Deletion of Kncn Does Not Affect Kinocilium and Stereocilia Bundle Morphogenesis and Mechanotransduction in Cochlear Hair Cells

Introduction

Cochlear hair cells are neuroepithelial cells characterized by hair bundles on their apical surface (Flock, 1971; Fettiplace and Hackney, 2006; Hudspeth, 2013). Hair cells transduce mechanical stimuli into electrical activity (Hudspeth and Corey, 1977). The site of hair cell transduction is at the hair bundle, an array of modified microvilli or stereocilia arranged in a staircase-like shape with the longest stereocilia juxtaposed next to the kinocilium (Pickles et al., 1984; Kachar et al., 2000). Adjacent stereocilia are connected along their shafts by side links, whereas tip links, formed by cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 (Siemens et al., 2004; Kazmierczak et al., 2007), extend from the apex of each stereocilium to the side of its taller neighbor (Pickles et al., 1984; Kachar et al., 2000; Goodyear et al., 2005). The stereocilia contain bundles of uniformly polarized actin filaments with the barbed ends pointing toward the stereociliary tips (Tilney and Tilney, 1986). The filaments contain β- and γ-actin and are cross-linked by espin, plastin1 and T-plastin (Tilney et al., 1989; Zine et al., 1995; Zheng et al., 2000; Daudet and Lebart, 2002). To guide hair bundle in position, the kinocilium is the key structure to polarize the apex and guide bundle formation in sensory hair cells.

Despite the fact that the kinocilium has long been considered as a transient embryonic feature without any functional significance in the adult cochlear hair cells, it is critical for the development of hair bundle polarity and orientation. At the onset of hair bundle morphogenesis, a single microtubular kinocilium is localized in the center of the apical cell surface covered with microvilli. The kinocilium subsequently moves to the destination side of cuticular plate and the first row of stereocilia next to the kinocilium start to elongate, as well as the following adjacent rows of stereocilia (Frolenkov et al., 2004). The kinocilium is important for hair bundle development and maturation but not contributing in mechanotransduction (MET; Hudspeth and Jacobs, 1979). As a primary cilium, it presents with a microtubular composition of 9 + 0, 9 + 2 or 8 + 1 (Kikuchi et al., 1988; Kelley et al., 1992; Sobkowicz et al., 1995), which implies a dynamic assembly of microtubule there. Although the kinocilium remains in adult mammalian vestibular hair cells and in all hair cells of nonmammals, the kinocilium degenerates in auditory hair cell upon maturation of the hair bundle. For example, the kinocilium starts to retract from postnatal day 8 (P8) and be completely gone at P12, in the mouse cochlear hair cells. Mutations lead to the loss of the kinocilium in hair cells followed by the degeneration of the sensory cells have been described in zebrafish (Tsujikawa and Malicki, 2004). Loss of kinociliary links is considered a cause of abnormal polarity of hair bundles in PCDH15-CD2 deficient mice (Webb et al., 2011). However, the factors including genes involved in kinocilium development and dynamics are not known completely.

The identification of genes commonly or preferentially expressed in the two types of cochlear hair cells, the inner hair cells (IHCs) and the outer hair cells (OHCs), is a powerful approach for deciphering the molecular organization and subsequent characterization of gene function of the two types of hair cells. Using microarray technique, we detected high expression of kinocilin (Kncn) in adult IHCs and OHCs (Liu et al., 2014). Kncn, encoding Kinocilin, was first detected in the kinocilia of vestibular and auditory hair cells at embryonic days 14.5 and 18.5, respectively (Leibovici et al., 2005). KNCN was still present in the kinocilium in the mature vestibular hair cells (Leibovici et al., 2005). In mature auditory hair cells, KNCN was present at the cuticular plate, at the base of each stereocilium. KNCN was also expressed by the pillar cells and Deiters cells, that both contain prominent transcellular and apical bundles of microtubules (Leibovici et al., 2005). Immunogold staining and biochemical study showed that the KNCN localized in microtubule-rich regions, where vesicles and cargos were actively transported (Leibovici et al., 2005). However, the function of KNCN has not been characterized up-to-date.

In this study, we examined the effect of Kncn deletion on stereocilia morphogenesis and hearing loss in mice. Hair bundle morphology was observed by fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MET of the stereocilia was evaluated by recording mechanically activated membrane current from hair cells of Kncn knockout mice. Our goal is to determine whether KNCN plays an important role in stereocilia/kinocilium-based bundle morphogenesis and maintenance, MET, and hair cell survival. Our results show that hair bundle has no obvious defect in hair cells of Kncn knockout mice. In parallel, the MET and hair cell survival are normal in the knockout mice.

Materials and Methods

Animal Care

The use of animals was approved and the experimental procedures were regulated by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tsinghua University.

Generation of Kncn Knockout Mice

The Kncn knockout mice were generated in our animal center by CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The Kncn sgRNA was designed using the online CRISPR toolbox¹ (Zhang Feng Lab) which targeted the Exon 1 of Kncn. T7-Cas9 plasmid (kindly provided by Dr. Yichang Jia at Tsinghua University) was linearized by Xba I (NEB), and purified by HiPure Gel Pure DNA mini Kit (D2111-02, Magen, China), and worked as the template (1 μg) for in vitro transcription by mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 ultra transcription kit (Ambion AM1345, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The Cas9 mRNA was purified by MEGAclear Kit (Ambion AM1908, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and dissolved in the microinjection buffer (MR-095-10F, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Both T7 promoter and targeting sgRNA sequences were added into sgRNA backbone template by PCR amplification using designed primers (Kncn-sgRNA F and R). Then the PCR product was purified with gel using HiPure Gel Pure DNA mini Kit (D2111-02, Magen, China) and used as the template (100 ng) for in vitro transcription using T7 RNA Polymerase (10881767001, Roche, Germany). The sgRNA were purified by using phenol: chloroform extraction and alcohol precipitation method, and then dissolved in the microinjection buffer (MR-095-10F, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The C57BL/6 mouse line was used for generating knockout. Cas9 mRNA (20 ng/μl) and sgRNA (10 ng/μl) targeting Kncn gene were mixed and injected into the cytoplasm of the fertilized eggs. The sequences of forward and reverse primers used for targeting sgRNA are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Genotyping

To genotype the littermate mice, the genomic DNA was extracted from the tails and the fragment around the gRNA target site was amplified by PCR and the genotypes were further determined by sequencing. The sequences of forward and reverse primers used for PCR genotyping of wild-type and Kncn knockout mice are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

RT-PCR and Q-PCR Analysis

Total RNA of different tissue was extracted using HiPure Universal RNA Kit (Magen, R4130-02) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was carried out using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) Kit (Vazyme, R223-01) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Polymerase chain reaction using 1 μl cDNA template for 10 μl system was performed using Phanta Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme, P505-d1). Then the agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to semi-quantify the mRNA level of Kncn. Q-PCR was carried out using ChamQ SYBR Q-PCR Master Mix (Low ROX Premixed) Kit (Vazyme, Q331-02) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sequences of RT-PCR and Q-PCR primers were listed in Supplementary Table S1.

In situ Hybridization

The inner ears of P4 mice were used for cryosection with 12 μm thickness. Generation of the RNA probe and in situ hybridization (ISH) were performed as described previously (Grillet et al., 2009). The RNA probe complementary to part of mouse Kncn cDNA (NCBI: NM_001039124) was amplified using primers containing T7 and T3 promoter (Kncn-ISH-F/Kncn-ISH-R) for in vitro transcription using T7 RNA Polymerase (10881767001, Roche, Germany) and T3 RNA Polymerase (11031163001, Roche, Germany).

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Inner ears were dissected out in phosphate buffer (0.1 M Na₂HPO₄·12H₂O, 0.1 M NaH₂PO₄·2H₂O, PH 7.4) and transferred into fixative buffer (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M phosphate buffer). A hole was poked at the apex to let the fixative flush through the cochlear labyrinth before the sample was fixed overnight at 4°C. The inner ears were washed with phosphate buffer for 10 min three times and fine-dissected to remove the spiral ligament, Reissner’s membrane and tectorial membrane. Samples were dehydrated by 30-min incubation in 10/20/30/50/70/80/90/100/100% ethanol, followed by 100/100/100% tertiary butanol before freeze drying (Hitachi ES-2030) and gold coating (Hitachi E-1010). The samples were imaged with FEI Quanta 200.

