Monitoring and Managing BTK Inhibitor Treatment-Related Adverse Events in Clinical Practice

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors represent an important therapeutic advancement for B cell malignancies. Ibrutinib, the first-in-class BTK inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; after ≥1 prior therapy); and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for adult patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL and patients with CLL. Ibrutinib treatment can be limited by adverse events (AEs) including atrial fibrillation, arthralgias, rash, diarrhea, and bleeding events, leading to drug discontinuation in 4%–26% of patients. Acalabrutinib, a second-generation BTK inhibitor, is approved by the FDA to treat adult patients with CLL/SLL or MCL (relapsed after 1 prior therapy); and by the EMA to treat adult patients with CLL or R/R MCL. The most common AE associated with acalabrutinib is headache of limited duration, which occurs in 22%–51% of patients, and is mainly grade 1–2 in severity, with only 1% of patients experiencing grade ≥3 headache. Furthermore, acalabrutinib is associated with a low incidence of atrial fibrillation. Zanubrutinib, a selective next-generation covalent BTK inhibitor, is approved by the FDA to treat adult patients with MCL who have received ≥1 prior therapy, and is under investigation for the treatment of patients with CLL. In the phase 3 SEQUOIA trial in patients with CLL, the most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased and infections. This review provides an overview of BTK inhibitor-related AEs in patients with CLL, and strategies for their management.


INTRODUCTION
Ibrutinib, the first-in-class Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) after at least 1 prior therapy, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma in patients who have received at least 1 prior anti-CD20-based therapy, and chronic graft-versus-host disease after failure of at least 1 systemic therapy (1); and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MCL, and patients with CLL (2). Ibrutinib consistently demonstrated benefit in clinical trials, with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLL/ SLL and R/R MCL, compared to outcomes with conventional therapies (3,4). However, ibrutinib treatment can be limited by adverse events (AEs) including atrial fibrillation, arthralgias, rash, diarrhea, and bleeding events (3,5,6) leading to drug discontinuation in 4% to 26% of patients (3,6).
Acalabrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor approved by the US FDA for the treatment of patients with CLL/SLL, and patients with MCL who have received at least 1 prior therapy (7), and by the EMA for patients with CLL (8). Zanubrutinib is a selective next-generation covalent BTK inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with MCL who have received at least 1 prior therapy (9); it is under investigation for the treatment of patients with CLL (10,11). This review will discuss the mechanisms of BTK inhibition, review AEs associated with ibrutinib therapy, together with their possible underlying molecular basis, and AEs reported with acalabrutinib therapy in patients with CLL, including recommendations for the management of acalabrutinib-related AEs. Acalabrutinibassociated AEs will be described using data from the phase 3 ASCEND (12) and ELEVATE-TN (13) trials, long-term safety data from the phase 2 ACE-CL-001 study in patients with CLL who were either treatment naïve or who became R/R (14,15), and from reports of the most common acalabrutinib-related AEs observed in clinical practice. AEs associated with the use of zanubrutinib in the treatment of patients with treatment-naïve or R/R CLL will also be presented (10,11). In addition, we will discuss AE management strategies based on the authors' experiences.

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF BTK INHIBITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF CLL/SLL
Targeting key signaling proteins responsible for driving cancer cell growth and differentiation has provided a revolution in cancer drug development. The B cell receptor (BCR)-signaling pathway is fundamental to CLL cell growth and survival; hence, antagonists have proven highly effective for the treatment of patients with CLL (16). In normal B cells, BCR ligation first induces activation, proliferation, and expansion. Certain B cells generate plasma cells, while others become anergic or undergo apoptosis (17,18). Following antigen stimulation and activation, certain B cells become memory B cells, and stop proliferation and differentiation (18). When these memory B cells subsequently reencounter the same antigen, they are activated and proliferate and differentiate into plasma cells (18). In CLL, there is chronic stimulation through the BCR-signaling pathway leading to proliferation, propagation, and increased prosurvival signals, contributing to expansion and prolonged survival of clonal B cells (19). BTK is an important downstream protein in the BCRsignaling pathway, and plays a major role in immune regulation, as indicated by the severe immunodeficiency occurring in patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) who do not express BTK due to the presence of a mutation in this gene (20)(21)(22). BTK is uniformly overexpressed at the transcriptional level and constitutively phosphorylated in patients with CLL (19).
