<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Physiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Physiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Physiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-042X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">880737</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2022.880737</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Physiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Physiological Regulation of Growth, Hematology and Blood Gases in Chicken Embryos in Response to Low and High Incubation Humidity</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Branum et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Incubation Humidity and Embryo Physiology</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Branum</surname>
<given-names>Sylvia</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>Hiroshi</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1764318/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>Warren</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/8731/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>
<institution>Developmental Integrative Biology</institution>, <institution>Department of Biological Sciences</institution>, <institution>University of North Texas</institution>, <addr-line>Denton</addr-line>, <addr-line>TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Warren Burggren, <email>burggren@unt.edu</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Developmental Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1119869/overview">Servet Yalcin</ext-link>, Ege University, Turkey</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/124532/overview">Sandra Rugonyi</ext-link>, Oregon Health and Science University, United States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1192064/overview">Krzysztof Damaziak</ext-link>, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>880737</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>21</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>05</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Branum, Tazawa and Burggren.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Branum, Tazawa and Burggren</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Variations from a relative humidity (RH) of &#x223c;50&#x2013;60% can unfavorably alter chicken embryo development, but little is known of whether the embryo can mitigate these effects through physiological regulation. We examined effects of Low RH (25&#x2013;35%), and High RH (85&#x2013;93%) compared to Control RH (50&#x2013;60%) on hatchability, embryonic growth, hematology and blood gases and pH. Mean hatchability was not affected by RH. Yet, Low RH decreased wet body mass of advanced embryos (days 17&#x2013;19; d17-19), with lowered body water content compared with embryos of Control and High RH. However, dry body mass of developing (d11-19) embryos was not different between the three RH groups. Mean blood osmolality across development was higher in Low RH embryos and lower in High RH embryos compared with Control embryos. Mean blood lactate was higher in both Low and High RH embryos compared to Control embryos. Unexpectedly, hematological respiratory variables (Hct, [RBC], MCV, [Hb]) and blood gas variables (Po<sub>2</sub>, Pco<sub>2</sub>, pH, [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>]) across development were not affected by RH. Mean wet body mass at hatch (d20-22) was larger in High RH embryos compared with Low RH embryos, but mean wet and dry body mass upon euthanasia on d22 was unaffected. The ability of the three populations to physiologically regulate blood respiratory variables and blood acid-base balance was then examined by observing their responses to intrinsic hypoxemia and hypercapnia created by controlled partial egg submersion in water. Hct and [RBC] responses were less disturbed by submersion in High RH embryos compared with both Control and Low RH embryos, which showed major disturbance. Acid-base regulatory responses did not differ between RH groups. We conclude that, while different incubation RHs cause large differences in tissue water content and body mass, most hematological and acid-base regulatory capabilities are regulated near Control values.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>chicken embryo</kwd>
<kwd>incubation</kwd>
<kwd>relative humidity</kwd>
<kwd>embryonic development</kwd>
<kwd>acid-base balance</kwd>
<kwd>hematology</kwd>
<kwd>hydration</kwd>
<kwd>dehydration</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Chicken eggs are typically incubated at &#x223c;37&#x2013;38&#xb0;C of temperature and a &#x223c;50&#x2013;60% relative humidity (RH). Deviation of incubation temperature and/or humidity from these standard ranges produces abnormal embryonic development and hatchability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Noiva et al., 2014</xref>). While major deviations in incubation temperature are invariably lethal, it is less likely that even large deviations of RH created during artificial incubation causes total mortality, because embryos in the egg are protected by the finite water vapor conductance created by the eggshell. In typical desktop (non-commercial) egg incubators, RH falls no lower than &#x223c;20&#x2013;30% (Low RH) or higher than &#x223c;85&#x2013;93% (High RH). Even these relatively dry or wet conditions are not always lethal, but mortality is much increased in comparison with incubation at RH of &#x223c;50&#x2013;60% (Control) due ultimately to the degradation of embryonic physiology. A classic study showed that estimated mortality in chicken embryos increasing to 1/3&#x2014;&#xbd; of all eggs incubated at a RH of &#x223c;30&#x2013;20% and to &#xbd;-3/4 incubated at a highly elevated RH of &#x223c;85&#x2013;93% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ar and Rahn, 1980</xref>). These values compare to estimated minimal mortality of &#x223c;1/5 in Control eggs incubated at 50&#x2013;60% RH. Even when chicken embryos survived these extreme incubation RHs, some physiological functions are likely to be degraded even as others are strengthened to cope with altered RH. In an example of enhanced physiological function to meet this environmental challenge, presumably advantageous renal morphological and physiological remodeling occurs in chicken embryos surviving incubation in low humidity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bolin et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>In the current study, we examined potential effects of both elevated and reduced RH on embryonic growth, hematology, respiratory blood gases and acid-base variables. We created an additional physiological challenge by transient, partial water submergence in d17 eggs to judge the efficiency of physiological regulation in altered humidity conditions. We first hypothesized that, predictably, d17-21 embryos incubated in High RH will be hydrated and Low RH will be dehydrated, with lower hatchability in both groups compared with Control embryos. Additionally, we hypothesized that embryos incubated in High and Low RH will show altered physiological regulatory capabilities that could enhance survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Egg Incubation</title>
<p>All experiments with chicken embryos were performed at the University of North Texas in accordance with the protocol approved by the UNT Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Fertile eggs of the chicken (<italic>Gallus gallus domesticus</italic>, layer strain) were obtained weekly from a local hatchery. Upon arrival at the laboratory, eggs were weighed to 0.01&#xa0;g with an electronic balance. Very small (&#x3c;50&#xa0;g) or very large (&#x3e;70&#xa0;g) eggs were excluded from the study. Eggs were numbered in order of egg mass and divided equally into the three groups according to egg mass. The eggs in individual groups were placed at 12:00 in three Hova-Bator desk-top incubators (GQF Manufacturing, Savannah, Georgia) set to a temperature of 38 &#xb1; 0.5&#xb0;C. Control eggs were incubated at &#x223c;50&#x2013;60% RH (Control RH), while other two groups were incubated at &#x223c;20&#x2013;35% RH (Low RH) and &#x223c;85&#x2013;93% RH (High RH), respectively. The Low RH conditions was created by providing no water to the incubator, while the High RH was created by filling all available pools in the incubator with water. Relative humidity was monitored by Baro-Thermo-Hydrometers (Oregon Scientific, Tualatin, OR, United States).</p>
<p>This study was completed in a series of six incubation experiments between February 15<sup>th</sup> and November 20<sup>th</sup> in the same calendar year. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> outlines these experiments, providing n numbers and additional information on hatchability.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Hatchability of eggs incubated in Low, Control and High relative humidity determined from six separate experiments.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="left"/>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Hatching variable</th>
<th colspan="7" align="center">Egg set date</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Feb. 15<sup>th</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">Apr. 30<sup>th</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">Sep. 19<sup>th</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">Oct. 9<sup>th</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">Oct. 29<sup>th</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">Nov. 20<sup>th</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">Mean &#xb1; se</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="15" align="left">Relative Humidity (%)</td>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">CONTROL (50&#x2013;60%)</td>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Eggs Incubated</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Fertilized Eggs</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">18</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">22 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Hatchlings</td>
<td align="center">18</td>
<td align="center">17</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">16</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">16 &#xb1; 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hatchability of Set Eggs (%)</td>
<td align="center">64%</td>
<td align="center">61%</td>
<td align="center">71%</td>
<td align="center">57%</td>
<td align="center">46%</td>
<td align="center">32%</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">55 &#xb1; 6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hatchability of Fertilized Eggs (%)</td>
<td align="center">75%</td>
<td align="center">74%</td>
<td align="center">87%</td>
<td align="center">70%</td>
<td align="center">62%</td>
<td align="center">50%</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">70 &#xb1; 5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">LOW (25&#x2013;35%)</td>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Eggs Incubated</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Fertilized Eggs</td>
<td align="center">19</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">20 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Hatchlings</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">14</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">12 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hatchability of Set Eggs (%)</td>
<td align="center">36%</td>
<td align="center">50%</td>
<td align="center">46%</td>
<td align="center">25%</td>
<td align="center">54%</td>
<td align="center">43%</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">42 &#xb1; 4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hatchability of Fertilized Eggs (%)</td>
<td align="center">53%</td>
<td align="center">70%</td>
<td align="center">65%</td>
<td align="center">4%7</td>
<td align="center">71%</td>
<td align="center">52%</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">60 &#xb1; 4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">HIGH (85&#x2013;93%)</td>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Eggs Incubated</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Fertilized Eggs</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="center">21</td>
<td align="center">19</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">22 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x23; of Hatchlings</td>
<td align="center">16</td>
<td align="center">18</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">15 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hatchability of Set Eggs (%)</td>
<td align="center">57</td>
<td align="center">64</td>
<td align="center">46</td>
<td align="center">54</td>
<td align="center">54</td>
<td align="center">54</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">55 &#xb1; 2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Hatchability of Fertilized Eggs (%)</td>
<td align="center">67</td>
<td align="center">82</td>
<td align="center">59</td>
<td align="center">63</td>
<td align="center">71</td>
<td align="center">79</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">70 &#xb1; 4%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Water loss from eggs was determined as the difference of egg mass from d0 to a given day.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Protocols</title>
<p>Examination of incubation RH effects focused on three categories of variables: hatching success, changes of physiological variables during the developmental process, and physiological regulatory capabilities in the face of environmental challenges (intrinsic progressive hypercapnia and hypoxia). On the day of experiment, individual egg mass was measured in the morning prior to blood sampling. Individual embryos were then euthanized after blood sampling and measured for wet and dry body mass.</p>
<sec id="s2-2-1">
<title>2.2.1 Hatchability</title>
<p>Fertile eggs with growing embryos were confirmed by candling on d4 of incubation and continuously incubated in their assigned RH level. Hatchability was determined as the percentage of successful hatchlings from the initial fertile eggs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-2">
<title>2.2.2 Hatchling Wet and Dry Body Mass</title>
<p>On d19 of incubation, the viable eggs in the three RH groups were measured for mass to nearest 0.01&#xa0;g. Water loss from the beginning of the incubation period was determined. The eggs in the three RH groups were transferred sequentially to hatchers consisting of desk-top incubators provided with 25 partitions equally divided by cardboard partitions and maintained at &#x223c;37&#xb0;C and &#x223c;60&#x2013;65% RH. These standardized hatching conditions were created to ensure that all embryos hatched under the same conditions, thus removing effects of different environmental humidity conditions during the hatching process. This assumed that any permanent changes related to development in high or low RH that had appeared during the entire process of development would not be quickly reversed during a final day leading up to hatching.</p>
<p>Hatchers were monitored every h from 0:700 to 21:00 every d until d22 to obtain newly hatched chicks and determine their wet body mass to the nearest 0.01&#xa0;g. On d22, hatchlings were transferred to a closed container and euthanized with isoflurane, immediately followed by determination of wet body mass to the nearest 0.01&#xa0;g. The carcasses were then placed on tared plastic trays and placed in a desiccating oven at 65&#xb0;C. The dry body mass was determined when the mass of body and tray changed by &#x3c; 0.01&#xa0;g during three consecutive days of dry mass measurement. Typically, this occurred after &#x223c;17&#x2013;19&#xa0;days of drying in the oven.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-3">
<title>2.2.3 Daily Water Loss</title>
<p>During the period from incubation d11 to d19, water loss from individual embryonated eggs on the target day was determined from the egg mass difference between d0 and the morning of the day prior to blood sampling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-4">
<title>2.2.4 Blood Sampling</title>
<p>The allantoic vein was located by candling and the location marked on the eggshell 1&#xa0;day before the target developmental day. On the target developmental day, a &#x223c;0.8&#xa0;cm square of eggshell was removed at the marked region. The now-exposed underlying allantoic vein was gently lifted by forceps through the hole in the eggshell. Arterialized blood from the allantoic vein was drawn into a 25-gauge needle attached to a 1&#xa0;ml sampling syringe which had been flushed in advance with heparinized saline. 200&#xa0;&#xb5;L of blood was withdrawn on d11, and 250&#xa0;&#xb5;L of blood withdrawn on each of all subsequent days. Since the allantoic vein of d19 embryos could not be candled accurately, arterialized blood was not always collected on d19.</p>
<p>Once blood had been collected, the sampled eggs were placed for at least 30&#xa0;min into an anoxic bag vented with N<sub>2</sub> to euthanize the embryos. Embryos minus allantoic membranes were then removed from the eggs, blotted with paper to remove surface fluids and wet body mass (WBM) measured to the nearest 0.01&#xa0;g. Dry body mass was then determined as described above for embryos. Body water content (% of embryo body) was calculated as: Water content &#x3d; 100 x (WBM&#x2014;DBM)/WBM.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-5">
<title>2.2.5 Hematology and Blood Gases</title>
<p>Immediately after collection, blood was gently transferred to a 0.15&#xa0;ml plastic vial. From this vial &#x223c;120&#xa0;&#xb5;L of blood was withdrawn and injected into a blood gas analyzer (ABL5, Radiometer Medical A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) to determine blood Po<sub>2</sub> (mmHg), Pco<sub>2</sub> (mmHg), pH and [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] (mmol L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). The blood remaining in the sampling syringe was transferred to the vial, thoroughly mixed and then injected in a blood cell counter (Coulter analyzer, A<sup>c</sup>&#xb7;10T, Beckman, United States) to measure red blood cell concentration ([RBC], 10<sup>6</sup>&#xa0;&#x3bc;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and hemoglobin concentration ([Hb], g%). A further &#x223c;10&#xa0;&#xb5;L of blood was used to measure blood osmolality (Osm, mmol&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) using a vapor pressure osmometer (Vapro 5520, Wescor, United States). With one drop of blood lactate ion concentration ([La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>], mmol&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was determined with a lactate meter (Nova Lactate Plus Meter, Nova Biomedical, MA, United States). Finally, &#x223c;60&#xa0;&#xb5;L of blood was transferred into each of two hematocrit tubes. The tubes were sealed and centrifuged for 5&#xa0;min at 10,000&#xa0;rpm to determine hematocrit (Hct, &#xb1;0.1%) (Readacrit Centrifuge, Becton Dickinson, United States). The mean value of duplicate determinations was Hct for this embryo. From the measured values of Hct, [RBC] and [Hb], the following mean corpuscular variables were calculated; mean corpuscular volume (MCV &#x3d; 10 x Hct/[RBC] in &#xb5;m<sup>3</sup>), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH &#x3d; 10 x [Hb]/[RBC] in pg) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration ([MCHb] &#x3d; 100 x [Hb]/Hct in g%).</p>
<p>Blood acid-base status was represented on a Davenport diagram, constructed by plotting Pco<sub>2</sub> isopleths calculated from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation using a CO<sub>2</sub> solubility factor of 0.0308&#xa0;mmol&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> mmHg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and a serum carbonic acid pK&#x2019; according to pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Severinghaus et al., 1956a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">b</xref>). A mean slope of -16&#xa0;mmol&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> pH<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> was used for the buffer line of chicken embryo blood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Burggren et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-6">
<title>2.2.6 Experimental Challenge to Assess Physiological Regulation of Hematological and Acid-Base Disturbances</title>
<p>Embryos under the various RH incubation regimes were assessed for altered regulation of hematological variables, blood respiratory gases and acid-base balance when experimentally exposed to progressive intrinsic hypoxia and hypercapnia. These conditions were created by partial egg submersion in water, previously established as a method for testing embryonic physiological regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andrewartha et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Branum et al., 2016</xref>). On d16 of incubation, the viable eggs in the three RH groups had a red line drawn on the egg&#x2019;s mid-line. Details of the submersion process are described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andrewartha et al. (2014)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Branum et al. (2016)</xref>. Each RH group was divided into four subgroups; 0&#xa0;h (Control without water submersion), 2, 6 and 24&#xa0;h of submersion. Submersion of the 24&#xa0;h group began on d16 so that it would end on d17, as for the other groups. All eggs were submersed with air cell down.</p>
<p>After the designated time of water submersion (2, 6 and 24&#xa0;h), each egg was removed from the water and the submerged half of the egg was immediately covered with Parafilm to preserve blood gas values during blood collection by continuing to eliminate gas exchange across the egg shell between environment and air cell. An area &#x223c;1&#xa0;cm across was created in Parafilm over the site of the allantoic vein and a small hole &#x223c;0.8&#xa0;cm across opened in the eggshell. Arterialized blood was immediately collected and analyzed for Pco<sub>2</sub>, pH and [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] with the blood gas analyzer and subsequently analyzed for all of the hematological variables described above.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Data were tested for normality and equal variance. Differences between means of multiple groups were tested by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc multiple comparison analysis to determine differences between individual group means. Multiple group means consisting of several subsets individually were examined by two-way ANOVA for the significance of difference between group means and between individual subsets. Significance was assumed at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05. All data were presented as means &#xb1;1&#xa0;S.E.M.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Hatchability and Hatchling Gross Morphology</title>
<p>Overall hatchability was 70 &#xb1; 5% for fertilized Controls (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 132), 60 &#xb1; 4% for Low RH (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 118) and 70 &#xb1; 4% High RH (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 132) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). There were no significant differences in % hatchability between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.203). There was also no significant relationship between incubation time and hatching time between the three experimental groups.</p>
<p>While hatchlings were not subjected to necropsy, we observed no gross morphological developmental disturbances, such as wing, beak or limb abnormalities, edema or abnormal yolk sac resorption.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Daily Egg Water Loss</title>
<p>Egg water loss during d11 to 19 of incubation significantly increased with development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and was significantly different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Average water loss during the designated period of incubation was 7.61 &#xb1; 0.08&#xa0;g (13.5 &#xb1; 0.1% of egg mass) for Low RH, 4.66 &#xb1; 0.08&#xa0;g (8.2 &#xb1; 0.1%) for Control RH, and 2.26 &#xb1; 0.08&#xa0;g (4.0 &#xb1; 0.1%) for High RH. On d19 of incubation, the average water loss was 10.17 &#xb1; 0.24&#xa0;g (17.6 &#xb1; 0.4%), 6.50 &#xb1; 0.24&#xa0;g (11.2 &#xb1; 0.4%) and 2.92 &#xb1; 0.21&#xa0;g (5.0 &#xb1; 0.4%) for Low, Control and High RH, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Daily water loss (g) from eggs incubated at Control (&#x223c;50&#x2013;60%), Low (&#x223c;25&#x2013;30%) and High (&#x223c;80&#x2013;93%) relative humidity during the last half of egg incubation. Different letters for means in each of the three relative humidity groups indicate significant differences, while number of measurements (n) is shown in parentheses. Mean values at any given day of incubation (i.e., vertical comparison) for each of the three relative humidities are significantly different from each other (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). Daily water loss (WL in g) is expressed by the following linear regression equations; Low RH, WL &#x3d; 0.59&#xb7;Day-1.19 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001, <italic>t</italic> &#x3d; 14.17 for coefficient); Control RH, WL &#x3d; 0.46&#xb7;Day-2.22 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001, <italic>t</italic> &#x3d; 13.69); and High RH, WL &#x3d; 0.17&#xb7;Day-0.32 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001, <italic>t</italic> &#x3d; 9.03).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Wet and Dry Body Mass of Hatchlings</title>
<sec id="s3-3-1">
<title>3.3.1 Wet Body Mass</title>
<p>Developmental changes in wet body mass were significantly different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for effect of humidity) and were significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for development) with significantly different rate between groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for interaction of humidity and development) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). The increase in wet body mass during development was not different between Control and High RH groups, but mean wet body mass of Low RH group was significantly lower than that of Control and High RH groups during the last 3&#xa0;days of incubation (d17-19). Mean wet body mass at hatch was 43.20 &#xb1; 0.71&#xa0;g (Control), 40.65 &#xb1; 1.07&#xa0;g (Low RH) and 46.09 &#xb1; 1.18&#xa0;g (High RH), which differed significantly among the three groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.006). Pairwise multiple comparisons indicated a significant difference between Low and High RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.005). At hatchling euthanasia on d22, mean wet body mass had decreased to 37.02 &#xb1; 1.01, 35.73 &#xb1; 1.08 and 38.55 &#xb1; 1.42&#xa0;g for of Control, Low and High RH groups, respectively, with no significant difference between them (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.271).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Developmental changes in <bold>(A)</bold> wet and dry body mass and <bold>(B)</bold> body water content of embryos incubated at Control, Low and High relative humidity. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented. In most cases error bars are smaller than the symbol size. Means on any given day of incubation that are not significantly different from each other are enclosed by a box. <bold>(A)</bold> Wet and Dry Body Mass: Effect of RH and development on wet body mass and their interaction are all significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for all). Different uppercase letters indicate significant difference between development of embryos incubated at Control and High RH and lowercase letters indicate significant difference between development of embryos incubated at Low RH. Effect of development is significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), but there is no significant effect of RH on dry body mass of the three groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.695), and with no significant interaction between RH and development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.877). <bold>(B)</bold> Body Water Content: Effect of RH, development and their interaction on water content are all significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for all). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between developments of embryos incubated at Control RH. <italic>n</italic> values are as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-2">
<title>3.3.2 Dry Body Mass</title>
<p>Changes in dry body mass were significant across development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), but were not significantly different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.695 for effect of humidity), with no significant interaction of development and humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.877) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). The mean dry body mass at hatching was 9.44 &#xb1; 0.24, 9.41 &#xb1; 0.33 and 9.62 &#xb1; 0.36&#xa0;g for Control, Low and High RH groups, respectively, and the difference between RH groups was not significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.876).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Body Water Content</title>
<p>Daily changes in water content of embryos were significant across development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with significant interaction of development and RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). The daily changes of water content were not different between Control and High RH groups, but mean water content of Low RH group was significantly lower than that of High RH group during d16-19 and that of Control group on d19 of incubation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 Hematology</title>
<p>Developmental changes in Hct and [RBC] were not different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.616 and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.539 for effect of humidity on Hct and [RBC], respectively), but were significant across development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) for both Hct and [RBC]), with no significant interaction between humidity and development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.365 and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.395 for Hct and [RBC]) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Developmental changes in hematological variables of embryos incubated at Control, Low and High relative humidity. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented. Error bars are smaller than the symbol size. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences across development. Boxes enclosing statistically identical means are omitted for clarity. <bold>(A)</bold> Hct <bold>(%)</bold> is not significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.616) affected by RH (vertical comparison), but is significantly affected by day of development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction between the two variables (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.365). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences across development. <bold>(B)</bold> [RBC] is not significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.539) affected by RH (vertical comparison), but is significantly affected by development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction between the two variables (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.395). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference. <bold>(C)</bold> MCV is not significantly affected by RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.106) or development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.054) and their interaction is not significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.508). <bold>(D)</bold> [Hb] is not significantly affected by RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.799), but is affected by development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.226) between the two variables. <bold>(E)</bold> MCH is significantly affected by both RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.011) and development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), and the interaction between these two variables is significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.036). <bold>(F)</bold> [MCHb] is significantly affected by both humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.027) and development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.661) between the two variables. n values are as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Changes across development in MCV were not different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.106 for effect of humidity), nor were significant across development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.054) with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.508) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>).</p>
<p>Changes across development in [Hb] were significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), but were not different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.799), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.226) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3D</xref>).</p>
<p>Changes across development in MCH and [MCHb] were significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and these variables different significantly between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.011 and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.027 for MCH and [MCHb], respectively), with significant interaction for MCH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.036) or with no significant interaction for [MCHb] (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.661) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3E,F</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>3.6 Blood Chemistry</title>
<sec id="s3-6-1">
<title>3.6.1 Osmolality</title>
<p>Blood osmolality (Osm) did not change significantly across development in the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.787), but mean values of Osm were significantly different between the three groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for effect of humidity), with no significant interaction of development and humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.671) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). The mean Osm during the period d11-18 was 273 &#xb1; 1, 267 &#xb1; 1 and 263 &#xb1; 1&#xa0;mmol&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> for Low, Control and High RH, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Developmental changes in <bold>(A)</bold> blood osmolality (Osm) and <bold>(B)</bold> [Lactate] in embryos incubated at Control, Low and High relative humidity. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented. Means on any given day of incubation that are not significantly different from each other are enclosed by a box. <bold>(A)</bold> Blood Osmolality: The effect of RH on Osm (vertical comparison) is significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), but effect of development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.787) and their interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.671) are not significant. Mean Osm across development is shown to the right of each RH plot, and these values are significantly different from each other (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for any two comparisons), as indicated by uppercase letters. <bold>(B)</bold> [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>]: [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] was significantly affected by both humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001) and development (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.060). Mean [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] during the last half of incubation (D11-D19) is shown to the right of each RH plot, with uppercase letters indicating differences between means. Mean [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] values of Low and High RH groups are significantly higher than the Control value (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.002 for Low RH <italic>vs.</italic> Control RH, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.010 for High RH <italic>vs</italic>. Control RH, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.610 for Low RH <italic>vs</italic>. High RH). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences across development. <italic>n</italic> values are as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6-2">
<title>3.6.2 Lactate Concentration</title>
<p>Blood lactate ion concentration ([La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>]) changed significantly across development in all three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). Mean values of [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] were significantly different between three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001) with no significant interaction of development and humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.060), but there was no clear pattern of change associated with incubation RH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). The mean [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] of Low and High RH groups were 1.52 &#xb1; 0.07&#xa0;mmol&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and 1.47 &#xb1; 0.07 mmol L-1, respectively, which were not different from each other, but were both significantly higher than that of the Control group (1.20 &#xb1; 0.06&#xa0;mmol&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6-3">
<title>3.6.3 Blood gas Pressures and Acid-Base Balance</title>
<p>Changes across development in arterialized blood Po<sub>2</sub> and Pco<sub>2</sub> were both significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), but were no significant differences between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.35) and no significant interaction between development and humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.691 and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.134 for Po<sub>2</sub> and Pco<sub>2</sub>, respectively) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Developmental changes in blood gas pressures and acid-base balance in embryos incubated at Control, Low and High relative humidity. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented. In some cases error bars are smaller than the symbol size. Means on any given day of incubation that are not significantly different from each other are enclosed by a box. <bold>(A)</bold> Arterialized blood Po<sub>2</sub> and Pco<sub>2.</sub> Arterialized blood Po<sub>2</sub> and Pco<sub>2</sub> are not significantly affected by RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x2265; 0.359). Means on any given day of incubation that are not significantly different from each other (vertical comparison) are enclosed by a box. However, there is a significant effect of development on both Po<sub>2</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and Pco<sub>2</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interactions (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.691 for Po<sub>2</sub> and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.134 for Pco<sub>2</sub>). Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between development. <bold>(B)</bold> Acid-base balance. For clarity, acid-base variables for incubation days 13, 15 and 17 are omitted from this Davenport diagram. RH did not significantly affect blood pH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.133) or blood [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] (<italic>p</italic> &#x2265; 0.241), but there was a significant effect of development on pH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction between these variables (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.491 for pH and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.781for [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>]). n values are as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Changes across development in the pH and [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] of arterialized blood were both significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), but were not significant between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.136), with no significant interaction between development and humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.49) <bold>(</bold>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-7">
<title>3.7 Hematological and Acid-Base Disturbances Associated With Hypoxemia and Hypercapnia</title>
<sec id="s3-7-1">
<title>3.7.1 Hematological Variables</title>
<p>In response to half submersion of eggs in water with egg air cell down, Hct significantly increased (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) in all three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.005) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). Mean Hct during submersion was 35.6 &#xb1; 0.5, 36.1 &#xb1; 0.5 and 34.0 &#xb1; 0.5% for Control, Low and High RH groups, respectively. The increase in High RH group was significantly less compared with the increases in Control and Low RH groups, which did not differ from each other. However, the extent of increase in Hct with submersion length was not different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.232) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Hematological changes in response to 24&#xa0;h partial water submersion at d17 of incubation. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented. In some cases error bars are smaller than the symbol size. Means on any given day of incubation that are not significantly different from each other are enclosed by a box. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between submersion times. <bold>(A)</bold> Hct <bold>(%).</bold> Hct was significantly affected by both RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.005) and partial water submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.232). <bold>(B)</bold> [RBC]. [RBC] was significantly affected by RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001) but not partial water submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.185), with insignificant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.179) occurring between the two variables. <bold>(C)</bold> MCV. MCV was not significantly affected by RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.780), but was significantly affected by submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), with no significant interaction between the two variables (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.096). <bold>(D)</bold> [Hb]. [Hb] was significantly affected by humidity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) but not partial water submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.438), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.226) between the two variables. <bold>(E)</bold> MCH. MCH was not significantly affected by either RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.072) or submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.419), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.463) between the two variables. <bold>(F)</bold> [MCHb]. [MCHb] was significantly affected by submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) but not by RH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.333), with no significant interaction (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.550) between the two variables. <italic>n</italic> values for each condition and each hour of submergence are indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>[RBC] in the three RH groups was not significantly changed by any length of submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.185) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>). However, mean [RBC] during submersion (2.51 &#xb1; 0.03, 2.51 &#xb1; 0.03 and 2.39 &#xb1; 0.03 &#xd7; 10<sup>6</sup> &#xb5;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> for Control, Low and High RH groups, respectively), was significantly different (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001). [RBC] of High RH group was significantly lower compared with [RBC] of Control and Low RH groups, which were not different. The significant difference in [RBC] between the three RH groups was not changed by submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.179).</p>
<p>MCV significantly increased with submersion time (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) in all three RH groups, with no significant difference of magnitude of increase between groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.780) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6C</xref>). The interaction between effects of RH and submersion was not significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.096).</p>
<p>[Hb] was not significantly changed by any length of submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.438) in the three RH groups, but mean [Hb] during submersion; 9.6 &#xb1; 0.1, 9.7 &#xb1; 0.1 and 9.1 &#xb1; 0.1&#xa0;g% for Control, Low and High RH groups, respectively, was significantly different (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>). [Hb] of High RH group was significantly low compared with [Hb] of Control and Low RH groups that were not different. There was no significant interaction between the three RH groups for submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.226 for interaction) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>).</p>
<p>MCH was not changed by any length of submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.419) and mean MCH was not different between the three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.072) with no significant interaction between effects of RH and submersion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.463) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6E</xref>).</p>
<p>[MCHb] was significantly decreased by at all submersion times (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) in the three RH groups, but there was no significant difference of magnitude between RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.333) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6F</xref>). The interaction between RH and submersion was not significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.550).</p>
<p>[La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] was significantly affected by submersion in three RH groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] increased sharply after just 2&#xa0;h of submersion in all three humidity groups and stayed elevated through hour 6. By hour 24, however, [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] had declined in the Control and Low RH groups, but were still significantly elevated in the High RH group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] <bold>(A)</bold> and [Osm] <bold>(B)</bold> in response to 24&#xa0;h partial water submersion at d17 of incubation. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented. Means on any given day of incubation that are not significantly different from each other are enclosed by a box. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between submersion times. n values for each condition and each hour of submergence are indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>While the differences in [Osm] due to relative humidity differences was maintained throughout the submersion period, in no group did submersion <italic>per se</italic> significantly affect [Osm] (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.54) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-7-2">
<title>3.7.2 Acid-Base Balance</title>
<p>Arterialized blood pH and [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] of all three RH groups were significantly different across time submerged in water (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). However, there were no significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.36) between the responses of the RH groups at any point during submersion with no significant interaction between effects of RH and submersion time (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.86). All three RH groups initially showed an immediate mixed metabolic and respiratory acidosis at 2h, with blood PCO<sub>2</sub> before submersion (35 &#xb1; 1) rising significantly by &#x223c;30&#xa0;mmHg&#x2013;68 &#xb1; 3&#xa0;mmHg. Concurrently, the pH before submersion, (7.58 &#xb1; 0.2), fell &#x223c;0.3 units to 7.28 &#xb1; 0.1&#xa0;at 2&#xa0;h. However, from 2 to 24&#xa0;h there was a partial compensation of the metabolic and respiratory acidosis, with PCO<sub>2</sub> declining significantly from its peak by &#x223c;10&#xa0;mmHg&#x2013;56 &#xb1; 2&#xa0;mmHg over this period and pH rising by &#x223c;0.15&#xa0;mmHg&#x2013;7.42 &#xb1; 0.1.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Blood acid-base balance changes during the course of 24&#xa0;h partial water submersion at d17 of incubation. <bold>(A)</bold> Control, <bold>(B)</bold> Low and <bold>(C)</bold> High humidity. Means &#xb1; standard error are presented in this Davenport Diagram. N values are indicated in parentheses. Measurements were made at 0, 2, 6, and 24&#xa0;h following partial water submersion. Arrows indicate direction of change in mean values during the course of submersion. Both pH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) were significantly affected by partial water submergence in all three RH groups. However, there was no significant effect of incubation RH on either blood pH (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.762) or [HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.359), and there was no significant interaction between RH and submersion hour (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.87). n values indicated in parentheses.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-13-880737-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Hatchability</title>
<p>The hatching success of eggs incubated in commercial incubators is determined, in part, by incubator relative humidity. The relationship between embryo mortality and RH has been empirically determined and used to generate a bimodal curve (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ar and Rahn, 1980</xref>). In the literature on chicken egg incubation, effects of incubation RH on hatchability vary somewhat. For example, in several studies the RH for optimum hatchability ranged from &#x223c;40 to 65%, maximum hatchability occurred at 50% RH, and hatchability was decreased at &#x223c;35&#x2013;20% RH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Robertson I. S., 1961</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Snyder and Birchard, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tullet and Burton, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">van der Pol et al., 2013</xref>). In contrast, there were no differences in hatchability among eggs incubated at &#x223c;40&#x2013;70% RH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Buhr, 1995</xref>) and, similarly, in our study mean hatchability was unaffected by Low or High RH. There are clear physiological differences between different strains of chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Flores-Santin and Burggren, 2021</xref>) and these differences may extend back to the embryo, perhaps accounting for hatching variability in different relative humidities. Further experiments are required to determine the mechanisms underlying humidity-affected hatchling success.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 Body Mass</title>
<p>Although RH did not affect hatchability in the current experiment, hatchling body mass was altered, with body mass increasing in proportion to incubation RH. Again, results of RH differences in the literature are variable. There was no effect of RH on wet body mass of hatchlings hatched from eggs incubated at 40 and 70% RH and wet body mass at hatch was not different between Control and 85&#x2013;90% RH groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Robertson I. S., 1961</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Davis et al., 1988</xref>). Wet body mass at hatch decreased in eggs incubated at 20 and 33% RH and increased with increasing RH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tullet and Burton, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Peebles et al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hamdy et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bruzual et al., 2000</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bruzual et al. (2000)</xref> reported that wet body mass at hatch increased significantly with increasing RH treatment, but BM at pull (removal from machine) was not different. That result resembles as our observations. Dry body mass was unaffected by RH in the current study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>) as well as that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tullet and Burton (1982)</xref>. Collectively, these data suggest that variation in wet body mass under different conditions results from hydration/dehydration of the embryos, rather than actual changes in growth.</p>
<p>Since dry body mass of embryos was not different between the three groups with larger body water content in Control and High RH groups compared with Low RH group, embryos in Control and High RH groups are assumed to be becoming hydrated late in incubation toward hatching.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 Blood Variables</title>
<p>Blood Osm reflected tissue water content as influenced by incubation RH, as expected, with blood Osm being &#x223c;4% higher in Low RH compared to High RH groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). Similarly, lactate concentration was different between RH groups at different points in development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). Increased blood [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] has traditionally been viewed to be the result of stress, particularly if aerobic metabolism is affected, although increasingly lactate is viewed as an intermediary in aerobic metabolism, as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Brooks, 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2020</xref>). In the present study, the highest lactate levels were found in the High RH group later in development. Since blood Po<sub>2</sub> was unaffected by RH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>), it is unlikely that changes in glycolysis under different incubation RHs was contributing to any changes in [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>]. Noteworthy is that no consistent patterns emerged during incubation and even the largest [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] differences were only in the order of 50&#x2013;70%, compared to as much as 16-fold increases that can occur in chicken embryos when experiencing hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Tazawa et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Developmental changes in hematological respiratory variables in the developing chicken embryo have been reported in many studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Yosphe-Purer et al., 1953</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barnes and Jensen, 1959</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Temple and Metcalfe, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">de W Erasmus et al., 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Tazawa, 1971</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Tazawa et al., 1971a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">1971b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tazawa, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Dzialowski et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Black and Burggren, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Khorrami et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bolin et al., 2017</xref>). Some studies and reviews summarizing several reports indicated that hematological variables plateaued towards the end of incubation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Johnston, 1955</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Macpherson and Deamer, 1964</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jalavisto et al., 1965</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Romanoff, 1967</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Tazawa, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Davis et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tazawa et al., 2011</xref>). Although the current study did not collect arterialized blood after d19, Hct, [RBC] and [Hb] reached maximal values on d16-17 with subsequent decreases on d18 of development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), rather than plateauing. This decrease is consistent with other studies showing a temporary decrease in red blood cells and related hematological variables prior to hatching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Clark, 1951</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bartels et al., 1966</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ackerman, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Freeman and Misson, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lemez, 1972</xref>). The reason for decreases of Hct, [RBC] and [Hb] remain to be studied.</p>
<p>There was no influence of incubation RH on hematological variables (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>
<bold>),</bold> on blood PO<sub>2</sub>, PCO<sub>2</sub> and acid-base balance variables (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>
<bold>).</bold> Gas diffusion conductance of the eggshell and shell membranes remains unchanged during the last half of incubation when the chorioallantoic membrane has fully developed, so arterialized blood Po<sub>2</sub> decreases and Pco<sub>2</sub> increases due to increasing metabolism of developing embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). Simultaneously, as dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> increases in blood with development of embryos, acid-base status of older embryos develops a respiratory acidosis relative to younger embryos (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). Yet, these significant developmental changes in blood gases and acid-base balance were completely unaffected by incubation RH, even as water content and body mass were greatly affected.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-4">
<title>4.4 Incubation RH and Regulation of Hematological and Acid-Base Balance</title>
<p>Partial water submersion of embryonated eggs is a useful tool for decreasing gas exchange through the eggshell, resulting in intrinsic O<sub>2</sub> deficiency (hypoxemia) and CO<sub>2</sub> accumulation (hypercapnia) in the embryo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andrewartha et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kohl et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Branum et al., 2016</xref>). In the current study, hypoxemia and hypercapnia induced swelling of the red blood cells as a result of hypoxemia and hypercapnia&#x2014;i.e. Hct and MCV both increased. The maximum change was typically reached at 6&#xa0;h of submergence, with no further change through to 24&#xa0;h of submergence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Interestingly, no hematological variables at the 6&#xa0;h point of submersion differed between the Control and Low RH groups. Notably, however, the High RH group at 6&#xa0;h and especially at 24&#xa0;h had a significantly lower Hct, lower [Hb], lower [RBC] compared with the Control and Low RH groups, which still showed a greater disruption caused by hypoxemia and hypercapnia. That is, the High RH group at 6 and especially 24&#xa0;h showed the smallest deviation from pre-submergence values of all hematological variables (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Thus, we posit that the additional tissue water content associated with High RH incubation provides some degree of protection against hematological disturbance induced by submergence-related intrinsic hypoxemia and hypercapnia. Identification of the mechanism affording this red blood cell protection awaits further experimentation.</p>
<p>The initial development of large mixed metabolic and respiratory acidosis of the blood upon partial water submergence was unaffected by incubation RH, and was reflected by the very large and immediate increase in blood [La<sup>&#x2212;</sup>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). Similarly, the partial recovery through primarily metabolic mechanisms after 2&#xa0;h of submergence developed to the same extent in all three RH groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). These data suggest that the regulatory capability to at least partially restore blood acid-base balance exists independently of the severe disturbances to tissue water content caused by incubation in High or Low RH. To what extent other physiological systems&#x2014;e.g., renal, cardiovascular&#x2014;retain the ability to carry out their physiological functions awaits additional experimentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-5">
<title>4.5 Implications of Non-Ideal Incubation Humidity</title>
<p>This study has revealed that chronic relative humidities above or below optimum can to some extent influence both morphological and physiological factors at the time of hatching. Several questions arise: Do hatchlings showing alterations at birth as a result of incubation in non-ideal humidity subsequently &#x2018;grow out of&#x2019; these modifications into adulthood, or are they retained as life-long effects? Do hatchlings with normal morphological and physiological variables despite Low and High RH-incubation actually develop abnormalities during subsequent development to adulthood? While entirely speculative could there be effects of RH incubation that, through epigenetic inheritance, carry over into the offspring of chickens incubated in non-ideal conditions? Certainly, in the King quail (<italic>Coturnix chinensis</italic>) there can be transgenerational effects of pollutant exposure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bautista et al., 2021</xref>). Could this also be the case for RH-induced changes on the embryo? Finally, could different breeds of chicken have different response to incubation RH, and might they thus be better adapted to low or high humidity climates? Answering these and other questions warrants additional study in chickens and other birds.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, University of North Texas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>SB; Conceptualization; Experiments, Analysis, Manuscript Preparation. HT; Experiments, Analysis, Manuscript Preparation, Figure Preparation; WB, Conceptualization, Manuscript Preparation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Partial funding was provided to WB by US National Science Foundation Grant IOS 2103499.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We thank Maria Rojas for providing technical assistance.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ackerman</surname>
<given-names>N. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>The Physiological Effects of Hypoxia on the Erythrocytes of the Chick Embryo</article-title>. <source>Dev. Biol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>310</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0012-1606(70)90101-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Andrewartha</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Acute Regulation of Hematocrit and Acid-Base Balance in Chicken Embryos in Response to Severe Intrinsic Hypercapnic Hypoxia</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiology Neurobiol.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resp.2014.01.019</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahn</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Water in the Avian Egg Overall Budget of Incubation</article-title>. <source>Am. Zool.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>384</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icb/20.2.373</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barnes</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jensen</surname>
<given-names>W. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1959</year>). <article-title>Blood Volume and Red Cell Concentration in the Normal Chick Embryo</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Legacy Content</source> <volume>197</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>405</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.2.403</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bartels</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiller</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reinhardt</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>Oxygen Affinity of Chicken Blood before and after Hatching</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiol.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>345</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>356</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0034-5687(66)90001-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bautista</surname>
<given-names>N. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>do Amaral-Silva</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dzialowski</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Dietary Exposure to Low Levels of Crude Oil Affects Physiological and Morphological Phenotype in Adults and Their Eggs and Hatchlings of the King Quail (<italic>Coturnix chinensis</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Front. Physiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>661943</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2021.661943</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Black</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Acclimation to Hypothermic Incubation in Developing Chicken embryos(<italic>Gallus domesticus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Biol.</source> <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>1553</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1561</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.00910</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bolin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubansky</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Incubation Relative Humidity Induces Renal Morphological and Physiological Remodeling in the Embryo of the Chicken (<italic>Gallus gallus Domesticus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Comp. Biochem. Physiology Part A Mol. Integr. Physiology</source> <volume>204</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.11.016</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Branum</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic Developmental Plasticity Induced by Preincubation Egg Storage in Chicken Embryos (<italic>Gallus gallus Domesticus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Rep.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>e12712</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14814/phy2.12712</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brooks</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Lactate as a Fulcrum of Metabolism</article-title>. <source>Redox Biol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>101454</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.redox.2020.101454</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brooks</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The Science and Translation of Lactate Shuttle Theory</article-title>. <source>Cell. Metab.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>757</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>785</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.008</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bruzual</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peak</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brake</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peebles</surname>
<given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effects of Relative Humidity during Incubation on Hatchability and Body Weight of Broiler Chicks from Young Breeder Flocks</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>830</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ps/79.6.827</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buhr</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Incubation Relative Humidity Effects on Allantoic Fluid Volume and Hatchability</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>874</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>884</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.0740874</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrewartha</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Interactions of Acid-Base Balance and Hematocrit Regulation during Environmental Respiratory Gas Challenges in Developing Chicken Embryos (Gallus gallus)</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiology Neurobiol.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>148</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resp.2012.06.011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1951</year>). <article-title>Carbonic Anhydrase Activity during Embryonic Development</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Biol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>343</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.28.3.332</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ackerman</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Embryonic Osmoregulation: Consequences of High and Low Water Loss during Incubation of the Chicken Egg</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Zool.</source> <volume>245</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jez.1402450205</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de W. Erasmus</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J. Howell</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahn</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>/71). <article-title>Ontogeny of Acid-Base Balance in the Bullfrog and Chicken</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0034-5687(70)90101-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dzialowski</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>von Plettenberg</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elmonoufy</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Chronic Hypoxia Alters the Physiological and Morphological Trajectories of Developing Chicken Embryos</article-title>. <source>Comp. Biochem. Physiology Part A Mol. Integr. Physiology</source> <volume>131</volume>, <fpage>713</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>724</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00009-0</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Flores-Santin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Beyond the Chicken: Alternative Avian Models for Developmental Physiological Research</article-title>. <source>Front. Physiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>712633</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2021.712633</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Freeman</surname>
<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Misson</surname>
<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>pH, pO2 and pCO2 of Blood from the Foetus and Neonate of <italic>Gallus domesticus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Comp. Biochem. Physiology</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>763</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>772</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0010-406x(70)90025-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamdy</surname>
<given-names>A. M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van der Hel</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henken</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galal</surname>
<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abd-Elmoty</surname>
<given-names>A. K. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Effects of Air Humidity during Incubation and Age after Hatch on Heat Tolerance of Neonatal Male and Female Chicks</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1506</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.0701499</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jalavisto</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuorinka</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kyll&#xe4;stinen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Responsiveness of the Erythron to Variations of Oxygen Tension in the Chick Embryo and Young Chicken</article-title>. <source>Acta Physiol. Scand.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>486</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04092.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1955</year>). <article-title>Hematocrit Values for the Chick Embryo at Various Ages</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Legacy Content</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>362</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajplegacy.1955.180.2.361</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khorrami</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>`Blood-doping&#x27; Effects on Hematocrit Regulation and Oxygen Consumption in Late-Stage Chicken Embryos (Gallus gallus)</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Biol.</source> <volume>211</volume>, <fpage>883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>889</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.014068</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kohl</surname>
<given-names>Z. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crossley</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
<suffix>II</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of Blood Viscosity Regulation during Hypoxic Challenges in the Chicken Embryo (Gallus gallus Domesticus)</article-title>. <source>Comp. Biochem. Physiology Part A Mol. Integr. Physiology</source> <volume>190</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.07.023</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lemez</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>Thrombocytes of Chick Embryos from the 2nd Day of Incubation till the 1st Postembryonic Day</article-title>. <source>Acta Univ. Carol. Med. Monogr.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>371</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Macpherson</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deamer</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>Some Observations on Normal Erythrocyte Development in the Chick Embryo</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1594</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.0431587</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Noiva</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menezes</surname>
<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peleteiro</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Influence of Temperature and Humidity Manipulation on Chicken Embryonic Development</article-title>. <source>BMC Vet. Res.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>234</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12917-014-0234-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peebles</surname>
<given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brake</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gildersleeve</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Effects of Eggshell Cuticle Removal and Incubation Humidity on Embryonic Development and Hatchability of Broilers</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>834</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>840</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.0660834</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1961b</year>). <article-title>Studies in the Effect of Humidity on the Hatchability of Hen&#x2019;s Eggs. II. A Comparison of Hatchability, Weight Loss and Embryonic Growth in Eggs Incubated at 40 and 70% RH</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1961a</year>). <article-title>Studies on the Effect of Humidity on the Hatchability of Hen&#x27;s Eggs I. The Determination of Optimum Humidity for Incubation</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0021859600047663</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Romanoff</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1967</year>). <source>Biochemistry of the Avian Embryo</source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &#x26; Sons</publisher-name>, <fpage>136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Severinghaus</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stupfel</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradley</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1956a</year>). <article-title>Accuracy of Blood Ph and Pco2 Determinations</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Physiology</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jappl.1956.9.2.189</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Severinghaus</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stupfel</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradley</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1956b</year>). <article-title>Variations of Serum Carbonic Acid Pk&#x27; with Ph and Temperature</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Physiology</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jappl.1956.9.2.197</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Snyder</surname>
<given-names>G. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Birchard</surname>
<given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Water Loss and Survival in Embryos of the Domestic Chicken</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Zool.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jez.1402190115</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>Measurement of Respiratory Parameters in Blood of Chicken Embryo</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Physiol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jappl.1971.30.1.17</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrewartha</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Acute Regulation of Hematocrit and Blood Acid-Base Balance during Severe Hypoxic Challenges in Late Chicken Embryos (<italic>Gallus gallus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiology Neurobiol.</source> <volume>184</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resp.2012.08.002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrewartha</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burggren</surname>
<given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Development of Hematological Respiratory Variables in Late Chicken Embryos: The Relative Importance of Incubation Time and Embryo Mass</article-title>. <source>Comp. Biochem. Physiology Part A Mol. Integr. Physiology</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>233</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.02.024</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Carbon Dioxide Transport and Acid-Base Balance in Chickens before and after Hatching</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Respiration and Metabolism of Embryonic Vertebrates</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Seymour</surname>
<given-names>R.S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Dr W. Junk Publishers</publisher-name>), <fpage>331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-009-6536-2_24</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mikami</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshimoto</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1971b</year>). <article-title>Effect of Reducing the Shell Area on the Respiratory Properties of Chicken Embryonic Blood</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>352</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0034-5687(71)90039-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mikami</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshimoto</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1971a</year>). <article-title>Respiratory Properties of Chicken Embryonic Blood during Development</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0034-5687(71)90087-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tazawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Oxygen and CO2Exchange and Acid-Base Regulation in the Avian Embryo</article-title>. <source>Am. Zool.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>395</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>404</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icb/20.2.395</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Temple</surname>
<given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Metcalfe</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>The Effects of Increased Incubator Oxygen Tension on Capillary Development in the Chick Chorioallantois</article-title>. <source>Respir. Physiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>216</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>233</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0034-5687(70)90072-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tullett</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burton</surname>
<given-names>F. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Factors Affecting the Weight and Water Status of the Chick at Hatch</article-title>. <source>Br. Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00071688208447969</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van der Pol</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Roovert-Reijrink</surname>
<given-names>I. A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maatjens</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van den Brand</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molenaar</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of Relative Humidity during Incubation at a Set Eggshell Temperature and Brooding Temperature Posthatch on Embryonic Mortality and Chick Quality</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>2145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2155</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2013-03006</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yosphe-Purer</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fendrich</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1953</year>). <article-title>Estimation of the Blood Volumes of Embryonated Hen Eggs at Different Ages</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Legacy Content</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.175.2.178</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>