Role of proline and GABA in sexual reproduction of angiosperms

Two glutamate derivatives, proline and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), appear to play pivotal roles in different aspects of sexual reproduction in angiosperms, although their precise function in plant reproduction and the molecular basis of their action are not yet fully understood. Proline and GABA have long been regarded as pivotal amino acids in pollen vitality and fertility. Proline may constitute up to 70% of the free amino acid pool in pollen grains and it has been recently shown that Arabidopsis mutants affected in the first and rate-limiting step in proline synthesis produce aberrant and infertile pollen grains, indicating that proline synthesis is required for pollen development and fertility. Concerning GABA, a large body of evidence points to this glutamate derivative as a key determinant of post-pollination fertilization. Intriguingly, proline has also been associated with pollination, another aspect of sexual reproduction, since honeybees were reported to show a strong preference for proline-enriched nectars. In this review, we survey current knowledge on the roles of proline and GABA in plant fertility, and discuss future perspectives potentially capable to improve our understanding on the functions of these amino acids in pollen development, pollination, and pollen tube guidance.


Setting the Scene: Microsporogenesis and Microgametogenesis
Higher plants cycle between a diploid sporophytic generation and a haploid gametophytic generation. While spending most of their lifespan as diploid individuals, plants rely on their haploid gametophytic generation for sexual reproduction. Cells committed to sexual reproduction undergo meiosis in specialized organs of the flower, called stamens and pistils, and, after a limited number of mitoses, develop as mature haploid gametophytes. The male gametophyte, also referred to as micro-gametophyte or pollen grain, develops in the pollen sac of the anther passing through two sequential developmental phases, called microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis (Figure 1).
In early stages of pollen development, microsporogenesis takes place within the anthers, where archeosporal cells divide periclinally to generate an outer parietal layer and an inner sporogenous layer. The outer layer undergoes both periclinal and anticlinal divisions, to generate concentric layers that differentiate into the endothecium, middle layer, and the tapetum. The inner layer gives rise to the microsporocytes, also known as pollen mother cells or meiocytes, which divide by meiosis to form a tetrad, consisting of four haploid microspores embedded in a joint callose coat. The microspores are eventually released from the tetrad as single-celled haploid microspores, by the action of a ß(1-3) glucanase (callase) secreted by the tapetum. In addition to producing hydrolytic enzymes for callose degradation, the tapetum supplies nutrients and metabolites to the developing microspores and plays an essential role in pollen development, as first shown by Mariani et al. (1990), who reported that a genetic ablation of the tapetal cells results in male sterility. In early stages of pollen development, before meiosis takes place, all the layers of the anther are physically interconnected with the tapetum by plasmodesmata, through which all nutrients and metabolites can be freely exchanged. After tetrad separation, the microspores start to build an extremely durable extracellular layer, the exine, to which the tapetum contributes the major building material, the sporopollenin. However, at the end of microspore development, by the time of pollen mitosis I (PM I), the tapetum starts a process of progressive vacuolization and degeneration, and from this point onward the developing microspores have to rely on endogenous resources. The series of events leading from unicellular microspores to mature bior tri-cellular pollen grains, depending on species, is known as microgametogenesis (Figure 1). During this phase the unicellular microspores, generated by callose degradation of the tetrads, begin a process of expansion and vacuolization usually leading to the formation of a large vacuole. The nucleus undergoes PM I, an asymmetric mitotic division, which generates a pollen grain with a larger vegetative cell and a smaller generative cell. The generative cell subsequently separates from the pollen grain wall and gets internalized into the cytoplasm of the vegetative cell. In some plant families (e.g., Cruciferae and Gramineae), the generative cell divides once more by mitosis (PM II) to form two sperm cells in the mature, tri-cellular pollen grain. In many angiosperm families, however, the pollen grain is released from the anther after the first mitotic division as a bi-cellular pollen grain and PM II occurs after pollen germination, when the pollen tube is already growing through the female pistil. The two generative cells are delivered through the pollen tube to the embryo sac within the ovule to fertilize the egg cell and the central cell (double fertilization). At the mature stage, the pollen is covered by the resistant exine coat and is highly dehydrated, probably to withstand even harsh environmental conditions during the transfer to a pistil. Rehydration of the pollen happens on the stigma surface of a compatible pistil and leads to germination and growth of the pollen tube.