Immunostaining

The inner ear was dissociated from P4 mice. Cochleae of Kncn knockout and wild-type mice were collected in PBS and placed into PBS with 4% PFA for 30 min at room temperature (RT). The cochlea tissues were washed with PBS and blocked by using PBSTx (PBS + 0.5% Triton X-100) with 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at RT. The samples were incubated with primary antibodies (in PBSTx + 1% BSA) overnight at 4°C. After 3× washes with PBS, samples were further incubated with secondary antibody and phalloidin in PBSTx overnight at 4°C. Lastly, samples were again washed for six times with PBS. The samples were imaged with a deconvolution microscope (Delta Vision Elite, GE, USA). The following antibodies were used: KNCN antibody (1:200, rabbit, NBP2-48844, Novus Biological), Acetyl-alpha Tubulin (Lys40) Monoclonal Antibody (6-11B-1; 1:800, mouse, #32-2700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody Alexa Fluor 488 (1:2,000, A-11029, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 568 Phalloidin (1:2,000, A12380, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Electrophysiology

Hair cells were recorded using whole-cell patch-clamp technique as described previously (Xiong et al., 2012). Briefly, the basilar membrane (BM) with hair cells was acutely dissociated from P7 mice. The dissection solution contained (in mM): 141.7 NaCl, 5.36 KCl, 0.1 CaCl₂, 1 MgCl₂, 0.5 MgSO₄, 3.4 L-Glutamine, 10 glucose and 10 H-HEPES (pH 7.4). Then the BM was transferred into recording chamber with recording solution containing (in mM): 144 NaCl, 0.7 NaH₂PO₄, 5.8 KCl, 1.3 CaCl₂, 0.9 MgCl₂, 5.6 glucose and 10 H-HEPES (pH 7.4). The BM was used for electrophysiological recording within 1 h. An upright microscope (Olympus BX51WI) was used to observe hair cells. Patch pipettes were made from borosilicate glass capillary (Sutter, BF150-117-10) with a pipette puller (Sutter, P-2000) and polished with a microforge (Narishige, MF-830) to resistances of 3–5 MOhm. Intracellular solution contains (in mM): 140 KCl, 1 MgCl₂, 0.1 EGTA, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP and 10 H-HEPES, pH 7.2). The OHCs in the apical, middle, and basal part of the cochleae were recorded. Whole cell currents were sampled at 100 KHz with a patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA EPC 10 USB + Patchmaster software). Hair cells were voltage-clamped at −70 mV. The hair bundle was deflected by a fluid-jet pipette with a tip diameter of 5–10 μm that was positioned ~5 μm to the hair bundle to evoke maximum MET currents. The stimulation was in 40 Hz sinusoidal wave delivered from a 27-mm-diameter piezoelectric disc driven by a homemade piezo amplifier.

Auditory-Brainstem Response (ABR) Measurements

The adult mice were tested to evaluate hearing threshold by click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) as described previously (Chen et al., 2016). Before measurement, the mouse was anesthetized by i.p. injection of pentobarbitone. Then the mouse was transferred into a sound-proof chamber (Shengnuo, Shanghai) for audiometry. The audiometric evaluation was done with an auditory workstation (Tucker-Davis Technologies RZ6 system). The electrodes were placed into the mouse sub-dermally. The ground electrode was inserted in the back near the hind leg, and the reference electrode was just behind the pinna, and the active electrode was inserted at the vertex. A close-field speaker (TDT MF1) was placed onto the external ear canal through a conducting tube. A balanced click or pure tone stimuli (MF1 Speaker response range: 1–50 kHz) were applied per second, each with a duration of 0.1 ms, starting at 90 dB SPL and decreasing at 10 dB SPL step in intensity. Stimuli and recordings were performed with the BioSigRZ software provided with the TDT workstation. The number of acquisition trials was set to 512 for averaging.

Statistical Analysis

All the data are presented as mean ± SD or SEM depending on the cell number. Excel software (Microsoft) and Igor pro software (Wavemetrics) were used to analyze the data. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test, by which the result was noted in each panel.

Results

Kncn Gene Expression in Auditory Epithelium

To check the temporal expression pattern of Kncn gene in the hearing organ, we first performed RT-PCR to evaluate expression level of mRNAs collected from cochlear tissues at P0, P4, P7 and P14 ages. The results showed that Kncn was expressed in BM in adequate amount but with high specificity at first week, especially at P4. There were not visible expression in other tissues, even in stria vascularis (SV; Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure S1A). We further examined the expression level of Kncn by qPCR, which showed a significant Kncn expression largely in BM but much lesser in SV (Figure 1B). The KNCN antibody also demonstrated a strong signaling on kinocilia of hair cells from P4 mice (Figure 1C). These data were consistent with our microarray data (Liu et al., 2014) and Leibovici et al. (2005) that have showed a concentrated expression of KNCN protein in mouse inner ears. Consistently, we also observed similar staining pattern of KNCN in young adult cochleae at 1 month age, in which expressed in the pericuticular necklace of IHCs and in rootlets of OHCs (data not shown). However, we did not see Kncn expression in kidney, liver and heart (Supplementary Figure S1A), as reported by Leibovici et al. (2005). We further performed ISH to determine cell type specific distribution of Kncn mRNA in the inner ear at P4, from which the expression of Kncn was detected in the hair cells (Supplementary Figure S1B).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Kinocilin (Kncn) expression in the auditory epithelium of mouse inner ear. (A) RT-PCR of Kncn mRNA from the basilar membrane (BM) and the stria vascularis (SV) at P0, P4 and P7, as well as the cochleae at P14. The positive band for Kncn was 139bp that was amplified by qPCR primers. The RT-PCR experiments were repeated three times. (B) Statistics of quantitative mRNA level of Kncn from P7 BM and SV by qPCR. Data were presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. *P < 0.05. (C) Immunostaining of KNCN protein on cochlear hair cells from P4 wild-type mouse.

Generation of Kncn Knockout Mice

Together with previous study, our in vitro and ex vivo observation in the cochleae and hair cells suggested that Kncn gene might play a role in hair bundle development and/or function. To explore the physiological role of KNCN in hearing and transduction, Kncn knockout mouse lines were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technique. The mouse Kncn gene contains four exons, with the start and stop codon localizing in the first and last exon, respectively (Figure 2A). A guide RNA (gRNA) targeting site in the middle of exon 1 was designed to make gene disruption. Genomic DNA sequencing result showed that five insert/deletions (Indels) have been successfully introduced into exon 1 of Kncn of founder mice, in which we chose two genotypes for further breeding (Figure 2A). The two mutant mouse lines hosted deletions of 1 bp (Kncn^{−1bp/−1bp}) and 16 bp (Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}), respectively after the start codon validated by Sanger sequencing (Figures 2A,B). These changes caused premature translational stops, including a truncated protein of 20 amino acids and a truncated protein of 16 amino acids (Figure 2A). The CRISPR-generated F0 Kncn heterozygous mice were further crossed with wild type C57BL/6 mice to bring up the F2 mice with homozygous genotypes. The KNCN antibody could not recognize the kinocilia structure anymore (Figure 2C), which demonstrated that the two Kncn knockout mouse lines were successfully generated using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technique. In the following work, we used Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice for detailed analysis for reason of data consistency.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Generation and characterization of Kncn knockout mice. (A) Schematic drawing of generation of Kncn knockout mice via CRIPSR/Cas9 methods. Targeting sites of Kncn gene was in the middle of Exon 1. Two of knockout lines were used in this study, in which one line possessed a 1bp deletion (Kncn^{−1bp/−1bp}) and another line had a 16bp deletion (Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}), both resulting in frame shift mutation of encoded protein with early stop. Red bar marked location of the targeting guide RNA (gRNA). Dash indicted deleted nucleotide and asterisk noted a premature stop codon. The mis-translation of amino acids was shown in red. (B) Sequencing chromatograms of wild-type, Kncn^{−1bp/−1bp} and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} homozygous mice. (C) Characterization of KNCN defect in Kncn^{−1bp/−1bp} and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} homozygous mice by KNCN antibody.

Hair Bundle Structure Is Normal in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} Mice

Given the previous report that Kncn is expressed in the cochlea, specifically in hair cell kinocilia (Leibovici et al., 2005), we used SEM to examine the ultrastructure of kinocilia at higher resolution. At P4, an age that animals still keep kinocilia structure, the hair bundle structure of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice represented by SEM was rather indistinguishable comparing to that of the control mice, no matter where in apical, middle and basal turns (Figure 3A). Moreover, there was no obvious defect of stereocilia and kinocilia revealed by SEM in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice. Similarly, the stereocilia and kinocilia of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice recognized by phalloidin and tubulin antibody were normally organized in different cochlear turns (Figure 3B). These data demonstrated that the hair bundle structure of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice was still normal in morphology.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Microstructure of hair bundle of the kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice at P4. (A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of hair bundles in hair cells from the apical, middle, basal turn. Kinocilia was developed normally at this age. (B) Imaging of immunostaining micrograph of stereocilia and kinocilia of hair cells in the apical, middle and basal turn. Scale bar: 10 μm (A), 5 μm (B).

MET of OHCs Is Intact in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} Mice

We speculated that lack of KNCN might not induce obvious structure deficit but affect hair bundle related function. To further investigate whether KNCN contributes to the MET, we used whole-cell patch-clamp technique to record OHCs in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice. To elicit MET response, the hair bundle was deflected by a fluid-jet that is considered to generate saturated mechanical stimulation. The MET currents of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} OHCs were not affected comparing to the control at apical, middle and basal coils (Figures 4A,B). Together, our electrophysiological study suggested that the OHCs of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice had normal MET responsibility.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Mechanotransduction (MET) current of outer hair cells (OHCs) is not affected in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}mice. (A) Representative traces showed MET currents induced by fluid jet stimulation in the cochlear OHCs of control (black) and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} (red) mice. In this case, middle cochlear OHCs were recorded. (B) Summary of saturated MET currents from all recorded OHCs from control and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice similar to that in (A). Apical: control, 586.4 ± 44.88 pA and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}, 605.8 ± 43.32 pA. Middle: control, 827.2 ± 18.7 pA and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}, 811.7 ± 23.67 pA. Basal: control, 891.2 ± 32 pA and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}, 881.6 ± 26.21 pA. N number was marked on each bar. There was no significant difference. Data were presented as mean ± SEM.

Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} Mice Show No Obvious Hearing Loss

The auditory function of Kncn knockout mice was further evaluated by audiometry. The click ABR measurement at the age of 3 months showed no obvious hearing loss in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice. The hearing threshold of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice was similar to their heterozygous siblings, both around 40 dB (Figures 5A,B). Similarly, the hearing was still comparable to control when knockout mice get old at 7 months (data not shown). We further examined the pure-tone ABR and found no frequency specific defect in Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice (Figure 5C). It prompted that omitting KNCN likely did not affect the auditory transduction.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Auditory-brainstem response (ABR) measurement of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice. (A) Representative ABR traces of littermate control and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice at 3 month in response to a click sound stimulation. The hearing threshold of Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice was not altered obviously comparing to the wild type control. (B) Statistics of click ABR threshold of wild-type and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice from recordings similar to (A). Control (36.7 ± 1.7 dB SPL, n = 7); Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} (38.3 ± 4 dB SPL, n = 5). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. (C) Statistics of pure-tone ABR threshold of control and Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp} mice. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. And no significance observed.

Discussion

KNCN expression was detected in both cochlear and vestibular hair cells (Liu et al., 2014; Scheffer et al., 2015). Its ortholog was also detected in zebrafish hair cells (Barta et al., 2018). KNCN is thought to play a role in stabilizing dense microtubular networks or in vesicular trafficking and is thus speculated that deletion and/or mutations of Kncn would lead to abnormal kinocilium morphogenesis as microtubules are major components in kinocilium, stereocilium and apical surface of hair cells and supporting cells (Leibovici et al., 2005). We generated Kncn knockout mice to examine its role in hair bundle formation and maintenance as well as in MET. Two different types of knockout mice with different insert/deletions in the Kncn gene were generated. We examined bundle morphology and MET in cochlear hair cells from neonatal mice. Based on our detailed study on one knockout line, Kncn^{−16bp/−16bp}, deletion of Kncn has no effect on formation of kinocilium and morphogenesis of stereociliary bundles (Figure 3) and MET (Figure 4), and KNCN deletion does not lead to phenotypical changes in hearing threshold in terms of ABR at 3-month-old mice (Figure 5). We also examined ABR-based hearing threshold in mice at 7 months and observed no abnormality of hearing either, suggesting that KNCN may not be involved in vesicular trafficking in hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons.

