Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 12 June 2023
Sec. Epilepsy

Big Five personality predict epilepsy diagnosis in 7  years

  • Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Objective: Recently, there is growing interest in investigating how personality traits could predict a subsequent diagnosis of various diseases. Regarding epilepsy, there is only preliminary evidence based on cross-sectional studies linking personality traits to epilepsy, hence, emphasizing the need for longitudinal studies. The aim of the current study is to assess if the Big Five personality traits can predict the risk of an epilepsy diagnosis.

Methods: The current study analyzed data from 17,789 participants who participated in Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) at Wave 3 (collected between 2011 and 2012) and Wave 10 (collected between 2018 and 2019). The mean age was 47.01 (SD = 16.31) years and were 42.62% male. Two binary logistic regressions were used by including age, monthly income, highest educational qualification, legal marital status, residence, and standardized personality traits scores at Wave 3 as predictors for a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy at Wave 10 for males and females, respectively.

Results: There were 175 participants (0.98%) with epilepsy and 17,614 participants (99.02%) without epilepsy at Wave 10. Results of the binary regression analyses revealed that Neuroticism is positively related to the risk of an epilepsy diagnosis in males (OR = 1.32, p = 0.04, 95% CI [1.01, 1.71]) but not in females 7  years after Wave 3 at Wave 10. However, other personality traits including Agreeableness, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion were not significant predictors of epilepsy diagnosis.

Conclusion: These findings suggested that personality traits might enhance our understanding of psychophysiological associations in epilepsy. Neuroticism might be a relevant factor that should be taken into account in epilepsy education and treatment. Moreover, sex differences must be taken into account.

1. Introduction

Personality traits capture the basic individual differences in terms of the way people perceive, feel, think, and behave. The widely used Big Five model of personality consists of five broad traits/domains including Neuroticism (i.e., the tendency of being emotionally unstable), Agreeableness (the tendency to be cooperative, altruistic, and empathic), Openness (i.e., the tendency to taking novel routes), Conscientiousness (the tendency of being task-oriented and organized), and Extraversion (i.e., the tendency of being assertive and sociable) (1, 2). As one of the most widely used personality models in the literature, the Big Five can be also translated into other personality models as well (24). Recently, there are growing interest in investigating how personality traits could predict a subsequent diagnosis of various diseases. For instance, it has been suggested that Big Five personality traits can predict subsequent diseases later in life such as having a stroke, a heart condition, and a lung disease (5).

Personality traits can also be risks for an epilepsy diagnosis. Indeed, there are some studies that have looked at the associations between epilepsy and personality traits and found that there are associations between epilepsy and personality traits (612). Specifically, studies tend to find that people with epilepsy have higher levels of Neuroticism (612) and aggression (9) compared to healthy controls. In addition, a few studies have also found people with epilepsy are characterized by lower Openness compared to people without epilepsy (7, 10) and people with non-epilepsy seizures (12).

Thus, although there are some studies that compared the differences in personality traits between people with and without epilepsy, much less is known about how personality traits could prospectively predict the risks of epilepsy diagnosis in 7 years given the associations between epilepsy and personality traits can be bi-directional. Moreover, sex differences must be considered as women tend to have higher Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism scores than men (e.g., (13)). Moreover, women have a slightly lower prevalence of epilepsy than men (e.g., (14)). The aim of the current study is to assess how Big Five personality traits could predict a diagnosis of epilepsy in 7 years.

2. Methods

2.1. Data

This study used data from Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), which has been collecting annual information from the original sample of UK households since 1991 (15). Participants completed the demographics and personality questions at Wave 3, which was collected between 2011 and 2012, and questions regarding if they have been clinically diagnosed with epilepsy at Wave 10, which was collected between 2018 and 2019. All data collections have been approved by the University of Essex Ethical Committee. Participants completed informed consent before participation in all studies. This data set is publicly available at https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk. Participants with any missing variables of interest were removed from further analysis. Thus, there were 17, 789 participants with a mean age of 47.01 (SD = 16.31) years old with 42.62% males remaining for further analysis.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Personality traits

Personality was measured using the 15-item version of the Big Five Inventory (16) with a Likert scale ranging from 1 (“disagree strongly”) to 5 (“agree strongly”). Scores were reverse-coded when appropriate. The exact set of questions used to ask participants can be found at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/mainstage/dataset-documentation/term/personality-traits?search_api_views_fulltext=. Mean scores were used for each of these traits. All personality scores were standardized (mean = 0, SD = 1) before further analysis.

2.2.2. Epilepsy

Participants answered the question “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you have any of these conditions? Epilepsy.” Self-reported epilepsy is a valid measure to assess epilepsy status in cohort studies (17) with good positive predictive value, good sensitivity, and specificity.

2.2.3. Control variables

Control variables in the model include age (continuous), sex (male = 1 vs. female = 2), monthly income (continuous), highest educational qualification (college = 1 or below college = 2), legal marital status (single = 1 vs. married = 2), residence (urban = 1 vs. rural = 2), and life satisfaction (on a scale from “1 = completely dissatisfied” to “7 = completely satisfied”).

2.3. Analysis

Personality traits including Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Openness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion scores and life satisfaction were standardized before (mean = 0, SD = 1) further analysis. Two binary logistic regressions were used by taking demographics including age, monthly income, highest educational qualification, legal marital status, residence, and standardized personality traits scores at Wave 3 predictors to predict ever clinical diagnosis of epilepsy at Wave 10 for males and females, respectively.

3. Results

The mean age of these participants is 47.01 with a standard deviation of 16.31. The average monthly income of these participants is 1465.98 with a standard deviation of 1381.43. The mean life satisfaction score is 5.19 with a standard deviation of 1.47. The average of personality traits scores before standardization is 3.58 for Neuroticism, 5.64 for Agreeableness, 4.58 for Openness, 5.51 for Conscientiousness, 4.58 for Extraversion with a standard deviation of 1.43, 1.02, 1.28, 1.08, and 1.30, respectively. In addition, 7,582 (42.62%) of them are males with 10,207 females (57.38%). 11,751 (66.06%) participants have not received a college degree whereas 6,038 (33.94%) of them received at least a college degree. Out of 11,789 participants involved in the study, 7,846 participants (44.11%) were single whereas 9,943 (55.89%) were married. There were also 12,421 participants living in the cities whereas 4,368 participants lived in rural areas (24.55%). Most importantly, 17,614 participants (99.02%) indicated that they have not been clinically diagnosed with epilepsy in Wave 10 whereas 175 participants (0.98%) indicated that they have been clinically diagnosed with epilepsy in Wave 10 (Table 1). The current study found that age is whereas Neuroticism is related to a higher risk of epilepsy diagnosis in a 7-year period (OR = 1.32, p = 0.04, 95% CI [1.01, 1.71]) in males but not in females (Table 2).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for control variables and personality traits.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The binary logistic regression results with demographics and personality traits at Wave 3 as predictors and whether one has been clinically diagnosed with epilepsy at Wave 10 as the predicted variable for males and females, respectively.

4. Discussion

Taken together, the aim of the current study was to assess whether personality traits serve as risk factors for epilepsy prospectively. By using a binary logistic regression to analyze data from 17,789 participants from UKHLS with a mean age of 47.01 (SD = 16.31) years old and 42.62% of males, the current study revealed that Neuroticism is positively related to the risks of epilepsy diagnosis in 7 years in males but not in females.

The findings from the current study are largely consistent with previous studies regarding the positive associations between epilepsy and Neuroticism (612) in both males and females. People who score high on Neuroticism tend to be emotionally unstable and are at great risk of developing depressive symptoms (18). These findings can be potentially explained by the association between mental health problems and epilepsy (e.g., (19, 20)). Moreover, Neuroticism is also associated with higher levels of inflammation (21), which then contributes to the risk of developing epilepsy in 7 years (See (22) a review). Moreover, Neuroticism is also associated with health-risk behaviors such as less physical activity and more sedentary behaviors (23), smoking (24, 25), and excessive alcohol use (26), which may then lead to a higher risk of epilepsy (27).

Despite some strengths of the current study including the use of a large, longitudinal sample that assessed clinical epilepsy diagnosis, there are some limitations that may motivate future research. First, measuring personality traits earlier in life over a longer period of time can further clarify the association between personality traits and epilepsy. Second, it is possible that epilepsy can occur and impact personality traits before the official diagnosis of epilepsy. Third, the current study focused on a sample from the United Kingdom, which may make it hard to generalize the current findings to other countries. Future studies should test if this association still exists in other countries. Finally, other risk factors of epilepsy including alcohol misuse, stoke, brain tumor, head injury were not controlled in the present study. Future studies should control these risk factors of epilepsy.

Taken together, the current study is among the first that has demonstrated that personality traits are predictors of subsequent clinical diagnosis of epilepsy. The current study found that Neuroticism is positively related to the risks of epilepsy diagnosis in 7 years in males but not in females. Thus, there is a need to include personality traits in routine assessments by health professionals, as they could identify individuals with a greater risk of developing epilepsy. Moreover, sex differences must be taken into account.

Data availability statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by University of Essex. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin

Author contributions

WK: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, resources, software, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing.

Funding

This work was supported by the Imperial Open Access Fund.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Costa, PT Jr, and McCrae, RR. Professional manual for the NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources (1992).

Google Scholar

2. McCrae, RR, and Costa, PT. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1987) 52:81–90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Goldberg, LR. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol. (1993) 48:26–34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Marshall, GN, Wortman, CB, Vickers, RR, Kusulas, JW, and Hervig, LK. The five-factor model of personality as a framework for personality-health research. J Pers Soc Psychol. (1994) 67:278–86. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Weston, SJ, Hill, PL, and Jackson, JJ. Personality traits predict the onset of disease. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. (2015) 6:309–17. doi: 10.1177/1948550614553248

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Rassart, J, Luyckx, K, Verdyck, L, Mijnster, T, and Mark, RE. Personality functioning in adults with refractory epilepsy and community adults: implications for health-related quality of life. Epilepsy Res. (2020) 159:106251. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Bonet, CNR, Hermann, B, Cook, CJ, Hwang, G, Dabbs, K, Nair, V, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of personality traits in temporal lobe epilepsy: findings from the epilepsy connectome project. Epilepsy Behav. (2019) 98:220–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.07.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Findikli, E, Izci, F, Camkurt, MA, Tuncel, D, Sahin, MC, Kuran, MY, et al. Eysenck personality characteristics of epilepsy patients and its effect on quality of life. J Mood Dis. (2016) 6:124–32. doi: 10.5455/jmood.20160425114144

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Shehata, GA, and Bateh, AEAM. Cognitive function, mood, behavioral aspects, and personality traits of adult males with idiopathic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. (2009) 14:121–4. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang, X, Lv, Y, Zhang, W, and Meng, H. Cognitive impairment and personality traits in epilepsy: characterization and risk factor analysis. J Nerv Ment Dis. (2018) 206:794–9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000880

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wilson, SJ, Wrench, JM, McIntosh, AM, Bladin, PF, and Berkovic, SF. Personality development in the context of intractable epilepsy. Arch Neurol. (2009) 66:68–72. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2008.532

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Leong, M, Wang, AD, Trainor, D, Johnstone, B, Rayner, G, Kalincik, T, et al. Personality profiles differ between patients with epileptic seizures and patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. Seizure. (2019) 73:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Weisberg, YJ, DeYoung, CG, and Hirsh, JB. Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Front Psychol. (2011) 2:178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. McHugh, JC, and Delanty, N. Epidemiology and classification of epilepsy: gender comparisons. Int Rev Neurobiol. (2008) 83:11–26. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(08)00002-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research. (2022). Understanding Society: Waves 1–11, 2009–2020 and Harmonised BHPS: Waves 1–18, 1991–2009 [data collection]. 15th Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 6614. Available at: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6614-16.

Google Scholar

16. John, OP, Donahue, EM, and Kentle, RL. The Big Five inventory – Versions 4a and 5. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research (1991).

Google Scholar

17. Brooks, DR, Avetisyan, R, Jarrett, KM, Hanchate, A, Shapiro, GD, Pugh, MJ, et al. Validation of self-reported epilepsy for purposes of community surveillance. Epilepsy Behav. (2012) 23:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.11.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Jylhä, P, and Isometsä, E. The relationship of neuroticism and extraversion to symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general population. Depress Anxiety. (2006) 23:281–9. doi: 10.1002/da.20167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Beletsky, V, and Mirsattari, SM. Epilepsy, mental health disorder, or both? Epilepsy Res Treat. (2012) 2012:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2012/163731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Tellez-Zenteno, JF, Patten, SB, Jetté, N, Williams, J, and Wiebe, S. Psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy: a population-based analysis. Epilepsia. (2007) 48:2336–44.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

21. Luchetti, M, Barkley, JM, Stephan, Y, Terracciano, A, and Sutin, AR. Five-factor model personality traits and inflammatory markers: new data and a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2014) 50:181–93. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.08.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rana, A, and Musto, AE. The role of inflammation in the development of epilepsy. J Neuroinflammation. (2018) 15:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1192-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sutin, AR, Stephan, Y, Luchetti, M, Artese, A, Oshio, A, and Terracciano, A. The five-factor model of personality and physical inactivity: a meta-analysis of 16 samples. J Res Pers. (2016) 63:22–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hakulinen, C, Hintsanen, M, Munafò, MR, Virtanen, M, Kivimäki, M, Batty, GD, et al. Personality and smoking: individual-participant meta-analysis of nine cohort studies. Addiction. (2015) 110:1844–52. doi: 10.1111/add.13079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Kang, W. Personality predicts smoking frequency: an empirical examination separated by sex. Personal Individ Differ. (2022) 199:111843. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111843

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Luchetti, M, Sutin, AR, Delitala, A, Stephan, Y, Fiorillo, E, Marongiu, M, et al. Personality traits and facets linked with self-reported alcohol consumption and biomarkers of liver health. Addict Behav. (2018) 82:135–41. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.02.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Rong, L, Frontera, AT Jr, and Benbadis, SR. Tobacco smoking, epilepsy, and seizures. Epilepsy Behav. (2014) 31:210–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.11.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Big Five, personality, neuroticism, epilepsy, risk factor

Citation: Kang W (2023) Big Five personality predict epilepsy diagnosis in 7  years. Front. Neurol. 14:1083792. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1083792

Received: 29 October 2022; Accepted: 11 May 2023;
Published: 12 June 2023.

Edited by:

Hanna Kampling, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany

Reviewed by:

Eva Bailles, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Spain
Filipa Novais, Santa Maria Hospital, Portugal

Copyright © 2023 Kang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Weixi Kang, weixi20kang@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.