Proline and Pollen Development: A Historical Perspective
Beside the well-established role of proline in protein synthesis, this amino acid is known to participate to the set of responses put in place by cells to respond to, and protect from different types of stresses, particularly salt and drought stress (for a review see Hayat et al., 2012). Indeed, accumulation of proline under stress is a well-documented phenomenon in a large number of different organisms, including protozoa, eubacteria, marine invertebrates, algae, and plants . In higher plants, however, proline has also been shown to participate in plant development, accumulating under non-stressed conditions in specific developmental phases, particularly in reproductive organs and structures, such as flowers, anthers and pollen grains. The first hints of the special role played by proline in pollen development and function came from qualitative and quantitative analyses of free amino acid content made by independent laboratories in several plant species. As early as 1948, Auclair and Jamieson reported a high, although not precisely quantified, content of free proline in the pollen grains of dandelion (Taraxum officinale) and willow (Salix spp.) (Auclair and Jamieson, 1948). The first quantitative assessment of proline content in pollen was probably performed by Bathurst (1954), who analyzed the free amino acidic content in the pollen grains of four species of grasses, finding the presence of 17 amino acids, of which proline was the most highly represented accounting for 1.65% of pollen dry weight. Since these initial reports, several other authors (including but not limited to Vansuyt et al., 1979;Venekamp and Koot, 1988;Mutters et al., 1989;Walton et al., 1991;Chiang and Dandekar, 1995;Schwacke et al., 1999) confirmed these findings and reported strong accumulation of proline in floral organs, siliques, and pollen grains of different plant species under unstressed physiological conditions. As evidenced in Arabidopsis by Chiang and Dandekar (1995), the content of proline is low during the vegetative phase, but starts to accumulate dramatically in the reproductive phase, just after floral transition. These authors reported that proline accumulates in Arabidopsis reproductive tissues, such as flowers and seeds, to up to 26% of the total free amino acid pool while in vegetative tissues, such as rosette leaves and roots, it only represents 1-3% of the total free amino acids. As pointed out by the authors, proline accumulation in reproductive organs might be correlated to the levels of desiccation tolerance, as most of the tissues enriched in proline, such as pollen grains, seeds and embryos, are naturally dehydrated (Chiang and Dandekar, 1995). In this case proline might function as a compatible osmolyte protecting cells from the detrimental effects of dehydration, and both developmental and environmental responses might be part of a common strategy against drought and water stress. Although there is no general agreement, as yet, on the actual role of proline in development, it is largely accepted that pollen grains are the plant structures with the highest proline concentration. In a study conducted in the anthers of devil's trumpet (Datura metel), a Solanaceous species, Sangwan (1978) analyzed the changes in the amino acid content occurring in pollen throughout development and found the presence of a limited number of free amino acids (proline, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, threonine, serine, and alanine), of which proline was the most abundant and the only one to show a consistent increment during pollen development. Similarly, during in vitro germination of Petunia pollen, Hong-Qi et al. (1982) reported that proline was the most abundant amino acid, accounting for 55% of the total amino acid pool and exceeding by 70% the proline incorporated in proteins (Hong-Qi et al., 1982). In the most striking case, reported by Schwacke et al. (1999), the content of free proline in tomato flowers was found to be 60-fold higher than in any other organ analyzed. Within the floral organs, most of the free proline was found in pollen, where it represented over 70% of total free amino acids.

Expression Pattern of Proline Metabolic and Transporter Genes
In higher plants, proline is mainly synthesized in the cytoplasm from glutamate (Figure 2), which is converted into glutamic-semialdehyde (GSA) by the bi-functional enzyme δ 1 -pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) synthetase (P5CS). GSA spontaneously cyclizes into P5C, which, in turn, is reduced to proline by the action of P5C reductase (P5CR). Alternative routes of proline synthesis are possible from ornithine via ornithine δ-aminotransferase (δ-OAT) and, possibly, ornithine α-aminotransferase (α-OAT), but these alternative pathways have been shown to have no or little relevance in proline synthesis (Funck et al., 2008). The enzyme catalyzing the first and rate-limiting step of proline synthesis in higher plants, P5CS, is coded for in Arabidopsis by P5CS1 and P5CS2, two paralog genes sharing extensive sequence homology (Strizhov et al., 1997). Proline catabolism takes place in mitochondria, where proline is oxidized to glutamate by the sequential action of proline dehydrogenase (ProDH) and pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (P5CDH) (Figure 2). In most plant species several abiotic stresses, particularly salt and drought stress, induce accumulation of high levels of proline. At molecular level stress-induced proline accumulation is mainly due to the increased synthesis and reduced degradation of proline, accounted for by the contemporaneous upregulation of P5CS1, and downregulation of ProDH (Verbruggen and Hermans, 2008;Szabados and Savouré, 2010). Proline accumulation, however, also occurs under non-stressed conditions in specific developmental phases , and is likely controlled by different regulatory conditions. In non-stressed conditions, the pattern of expression of P5CS1 and P5CS2 is complex and conflicting data have been reported from different groups. High expression of P5CS1 was initially detected in Arabidopsis flowers by Savouré et al. (1995) and Yoshiba et al. (1995) by Northern blot analysis. The existence of a second gene coding for P5CS that is subjected to differential regulation, was subsequently assessed by Strizhov et al. (1997), who found high P5CS1 expression, and, respectively, low P5CS2 expression in differentiated tissues of Arabidopsis, such as roots, stems, leaves and flowers. Though, the expression of P5CS2 was high in dividing cells from callus and cell cultures (Strizhov et al., 1997). In contrast, similar levels of both P5CS1 and P5CS2 transcripts were reported in flowers and embryos by Mattioli et al. (2009), and in embryos by Székely et al. (2008). However, although P5CS1 and P5CS2 transcripts may share a similar pattern of expression in embryos, only homozygous p5cs2 mutants are embryo-lethal while p5cs1 mutants are not, indicating that the FIGURE 2 | Pathway of proline and GABA metabolism in higher plants.
embryo-lethality of p5cs2 mutants is not caused by differential transcriptional regulation of the two P5CS genes. According to Székely et al. (2008), the striking difference between P5CS1 and P5CS2 in embryo development could be accounted for by a different sub-cellular localization of P5CS1 and P5CS2 proteins in embryonic cells. As observed by these authors, P5CS1-GFP exhibited a peculiar dotted pattern in embryonic cells, in contrast with the uniform cytoplasmic distribution of P5CS2-GFP. By high-resolution confocal laser scanning microscopy, P5CS1-GFP turned out to be sequestered into so far uncharacterized subcellular bodies, suggesting that the sequestered P5CS1 could be a non-functional enzyme unable to complement proline deficiency in homozygous p5cs2 embryos. Consistent with transcript detection by in situ-hybridization, P5CS-GFP was also detected in inflorescence meristems, flower primordia, flower buds and anthers, although experiments with reporter genes should always be interpreted with caution.
Another strong confirmation of the importance of proline in the reproductive phase of angiosperms came from the observation that the genes coding for metabolic enzymes and transport proteins of the proline pathway (Figure 2) tend to be highly expressed in reproductive organs. Rentsch et al. (1996) reported that Proline Transporter 1 (ProT1), a gene coding for a specific proline transporter belonging to the amino acid permease (AAP) gene family, was highly expressed in Arabidopsis flowers, and was downregulated in the course of flower development, suggesting a role of ProT1 in flowers. Similarly Schwacke et al. (1999) reported that LeProT1, a tomato homolog of ProT1, was highly expressed in tomato flowers, as revealed by Northern blot analysis. The expression of LeProT1 increased steadily during flower development, and reached a peak at anther dehiscence. Moreover, through in situ hybridization performed on dissected flowers, these authors found that the expression of LeProT1 is restricted to anthers, consistent with the high concentration of proline measured in pollen grains. More recently Grallath et al. (2005) and Lehmann et al. (2011) reported that AtPro1, as well as AtPro3, a new member of the AtProT gene family, were strongly expressed in flowers, especially in mature pollen, suggesting that AtProT1 is important for flower development. In addition, AtProT1 expression was detected in the phloem or phloem parenchyma cells throughout the whole plant, indicating a possible role in long-distance proline transport. Interestingly, Grallath et al. (2005) also described that, contrary to previous reports, all ProT amino acid transporters could transport γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), in addition to proline, although with lower efficiency. This finding raises the possibility that GABA as well as proline might be transported to floral tissues through the phloem.
