EH Domain-Containing 2 Deficiency Restricts Adipose Tissue Expansion and Impairs Lipolysis in Primary Inguinal Adipocytes

Lipid uptake can be facilitated via caveolae, specific plasma membrane invaginations abundantly expressed in adipocytes. The dynamin-related protein EH domain-containing 2 (EHD2) stabilizes caveolae at the cell surface. Here, we have examined the importance of EHD2 for lipid handling using primary adipocytes isolated from EHD2 knockout (Ehd2−/−) C57BL6/N mice. Following high-fat diet (HFD) feeding, we found a clear impairment of epididymal, but not inguinal, adipose tissue expansion in Ehd2−/− compared with Ehd2+/+ (WT) mice. Cell size distribution analysis revealed that Ehd2−/− mice had a lower proportion of small adipocytes, and an accumulation of medium-sized adipocytes in both epididymal and inguinal adipose tissue. Further, PPARγ activity, FABP4 and caveolin-1 expression were decreased in adipocytes isolated from Ehd2−/− mice. Inguinal adipocytes isolated from Ehd2−/− mice displayed reduced lipolysis in response to beta adrenergic receptor agonist, which was associated with reduced phosphorylation of perilipin-1 and hormone sensitive lipase (HSL). This impairment could not be rescued using a cAMP analog, indicating that impaired lipolysis in Ehd2−/− primary adipocytes likely occurs at the level of, or downstream of, protein kinase A (PKA). Altogether, these findings pinpoint the importance of EHD2 for maintained intracellular lipid metabolism, and emphasize differences in mechanisms regulating lipid handling in various adipose-tissue depots.


INTRODUCTION
There is a global rise in obesity, and it is estimated that 38% of the population will have overweight by year 2030. During excess calorie intake, both hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adipocytes occur, ultimately causing adipose tissue expansion (Faust et al., 1978;Li et al., 2016). Adipocyte size predicts development of type 2 diabetes (Weyer et al., 2000;Acosta et al., 2016) and sustained overconsumption of calories leads to an accumulation of hypertrophic adipocytes that are less responsive to insulin (Salans et al., 1968;Salans and Dougherty, 1971;Smith, 1972;Franck et al., 2007). Impaired differentiation (Grunberg et al., 2014;Acosta et al., 2016) and a limited ability of adipocytes to expand further (McLaughlin et al., 2007) could contribute to adipose tissue dysfunction. Notably, the adipogenic potential varies in different adipose tissue depots (Wang et al., 2013;Jeffery et al., 2015). For example, a restricted capacity to increase the subcutaneous adipose tissue is hypothesized to favor expansion of visceral adipose tissue and underlie progression toward metabolic disorders (Wajchenberg, 2000;McLaughlin et al., 2011;Shulman, 2014).
Even though caveolae are undoubtedly involved in lipid metabolism, the specific mechanisms are currently not understood. While recent studies have addressed EHD2 to play a role in lipid handling, it is unclear how EHD2 deficiency affects these events in primary adipocytes. Furthermore, it is unknown if EHD2 influences gene transcription activity that is essential to sustain adipose tissue expansion. To address this, we have characterized adipose cell size distribution and lipolysis in primary adipocytes isolated from Ehd2 −/− mice challenged with high-fat diet (HFD) feeding. We demonstrate that EHD2 is necessary for both adipose tissue expansion and for maintenance of lipolysis in primary adipocytes.

Animals
C57BL6/N mice with global deletion of exon 3 of the Ehd2 gene (Ehd2 −/− ) as described (Matthaeus et al., 2020) were kindly provided by Oliver Daumke (MDC, Germany). Genotyping was carried out to confirm deletion of the Ehd2 gene. Ehd2 −/− and Ehd2 +/+ C57BL6/N mice (the latter used as WT control) were bred in parallel to generate sufficient number of animals for cellular analysis. Animals were on a 12 h light cycle with non-restricted food and water. Mice were fed either chow or HFD (D12492 60 E% fat content; Research Diets, New Brunswick, United States).

Ethics Statement
All animal procedures were approved by the Malmö/Lund Committee for Animal Experiment Ethics, Lund, Sweden, and were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Western Blot
Following incubations, cells were washed with KRH medium without BSA and subsequently lysed in a buffer containing Frontiers in Physiology | www.frontiersin.org 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 0.27 M sucrose, 1% NP-40, and complete protease-and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 × g and protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method. Samples were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrotransfer to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with non-fat dry milk [10% (w/v)] and probed with the indicated antibodies. Detection was performed using horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence reagent. The signal was visualized using a BioRad Image camera (Biorad, Hercules, United States).

Fluorescence Microscopy
Imaging was performed using a Nikon A1 plus confocal microscope with a 60× Apo DIC oil immersion objective with a NA of 1.40 (Nikon Instruments) and appropriate filter sets. Images were acquired with NIS-Elements, version: 4.50.02 (Laboratory Imaging). Isolated cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and labeled with antibodies in a buffer containing 1% BSA, 1% goat serum, and 0.05% saponin 1-2 h. For neutral lipid staining, cells were stained with Bodipy 493/503 and for mitochondria we used Mitotracker. For imaging of primary adipocytes, we used previously described protocol .

Electron Microscopy
For standard trans-electron microscopy, adipose tissue was fixed overnight using 1% PFA and 3% glutaraldehyde, followed by dehydration using methanol series (20, 40, 60, 80, and 100%) 30 min each, de-lipidated using dichloromethane for 1 h, and then rehydrated with reverse methanol series. Methanol was diluted in KRBH without BSA. The samples were fixed using osmium-tannic acid-osmium (OTO) for 1 h each, washed in KRBH without BSA, dehydrated using ethanol series and embedded in EPON.

Lipolysis
Lipolysis was determined by measuring glycerol release, as described previously (Hansson et al., 2016). In short, cells [10% (v/v) cell suspension] were treated with or without isoprenaline (ISO; 10 nM), or a combination of insulin (1 nM) and ISO (10 nM) for 30 min. Cell medium was subsequently removed for enzymatic determination of the glycerol content. In short, 100 μl free glycerol reagent was added to 30 μl sample. Absorbance at 540 nm was measured after incubating for ~15 min at room temperature. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate. In a separate set of experiments, cells were pre-incubated (10 min) with OPC3911 (10 μM), Rolipram (10 μM) or DMSO 0.1% (control), followed by 30 min stimulation with or without ISO (10 nM) or a combination of insulin (1 nM) and ISO (10 nM). For experiments where DcAMP was used, cells were pre-incubated for 10 min and then treated with or without ISO (10 or 1,000 nM) or DcAMP (100 or 1,000 μM) for 30 min. Glycerol release was measured as stated above.

RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted using miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen #74104). RNA purity and concentration were assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). PCR-reactions were performed using the Quantifast SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (Qiagen #204156) and Quantitect primer assays for 18S, Adrb3, Ehd2, and Plin1. Primer sequences are considered proprietary information by Qiagen. mRNA expression levels were measured using a StepOnePlus real-time thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems Waltham, United States) and quantitated using the ΔΔC T method as described by Livak and Schmittgen (2001). 18S rRNA was used for normalization throughout.

Cell Size Distribution
Adipose tissue samples were obtained from epididymal (EPI) and ING adipose depots. The adipose cell-size distributions were obtained using a Beckman-Coulter counter after osmium fixation as described previously (Li et al., 2016).

Liver Triglyceride Content
To determine the liver triglyceride concentration, ~100 mg frozen liver sample was homogenized using a motorized homogenizer in buffer containing 5% (w/v) NP-40. The homogenized samples were heated at 90°C for 3 min, cooled down for 15 min in room temperature, reheated at 90°C for 3 min, and then centrifuged at maximum speed for 2 min at 20°C. The supernatant was collected and placed in a 96-well plate with triglyceride reagent (Thermo Scientific) for triglyceride concentration determination.

Blood Analyses
Terminal serum samples were collected and blood glucose levels measured using OnetouchUltra2 (Lifescan, Milpitas, United States), and insulin levels assayed in serum using ELISA from Mercodia (Uppsala, Sweden). Serum concentration of free fatty acid (FFA) was measured using FFA assay kit (#ab65341) from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). for 20 min at room temperature. After the sections were rinsed with 60% isopropanol and then washed with distilled water and covered with a coverslip using permanent aqueous mounting medium (BUF058A, Biorad). Images were captured using an Olympus BX60 microscope.

Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Decreased Amount of Visceral Adipose Tissue in Ehd2 −/− Mice
To examine adipocyte function in the EHD2-deficient state, we made use of Ehd2 whole-body knockout (Ehd2 −/− ) mice (Matthaeus et al., 2020). Throughout the study, we used corresponding Ehd2 +/+ (WT) mice as control. Western blot analysis from various tissues confirmed global deletion of the EHD2 protein ( Figure 1A). Age-matched (~11-12 weeks) Ehd2 −/− mice displayed lower body weight (BW), but similar blood glucose and serum insulin levels compared with WT ( Figures 1B-D). We found Ehd2 −/− mice to have elevated liver triglyceride levels (p = 0.064; Figures 1E,F), a decreased amount of EPI adipose tissue, an increased amount of inguinal (ING) adipose tissue, and trends toward an increased amount of retroperitoneal (RETRO) adipose tissue compared with WT ( Figures 1G-I). Further, adipocyte size distribution analysis of EPI and ING adipose tissue revealed similar distribution curves comparing Ehd2 −/− and WT mice (Figures 1J,K). These data pinpoint that Ehd2 −/− mice not only have a trend toward increased liver triglycerides, in line with previous report (Claudia Matthäus et al., 2019), but also have reduced visceral fat mass compared with WT.

Impaired Expansion of Epididymal Adipose Tissue in Ehd2 −/− Mice Following HFD-Feeding
To test if a HFD further aggravated the shifted fat distribution, animals were fed 2 weeks of HFD, which has proven sufficient to induce weight gain and systemic insulin resistance in C57Bl6/J mice (Hansson et al., 2018).
Both Ehd2 −/− and WT mice rapidly gained weight to the same extent (Figure 2A), and no differences in food intake, blood glucose, serum insulin, or serum FFAs levels were observed (Figures 2B-E). Glucose and insulin levels increased significantly, and to the same extent, with HFD-feeding compared with chow in both genotypes (shown in Figures 1C,D, 2C,D), which confirms that C57Bl6/N mice also are prone to rapidly develop obesity and insulin resistance on a high fat diet. There was a trend toward increased liver triglyceride levels in Ehd2 −/− mice compared with WT ( Figure 2F). Further, Ehd2 −/− mice fed HFD had a significantly reduced amount of EPI fat tissue, while the ING fat depot was similar with WT ( Figures 3A,B). Correlation analysis demonstrated a significant difference in expansion of fat depots, comparing EPI and ING from WT and Ehd2 −/− (Figure 3C)

Decreased PPARγ Activity and Lowered Expression of Caveolin-1 and FABP4 in Adipocytes From Ehd2 −/− Mice
Ligand-activated transcription factor PPARγ is essential for adipogenesis (Rosen et al., 2002). Since EHD2 has been reported to influence transcriptional activity (Torrino et al., 2018), we next assessed if reduced EPI fat tissue expansion could reflect impaired PPARγ activity in Ehd2 −/− cells by using a PPARγ response element (PPRE) reporter assay. Indeed, primary EPI adipocytes from chow-fed Ehd2 −/− mice displayed 60-70% lower PPARγ activity compared with WT, both in non-stimulated cells, and in cells treated with the PPARγ ligand Rosiglitazone ( Figure 4A). Further, by western blot, we detected ~50% lower levels of FABP4 (fatty acid binding protein), one of the target genes of PPARγ (Kletzien et al., 1992), in both EPI and ING adipocytes isolated from Ehd2 −/− mice compared to WT, even though, less pronounced in ING cells following HFD-feeding (Figures 4C,D). The EHD2 knockout was confirmed by western blot using cell lysates and by confocal imaging (Figure 4B). These results suggest that EHD2 influences the transcriptional activity of PPARγ in primary adipocytes, which could explain the impaired expansion of the EPI adipose tissue depot. Possibly, this is due to lowered levels of FABP4 and intracellular fatty acids, the latter acting as endogenous PPARγ ligands, stimulating both lipogenic protein expression and differentiation of new adipocytes. In addition, the impaired response to the synthetic ligand Rosiglitazone in Ehd2 −/− cells also suggests that PPARγ itself or its co-activators are downregulated.
Further, knock-down of EHD2 is reported to affect the stability of caveolae rather than caveolae density (Moren et al., 2012;Ludwig et al., 2013;Matthaeus et al., 2020). In line with that, we could observe the presence of caveolae in intact adipose tissue from WT and Ehd2 − / − by electron microscopy (Figure 4E arrows indicate caveolae). Western blot analysis revealed that the main core protein of caveolae, caveolin-1, was reduced ~50% in adipocytes isolated from EPI and ING adipose tissue in Ehd2 −/− mice compared to WT after HFD-feeding (Figures 4C,D). Possibly, the lower caveolin-1 expression could affect the composition or stability of caveolar structures.

Decreased Phosphorylation of Perilipin-1 and HSL, and Decreased Lipolysis in Inguinal Adipocytes From Ehd2 −/− Mice
So far, the data suggest that absence of EHD2 causes impaired expansion of the adipocytes per se and also leads to reduced EPI adipose tissue mass. To investigate whether lack of EHD2 affects intracellular lipid handling, we next focused on lipolysis, the hydrolysis of triglycerides. In the following, lipolysis, measured as the release of glycerol in primary adipocytes, was examined in both non-stimulated (basal) and β-adrenergic [Isoprenaline (ISO)] stimulated cells. In chow-fed mice, basal but not ISO-stimulated lipolysis was significantly lower in EPI adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice compared with WT ( Figure 5A). In contrast, there was no significant difference in lipolysis in EPI adipocytes isolated after HFD-feeding in either non-or ISO stimulated cells comparing WT and Ehd2 −/− (Figure 5A). In ING adipocytes, no significant change was observed in chow-fed mice ( Figure 5B). Yet, both basal and ISO stimulated lipolysis was significantly reduced (~50%) in cells obtained from Ehd2 −/− mice compared to WT after HFD-feeding ( Figure 5B). To further elucidate mechanisms behind reduced lipolysis in ING cells obtained after HFD-feeding, we analyzed the phosphorylation of perilipin-1 and HSL, the main triglyceride lipase. We found that adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice displayed reduced phosphorylation levels of perilipin-1 (pS522) and HSL (pS563) following ISO stimulation ( Figure 5C), which is in line with reduced lipolysis (Figure 5B). Still, the expression of HSL and ATGL was unaltered, whereas total perilipin-1 level was significantly increased (~30%) in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes compared to WT ( Figure 5D). Possibly, the latter could reflect an increased lipid droplet surface area since small surface-associated lipid droplets were visible to a larger extent in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice ( Figure 5E).
To test if the reduced lipolysis was caused by impaired signaling at the level of beta adrenergic receptor or adenylate cyclase, we treated cells with dibutyryl-cAMP (DcAMP), a cell permeable, non-degradable cAMP analog. DcAMP activates protein kinase A (PKA) which phosphorylates and activates HSL and perilipin-1, and thereby induces lipolysis. Compared to WT, Ehd2 −/− adipocytes showed lower lipolysis upon DcAMP treatment ( Figure 6A). This suggests that the impaired lipolysis in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes occurs downstream of cAMP in the beta adrenergic signaling pathway. Notably, in this set of experiments, we could confirm that also at a very high dose of ISO (1,000 nM), lipolysis was significantly reduced in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes. Further, these results are also in agreement with similar gene expression of adrenergic receptors (Adr3b) in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice compared with WT ( Figure 6B). The trends toward increased gene expression of Plin1 mirrors the increased perilipin-1 protein expression shown in Figure 5D. Consistent with the impaired effects of ISO and DcAMP on lipolysis and phosphorylation of HSL and perilipin-1, we found reduced ISO-induced phosphorylation of several PKA targets in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice using a phospho-PKA motif specific antibody [P-RXX(S/T); Figure 6C]. Further, we examined the phosphorylation of the cAMP-responsive transcription factor CREB. CREB (pS133) was lower in non-stimulated cells from Ehd2 −/− mice compared with WT but increased in response to ISO ( Figure 6D). In comparison, the fold increase of phosphorylated perilipin-1 and HSL in response to ISO was lower in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes, whereas the fold increase of phosphorylated CREB was increased in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes ( Figure 6E). Thus, the ability to transmit cAMP-dependent signaling was not compromised for all targets in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice.
The Anti-lipolytic Effect of Insulin Is Diminished Despite Intact PDE3 Expression and Activity in Adipocytes Isolated From Ehd2 −/− Mice Next, we investigated if altered expression and activity of PDE3 could explain the impaired lipolysis in ING adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice. PDE3B is a major PDE family member expressed in adipocytes, responsible for degradation of cAMP. Thus, the expression level and activity of PDE3B have an impact on cAMP mediated signaling events, particularly the anti-lipolytic effect of insulin (Degerman et al., 2011).
The use of a PDE3 inhibitor (OPC3911) increased basal and ISO-mediated lipolysis to the same extent (~2-fold) in both genotypes (Figure 6F). We also detected similar protein expression of PDE3B in WT and Ehd2 −/− adipocytes ( Figure 6G). Still, lower lipolysis in ISO-stimulated cells in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes was observed even in the presence of OPC3911, indicating that increased PDE3B activity is not causing the impaired ISO-mediated lipolysis in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes ( Figure 6F).
Further, we investigated insulin's ability to suppress lipolysis, one of insulin's major metabolic effects in adipocytes. As expected, insulin efficiently suppressed ISO-induced lipolysis in WT (~50% reduction; Figure 6F, same data normalized to ISO are presented in Figure 6H). In contrast, much less suppression was observed in cells from Ehd2 −/− [~25% reduction (Figures 6F,H)]. Further, when co-stimulating with both OPC3911, ISO, and insulin, the anti-lipolytic effect of insulin was lost in WT as expected, but also in Ehd2 −/− adipocytes ( Figure 6F). In comparison, the use of a PDE4 inhibitor, Rolipram, increased ISO-induced lipolysis, but did not abolish insulin's effect in either genotypes ( Figure 6F).
Together, alterations of PDE3B expression/activity appear not to contribute to the low lipolysis observed in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− mice. Instead, the data suggest that a defect at the level of, or downstream of PKA, contributes to this phenotype.

DISCUSSION
In the present study, we demonstrate that lack of EHD2 clearly affects intracellular lipid handling, and the overall storage of excess energy. These effects are well in-line with the first description of the Ehd2 −/− mouse model, in which EHD2 was proposed to regulate fatty acid uptake in a caveolae-dependent fashion, and lowered EHD2 levels in the obese state were suggested to reflect altered lipid handling (Matthaeus et al., 2020).
We previously identified Ehd2 as one of the highest upregulated genes in adipose tissue during a short-term HFD intervention in mice (Hansson et al., 2018). Later, we confirmed by gene silencing and overexpression in vitro that EHD2 was necessary to sustain adipocyte maturation and lipid metabolism (Moren et al., 2019). While the initial characterization of Ehd2 −/− mice reported increased lipid uptake in cultured adipose cell models differentiated in vitro (Matthaeus et al., 2020), the novel findings in the current study include a marked impairment in lipolysis in primary adipocytes, and reduced expansion of the epididymal adipose tissue depot in Ehd2 −/− mice.
Based on previous knowledge of how EHD2 influences caveolae stability (Moren et al., 2012;Matthaeus et al., 2020), the EHD2-mediated effect on lipolysis is likely dependent on caveolar stability and/or caveolar property. Caveolin-1, the main structural protein of caveolae, is known to scaffold several signal molecules, among those G-protein coupled receptors (Insel et al., 2005). Moreover, adrenergic receptors were reported to be localized at caveolae (Schwencke et al., 1999), and their downstream signaling components to depend on caveolae integrity (Calaghan et al., 2008). The fact that we found lipolysis to be reduced in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− also when treated with a cAMP analog (DcAMP), and that the presence of a PDE3-inhibitor did not restore lipolysis, supports that this impairment is to be found downstream of the beta adrenergic receptor and adenylate cyclase. In line with this statement, caveolin-1 was shown to facilitate PKA-mediated phosphorylation of perilipin by bringing PKA physically close enough to fully phosphorylate perilipin in adrenergic-stimulated cells (Cohen et al., 2004). Possibly, the marked reduction of caveolin-1 level in EHD2-deficient cells detected herein could affect spatial FIGURE 6 | (DcAMP; 100 or 1,000 μM) for 30 min. (n = 5-8/group). (B) mRNA expression of Plin1, Adrb3, and Ehd2 from ING adipose tissue of HFD fed mice, assessed by RT-qPCR, 18S rRNA used as reference gene, data plotted as relative fold of WT (n = 11-13/group). (C) Western blot using a phospho protein kinase A (PKA) motif specific antibody [P-RXX(S/T)] in iso-stimulated ING adipocyte lysates from WT (n = 3) and Edh2 −/− (n = 4) mice on HFD. (D) Western blot showing phosphorylated levels of CREB pS133 in ING adipocytes, either non-stimulated or stimulated with isoprenaline (ISO; 30 min), isolated from HFD-fed mice (n = 3-4/ group), HSP90 was used as loading control. (E) Quantification of pCREB pS133 [images shown in (D)], Perilipin-1 pS522 and HSL pS563 (data re-plotted from Figure 5C), expressed as ISO/BASAL. (F) Lipolysis assessed by glycerol release in primary ING adipocytes of HFD-fed mice, where cells in suspension were preincubated for 10 min with or without PDE3 inhibitor OPC3911 (10 μM) or PDE4 inhibitor Rolipram (10 μM) followed by 30 min incubation in combination with or without isoprenaline (ISO; 10 nM) and insulin (1 nM). (G) Representative image and quantification of total protein levels of PDE3B from primary ING adipocytes from HFD-fed mice (n = 3-4/group), HSP90 used as loading control. (H) Insulin's (1 nM) anti-lipolytic effect in primary ING adipocytes from HFD-fed mice, data extracted from (F) and expressed as % of glycerol release from ISO-stimulated cells (n = 6/group). Data in (A,B,E-H) are presented as mean ± SD, and * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 were calculated using two-tailed Student's t-test.
PKA orientation, which in turn would affect the transmission of cAMP-dependent signaling downstream of PKA. Further, the increased perilipin-1 level in Ehd2 −/− cells could reflect an increased lipid droplet surface, since we observed an increased number of small surface-associated lipid droplets. The finding that insulin-mediated inhibition of lipolysis was clearly diminished in adipocytes from Ehd2 −/− compared with WT, despite lower adrenergic stimulated lipolysis, suggests that not only the response to beta adrenergic stimulation but also the response to insulin is hampered in Ehd2 −/− cells, which definitely is of interest to follow up in future work. Together, we propose that EHD2 is required to sustain signaling events relying on caveolae and interaction with its integral components.
The marked impairment of epididymal adipose tissue expansion in Ehd2 −/− mice could be caused by impaired adipogenesis, and an inability to increase the adipocyte number and pool of small cells (Faust et al., 1978). In support of this, we found lower proportion of small adipocytes, and that EPI adipocytes had attenuated PPARγ activity, the key driver of adipocyte differentiation (Rosen et al., 2002). Possibly, in adipocytes, EHD2 influences gene expression indirectly by affecting flux of intracellular fatty acids, which serve as PPARγ ligands. This is well in-line with previous reports, where EHD2 was proposed to exert transcriptional control (Torrino et al., 2018). Unfortunately, due to technical limitations, we could not verify PPARγ activity in isolated adipocytes from the inguinal depot. Thus, while primary adipocytes per se could expand despite EHD2 deficiency, the deposit of excess energy was, at the whole-body level, clearly shifted. Indeed, following HFD-feeding, adipogenesis occurs primarily in epididymal and not in inguinal adipose tissue depot (Wang et al., 2013;Jeffery et al., 2015), supporting the hypothesis that differences in depot weight following HFD-feeding in Ehd2 −/− mice reflect a reduced capacity to promote differentiation.
In contrast, the inguinal adipose tissue depot expanded similar comparing the two genotypes, but still displayed a similar decrease in small adipocytes and increase in medium-sized adipocytes as observed in the epididymal adipose tissue depot. Therefore, the impaired lipolysis in ING adipocytes cannot be explained by an increased pool of hypertrophic cells (Laurencikiene et al., 2011). Rather, depot-specific effects related to caveolar stability or function could explain this, and need to be addressed in future studies. The fact that the most prominent impairment of lipolysis was found in the beta adrenergically stimulated condition, or in experiments, where lipolysis was pharmacologically activated using a cAMP analog, could explain why the inguinal fat mass was not increased further in Ehd2 −/− compared with WT. Ehd2 −/− mice's ability to expand the subcutaneous adipose tissue could at least in part explain that similar levels of FFA, insulin, and glucose were observed in Ehd2 −/− compared with WT mice, despite slightly elevated liver triglyceride levels.
Taken together, in the present study, we report severe impairments of adipogenesis in the epididymal depot specifically, in EHD2 deficient mice. We also report that EHD2 is an essential component to sustain beta adrenergic lipolysis in inguinal adipocytes, possibly indirectly by influencing caveolae stability and thereby their ability to orchestrate signaling events. Thus, the discovery of EHD2 as an important factor involved in lipid handling in specific adipose tissue depots could provide important insights, necessary to detangle the mechanisms that ultimately limits the cell's ability to store excess energy.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

ETHICS STATEMENT
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Malmö/Lund Committee for Animal Experiment Ethics, Lund, Sweden.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Oliver Daumke (MDC, Germany) for providing the animals, and Maria Lindahl and Katarzyna Kawka for providing excellent technical support. We would also like to thank Lund University Bioimaging Center (LBIC) for assistance with sample preparation.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.740666/ full#supplementary-material Supplementary Figure S1 | Expansion of retroperitoneal (RETRO) fat depot following 2 weeks of HFD. Depot weight of RETRO adipose tissue (n = 22 animals/ group) collected from HFD-fed mice. Correlation of RETRO weight and body weight gain. Correlation of RETRO weight and epididymal or inguinal weight, each symbol (gray = WT; black = Ehd2 −/− ) represent one animal, line shows simple linear regression analysis.