Impact Factor 3.582

The world's most-cited Neurosciences journals

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Aging Neurosci. | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00377

Visual-Somatosensory Integration and Quantitative Gait Performance in Aging

  • 1Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  • 2Montefiore Medical Center, United States

Background: The ability to integrate information across sensory modalities is an integral aspect of mobility. Yet, the association between visual-somatosensory (VS) integration and gait performance has not been well-established in aging.

Methods: A total of 333 healthy older adults (mean age 76.53 ± 6.22; 53% female) participated in a visual-somatosensory simple reaction time task and underwent quantitative gait assessment using an instrumented walkway. Magnitude of VS integration was assessed using probability models, and then categorized into four integration classifications (superior, good, poor or deficient). Associations of VS integration with three independent gait factors (Pace, Rhythm and Variability derived by factor analysis method) were tested at cross-section using hierarchal regression analyses. Given overlaps in neural circuitry necessary for both multisensory integration and goal-directed locomotion, we hypothesized that VS integration would be significantly associated with pace but not rhythm which is a more automatic process controlled mainly through brainstem and spinal networks.

Results: In keeping with our hypothesis, magnitude of VS integration was a strong predictor of pace (β = 0.12, p < 0.05) but not rhythm (β = -0.01, p = 0.83) in fully-adjusted models. While there was a trend for the association of magnitude of VS integration with variability (β = -0.11, p = 0.051), post-hoc testing of individual gait variables that loaded highest on the variability factor revealed that stride length variability (β = -0.13, p = 0.03) and not swing time variability (β = -0.08, p = 0.15) was significantly associated with magnitude of VS integration. Of the cohort, 29% had superior, 26% had good, 29% had poor, and 16% had deficient VS integration effects.

Conclusions: Worse VS integration in aging is associated with worse spatial but not temporal aspects of gait performance.

Keywords: multisensory processing, sensorimotor integration, Gait, Aging, falls

Received: 24 Sep 2018; Accepted: 30 Oct 2018.

Edited by:

Paolo Cavallari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy

Reviewed by:

Matthieu P. Boisgontier, University of British Columbia, Canada
Enrico Mossello, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy  

Copyright: © 2018 Mahoney and Verghese. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Jeannette R. Mahoney, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, United States, jeannette.mahoney@einstein.yu.edu