%A Monti,Martin
%D 2011
%J Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
%C
%F
%G English
%K autocorrelation,Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent (BOLD),Fixed Effects,functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI),General Linear Model (GLM),Mixed Effects,multicollinearity
%Q
%R 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00028
%W
%L
%N 28
%M
%P
%7
%8 2011-March-18
%9 Review
%+ Dr Martin Monti,University of California Los angeles,Psychology,Los Angeles,90095,CA,United States,Akira099@hotmail.com
%#
%! Statistical Analysis of fMRI Time-Series
%*
%<
%T Statistical Analysis of fMRI Time-Series: A Critical Review of the GLM Approach
%U https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00028
%V 5
%0 JOURNAL ARTICLE
%@ 1662-5161
%X Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is one of the most widely used tools to study the neural underpinnings of human cognition. Standard analysis of fMRI data relies on a General Linear Model (GLM) approach to separate stimulus induced signals from noise. Crucially, this approach relies on a number of assumptions about the data which, for inferences to be valid, must be met. The current paper reviews the GLM approach to analysis of fMRI time-series, focusing in particular on the degree to which such data abides by the assumptions of the GLM framework, and on the methods that have been developed to correct for any violation of those assumptions. Rather than biasing estimates of effect size, the major consequence of non-conformity to the assumptions is to introduce bias into estimates of the variance, thus affecting test statistics, power and false positive rates. Furthermore, this bias can have pervasive effects on both individual subject and group-level statistics, potentially yielding qualitatively different results across replications, especially after the thresholding procedures commonly used for inference-making.