BTK is not only a signaling component downstream of the BCRsignaling pathway but it is also involved in additional signaling pathways (i.e., chemokine receptor [e.g., CXCR4], Toll-like receptor [TLR], and activating Fcg receptor signaling [e.g., FcgRI]) (23). Upon chemokine binding to the extracellular domain of G-proteincoupled chemokine receptors, a conformation change leads to dissociation of the Ga and Gbg subunits, which independently activate phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), leading to activation of BTK, protein kinase B (AKT), and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent pathways (23 (23). These interact with BTK to induce nuclear factor-ĸB (NFĸB) activation, leading to activation, proliferation, antibody secretion, and proinflammatory cytokine production in B cells (23). Following FcgRI cross-linking, Srckinases, SYK, PI3K-g, and BTK are activated, while inhibitory Fcreceptors (e.g., FcgRIIB) recruit phosphatases and reduce BTK activation (23). However, it is not clear if BTK inhibition interferes with the signaling of these various receptors.
All covalently binding BTK inhibitors currently in clinical use irreversibly bind to the cysteine at position 481 (CYS-481), blocking the ATP binding pocket of BTK, preventing autophosphorylation at tyrosine residue 223 and full BTK activation (24). Ibrutinib is a highly potent, irreversible BTK inhibitor, which is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, with a pharmacodynamic profile that is maintained over a 24-hour period (25). Ibrutinib also irreversibly binds other kinases possessing an analogous cysteine with varying affinity (interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase [ITK] and tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma [TEC]-family kinases), thereby potentially disrupting normal T-cell, macrophage, and platelet function (15,24,26,27). These off-target effects may influence the AE profile associated with ibrutinib therapy (26) ( Figure 1); bleeding is attributed to effects on BTK and TEC; rash and diarrhea are possibly related to effects on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), while a molecular target leading to the development of atrial fibrillation has been shown to be the C-terminal Src kinase (CSK) (28) (Figure 1).
Based on the toxicity profile observed with ibrutinib, more selective second-generation BTK inhibitors were developed for the treatment of hematological malignancies (7,24). Acalabrutinib is a highly selective, potent, second-generation BTK inhibitor, with reduced off-target activity (12,15), rapid absorption, and a short pharmacokinetic half-life (15). An advantage of a short half-life is that there is no lasting impact upon noncovalently bound enzymes. Furthermore, acalabrutinib has an extended pharmacodynamic response (15), such that in patients with B cell malignancies, a 100-mg dose of acalabrutinib every 12 hours led to a mean steady-state BTK occupancy of ≥95% in peripheral blood cells, which was maintained over the 12-hour period, thereby ensuring BTK inhibition during the entire dosing period (7). Acalabrutinib, and its major active metabolite, ACP-5862, form a covalent bond with the CYS-481 residue in the active site of BTK, thereby irreversibly inhibiting BTK enzymatic activity (7,31). In preclinical studies, acalabrutinib inhibited BTK-mediated activation of downstream signaling proteins; and in mouse xenograft models, acalabrutinib inhibited malignant B cell proliferation and tumor growth (7). Further, acalabrutinib does not inhibit Src-family kinases, and demonstrated less inhibition of TEC kinases compared with that observed with ibrutinib, and displayed no in vitro activity against EGFR or ERBB2 (27) ( Table 1), consistent with a low frequency of skin rash and diarrhea (27). However, exposure of acalabrutinib is decreased in the presence of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), with a 43% reduction in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) observed with coadministration of 40 mg omeprazole for 5 days (7). Consequently, patients are advised to avoid coadministration of acalabrutinib with PPIs (7).
The mean steady-state BTK occupancy by zanubrutinib in peripheral blood was maintained at 100% over 24 hours at a dose of 320 mg once daily in patients with B cell malignancies (9). In vitro half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) values for zanubrutinib for off-target kinases and BTK are presented in Table 1 (32). The median T max of zanubrutinib is 2 hours, and mean half-life is 2-4 hours following a single oral dose of 160 mg or 320 mg. No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of zanubrutinib were observed when coadministered with PPIs (9).  (27), and are presented as the mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments. b Data are reproduced with permission from reference (32) and represent triplicate determinations except where noted. c n = 1 determination.
B-lymphoid tyrosine kinase; BMX, bone marrow kinase on X; BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; BLK, EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase; ERBB4, Erb-B4 receptor tyrosine kinase; IC 50 , half-maximal inhibitory concentration; ITK, interleukin-2 inducible T-cell kinase; JAK3, Janus kinase 3; TEC, tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma; TXK, nonreceptor tyrosine protein kinase encoded by the TXK gene. FIGURE 1 | Reported molecular targets of ibrutinib and their associated adverse events. In addition to covalently binding to BTK, ibrutinib also targets other cellular processes regulated by other kinases including EGFR, and TEC family kinases, thereby disrupting normal T-lymphocyte, macrophage, and platelet function (15,24,26). Ibrutinib also inhibits other enzymes that contain cysteine residues that are homologous to CYS-481 present within BTK (27). Collectively, these additional off-target effects on cellular process are thought to influence the adverse event profile associated with ibrutinib therapy (26). Bleeding is attributed to effects on BTK and TEC family proteins; rash and diarrhea are related to effects on EGFR; and the molecular target leading to the development of atrial fibrillation is CSK (28). a Data are from reference (29). b Data are from reference (30). c Kinases that contain a cysteine residue that aligns with CYS-481 are present in BTK (29). BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; CSK, C-terminal Src kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; IC 50 , the half maximal inhibitory concentration; TEC, tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma.

ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH BTK INHIBITOR THERAPY OBSERVED IN CLINICAL TRIALS
The efficacy and safety of ibrutinib was evaluated in 3 pivotal phase 3 trials: RESONATE (5), RESONATE-2 (3), and ILLUMINATE (33).
The efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib in patients with CLL were investigated in 2 pivotal phase 3 studies: ELEVATE-TN (13) and ASCEND (12).
The phase 3 head-to-head comparison to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated patients with high-risk CLL was recently completed (NCT02477696; ELEVATE-RR) (34). Patient median age was 66 years (range, 28-89) (34). The results demonstrated that acalabrutinib met the primary efficacy endpoint with noninferior PFS compared to ibrutinib in previously treated patients with high-risk CLL after a median follow-up period of 40.9 months (range, 0.0-59.1) (34). The key secondary endpoint for safety was also met, with a statistically significant lower incidence of atrial fibrillation with acalabrutinib compared to that seen with ibrutinib (9.4% vs 16.0%, P = 0.02) (34). Acalabrutinib treatment was also associated with a lower incidence of any-grade hypertension compared with ibrutinib (8.6% vs 22.8%), as well as incidences of arthralgia (15.8% vs 22.8%) and diarrhea (34.6% vs 46.0%), but there was a higher incidence of headache (34.6% vs 20.2%) and cough (28.9% vs 21.3%) (34). Overall, AEs leading to discontinuation were numerically lower in acalabrutinib-treated patients compared with ibrutinib-treated patients (14.7% vs 21.3%) (34).
The ALPINE trial was an open-label, global, randomized, phase 3 study that compared zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib treatment in patients with R/R CLL/SLL (NCT03734016) (35,36). Data from a pre planned interim analysis for the first 12 months after randomization of the first 415 patients was recently reported (35,36). Patients ≥65 years of age comprised 62.3% of the zanubrutinibtreated group and 61.5% of the ibrutinib-treated group (35). With a median follow-up period of 15 months, grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 55.9% of patients in the zanubrutinib group compared with 51.2% of patients in the ibrutinib group (37). Atrial fibrillation/flutter, a prespecified safety endpoint, was observed at lower rates in patients in the zanubrutinib group versus the ibrutinib group (2.5% vs 10.1%, respectively, P = 0.0014) (35). Rates of other AEs that were lower in the zanubrutinib group versus the ibrutinib group included major bleeding (2.9% vs 3.9%), cardiac disorders of any grade (13.7% vs 25.1%) or grade ≥3 (2.5% vs 6.8%), and AEs leading to discontinuation (7.8% vs 13.0%) or death (3.9% vs 5.8%), respectively (35,37). The rate of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib treatment (28.4% vs 21.7%, respectively); however, grade ≥3 infections were lower with zanubrutinib than with ibrutinib (12.7% vs 17.9%, respectively) (35). Because this is an interim analysis, additional data are needed before these results can be fully evaluated.

