%A Splinter,Mona %A Bostel,Tilman %A Sachpazidis,Ilias %A Fechter,Tobias %A Zamboglou,Constantinos %A Jäkel,Oliver %A Huber,Peter E. %A Debus,Jürgen %A Baltas,Dimos %A Nicolay,Nils H. %D 2019 %J Frontiers in Oncology %C %F %G English %K prostate cancer,prostatic fossa,Post-prostatectomy radiotherapy,Image-guided radiotherapy,Dosimetry,Normal tissue complication probability %Q %R 10.3389/fonc.2019.01191 %W %L %M %P %7 %8 2019-November-08 %9 Original Research %# %! Dosimetric variability of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy %* %< %T Dosimetric Impact of Interfractional Variations for Post-prostatectomy Radiotherapy to the Prostatic Fossa—Relevance for the Frequency of Position Verification Imaging and Treatment Adaptation %U https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.01191 %V 9 %0 JOURNAL ARTICLE %@ 2234-943X %X Background and purpose: To analyze divergences between the planned and applied treatment doses for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa on a voxel-by-voxel basis based on interfractional anatomic variations and imaging frequency.Materials and methods: For 10 patients receiving intensity-modulated postoperative radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa, position verification was carried out by daily in-room CT imaging in treatment position (340 fraction CTs). Applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily CT scans, and treatment doses were accumulated on a voxel-by-voxel basis after deformable image registration. To simulate weekly imaging, derived weekly position correction vectors were used to rigidly register all daily scans of the respective treatment week onto the planning CT before dose accumulation. Detailed dose statistics of the prescribed and applied treatment doses were compared in relation to the frequency of position verification imaging. Derived NTCP and Pinjury values were calculated for the rectum and bladder.Results: Despite a large variability in the pelvic anatomy, daily CT-based patient repositioning resulted in largely negligible deviations of the analyzed dose-volume, conformity, and uniformity parameters from the planned doses for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy, and only the bladder exhibited significant increases in the accumulated mean and median doses. Derived NTCP for the applied doses to the rectum and bladder and Pinjury values did not significantly deviate from the treatment plan. In contrast, weekly CT-based repositioning resulted in significant decreases of the PTV coverage and dose conformity as well as large deviations of the applied doses to the rectum and bladder from the planned doses. Consecutively, NTCP for the rectum and Pinjury were found falsely reduced for weekly patient repositioning.Conclusions: Our data indicate for the first time in a voxel-by-voxel analysis that daily imaging is required for reliable adaptive delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the prostatic fossa. This work will help guiding adaptive treatment strategies for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy.