The Influence of Hearing Impairment on Mental Age in Down Syndrome: Preliminary Results

Introduction

The increased life expectancy for patients with Down Syndrome (DS) has elicited renewed interest in the factors that may contribute to their characteristic poor linguistic development, overall intellectual disability, and the developmental trajectory associated with long-term cognitive decline in this population (1, 2). In adult population with DS, sleep quality, changes in emotional/behavioral functioning, gait dyspraxia, and language skills havechanges in emotional/behavioral functioning, gait dyspraxia, and language skills have been identified as important predictors of cognitive decline (2–6). In parallel, various factors have been observed to affect cognitive function in pediatric population with DS, such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the history of cardiac interventions (HCI) (7–9). Whereas we know too little about the overall developmental trajectories of cognitive decline in DS, it has been recently shown that intelligence, adaptive functioning, and motor skills in adolescents with DS are strongly correlated with their mental age in early childhood and that congenital heart defects may have a negative impact on language outcomes (10, 11). Therefore, understanding cognitive functioning early in life may be important in charting cognitive decline over time (1, 12).

A possible detrimental factor for language abilities is hearing impairment (HI) (13), present in up to 90% of patients with DS (14). It is unknown, however, whether the HI may have a direct impact also on the cognitive performance and on mental age growth in these patients. The aim of the present study is to investigate the attested influence of HI on auditory and receptive language skills in young children with DS, prior to their audiological care/rehabilitation. Furthermore, the influence of HI on mental age in the sample was explored, as well as other two factors measured in the sample that are known to affect cognitive abilities in pediatric population with DS, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (7) and the history of cardiac interventions (HCI) (8).

Materials and Methods

Participants

Among 150 children and adolescents with DS who were involved in the rehabilitation process at the “Associazione Sindrome di Down Onlus” rehabilitation center in Verona (Italy) at the end of 2019, 41 were referred for audiological evaluation at the Audiology Unit of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo of Trieste (Italy) because, for various medical or family reasons, they had not had previous access to audiological treatment. In order to obtain a more homogeneous group of young but nonetheless collaborative subjects who underwent auditory and language tests, we excluded children younger than 3 and older than 10 years, with native language other than Italian, with serious vision problems, and with severe cognitive (IQ < 40) or communication deficits (i.e., autism spectrum disorder). The final dataset thus included 17 patients (nine girls, eight boys, mean age = 5.84 years; SD = 2.12, range: 3–10 years).

Parents were informed about the possibility to use clinical data for research purposes and gave their written consent to participate before the assessment. The study was conducted according to the 1964 WMA Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Testing Procedure

All evaluations and data were obtained by a team of clinicians and therapists with specific expertise in DS and with particular attention to the audibility of the test stimuli. In addition to the audiological evaluation, auditory and receptive language skills, and cognitive abilities were measured. The information on chronological age, mental age, IQ, OSA, and HCI were collected from medical reports.

Audiometry testing was performed in a soundproof booth; sound field air conduction hearing threshold was estimated and averaged over frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Participants with either sensorineural or conductive hearing loss and with a mean hearing threshold >40 dB HL were categorized as having a significant HI (SHI). Auditory skills in everyday life were categorized using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), an index consisting of eight scores arranged in order of increasing difficulty (15). Receptive language skills were assessed by administering the relative subtest of the Battery for the assessment of language in children aged 4 to 12 (BVL_4-12) (16). Percentage of correct responses was reported for each child. Nonverbal mental age and cognitive function (IQ) were estimated with the Leiter-R (17), an individually administered test designed to assess nonverbal cognitive functions in ages 2–20. Mental age was estimated from the W-scale estimate of ability and chronological age from a W-scale (a Rasch-based score) age equivalence for each month of age (18). OSA-related neurobehavioral morbidity was assessed with the 22-item Sleep Related Breathing Disorder scale of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) (7). A score higher than 8 was associated with the presence of pediatric OSA (7).

Data Analysis and Availability

To describe the sample, IQ, PSQ scores, mental and chronological age, auditory performance and receptive language scores were compared in children with or without SHI using a series of Welch two sample t-tests controlled for multiple comparisons. Welch t-tests were used to control for the unequal variances of the sample.

