Functional Genomics of PRUNE1 in Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs) Tied to Medulloblastoma (MB) and Other Tumors

We analyze the fundamental functions of Prune_1 in brain pathophysiology. We discuss the importance and maintenance of the function of Prune_1 and how its perturbation influences both brain pathological conditions, neurodevelopmental disorder with microcephaly, hypotonia, and variable brain anomalies (NMIHBA; OMIM: 617481), and tumorigenesis of medulloblastoma (MB) with functional correlations to other tumors. A therapeutic view underlying recent discoveries identified small molecules and cell penetrating peptides to impair the interaction of Prune_1 with protein partners (e.g., Nm23-H1), thus further impairing intracellular and extracellular signaling (i.e., canonical Wnt and TGF-β pathways). Identifying the mechanism of action of Prune_1 as responsible for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), we have recognized other genes which are found overexpressed in brain tumors (e.g., MB) with functional implications in neurodevelopmental processes, as mainly linked to changes in mitotic cell cycle processes. Thus, with Prune_1 being a significant target in NDDs, we discuss how its network of action can be dysregulated during brain development, thus generating cancer and metastatic dissemination.

INTRODUCTION PRUNE_1, the human homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster pn gene, was firstly identified by viable mutations responsible for the brunish purple eye color compared to the red of wild-type fly (1). The phenotype of pn mutant flies was due to alterations in the metabolism of drosopteridines (1). Interestingly, the same homozygous or hemizygous pn mutation became lethal when the protein encoded by abnormal wing disc (i.e., awd) gene was also mutated (i.e., p.P97S) (2). Awd is the homolog of the human NME1 gene encoding for the Nm23-H1 (or NDPK-A) protein, one of the known Prune_1 binders. In this regard, the double mutant flies died at the second/third larval developmental stage because of anomalies of mesoderm development and central nervous system (CNS)-like cells. Interestingly, the mutant p.P97S awd protein still retained the ability to bind Prune_1 protein (3). Thus, the "lethal interaction" between awd and pn mutant proteins was hypothesized to be due to neomorphic mutations unbalancing the switch from guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to guanosine diphosphate (GDP; mainly mediated by awd protein), thus causing alterations in the modulation of GTPases and/or GTPase-activating proteins (4).
Importantly, Prune-M1 and Nm23-M1 (the mouse homologs of the human PRUNE_1 and NME1 genes, respectively) showed significant co-expression patterns in the cortex, hippocampus, midbrain, and the cerebellum during murine neural development, thus suggesting a critical role for these proteins during neural development (5).
The human Prune_1 protein belongs to the DHH (Asp-His-His) protein superfamily (that also includes the pn protein of Drosophila and the RecJ exonuclease of bacteria) and possesses a nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) (6) and an exopolyphosphatase (exopolyphosphatase/pyrophosphatase, PPX/PPase) action, with greater affinity for short-chain over long-chain inorganic polyphosphates (polyPs) (7). Regarding its tertiary structure, human Prune_1 is a naturally unfolded protein with the ability to interact with several intracellular binding partners, including GSK-3b (8) and Nm23-H1/H2 (9). Furthermore, Prune_1 was also identified as a microtubuleassociated protein (MAP) with a role in the enhancement of microtubule (MT) polymerization in the mitotic spindle during cell division (10).
Because of the enzymatic activities and its interaction with several proteins, Prune_1 was found able to modulate both intraand extracellular signaling cascades [including the canonical Wnt (8) and TGF-b (11) pathways] that regulate cell proliferation, motility, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) processes.
To date, Prune_1 has been found highly expressed and positively correlated with the grading, EMT, and metastatic status in several tumors, including those of the CNS and the peripheral nervous system (PNS), and in medulloblastoma (MB) and neuroblastoma (NBL). Indeed, high expression levels of Prune_1 were found in metastatic MB (11), the most common childhood brain tumor. In MB group 3, Prune_1 drives a "metastatic axis," thus leading to the enhancement of the TGFb pathway, activation of EMT process, and the reduction of the amount of PTEN protein (11).
In this review, we will focus on the Prune_1 protein enzymatic activities, intracellular pathways, and protein interactors in the interplay between metastatic CSN tumor (i.e., MB) and NDD (i.e., NMIHBA) pathogenesis. In conclusion, we also highlight the use of Prune_1-inhibitors as new potential therapies for the treatment of brain tumors. In the near future, once the mechanisms have been identified, we will then use this knowledge to understand their use and potential application in therapeutic interventions also in NDDs.

PRUNE_1 ENZYMATIC ACTIVITIES
Prune_1 protein is part of DHH phosphoesterase superfamily. Its N-terminal domain contains the DHH motifs (6). Prune_1 retains two different enzymatic functions-PDE (6) and PPX/ PPase activities-the latest with an order of magnitude higher (7).

Phosphodiesterase Activity
Regarding PDE activity, Prune_1 has the ability to hydrolyze the second messengers adenosine and guanosine 3′,5′-cyclic nucleotides [i.e., cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)] in their corresponding 5′-monophosphates (i.e., 5′-AMP and 5′-GMP, respectively). cAMP has major affinity to Prune_1, then cGMP (K m values: cAMP, 0.9 ± 0.03 M; cGMP, 2.3 ± 0.11 M) (6). Phosphodiesterase enzymes have important roles in cellular homeostasis because of the pivotal functions of cAMP and cGMP (as second messengers) in physiological processes due to the modulation of signaling pathway transduction (21). Furthermore, Prune_1 PDE activity has been reported to enhance cell motility in vitro (6). In this regard, MBA-MB-435 cells that overexpressed mutant Prune_1 proteins lacking PDE activity [through amino acid changes within the region containing motif III (DHRP126-129AAAA, PruneD) were found with decreased migration rates (6). Furthermore, dipyridamole, a PDE inhibitor, was also found to affect the motility of breast cancer (BC) cells (i.e., MDA-MB231T) (22,23). These data, thus, suggest that the PDE enzymatic activity of Prune_1 protein may have a role in the modulation of the migratory properties of tumorigenic cells in which Prune_1 is overexpressed.

Exopolyphosphatase (PPX/PPase) Activity
The PPX/PPase (polyphosphate-phosphohydrolases) activity of Prune_1 was found to exceed its PDE function (7). Prune_1 has affinity for short-chain over long-chain inorganic polyPs. Indeed, it can hydrolyze linear polyPs by using Mg 2+ or Co 2+ as a cofactor. Among the inorganic polyPs with different chain lengths, the highest K cat values for Prune_1 were observed by using triphosphates (P3), adenosine 5′-tetraphosphate (AP4), and guanosine 5′-tetraphosphate (GP4) as substrates. These values dramatically decreased with polyPs at increased chain lengths. Interestingly, PPi, ATP, and GTP were not significantly hydrolyzed (7). Of importance is that loss of PPX/PPase activity was found in the recombinant mutants p.N24H, p.D28A, p.D179A, and p.R348A Prune_1 proteins when assayed in the presence of P3 and Mg 2+ as the substrate and cofactor, respectively. The other mutants, p.D106A, p.H107N, and p.H108N Prune_1 proteins, had reduced but measurable PPX/PPase activity. In contrast, the mutant p.R128H Prune_1 protein showed an increased K cat value in comparison with the wild-type protein (7). These results suggest that variations within the DHH domain (e.g., p.D106A, p.H107N, and p.H108N) did not affect the PPX/ PPase activity of Prune_1 (7). In contrast, the same PPX/ PPase enzymatic function resulted affected in mutant Prune_1 proteins containing variations in those residues conserved in PPase and PPX enzymes (i.e., p.D28A, p.D179A, and p.R348A) (7).
At this time, questions were raised about the potential role of PPX/PPase activity in cell motility. In this regard, a delayed migratory rate was shown in HaCaT cells overexpressing PPX1 (the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of the human PRUNE_1 gene) by performing would healing assays (24). However, different functions were also postulated due to the role that long-chain polyPs play in the induction of ERK1-2 (i.e., MAP kinase pathway) in human cells (25). Thus, how the PPX/PPAse activity of Prune_1 influences migratory processes and cell motility in both physiological conditions is still not fully understood (in the context of polyP degradation and/or organelle cellular compartment storage). Future research studies and discoveries will address these questions.
Inorganic polyPs are polymers of linear orthophosphate (Pi) units ranging from five and several thousand orthophosphates that are linked through phosphoanhydride bonds (one of the most energy-rich linkages). In human, their amounts are very high in blood plasma, platelets, and osteoblasts, where they modulate blood clotting (26), mineralization processes, and the regulation of ATP level (27). Thus, polyPs are involved in many functions mostly related to additional sources of energy into the cells. Interestingly, polyPs were found to act as cytoprotective agents against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (28). In this regard, very recently, polyPs have been found able to exert antiviral actions against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (29), during early phase of infection and replication (30).
Furthermore, high concentrations of polyPs were also found in mammalian brain, especially in astrocytes, where they were found to induce calcium signaling through P2Y1 purinergic receptors and phospholipase C induction, inositol 3 phosphate (IP3) delivery, and cytosolic Ca 2+ increase (31,32). Moreover, PolyPs were also reported to amplify the proinflammatory response in endothelial cells via the activation of the same P2Y1 receptor (33), thus overall modulating mitochondrial functions. In this regard, the depletion of mitochondrial polyPs (through the overexpression and the activity of yeast PPX) significantly increased the levels of orthophosphates in the mitochondrial matrix (which is necessary for Ca 2+ binding), thus resulting in a decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and the inhibition of complex I of the respiratory chain (34,35). Thus, the crucial role of polyPs in cell metabolism is clear, as also confirmed in transgenic mice widely expressing the scPPX1 exopolyphosphatase that displayed a reduced mitochondrial respiration in muscles (36).

PRUNE_1 PROTEIN INTERACTION WITH PROTEIN BINDING PARTNERS
Human Prune_1 is a naturally unfolded multi-domain adaptor protein. The three-dimensional structure of the carboxylterminus (C-terminus) region of Prune_1 was obtained through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies and molecular dynamics techniques (37). Two globular regions responsible for its enzymatic activities (i.e., DHH and DHHA2 domains) were found within the amino-terminus (N-terminus) domain of Prune_1 (37). The DHHA2 domain also contained a conserved DXK motif at its N-terminus. An intrinsically disordered domain (starting at 371 amino acid residue) containing two stretches with a tendency for helix structures was also identified. The C-terminal domain of Prune_1 is characterized by residues (postulated to reside between 393 and 420) that are involved in its homodimerization and a small globular region responsible for its interactions with other proteins (38,39). In fact, Prune_1 was found with the ability to bind several intracellular protein partners mainly involved in cytoskeletal rearrangement, including aand b-tubulins, glycogen synthase kinase 3b (GSK-3b) (40), and Nm23-H1/H2 (or NDPK-A/B) (6). Through these interactions, Prune_1 can modulate different intracellular pathways that might be then also translated into extracellular signaling, including the canonical Wnt via GSK-3b (8) and TGF-b via Nm23-H1 binding (11).

Prune_1 Interaction With GSK-b
The region of Prune_1 responsible for the interaction with GSK-3b starts from 330 to 394 amino acid residues within the Cterminus domain (8,40). Because of the co-localization between Prune_1 and the focal adhesion proteins (i.e., F-actin, paxillin, and vinculin) in several cell types, this Prune_1-GSK-3b interaction suggests that Prune_1 can also modulate the microtubular architecture and dynamics (40)(41)(42). Importantly, GSK-3b is considered a negative modulator of the canonical WNT/b-catenin pathway through phosphorylation at its amino acid residues S9 and S21 (8,9). Of importance is that, through GSK-3b interaction, Prune_1 was found to activate b-catenin signaling cascade and to further promote Wnt3a secretion in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells (8); thus, a connectome related to the WNT signaling activation was identified (43).
Prune_1 Interaction With NME-1 (Nm23-H1) Prune_1 was also shown to physically interact with the Cterminus domain of Nm23-H1 through its D388 and D422 residues (37). Nm23-H1 is described as the first anti-metastatic gene with different functions: a nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDPK) activity that catalyzes the transfer of a phosphoryl group from a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) to a nucleotide diphosphate (NDP), a histidine kinase function, and a 3′−5′ exonuclease activity (44). In detail, in vitro studies demonstrated that the complex formation involved the dimer of Prune_1 and the hexameric form of Nm23-H1 (38). Interestingly, Nm23-H1 and GSK-3b could bind Prune_1 at the same time by using non-identical regions of its C-terminus domain for their binding, thus suggesting two independent interaction sites for signaling complex assembly (38). Moreover, other in vitro studies demonstrated that the Prune_1/Nm23-H1 interaction complex requires casein kinase I/II-mediated phosphorylation on three serine residues (S120, S122, and S125) of Nm23-H1. Phosphorylated Nm23-H1 on S120, S122, and S125 was also found to increase its hexameric form (41). Of importance the overexpression of both Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 was found in different tumors, such as MB (11), NBL (37) and BC (45). In this regard, the data indicate that the Prune_1/Nm23-H1 complex could affect the anti-metastatic activity of Nm23-H1 and increase the cell motility properties (45,46).

Prune_1 Interaction With aand b-Tubulins
Other potential Prune_1 interactors were identified through a pull-down assay coupled to mass spectrometry analysis in BC cells (42). Through this approach, new potential Prune_1 binders were identified. Among these, the interaction between Prune_1 and b-tubulin was proposed because of the crucial functions played by tubulins, MTs, and MAPs in neural development (47,48). Furthermore, this interaction was also confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation assays (Prune_1 protein and both band a-tubulins) in NBL inducible cell clones (SH-SY5Y) (10). Of significance is that Prune_1 protein was also identified as a MAP by performing a cell-based microtubule-binding protein spindown assay using the same neuronal SH-SY5Y cell clones (10). These data were also confirmed by MT polymerization assays in vitro and "in cells," thus showing an enhancement of the MT polymerization rate (nucleation, growth, and steady-state phases) in the presence of a recombinant wild-type Prune_1 protein (10). Furthermore, Prune_1 was also found to co-localize with MTs (i.e., b-tubulin) in mitotic spindles during cell division (prometaphase, metaphase, anaphase, and cytokinesis) in Hela cells (10). Taken altogether, these data indicate an important role for Prune_1 protein in cellular division processes.

PRUNE_1 IN NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER
The Role of Prune_1 During Neural Development Prune_1 was found to take part in fundamental processes occurring during neural development. In this regard, Prune-M1 and Nm23-M1 (i.e., the murine homologs of human PRUNE_1 and NME-1, respectively) had similar expression patterns in the developing murine nervous system, from early brain development to adulthood (5). In fact, a significant spatiotemporal co-expression of both Prune-M1 and Nm23-M1 during brain development, within the cortex, hippocampus, and midbrain, was observed. Regarding the telencephalon, both genes were found expressed in the ventricular zone (VZ) of the neopallial cortex, a region involved in proliferation processes. Furthermore, the expressions of Prune-M1 and Nm23-M1 were also shown within the intermediate zone and in the ganglionic eminence. These regions allow neurons to migrate to the pial surface of the forebrain to then undergo differentiation processes. Furthermore, Prune-M1 and Nm23-M1 were also expressed in the cerebellum during development in both granular and Purkinje neuron precursors (5). These findings suggest fundamental functions for Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 during cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation processes occurring in the developing brain and mainly in the cerebellum. Of interest is that the expressions of Prune-M1 and Nm23-M1 were also shown during the murine postnatal phases in cortical layers II and IV and in the basal ganglia of the striatum, thus indicating a potential involvement of the complex in somatosensory processing and in synaptic function and plasticity (5). Interestingly, Nme-X1 and Prune-X1 (i.e., Xenopus homolog proteins) were also reported with a potential function in Muller gliogenesis during retinal development in Xenopus (49). This, thus, indicates a role for the Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 complex also during the development of the retina and in eye morphogenesis.

Recessive Mutations in PRUNE_1 Locus Are Responsible for NDD
Recently, homozygous and composite heterozygous mutations in PRUNE_1 locus (1q21.3) were found [through whole-exome sequencing (WES) analyses] in several patients worldwide as causative of the autosomal-recessive NMIHBA (MIM #617481). NMIHBA is a severe disease due to the global developmental delay and the intellectual disability. In fact, most of the affected patients presented MCPH and brain, cerebellar, and optic atrophy. Other cerebral abnormalities were also reported in these patients (through brain imaging), such as cortical atrophy, thickness of the corpus callosum, and hypoplasia of the cerebellum. Some patients were also described with seizure, peripheral spasticity, and slight delay in myelination process. Furthermore, the phenotype is often accompanied by a decreased muscle tone (i.e., "truncal hypotonia"), impossibility to ambulate, or speech and broad dysmorphism.
This complex phenotypic spectrum in NMIHBA patients can be reasoned by the genotypic diversity in PRUNE_1 locus. To date, 64 patients carrying different mutations in the PRUNE_1 gene have been reported worldwide ( Figure 1 and Table 1). Regarding the genotypic differences, among the variants identified in patients with PRUNE_1, the most representative was the homozygous c.G316A (p.D106N) variant that was found in 15 subjects: seven from Turkey (12,16,18), three from Italy (10,14), one from Sri Lanka (19), one from Caucasus (17), and three from Lebanon (16). The majority of homozygous mutations were found within the DHH domain of PRUNE_1, including c.G88A (p.D30N) in six patients from Oman (10) and one from Saudi Arabia (12), c.160C>A (p.P54T) in seven Iranian subjects (10), c.383G>A (p.R128Q) in two patients from Saudi Arabia (15), and c.515T>C (p.L172P) in three children from North Africa (16). Two types of homozygous mutations were also found within the DHHA2 domain: the missense variant c.C889T (p.R297W) in two patients from India (10) (17,20). Furthermore, two different homozygous splicing variants were also described in several patients. In detail, a mutation in the splicing acceptor site (canonical) within intron 4 of PRUNE_1 (c.521-2A>G [IVS4- 2A>G]) was found in an Oji-Cree male (13) and in nine patients belonging to four Manitoba-Cree families (51). A different mutation in the splice donor site within intron 2 of the PRUNE_1 gene (i.e., c.132+2T>C) was also described in five patients from two consanguineous Sudanese families (50). Moreover, homozygous deletion (g.1509-84457-151016-662del) starting from exon 2 to exon 8 including the 3′UTR was also found in two female children from Austria (16). Similarly, a homozygous truncating c.50dup (p.Leu18Serfs*8) variant was found in a Japanese child (17). Recently, a start loss c.3G>A (p.Met1)? variant in the PRUNE_1 gene was also reported in two Iranian patients (53).
A genotype/phenotype correlation study was performed to dissect the function of mutant Prune_1 proteins focusing on the cG88A (p.D30N) and c.C889T (p.R297W) variants (10). Of interest is that the recombinant p.D30N and p.R297W mutant proteins (as synthetized and purified in Escherichia coli) were shown to have an increased PPX/PPase activity in vitro on tetraphosphates (P4) as substrates in comparison to the wild-type protein (K cat /K m values: wild-type, 0.014 mM/s; p.D30N, 0.312 mM/s; p.R297W, 0.064 mM/s), thus suggesting a "gain-of-function" activity. The same mutant Prune_1 proteins (i.e., p.D30N and p.R297W) were also shown to affect both the cell proliferation and migration rates in NBL inducible cell clones (SH-SY5Y) (10). Furthermore, the MT polymerization kinetics was found delayed in the presence of the same mutant Prune_1 proteins both in vitro and in cells (10). Altogether, these in vitro results suggest that the cG88A (p.D30N) and c.C889T (p.R297W) variants in the PRUNE_1 gene are gain-of-function mutations responsible for the alteration of cell proliferation and migration via impairment of MT polymerization using a neuronal model (i.e., SH-SY5Y cells). These results are in agreement with the homodimeric form of Prune_1 as reported in vitro (38) and confirmed in cells (41).
In contrast, another study reported that the missense c.G316A (p.D106N) and c.G383A (p.R128Q) variants result in a complete loss of PPX/PPase enzymatic activity on both P3 and P4 as substrates with respect to the wild-type Prune_1 protein, thus suggesting a loss-of-function activity for these mutants (54). Additionally, in the same paper, the authors showed an increased proteasome-dependent intracellular degradation of mutant p.D30N and p.D106N Prune_1 proteins using unsynchronized human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells. In contrast, cells expressing the mutant p.G174 * protein showed absence of Prune_1, while those expressing mutant p.R128Q resulted in an amount of Prune_1 protein comparable to that expressed by wild-type HEK-293 cells (54). Furthermore, homozygous null alleles in Prune_1 knockout mice were embryonic lethal at E9.5 with several vascular anomalies, including those in the yolk sac and in the cephalic vascular system (54). Thus, in contrast to the previous study, these data suggest a reduced function of mutant Prune_1 proteins due to hypomorphic variant alleles. Future research studies should be focused on this topic to functionally dissect these "gain or loss" single amino acid changes in PRUNE_1 locus using in vivo state-of-the-art mouse development technology and/or functional analyses in fibroblast-derived organoids from affected patients.

MEDULLOBLASTOMA
MB is an embryonal tumor occurring in the cerebellum and represents ∼20% of all primary childhood CNS tumors. Recent integrative genomics, messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, and methylation profiling have allowed MB to be stratified into different molecular subgroups: Wingless (WNT), Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), group 3, and group 4 (60). Heterogeneity within these subgroups has been recognized, and it has been suggested that MB may consist of up 12 subtypes [i.e., WNT (a and b), SHH (a, b, g, and d), group 3 (a, b, and g), and group 4 (a, b, and g)] (60). Distinctive transcriptional, mutational, and epigenetic profiles were reported for each MB subtype, with different clinical features (60). The MB SHH subgroup is characterized by an aberrant activation of the SHH pathway and arises from cerebellar granule neuron progenitors (GNPs) mainly mutated in PTCH1 or SMO receptors, although a noncanonical SHH/GLI activation has also been frequently observed (60). Although ∼60% of MB belongs to groups 3 and 4, future studies are needed to clarify the developmental origins and the biological mechanisms of these latest subgroups (60). MB group 3 is considered the most aggressive subgroup because of the high metastatic potential and the poor survival rate. The amplification of c-MYC is a common genetic feature in MB group 3 patients that was found to be inversely correlated with the clinical outcomes (63). One-third of MB group 4 patients are diagnosed with metastasis and show recurrent alterations in the genes involved in chromatin modification (64). Furthermore, amplifications of the MYCN and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) genes are alterations more commonly found in MB group 4 (65). In contrast, isochromosome 17q is found in more than 50% of both MB group 3 and 4 patients, thus being considered a common cytogenetic hallmark for these two subgroups. Of interest is that bulk high-throughput genomic profiling studies have recently reported a strong heterogeneity in MB groups 3 and 4 in terms of molecular and clinical features, thus showing a subset of tumors with overlapping signatures (66). The impact of this heterogeneity on therapy has been limited to trials testing Smoothened (SMO) antagonists for patients with MB SHH (67) and efforts to reduce therapy for those children affected by the MB WNT subgroup (68), who have relatively good outcomes. Outside of these trials, tailored therapies for MB groups 3 and 4 are currently lacking, and the combination of surgery, craniospinal radiotherapy (except in young children for whom radiotherapy has devastating neurocognitive side effects), and multi-agent chemotherapy is used (69).
Recently, high expressions of Prune_1 were found in these metastatic MB subgroups (i.e., MB groups 3 and 4), and a new metastatic axis (independent of c-MYC amplification) was dissected in MB group 3 with the poorest prognosis. In this regard, Prune_1 protein, due to the binding to Nm23-H1, enhances the canonical TGF-b pathway, thus leading to OTX2 and SNAIL upregulation, PTEN reduction, and EMT activation (11). Furthermore, gene expression and gene ontology analyses allowed other genes (i.e., OTX2, CYFIP1, and GLI2) involved in neurogenesis to be correlated to Prune_1 (11). Interestingly, a cell competitive permeable peptide (cell-penetrating peptide, CPP) that impairs Prune_1/Nn23-H1 complex formation was found to impair both tumorigenesis and metastatic spread in orthotopic models implanted with metastatic MB group 3 cells overexpressing c-MYC and mutated for TP53 (i.e., D425-Med cells), thus representing the most aggressive type of MB with the poorest prognosis (70). Furthermore, an anti-Prune_1 molecule (pyrimido-pyrimidine derivative, i.e., AA7.1) (23) was also found with the ability to bind Prune_1 protein, to enhance its intracellular degradation and to increase the PTEN protein level, thus inhibiting the Prune_1-mediated metastatic network both in vitro in primary human medullospheres obtained from patients and also in vivo in orthotopic xenograft models of metastatic MB group 3 (11).

Gastric Cancer
Prune_1 was found overexpressed in one-third of a cohort of human GC as measured via quantitative PCR (qPCR) and immunohistochemical analyses (55). Prune_1 was positively correlated with advanced tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis. In this regard, GC patients expressing Prune_1 showed worse survival rates compared to those in which Prune_1 was not detected. Furthermore, the majority of these GC specimens (87%) were also found with positivity for the Nm23-H1 protein. Interestingly, the presence of Nm23-H1 was detected in all Prune_1-positive GC samples. Altogether, these findings indicate that the overexpression of both Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 is associated with poor clinical outcomes in GC (55).

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Prune_1 was also found increased in 21% of a cohort (n = 205) of ESCC patients. Its protein levels were found to be positively correlated with the tumor size (T; p < 0.0001) and regional lymph nodes (N; p < 0.0001). These data show that PRUNE_1 could be used to identify ESCC patients with increased risk of disease recurrence or poor clinical outcomes (56).

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Prune_1 was shown to modulate the Wnt pathway in NSCLC via its binding to GSK-3b and, as a consequence, the activation of b-catenin cascade (8). In this regard, Prune_1 silencing (through adenoviral approach) resulted in the reduction of activated b-catenin, inhibition of cell invasion, and decrease of the proliferation rate in NSCLC cells (8). Furthermore, the silencing of Prune_1 was also reported to inhibit lung metastasis formation in vivo using a murine xenograft model injected (via tail vein) with A549-Luc cells (overexpressing the firefly luciferase gene) silenced for Prune_1. Tumorigenesis was followed using in vivo bioluminescence (BLI) technology (71). Mice receiving these cells silenced for Prune_1 showed significant reduction of the tumor burden and lung metastasis nodules compared to those in the control group (8). Furthermore, Prune_1 protein was also detected in the serum of NSCLC patients via ELISA (8), thus suggesting that it could represent an early diagnostic marker for this type of tumors.

Thyroid Cancer
The role of Prune_1 in TC was also studied (57). In this regard, Prune_1 was detected in anaplastic TC and metastatic lymph node specimens. Prune_1 silencing and the inhibition of its PDE activity via dipyridamole were found to inhibit cell motility in human TC cells (i.e., 8505C and KTC-3) (57). These data were also confirmed in vivo, in which the inhibition of Prune_1 was reported to suppress tumor invasion and pulmonary metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of TC (57). Thus, these analyses altogether confirm Prune_1 as a candidate target in anaplastic TC.

Colorectal Cancer
Prune_1 expression was found to be correlated with cell motility and EMT in CRC liver metastases (CRLM) (58). Prune_1 was found to positively regulate migration and EMT processes through in vitro assays performed using cells overexpressing or silenced for Prune_1 (58). Furthermore, in vivo experiments (with murine xenograft models) also confirmed the association of Prune_1 with tumor invasion and distant metastases (58). Interestingly, immunohistochemical analyses detected the Prune_1 protein in 28% of a cohort of CRC patients. Importantly, these Prune_1-positive CRC tumors showed significant lower overall survival (OS) rates (p = 0.003) (58).

Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Prune_1 was found overexpressed in HCC in a cohort of 304 patients using tissue microarray (TMA) (72). Of importance is that the expression of Prune_1 was found to be correlated with poorer OS and disease-free survival (DFS). Furthermore, gene expression analyses performed in HCC patients overexpressing Prune_1 demonstrated a statistically significant enrichment of the genes with roles in proliferative processes, DNA methylation, and the canonical Wnt pathway (72). Moreover, mutational spectra in HCC tumors with higher Prune_1 protein levels showed higher mutation burdens in RPS6KA3 and RB1 genes (72). Altogether, these findings suggest that PRUNE_1 acts as a tumor promoter gene in HCC. Furthermore, at this time, its role in the epigenetic changes occurring in cancer-related genes can be postulated.

Breast Cancer and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
High expression levels of Prune_1 were found associated with metastasis in regional lymph nodes (p = 0.017) and in distant sites (p = 0.029) in a cohort of BC-affected patients (45). These results were also recently confirmed in patients with TNBC through TMA immunohistochemistry technologies (59). In detail, the levels of Prune_1 protein had a positive correlation with distant metastasis (lung) and infiltrating pro-tumorigenic tumor-associated macrophages (M2-TAMs) with antiinflammatory functions in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of metastatic TNBC characterized by the overexpression of both human Prune_1 and Wnt1 in breast [through the use of the mouse mammary tumour virus (MMTV) promoter, i.e., MMTV-Prune_1/Wnt1] revealed that Prune_1 enhances the polarization of TAMs toward the M2 phenotype in the TME via the activation of the canonical (SMAD2-mediated) TGF-b pathway, IL17F secretion, and extracellular vesicle protein content modulation (59). Worth noting is that the non-toxic small anti-Prune_1 molecule (i.e., AA7.1) was found with the ability to impair the extracellular crosstalk between TNBC cells characterized by Prune_1 overexpression and TAMs, thus reducing the metastatic properties of the tumorigenic cells in vivo by using a GEMM of metastatic TNBC (i.e., MMTV-Prune_1/Wnt1) (59).

Neuroblastoma
Prune_1 and its interactor Nm23-H1 were also found significantly overexpressed in NBL (37). Interestingly, a positive correlation trend between Nm23-H1, Prune_1, and patients' survival rates was also reported (37). Taken altogether, these findings suggest that the formation of the Prune_1/Nm23-H1 complex may have a role in cancer progression in NBL. Furthermore, high levels of Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 increased the aggressiveness of NBL cells (SH-SY5Y and SK-N-BE) in vitro and in vivo (37). In this regard, Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 were found to enhance the formation of metastatic foci in a mouse orthotopic xenograft model of NBL (37). Importantly, a cell CPP mimicking the region of Nm23-H1 that is responsible for its interaction with Prune_1 was found with the ability to impair the cell motility in vitro and the tumor growth and metastasis formation in vivo (37). Thus, the Prune_1/Nm23-H1 complex was found to enhance NBL tumorigenesis, and its impairment using CPP may be a useful strategy for NBL treatment.

Targeting Prune_1/Nm23-H1 Complex
Due to their prominent role in metastatic tumors, targeting the Prune_1/Nm23-H1 protein complex represents a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment. The protein complex formation between Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 i s d e p en d e n t o n c a s e i n k i na s e 1 ( C KI ) -m e d i a t e d phosphorylation in S120, S122, and S125 on the C-terminus domain of Nm23-H1 protein (41). Thus, therapeutic strategies aimed to inhibit Prune_1/Nm23-H1 complex formation via targeting these phosphorylation processes could be applied in tumorigenic cells. In this regard, a CPP was developed to mimic the region of Nm23-H1 (from amino acids 115 to 129) that contains these residues (i.e., S120, S122, and S125) that are phosphorylated by the CKI enzyme. The ability of CPP to impair the Prune_1/Nm23-H1 complex was assayed in different tumorigenic cells in vitro (Table 2) (73). As a consequence, CPP reduced the cell proliferation and cell motility in vitro in BC, prostate cancer (PC), CRC, NBL, and MB cells (11,73). The delivery of CPP in these tumorigenic cells was performed through adenoviral particles carrying the sequences encoding for CPP and for the transactivating protein of HIV. The absence of cytotoxicity in vitro in nontumorigenic cells (i.e., HEK-293) indicated a specific action of CPP against cancer cells. The same adenoviral approach was also used in vivo (using xenograft murine models) to show the therapeutic benefits of CPP against PC, NBL, and MB ( Table 2) (11,37,73). Of importance is that the biosafety of CPP in mice was also reported in terms of hematological parameters. Altogether, these data address the potential future use of CPP for the treatment of PC, NBL, and MB.

Targeting Prune_1 Enzymatic Activities
The impairment of the PDE or PPX/PPase activities of Prune_1 represents another promising anti-tumorigenic strategy to impair tumor progression. In this regard, the PDE activity of Prune_1 was found to stimulate cellular motility in vitro and, as a consequence, metastatic progression. Furthermore, the antitumorigenic action of dipyridamole (an anti-platelet aggregation agent and one of the selective PDE inhibitors) in TNBC was also investigated in vivo using xenograft mice ( Table 2) (22). Thus, PDE inhibitors could be used as therapeutic agents for Prune_1-overexpressing tumors. Interestingly, dipyridamole did not affect the PPX/PPase enzymatic function of Prune_1, as measured using P3 as a substrate (7).
The PPX/PPAse activity was shown to be diminished by Nm23-H1 in vitro (7). Indeed, Nm23-H1 was able to inhibit the P3-hydrolyzing activity of Prune_1 at micromolar concentrations (7). These data suggest a potential binding competition between Nm23-H1 and the P3 substrate for Prune_1. Thus, small-molecule activators of Nm23-H1 (e.g., NMac1) (74) represent future strategies to impair cancer progression in tumors characterized by the overexpression of Prune_1 and Nm23-H1.
It is of interest that long-chain polyPs (poor substrates of Prune_1) were also found to reduce the Prune_1-catalyzed hydrolysis of P3 substrate (7). This inhibitory effect may be due to Mg 2+ chelation or to the competition between P3 and long-chain polyPs for active site binding of Prune_1. To date, other studies have reported on the anti-tumorigenic actions of polyPs. In this regard, the anti-metastatic activity of polyPs (P75) was reported for melanoma in vivo using murine xenograft models (75). Furthermore, treatment with polyPs (P120) was found to reduce the intracellular ATP level in NSCLC and increased their sensitivity to X-irradiation (76). Thus, polyPs can be promising targets for the development of novel antitumorigenic therapies in humans.

Targeting Prune_1 as Downregulating Its Protein Levels
To date, a pyrimido-pyrimidine derivative (AA7.1) was found with the ability to decrease Prune_1 protein intracellular levels may be via enhancement of its proteasomal-dependent degradation (11). Protein-drug interaction studies (via NMR approaches) showed the amino acid residues of Prune_1 that are mainly responsible for the binding to AA7.1 (i.e., L359 and D364) (11). This molecule was also found able to decrease Prune_1 mRNA and protein levels in different MB group 3 (11) and TNBC (59) cells ( Table 2). In vitro and in vivo assays also showed the ability of AA7.1 to decrease the cell proliferative   and migratory processes ( Table 2). In detail, in MB group 3, AA7.1 impaired the metastatic axis driven by Prune_1, thus leading to impairment in TGF-b, decreased levels of OTX2, upregulation of PTEN, inhibition of EMT, reduction in Nestin, and increases in Tuj1 and GFAP differentiation neuronal markers (11). These results suggest the potential of AA7.1 to inhibit the neural stem/progenitor cell markers and to increase neuronal differentiation processes, thus inhibiting the role of Prune_1 in these very important biological processes during neurogenesis. Furthermore, the pharmacological inhibition of Prune_1 protein in TNBC (achieved through AA7.1 treatment) decreased the number of metastatic foci in vivo also via inhibiting the switch of TAMs in the TME toward the M2 phenotype (59). In TNBC, AA7.1-mediated tumor inhibition occurred through the impairment of the TGF-b pathway, reduction of inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-17F) and the modulation of the protein content of extracellular vesicles (i.e., vimentin) (59). Importantly, this small molecule is not toxic, as suggested by the lack of acute toxicity measured in naive mice (Balb/C) that were intraperitoneally administered escalating doses (15,30, and 60 mg/kg) of AA7.1 daily for 1 week (11). The results showed no immediate acute toxicity of AA7.1 (in terms of hematological parameters, hepatotoxicity, or nephrotoxicity) in treated mice, as measured via glutamate-pyruvate transaminase 1, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, creatinine blood levels, and blood urea nitrogen (11). Thus, altogether, these findings suggest that AA7.1 is a nontoxic potential immunomodulatory molecule with the ability to modulate the inflammatory processes in the TME, thus inhibiting the metastatic spread in Prune_1-overexpressing tumors.
To date, none of these therapeutic approaches (as summarized in Table 2) has entered clinical testing. However, the pharmacological approach via Prune_1 downregulation (though AA7.1 treatment) has shown therapeutic benefits in murine models of MB and TNBC with the absence of acute toxicity (11). Regarding the inhibition of Prune_1/Nm23-H1 complex formation, CPP was also tested in vivo in xenograft mice of NBL and prostate cancer, thus also representing a promising strategy against tumors overexpressing both Prune_1 and Nm23-H1. Therefore, future studies should be focused on developing i) small molecules (e.g., AA7.1 derivatives) with a higher affinity to Prune_1 in order to reduce the dose to be used in vivo and ii) synthetic peptides with the ability to impair the interaction between Prune_1 and Nm23-H1, hence overcoming the use of adenoviral infection that might suffer from tissuespecific trophism.

