Front. Neurosci.Frontiers in NeuroscienceFront. Neurosci.1662-453XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fnins.2013.00090NeuroscienceGeneral Commentary ArticleCorrigendum: Iowa gambling task: there is more to consider than long-term outcome. Using a linear equation model to disentangle the impact of outcome and frequency of gains and lossesHorstmannAnnette12*VillringerArno1234NeumannJane121Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck SocietyLeipzig, Germany2Integrated Research and Treatment Center Adiposity Diseases, Leipzig University Medical CenterLeipzig, Germany3Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital LeipzigLeipzig, Germany4Mind and Brain Institute, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University BerlinBerlin, Germany
*Correspondence: e-mail: horstmann@cbs.mpg.de
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, a specialty of Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Edited by: Björn Brembs, University of Regensburg, Germany
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
A commentary on Iowa gambling task: there is more to consider than long-term outcome. Using a linear equation model to disentangle the impact of outcome and frequency of gains and losses by Horstmann, A., Villringer, A., and Neumann, J. (2012). Front. Neurosci. 6:61. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00061
A mistake regarding the exemplary weights given in Table 4 of our original publication was recently brought to our attention. We corrected the weights and give the complete and updated table in this commentary.
(corrected): Example (one subject's) least squares solution of the linear equation model for mean choices in block 5.