To assess possible relations between mental age and factors that potentially affect cognitive function, bivatiate correlations (Pearson method) between mental and chronological age in children with and without SHI were computed, as well as the correlations in children with and without HCI and OSA. Partial correlations were not possible since splitting variables were categorical, whereas multiple regression analysis did not result in constructing valid models due to the scarcity of the data. The anonymised dataset is publicly available at https://osf.io/chw8n/.

Results

Nine out of 17 children in the dataset were affected by a SHI. Children with and without SHI did not differ in chronological age, mental age and IQ, the factors that otherwise affect auditory and language skills (Table 1). Conversely, children with SHI had significantly lower results in auditory performance (CAP) and marginally significantly lower results in receptive language scores (BVL) (Table 1). BVL scores, however, showed significant positive correlation with the mental age in children without SHI [R = 0.7, t (6) = 2.399, p = 0.05], but not in children with SHI [R = 0.422, t (7) = 1.233, p = 0.258]. These results confirm that the presence of SHI may crucially affect auditory and language abilities in children with DS. Chronological age, mental age, IQ, CAP, and BVL scores were furthermore compared when children were split based on the presence or absence of OSA or HCI, but the differences were not significant.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Mean mental age, chronological age, IQ, Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) scoring, auditory performance category (CAP), and receptive language (BVL) scoring in patients with and without an SHI, and the results of the non-parametric t-tests of the differences between the two subgroups.

To assess the potential role of SHI to the mental age growth, we have run separate correlation analyses between mental and chronological age for children with and without SHI. In children without SHI, mental age is positively correlated with the chronological age [R = 0.75, t (6) = 2.752, p = 0.033], indicating that mental age progresses steadily with growing. Conversely, children with SHI exhibited no significant correlation between the mental and chronological age [R = 0.227, t (7) = 2.752, p = 0.556], indicating the lack of progress in intellectual performance relative to the chronological age (Figure 1A). Mental age is also positively correlated with the presence of HCI[R = 0.723, t (8) = 2.961, p = 0.018], but not with the presence of OSA (Figures 1B,C). However, there is little overlap between SHI and HCI or OSA; in fact, five of nine children with SHI have been identified with OSA and there is no difference between the PSQ scores in children with and without SHI (Table 1); furthermore, only three of nine children with SHI have had HCI. We therefore conclude that their relation to the mental age may be independent.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Scatterplot showing the mental age relative to the chronological age in patients with and without a SHI (A), with and without the history of cardiac interventions (HCI) (B), and with and without OSA (C). The lines represent the linear regression function for each subgroup. The patient with all three conditions overlapping is circled on each graph.

Discussion

The present study highlights the significant impact of SHI not only on auditory and receptive language abilities, but also on mental age growth in young patients with DS.

Our results confirm data from the previous DS cohort report in which children with DS and a history of HI had lower receptive and productive language skills than children without such a history (13). They also partially confirm previous reports on the impact of OSA and heart diseases on neurocognitive development of children with DS (7, 8). Possibly, co-morbidity of these factors leads to further decline in neurocognitive functions, as indicated by the case with all three conditions (Figure 1). The novel contribution of the present study, however, is the result indicating that the growth trend of mental age in children with DS may be reduced also by the effect of SHI. These, albeit very preliminary data could add a new perspective on the management of intellectual disability in DS, emphasizing the role of early diagnosis and treatment of HI in order to minimize the factors that may have a detrimental impact on mental and intellectual abilities in DS later in life. This is particularly relevant considering the high prevalence of HI (14) and the progeroid course in DS characterized by early dementia (19).

Growing literature emphasizes the impact of HI on the outset and progression of dementia, but very little is known about its role in DS. The impact of SHI to mental age growth at an early age could have long-lasting consequences on autonomy and quality of life, and possibly also on the outset and progression of dementia in DS. Due to the numerically very limited cohort, the current results should be considered preliminary. Further research is needed to clarify whether hearing deprivation due to SHI represents a causal factor or a mediator of cognitive functioning in individuals with DS. Future longitudinal studies could concurrently evaluate the impact of audiological treatment on improving functional outcomes and progression of cognitive decline in individuals with DS (1).

HI is a modifiable condition, and effective audiological treatment and rehabilitation are today feasible since the first months of life, minimizing the hearing deficit and its consequences. Yet, audiological assessment of patients with DS is frequently complex and severely delayed as a consequence of multiple life-threatening conditions that influence the clinical management in the first years of life. Nonetheless, professionals involved in the healthcare management of these patients should consider the possible presence of HI as a red-flag not only of a language disorder but possibly also of reduced mental age growth.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in the OSF repository at the following address: https://osf.io/chw8n/.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

AS, DB, GP, and EO: study concept and design. EB, SB, AS, DB, and GP: acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. DB, AF, MB, and GP: drafting of the manuscript. EO: study supervision. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Lukowski AF, Milojevich HM, Eales L. Cognitive functioning in children with down syndrome : current knowledge and future directions. Advances in Child Development and Behavior. (2019) 257–289. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2019.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Grieco J, Pulsifer M, Seligsohn K, Skotko B. Down syndrome: cognitive and behavioral functioning across the lifespan. Am J Med Genet Part C. (2015) 149:135–49. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Fernandez F, Edgin JO. Poor sleep as a precursor to cognitive decline in down syndrome : a hypothesis. J Alzheimer's Dis Park. (2014) 3:1–11. doi: 10.4172/2161-0460.1000124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Mascarenhas L, Oliveira MC de, Figueiredo LM De, Cavalheiro EA, Bottino CM. Bereavement and behavioral changes as risk factors for cognitive decline in adults with Down syndrome. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2014) 10:2209–19. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S68831

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Pulsifer MB, Evans CL, Hom C, Krinsky-mchale SJ, Silverman W, Lai F, idr. Language skills as a predictor of cognitive decline in adults with Down syndrome. Alzheimer's Dement Diagnosis, Assess Dis Monit. (2020) 1:e12080. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Anderson-mooney AJ, Schmitt FA, Head E, Lott IT, Heilman KM. Gait dyspraxia as a clinical marker of cognitive decline in Down syndrome : A review of theory and proposed mechanisms. Brain Cogn. (2016) 104:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.02.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Chervin RD, Hedger K, Dillon JE, Pituch KJ. Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ): validity and reliability of scales for sleep-disordered breathing, snoring, sleepiness, and behavioral problems. Sleep Med. (2000) 1:21–32. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9457(99)00009-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Alsaied T, Marino BS, Esbensen AJ, Anixt JS, Epstein JN, Cnota JF. Does Congenital heart disease affect neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with down syndrome? Congenit Hear Dis. (2016) 11:26–33. doi: 10.1111/chd.12322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Visootsak J, Mahle WT, Kirshbom PM, Huddleston L, Caron-besch M, Ransom A. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children with Down Syndrome and Congenital Heart Defects. Am J Med Genet Part A. (2011) 2688–91. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Pieter J, Maurice-stam H, Houtzager BA, Rozenburg-marres SLR Van, Oostrom KJ, Grootenhuis MA. Growing up with Down syndrome : Development from 6 months to 10.7 years. Res Dev Disabil. (2016) 59:437–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Visootsak J, Hess B, Bakeman R, Adamson LB. Effect of congenital heart defects on language development in toddlers with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. (2013) 57:887–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01619.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Rosser TC, Edgin JO, Hamilton D, Allen EG, Dooley KJ, Anand P. Associations between medical history, cognition, and behavior in youth with down syndrome: a report from the down syndrome cognition project. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. (2018) 123:514–28. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-123.6.514

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Laws G, Hall A. Early hearing loss and language abilities in children with Down syndrome. Int J Lang Commun Disord. (2014) 49:333–42. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kreicher KL, Weir FW, Ma SAN, Meyer TA. Characteristics and Progression of Hearing Loss in Children with Down Syndrome. J Pediatr. (2017). 193:27–33.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Gregory S. Young deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: early assessment package for monitoring progress. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. (2005) 69:175–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Marini A, Marotta L, Bulgheroni S, Fabbro F. Batteria per la Valutazione del Linguaggio in Bambini dai 4 ai 12 anni. Battery for the assessment of language in children from 4 to 12 years Firenze. Italy: Giunti OS. (2015).

17. Roid GH, Miller LJ. Leiter international performance scale-revised (Leiter-R). Let 10 Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting. (1997). doi: 10.1037/t05120-000

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Roid GH, Woodcock RW. Uses of Rasch scaling in the measurement of cognitive development and growth. J Outcome Meas. (2000). ;4:579–94.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Anzivino R, Paludetti G, Conti G, Picciotti PM, Carf A, Brandi V. Audiologic assessment in adults with down syndrome. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. (2017) 122:333–41. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.4.333

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar