Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Pediatr., 29 May 2024
Sec. Neonatology
Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1427503

Editorial: Neonatal sepsis: current insights and challenges

  • 1Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Nikaia General Hospital “Aghios Panteleimon”, Piraeus, Greece
  • 2Department of Neonatology Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
  • 3Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, “Elena Venizelou” Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 4Microbiology Department, “Saint Savvas” Oncology Hospital, Athens, Greece

Editorial on the Research Topic
Neonatal sepsis: current insights and challenges

The incidence of bacterial sepsis ranges from 1 to 10 cases per 1,000 live births, with a 4-fold to 10-fold increase in preterm neonates (14). Despite the significant progress in neonatal care, sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), accounting for 243,000 deaths per year globally (58).

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently identified the need to reduce the burden of neonatal sepsis as the Sustainable Development Goal 3, aiming to decrease neonatal mortality to at least 12 per 1,000 live births by 2030 (9). The reduction of sepsis-related deaths in low-and middle-income countries is essential in order to achieve this goal (10). The incidence of neonatal sepsis widely varies among different countries and territories, reflecting differences in health resources, maternal and neonatal risk factors, and prevention strategies (5, 11). National and regional data should be considered for the implementation of successful measures for decrease of the incidence and mortality of neonatal infections. Li et al., collected data from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 to evaluate global features of incidence and mortality of neonatal sepsis and other neonatal infections (NSNIs), and to guide global and regional interventions for prevention and control of NSNIs. From 1990 to 2019, NSNI cases presented an annual global increase of 12.79%, while NSNI deaths decreased by 12.93% annually. A demographic and health survey in Ethiopia (2016) reported a significant number of neonatal deaths related to sepsis (12). Ambaye et al. conducted a trial to evaluate the time to sepsis recovery and its defining factors among neonates admitted in Woldia Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (WCSH), Northeast Ethiopia. The results indicated that time to sepsis recovery is adversely and independently associated with induction of labor and resuscitation at birth. Gezmu et al. using data from a public, tertiary-level hospital in Botswana, evaluated multiple risk factors and identified sepsis as an independent risk factor for pulmonary hemorrhage. Candida infection ranks as the third most common cause of neonatal late-onset sepsis, with Candida albicans being the most frequently isolated species. However, there has been a recent increase in the incidence of non-albicans Candida sepsis (13), including Candida glabrata, a case of which is reported by Parramon-Teixido et al. describing a urinary tract infection in a preterm neonate.

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is another crucial complication that primarily affects premature infants and is characterized by inflammation, similar to sepsis. Additionally, both conditions present non-specific, often overlapping, clinical symptoms and signs, rendering their differential diagnosis difficult (1416). The better comprehension of pathophysiological mechanisms of sepsis and NEC, essential for the improvement of timely and accurate diagnosis and treatment, is necessary. Jiang et al. evaluated the role of the proportion of large platelets (PLCR) and platelet crit (PCT) in prediction of NEC in low birth weight (LBW) neonates. Results of this study indicated that 2/100 LBW neonates were at risk of NEC and that sepsis and anemia were main factors associated with NEC. Stratification of confounding factors revealed the superiority of PLT activation (especially PLCR), compared to PLT count, in predicting NEC occurrence in non-septic, LBW neonates.

Early detection of neonatal sepsis is challenging (5). Delayed treatment increases mortality, while treating neonates with mild symptoms and signs or solely risk factors results in overtreatment and unnecessary use of antibiotics. The identification of an optimal biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of neonatal sepsis is the target of ongoing research. Inflammatory biomarkers seem promising; yet, only a few have been incorporated in clinical practice. Kumar et al. analyzed hematologic and physiologic biomarkers of late-onset sepsis and NEC in very low birthweight neonates. A validated sepsis risk score (Pulse Oximetry Warning Score, POWS) (17) was used to test whether plasma biomarkers correlate with physiological biomarkers of sepsis and concluded that inflammatory biomarkers discriminated between late-onset septicemia due to Gram-negative or NEC and all other septic or non-septic conditions.

In general, the diagnostic tools currently used for sepsis are invasive and time-consuming. Newer, non-invasive analytical methods could detect an infection early and also identify the pathogen. Bous et al. developed a method to analyze the profile of volatile organic compounds of bacterial species. Multicapillary column-coupled ion mobility spectrometry was used and found appropriate for the identification and differentiation between specific bacteria, emerging as a useful in vitro diagnostic tool.

Purulent ophthalmic discharge poses a clinical dilemma in NICU setting, considering its potential association with late-onset sepsis. Gad et al. did not report a statistically significant correlation between purulent conjunctivitis with a positive swab culture and late-onset sepsis. Post-catheter removal sepsis (PCRS) is a notable complication of indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) in neonates, attributed to disruption of biofilms formed along the catheter tip during removal of CVCs. The prevention of PCRS with the use of antibiotics during removal of CVCs remains debatable. Ji et al. conducted a meta-analysis, and according to their results, the use of antibiotics within 12 h of CVC removal does not significantly reduce PCRS, but is associated with reduced post-catheter removal blood stream infection.

Human milk has proved protective against neonatal sepsis and other infections, particularly in preterm neonates (18). A study by Moliner-Calderón et al. showed that any feeding with human milk was associated with a reduction in the need for vasoactive drugs in septic neonates, encouraging further research to clarify whether feeding with human milk directly affects neonatal patterns of cardiovascular maturation.

The present research topic has inspired significant focus on neonatal sepsis. Better understanding of this condition, its heterogeneity, epidemiology, and pathophysiology will help optimize short-term and long-term outcome and reduce burden on society. Neonatal sepsis has an impact that extends throughout life, and future studies should incorporate morbidity, mortality, long-term results and direct and indirect cost. This collection of sepsis-related articles in the current issue of “Frontiers of pediatrics” highlights the contemporary understanding and gaps and limitations in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, along with areas for further research. More studies are required on this topic, nonetheless, recent developments are quite promising and intriguing.

Author contributions

RS: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. SP: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Data curation. AK: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. AT: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. NI: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank those who contributed manuscripts to this Research Topic of Frontiers in Pediatrics.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Derbala SGHNM, Eldin Hasan BB, El-Sayed HF. Performance of the hematological scoring system for early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit of a developing country. Infec Dis Trop Med. (2017) 3(4):429.

Google Scholar

2. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 Million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet (London, England). (2005) 365(9462):891–900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71048-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. (2005) 6(1):2–8. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000149131.72248.e6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sokou R, Ioakeimidis G, Piovani D, Parastatidou S, Konstantinidi A, Tsantes AG, et al. Development and validation of a sepsis diagnostic scoring model for neonates with suspected sepsis. Front Pediatr. (2022) 10:1004727. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1004727

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ershad M, Mostafa A, Dela Cruz M, Vearrier D. Neonatal sepsis. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. (2019) 7(3):83–90. doi: 10.1007/s40138-019-00188-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Chu Y, Perin J, Zhu J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet. (2016) 388(10063):3027–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31593-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet (London, England). (2018) 392(10159):1789–858. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32279-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Fleischmann C, Reichert F, Cassini A, Horner R, Harder T, Markwart R, et al. Global incidence and mortality of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. (2021) 106(8):745–52. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320217

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. WHO. Sustainable Development Goals—the goals within a goal: health targets for SDG 3 (September 11 2023). Available online at: https://www.who.int/sdg/targets/en/ (Accessed September 11, 2023).

10. Milton R, Gillespie D, Dyer C, Taiyari K, Carvalho MJ, Thomson K, et al. Neonatal sepsis and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries from a facility-based birth cohort: an international multisite prospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health. (2022) 10(5):e661–e72. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00043-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Giannoni E, Agyeman PKA, Stocker M, Posfay-Barbe KM, Heininger U, Spycher BD, et al. Neonatal sepsis of early onset, and hospital-acquired and community-acquired late onset: a prospective population-based cohort study. J Pediatr. (2018) 201:106–14.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.048

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa and Rockville, MD: CSA and ICF (2016).

Google Scholar

13. Sokou R, Palioura AE, Kopanou Taliaka P, Konstantinidi A, Tsantes AG, Piovani D, et al. Candida auris infection, a rapidly emerging threat in the neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review. J Clin Med. (2024) 13(6):1586. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061586

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sokou R, Mantzios P, Tsantes AG, Parastatidou S, Ioakeimidis G, Lampridou M, et al. Assessment of hemostatic profile in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Pediatr Res. (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02958-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Patel RM, Ferguson J, McElroy SJ, Khashu M, Caplan MS. Defining necrotizing enterocolitis: current difficulties and future opportunities. Pediatr Res. (2020) 88(Suppl 1):10–5. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1074-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Jones IH, Hall NJ. Contemporary outcomes for infants with necrotizing enterocolitis—a systematic review. J Pediatr. (2020) 220:86–92.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kausch SL, Brandberg JG, Qiu J, Panda A, Binai A, Isler J, et al. Cardiorespiratory signature of neonatal sepsis: development and validation of prediction models in 3 NICUs. Pediatr Res. (2023) 93(7):1913–21. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02444-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Roldan VD T, Urtecho S M, Gupta J, Yonemitsu C, Cárcamo CP, Bode L, et al. Human milk oligosaccharides and their association with late-onset neonatal sepsis in Peruvian very-low-birth-weight infants. Am J Clin Nutr. (2020) 112(1):106–12. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa102

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neonatal sepsis, inflammatory biomarkers, neonates, bacterial species, necrotizing enterocolitis

Citation: Sokou R, Parastatidou S, Konstantinidi A, Tsantes AG and Iacovidou N (2024) Editorial: Neonatal sepsis: current insights and challenges. Front. Pediatr. 12:1427503. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1427503

Received: 3 May 2024; Accepted: 17 May 2024;
Published: 29 May 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by: Eugene Dempsey, University College Cork, Ireland

© 2024 Sokou, Parastatidou, Konstantinidi, Tsantes and Iacovidou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rozeta Sokou, sokourozeta@yahoo.gr

Download