MANAGING BTK INHIBITOR-INDUCED AEs IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Headache, occurring in 22% to 51% of patients, is the most common AE experienced by patients receiving acalabrutinib therapy (12,13,15). Acalabrutinib treatment-related headaches usually occur early in the course of treatment, are mild, and of limited duration (38). These headaches typically occur within 30 minutes of dosing and in many cases do not need medical intervention, or can be effectively managed with acetaminophen or caffeine, while avoiding the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), if possible ( Table 2) (39). Only 1% of headaches lead to treatment discontinuation (12). In clinical practice, patient education prior to initiation of therapy (i.e., advising that acalabrutinib-induced headaches are easily managed and should abate over a period of up to 4 weeks) helps to reassure the patient that it is not a long-term consequence. The mechanism(s) for these headaches is unclear, but could include calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) agonism, which is of interest given the new class of migraine medications designed to work by antagonizing CGRP (42).
Atrial fibrillation has been reported in 6%-10% of untreated patients with CLL (43)(44)(45). Furthermore, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation increases with age (46). In clinical trials, the incidence rate of atrial fibrillation with ibrutinib treatment, after a 9-month follow-up, was 3% (5), and 6% after a median follow-up of 18 months (3); the 2-year incidence rate-based on randomized and observational studies-was estimated at between 10%-16% (44,47). With a follow-up ranging from 14 to 28 months in clinical trials, the incidence rate of atrial fibrillation with acalabrutinib was approximately 0%-5% (12,13,48), with a time to onset of atrial fibrillation in the range of 23 days to >1-3 years after treatment initiation (15). The slope is slightly higher in the first 6 months, but is then stable, perhaps suggesting minimal risk associated with drug initiation. Monitoring for atrial fibrillation while receiving acalabrutinib therapy is indicated (7). Appropriate management of atrial fibrillation, such as the administration of direct oral anticoagulants, is recommended without necessarily withholding acalabrutinib, and discontinuation should be considered if the atrial fibrillation is not medically controllable ( Table 2) (39).
Grade ≥3 hypertension was reported in 38% of patients treated with ibrutinib, including 18% in patients who did not have previous hypertension at baseline (49). In contrast, grade ≥3 hypertension was reported in 2%-7% of patients treated with acalabrutinib, with a median follow-up ranging from 14 to 28 months (12,13,48). Further, the updated results from the long-term follow-up (41 months) of the ACE-CL-001 phase 2 study, reported that 18% of patients experienced hypertension (all grades), 10% of which were grade 1-2, and 7% were grade ≥3 (15). In patients treated with ibrutinib, hypertension (all grades) was observed in 14% of patients; 4% of which were grade 3, after a median follow-up of 18 months (3). Patients should be monitored for treatment-emergent hypertension, which should be managed with antihypertensive medication ( Table 2). It should be noted that antihypertensive medication dosages may need to be adjusted once any BTK inhibitor therapy is discontinued.
Although a moderate incidence of diarrhea was reported with acalabrutinib treatment in clinical trials and in a long-term followup study (18%-52%) (12,13,15), it appeared not to be drugrelated. Diarrhea usually resolves quickly without the need for further intervention. If intervention is required, patients can be simply treated with an antidiarrheal medication (e.g., loperamide) ( Table 2) (40).
Thrombocytopenia is frequently observed in patients with unfavorable biological risk factors for CLL, and is commonly caused by splenomegaly, bone marrow failure secondary to tumor infiltration, recent chemotherapy, or megakaryocyte dysplasia (50).  (1,7,9) Musculoskeletal pain (myalgia, arthralgia, etc) • Grade 1 myalgias/arthralgias may not need intervention • Dose reduction or dose interruption should be used as appropriate (41) Neutropenia • First to third occurrence of grade 3 or 4: dose interruptions are recommended • Fourth occurrence: discontinuation of BTK inhibitor is recommended (7,9) Thrombocytopenia • First to third occurrence of grade 3 or 4: dose interruptions are recommended • Fourth occurrence: discontinuation of BTK inhibitor is recommended (unless thrombocytopenia is related to CLL infiltration of the bone marrow) BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.
In patients with CLL who were treated with acalabrutinib monotherapy, thrombocytopenia of any grade and grade ≥3 were reported in 7%-11% and 3%-4% of patients, respectively (12,13). In patients with R/R CLL who were treated with zanubrutinib, allgrade and grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was reported in 42% and 15% of patients, respectively (11). Thrombocytopenia (all grades) was reported in 6% of patients with treatment-naïve CLL who were treated with zanubrutinib, with 1% of cases of grade ≥3 severity (10). Dose interruptions are recommended for the first to third occurrences of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and dose discontinuation is recommended for the fourth occurrence, unless thrombocytopenia is related to CLL infiltration of the marrow ( Table 2) (7,9). Neutropenia is also commonly observed in patients treated with BTK inhibitors due to an on-target toxicity effect (11). Between 10%-16% of patients treated with acalabrutinib monotherapy developed grade ≥3 neutropenia, although this number can be higher with combination therapies (e.g., 30% of patients experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia when treated with acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab) (12,13,26). When treated with ibrutinib, 10% of patients experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia (3); and 44% of patients treated with zanubrutinib experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia (11). As with thrombocytopenia, dose interruptions are recommended for the first to third occurrences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and dose discontinuation is recommended after a fourth occurrence (Table 2) (7,9).
Infections were common in patients with CLL who were treated with zanubrutinib; 39% of patients with R/R CLL reported ≥1 grade ≥3 infection (11), and 64% of patients with treatment-naive CLL reported an infection of any grade, 13.8% of which were grade ≥3 (10). Most were respiratory tract infections and were effectively managed without the need for a dose reduction or treatment discontinuation (11). Grade ≥3 infections occurred at similar rates in patients receiving acalabrutinib monotherapy (14%) (13). However, 17.9% of ibrutinib-treated patients developed grade ≥3 infections (35). Prophylactic treatment should be considered for patients at a higher risk of developing opportunistic infections, and all patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of infection and treated promptly ( Table 2) (1,7,9).
Monitoring for signs of bleeding is important in patients receiving acalabrutinib therapy (7). Data suggest that BTK inhibitors increase the risk of bleeding by impairing collageninduced platelet activation, akin to the effects of aspirin (51,52). Inhibition of Src-kinases is suggested to be associated with bleeding (52). Acalabrutinib has less inhibitory potential with respect to Src-family kinases compared with that seen with ibrutinib ( Table 1) (27). Preliminary studies suggest that BTK and TEC kinases have overlapping roles in platelets, which would explain why patients with XLA do not demonstrate a bleeding phenotype (53,54). In ibrutinib-treated and acalabrutinib-treated patients, BTK and TEC kinases are both irreversibly inhibited (52). The lower affinity of acalabrutinib for TEC kinase (53) may preserve some platelet activity. Further, differences in bleeding events may be related to a greater selectivity of acalabrutinib for BTK over TEC compared to ibrutinib (54). Minor bleeding tends to be less evident, and patients treated with acalabrutinib report fewer minor bleeding occurrences. There is also evidence that major bleeding events are rare in patients treated with acalabrutinib (54). However, in our experience, the risk for a major bleeding event is equal for both acalabrutinib and ibrutinib. The risk of bleeding in acalabrutinibtreated patients can be mitigated as for those treated with ibrutinib. Further, in patients with treatment-naive CLL, grade 1/2 minor bleeding was observed in 27% of patients, and grade ≥3 major bleeding was observed in 5% of patients-2 of whom experienced a grade 3 major bleeding event following a surgical procedure for which there was no per protocol dose hold (10). Minor bleeding events were relatively common in patients with R/ R CLL treated with zanubrutinib: 1% of patients experienced grade 1-2 major bleeding, and 1% of patients experienced grade ≥3 major bleeding (gastrointestinal hemorrhage following diagnosis of colon cancer, and posttraumatic right-thalamic hemorrhage) (11). Patients treated with warfarin were excluded early from the ibrutinib studies after complications, and, as such, coadministration of warfarin and acalabrutinib has not been studied. Jones and colleagues assessed the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents and bleeding events in patients with CLL who were treated with ibrutinib monotherapy in 2 multicenter studies (55). In the PCYC-1102 study (median follow-up of 22 months), 9% of patients who received ibrutinib treatment plus an anti-coagulant agent and 4% who received ibrutinib plus an antiplatelet agent reported a major bleeding event (55). In the RESONATE study with a median follow-up of 10 months, 2% and 1% of patients, respectively, reported a major bleeding event (55). Major bleeding events in these patients were typically observed in conjunction with other factors (i.e., coexisting medical conditions, concurrent medications) (55). Therefore, the risk-versus-benefit profile for coadministration of a BTK inhibitor with antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy should be carefully considered, and the patient should be monitored for signs of bleeding (Table 2) (7, 39). If anticoagulation therapy is required, we generally prefer to use direct oral anticoagulants ( Table 2). In addition, we recommend withholding acalabrutinib administration for 3 to 7 days before and after surgery, depending upon the type of surgery, and the potential risk of a bleeding event (Table 2) (7).
Although musculoskeletal pain, including myalgias and arthralgias, is a less serious AE reported with BTK inhibitor therapy, it can be troublesome for the patient and lead to treatment discontinuation (11,41). Musculoskeletal pain is one of the most common AEs (i.e., occurring in ≥30% of patients) observed with ibrutinib treatment (1). A retrospective analysis of patients with CLL who received ibrutinib treatment reported that 36% of patients developed new or worsening arthralgias/myalgias, with a median time to occurrence of 34.5 months (41). Musculoskeletal pain, of any grade, was reported in 14% of patients treated with zanubrutinib, with grade ≥3 AEs observed in 3.4% (9), and myalgia was also observed in acalabrutinib-treated patients (all grades, 21%; grade ≥3, 0.8%) (7). Interrupting ibrutinib therapy, as recommended, alleviated symptoms in 14% of patients, while a dose reduction alleviated symptoms in 60% of patients (41). Although avoiding the use of NSAIDs has been recommended because this class of drugs may exacerbate the risk of bleeding, 50% of patients who used NSAIDs reported improvements in arthralgia/ myalgia symptoms (41). Additionally, 54% of patients who developed arthralgias/myalgias had spontaneous resolution of their symptoms with no changes to ibrutinib treatment, although most patients had grade 1 arthralgias/myalgias (41). Ultimately 22% of patients with arthralgias/myalgias discontinued ibrutinib treatment; however, this increased to 63% in patients with grade 3 events (41).

DISCUSSION
Treatment options for patients with CLL have evolved considerably over recent years (39). Small-molecule inhibitorbased therapies have significantly improved PFS outcomes in patients with CLL compared with chemoimmunotherapy outcomes, especially in patients with high-risk disease characteristics (e.g., del(17p) or TP53 mutations) (39,56,57). Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology practice guidelines recommend that first-line treatment for patients with CLL should be based on the presence or absence of del(17p) or mutated TP53, regardless of patient age and comorbidities (39,58), and preference should be given to small molecules. The shift from chemoimmunotherapy to oral targeted therapy provides patients with CLL/SLL convenient options with fewer toxicities. However, since oral therapy can be administered away from the clinic, there must be vigilant monitoring of safety considerations and thorough adverse event management.
Acalabrutinib is well-tolerated and associated with low rates of treatment discontinuation due to AEs [8,9,18], which may provide some advantages in routine practice. However, patients taking proton-pump inhibitors might have impaired absorption of acalabrutinib (7).
Long-term data from the phase 2 ACE-CL-001 study reaffirmed that acalabrutinib monotherapy for patients with treatment-naïve and R/R CLL provided durable responses with a favorable safety profile, with no new safety concerns reported (14,15). Several clinically relevant AEs considered to be associated with BTK inhibition in the clinical setting appear to be present at a low frequency in patients treated with acalabrutinib. The most common AE associated with the use of acalabrutinib is a headache (12,13,26). Headaches are mild, easily managed, and of limited duration, lasting only a few days (39,59).
Zanubrutinib is associated with an overall favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of major bleeding or arrythmias observed in patients with CLL (60). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend the use of zanubrutinib as a first-line or second-line therapy for patients with CLL/SLL with del (17p)/TP53 mutations who have a contraindication to other BTK inhibitors, and as second-line and subsequent therapy for patients without del(17p)/TP53 mutations who are intolerant of, or have a contraindication to, other BTK inhibitors (61). However, zanubrutinib is currently approved by the FDA only for the treatment of MCL in patients who have received ≥1 prior therapy (9).
In summary, BTK inhibitors are highly effective options for the treatment of patients with CLL, and selection is driven by patient and physician personal choice, as well as available efficacy and tolerability data from clinical trials and clinician experience. Acalabrutinib is safe and effective and provides an additional FDA-approved option for the treatment of patients with CLL.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors contributed to the discussion of the content, reviewed each draft, and approved the final version for submission.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Medical writing and editorial support, conducted in accordance with Good Publication Practice 3 (GPP3) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines, were provided by Marie-Louise Ricketts, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis Inc., Newtown, PA, and funded by AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD.