%A King,Susan %A Wang,Joanne %A Priesol,Adrian J. %A Lewis,Richard F. %D 2014 %J Frontiers in Neurology %C %F %G English %K vestibular,Migraine,Cerebellum,Perception,oculomotor %Q %R 10.3389/fneur.2014.00233 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2014-November-10 %9 Hypothesis and Theory %+ Richard F. Lewis,Jenks Vestibular Physiology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary,USA,richard_lewis@meei.harvard.edu %+ Richard F. Lewis,Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School,USA,richard_lewis@meei.harvard.edu %+ Richard F. Lewis,Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School,USA,richard_lewis@meei.harvard.edu %# %! vestibular migraine and canal-otolith interactions %* %< %T Central Integration of Canal and Otolith Signals is Abnormal in Vestibular Migraine %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2014.00233 %V 5 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 1664-2295 %X Vestibular migraine (VM), a common cause of vestibular symptoms within the general population, is a disabling and poorly understood form of dizziness. We sought to examine the underlying pathophysiology of VM with three studies, which involved the central synthesis of canal and otolith cues, and present preliminary results from each of these studies: (1) VM patients appear to have reduced motion perception thresholds when canal and otolith signals are modulated in a co-planar manner during roll tilt; (2) percepts of roll tilt appear to develop more slowly in VM patients than in control groups during a centrifugation paradigm that presents conflicting, orthogonal canal and otolith cues; and (3) eye movement responses appear to be different in VM patients when studied with a post-rotational tilt paradigm, which also presents a canal–otolith conflict, as the shift of the eye’s rotational axis was larger in VM and the relationship between the axis shift and tilt suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex differed in VM patients relative to control groups. Based on these preliminary perceptual and eye movement results obtained with three different motion paradigms, we present a hypothesis that the integration of canal and otolith signals by the brain is abnormal in VM and that this abnormality could be cerebellar in origin. We provide potential mechanisms that could underlie these observations, and speculate that one of more of these mechanisms contributes to the vestibular symptoms and motion intolerance that are characteristic of the VM syndrome.