Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Photobiol.
Sec. Human Skin Photobiology
Volume 2 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphbi.2024.1346921

Evaluating Hyperpigmentation: Is invasion of the skin necessary? Provisionally Accepted

 Redina Bardhi1  Mohsen Mokhtari2  Marissa Ceresnie2 Iltefat H. Hamzavi2 Henry W. Lim2 Tasneem F. Mohammad2  Indermeet Kohli2*
  • 1Henry Ford Hospital, United States
  • 2Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Receive an email when it is updated
You just subscribed to receive the final version of the article

Background: The combination of long wavelength ultraviolet A1 radiation (LWUVA1) and visible light (VL) has been shown to produce photodamage and the majority of organic sunscreens lack protection against this spectrum. Currently, established testing protocols for VL photoprotection are lacking. Objective: To compare pigmentation assessment methods, including Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scoring, Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS), and immunohistochemistry, to assess the utility of each in evaluating VL+LWUVA1 induced pigmentation.Methods: Anonymized IGA, DRS, and immunohistochemistry data for 37 subjects (Fitzpatrick skin phototypes IV-VI) was retrospectively analyzed for pigment evaluation.Pigmentation was induced on the subjects' backs with VL+LWUVA1 (0-0.5% UVA1) irradiation at a dose of 480 J/cm². Comparisons were made for all three assessment techniques between non-irradiated skin and VL+LWUVA1 irradiated skin, as well as between pure VL (0% UVA1) and VL+LWUVA1 (0.5% UVA1) irradiated sites. All comparisons were made for data collected approximately 24 hours after irradiation to evaluate persistent pigment darkening (PPD).Results: Among all 37 subjects, both IGA scores and DRS detected a statistically significant difference in PPD between irradiated and non-irradiated sites, as well as between VL+LWUVA1 and pure VL irradiated sites. However, MART-1/Melan-A did not indicate a statistically significant difference in PPD between irradiated and non-irradiated sites or between VL+LWUVA1 and pure VL irradiated sites.Conclusions: Subjective and objective noninvasive assessments were more sensitive in detecting VL+LWUVA1 induced pigmentation and should be preferred over invasive methods.

Keywords: visible light, ultraviolet A1, Photoprotection, Threshold dose, Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, Hyperpigmentation

Received: 30 Nov 2023; Accepted: 26 Apr 2024.

Copyright: © 2024 Bardhi, Mokhtari, Ceresnie, Hamzavi, Lim, Mohammad and Kohli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: PhD. Indermeet Kohli, Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States