Although Kncn is highly expressed in all hair cells and KNCN is detected initially in kinocilium during stereocilia bundle morphogenesis and late in cuticular plate of hair cells and some supporting cells (Leibovici et al., 2005), it appears that KNCN is not essential for kinocilium formation and morphogenesis of hair bundles. Lack of auditory defects also suggests that it is not a key player for stabilizing dense microtubular networks or in vesicular trafficking in hair cells and supporting cells. We entertain two possibilities for the lack of phenotypical changes in kinocilia and stereocilia bundle morphology. First, although KNCN is a component of kinocilium, it does not play a major role in kinocilium structure and function. This is likely as deletion of KNCN results in no change in kinocilium- and stereocilium-based bundle formation. Although kinocilium in cochlear hair cells is only transiently existed in cochlear hair cells and regresses from developing auditory hair cells before hair cells are functionally and morphologically mature before P12, the presence of kinocilium in nascent hair cells (examined at P4) suggests that kinocilium formation is not altered after Kncn is deleted. The conclusion is the same for vestibular hair cells although kinocilium is present in vestibular hair cells in both nascent and adult mice. The second possibility is that KNCN is an important component but the lack of phenotype is due to compensation of KNCN by other microtubules-related proteins that are not appreciated yet. As such a highly dynamic structure, many components responsible for its microtubule assembly and disassembly, polarization, kinociliary link regulation and ciliary transportation are still elusive (Sobkowicz et al., 1995; Zine et al., 1995; Zheng et al., 2000; Daudet and Lebart, 2002; Frolenkov et al., 2004; Tsujikawa and Malicki, 2004; Goodyear et al., 2005). KNCN may be only one of them as a complicated kinociliary machinery that can recruit alternative components for kinocilium function when KNCN is omitted. Hence, it is important that many aspects concerning kinocilium constitution and function need a further and thorough study.

Author Contributions

QH, LG, JL and CS carried out the experiments. LY, DH and WX planned the work and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571080 and 31522025 to WX; 81170905 and 81070780 to LY).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

1. ^ http://crispr.mit.edu/

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnmol.2018.00326/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1 | Analysis of Kncn expression. (A) RT-PCR study of Kncn mRNA level in different tissues from P7 mice. The positive band for Kncn was 405bp. Abbreviation: M, maker; BM, basilar membrane; SV, stria vascularis; Cere, cerebellum; H, heart; K, kidney; L, liver. (B) ISH analysis of Kncn mRNA expression in cochlear sections from P4 mice. Panels showed the sense and anti-sense probe staining in the organ of Corti and hair cells.

TABLE S1 | List of primers used in the study.

References

Barta, C. L., Liu, H. Z., Chen, L., Giffen, K. P., Li, Y., Kramer, K. L., et al. (2018). Data descriptor: RNA-seq transcriptomic analysis of adult zebrafish inner ear hair cells. Sci Data 5:180005. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, J., Zhang, X., Li, J., Song, C., Jia, Y., and Xiong, W. (2016). Identification of a novel ENU-Induced mutation in mouse Tbx1 linked to human digeorge syndrome. Neural Plast. 2016:5836143. doi: 10.1155/2016/5836143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daudet, N., and Lebart, M. C. (2002). Transient expression of the T-isoform of plastins/fimbrin in the stereocilia of developing auditory hair cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 53, 326–336. doi: 10.1002/cm.10092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fettiplace, R., and Hackney, C. M. (2006). The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 19–29. doi: 10.1038/nrn1828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flock, Å. (1971). “Sensory transduction in hair cells,” in Principles of Receptor Physiology, Handbook of Sensory Physiology, ed. W. R. Loewenstein (London: Academic Press), 396–441. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-65063-5_14

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frolenkov, G. I., Belyantseva, I. A., Friedman, T. B., and Griffith, A. J. (2004). Genetic insights into the morphogenesis of inner ear hair cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 489–498. doi: 10.1038/nrg1377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goodyear, R. J., Marcotti, W., Kros, C. J., and Richardson, G. P. (2005). Development and properties of stereociliary link types in hair cells of the mouse cochlea. J. Comp. Neurol 485, 75–85. doi: 10.1002/cne.20513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grillet, N., Xiong, W., Reynolds, A., Kazmierczak, P., Sato, T., Lillo, C., et al. (2009). Harmonin mutations cause mechanotransduction defects in cochlear hair cells. Neuron 62, 375–387. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudspeth, A. J. (2013). SnapShot: auditory transduction. Neuron 80:536.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudspeth, A. J., and Corey, D. P. (1977). Sensitivity, polarity and conductance change in the response of vertebrate hair cells to controlled mechanical stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 74, 2407–2411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hudspeth, A. J., and Jacobs, R. (1979). Stereocilia mediate transduction in vertebrate hair cells (auditory system/cilium/vestibular system). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 76, 1506–1509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kachar, B., Parakkal, M., Kurc, M., Zhao, Y., and Gillespie, P. G. (2000). High-resolution structure of hair-cell tip links. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 97, 13336–13341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.24.13336

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kazmierczak, P., Sakaguchi, H., Tokita, J., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M., Milligan, R. A., Muller, U., et al. (2007). Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip-link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature 449, 87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature06091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelley, M. W., Ochiai, C. K., and Corwin, J. T. (1992). Maturation of kinocilia in amphibian hair-cells—Growth and shortening related to kinociliary bulb formation. Hear Res. 59, 108–115.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Kikuchi, T., Tonosaki, A., and Takasaka, T. (1988). Development of apical-surface structures of mouse otic placode. Acta Otolaryngol. 106, 200–207. doi: 10.3109/00016488809106426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leibovici, M., Verpy, E., Goodyear, R. J., Zwaenepoel, I., Blanchard, S., Lainé, S., et al. (2005). Initial characterization of kinocilin, a protein of the hair cell kinocilium. Hear. Res. 203, 144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H., Pecka, J. L., Zhang, Q., Soukup, G. A., Beisel, K. W., He, D. Z., et al. (2014). Characterization of transcriptomes of cochlear inner and outer hair cells. J. Neurosci. 34, 11085–11095. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1690-14.2014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pickles, J. O., Comis, S. D., and Osborne, M. P. (1984). Cross-Links between stereocilia in the Guinea-Pig organ of corti and their possible relation to sensory transduction. Hear. Res. 15, 103–112. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90041-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scheffer, D. I., Shen, J., Corey, D. P., and Chen, Z. Y. (2015). Gene expression by mouse inner ear hair cells during development. J. Neurosci. 35, 6366–6380. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.5126-14.2015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siemens, J., Lillo, C., Dumont, R. A., Reynolds, A., Williams, D. S., Gillespie, P. G., et al. (2004). Cadherin 23 is a component of the tip link in hair-cell stereocilia. Nature 428, 950–955. doi: 10.1038/nature02483

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sobkowicz, H. M., Slapnick, S. M., and August, B. K. (1995). The kinocilium of auditory hair-cells and evidence for its morphogenetic role during the regeneration of stereocilia and cuticular plates. J. Neurocytol. 24, 633–653. doi: 10.1007/bf01179815

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tilney, L. G., and Tilney, M. S. (1986). Functional organization of the cytoskeleton. Hear. Res. 22, 55–77. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90077-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tilney, M. S., Tilney, L. G., Stephens, R. E., Merte, C., Drenckhahn, D., Cotanche, D. A., et al. (1989). Preliminary biochemical characterization of the stereocilia and cuticular plate of hair cells of the chick cochlea. J. Cell Biol. 109, 1711–1723. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1711

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsujikawa, M., and Malicki, J. (2004). Intraflagellar transport genes are essential for differentiation and survival of vertebrate sensory neurons. Neuron 42, 703–716. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00268-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Webb, S. W., Grillet, N., Andrade, L. R., Xiong, W., Swarthout, L., Della Santina, C. C., et al. (2011). Regulation of PCDH15 function in mechanosensory hair cells by alternative splicing of the cytoplasmic domain. Development 138, 1607–1617. doi: 10.1242/dev.060061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, W., Grillet, N., Elledge, H. M., Wagner, T. F., Zhao, B., Johnson, K. R., et al. (2012). TMHS is an integral component of the mechanotransduction machinery of cochlear hair cells. Cell 151, 1283–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, L. L., Sekerková, G., Vranich, K., Tilney, L. G., Mugnaini, E., and Bartles, J. R. (2000). The deaf jerker mouse has a mutation in the gene encoding the espin actin-bundling proteins of hair cell stereocilia and lacks espins. Cell 102, 377–385. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00042-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zine, A., Hafidi, A., and Romand, R. (1995). Fimbrin expression in the developing rat cochlea. Hear. Res. 87, 165–169. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00088-l

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar