Effects of Aerobic Exercise and Mind-Body Exercise in Parkinson’s Disease: A Mixed-Treatment Comparison Analysis

Introduction

According to epidemiological studies of Parkinson’s disease (PD), the global PD population reached approximately 6,100,000 in 2016 (Collaborators, 2018, 2019), making it the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. PD affects the motor and non-motor systems, resulting in poor quality of life for patients and a heavy burden on families and society. There is no curative treatment for PD, which poses a great challenge for global health systems that needs to be resolved.

Although pharmacotherapy is currently still the first-line treatment, side effects and response fluctuations limit its application (Connolly and Lang, 2014; Ellis and Fell, 2017; Stoker and Barker, 2020). The latest guideline (Canadian guideline for Parkinson’s disease) and studies have indicated that physical exercise, especially aerobic and mind-body exercise, are vital for improving motor and non-motor functional performance and delaying the progression of PD (Ahlskog, 2018; Schenkman et al., 2018; Grimes et al., 2019; van der Kolk et al., 2019; Deuel and Seeberger, 2020). Previous meta-analyses have demonstrated that these types of exercise may be beneficial for maintaining brain health, promoting functional mobility performance, psychosocial function and quality of life (Shu et al., 2014; Kwok et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2020; Schootemeijer et al., 2020). Moreover, these types of exercise might exert positive effect on cognitive function and wellbeing by enhancing cerebrovascular angiogenesis and regulating the brain plasticity (da Silva et al., 2018; Mandolesi et al., 2018; Pianta et al., 2019). However, aerobic exercise and mind-body exercise includes various types of exercise, such as treadmill exercise, walking, cycling, dance, tai chi and yoga. Combining different interventions when conducting a meta-analysis may induce confounding factors. Moreover, evidence-based recommendations on which type of exercise is most suitable for each individual are still lacking. Therefore, systematically determining the most effective treatment options for particular signs and symptoms from among all available types of aerobic exercise and mind-body exercise is critical to providing individual evidence-based recommendations for PD patients.

Network meta-analysis is a technique that uses direct and indirect results to compare multiple interventions simultaneously and estimates the rank order of the treatments, providing evidence-based recommendations for assisting medical decision making (Rouse et al., 2017; Dias and Caldwell, 2019). Therefore, in this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of aerobic and mind-body exercise on motor function, functional mobility, psychosocial status and activities of daily living. Furthermore, we also explored the rankings of different exercise treatments and provided evidence-based recommendations for patients with PD under different situations.

Materials and Methods

Study Registration

This network-meta analysis was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with a record number CRD42021224823.

Search Strategy

The electronic databases Medline, Embase (all via Ovid), and the Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant citations published from inception through April 3, 2020. We used various combinations of medical subject headings and free terms, which included Parkinson’s disease, aerobic and mind-body exercise (a list of relevant exercise interventions), and randomized clinical trial designs (search strategies are listed in Supplementary 1).

Selection and Exclusion Criteria

Eligible studies were included when they met the following criteria: (1). All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). (2) The population of the included studies was adult patients diagnosed with PD. (3) Interventions contained at least one of the following exercises: treadmill exercise, walking, cycling, dance, yoga, and tai chi. The control group received usual care, was a waitlist control or performed other non-aerobic and non-mind-body exercise. (4) Outcomes of the studies included at least one of the following measurements: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score [UPDRS or Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale scores (MDS-UPDRS)], Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score, Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) score, psychosocial outcomes (depressive scale: BDI, HADS-depression; cognitive functional scale: DRS, MMSE, MoCA, PDQ39-cognition, and UPDRS-mental) and activities of daily living (ADL) (UPDRS-ADL, PDQ39-ADL).

Studies were excluded if insufficient data or information concerning assessment was provided. We also excluded quasi-RCTs, animal trials, clinical protocols, conference abstracts, case reports and systematic reviews.

Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two investigators (YX & HG) independently extracted the relevant data and information from the eligible studies. Basic information about the study characteristics (first author, year, design), population, interventions and comparisons (duration, frequency, length), and measurement outcomes was extracted. Another two reviewers (CW & CT) evaluated the quality of the included studies based on the standard criteria of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (Savovic et al., 2014). Any disagreements that existed were resolved through discussion. If necessary, a senior investigator (MZ) was consulted to achieve a consensus.

Outcomes

The outcomes of this network meta-analysis were listed as follow:

Primary Outcome

Motor outcomes: UPDRS-motor score [assessed by UPDRS III and MDS-UPDRS III, UPDRS III were converted to MDS-UPDRS III by adding 7 points according to the validated calibration method (Hentz et al., 2015)]; BBS and TUG outcomes.

Non-motor outcomes: Psychosocial outcomes (depressive and cognitive functional scale scores) and ADL.

Secondary Outcome

Safety outcomes: Non-serious and serious adverse events.

Statistical Analysis

We performed a pairwise meta-analysis first. All variables were continuous data and presented as mean with standard deviation (SD). Mean differences (MD = Absolute difference between the mean value in two groups, defined as the difference in means between treatment and control group and was calculated using the same scale) or standardized mean differences (SMD = Difference in mean outcome between groups/Standard deviation of outcome among participants, which was used to combine data when trials with different scale) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported as a continuous outcome (Borenstein et al., 2010; Cumpston et al., 2019). We assessed heterogeneity by testing the I² statistic. If statistically quantifiable heterogeneity existed, a random-effects model was fitted. Otherwise, we used a fixed-effect model (Borenstein et al., 2010).

Then, we conducted a network meta-analysis for each outcome using a frequentist approach and the netmeta command in Stata version 14 (Shim et al., 2017). We quantified potential inconsistencies between the direct and indirect results by using network side-split analysis and a design-by-treatment interaction model (Dias et al., 2010; White et al., 2012). If the p-value of the design-by-treatment interaction model and the network side-split analysis exceeded 5%, a consistency model was used to evaluate the effect size of the multiple treatment comparisons.

We estimated the ranking probabilities of each treatment for different outcomes based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and mean ranking (Salanti et al., 2011). Moreover, to examine the stability of the result and evaluate whether the results were impacted by study characteristic, sensitivity analysis was conducted based on the baseline patient characteristics. We also explored the potential dose-response relationship using metaregression if the data of the included studies allowed it. To assess publication bias, we used the comparison-adjusted funnel plot to detect the risk of potential publication bias. If the effect size of the included studies was distributed symmetrically, which indicated that there was minimal publication bias in this network meta-analysis.

Results

Study Identification and Selection

We retrieved a total of 5,919 publications from the electronic databases and eliminated 1,592 duplicate publications. A total of 4,327 publications were left for screening according to their titles and abstracts. Of those, 4,095 publications were removed, and 232 remaining publications were then identified as potentially eligible studies and underwent a full-text review. Finally, fifty-two relevant publications were included in the network meta-analysis (Supplementary Figure 1).

Characteristics of the Included Studies

A total of 52 eligible RCTs with 1,971 patients diagnosed with PD were included in this network meta-analysis. The interventions of the included trials mainly included treadmill exercise, walking, cycling, dance, yoga, and tai chi. Most trials used usual care, waitlist or other non-aerobic exercise as the control. The duration of each intervention varied from 20 to 90 min per session, and the frequency ranged from one to five times per week. Forty-two RCTs assessed motor function using the UPDRS-motor score. Fourteen studies used the BBS to assess balance function. Twenty-three studies evaluated mobility function using the TUG test, twelve RCTs assessed depressive outcomes, 13 RCTs evaluated cognition, and 17 studies reported ADL outcomes (see Supplementary Table 1).

Quality Assessment of the Included Studies

Among the 52 RCTs, 65.38% had a low risk in terms of random sequence generation, and 63.46% reported the use of allocation concealment methods. Few studies (11.54%) used blinding methods for participants and personnel because exercise is a non-pharmacologic treatment. Forty studies (77.36%) reported a low risk for bias in terms of blinding the outcome assessment. RCTs (84.62%) had a low risk of attrition bias. Forty-two studies reported a low risk of reporting bias. Overall, 67.31% were deemed to have a low risk of poor methodological quality, whereas 17 studies were regarded as having poor methodological quality (Supplementary Figures 2,3).