DISCUSSION
Neural development involves a dynamic orchestrated sequence of cellular events driven by proliferation and migration processes involving neural progenitor cells (77). A tight spatial/temporal regulation of the proliferation and migration events in neural progenitor cells (NPCs) may prevent developmental malformations (as a result of hypo-proliferation) and tumor formation (due to hyper-proliferation). In this regard, NDDs (e.g., MCPH) may be caused by genetic mutations affecting the genes that modulate the proliferation and migration properties of NPCs. Similarly, brain tumorigenic cells can also derive from NPCs. Thus, the proliferation rate of brain tumorigenic cells may be regulated by the same genes that exert control on normal proliferative cells (78). Indeed, the different MB subgroups can originate from neural stem cells residing in the VZ of the cerebellum or from NPCs localized in the external granular layer of the cerebellum or rhombic lip (79). Since MB cells have been found to retain the genetic and molecular features of the cell of origin (80), the proteins involved in the growth and survival processes of neural stem cells or NPCs may also exert the same functions in brain tumorigenic cells.
Among these proteins, the PRUNE_1 gene was reported both mutated in NDDs (i.e., NMIHBA) and overexpressed in pediatric brain tumors (i.e., MB). In this regard, Prune_1 was found with a fundamental role in the proliferation and migration processes occurring during neural development. Its expression, together with Nm23-H1, was detected in the mouse developing brain in the cortex, hippocampus, midbrain, and in the VZ, in which proliferation processes take place (5). Furthermore, mutations in the different regions of the human PRUNE_1 gene (mainly in the region encoding for the DHH domain) were found to be causative of NDDs characterized by MCPH (the majority of the patients) and other brain anomalies (i.e., NMIHBA). At the same time, the Prune_1 protein was also described as overexpressed in both CNS and PNS tumors, including pediatric MB group 3, which drives the metastatic spread (11).
Thus, the deregulation of Prune_1 in somatic or germinal cells may result in oncogenesis or neural developmental defects, respectively. The explanation for this dual phenotypic effect might be provided by the pleiotropic role of Prune_1 in modulating several cellular processes, including proliferation, migration, MT polymerization during mitosis, and the regulation of signaling pathways.
We think that all these different functions are modulated by the enzymatic activities of Prune_1 (i.e., PPX/PPase and phosphodiesterase) and its property of being a naturally unfolded protein able to interact with other proteins with a role in these processes (i.e., Nm-23-H1/H2 and GSK-3b) ( Figure 1C). How these interactions influence these processes is still to be discovered in detail in the near future. All these different functions are regulated by the enzymatic activities of Prune_1 (i.e., PPX/PPase and phosphodiesterase) and its unfolded structure in the C-terminus domain that allows it to interact with different proteins (i.e., Nm-23-H1/H2 and GSK-3b) ( Figure 1C).
Of interest is that, through in silico analyses of 5,000 bp upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) of the PRUNE_1 gene, a number of sequences predicted to act as binding sites for transcriptional regulators have been identified (see Figures 2A-D and Table 3). This genomic region also contains sites (highly conserved through evolution) targeted by epigenetic modifications. Furthermore, the presence of a CpG island was also found (Figure 2A), thus suggesting potential DNA methylation sites associated with transcriptional repression. Overall, these predicted sites could be of importance for potential negative/positive modulation of PRUNE_1 expression. Of note is that, among these putative transcriptional factors present at the 5′ region of the PRUNE_1 gene (Table 3), we found mutations in SMARCA4 that are available in a significant frequency of MB and pancreatic cancers and in many other tumor subtypes (81)(82)(83). SMARCA4 was reported as the most frequently mutated gene in MB group 3 (83). Future research issues will be aimed at defining this finding and the transcriptional regulation of the PRUNE_1 gene program in neurogenesis, development, epidermal differentiation, and cell cycle regulation. However, the roles and the transcriptional mechanisms of Prune_1 in both oncogenesis and NDDs still need further future investigations.
The mechanisms responsible for correct mitosis are of importance for both normal brain development and primary brain tumor growth (i.e., MB). Besides PRUNE_1, the other five genes (i.e., KIF11, KIF14, ASPM, CDK6, and ATR) have been reported as mutated in hereditary MCPH and overexpressed in primary brain tumors (e.g., MB). The products encoded by these genes are known to play crucial roles in regulating mitotic entry or cell cycle progression (78). Here, we analyzed public gene expression data related to the genes reported as causative of primary MCPH (47,48) (Table 4) and PRUNE_1 by interrogating available MB datasets (i.e., Pfister, Delattre, Gilbertson, and Kool) through the R2 Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform (http://r2.amc.nl) (Figure 3). Interestingly, these data showed that the expression levels of the majority of these genes (i.e., 77.8%) were higher in MB samples compared to those in normal cerebellum (Figure 3). On these genes mutated in MCPH and overexpressed in MB, further analyses were performed using KEGG in order to identify a potential network of proteins ( Figure 4). The data showed that these proteins are mainly involved in biological processes such as cell cycle (red, GO:0007049), mitotic cell cycle (blue, GO:1903047), MT-based process (green, GO:0007017), and CNS development (yellow, GO:0007417). Future studies will be needed to study the transcriptional activation of these genes and their functions on proliferation and migration in brain tumors.
Intriguingly, Prune_1 was reported to activate the canonical Wnt pathway through its binding to GSK-3b. However, its overexpression in MB was found in metastatic groups 3 and 4, but not in tumors belonging to the Wnt molecular subgroup. This may be due to the different frequencies of genetic aberration (e.g., amplification of chromosome 1q) in the different subtypes of MB (60) and also because of the heterogeneity among the MB subtypes and their distinct developmental origins. In this regard, the cerebellum is thought to be the origin site for MB SHH, group 3, and group 4, while the lower rhombic lip of the developing brain stem seems to represent the site from which MB WNT arises (79). More in detail, the cells of origin for MB SHH are the granule cell precursors (GCPs) (79). In contrast, MB group 3 develops from Nestin + cerebellar stem cells, and MB group 4 derives from progenitor cells giving rise to both GCP and unipolar brush cell (UBC) lineages (79).
To date, among the mutations identified in PRUNE_1 locus in NMIHBA patients, only three gene variants have been reported within the public data of Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC, v94, released May 29, 2021) of 39,615 samples collected. In detail, the missense p.D30N Prune_1 variant (COSM5843581) was found in one patient affected with malignant melanoma, the p.R297W mutation (COSM462922) was reported in one subject suffering from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and in three patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma, and the splicing c.521-2A>G variant (COSM7836151) was found in one patient with squamous cell lung carcinoma. Nevertheless, because of the paucity of tumor samples with PRUNE_1 mutations and due to the lack of information regarding the zygosity of the identified variants, we cannot hypothesize a role for these PRUNE_1 mutations in tumorigenic processes. Thus, further studies will be needed to address this issue. Different genotype to phenotype correlation studies have been reported to dissect the role of mutant Prune_1 protein in children affected with NMIHBA. In this regard, opposing enzymatic activities for mutated Prune_1 proteins have been reported (10,54). The contrasting results about the biochemical activity of the mutant Prune_1 proteins could be reasoned by the homodimeric form reported for Prune_1 (38), the interaction with intracellular binding partners (whose protein abundance is dependent of the cell district) that can modulate its enzymatic function (e.g., Nm23-H1) (7), and the possible oscillatory changes in Prune_1 protein abundance (and activity) during the cell cycle because of its role in the mitotic spindle during mitosis (10). Thus, further studies taking into account the potential role of polyPs at short chain lengths (as Prune_1 substrates) in neurogenesis and the homodimeric structure of Prune_1 and its interactors will be needed to address this issue.
Of interest is that Prune_1 acts as a MAP, enhances the MT polymerization (in vitro and in cells), and co-localizes with btubulin in the mitotic spindle in dividing cells (10). Importantly, its interactor, Nm23-H1, was also described to be an active constituent of the centrosomes (84) and was reported to be associated with aand b-tubulins with a role in their

Gene name
Gene ontology

MCPH1
Microcephalin. Implicated in chromosome condensation and DNA damage-induced cellular responses. May play a role in neurogenesis and regulation of the size of the cerebral cortex. CDK5RAP2 CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2. Potential regulator of CDK5 activity via its interaction with CDK5R1. Negative regulator of centriole disengagement (licensing), which maintains centriole engagement and cohesion. Involved in the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation. Plays a role in spindle checkpoint activation by acting as a transcriptional regulator of both BUBR1 and MAD2 promoters. Together with MAPRE1, it may promote microtubule polymerization, bundle formation, growth, and dynamics at the plus ends. Regulates centrosomal maturation.

CEP152
Centrosomal protein of 152 kDa. Necessary for centrosome duplication; the function seems to also involve CEP63, CDK5RAP2, and WDR62 through a stepwise assembled complex at the centrosome that recruits CDK2 required for centriole duplication. Acts as a molecular scaffold facilitating the interaction of PLK4 and CENPJ, two molecules involved in centriole formation. Proposed to snatch PLK4 away from PLK4:CEP92 complexes in early G1 daughter centriole and to reposition PLK4 at the outer boundary of a newly forming CEP152 ring structure. Also plays a key role in deuterosome-mediated centriole.

ASPM
Abnormal spindle-like microcephaly-associated protein. Involved in mitotic spindle regulation and coordination of mitotic processes. Its function in regulating microtubule dynamics at spindle poles, including spindle orientation, astral microtubule density, and poleward microtubule flux, seems to depend on the association with the katanin complex formed by KATNA1 and KATNB1. Enhances the microtubule lattice severing activity of KATNA1 by recruiting the katanin complex to microtubules. Can block microtubule minus-end growth; reversely, this function can be enhanced by the katanin complex. Centrosomal protein of 135 kDa. Centrosomal protein involved in centriole biogenesis. Acts as a scaffolding protein during early centriole biogenesis. Required for the targeting of centriole satellite proteins to centrosomes such as of PCM1, SSX2IP, and CEP290 and the recruitment of WRAP73 to centrioles. Also required for centriole-centriole cohesion during interphase by acting as a platform protein for CEP250 at the centriole. Belongs to the CEP135/TSGA10 family. CASC5 Kinetochore scaffold 1. Performs two crucial functions during mitosis: it is essential for spindle assembly checkpoint signaling and for correct chromosome alignment. Required for the attachment of the kinetochores to the spindle microtubules. Directly links BUB1 and BUB1B to kinetochores. Part of the MIS12 complex, which may be fundamental for kinetochore formation and proper chromosome segregation during mitosis. Acts in coordination with CENPK to recruit the NDC80 complex to the outer kinetochore.

PHC1
Polyhomeotic-like protein 1. Component of a Polycomb group (PcG) multiprotein PRC1-like complex, a complex class required to maintain the transcriptionally repressive state of many genes, including Hox genes, throughout development. PcG PRC1 complex acts via chromatin remodeling and modification of histones. It mediates the monoubiquitination of histone H2A "Lys-119," rendering chromatin heritably changed in its expressibility. Required for proper control of cellular levels of GMNN expression.

CDK6
Cyclin-dependent kinase 6. Serine/threonine protein kinase involved in the control of cell cycle and differentiation. Promotes G1/S transition. Phosphorylates pRB/RB1 and NPM1. Interacts with D-type G1 cyclins during interphase at G1 to form a pRB/RB1 kinase and controls the entrance into the cell cycle. Involved in the initiation and maintenance of cell cycle exit during cell differentiation. Prevents cell proliferation and negatively regulates cell differentiation, but is required for the proliferation of specific cell types (e.g., erythroid and hematopoietic cells).

CENPE
Centromere-associated protein E. Microtubule plus-end-directed kinetochore motor that plays an important role in chromosome congression, microtubulekinetochore conjugation, and spindle assembly checkpoint activation. Drives chromosome congression (alignment of chromosomes at the spindle equator resulting in the formation of the metaphase plate) by mediating the lateral sliding of polar chromosomes along spindle microtubules toward the spindle equator and by aiding the establishment and maintenance of connections between kinetochores and spindle microtubules.

ANKLE2
Ankyrin repeat and LEM domain-containing protein 2. Involved in mitotic nuclear envelope reassembly by promoting the dephosphorylation of BAF/BANF1 during mitotic exit. Coordinates the control of BAF/BANF1 dephosphorylation by inhibiting VRK1 kinase and promoting the dephosphorylation of BAF/ BANF1 by protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), thereby facilitating nuclear envelope assembly. It is unclear whether it acts as a real PP2A regulatory subunit or whether it is involved in the recruitment of the PP2A complex. Involved in brain development.

COPB2
Coatomer subunit beta. The coatomer is a cytosolic protein complex that binds to dilysine motifs and reversibly associates with Golgi non-clathrin-coated vesicles, which further mediate biosynthetic protein transport from the ER via the Golgi up to the trans-Golgi network. The coatomer complex is required for budding from Golgi membranes and is essential for the retrograde Golgi-to-ER transport of dilysine-tagged proteins. In mammals, the coatomer can only be recruited by membranes associated with ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs), which are small GTP-binding proteins.

KIF14
Kinesin-like protein KIF14. Microtubule motor protein that binds to microtubules with high affinity through each tubulin heterodimer and has an ATPase activity. Plays a role in many processes such as cell division, cytokinesis, and also in cell proliferation and apoptosis. During cytokinesis, targets to the central spindle and midbody through its interaction with PRC1 and CIT, respectively. Regulates cell growth through the regulation of cell cycle progression and cytokinesis. During cell cycle progression, acts through SCF-dependent proteasomal ubiquitin-dependent protein.

NCAPD2
Condensin complex subunit 1. Regulatory subunit of the condensin complex, a complex required for the conversion of interphase chromatin into mitoticlike condense chromosomes. The condensin complex probably introduces positive supercoils into relaxed DNA in the presence of type I topoisomerases and converts nicked DNA into positive knotted forms in the presence of type II topoisomerases. May target the condensin complex to DNA via its Cterminal domain. Belongs to the CND1 (condensin subunit 1) family.

NCAPD3
Condensin-2 complex subunit D3. Regulatory subunit of the condensin-2 complex, a complex that establishes mitotic chromosome architecture and is involved in the physical rigidity of the chromatid axis.
(Continued) Nucleoporin Nup37. Component of the Nup107-160 subcomplex of the nuclear pore complex (NPC). The Nup107-160 subcomplex is required for the assembly of a functional NPC. The Nup107-160 subcomplex is also required for normal kinetochore microtubule attachment, mitotic progression, and chromosome segregation. LMNB1 Lamin-B1. Lamins are components of the nuclear lamina, a fibrous layer on the nucleoplasmic side of the inner nuclear membrane, which is thought to provide a framework for the nuclear envelope and may also interact with chromatin. LMNB2 Lamin-B2. Lamins are components of the nuclear lamina, a fibrous layer on the nucleoplasmic side of the inner nuclear membrane, which is thought to provide a framework for the nuclear envelope and may also interact with chromatin. Belongs to the intermediate filament family.

WDR62
WD repeat-containing protein 62. Required for cerebral cortical development. Plays a role in neuronal proliferation and migration. Plays a role in mothercentriole-dependent centriole duplication. The function seems to also involve CEP152, CDK5RAP2, and CEP63 through a stepwise assembled complex at the centrosome that recruits CDK2 required for centriole duplication.

MFSD2A
Sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine symporter 1. Sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) symporter, which plays an essential role for blood-brain barrier formation and function. Specifically expressed in the endothelium of the blood-brain barrier of microvessels and transports LPC into the brain. Transport of LPC is essential because it constitutes the major mechanism by which docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid that is essential for normal brain growth and cognitive function, enters the brain.

SASS6
Spindle assembly abnormal protein 6 homolog. Central scaffolding component of the centrioles ensuring their ninefold symmetry. Required for centrosome biogenesis and duplication: required both for mother-centriole-dependent centriole duplication and deuterosome-dependent centriole amplification in multiciliated cells. Overexpression results in excess foci-bearing centriolar markers. Required for the recruitment of STIL to the procentriole and for STILmediated centriole amplification.

WDFY3
WD repeat and FYVE domain-containing protein 3. Required for selective macroautophagy (aggrephagy). Acts as an adapter protein by linking specific proteins destined for degradation to the core autophagic machinery members, such as the ATG5-ATG12-ATG16L E3-like ligase, SQSTM1, and LC3. Along with p62/SQSTM1, involved in the formation and autophagic degradation of cytoplasmic ubiquitin-containing inclusions (p62 bodies, ALIS/ aggresome-like induced structures). Along with SQSTM1, required to recruit ubiquitinated proteins to PML bodies in the nucleus. Important for normal brain development.

ZNF335
Zinc finger protein 335. Component or associated component of some histone methyltransferase complexes that may regulate transcription through the recruitment of these complexes on gene promoters. Enhances ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by nuclear hormone receptors. Plays an important role in neural progenitor cell proliferation and self-renewal through the regulation of specific genes involved in brain development, including REST. Also controls the expressions of genes involved in somatic development and regulates, for instance, lymphoblast proliferation.

C7ORF43
Chromosome 7 open reading frame 43, with unknown function. polymerization (85,86), probably acting as a source of GTP necessary for aand b-tubulins during their assembly. Altogether, these data suggest a potential role for the Prune_1 and Nm23-H1 complex during MT polymerization processes. At this time, we can postulate that the Prune_1 protein may be implicated in both NDD and brain tumor development mostly due to its enzymatic activities and its ability to activate signaling cascades ( Figure 5). Prune_1, by acting as a MAP, enhances MT polymerization, thus modulating the dynamics of MTs in the mitotic spindle during mitosis. Thus, in NMIHBA patients, mutated Prune_1 proteins were found to be responsible for the delayed MT polymerization and the decreased cell proliferation and migration processes ( Figure 5, upper panel). On the other hand, in tumorigenic cells, the Prune_1 protein was found to activate canonical Wnt (via its binding to GSK-3b), thus promoting the activation of bcatenin and the secretion of Wnt3a. Prune_1 was also reported to enhance the TGF-b pathway (through interaction with Nm23-H1), increase OTX2 and N-cadherin levels, and reduce PTEN levels. Moreover, Prune_1 was reported to modulate the secretion of soluble cytokines (including IL-17F) and the vesicle protein content (e.g., vimentin). These mechanisms of action lead to the increase of the cell proliferation rate of tumorigenic cells and their metastatic spread ( Figure 5, bottom panel).
In conclusion, Prune_1 is emerging as a novel attractive target in both NDD and brain tumorigenesis. To date, several approaches (e.g., pharmacological inhibition or cell competitive permeable peptides) to impair Prune_1 protein, its enzymatic activities, or its interaction with other protein binding partners have been tested in vitro and/or in vivo in preclinical animal models ( Table 2). Furthermore, the development of new small molecules able to rescue the altered enzymatic activity of mutated Prune_1 proteins could also be useful for the treatment of tumors in which the same mutations in PRUNE_1 locus were found.
Despite the promising results here presented related to the use of novel modalities of Prune_1 inhibitors, these small molecules have not been tested yet in clinical settings. We envision, at this time, that aggressive and metastatic tumors will greatly benefit from these inhibitors in new clinical programs.  Similarly, Nm23-H1 was also shown to take part in polymerization processes. When Prune_1 is mutated (e.g., p.D30N and p.R297W), MT polymerization is delayed, thus unbalancing the MT dynamics in mitotic cells, causing mitotic defects and decreasing the cell proliferation rate. Bottom panel: Once overexpressed in tumorigenic cells (e.g., MB), Prune_1 was reported to enhance canonical TGF-b pathways via interaction with Nm23-H1, thus increasing phosphorylated SMAD2 and leading to OTX2 upregulation, PTEN inhibition, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) activation (through the upregulation of N-cadherin). Prune_1 was also shown to enhance canonical Wnt signaling through its interaction with GSK-b, which causes the increase of its inhibitory phosphorylation on Ser9 and Ser21 residues, thus leading to the activation of b-catenin. Through the activation of these two signaling cascades, Prune_1 can also take part in extracellular pathways, thus increasing the secretion of Wnt3a and IL17F and modulating the protein contents of extracellular vesicles (EVs). These actions are responsible for the increased proliferation rate of tumorigenic cells and their metastatic dissemination.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
FB and CS performed the expression analyses and generated the protein network and the gene ontology. VF and MZ wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the data and contributed to the final work.