
It mainly infects lung cells, but may involve the gastrointestinal tract that has ACE2 receptors in the epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosa, but not in the esophagus and stomach (He et al., 2006; Gu and Korteweg 2007; Xiao et al., 2020). In the gastrointestinal tract, ACE2 has been described as a key regulator of dietary amino acid homeostasis, expression of antimicrobial peptides, local innate immunity, and gut microbial ecology (Hashimoto et al., 2012). In fact, ACE2 is associated with the amino acid carrier, B0AT1, which regulates the intestinal flora. This occurs because this transporter allows the absorption of tryptophan, which stimulates the mTOR path to produce antimicrobial peptides. Thus, the SARS-CoV-2 infection changes and blocks the ACE2 receptors in the brush edge, causing tryptophan deficiency and lower production of antimicrobial peptides, which can in turn cause changes in the intestinal microbiota and result in inflammation (Ding and Liang 2020; Mönkemüller et al., 2020). On the other hand, the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 in the gastrointestinal tract may lead to damage to the barrier function via disrupting barrier proteins ZO-1, occludin, and claudins as well as an increase in inflammatory cytokines production, which may in turn lead to dysbiosis and exacerbation of intestinal inflammation (Fernández-Blanco et al., 2015; Chen Li et al., 2020). Besides, intestinal inflammation may augment dysbiosis and damage the intestinal mucosal barrier function. Moreover, intestinal lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages may perpetuate the cytokine storm (Fernández-Blanco et al., 2015).
Preventing interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 RBD and ACE2 may be an effective strategy to prevent viral infections. In this way, ACE2 inhibitors can affect intestinal amino acid metabolism, antibacterial peptide secretion, intestinal microbial homeostasis, and innate immunity through the mTOR pathway (Hashimoto et al., 2012; Li et al., 2020). Furthermore, metabolic syndrome can be improved through the alteration of intestinal microbiota via the administration of probiotics and prebiotics that increase the short chain fatty acid production as well as by using a diet with 30% fat content and a high fruit and vegetable content such as the Mediterranean diet (Santos-Marcos et al., 2019).
The Effect of COVID-19 on Kidneys
Evidence has revealed an association between Chronic Kidney disease (CKD) and the metabolic syndrome (Wu et al., 2021). A significant correlation has also been reported between kidney insufficiency and diabetes, obesity, and hypertension (Culleton et al., 1999). The metabolic syndrome related to renal dysfunction results from various factors (Peralta et al., 2006) including hyperinsulinemia (insulin resistance), activation of the renin-angiotensin system, abnormal production of growth factors, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Among these factors, hyperinsulinemia is the most important risk factor for the metabolic syndrome associated with CKD, which induces renal damage mechanisms (El-Achkar et al., 2005). On the other hand, kidney is a major organ in the regulation of glucose and plays a key role in glucose reabsorption and filtration (Rabkin et al., 1984). Furthermore, kidneys primarily metabolize insulin, resulting in the degradation of circulating insulin (Mather and Pollock 2011). Considering renal function in the clearance of insulin, renal insufficiency affects glucose homeostasis and alters insulin metabolism (Duckworth et al., 1998; Garla et al., 2017). According to these findings, CKD and diabetes are complicatedly intertwined. This implies that the management of metabolic abnormalities due to CKD is a major challenge for clinicians (Garla et al., 2017). Therefore, any reason for renal complication may lead to the disturbance of glucose metabolism and, subsequently, the development of metabolic syndrome.
Renal injury results from viral infections through direct and indirect invasion by offending viruses, leading to cytopathic injury followed by renal cells injury (Prasad and Patel 2018). Re-emergence of different viral infections has been a recent pattern associated with kidney diseases (Morens et al., 2004). In this context, the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have been overrunning, being a challenge facing healthcare systems worldwide (Cheng et al., 2020). Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), as a major complication of COVID-19, arises from multifactorial mechanisms and increases the risk of mortality in these patients (Lili et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2021). Furthermore, CKD develops in AKI-recovered patients as a long-term renal dysfunction. Notably, kidney transplant patients as well as individuals with CKD are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 (Jager et al., 2020), and patients with severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of AKI as a frequent complication (Ng et al., 2021). It has been revealed that podocytes and proximal tubular epithelial cells are present as a kidney tropism upon SARS-CoV-2 infection. Progression of the renal injury initiates through changes in the metabolism of kidney cells, resulting in metabolic diseases (Yan et al., 2018; Legouis et al., 2020). Generally, two scenarios can be considered for kidney injury and decreased function of this organ in patients with COVID-19. The main scenario is the direct infection of renal cells with SARS-CoV-2, which is in accordance with the fact that kidney is one of the particular targets of COVID-19 through ACE2 receptors. In the second scenario, systemic alterations in metabolism stemming from the immune system response may lead to AKI in patients with COVID-19 (Andrade Silva et al., 2021a). Based on a follow-up study on COVID-19-recovered patients, the kidney expresses the ACE2 receptors like the heart, lung, and gut (Diao et al., 2020). Moreover, the Proximal Convoluted Tubule (PCT) of the host renal cells consists of two important receptors, namely ACE2 and Transmembrane protease Serine 2 (TMPRSSs), for viral entry (Pan et al., 2020). After entry, accumulation of the extracellular matrix occurs and causes diuresis and proliferation of kidney cells, finally leading to AKI (Balachandar et al., 2020). Intriguingly, a recent investigation found that AKI following COVID-19 was associated with the increased binding of the virus to the ACE2 receptors (Perico et al., 2020). Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 entry process was promoted through the proteolytic activity of TMPRSS (Shen et al., 2017). After SARS-CoV-2 enters renal cells, in case the cells’ inflammatory system can pass the threshold for activating the Nucleotide-binding Domain (NOD)-like Receptor Protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, cell death will occur via pyroptosis (Qing et al., 2020). The NLRP3 inflammasome is a cytosolic protein complex, which is a crucial regulator of the inflammation pathway and the innate immune response (Martinon et al., 2009). Hence, inflammasome has a central role in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory disorders such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, and arthritis (Schroder et al., 2010; Davis et al., 2011). There are three pathways for this intracellular protein complex to become activated. In the first pathway, the spike protein SARS-CoV-2 directly stimulates the NLRP3 inflammasome by binding to renal cells via the ACE2 receptors. In the second pathway, activation of the Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System (RAAS) increases the level of angiotensin II, which induces the NLRP3 inflammasome after attaching to the angiotensin I receptor. In the third pathway, some cleavage fragments including C3a and C5a as anaphylatoxins and C5bC9 as a membrane attack complex are released through the direct interaction between the Complement Cascade (ComC) and SARS-CoV-2, which may lead to the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome (Ratajczak and Kucia 2020). It should be noted that the hyper-activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is a significant problem for human host cells, resulting in the perturbation of mitochondrial function, cell death, and severe kidney tissue injury (van den Berg and Te Velde 2020). This results from the fact that NLRP3 activation leads to caspase-1 cleavage, induction of other Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs), and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 (Freeman and Swartz 2020). Therefore, this activation should be downregulated through increasing antibodies and adequate adaptive responses (Ros et al., 2020). The overstimulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and cell death pathways can influence renal functionality, leading to inflammation and kidney damage, triggering alterations in tubular epithelial cell metabolism, and finally resulting in metabolic disturbance (Li et al., 2019). Yet, further studies are required to clarify the molecular mechanisms involved in metabolic dysfunction during COVID-19 progression.
Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs) are a type of pattern recognition receptors, which have been revealed as another potential receptor binding to the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 (Choudhury and Mukherjee 2020). Based on the recent studies, the interaction between TLR-4 receptors and SARS-CoV-2 results in the induction of inflammatory responses and profoundly affects the metabolism of mitochondrial, lipid, and glycolytic homeostasis in antigen presenting cells including macrophages and dendritic cells, eventually affecting the systemic metabolism (Perrin-Cocon et al., 2018; Lauterbach et al., 2019). Furthermore, activation of TLR4 leads to a severe inflammation pathway in kidneys, thereby causing AKI (Andrade-Silva et al., 2018; Andrade Silva et al., 2021b). However, it remains unknown whether metabolic dysfunction after recovery from COVID-19 can be correlated to TLRs signaling in kidneys. Therefore, recovered patients are recommended to be followed up to ensure the absence of underlying conditions stemming from COVID-19. In this context, creatinine levels have to be monitored frequently for acute kidney damage after recovery from COVID-19. Now, the key question rises whether such compounds as NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors and ComC inhibitors that mitigate the innate immunity activation can be considered a therapeutic option. In this regard, mesenchymal stromal cells can be nominated as the potential modulators of the immune system.
The Effect of COVID-19 on the Liver
Liver is known as a key organ in the regulation of necessary routs for the maintenance of systemic metabolic hemostasis. The regulation of lipid and glucose hemostasis is orchestrated by hepatocytes. Following metabolic imbalance between glucose and lipid metabolism, hepatic steatosis occurs. In fact, whenever the amount of liver fat reaches more than 5% of the liver weight, hepatic steatosis occurs, irrespective of alcohol consumption (Rosselli et al., 2014). Accordingly, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) has been identified as the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome, because it is closely related to the impaired metabolism of fatty acids, lipoproteins, and glucose (Rosselli et al., 2014; Godoy-Matos et al., 2020). NAFLD is in fact the most common liver disease that is associated with metabolic and cardiovascular disorders including insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type II diabetes. Recently, a number of international experts have suggested definition criteria for the metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The definition of MAFLD includes hepatic steatosis confirmed through histological, imaging, or blood biomarkers together with at least one of the three main criteria of metabolic disorder; i.e., overweight/obesity, type II diabetes, and the presence of metabolic dysregulation. According to epidemiological assessments, the highest prevalence of MAFLD has been detected in Middle East and South America where almost half of the population have the metabolic syndrome. It is noteworthy that advanced hepatic fibrosis is observed in about 7% of people with hepatic steatosis and its incidence is almost doubled in the presence of metabolic syndrome (Godoy-Matos et al., 2020).
The prevalence of liver injury following COVID-19 has been reported to be 21.5–46%. Additionally, it has been found to be associated with multifactorial and heterogeneous reasons that are required to be monitored closely and continuously. Thus, in the context of COVID-19, it should be explored whether the liver damage is related to the side effects of the drugs used for COVID-19 treatment, the direct effect of the virus, an underlying liver disease, and/or combination in the disease course. Liver damage has been supposed to be more severe in patients with NAFLD. Up to now, different mechanism of liver injury caused by COVID-19 infection have been proposed (Yu et al., 2021). The first mechanism may be a direct damage to the liver via ACE2 receptors. ACE2 is widely expressed in hepatobiliary system cells including hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (Alqahtani and Schattenberg 2020). Two other receptors called TMPRSS2 and FURIN are also important for infection in hepatic cells (Marjot et al., 2021). The expression of ACE2 is higher in cholangiocytes than in hepatocytes. TMPRSS2 and FURIN are expressed in many liver cells types. However, very few hepatocytes express both ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Cholangiocytes play a key role in liver regeneration and immune response, and their dysfunction can lead to hepatic damage. In a recent study, Chai et al. evaluated the expression of ACE2 in healthy human liver tissues and demonstrated that viruses might directly bind to ACE2-positive cholangiocytes, but not to hepatocytes. Thus, they suggested that the liver damage in patients with SARS and COVID-19 might not be associated with the direct infection of hepatocytes. Cholangiocyte dysfunction by viral infection as well as by other causes like the drugs used for treatment or the systemic inflammatory response induced by pneumonias could lead to liver injury. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Gamma Glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), as cholangiocytes injury markers, increased in some patients with COVID-19, supporting the role of cholangiocytes dysfunction in liver injury in these patients (Alqahtani and Schattenberg 2020; Marjot et al., 2021). Recently, Zhao et al. created a human liver ductal hepatocyte organoid model that was permissible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication. They observed that SARS-CoV-2-infected cholangiocytes directly impaired their barriers and bile acid transporting functions that resulted in hepatobiliary injury, confirming the strong role of cholangiocytes in the liver injury induced by SRAS-CoV-2 (Marjot et al., 2021).
Apart from the specific role of ACE-2 receptors, additional receptors have been found to play roles in virus entry. One of these receptors is the high-density lipoprotein Scavenger Receptor B-type 1 (SR-B1), which has been reported to help facilitate ACE2-dependent coronavirus attachment in vitro, reminiscent of hepatitis C virus infection. In addition, treatments targeting SR-B1 decrease the lipoprotein-mediated increment of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Wei et al., 2020).
In the second possible mechanism of liver injury, hypoxia may occur in hepatocytes following severe lung damage with SARS-CoV-2 infection, leading to an increased expression of ACE2 receptors and Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs). HIFs are one of the factors involved in hepatocyte metabolism whose increase can result in hepatic steatosis and liver injury (Li et al., 2021).
The third possible mechanism can be Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI). Many drugs are currently used to treat patients with COVID-19, some of which may have side effects on the liver, leading to hepatocyte toxicity (Li et al., 2021). As an instance, Cai et al. disclosed that the use of lopinavir/ritonavir compounds significantly caused liver damage (Cai et al., 2020), suggesting the need for paying more attention to this drug.
Cytokine storm may be the next possible mechanism of liver injury (Alqahtani and Schattenberg 2020; Ahmed and Ahmed 2021). Cytokine storm involves the initiation of an immune response cascade due to a severe inflammatory response after COVID-19 infection. Elevated inflammatory markers such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, IL-6, IL-2, and serum ferritin lead to cytokine storms in patients with severe COVID-19, which can be followed by the sudden deterioration of the condition towards multi-organ failure and severe liver injury.
Another suggested pathway is aggravated liver damage in patients with NAFLD. Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 (MCP-1), also called C-C chemokine motif ligand 2 (CCL-2), was enhanced after SARS-CoV-2 infection, which aggravated steatohepatitis (Xie et al., 2016). IL-6, as the most important cytokine in the cytokine storm, also enhanced significantly in individuals with fatty liver, which could activate the innate immune response in the liver and promote the progression of liver failure (Portincasa et al., 2020b). Overall, studies have demonstrated that the upregulation of MCP-1 in COVID-19 might aggravate the progression from NAFLD to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Gao and Tsukamoto 2016). Hence, COVID-19 might accelerate the progression of MAFLD (Portincasa et al., 2020a; Prins and Olinga 2020). In patients suffering from severe COVID-19, a reduction was observed in visceral and peripheral blood flow, which led to hypoxia in hepatocytes (Dunn et al., 1973). Then, HIFs could further worsen MAFLD (Chen et al., 2019; Gonzalez et al., 2019). Considering the close association between COVID-19 and MAFLD, patient management is necessary during the pandemic. Lifestyle modifications such as weight loss and nutritional training may mitigate the chance and severity of COVID-19 infection and decelerate the progress of liver damage. Therefore, timely and standard diagnosis and treatment for patients with MAFLD and COVID-19 should be taken into account.
Conclusion
Based on the recent studies, the effects of SARS-COV-2 are not limited to the respiratory system, and the disease may involve a wide range of organs. In this regard, ACE2 receptors play a critical role. The coronavirus can affect the organs involved in metabolic disorders including pancreas, liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract through these receptors. Subsequent to the blocking of ACE2 receptors by SARS-COV-2, a cascade of molecular pathways occurs that possibly leads to metabolic instability and the metabolic disturbance syndrome in patients as well as in recovered individuals (Chen Juan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). Therefore, patient management in terms of preventing the involvement of these organs by disrupting the pathogenesis of the virus can prevent further complications.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ms. A. Keivanshekouh at the Research Consultation Center (RCC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for her invaluable assistance in editing this manuscript.
References
Ahmed, M., and Ahmed, M. H. (2021). Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and COVID-19: An Epidemic that Begets Pandemic. World J. Clin. Cases 9 (17), 4133–4142. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i17.4133
Alqahtani, S. A., and Schattenberg, J. M. (2020). Liver Injury in COVID‐19: The Current Evidence. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 8 (5), 509–519. doi:10.1177/2050640620924157
Andrade Silva, M., da Silva, A. R. P. A., do Amaral, M. A., Fragas, M. G., and Câmara, N. O. S. (2021a). Metabolic Alterations in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and its Implication in Kidney Dysfunction. Front. Physiol. 12, 147. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.624698
Andrade Silva, M., da Silva, A. R. P. A., do Amaral, M. A., Fragas, M. G., and Câmara, N. O. S. (2021b). Metabolic Alterations in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and its Implication in Kidney Dysfunction. Front. Physiol. 12, 624698. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.624698
Andrade-Silva, M., Cenedeze, M. A., Perandini, L. A., Felizardo, R. J. F., Watanabe, I. K. M., Agudelo, J. S. H., et al. (2018). TLR2 and TLR4 Play Opposite Role in Autophagy Associated with Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Clin. Sci. 132 (16), 1725–1739. doi:10.1042/cs20170262
Balachandar, V., Mahalaxmi, I., Subramaniam, M., Kaavya, J., Senthil Kumar, N., Laldinmawii, G., et al. (2020). Follow-up Studies in COVID-19 Recovered Patients-Is it Mandatory. Sci. Total Environ. 729, 139021. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139021
Bergman, B. C., Horning, M. A., Casazza, G. A., Wolfel, E. E., Butterfield, G. E., and Brooks, G. A. (2000). Endurance Training Increases Gluconeogenesis during Rest and Exercise in Men. Am. J. Physiology-Endocrinology Metab. 278 (2), E244–E251. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.2000.278.2.e244
Cai, Q., Huang, D., Yu, H., Zhu, Z., Xia, Z., Su, Y., et al. (2020). COVID-19: Abnormal Liver Function Tests. J. Hepatol. 73 (3), 566–574. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.006
Cardamone, C., and Donatiello, I. (2020). Management of COVID-19 in Comorbidities. Ital. J. Med. 14 (4), 223–227. doi:10.4081/itjm.2020.1406
Chai, X., Hu, L., Zhang, Y., Han, W., Lu, Z., Aiwu, K., et al. (2020). Specific ACE2 Expression in Cholangiocytes May Cause Liver Damage after 2019-nCoV Infection. biorxiv. 1. 1. doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.931766
Chen, J., Chen, J., Fu, H., Li, Y., Wang, L., Luo, S., et al. (2019). Hypoxia Exacerbates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease via the HIF-2α/PPARα Pathway. Am. J. Physiology-Endocrinology Metab. 317 (4), E710–E722. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00052.2019
Chen, J., Wu, C., Wang, X., Yu, J., and Sun, Z. (2020a). The Impact of COVID-19 on Blood Glucose: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 11, 574541. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.574541
Chen, L., Lan, L., Han, Y., Lv, B., Zou, S., and Qian, Y. (2020b). Tong-fu-li-fei Decoction Exerts a Protective Effect on Intestinal Barrier of Sepsis in Rats through Upregulating ZO-1/occludin/claudin-1 Expression. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 143 (2), 89–96. doi:10.1016/j.jphs.2020.02.009
Cheng, Y., Luo, R., Wang, K., Zhang, M., Wang, Z., Dong, L., et al. (2020). Kidney Disease Is Associated with In-Hospital Death of Patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 97 (5), 829–838. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.005
Choudhury, A., and Mukherjee, S. (2020). In Silico studies on the Comparative Characterization of the Interactions of SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike Glycoprotein with ACE‐2 Receptor Homologs and Human TLRs. J. Med. Virol. 92 (10), 2105–2113. doi:10.1002/jmv.25987
Culleton, B. F., Larson, M. G., Wilson, P. W. F., Evans, J. C., Parfrey, P. S., and Levy, D. (1999). Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in a Community-Based Cohort with Mild Renal Insufficiency. Kidney Int. 56 (6), 2214–2219. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00773.x
Cure, E., and Cumhur Cure, M. (2020a). COVID-19 May Affect the Endocrine Pancreas by Activating Na+/H+ Exchanger 2 and Increasing Lactate Levels. J. Endocrinological Invest. 43, 1167–1168. doi:10.1007/s40618-020-01307-4
Cure, E., and Cumhur Cure, M. (2020b). Can Dapagliflozin Have a Protective Effect against COVID-19 Infection? A Hypothesis. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 14 (4), 405–406. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.024
Davis, B. K., Wen, H., and Ting, J. P-Y. (2011). The Inflammasome NLRs in Immunity, Inflammation, and Associated Diseases. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29, 707–735. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101405
de-Madaria, E., Siau, K., and Cárdenas-Jaén, K. (2020). Increased Amylase and Lipase in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia: Don’t Blame the Pancreas Just yet. Gastroenterology 160 (5), 1871. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.044
Deisl, C., Simonin, A., Anderegg, M., Albano, G., Kovacs, G., Ackermann, D., et al. (2013). Sodium/hydrogen Exchanger NHA2 Is Critical for Insulin Secretion in β-cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 (24), 10004–10009. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220009110
Diao, B., Wang, C., Wang, R., Feng, Z., Tan, Y., Wang, H., et al. (2020). Human Kidney Is a Target for Novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection. medRxiv. 1. 1. doi:10.1101/2020.03.04.20031120
Ding, S., and Liang, T. J. (2020). Is SARS-CoV-2 Also an Enteric Pathogen with Potential Fecal–Oral Transmission? A COVID-19 Virological and Clinical Review. Gastroenterology 159 (1), 53–61. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.052
Duckworth, W. C., Bennett, R. G., and Hamel, F. G. (1998). Insulin Degradation: Progress and Potential. Endocr. Rev. 19 (5), 608–624. doi:10.1210/edrv.19.5.0349
Dunn, G. D., Hayes, P., Breen, K. J., and Schenker, S. (1973). The Liver in Congestive Heart Failure: a Review. Am. J. Med. Sci. 265 (3), 174–190. doi:10.1097/00000441-197303000-00001
Eckel, R. H., Grundy, S. M., and Zimmet, P. Z. (2005). The Metabolic Syndrome. The Lancet 365 (9468), 1415–1428. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66378-7
El-Achkar, T. M., Ohmit, S. E., McCullough, P. A., Crook, E. D., Brown, W. W., Grimm, R., et al. (2005). Higher Prevalence of Anemia with Diabetes Mellitus in Moderate Kidney Insufficiency: The Kidney Early Evaluation Program. Kidney Int. 67 (4), 1483–1488. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00226.x
El-Huneidi, W., Hamad, M., and Taneera, J. (2021). Expression of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor “ACE2” in Human Pancreatic β Cells: to Be or Not to Be. Islets 13, 106–114. doi:10.1080/19382014.2021.1954458
Emhoff, C.-A. W., Messonnier, L. A., Horning, M. A., Fattor, J. A., Carlson, T. J., and Brooks, G. A. (2013). Gluconeogenesis and Hepatic Glycogenolysis during Exercise at the Lactate Threshold. J. Appl. Physiol. 114 (3), 297–306. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01202.2012
Fändriks, L. (2017). Roles of the Gut in the Metabolic Syndrome: an Overview. J. Intern. Med. 281 (4), 319–336. doi:10.1111/joim.12584
Fernández-Blanco, J. A., Estévez, J., Shea-Donohue, T., Martínez, V., and Vergara, P. (2015). Changes in Epithelial Barrier Function in Response to Parasitic Infection: Implications for IBD Pathogenesis. J. Crohn's Colitis 9 (6), 463–476. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv056
Festi, D., Schiumerini, R., Eusebi, L. H., Marasco, G., Taddia, M., and Colecchia, A. (2014). Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Syndrome. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 20 (43), 16079. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16079
Freeman, T. L., and Swartz, T. H. (2020). Targeting the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Severe COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 11 (1518). doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01518
Gao, B., and Tsukamoto, H. (2016). Inflammation in Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Friend or Foe. Gastroenterology 150 (8), 1704–1709. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.025
Garla, V., Yanes-Cardozo, L., and Lien, L. F. (2017). Current Therapeutic Approaches in the Management of Hyperglycemia in Chronic Renal Disease. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 18 (1), 5–19. doi:10.1007/s11154-017-9416-1
Garvin, M. R., Alvarez, C., Miller, J. I., Prates, E. T., Walker, A. M., Amos, B. K., et al. (2020). A Mechanistic Model and Therapeutic Interventions for COVID-19 Involving a RAS-Mediated Bradykinin Storm. Elife 9, e59177. doi:10.7554/eLife.59177
Godoy-Matos, A. F., Silva Júnior, W. S., and Valerio, C. M. (2020). NAFLD as a Continuum: from Obesity to Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes. Diabetology Metab. Syndr. 12 (1), 1–20. doi:10.1186/s13098-020-00570-y
Gonzalez, F. J., Xie, C., and Jiang, C. (2019). The Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors in Metabolic Diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 15 (1), 21–32. doi:10.1038/s41574-018-0096-z
Gu, J., and Korteweg, C. (2007). Pathology and Pathogenesis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Am. J. Pathol. 170 (4), 1136–1147. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2007.061088
Gupta, R., Ghosh, A., Singh, A. K., and Misra, A. (2020). Clinical Considerations for Patients with Diabetes in Times of COVID-19 Epidemic. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 14 (3), 211. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.002
Gupta, S., Coca, S. G., Chan, L., Melamed, M. L., Brenner, S. K., Salim S, H., et al. (2021). AKI Treated with Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 32 (1), 161–176. doi:10.1681/asn.2020060897
Haschke, M., Schuster, M., Poglitsch, M., Loibner, H., Salzberg, M., Bruggisser, M., et al. (2013). Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Recombinant Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Healthy Human Subjects. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 52 (9), 783–792. doi:10.1007/s40262-013-0072-7
Hashimoto, T., Perlot, T., Rehman, A., Trichereau, J., Ishiguro, H., Paolino, M., et al. (2012). ACE2 Links Amino Acid Malnutrition to Microbial Ecology and Intestinal Inflammation. Nature 487 (7408), 477–481. doi:10.1038/nature11228
He, L., Ding, Y., Zhang, Q., Che, X., He, Y., Shen, H., et al. (2006). Expression of Elevated Levels of Pro‐inflammatory Cytokines in SARS‐CoV‐infected ACE2+ Cells in SARS Patients: Relation to the Acute Lung Injury and Pathogenesis of SARS. The J. Pathol. A J. Pathological Soc. Great Britain Ireland 210 (3), 288–297. doi:10.1002/path.2067
Holmes, E., Wist, J., Masuda, R., Lodge, S., Nitschke, P., Kimhofer, T., et al. (2021). Incomplete Systemic Recovery and Metabolic Phenoreversion in Post-Acute-Phase Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Implications for Assessment of Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome. J. Proteome Res. 20 (6), 3315–3329. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00224
Huentelman, M. J., Zubcevic, J., Hernandez Prada, J. A., Xiao, X., Dimitrov, D. S., Raizada, M. K., et al. (2004). Structure-based Discovery of a Novel Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Inhibitor. Hypertension 44 (6), 903–906. doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000146120.29648.36
Hunt, R. H., East, J. E., Lanas, A., Malfertheiner, P., Satsangi, J., Scarpignato, C., et al. (2021). COVID-19 and Gastrointestinal Disease: Implications for the Gastroenterologist. Dig. Dis. 39 (2), 119–139. doi:10.1159/000512152
Hur, K. Y., and Lee, M.-S. (2015). Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Disorders. Diabetes Metab. J. 39 (3), 198–203. doi:10.4093/dmj.2015.39.3.198
Jager, K. J., Kramer, A., Chesnaye, N. C., Couchoud, C., Sánchez-Álvarez, J. E., Garneata, L., et al. (2020). Results from the ERA-EDTA Registry Indicate a High Mortality Due to COVID-19 in Dialysis Patients and Kidney Transplant Recipients across Europe. Kidney Int. 98 (6), 1540–1548. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.09.006
Jia, H. P., Look, D. C., Tan, P., Shi, L., Hickey, M., Gakhar, L., et al. (2009). Ectodomain Shedding of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 in Human Airway Epithelia. Am. J. Physiology-Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 297 (1), L84–L96. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00071.2009
Jia, H., Neptune, E., and Cui, H. (2021). Targeting ACE2 for COVID-19 Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges. Am. J. Respir. Cel. Mol. Biol. 64 (4), 416–425. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2020-0322ps
Lancet (2013). The MERS-CoV: A Global challenge. Lancet (London, England) 381 (9882), 1960. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61184-8
Lauterbach, M. A., Hanke, J. E., Serefidou, M., Mangan, M. S. J., Kolbe, C.-C., Hess, T., et al. (2019). Toll-like Receptor Signaling Rewires Macrophage Metabolism and Promotes Histone Acetylation via ATP-Citrate Lyase. Immunity 51 (6), 997–1011. e7. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.009
Lee, C. C. E., Ali, K., Connell, D., Mordi, I. R., George, J., Lang, E. M. S. L., et al. (2021). COVID-19-associated Cardiovascular Complications. Diseases 9 (3), 47. doi:10.3390/diseases9030047
Legouis, D., Ricksten, S.-E., Faivre, A., Verissimo, T., Gariani, K., Verney, C., et al. (2020). Altered Proximal Tubular Cell Glucose Metabolism during Acute Kidney Injury Is Associated with Mortality. Nat. Metab. 2 (8), 732–743. doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0238-1
Li, F., Li, W., Farzan, M., and Harrison, S. C. (2005). Structure of SARS Coronavirus Spike Receptor-Binding Domain Complexed with Receptor. Science 309 (5742), 1864–1868. doi:10.1126/science.1116480
Li, J., Guo, T., Dong, D., Zhang, X., Chen, X., Feng, Y., et al. (2020b). Defining Heart Disease Risk for Death in COVID-19 Infection. QJM: Int. J. Med. 113 (12), 876–882. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa246
Li, L., Tang, W., and Fan, Y. (2019). Role of Inflammasome in Chronic Kidney Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1165, 407–421. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_19
Li, R., Tang, Y., Liang, M., and Ding, J. (2021). Liver Injury in COVID-19 Patients with Metabolic Syndrome-A Narrative Review. Ann. Palliat. Med. 10 (7), 8264–8270. doi:10.21037/apm-21-1398
Lili, C., Kumardeep, C., Saha, A., Chauhan, K., Akhil, V., and Zhao, S. (2020). AKI in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19. JASN 31 (9), 2145–2157. doi:10.1681/ASN.2020050615
Liu, F., Long, X., Zhang, B., Zhang, W., Chen, X., and Zhang, Z. (2020). ACE2 Expression in Pancreas May Cause Pancreatic Damage after SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18 (9), 2128. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.040
Marjot, T., Webb, G. J., Barritt, A. S., Moon, A. M., Stamataki, Z., Wong, V. W., et al. (2021). COVID-19 and Liver Disease: Mechanistic and Clinical Perspectives. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18 (5), 348–364. doi:10.1038/s41575-021-00426-4
Martinon, F., Mayor, A., and Tschopp, J. (2009). The Inflammasomes: Guardians of the Body. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 229–265. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132715
Mather, A., and Pollock, C. (2011). Glucose Handling by the Kidney. Kidney Int. 79, S1–S6. doi:10.1038/ki.2010.509
Mönkemüller, K., Fry, L., and Rickes, S. (2020). COVID-19, Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 and the Small Bowel. Rev. Esp Enferm Dig. 112 (5), 383–388. doi:10.17235/reed.2020.7137/2020
Morens, D. M., Folkers, G. K., and Fauci, A. S. (2004). The challenge of Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases. Nature 430 (6996), 242–249. doi:10.1038/nature02759
Nalbandian, A., Sehgal, K., Gupta, A., Madhavan, M. V., McGroder, C., Stevens, J. S., et al. (2021). Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome. Nat. Med. 27 (4), 601–615. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
Ng, J. H., Hirsch, J. S., Hazzan, A., Wanchoo, R., Shah, H. H., Malieckal, D. A., et al. (2021). Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 and Acute Kidney Injury. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 77 (2), 204–215. e1. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.09.002
Pan, X.-W., Xu, D., Zhang, H., Zhou, W., Wang, L.-h., and Cui, X.-G. (2020). Identification of a Potential Mechanism of Acute Kidney Injury during the COVID-19 Outbreak: a Study Based on Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis. Intensive Care Med. 46 (6), 1114–1116. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06026-1
Peralta, C. A., Kurella, M., Lo, J. C., and Chertow, G. M. (2006). The Metabolic Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 15 (4), 361–365. doi:10.1097/01.mnh.0000232875.27846.7e
Perico, L., Benigni, A., and Remuzzi, G. (2020). Should COVID-19 Concern Nephrologists? Why and to what Extent? the Emerging Impasse of Angiotensin Blockade. Nephron 144 (5), 213–221. doi:10.1159/000507305
Perrin-Cocon, L., Aublin-Gex, A., Diaz, O., Ramière, C., Peri, F., André, P., et al. (2018). Toll-like Receptor 4–induced Glycolytic Burst in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Results from P38-dependent Stabilization of HIF-1α and Increased Hexokinase II Expression. J. Immunol. 201 (5), 1510–1521. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1701522
Portincasa, P., Krawczyk, M., Machill, A., Lammert, F., and Di Ciaula, A. (2020a). Hepatic Consequences of COVID-19 Infection. Lapping or Biting. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 77, 18–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2020.05.035
Portincasa, P., Krawczyk, M., Smyk, W., Lammert, F., and Di Ciaula, A. (2020b). COVID‐19 and Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Two Intersecting Pandemics. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50 (10), e13338. doi:10.1111/eci.13338
Prasad, N., and Patel, M. R. (2018). Infection-Induced Kidney Diseases. Front. Med. 5, 327. doi:10.3389/fmed.2018.00327
Prins, G. H., and Olinga, P. (2020). Potential Implications of COVID‐19 in Non‐alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Liver Int. 40 (10), 2568. doi:10.1111/liv.14484
Qi, F., Qian, S., Zhang, S., and Zhang, Z. (2020). Single Cell RNA Sequencing of 13 Human Tissues Identify Cell Types and Receptors of Human Coronaviruses. Biochem. biophysical Res. Commun. 526 (1), 135–140. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.044
Qing, H., Li, Z., Yang, Z., Shi, M., Huang, Z., Song, J., et al. (2020). The Possibility of COVID‐19 Transmission from Eye to Nose. Acta Ophthalmologica 98 (3), e388. doi:10.1111/aos.14412
Rabb, H. (2020). Kidney Diseases in the Time of COVID-19: Major Challenges to Patient Care. J. Clin. Invest. 130 (6), 2749–2751. doi:10.1172/jci138871
Rabkin, R., Ryan, M. P., and Duckworth, W. C. (1984). The Renal Metabolism of Insulin. Diabetologia 27 (3), 351–357. doi:10.1007/bf00304849
Ratajczak, M. Z., and Kucia, M. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Overactivation of Nlrp3 Inflammasome as a Trigger of Cytokine “Storm” and Risk Factor for Damage of Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Leukemia 34 (7), 1726–1729. doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0887-9
Ridruejo, E., and Soza, A. (2020). The Liver in Times of COVID-19: What Hepatologists Should Know. Ann. Hepatol. 19 (4), 353–358. doi:10.1016/j.aohep.2020.05.001
Ros, U., Pedrera, L., and Garcia-Saez, A. J. (2020). Partners in Crime: the Interplay of Proteins and Membranes in Regulated Necrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (7), 2412. doi:10.3390/ijms21072412
Rosselli, M., Lotersztajn, S., Vizzutti, F., Arena, U., Pinzani, M., and Marra, F. (2014). The Metabolic Syndrome and Chronic Liver Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 20 (31), 5010–5024. doi:10.2174/1381612819666131206111352
Rubino, F., Amiel, S. A., Zimmet, P., Alberti, G., Bornstein, S., Eckel, R. H., et al. (2020). New-onset Diabetes in Covid-19. New Engl. J. Med. 383 (8), 789–790. doi:10.1056/nejmc2018688
Santos-Marcos, J. A., Perez-Jimenez, F., and Camargo, A. (2019). The Role of Diet and Intestinal Microbiota in the Development of Metabolic Syndrome. J. Nutr. Biochem. 70, 1–27. doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.03.017
Sathish, T., Anton, M. C., and Sivakumar, T. (2021). New‐onset Diabetes in “Long COVID”. J. Diabetes 13 (8), 693. doi:10.1111/1753-0407.13187
Schlosser, F., Maier, B. F., Jack, O., Hinrichs, D., Zachariae, A., and Brockmann, D. (2020). COVID-19 Lockdown Induces Disease-Mitigating Structural Changes in Mobility Networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117 (52), 32883–32890. doi:10.1073/pnas.2012326117
Schroder, Kate., Zhou, Rongbin., and Tschopp, Jurg. (2010). The NLRP3 Inflammasome: a Sensor for Metabolic Danger. Science 327 (5963), 296–300. doi:10.1126/science.1184003
Sharma, P., Uppal, N. N., Wanchoo, R., Shah, H. H., Yang, Y., Parikh, R., et al. (2020). COVID-19–associated Kidney Injury: a Case Series of Kidney Biopsy Findings. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 31 (9), 1948–1958. doi:10.1681/asn.2020050699
Shen, L. W., Mao, H. J., Wu, Y. L., Tanaka, Y., and Zhang, W. (2017). TMPRSS2: A Potential Target for Treatment of Influenza Virus and Coronavirus Infections. Biochimie 142, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2017.07.016
Singh, A. K., Gupta, R., Ghosh, A., and Misra, A. (2020). Diabetes in COVID-19: Prevalence, Pathophysiology, Prognosis and Practical Considerations. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 14 (4), 303–310. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.004
Touret, F., Gilles, M., Barral, K., Nougairède, A., van Helden, J., Decroly, E., et al. (2020). In Vitro screening of a FDA Approved Chemical Library Reveals Potential Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Replication. Scientific Rep. 10 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70143-6
Tratner, I. (2003). SRAS: 1. Le Virus. M/S: médecine Sci. 19 (8-9), 885–891. doi:10.1051/medsci/20031989885
van den Berg, D. F., and Te Velde, A. A. (2020). Severe COVID-19: NLRP3 Inflammasome Dysregulated. Front. Immunol. 11, 1580. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01580
Wei, C., Wan, L., Yan, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Yang, X., et al. (2020). HDL-scavenger Receptor B Type 1 Facilitates SARS-CoV-2 Entry. Nat. Metab. 2 (12), 1391–1400. doi:10.1038/s42255-020-00324-0
Wu, N., Yao, Q., Chen, S., Yu, C., Xu, Y., Zhao, J., et al. (2021). Association between Metabolic Syndrome and Incident Chronic Kidney Disease Among Chinese: A Nation‐wide Cohort Study and Updated Meta‐analysis. Diabetes/Metabolism Res. Rev. 37 (7), e3437. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3437
Xiao, F., Tang, M., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., and Shan, H. (2020). Evidence for Gastrointestinal Infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology 158 (6), 1831–1833. e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055
Xie, J., Yang, L., Tian, L., Li, W., Yang, L., and Li, L. (2016). Macrophage Migration Inhibitor Factor Upregulates MCP-1 Expression in an Autocrine Manner in Hepatocytes during Acute Mouse Liver Injury. Scientific Rep. 6 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1038/srep27665
Yan, Q., Song, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, Z., Yang, C., Liu, S., et al. (2018). Autophagy Activation Contributes to Lipid Accumulation in Tubular Epithelial Cells during Kidney Fibrosis. Cel. Death Discov. 4 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1038/s41420-018-0065-2
Yu, D., Du, Q., Yan, S., Guo, X.-G., He, Y., Zhu, G., et al. (2021). Liver Injury in COVID-19: Clinical Features and Treatment Management. Virol. J. 18 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1186/s12985-021-01593-1
Zafar, U., Khaliq, S., Ahmad, H. U., Manzoor, S., and Lone, K. P. (2018). Metabolic Syndrome: an Update on Diagnostic Criteria, Pathogenesis, and Genetic Links. Hormones 17 (3), 299–313. doi:10.1007/s42000-018-0051-3
Zhang, H., Kang, Z., Gong, H., Xu, D., Wang, J., Li, Z., et al. (2020). Digestive System Is a Potential Route of COVID-19: an Analysis of Single-Cell Coexpression Pattern of Key Proteins in Viral Entry Process. Gut 69 (6), 1010–1018. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320953
Keywords: COVID-19, recovered, susceptibility, metabolic diseases, molecular mechanisms
Citation: Kaviani M, Keshtkar S, Soleimanian S, Sabet Sarvestani F, Azarpira N and Pakbaz S (2022) Susceptibility to Metabolic Diseases in COVID-19: To be or Not to be an Issue. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9:803314. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.803314
Received: 27 October 2021; Accepted: 05 January 2022;
Published: 03 February 2022.
Edited by:
Rana Jahanban-Esfahlan, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, IranReviewed by:
Adel Abdel Moneim, Beni-Suef University, EgyptSerena Del Turco, Institute of Clinical Physiology (CNR), Italy
Copyright © 2022 Kaviani, Keshtkar, Soleimanian, Sabet Sarvestani, Azarpira and Pakbaz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Negar Azarpira, negarazarpira@gmail.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work