Analysis of Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Motor Outcomes

Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-Motor

Forty-two RCTs with six different therapy categories assessed motor function using UPDRS III-motor measurements. Treadmill exercise contributed 18.8% to the network plot, walking 8.2%, cycling 4.7%, dance 9.4%, yoga 5.8%, tai chi 7%, and the control group 45.8% (Supplementary Figure 4A).

The pairwise meta-analysis illustrated that all therapies could decrease the overall UPDRS motor score. Those performing treadmill exercise, walking, dance, yoga, or tai chi all functioned better than those in the control group in terms of the UPDRS-motor score (Figure 1A).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Pairwise meta-analysis of aerobic and mind-body therapies on motor outcomes. (A) UPDRS-motor outcome. (B) TUG outcome. (C) BBS outcome. Meta-analysis results for pair-wise comparisons represented by MD and 95% credible interval (CrI).

Quantification of the inconsistencies between direct and indirect comparisons using node-splitting methods and the design-by-treatment interaction model showed that all p-values exceeded 0.05 (Supplementary Table 2), which indicated satisfactory consistency.

Network meta-analysis indicated that treadmill exercise [MD = –3.23,CI = (–4.80, –1.67)], walking [MD = –6.12, CI = (–8.62, –3.61)], dance [MD = –4.84, CI = (–7.45, –2.24)], yoga [MD = –8.07, CI = (–11.14, –5.00)], and tai chi [MD = –4.66, CI = (–7.10, –2.22)] were superior to the control in reducing the UPDRS-motor score. Yoga and walking were significantly more effective in decreasing UPDRS-motor scores than treadmill therapy (Figure 2A). The ranking probability of six different interventions illustrated that yoga (SUCRA:94.1%) ranked first for the UPDRS-motor score based on the SUCRA, followed by walking, dance, cycling, tai chi, and treadmill therapy (Figures 3A–C).

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Network meta-analysis of the efficacy of exercise therapies on motor outcomes. (A) UPDRS-motor outcome. (B) TUG outcome. (C) BBS outcome. MD and 95% credible interval (CrI) estimations were calculated as column-defining interventions compared with row-defining interventions. Significant results were labeled with bold, red and underlined.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. The rank probability of various interventions based on the SUCRA. (A–C) Rank probability and mean rank on UPDRS-motor outcome. (D–F) TUG outcome. (G–I) BBS outcome. The greater the SUCRA value is, the better the rank.

Dose-Response Analysis

Because yoga was ranked first for the UPDRS-motor score, we further analyzed the optimal dose of yoga therapy for improving motor function in PD patients. We analyzed the potential optimal time of yoga per session in UPDRS motor score. Our metaregression revealed that the effect size was not significantly increased with increasing yoga intervention time each session (p = 0.15 > 0.05, Figure 4A). The results showed that a duration of 60 min (each time) was the most suitable duration for reducing the UPDRS-motor score of PD patients (SUCRA: 98.2%, Figures 4B–D). Besides, the result also indicated that 2 times a week might be the most suitable frequency for reducing the UPDRS-motor score of PD patients (SUCRA: 98.2%, Figures 4E–H).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Dose response of yoga using meta-regression and SUCRA on UPDRS-motor outcome. (A–D) The potential optimal time of yoga per session in UPDRS motor scale; (E–H) The potential optimal frequency of yoga each week in UPDRS motor outcome. (A,E) Dose-response curve for yoga using metaregression. (B–D,F–H) Dose response of yoga based on the rank probability and mean rank. The greater the SUCRA value is, the better the rank.

Timed-Up-and-Go Test

The network plot of TUG outcome was shown in Supplementary Figure 4B. And the pairwise meta-analysis showed that compared with the control, yoga and tai chi therapies significantly decreased the TUG score. Overall therapies could reduce the TUG score (Figure 1B).

The consistency tests between the direct and indirect effects all indicated that the p-value exceeded 0.05 (Supplementary Table 2).

We conducted a network meta-analysis of TUG outcomes, and the results illustrated that yoga (MD = –2.77, CI = –4.68, –0.86), tai chi (MD = –1.13, CI = –1.92, –0.34), and treadmill exercise (MD = –1.61, CI = –2.91, –0.30) were more beneficial in reducing the TUG score than the control (Figure 2B). Moreover, we evaluated the rankings of the various treatments based on TUG scores and found that yoga ranked the highest (SUCRA: 92.6%), followed by treadmill exercise, tai chi, walking, cycling and dance (Figures 3D–F).

Berge Balance Scale

Fourteen studies including six treatments were included in the network meta-analysis evaluating BBS outcomes (Supplementary Figure 4C). Figure 1C shows that therapies could enhance the overall balance ability of PD patients. Walking, dance, yoga, and tai chi were highly effective in increasing balance ability.

The comparisons indicated satisfactory consistency (all, p > 0.05, Supplementary Table 2). The network comparison revealed that walking (MD = 7.16, CI = (2.26, 12.07), dance [MD = 5.18, CI = (1.53, 8.83)], and tai chi [MD = 4.15, CI = (0.92, 7.38)] were superior to the control in improving the BBS score (Figure 2C). The SUCRA indicated that walking had the highest rank for the BBS score (SUCRA: 90.2%), followed by dance, tai chi, and yoga (Figures 3G–I).

Clustered Ranking Plot of the Network

We constructed a clustered ranking plot of the network (UPDRS-motor and TUG, UPDRS-motor and BBS, and TUG and BBS) to comprehensively evaluate the most suitable treatment for improving motor function in PD. The results showed that the yoga, walking, dance, and tai chi groups had higher SUCRA values in the clustered ranking plot, which indicated that yoga and walking in particular, in addition to dance and tai chi, are the most suitable therapies for increasing overall motor function in PD patients (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Clustered ranking plot of the network. (A) For UPDRS-motor&TUG outcomes. (B) For UPDRS&BBS. (C) For TUG&BBS outcomes. The plots are based on cluster analyses of SUCRA values. Each plot shows the SUCRA values for two different outcomes. The therapies in the upper right corner are more effective than the other therapies.

Non-motor Outcomes

Depression Scale

Twelve studies with five treatments assessed depression scales (Supplementary Figure 4D). The pairwise meta-analysis showed that treadmill and yoga therapy significantly decreased depressive symptoms in the PD group compared with the control group (Supplementary Figure 5A).

All p-values exceeded 0.05 in the network side-split model, which revealed that the direct and indirect comparison outcomes were consistent (Supplementary Table 2).

The network meta-analysis of five different exercises based on depression scale outcomes showed that yoga was more effective in decreasing depressive symptoms than the control [SMD = –0.88, CI (–1.64, –0.12)]. Yoga, treadmill exercise and dance were significantly superior to cycling for reducing depression scores. Yoga therapy (SUCRA: 86.3%) was ranked highest for ameliorating PD with depression, followed by walking, treadmill exercise and dance (Supplementary Figures 6A, 7A and Supplementary Table 3).

Cognitive Assessment

Thirteen studies with five interventions assessed cognitive function (Supplementary Figure 4E). The pairwise meta-analysis showed that only dance therapy was more effective in improving the cognition of PD patients than the control (Supplementary Figure 5B).

We found that all p-values of consistency tests were higher than 0.05, which indicated that direct and indirect effects had good consistency (Supplementary Table 2).

The results of the network meta-analysis showed that only yoga was associated with significantly higher cognitive function scores than the control [SMD = 1.32 (0.11, 2.54)]. The ranks of the five interventions for enhancing cognitive function in PD were as follows: yoga, dance, treadmill exercise, walking, and cycling (Supplementary Figures 6, 7B and Supplementary Table 3).

Activities of Daily Living

Seventeen studies assessed ADL in PD. We conducted a pairwise meta and the results demonstrated that treadmill exercise, cycling and yoga were all associated with significantly greater changes in ADL scores than the control (Supplementary Figure 5C).

The p–values of consistency tests were substantially higher than 0.05, which demonstrated that the network analysis had good consistency (Supplementary Table 2).

We conducted a network meta-analysis to assess the intervention effects in terms of ADL. The results revealed that yoga, cycling, and treadmill exercise were all superior to the control in improving ADL [SMD = –0.60 (–1.00, –0.20); SMD = –0.53 (–0.97, –0.09); and SMD = –0.47 (–0.74, –0.19), respectively]. Furthermore, yoga and treadmill therapy were significantly more effective in improving performance of activities of daily living than dance. The rankings of these five interventions, which were based on the SUCRAs for the ADL scores, showed that yoga ranked first, followed by cycling, treadmill exercise and tai chi (Supplementary Figures 6C, 7C and Supplementary Table 3).

Secondary Outcomes

Adverse Outcomes

Thirty-three studies reported adverse events related to exercise therapies. Among these RCTs, 21 studies reported that no adverse events occurred during treatment. The remaining studies reported a minimal number of adverse events, mainly knee, neck and back pain, muscle soreness and non-injurious falls. All these events and the symptoms were resolved by resting or simple treatment without further management (see Supplementary Table 1).

Sensitivity Analysis

In order to minimize the influence of heterogeneous baseline severity of PD in our study, we restricted our analysis into trials with early to-moderate stage of Parkinson’s disease as sensitivity analysis. The result showed that five therapies were superior to the control in reducing the UPDRS-motor score and yoga ranked first based on the SUCRA (93.4%). Besides, a sensitivity analysis after excluding studies that contained resistance active exercise as control group was conducted. All therapies except cycling were significantly superior to placebo and yoga also ranked first based on the SUCRA (95.2%), which were consistent with those previous produced (Supplementary Figures 8A–H). Besides, the sensitivity analysis of other outcomes (TUG, BBS, Depression scale, Cognitive outcome and ADL) were also in line with those previous conducted (the specific analysis were shown in Supplementary Figures 8I–X and Supplementary Figures 9A–H). The sensitivity analysis all indicated the results were stable.

Publication Bias

We constructed a funnel plot of our outcomes to assess publication bias. The plots all showed that the effect size of the included studies was distributed symmetrically, which demonstrated that there was minimal publication bias in this analysis (Supplementary Figure 10).

Discussion

Principal Findings

We conducted a network meta-analysis that included 52 RCTs with six different treatments and obtained several principal findings summarized as follows.

The pooled results suggested that yoga, walking, dance, and tai chi were superior in reducing the UPDRS-motor scores of PD patients, and yoga and walking might be highly effective based on the SUCRA rankings. In the TUG test, yoga, tai chi and treadmill exercise were superior to the control. Additionally, yoga ranked first in decreasing the TUG score. Moreover, in terms of the BBS Walking had the highest efficacy among these various treatments in terms of BBS score. According to the clustered ranking plot of the network, yoga and walking might be the important therapies for comprehensively increasing motor and balance function in PD patients. Previous studies also found that yoga and walking exerted beneficial effects on motor function in PD (Bombieri et al., 2017; Cugusi et al., 2017; Godi et al., 2019; Adams et al., 2020; De Santis and Kaplan, 2020; Deuel and Seeberger, 2020).

Regarding psychosocial outcomes, the results suggested that yoga and dance could be significantly more effective in reducing depressive symptoms and improving cognitive function. Overall, yoga might be the important alternative therapy for PD patients with depression or dementia according to the SUCRA rankings. These findings were in line with previous studies revealing that patients report that yoga is enjoyable, feasible and beneficial regarding their depressive and anxiety symptoms (Jin et al., 2019; Deuel and Seeberger, 2020; Sagarwala and Nasrallah, 2020). In addition, a previous study demonstrated that yoga enhanced executive functions, memory and attention to some extent, which was consistent with our results (Chobe et al., 2020). Furthermore, dance might also be an important option that could be recommended for PD patients with cognitive impairment because the pairwise-meta result and previous studies all indicated that dance has potential benefit for ameliorating cognitive dysfunction (Kalyani et al., 2019; Hasan et al., 2021).

For the ADL scale, we found that yoga, cycling, and treadmills were more effective than controls in improving the ADL of PD patients, especially yoga, which ranked higher in the ADL assessment, suggesting that yoga might be the vital option for patients with poor activities of daily living. A previous review also agreed with our results and indicated that yoga therapy improved the PDQ-ADL score and mood of PD patients more than other therapies (Subramanian, 2017).

No severe adverse events occurred during exercise therapies. Only a few patients suffered muscle soreness or minor low back or knee pain. All these events can be resolved by resting and not affect the treatment process. Overall, aerobic or mind-body therapy is a safer treatment for addressing PD symptoms than other therapies.

With regard to the quality of the included RCTs, 67.31% were determined to be high-quality RCTs, which indicated that the pooled results were robust and reliable overall. However, the high risk of improper blinding of participants still existed in this analysis, which might decrease the strength of the evidence to a degree.

Findings in Relation to Previous Reviews

To our knowledge, this network meta-analysis is the first study to include all previously examined types of aerobic and mind-body exercise and to explore the rankings of various types of therapies for PD according to a comprehensive range of outcomes. Most of the previous meta-analyses focused on evaluating the efficacy of only one type of exercise for PD (Cugusi et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019; Robinson et al., 2019; Carapellotti et al., 2020). However, head-to-head comparisons between various therapies are still lacking, making it difficult for patients to make optimal decisions. Previous reviews about aerobic exercise reported that aerobic exercise have beneficial effects in improving motor action, balance function in PD patients (Shu et al., 2014; Schootemeijer et al., 2020), which were agreed with our results of aerobic exercise. A review compared the efficacy of different kinds of mind-body exercise, including yoga, and tai chi, for motor outcomes, depressive symptoms and quality of life in PD and implied that mind-body exercise might have significant improvements in motor function, depressive symptoms and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease, which was consistent with most of our results (Jin et al., 2019). Another review also investigated the effect of mind-body exercises (including yoga, taichi, and dance) on physiological outcomes for PD, the result indicated that mind-body exercises have moderate to large beneficial effects on motor function (Kwok et al., 2016). However, these studies did not examine all previously examined types of aerobic and mind-body exercise together that might prohibited accurate comparisons of the efficacy of aerobic and mind-body therapies for PD outcomes. Furthermore, the assessment of non-motor function, especially psychiatric symptoms, was not amply investigated in these studies. Therefore, our analysis comprehensively assesses the efficacy of all previously examined aerobic and mind-body exercises for treating PD and determines the important therapy for improving motor and non-motor outcomes in PD.

Implications for Clinical Practice

Overall, our results have several clinical implications. First, the results suggest that yoga and walking may be the important exercises for enhancing motor function and balance functional ability. Second, yoga as a mind-body exercise is a good option for PD complicated with depressive disorder and cognitive impairment. Moreover, yoga therapy for 60 min, two times a week can be recommended as the potential optimal dose for improving mobility in PD. Therefore, these evidence-based results could be recommended for PD patients and assist clinical doctors in making appropriate decisions.

Limitations

Our analysis has several limitations. In terms of non-motor outcomes, few studies and interventions were included in the analysis. Moreover, RCTs of head-to-head comparisons with other active therapies that included non-motor assessments were lacking, providing little direct evidence for overall or accurate evaluation of the efficacy of exercise therapies for non-motor symptoms (especially depressive symptoms and cognitive function) in PD. Besides, because of the limit number of yoga studies and the limitations of SUCRA, the results in this study should be interpreted with caution. Hence, more studies involving yoga are needed. In addition, most of the included studies lacked participant blinding because the exercise therapies were non-drug interventions. However, this could have resulted in bias for the intervention group.

Conclusion

The network meta-analysis reported herein indicates that aerobic and mind-body therapies significantly improve the motor function of PD patients at all stages. Yoga and walking could be prior to recommend for PD patients with motor symptoms and balance impairment. Yoga may also be the important option for decreasing depressive disorder and cognitive impairment and could be recommended as part of treatment for life style changes in patients with PD. The potential appropriate dose of yoga for enhancing motor ability in PD patients is 60-min sessions, 2 times a week.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

MZ and DC designed the study and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. YX and HG acquired the data. CW and CT analyzed and interpreted the data. CW drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M682684), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2020A151501325), the Project of Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province (No. 20203010), and the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People’s Republic of China (No. GZY-FJS-2019001).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We were very grateful to all the researchers involved in this study.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2021.739115/full#supplementary-material

References

Adams, E. V., Van Puymbroeck, M., Walter, A., Hawkins, B. L., Schmid, A. A., and Sharp, J. L. (2020). Predictors of functional improvements after therapeutic yoga intervention for people with Parkinson’s disease. Int. J. Yoga Therap. 30, 9–18. doi: 10.17761/2020-D-18-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ahlskog, J. E. (2018). Aerobic exercise: evidence for a direct brain effect to slow Parkinson disease progression. Mayo Clin. Proc. 93, 360–372. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.12.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bombieri, F., Schena, F., Pellegrini, B., Barone, P., Tinazzi, M., and Erro, R. (2017). Walking on four limbs: a systematic review of nordic walking in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 38, 8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., and Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods 1, 97–111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carapellotti, A. M., Stevenson, R., and Doumas, M. (2020). The efficacy of dance for improving motor impairments, non-motor symptoms, and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 15:e0236820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236820

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, K., Tan, Y., Lu, Y., Wu, J., Liu, X., and Zhao, Y. (2020). Effect of Exercise on quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsons Dis. 2020:3257623. doi: 10.1155/2020/3257623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chobe, S., Chobe, M., Metri, K., Patra, S. K., and Nagaratna, R. (2020). Impact of Yoga on cognition and mental health among elderly: a systematic review. Complement Ther. Med. 52:102421. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collaborators, G. B. D. N. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18, 459–480. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Collaborators, G. B. D. P. S. D. (2018). Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 17, 939–953. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30295-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Connolly, B. S., and Lang, A. E. (2014). Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA 311, 1670–1683. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cugusi, L., Manca, A., Dragone, D., Deriu, F., Solla, P., Secci, C., et al. (2017). Nordic walking for the management of people with Parkinson disease: a systematic review. PM R 9, 1157–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.06.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., Chandler, J., Welch, V. A., Higgins, J. P., et al. (2019). Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 10:ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

da Silva, F. C., Iop, R. D. R., de Oliveira, L. C., Boll, A. M., de Alvarenga, J. G. S., Gutierres Filho, P. J. B., et al. (2018). Effects of physical exercise programs on cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the last 10 years. PLoS One 13:e0193113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Santis, K. K., and Kaplan, I. (2020). The motor and the non-motor outcomes of nordic walking in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 24, 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.01.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deuel, L. M., and Seeberger, L. C. (2020). Complementary therapies in Parkinson disease: a review of acupuncture, tai chi, qi gong, yoga, and cannabis. Neurotherapeutics 17, 1434–1455. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00900-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dias, S., and Caldwell, D. M. (2019). Network meta-analysis explained. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 104, F8–F12. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dias, S., Welton, N. J., Caldwell, D. M., and Ades, A. E. (2010). Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 29, 932–944. doi: 10.1002/sim.3767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, J. M., and Fell, M. J. (2017). Current approaches to the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27, 4247–4255. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.07.075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Godi, M., Giardini, M., and Schieppati, M. (2019). Walking along curved trajectories. Changes with age and Parkinson’s disease. Hints to rehabilitation. Front. Neurol. 10:532. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grimes, D., Fitzpatrick, M., Gordon, J., Miyasaki, J., Fon, E. A., Schlossmacher, M., et al. (2019). Canadian guideline for Parkinson disease. CMAJ 191, E989–E1004. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hasan, S. M., Alshafie, S., Hasabo, E. A., Saleh, M., Elnaiem, W., Qasem, A., et al. (2021). Efficacy of dance for Parkinson’s disease: a pooled analysis of 372 patients. J. Neurol. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10589-4 [Epub ahead of print].

CrossRef Full Text | PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hentz, J. G., Mehta, S. H., Shill, H. A., Driver-Dunckley, E., Beach, T. G., and Adler, C. H. (2015). Simplified conversion method for unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale motor examinations. Mov. Disord. 30, 1967–1970. doi: 10.1002/mds.26435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, X., Wang, L., Liu, S., Zhu, L., Loprinzi, P. D., and Fan, X. (2019). The impact of mind-body exercises on motor function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:31. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalyani, H. H. N., Sullivan, K., Moyle, G., Brauer, S., Jeffrey, E. R., Roeder, L., et al. (2019). Effects of dance on gait, cognition, and dual-tasking in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Parkinsons Dis. 9, 335–349. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kwok, J. Y., Choi, K. C., and Chan, H. Y. (2016). Effects of mind-body exercises on the physiological and psychosocial well-being of individuals with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 29, 121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H. H., Yeh, N. C., Wu, Y. F., Yang, Y. R., Wang, R. Y., and Cheng, F. Y. (2019). Effects of tai chi exercise on reducing falls and improving balance performance in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsons Dis. 2019:9626934. doi: 10.1155/2019/9626934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mandolesi, L., Polverino, A., Montuori, S., Foti, F., Ferraioli, G., Sorrentino, P., et al. (2018). Effects of physical exercise on cognitive functioning and wellbeing: biological and psychological benefits. Front. Psychol. 9:509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pianta, S., Lee, J. Y., Tuazon, J. P., Castelli, V., Mantohac, L. M., Tajiri, N., et al. (2019). A short bout of exercise prior to stroke improves functional outcomes by enhancing angiogenesis. Neuromol. Med. 21, 517–528. doi: 10.1007/s12017-019-08533-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robinson, A. G., Dennett, A. M., and Snowdon, D. A. (2019). Treadmill training may be an effective form of task-specific training for improving mobility in people with Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 105, 174–186. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rouse, B., Chaimani, A., and Li, T. (2017). Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians. Intern. Emerg. Med. 12, 103–111. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1583-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sagarwala, R., and Nasrallah, H. A. (2020). The effects of yoga on depression and motor function in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a review of controlled studies. Ann. Clin. Psychiatry 32, 209–215.

Google Scholar

Salanti, G., Ades, A. E., and Ioannidis, J. P. (2011). Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64, 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Savovic, J., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A., Turner, L., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., et al. (2014). Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation. Syst. Rev. 3:37. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-37

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schenkman, M., Moore, C. G., Kohrt, W. M., Hall, D. A., Delitto, A., Comella, C. L., et al. (2018). Effect of high-intensity treadmill exercise on motor symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson disease: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 75, 219–226. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schootemeijer, S., van der Kolk, N. M., Bloem, B. R., and de Vries, N. M. (2020). Current perspectives on aerobic exercise in people with Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics 17, 1418–1433. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00904-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shim, S., Yoon, B. H., Shin, I. S., and Bae, J. M. (2017). Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata. Epidemiol. Health 39:e2017047. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2017047

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shu, H. F., Yang, T., Yu, S. X., Huang, H. D., Jiang, L. L., Gu, J. W., et al. (2014). Aerobic exercise for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 9:e100503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100503

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stoker, T. B., and Barker, R. A. (2020). Recent developments in the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. F1000Res 9:F1000 Faculty Rev-862. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25634.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Subramanian, I. (2017). Complementary and alternative medicine and exercise in nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 134, 1163–1188. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2017.05.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van der Kolk, N. M., de Vries, N. M., Kessels, R. P. C., Joosten, H., Zwinderman, A. H., Post, B., et al. (2019). Effectiveness of home-based and remotely supervised aerobic exercise in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 18, 998–1008. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30285-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, I. R., Barrett, J. K., Jackson, D., and Higgins, J. P. (2012). Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res. Synth. Methods 3, 111–125. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar