<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00668</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Limited DNA methylation variation and the transcription of <italic>MET1</italic> and <italic>DDM1</italic> in the genus <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> (Asteraceae): following the track of polyploidy</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Haibin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/186020"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Xiangyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Sumei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>Weimin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Zhiyong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Teng</surname> <given-names>Nianjun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Yuan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Jiafu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Fadi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University</institution> <country>Nanjing, China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Jiangsu Province Engineering Lab for Modern Facility Agriculture Technology and Equipment</institution> <country>Nanjing, China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: <italic>Thomas Debener, Leibniz University Hannover, Germany</italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: <italic>Marcus Linde, Leibniz Universit&#x00E4;t Hannover, Germany; Cai-Zhong Jiang, United States Department of Agriculture &#x2013; Agricultural Research Service, USA</italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x002A;Correspondence: <italic>Fadi Chen and Jiafu Jiang, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China, <email>chenfd@njau.edu.cn</email>; <email>jiangjiafu@njau.edu.cn</email></italic></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Crop Science and Horticulture, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2015</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>668</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>31</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2015</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2015</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2015 Wang, Qi, Chen, Fang, Guan, Teng, Liao, Jiang and Chen.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Qi, Chen, Fang, Guan, Teng, Liao, Jiang and Chen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Polyploidy has been recognized as a widespread and common phenomenon among flowering plants. DNA-5&#x2032;-CCGG site cytosine methylation (<italic>C</italic>-methylation) is one of the major and immediate epigenetic responses of the plant genome. Elucidating the ways in which altered <italic>C</italic>-methylation patterns, either at the whole genomic level or at specific sites can affect genome stability in polyploidy will require substantial additional investigation. Methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism profiling was used to evaluate variation in <italic>C</italic>-methylation among a set of 20 <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> species and their close relatives of varying ploidy levels from diploid to decaploid. The range in relative <italic>C</italic>-methylation level was within 10%, and there was no significant difference neither between different ploidy levels nor between different species in the same ploidy level (<italic>U</italic>-values &#x003C; 1.96). The transcript abundances of <italic>MET1</italic> and <italic>DDM1</italic> genes, which both involved in the regulation of <italic>C</italic>-methylation at CpG sites, were enhanced with increased ploidy level, but only <italic>MET1</italic> was positively correlated with the nuclear DNA content. Considering the key role and efficiency of MET1 in maintaining CpG methylation, the limited variation observed with respect to <italic>C</italic>-methylation may reflect a balance between the increased activity of <italic>MET1</italic> in the higher ploidy genomes and the larger number of CpG dinucleotide sites available for methylation.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>DNA methylation</kwd>
<kwd><italic>MET1</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>DDM1</italic></kwd>
<kwd>polyploid</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Chrysanthemum</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="67"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Polyploidy is widely recognized as a significant driver of higher plant evolution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen, 2007</xref>). The majority of extant angiosperm species have undergone at least one whole genome duplication (WGD) event to form either an auto- or an allopolyploid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jiao et al., 2011</xref>). Polyploidization induces changes in both the genome sequence and the transcriptome. At least some of the latter are induced by alterations in cytosine (C-) methylation (DNA-5&#x2032;-CCGG sites; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Salmon et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Parisod et al., 2010</xref>), a process which underlies much of the epigenetic variation in eukaryotic genomes. Actively transcribed sequences tend to be less heavily methylated than non-active ones, especially in their promoter region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chan et al., 2005</xref>). The phenotypic consequences of altered <italic>C</italic>-methylation patterns can also give rise to evolutionary opportunities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Rangwala and Richards, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rapp and Wendel, 2005</xref>), particularly in the context of polyploidization events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen and Ni, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen, 2007</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>C</italic>-methylation in higher plant genomes is concentrated within CpG dinucleotides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lister et al., 2008</xref>), and is strongly influenced by the activity of <italic>MET1</italic>, a gene encoding a DNA cytosine-5-methyltransferase, since the suppression of this gene results in a reduction in global <italic>C</italic>-methylation, particularly at CpG sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Saze et al., 2003</xref>). A second important gene in this context is <italic>DDM1</italic> (decrease in DNA methylation), which encodes a likely SNF2/SWI2 class chromatin remodeling protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jeddeloh et al., 1999</xref>). The functions of DDM1 and MET1 are both involved in the regulation of <italic>C</italic>-methylation at CpG sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>The direct detection of <italic>C</italic>-methylation requires a modified form of sequencing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Martienssen and Colot, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Riddle and Richards, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Leitch and Leitch, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Koh et al., 2010</xref>), but an indirect and more convenient means is provided by the MSAP (methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism) technique, which exploits the differential sensitivity shown by certain pairs of isoschizomeric restriction enzymes (REs) to <italic>C</italic>-methylation in their recognition site (DNA-5&#x2032;-CCGG). MSAP based on the enzyme pair <italic>Hpa</italic>II and <italic>Msp</italic>I discriminates between hemi- (<sup>m</sup>CCGG) and fully methylated (C<sup>m</sup>CGG) sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">McClelland et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sha et al., 2005</xref>), and has been used to explore the variation in DNA methylation in a number of plant species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Zhao et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Wang et al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2014b</xref>), as well as to demonstrate <italic>C</italic>-methylation induced by polyploidization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Shaked et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Qi et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The Asteraceae genus <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> includes several polyploid species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Wang et al., 2013b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2014c</xref>). Considerable variation at the ploidy level is present in this genus (from 2n = 2x = 18, to 2n = 36, 54, 72, up to 90; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al., 2012</xref>). In previous studies, we investigated the genomic and epigenomic alterations during intergeneric hybridization in <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> sp. using MSAP method. Surprisingly, in genus <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic>, the global DNA methylation concentration in the diploids (51.9&#x2013;53.1%) was not much lower than that in the decaploid (55.4%; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wang et al., 2013a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2014a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">b</xref>). The aim of the present study was to characterize species-to-species variation for <italic>C</italic>-methylation in this genus, based on MSAP profiling. In addition, given the key role of MET1 and DDM1 in maintaining CpG methylation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et al., 2010</xref>), an analysis of their transcript abundance was undertaken in <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> species varying in ploidy level from diploid to decaploid.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Plant Material and DNA Extraction</title>
<p>The plants sampled for DNA analysis have been maintained by vegetative reproduction for at least 8 years under a constant environment (22&#x00B0;C during the day, a minimum at 15&#x00B0;C at night, a relative humidity of 70&#x2013;75% and under natural light) at the Chrysanthemum Germplasm Resource Preserving Centre, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. The diploids selected were <italic>Chrysanthemum nankingense, C. dichrum, C. japonicum, C. boreale, C. lavandulifolium</italic>, and <italic>Tanacetum vulgare;</italic> the tetraploids were <italic>C. indicum, C. yoshinaganthum, C. okiense, C. japonicum</italic> var. <italic>wakasaense</italic> and <italic>C. chanetii</italic>; the hexaploids were <italic>C. vestitum, C. morifolium, C. japonense</italic>, and <italic>C. zawadskii</italic>; the octoploids were <italic>C. ornatum, Ajania shiwogiku</italic>, and <italic>A. &#x00D7; marginatum</italic>; and the decaploids were <italic>C. crassum</italic> and <italic>A. pacificum</italic> (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref></bold>). Their DNA was extracted from fully expanded fourth and fifth leaves harvested from three plants per species, using a modified CTAB method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Stewart and Via, 1993</xref>). DNA integrity was confirmed by running a 2% agarose gel. The concentration and purity of the DNA preparations were monitored using the Nano-Drop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nano-Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), and preparations were stored at -20&#x00B0;C for subsequent analysis.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Taxa used as plant materials and their ploidy level.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Taxa</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Ploidy</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Chrysanthemum boreale</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Watanabe (1983)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. dichrum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonicum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abd El-Twab and Kondo (2006)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bao et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. lavandulifolium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. nankingense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wang et al. (2013a)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Tanacetum vulgare</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Tang et al. (2011)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wang et al. (2013a)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. chanetii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abd E-Twab and Kondo (2007)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. indicum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tang et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonicum</italic> var. <italic>wakasaense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bao et al. (2012)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. okiense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Uehara et al. (2012)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. yoshinaganthum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Abd El-Twab and Kondo (2012)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Watanabe (1983)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. morifolium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. vestitum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. zawadskii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhao et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ajania &#x00D7; marginatum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chen et al. (2008)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. shiwogiku</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Uehara et al. (2012)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. ornatum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Watanabe (1981)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et al. (2014c)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. crassum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Tang et al. (2009)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wang et al. (2013a)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. pacificum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Uehara et al. (2012)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Zhao et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>MSAP Profiling</title>
<p>The interpretation of MSAP data is predominantly based on known RE activities at recognition sequences modified by methylation. Data concerning the methylation sensitivity of REs and corresponding literature can be found at the website of The Restriction Enzyme Database (REBASE<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01">1</xref></sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fulne&#x010D;ek and Kova&#x0159;&#x00ED;k, 2014</xref>). The MSAP profiling procedure was based on the protocol given in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Reyna-Lopez et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Xiong et al., 1999</xref>). About 500 ng DNA per entry was double-digested at 37&#x00B0;C for 12 h in parallel with either 10 U <italic>Eco</italic>RI (New England Biolabs, China, EC 3.1.23.13) and 20 U <italic>Hpa</italic>II (NEB, EC 3.1.23.24), or 10 U <italic>Eco</italic>RI, and 10 U <italic>Msp</italic>I (NEB, EC 3.1.23.24). The products were ligated with 5 pmol <italic>Eco</italic>RI adaptor and 50 pmol <italic>Hpa</italic>II-<italic>Msp</italic>I adaptor (sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">S1</xref>) in a reaction containing 4 U T4 DNA ligase held at 16&#x00B0;C for 4 h, after which the ligation reaction was heat-inactivated (65&#x00B0;C, 10 min). A 5 &#x03BC;L aliquot of the product was pre-amplified in the presence of 0.2 &#x03BC;M <italic>Eco</italic>RI and 0.2 &#x03BC;M <italic>Hpa</italic>II-<italic>Msp</italic>I non-selective primers (sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">S1</xref>) in a 25 &#x03BC;L reaction containing 2.5 &#x03BC;L 10x PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.2 mM dNTP, and 2 U <italic>Taq</italic> polymerase (Takara, Japan). The reactions were first denatured (94&#x00B0;C/3 min), then subjected to 24 cycles of 94&#x00B0;C/30 s, 56&#x00B0;C/60 s, 72&#x00B0;C/60 s, after which a final extension step (72&#x00B0;C/10 min) was given (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Xiong et al., 1999</xref>). The pre-amplification product was diluted 1:29 in ddH<sub>2</sub>O to provide the template for the subsequent selective PCR, which included a fluorescently-labeled <italic>Eco</italic>RI primer and a non-labeled <italic>Hpa</italic>II-<italic>Msp</italic>I selective (three selective bases) primer. Primer sequences are given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM5">S1</xref>. The set of primer combinations (PCs) used were <italic>Eco</italic>RI selective primer #2 combined with <italic>Hpa</italic>II/<italic>Msp</italic>I selective primer #5 (abbreviated E2 + HM5), E2 + HM7, E3 + HM3, E4 + HM3, E4 + HM7, E4 + HM8, E6 + HM6, E6 + HM8, E7 + HM1, E7 + HM3, E8 + HM2, and E8 + HM8, and the remaining constituents of the reaction were identical to those used for the pre-amplification reaction. The reactions were first denatured (95&#x00B0;C/3 min), then subjected to 13 cycles of 94&#x00B0;C/30 s, 65&#x00B0;C/30 s (reduced by 0.7&#x00B0;C per cycle per cycles), 72&#x00B0;C/30 s, then to 25 cycles of 94&#x00B0;C/30 s, 55&#x00B0;C/30 s, 72&#x00B0;C/ 30 s, and finished by a final extension step of 72&#x00B0;C/7 min. The reaction products were denaturized by heating at 98&#x00B0;C for 3 min followed by cooling on ice and separated using an ABI3730xl (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) device, following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Individual fragment sizes were estimated from the migration of the GeneScan LIZ500 size standards, as determined by GeneMapper<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> v3.7 software (Applied Biosystems). Fragments in the size range 120&#x2013;480 bp were scored. Two replicate reactions per entry were run, and only reproducible fragments were retained. The statistical test used to interpret variation in MSAP fingerprint followed the suggestion made in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wang et al., 2013a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2014a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">b</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>;</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x2003;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>;</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>&#x03B4;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>n</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>;</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x2003;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>U</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>&#x03B4;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathsize='12pt'>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathsize='12pt'>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathsize='12pt'>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Where, n1 represents the total sites for a given sample; n2 represents the total sites the mid-values; y1 represents the total DNA methylation sites, hemimethylation sites or fully methylation sites for a given sample, y2 represents the total DNA methylation sites, hemimethylation sites, or fully methylation sites of the mid-values. <italic>p</italic>1 is the percentage of total methylation sites, hemimethylation sites or fully methylation sites for a given sample; <italic>p</italic>2 is the percentage of total methylation sites, hemimethylation sites or fully methylation sites of the mid-values. The Pearson&#x2019;s <italic>R</italic><sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn02">2</xref></sup> coefficient between the ploidy level and relative <italic>C</italic>-methylation were evaluated using SPSS v19 software.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>The Isolation of CnMET1 and CnDDM1 and Measurement of Transcript Abundance</title>
<p>Total RNA Isolation System (Takara) was used to isolate RNA from fully expanded <italic>C. nankingense</italic> leaves, following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. A 1 &#x03BC;L aliquot of the resulting RNA (containing about 600 ng) provided the template for the synthesis of the first cDNA strand by SuperScriptIII Reverse Transcriptase (Takara) with random hexamer primers. The subsequent PCR used two degenerate primer pairs (DP1/DP2 and DP3/DP4: sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>) which targeted <italic>MET1</italic>, designed from an alignment of the MET polypeptides of <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> (XP_003619753.1), <italic>Hieracium pilosella</italic> (ACX83570.1), <italic>Nicotiana tabacum</italic> (BAF36443.1), <italic>Prunus persica</italic> (AAM96952.1), <italic>Elaeis guineensis</italic> (ABW96888.1), and <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (NP_199727.1). To obtain the full length cDNA prior to a RACE PCR, the sequences were first validated by amplification with a pair of gene-specific primers (SP-F/SP-R: sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>; <bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref></bold>). For the 3&#x2032; RACE, the first cDNA strand was synthesized using an oligo (dT) primer incorporating the sequence of the adaptor primer, followed by a nested PCR using the gene-specific primer pair GSP3-1/3-2/3-3 and the adaptor primer (sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>). For the 5&#x2032; RACE, the nested PCR used the 5&#x2032; RACE adaptor primer (Abridged Anchor Primer, AAP), the Abridged Universal Amplification Primer (AUAP) provided with the 5&#x2032; RACE System kit v2.0 (Takara) and the internal gene-specific primer pair (GSP5-1/5-2/5-3, sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>). The gene&#x2019;s open reading frame (ORF) was identified using <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html">www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html</ext-link> and amplified using primers Full-F/Full-R (sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>). A multiple sequence alignment of the predicted gene product with homologs present in <italic>M. truncatula, H. pilosella, N. tabacum, P. persica, E. guineensis, A. thaliana, Daucus carota</italic> (AAC39355.1), <italic>H. piloselloides</italic> (ACX83569.1), <italic>N. sylvestris</italic> (CAQ18900.1), <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> (BAG15930.1), <italic>Pisum sativum</italic> (AAC49931.1), <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> (XP_002305346.1), <italic>Ricinus communis</italic> (XP_002518029.1), <italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> (NP_001234748.1), and <italic>Zea mays</italic> (NP_001105186.1) was carried out using DNAMAN software v5.2.2 (Lynnon Biosoft, Canada), and a subsequent phylogenetic analysis was carried out using MEGA 5.0 software<sup>2</sup>. The same strategy was applied for the isolation of <italic>CnDDM1</italic> (primer sequences given in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>).</p>
<p>Transcription profiling of <italic>MET1</italic> and <italic>DDM1</italic> was based on RNA extracted from fully expanded fourth and the fifth leaves of <italic>C. nankingense</italic> (2x), <italic>C. indicum</italic> (4x), <italic>C. morifolium</italic> (6x), <italic>C. ornatum</italic> (8x), and <italic>C. crassum</italic> (10x) which are species that were intensively investigated in the previous studies. Prior to its reverse transcription, 30 ng RNA was treated with 10 U of RNase-free DNaseI (Takara) at 37&#x00B0;C for 30 min to remove any contaminating genomic DNA. The first cDNA strand was synthesized by SuperScriptIII Reverse Transcriptase (Takara), according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTMII (Takara). The reactions were first denatured (95&#x00B0;C/2 min), then subjected to 40 cycles of 95&#x00B0;C/30 s, 55&#x00B0;C/30 s, 72&#x00B0;C/30 s. A previous study suggests that when making cross-species comparison of transcript abundance involving different ploidy levels, care needs to be taken in the selection of reference gene(s) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wang et al., 2014d</xref>), especially in <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> sp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wang et al., 2015</xref>). Here, <italic>EF1&#x03B1;</italic> (GenBank accession KF305681), <italic>TUB</italic> (KF305685), <italic>ACTIN</italic> (KF305683), and <italic>PP2A</italic> (KF305684) were used as candidate reference genes (Primer sequences were listed in Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM6">S2</xref>). The selection of a reference gene was based on geNORM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Vandesompele et al., 2002</xref>) and NormFinder (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Andersen et al., 2004</xref>) Software. The former calculates a stability value (<italic>M</italic>) for each gene, with a lowest <italic>M</italic>-value being taken as an indicator of stable transcription. The latter provides a direct measure of the variation using an ANOVA-based model and ranks the candidate genes accordingly. The data were shown as mean &#x00B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = three biological replicates). Each qRT-PCR amplicon was cloned using a PMD19 TA cloning kit (Takara) and sequenced for verification.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Flow Cytometric Acquisition of Nuclear DNA Content</title>
<p>Flow cytometry was used to determine the relative nuclear DNA contents of <italic>C. nankingense, C. indicum, C. morifolium, C. ornatum</italic>, and <italic>C. crassum</italic>. A 200 mg sample of fresh leaf material (three biological replicates per species) was macerated in 2 mL 15 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 80 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 20 mM Na<sub>2</sub>EDTA, 2% (v/v) &#x03B2;-mercaptoethanol, 0.05% (v/v) Triton X-100 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Liu et al., 2011</xref>). The homogenate was passed through a 50 &#x03BC;m nylon mesh and centrifuged (1,500 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic>, 10 min, 4&#x00B0;C). Prior to flow cytometry, a 200 &#x03BC;L aliquot of 3 U &#x03BC;L<sup>-1</sup> RNAase, 50 &#x03BC;g mL<sup>-1</sup> presidiums iodide was added, and the reaction was kept in the dark at 4&#x00B0;C for 30 min. Flow cytometry was affected with a Coulter EpicsxL device (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). Nuclear DNA content was estimated with respect to that of the reference species <italic>C. nankingense</italic>. Each measurement was based on the mean of three technical replicates and only those associated with a coefficient of variation &#x003C;5% were accepted.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>MSAP Fingerprinting</title>
<p>The methylation status of each fragment (<bold>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A,B</xref></bold>, <bold>Supplementary Data <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">S1</xref></bold>) and the proportion of methylated fragments present in the 20 species is presented in <bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold>. <italic>A. pacificum</italic> (10x) had the highest proportion of methylated sites (59.2%), followed by <italic>C. ornatum</italic> (8x, 57.1%), <italic>A. shiwogiku</italic> (8x, 56.7%), <italic>A. &#x00D7; marginatum</italic> (8x, 56.6%) and <italic>C. japonense</italic> (6x, 55.6%). The lowest proportions were present in <italic>C. lavandulifolium</italic> (2x, 49.8%), <italic>T. vulgare</italic> (2x, 51.9%) and <italic>C. dichrum</italic> (2x, 52.2%). The range in relative <italic>C</italic>-methylation level was within 10%.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Representative fragments in methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) profiles <bold>(A,B)</bold> and the relationship between <italic>U-</italic>values and ploidy level (C&#x2013;E). (A)</bold> <italic>Hpa</italic> II and <italic>Msp</italic> I sensitivities to 5-CCGG methylation status (&#x201C;+&#x201D;: enzyme cuts; &#x201C;-&#x201D;: enzyme does not cut): three types of fragment generated. Type I: non-methylated, appearing in both the H and M lanes; Type II: fully methylated, present in the M but not the H lanes; Type III: hemi-methylated, present in the H but not the M lanes; <bold>(B)</bold> Examples of MSAP electrophoresis patterns in ABI3730xl; The relationship between <italic>U-</italic>values and ploidy level <bold>(C-E)</bold>. <italic>U-</italic>values associated with <bold>(C)</bold> total methylation, <bold>(D)</bold> full methylation, <bold>(E)</bold> hemi-methylation. A higher <italic>U</italic>-value implies a larger difference between different samples, but only <italic>U</italic>-values>1.96 were statistically significant.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-06-00668-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Variation in <italic>C</italic>-methylation status among the 20 species.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Taxa</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Ploidy</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Non-methylated sites</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Methylated sites<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="left">Total</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Fully methylated</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Hemi-methylated</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. boreale</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. dichrum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonicum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. lavandulifolium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">49.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. nankingense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">46.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">53.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>T. vulgare</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">48.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">51.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.0%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. chanetii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. indicum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.3%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonicum</italic> var. <italic>wakasaense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. okiense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. yoshinaganthum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">46.7%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">53.3%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. morifolium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">52.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.0%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. vestitum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. zawadskii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">45.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.0%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. &#x00D7; marginatum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">43.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">56.6%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. shiwogiku</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">43.3%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">56.7%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.4%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. ornatum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">42.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">57.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.0%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. crassum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.1%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. pacificum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">40.8%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">59.2%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.5%</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.8%</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Variation in Cytosine Methylation within a Given Ploidy Level</title>
<p>Based on the MSAP profiles, the numbers of non-methylated, hemi-methylated, and fully methylated CCGG sites derived from the MSAP profiles were used to calculate the relative methylation level of the six diploid species; this lay in the range 49.8&#x2013;54.6% (<italic>U</italic> = 0.11&#x2013;1.11, <italic>U</italic><sub>0.05</sub> = 1.96, a higher <italic>U</italic>-value implies a larger difference between different samples, but only <italic>U</italic>-values >1.96 were statistically significant), broken down into 25.4&#x2013;27.5% (<italic>U</italic> = 0.05&#x2013;0.68) fully methylated internal cytosines and 24.4&#x2013;27.1% (<italic>U</italic> = 0.02&#x2013;0.69) hemi-methylated external ones. None of the individual values departed statistically from the mid-value of the set of diploid species (<bold>Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold> and <bold><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><italic>U-</italic>values associated with species within a ploidy level.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Taxa</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Ploidy</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Total methylation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Fully-methylation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Hemi-methylation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. boreale</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. dichrum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonicum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. lavandulifolium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. nankingense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>T. vulgare</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. chanetii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.31</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. indicum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonicum</italic> var. <italic>wakasaense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. okiense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.02</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. yoshinaganthum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. japonense</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. morifolium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. vestitum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. zawadskii</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. &#x00D7; marginatum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. shiwogiku</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. ornatum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.13</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. crassum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>A. pacificum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10x</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>For the five tetraploid entries, the proportion of methylated fragments lay between 52.4 and 55.5%. <italic>C. indicum</italic> had the lowest proportion of both total methylated and fully methylated sites, while the lowest proportion of hemi-methylated sites was present in <italic>C. chanetii</italic>. The <italic>U</italic>-values ranged from 0.07 to 0.70 (total methylation), 0.11 to 1.07 (full methylation), and 0.02 to 0.31 (hemi-methylation), and none of the individual values differed significantly from one another (<bold>Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold> and <bold><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>).</p>
<p>Among the higher ploidy entries (6&#x2013;10x), the maximum <italic>U</italic>-values were 1.21 (total methylation), 1.62 (full methylation), and 0.95 (hemi-methylation); these values did not differ significantly from one another (<bold>Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold> and <bold><xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>). In each species, the hemi-methylated sites were less variable than the fully methylated ones, and the <italic>U-</italic>values associated with the fully methylated sites were greater than those of the hemi-methylated ones in 16 of the 20 species, however, none of these differences were statistically significant (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Variation in Cytosine Methylation Status Across Ploidy Levels</title>
<p>Correlation analysis yielded statistically correlations (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.27&#x2013;0.65) between the ploidy level and relative <italic>C</italic>-methylation. A highest correlation coefficient was obtained in total methylation, while the lowest <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> was obtained in fully methylation. However, with respect to total methylation level, the <italic>U</italic>-values ranged from 0.14 to 0.91, with the lowest values being associated with the 8 and 10x entries, and the highest with the 2 and 10x entries (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1C</xref></bold>). With respect to the fully methylated sites, the <italic>U</italic>-values ranged from 0.09 to 0.50, with the lowest associated with the 8 and 10x species and the highest distributed among the 2, 4, 6, and 10x ones (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1D</xref></bold>). For the hemi-methylated sites, the range in <italic>U</italic>-value was 0.06&#x2013;0.53, with the lowest recorded in the 8 and 10x species and the highest in the 2, 4, and 10x species (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1E</xref></bold>). Overall therefore there was no significant difference between ploidy level, either total, full or hemi-methylation levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Isolation of CnMET1 and CnDDM1 Gene and Analysis of its Transcription</title>
<p>The full length <italic>CnMET1</italic> (Genbank accession KF305682) cDNA was a 5,124 nt sequence, comprising a 4,803 nt ORF, a 92 nt 5&#x2032;-UTR and a 229 nt 3&#x2032;-UTR. The sequence showed significant homology to other plant <italic>MET</italic> genes. At the peptide level, the mean level of identity was 71.8%, reaching >80% in the most conserved regions (data not shown). A phylogenetic analysis showed that the most closely related sequences to <italic>CnMET1</italic> were the homologs from <italic>H. pilosella</italic> and <italic>H. piloselloides</italic> (both Asteraceae species); in the conserved regions of the gene, the level of sequence identity was >90% (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold>). The <italic>CnDDM1</italic> (Genbank KJ560359) sequence encodes a 752 residue product, sharing substantial homology with other plant <italic>DDM</italic> genes (data not shown). Its most closely related sequences were its homologs from <italic>Brassica rapa</italic> and <italic>A. thaliana</italic> (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold>) and the CnMET1/AtMET1 and CnDDM1/AtMET1 motifs lie parallel to one another and in the most conserved regions. The MET1 cytosine-C5 specific DNA methylase domain and the DDM1 N-terminal domain had an almost identical three-dimensional structure (Data not shown).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Phylogeny of MET and DDM1 proteins.</bold> <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> AtMET1 (NP_199727.1), <italic>Prunus persica</italic> PpMET (AAM96952.1), <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> MtMET (XP_003619753.1), <italic>Pisum sativum</italic> PsMET (AAC49931.1), <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> PtMET (XP_002305346.1), <italic>Ricinus communis</italic> RcMET (XP_002518029.1), <italic>Daucus carota</italic> DcMET1 (AAC39355.1), <italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic> SlMET (NP_001234748.1), <italic>Nicotiana sylvestris</italic> NsMET (CAQ18900.1), <italic>N. tabacum</italic> NtMET1 (BAF36443.1), <italic>Oryza sativa</italic> OsMET (BAG15930.1), <italic>Zea mays</italic> ZmMET1 (NP_001105186.1), <italic>Elaeis guineensis</italic> EgMET1 (ABW96888.1), <italic>Hieracium pilosella</italic> HpMET (ACX83570.1), <italic>H. piloselloides</italic> HpMET (ACX83569.1), <italic>Vitis vinifera</italic> VvDDM1 (XP_002267239.2), <italic>Glycine max</italic> GmDDM1(XP_003516571.1), <italic>S. lycopersicum</italic> SlDDM1 (XP_004232396.1), <italic>Crocus sativus</italic> CsDDM1 (XP_004149166.1), <italic>B. rapa</italic> BrDDM1 (BAG30707.1), <italic>Cicer arietinum</italic> CaDDM1 (XP_004512037.1), <italic>Fragaria vesca</italic> FvDDM1 (XP_004289144.1), <italic>O. sativa</italic> OsDDM1 (BAF34942.1), <italic>Setaria italica</italic> SiDDM1 (XP_004981943.1), <italic>Triticum urartu</italic> TuDDM1 (EMS59856.1), <italic>Brachypodium distachyon</italic> BdDDM1 (XP_003560489.1), <italic>Arabidopsis arenosa</italic> AaDDM1 (AAP92713.1), <italic>A. thaliana</italic> AtDDM1 (NP_201476.1).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-06-00668-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Relative to the nuclear DNA content of <italic>C. nankingense</italic>, that of <italic>C. indicum</italic> (4x) was 1.94-fold greater, that of <italic>C. morifolium</italic> (6x) 2.91-fold greater, that of <italic>C. ornatum</italic> (8x) 3.25-fold greater and that of <italic>C. crassum</italic> (10x) 4.25 greater (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref></bold>). The relationship between relative nuclear DNA content and ploidy level was not completely linear. This finding is not surprising given the accumulated data across angiosperms which indicate genome down-sizing (due to equilibration or/and deletion of DNA) following hybridization or/and polyploidization.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Nuclear DNA content obtained by flow cytometry and <italic>MET1</italic>/<italic>DDM1</italic> transcription analysis. (A)</bold> Nuclear DNA content of <italic>Chrysanthemum nankingense</italic> (2x), <italic>C. indicum</italic> (4x), <italic>C. morifolium</italic> (6x), <italic>Ajania shiwogiku</italic> (8x) and <italic>C. crassum</italic> (10x); <bold>(B)</bold> The Ct value and melting temperature of each reference genes; the X axis represents the PCR cycle number. The red line represents the threshold fluorescence at which the Ct was determined. None of the reference genes were uniformly transcribed (Ct) in five ploidy levels and species. Melting curve analyses showed that each primer pair amplified a single PCR product. <bold>(C)</bold> Model of reference gene(s) used in five ploidy levels and species; <bold>(D)</bold> Transcript abundance was correlated with ploidy level for both <italic>MET1</italic> and <italic>DDM1</italic>. <italic>PP2A</italic> was selected as inter-run calibrators (IRCs) for <italic>EF1</italic>&#x03B1;, <italic>TUB</italic>, and <italic>ACTIN</italic>, and the coefficient of variation (transcript abundance normalized using <italic>EF1</italic>&#x03B1;<sub>4x-6x</sub><italic>-TUB</italic><sub>6x-8x</sub><italic>-ACTIN</italic><sub>8x-10x</sub> vs. using <italic>PP2A</italic><sub>4x-8x-10x</sub>) &#x003C; 5%.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-06-00668-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Cross species comparison of gene expression can be taken with the right reference genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wang et al., 2014d</xref>). Across all templates, <italic>EF-1a</italic> was the most abundantly transcribed gene, accompanied by the lowest Ct (16.21&#x2013;17.88), followed by <italic>ACTIN</italic> (18.31&#x2013;20.25) and <italic>TUB</italic> (20.25&#x2013;21.89), while <italic>PP2A</italic> (25.49&#x2013;26.26) was the least abundantly transcribed gene (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref></bold>). Melting curve analyses showed that each primer pair amplified a single PCR product (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref></bold>). However, none of the reference genes were uniformly transcribed in five ploidy levels and species. Therefore, it was necessary to evaluate the reference genes for normalization in the tested samples. Here, two algorithms, geNorm and NormFinder, were used to determine which of the reference genes would be most suitable in each group. The results shown <italic>EF1&#x03B1;</italic>/<italic>TUBULIN</italic>/<italic>ACTIN</italic>/<italic>PP2A</italic> were predicted to deliver the most reliable level of normalization for 2x vs. 4x vs. 6x/6x vs. 8x/8x vs. 10x/4x vs. 8x vs. 10x ploidy (<bold>Supplementary Figure <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">S2</xref></bold>; <bold>Supplementary Data <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">S2</xref></bold>), as the model shown in <bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref></bold>.</p>
<p><italic>MET1</italic> was transcribed in all five species, and all the amplicon sequences recovered after qRT-PCR shared the same sequence (data not shown). However, there were substantial inter-specific differences in transcript abundance, in general increasing with the ploidy level. Thus, <italic>MET1</italic> transcript abundance in <italic>C. crassum</italic> (10x) was 1.23-fold that in <italic>C. ornatum</italic> (8x), 1.77-fold that in <italic>C. morifolium</italic> (6x), 2.11-fold that in <italic>C. indicum</italic> (4x) and 2.87-fold that in the <italic>C. nankingense</italic> (2x; <bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref></bold>). Similarly, for <italic>DDM1</italic>, the abundance of transcript in <italic>C. crassum, C. ornatum, C. morifolium</italic>, and <italic>C. indicum</italic> was, respectively, 6.19, 5.62, 3.88, and 1.60-fold that in <italic>C. nankingense</italic> (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref></bold>). The results showed that transcript abundance of two genes was increased with genome size, but only <italic>MET1</italic> positively correlated with the nuclear DNA content (<italic>r</italic> = 0.765, <italic>P</italic>= 0.001), while <italic>DDM1</italic> transcript abundance was not correlated (<italic>P</italic>> 0.005).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>The Asteraceae represent a relatively young family which has diversified substantially over the past 40 million years. At least three WGD events have occurred during the evolution of the family (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Barker et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Malinska et al., 2010</xref>), and many of its currently extant species are polyploid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Martin et al., 2011</xref>). The frequency of polyploidy in the <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> genus suggests that these species still retain the potential to evolve rapidly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Yang et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et al., 2012</xref>). MSAP is based on the AFLP technology and can be used effectively to detect polymorphism in DNA methylation patterns within and among different species with no requirement for prior genome information other than the approximate genome size. We therefore consider MSAP to be a suitable technique to evaluate epigenetic changes at the level of DNA methylation in present studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wang et al., 2013a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2014a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">b</xref>).</p>
<p>The MSAP profiles of the various <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> species and their close relatives have demonstrated numerous <italic>C</italic>-methylation polymorphisms. <italic>C</italic>-methylation in coding and promoter sequence can have a profound effect on a gene&#x2019;s expression, so some of these epigenetic polymorphisms may have an impact on the phenotype of plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Shaked et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Adams and Wendel, 2005</xref>). <italic>C</italic>-methylation levels and patterns were variable between species sharing the same ploidy level, although the extent of this variation was not that great. Although the extent of <italic>C</italic>-methylation suggested there were little correlations with ploidy level (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.27&#x2013;0.65), the range in relative <italic>C</italic>-methylation level was within 10% and there was no significant difference between ploidy level, either total, full, or hemi-methylation levels (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold>, <bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref></bold>), for example, in the 10<italic>x</italic> species <italic>C. crassum</italic>, 55.9% of the MSAP fragments were methylated, while in the 8<italic>x</italic> species <italic>C. ornatum</italic> the proportion was 57.1%, in the 6<italic>x</italic> species <italic>C. morifolium</italic> 52.5%, in the 4<italic>x</italic> species <italic>C. indicum</italic> 52.4%, and in the 2<italic>x</italic> species <italic>C. japonicum</italic> 54.6%. A similar result has been reported in a number of other genera, which the characteristics of DNA methylation in ployploid may be not consistent with ploidy level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Fortune et al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>The <italic>MET</italic> sequence is highly conserved across the spectrum from plants to mammals. Its preferred target in plant genomes is the CpG dinucleotide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lister et al., 2008</xref>). In <italic>A. thaliana</italic> at least, the MET1 enzyme acts to maintain the global level of <italic>C</italic>-methylation, since when suppressed via antisense technology, the global level of <italic>C</italic>-methylation, particularly at CpG sites, is strongly reduced, despite the presence of several other methyltransferase genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Robertson and Jones, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Steward et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kankel et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Takeda and Paszkowski, 2006</xref>). Here, the sequence of the <italic>Chrysanthemum MET1</italic> homolog is very similar to that of other <italic>MET</italic> genes, as would be expected if MET1 is a functional DNA methyltransferase (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold>). In contrast to the patterns of <italic>C</italic>-methylation in the <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> polyploids, <italic>MET1</italic> transcript abundance was positively correlated with genome size. MET1&#x2019;s primary function is to control <italic>C</italic>-methylation, a form of DNA modification which is necessary to maintain the integrity and stability of the genome. The simplest and most probable explanation for the increased transcript abundance of <italic>MET1</italic> in higher ploidy genomes, in which the level of <italic>C</italic>-methylation is not significantly different from that in low ploidy genomes, is that the quantity of DNA in a high ploidy genome (and therefore the number of CpG dinucleotides) is much higher. Notably, variability of <italic>MET1</italic> transcript abundance was still in a lesser extent (max 2.87-fold). This might be due to MET1-mediated methylation was target-specific and has a high level of methylation efficiency on CG targets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Miki and Shimamoto, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Meyer, 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>CpG-methylated sites are targeted by MET1 via its methyl-CpG binding domain, while DDM1 proteins interact with methyl-CpG binding domain proteins and affect their sub-nuclear localization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zemach et al., 2005</xref>). The <italic>A. thaliana DDM1</italic> mutation induces a reduction in DNA methylation level, and is stably inherited (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kakutani et al., 1999</xref>). In the present study, the transcript abundances of MET1 and DDM1 genes were all enhanced with increased ploidy level, however, only MET1 positively correlated with the nuclear DNA content, while DDM1 transcript abundance was not correlated. This can be explained by the difference in the DNA methylation efficiency between DDM1 and MET1. Because <italic>MET1</italic> product is DNA methyltransferase, while <italic>DDM1</italic> product functions as a modifier of DNA methyltransferases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kakutani et al., 1995</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Inter-specific variability in <italic>C</italic>-methylation (DNA-5&#x2032;-CCGG sites) within the same ploidy level in the <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> genus is quite limited, and the nuclear DNA of higher ploidy species is also not necessarily more highly methylated than that of the low ploidy genomes. The transcript abundance of both <italic>MET1</italic> and <italic>DDM1</italic> was enhanced with increased ploidy level but only <italic>MET1</italic> was positively correlated with the nuclear DNA content. Since the higher ploidy genomes harbor a larger number of CpG sites, the enhance of <italic>MET1</italic> transcript abundance would likely have made no significant impact on the overall proportion of methylated sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author contributions</title>
<p>Conceived and designed the experiments: HW, FC, NT, SC. Performed the experiments: HW, FC, ZG. Analyzed the data: HW, XQ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WF, ZG. Wrote the paper: HW, SC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272203, 31272196, 31372092, 31370699, 31372100), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Chinese Ministry of Education (NCET-12-0890), the Fund for Independent Innovation of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Province [CX(12)2020], the Program for Hi-Tech Research, Jiangsu, China (BE2012350), and A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00668">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00668</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="SM7" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S1</label>
<caption><p><bold>The strategy for isolating <italic>CnMET1</italic></bold>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="SM1" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.TIF" id="SM8" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Figure S2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Average expression stability (<italic>M</italic>) values of the reference genes, as calculated by geNorm, where a low M reflects stability and a high M instability, asterisk is the selected reference gene.(A)</bold> Reference gene selection in 2x vs. 4x/ 4x vs. 6x/6x vs. 8x/8x vs. 10x, <italic>EF1</italic>&#x03B1;, <italic>TUB</italic>, and <italic>ACTIN</italic> were selected; <bold>(B)</bold> As <italic>EF1</italic>&#x03B1; was predicted to deliver the most reliable level of normalization for 2x vs. 4x vs. 6x, <italic>PP2A</italic> has the lowest <italic>M</italic>-value in 4x vs. 8x vs. 10x ploidy, <italic>PP2A</italic> was selected as inter-run calibrators (IRCs) for normalizing <italic>EF1</italic>&#x03B1;, <italic>TUB</italic>, and <italic>ACTIN</italic>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.TIF" id="SM2" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.XLSX" id="SM9" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Data S1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Binary allele calls for MSAP data</bold>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.XLSX" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.XLSX" id="SM10" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Data S2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Expression stability of the reference genes, as calculated by NormFinder</bold>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.XLSX" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.DOCX" id="SM6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd E-Twab</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kondo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Rapid genome reshu&#xFB04;ing induced by allopolyploidization in F1 hybrid in <italic>Chrysanthemum remotipinnum</italic> (formerly Ajania remotipinna) and <italic>Chrysanthemum chanetii</italic> (formerly <italic>Dendranthema chanetii</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>Chromosome Bot.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3199/iscb.2.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd El-Twab</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kondo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Fluorescence in situ hydridization and genomic in situ hybridization to identify the parental genomes in the intergeneric hybrid between <italic>Chrysanthemum japonicum</italic> and <italic>Nipponanthemum nipponicum</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Chromosome Bot.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3199/iscb.1.7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd El-Twab</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kondo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genome mutation revealed by artificial hybridization between <italic>Chrysanthemum yoshinaganthum</italic> and <italic>Chrysanthemum vestitum</italic> assessed by FISH and GISH.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>2012</volume> <issue>480310</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/480310</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00D8;rntoft</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets.</article-title> <source><italic>Cancer Res.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>5245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5250</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji-Shuang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Study on cytology of some species in <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>North. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <issue>049</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barker</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kane</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matvienko</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kozik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michelmore</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knapp</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Multiple paleopolyploidizations during the evolution of the Compositae reveal parallel patterns of duplicate gene retention after millions of years.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Biol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>2445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2455</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msn187</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henderson</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobsen</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Rev. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg1601</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Advances in cytology and molecular cytogenetics of the genus <italic>Dendranthema</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Nanjing Agr. Univ.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>P. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cokus</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pellegrini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>BS Seeker: precise mapping for bisulfite sequencing.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>203</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-11-203</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>406</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103835</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of genomic rearrangements and gene expression changes in plant polyploids.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioessays</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bies.20374</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fortune</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schierenbeck</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ainouche</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacquemin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ainouche</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Evolutionary dynamics of Waxy and the origin of hexaploid <italic>Spartina</italic> species (Poaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>1040</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1055</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fulne&#x010D;ek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kova&#x0159;&#x00ED;k</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles?</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genet.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>:<issue>2</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2156-15-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeddeloh</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stokes</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2-like protein.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/8803</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wickett</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayyampalayam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chanderbali</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landherr</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ralph</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>473</volume> <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09916</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kakutani</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeddeloh</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Characterization of an <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> DNA hypomethylation mutant.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/23.1.130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kakutani</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munakata</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirochika</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Meiotically and mitotically stable inheritance of DNA hypomethylation induced by ddm1 mutation of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>151</volume> <fpage>831</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>838</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kankel</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramsey</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stokes</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flowers</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haag</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeddeloh</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title><italic>Arabidopsis</italic> MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>163</volume> <fpage>1109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1122</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Homeolog loss and expression changes in natural populations of the recently and repeatedly formed allotetraploid <italic>Tragopogon mirus</italic> (Asteraceae).</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>97</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-11-97</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leitch</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leitch</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>320</volume> <fpage>481</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>483</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1153585</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lister</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x2019;Malley</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tonti-Filippini</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gregory</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Millar</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Cell</italic></source> <volume>133</volume> <fpage>523</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brubaker</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mergeai</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cronn</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Polyploid formation in cotton is not accompanied by rapid genomic changes.</article-title> <source><italic>Genome</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>321</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>330</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny of the genus <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> L.: evidence from single-copy nuclear gene and chloroplast DNA sequences.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS ONE</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>e48970</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0048970</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>In vitro induced tetraploid of <italic>Dendranthema nankingense</italic> (Nakai) Tzvel. shows an improved level of abiotic stress tolerance.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>127</volume> <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>419</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2010.10.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malinska</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tate</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matyasek</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leitch</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Similar patterns of rDNA evolution in synthetic and recently formed natural populations of <italic>Tragopogon</italic> (Asteraceae) allotetraploids.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Evol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>291</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-10-291</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martienssen</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Colot</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>293</volume> <fpage>1070</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1074</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.293.5532.1070</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cervera</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez-Benito</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Genetic stability analysis of chrysanthemum (<italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> x <italic>morifolium</italic> Ramat) after different stages of an encapsulation-dehydration cryopreservation protocol.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>168</volume> <fpage>158</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2010.06.025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McClelland</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raschke</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Effect of site-specific modification on restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>3640</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3659</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/22.17.3640</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>DNA methylation systems and targets in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>FEBS Lett.</italic></source> <volume>585</volume> <fpage>2008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2015</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miki</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shimamoto</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>De novo DNA methylation induced by siRNA targeted to endogenous transcribed sequences is gene-specific and OsMet1-independent in rice.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>549</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03624.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parisod</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holderegger</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brochmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>186</volume> <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03142.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Generality and characteristics of genetic and epigenetic changes in newly synthesized allotetraploid wheat lines.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Genet. Genome</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>737</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>748</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60091-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rangwala</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The value-added genome: building and maintaining genomic cytosine methylation landscapes.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>686</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>691</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gde.2004.09.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rapp</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Epigenetics and plant evolution.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>168</volume> <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01491.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reyna-Lopez</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruiz-Herrera</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Differences in DNA methylation patterns are detectable during the dimorphic transition of fungi by amplification of restriction polymorphisms.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Gen. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>253</volume> <fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004380050374</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Riddle</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The control of natural variation in cytosine methylation in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>162</volume> <fpage>355</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>DNA methylation: past, present and future directions.</article-title> <source><italic>Carcinogenesis</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>467</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/carcin/21.3.461</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salmon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ainouche</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in <italic>Spartina</italic> (Poaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>1163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02488.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saze</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheid</surname> <given-names>O. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paszkowski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng1138</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sha</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Analysis of DNA methylation related to rice adult plant resistance to bacterial blight based on methylation-sensitive AFLP (MSAP) analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Genet. Genomics</italic></source> <volume>273</volume> <fpage>484</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>490</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00438-005-1148-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaked</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kashkush</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozkan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feldman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Sequence elimination and cytosine methylation are rapid and reproducible responses of the genome to wide hybridization and allopolyploidy in wheat.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>1749</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1759</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steward</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kusano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sano</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Expression of ZmMET1, a gene encoding a DNA methyltransferase from maize, is associated not only with DNA replication in actively proliferating cells, but also with altered DNA methylation status in cold-stressed quiescent cells.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleic Acids Res.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>3250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3259</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/28.17.3250</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name> <name><surname>Via</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>A rapid CTAB DNA isolation technique useful for RAPD fingerprinting and other PCR applications.</article-title> <source><italic>Biotechniques</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>748</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>750</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takeda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paszkowski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis.</article-title> <source><italic>Chromosoma</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00412-005-0031-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teng</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Intergeneric hybridization and relationship of genera within the tribe Anthemideae Cass.(I. <italic>Dendranthema crassum</italic> (kitam.) kitam.&#x00D7; <italic>Crossostephium chinense</italic> (L.) Makino).</article-title> <source><italic>Euphytica</italic></source> <volume>169</volume> <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Intergeneric hybridization between <italic>Dendranthema nankingense</italic> and <italic>Tanacetum vulgare</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>132</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teng</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>First intergeneric hybrids within the tribe Anthemideae Cass. III. <italic>Chrysanthemum indicum</italic> L. Des Moul.&#x00D7; <italic>Opisthopappus taihangensis</italic> (Ling) Shih.</article-title> <source><italic>Biochem. Syst. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uehara</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakata</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitajima</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iwashina</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Internal and external flavonoids from the leaves of Japanese <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> species (Asteraceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Biochem. Syst. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bse.2011.12.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vandesompele</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Preter</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pattyn</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poppe</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Roy</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Paepe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.</article-title> <source><italic>Genom. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <issue>research0034</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Marker-based analysis of genome structure and DNA methylation in a watermelon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>) ploidy series.</article-title> <source><italic>Bot. Stud.</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>402</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Reference gene selection for cross-species and cross-ploidy level comparisons in <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> spp.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <issue>8094</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep08094</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014a</year>). <article-title>Characterization of in vitro haploid and doubled haploid <italic>Chrysanthemum morifolium</italic> plants via unfertilized ovule culture for phenotypical traits and DNA methylation pattern.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>738</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00738</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014b</year>). <article-title>Rapid genetic and epigenetic alterations under intergeneric genomic shock in newly synthesized <italic>Chrysanthemum morifolium</italic>&#x00D7;<italic>Leucanthemum paludosum</italic> hybrids (Asteraceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Genome Biol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>259</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evu008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014c</year>). <article-title>Microsatellite polymorphism among <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> sp. polyploids: the influence of whole genome duplication.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <issue>6730</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep06730</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014d</year>). <article-title>Reference genes for normalizing transcription in diploid and tetraploid <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <issue>6781</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep06781</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013a</year>). <article-title>Rapid genomic and transcriptomic alterations induced by wide hybridization: <italic>Chrysanthemum nankingense</italic> x <italic>Tanacetum vulgare</italic> and C. <italic>crassum</italic> x <italic>Crossostephium chinense</italic> (Asteraceae).</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Genomics</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<issue>902</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-14-902</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2013b</year>). <article-title>Next-generation sequencing of the <italic>Chrysanthemum nankingense</italic> (Asteraceae) transcriptome permits large-scale unigene assembly and SSR marker discovery.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS ONE</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>e62293</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0062293</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Madlung</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Stochastic and epigenetic changes of gene expression in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> polyploids.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetics</italic></source> <volume>167</volume> <fpage>1961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1973</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.104.027896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Studies on the control of diploid-like meiosis in polyploid taxa of <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic>. II. Octoploid Ch. ornatum Hemsley.</article-title> <source><italic>Cytologia</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>513</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1508/cytologia.46.459</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Studies on the control of diploid-like meiosis in polyploid taxa of <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Theor. Appl. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00281840</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maroof</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Patterns of cytosine methylation in an elite rice hybrid and its parental lines, detected by a methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism technique.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Gen. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>261</volume> <fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>446</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004380050986</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glover</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Molecular evidence for multiple polyploidization and lineage recombination in the <italic>Chrysanthemum indicum</italic> polyploid complex (Asteraceae).</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>171</volume> <fpage>875</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>886</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01779.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zemach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wayburn</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ben-Meir</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiss</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Avivi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>DDM1 binds <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> methyl-CpG binding domain proteins and affects their subnuclear localization.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>1549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1558</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.105.031567</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Morphological characteristics and chromosome behaviour in F1, F2 and BC1 progenies between <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic>&#x00D7;<italic>morifolium</italic> and <italic>Ajania pacifica</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Russ. J. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>48</volume> <fpage>808</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>818</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title><italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> genetic resources and related genera of <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> collected in China.</article-title> <source><italic>Genetic Resour. Crop Evol.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>937</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>946</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10722-009-9412-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Epigenetic inheritance and variation of DNA methylation level and pattern in maize intra-specific hybrids.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>172</volume> <fpage>930</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>938</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.01.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn01"><label>1</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rebase.neb.com">http://rebase.neb.com</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn02"><label>2</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.php">http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.php</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>