Surprisingly, deletion of the gene ProT1 in Arabidopsis had no effect on the composition of the free amino acid pool in mature pollen, while it affected the contents of free glutamate and arginine, but not proline or GABA in germinating pollen (Lehmann et al., 2011). In addition, in spite of the altered concentrations of glutamate and arginine, pollen germination of prot1-1 mutants was normal, possibly because of a functional complementation by ProT3. Unfortunately, amino acid analyses of double or triple prot mutant pollen have not been reported yet.
The evidence that the variation of glutamate and arginine was only seen in germinating pollen from prot1-1 mutants may suggest that proline transport is especially or uniquely active during pollen germination. This hypothesis is consistent with independent pollen transcriptome analyses, which detected high ProT1 transcript abundance during late stages of pollen maturation, just before pollen germination (Honys and Twell, 2004;Bock et al., 2006). The variation of the amino acid composition of prot1-1 germinating pollen relative to wild type-with glutamate and arginine showing a lower and higher concentration, respectively-is more difficult to interpret. According to Shelp et al. (1999) in vitro germination and subsequent harvesting is stressful to germinating pollen and causes a raise of proline and GABA. Accordingly, we may speculate that under stress conditions, ProT3 may not be able to compensate for the lack of ProT1 in germinating prot1-1 pollen, causing a compensative induction of endogenous proline synthesis and, in turn, depletion of glutamate and increase of arginine.
In Arabidopsis, the genes coding for the enzymes mediating proline catabolism are also highly expressed in reproductive organs, and both ProDH and P5CDH are more expressed in floral tissues, especially pollen, than in vegetative tissues. In 8week-old Arabidopsis plants expressing the gene uidA under the control of the ProDH promoter, GUS expression was observed in pollen, in mature stigmas with pollen, in stigma of immature siliques, in ovules, and in the abscission zone of sepals and petals (Nakashima et al., 1998). Similarly, strong GUS expression was detected in pollen grains of P5CDH-GUS transgenic Arabidopsis by Deuschle et al. (2004). In spite of the high level of ProDH and P5CDH transcription driven in pollen by their respective promoters, the actual activities of these enzymes have not been analyzed to date, and their putative function in pollen remains unknown.

New Insights in the Role of Proline in Pollen Development
Recently, Arabidopsis mutants defective in proline biosynthetic enzymes were found to produce aberrant and infertile pollen grains, providing genetic and molecular support to the idea that proline is required for pollen development (Funck et al., 2012;Mattioli et al., 2012). T-DNA insertional mutants have been characterized for both P5CS1 Székely et al., 2008) and P5CS2 (Székely et al., 2008;Mattioli et al., 2009), and their phenotypes provided information about the specific functions of P5CS1 and P5CS2 that have been summarized previously (Szabados and Savouré, 2010).
Homozygous mutants for p5cs2 are embryo lethal under normal cultivation conditions (Székely et al., 2008;Mattioli et al., 2009), although Funck et al. (2012) were able to generate viable and fertile homozygous p5cs2 mutants by in vitro cultivation of immature mutant seeds supplemented with exogenous proline and sucrose. In contrast, p5cs1 p5cs2 double mutants, homozygous for both p5cs1 and p5cs2 mutant alleles, were not vital and could not be isolated. However, by using heterozygous double mutants, two groups independently reported defects in pollen development and fertility associated with proline deficiency in presumably double homozygous pollen (Funck et al., 2012;Mattioli et al., 2012). Both groups found that in reciprocal crosses between plants homozygous for p5cs1 and heterozygous for p5cs2 (p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2) and wild type, the p5cs2 mutant allele was not transmitted to the offspring when the proline-deficient p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 plant was used as a pollen donor, but was detected in almost half of the progeny when p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 flowers were used as a female. In addition, the dominant sulfadiazine resistance marker, linked to the p5cs2 allele, was found to segregate in a 1:1 ratio, as expected in a gametophytic mutation, and the siliques of the self-pollinated population were found to be devoid of aberrant embryos, as expected if a gametophytic defect should prevent the formation of homozygous embryos (Funck et al., 2012;Mattioli et al., 2012). Morphological and functional analysis of the mutant pollen revealed, at least from stage 11 of pollen development, a population of small, progressively degenerating pollen grains, representing about half of the total pollen population. The aberrant pollen grains appeared misshaped, shriveled and no longer viable, as revealed by orcein staining, DAPI analysis, Alexander's staining, and in vitro pollen germination assays. As expected for a mutant carrying mutations in both the genes encoding P5CS, the partial double mutant p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 accumulates very little proline, on average one fourth as much as a wild type, and this proline shortage is the likely cause of the developmental defects of pollen grains from p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 mutants. Accordingly, the content of free proline measured in pollen grains from p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 mutants was 105 ± 23 ng, roughly corresponding to 15 pg/pollen of proline, compared to 336 ± 31 ng, roughly corresponding to 48 pg/pollen, measured in pollen grains from Col-0 wild type (Mattioli et al., 2012). Importantly, 10 µM L-proline, supplemented in planta to developing anthers of p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 mutants, significantly complemented the morphological and physiological defects of pollen grains from p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 mutants (Mattioli et al., 2012). Surprisingly, pollen carrying a mutation in the single copy of P5CR, the gene coding for the second and final step in proline biosynthesis, did not show developmental or fertility defects (Funck et al., 2012). Although proline is clearly required for pollen development and fertility, the relative role of proline coming from, or synthesized in, gametophytic (i.e., pollen grains) and sporophytic (i.e., tapetum) tissues is yet to be clarified. Intriguingly the presence of the p5cs2 mutant allele was detected, by PCR analysis, also in the wild type-like population of pollen grains from p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 mutants (Mattioli et al., 2012), suggesting that the phenotypic aberrations observed in pollen grains from p5cs1 p5cs2/P5CS2 flowers, may not, or not only, have a genetic basis, which prompts an investigation of the relevance of proline coming from either sporophytic or gametophytic tissues. Equally unknown, at present, is the role of proline in pollen development. Several authors (Chiang and Dandekar, 1995;Székely et al., 2008) have proposed that proline accumulation may function to protect macromolecular structures in pollen grains during dehydratation, essentially because proline is a well-known compatible osmolyte and because a mature pollen grain is a highly dehydrated structure. Although this is a likely hypothesis, it still lacks a formal demonstration, and other functions, such as energy source or signaling molecule, are equally possible and are being actively investigated.

Proline and Pollination: To Bee or Not to Bee
Intriguingly, proline has been also associated with pollination, another aspect of sexual reproduction of angiosperms, since honeybees were reported to show a strong preference for prolineenriched nectars (Carter et al., 2006;Bertazzini et al., 2010). To ensure efficient pollination, numerous angiosperms depend upon pollinators, usually birds or flying insects, to transfer the mature gametophyte from the dehisced anther to a receptive stigma. Pollinators are attracted to pollen grains by the use of specialized strategies co-evolved with prevalent pollinator species. In most of the cases flowers have evolved bright and vivid colors, fragrant scents and sweet and nourishing nectars to attract insects, particularly butterflies and honeybees. Once a pollinator lands on a flower, during its daily foraging activity, pollen grains get stuck on the pollinator to be transported from flower to flower to accomplish a high degree of cross-pollination. However, many of the pollinating insects also actively collect the nutrientand proline-rich pollen itself, especially to support their own reproduction and growth. By collecting a significant proportion of the pollen, the pollinators force the plants to produce pollen in large excess over the need for pollination.
Key to pollination activity is nectar, an aqueous sugar solution mainly derived from phloem sap and synthesized in specialized cells, located at the base of the ovary and known as nectaries. Within these specialized floral cells, phloem sap is enzymatically processed and transformed into nectar. A relevant fraction of the sucrose present in the phloem, for instance, is usually hydrolyzed to glucose and fructose. However, not all the components of the phloem sap are modified and in several instances nectar composition simply reflects the composition of phloem sap, as in the case of proline, which mainly derives from the proline present in phloem sap and actively transported from vegetative to reproductive tissues.
The molecular and genetic basis of the dynamic interaction between pollinators and proline content in nectar is unknown, but it might be mediated by pollination signals similarly to the coordination between pollination and nectar production, which has been shown to be coordinated either by jasmonic acid (Heil, 2004;Radhika et al., 2010) or auxin (Bender et al., 2013). Regardless of environmental cues, nectar production and secretion are under strict developmental control to ensure coordination between pollen shed and nectar secretion and to minimize energy waste. It has been calculated that nectar production consumes up to 37% of a plant's available energy (Pyke, 1991). Consistently a large number of genes involved in regulating nectar composition and secretion are timely expressed in nectaries or adjacent tissues. As an example, immature nectaries are devoid of invertase and accumulate starch in early developmental phases. Around anthesis CELL WALL INVERTASE 4 (AtCWINV4), becomes strongly induced in nectaries allowing them to accumulate the glucose and fructose necessary for nectar production (Ruhlmann et al., 2010). Accordingly, because proline homeostasis derives from a finetuning among proline synthesis, degradation and transport, the production of nectars enriched in proline likely implies a complex developmental and tissue-specific regulation of proline metabolism. Even if proline is predominantly delivered by the phloem sap, a contribution of local proline synthesis in the nectaries from glutamate cannot be role rule out. In support of this possibility, microarray and RNA sequencing data from Arabidopsis nectaries revealed significant expression of P5CS2 in mature nectaries (Kram et al., 2009;Bender et al., 2013).
Honeybees, the most efficient and wide-spread pollinators on a world scale, use nectar as their primary carbohydrate, amino acid and energy source, to provide energy for flight, colony maintenance, general daily activities and nutrient storage for the winter. There is an intimate relationship between nectar and honeybees as, on one hand, nectar is essential for honeybee's life and, on the other hand, plants need the foraging activity of honeybees for cross-pollination, and eventually species survival. The attractiveness of nectars for honeybees has important practical implications since a more attractive nectar will induce bees to show a higher fidelity to flowers of the same species and more cross-fertilized seeds will be produced, increasing, in turn, crop productivity (Allen-Wardell et al., 1998). The importance of pollinator-driven cross-fertilization might be questioned for the survival of autogamous plant species, such as Arabidopsis. However, despite the advantages of self-pollination over cross-pollination in some ecological niches, occasional cross-pollination is still advantageous even in autogamous species, most of which are facultative autogamous plants (Goodwillie et al., 2005).
In addition, the quality and quantity of the honey, which bees produce from nectar, is critically dependent on the nectars produced by different plant species. Not all nectars, however, are equally attracting and nutritive, and marked differences exist among nectars from different plant species, which deeply orient honeybee's foraging activities to selected plant species. Nectar composition is extremely variable and is mainly composed of sugars, especially sucrose, glucose and fructose (Baker and Baker, 1973;Jackson and Nicolson, 2002), as well as of a number of other compounds including proteins, lipids, organic acids, alkaloids, phenolics, terpens, flavonoids, vitamins, and amino acids (Ball, 2007). Nectars also contain specific plant-defense proteins that are thought to protect the gynoecium from microbial invasion brought about by pollinators and wind (Peumans et al., 1997;Carter et al., 1999;Thornburg, 2000, 2004;Thornburg et al., 2003;Naqvi et al., 2005). Although the amino acid pool is a minor component of the nectar sap, ranging from 0.002 to 4.8% of organic matter (Gardener and Gillman, 2001), it is of relevant biological importance, at least for insects, and it has been shown that nectars from plants pollinated by insects have higher amino acid concentration than nectars from plants pollinated by birds (Baker and Baker, 1986). In addition, the quality and quantity of nectar's amino acids are believed to enhance insect longevity and fecundity (Mevi-Schutz and Erhardt, 2005). Proline, in particular, has been shown to be the most abundant amino acid in the nectar of many angiosperms (Gardener and Gillman, 2002;Kaczorowski et al., 2005;Carter et al., 2006;Terrab et al., 2007). Furthermore, it has been reported that honeybees exhibit a strong preference toward nectars rich in the amino acid proline. According to Carter et al. (2006), honeybees prefer proline-rich nectars over nectars lacking or poor in proline, and can specifically perceive and track proline-rich nectars or sugar solutions supplied with proline. The honeybees' ability to "taste" proline relies on the stimulation of the salt cells of labellar chemosensory cells, and equivalent cells are found on the sensory apparatus of further insect taxa, including hymenoptera and lepidoptera (Hansen et al., 1998;Gardener and Gillman, 2002). The strong preference that honeybees seem to grant to proline-rich nectars may rely on the energy property of this amino acid, which has been proposed as the main fuel employed by honeybees during the earliest or more expensive stages of flight (Micheu et al., 2000). Indeed, the complete oxidation of one molecule of proline yields 21 ATP molecules, almost as many as the 24 ATP molecules obtained from complete oxidation of one molecule of glucose, but obtained with no initial ATP consumption (Micheu et al., 2000). Bertazzini et al. (2010) have confirmed and extended these reports by analyzing, by dual choice feeding tests, the preference of forager honeybees for specific amino acids. They found that honeybees prefer artificial nectar containing proline over artificial nectar containing only sugars. On the contrary, nectars containing either alanine or serine gave neutral or negative responses. Importantly, when honeybees were given the choice between nectars supplemented with different amino acids, proline was preferred above both alanine and serine, and alanine above serine. While sugars (or generally energy and organic carbon) are usually not a limiting resource for plant growth, the nitrogen contained in amino acids usually is. More detailed studies will be required to reveal whether plants enrich their nectar in proline to make it especially nutritious and thus attractive for insects, or whether they try to cheat on the insects by specifically enriching proline as the amino acid that insects can best detect in the nectar.

GABA and Pollen Tube Guidance
Another glutamate derivative critically important for plant reproduction is GABA, a non-proteinogenic amino acid ubiquitously present in plants and implicated in pH regulation, plant development and pathogen defense (Shelp et al., 1999). GABA is also regarded as a stress molecule involved in the metabolic responses of plants to either abiotic stresses (Mazzucotelli et al., 2006;Michaeli and Fromm, 2015), such as low light (Michaeli et al., 2011) and salt (Renault et al., 2013), or pathogen attack (Forlani et al., 2014).
GABA is directly produced from glutamate in the cytosol by the action of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD; Figure 2). GABA degradation takes place in the mitochondrion where it is converted to succinic acid by the sequential action of GABA transaminase (GABA-T) and succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase (SSADH) (Shelp et al., 1999). A large body of evidence points to GABA as a molecule involved, at least in some species, in pollen tube growth and guidance. In flowering plants, after pollen grains are deposited on the stigma surface of a diploid female pistil, the pollen starts germination and begins to elongate a pollen tube, a cytoplasmic protrusion through which the two male sperm cells are polarly transported to the elongating tip and finally delivered to the embryo sack. Unlike animal sperms and spermatocytes of primitive plants, such as bryophytes, pollen grains from higher plants have lost their flagella during evolution, and cannot swim anymore, relying completely on pollen tube elongation and intracellular transport to reach the embryo sac and fulfill fertilization. The elongation of the pollen tube starts at a receptive stigma, continues along the style through several different cell layers, and is eventually guided to an ovule micropyle, to enter the ovule. Once the tip of the pollen tube has reached the target, the two sperm cells are released to fuse with the embryo sac, and eventually produce a diploid zygote and the triploid endosperm nucleus. As inferred by the number of mutants affecting pollen guidance (Higashiyama and Takeuchi, 2015), this developmental process is critical for plant reproduction, and of unexpected complexity. Although a simple mechanical guidance has been reported in some species (Higashiyama and Takeuchi, 2015), pollen tubes are usually guided to their target by a number of signal and attractant molecules, such as Ca ++ (Iwano et al., 2014), lipids (Wolters-Arts et al., 1998), pollen coat proteins (Mayfield et al., 2001), arabinogalactans (Wu et al., 2000;Suárez et al., 2013), pectins (Mollet et al., 2000), secreted cystein-rich proteins (Okuda et al., 2009), or brassinosteroids (Vogler et al., 2014. Consistently, transcriptomic analyses carried out both in Arabidopsis thaliana and in Torenia fourneri pollen tubes have discovered an extraordinarily high number of genes involved in pollen tube elongation, and, above all, that pollen tubes modify gene expression profiles during their growth along the pistil (Qin et al., 2009;Okuda et al., 2013).
A novel role for GABA in pollen tube growth and guidance was found out by Palanivelu et al. (2003) by characterizing the A. thaliana POP2 gene, coding for a GABA-T. Previously, the pop2 mutation was observed to cause a late-stage defect in the elongation of the pollen tube, which bypassed the micropyle and thus failed to hit the ovule cells (Wilhelmi and Preuss, 1996). Consistently with a role of POP2 in GABA degradation, pop2 flowers exhibited GABA accumulation-as much as 60 fold higher in pop2-1 flowers than in wild type flowers-leading to infertility because pop2 pollen tube growth was arrested or misguided in pop2 pistils. Fertility rate and floral GABA levels were found inversely correlated across different pop2 alleles (Palanivelu et al., 2003) suggesting that the infertility of the pop2 homozygous mutants might be associated with an aberrant accumulation of GABA along the style. Interestingly, however, wild type pollen was able to fertilize flowers of pop2 mutants, indicating that the egg and other embryo sac cells are functional. The higher success rate of wild type over pop2 mutant pollen additionally indicates that GABA processing by GABA-T within the pollen tube is essential for guidance toward the embryo sack. By a combination of enzymatic and immunohistochemical methods, a GABA gradient, with increasing concentrations from stigma to micropyle, was identified in wild type pistils, but not in pop2 pistils that showed steadily high levels of GABA all along the pistil. In addition, in in vitro germination assays, a large excess of exogenous GABA was inhibitory to pollen tube growth, although at low concentrations GABA had a stimulatory effect (Palanivelu et al., 2003). For wild type, GABA concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 mM stimulated pollen tube elongation, while higher concentrations were inhibitory. In contrast, pop2 pollen tubes were stimulated at GABA concentrations as low as 1-10 µM, and were inhibited at concentrations higher than 10 µM (Palanivelu et al., 2003). The establishment of a correct GABA gradient, therefore, is necessary to assist fertilization by guiding the growing pollen tube from the stigma surface to the ovule micropyle, in a way that resembles the guidance function of GABA in animal systems, where the migrating neuronal precursor cells of spinal and cortical neurons reach their target destinations with the help of GABA receptors and Ca ++ signaling (Behar et al., 2001).
As in animals, the mechanism of GABA guidance of pollen tube seems in fact to rely on Ca ++ signaling. Yu et al. (2014) measured the dynamics of Ca ++ fluxes, by means of whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments and non-invasive micromeasurement technology, and proposed that the influx of Ca ++ increased in pollen tubes in response to exogenous GABA. In addition, since the Ca ++ responses to GABA were specifically blocked by Gd 3+ , a specific inhibitor of Ca ++ -permeable channels, the authors concluded that signaling triggered by exogenous GABA affects pollen tube growth by modulating putative Ca ++ -permeable membrane channels.
Recently, the activity of an aluminum-activated malate transporter in wheat (TaALMT1, Ramesh et al., 2015), belonging to a large family of plant anion channels/transporters (ALMT) was shown to be regulated by GABA. ALMTs of six plant species were regulated by GABA, confirming that GABA acts as a signaling molecule by regulating ion fluxes across cell membranes in plants, as it does in animals. Ramesh et al. (2015) demonstrated that malate flux through TaALMT1 is stimulated by anions and inhibited by GABA leading to increased or reduced root growth, respectively, most probably mediated by changes in the membrane potential. Interestingly, malate flux and, in turn, root growth were specifically inhibited by muscimol-a GABA analog working as a specific agonist of mammalian GABA A receptors (Olsen and Sieghart, 2008). In addition, the effect of muscimol was attenuated by treatment with bicuculline-a well-known competitive antagonist of GABA binding to mammalian GABA A receptors (Olsen and Sieghart, 2008).
Overall these results indicate that GABA exerts at least some of its multiple physiological effects in plants, including pollen tube guidance and root growth, through modulation of ALMT activity, and that GABA can finally be regarded as a genuine signaling molecule in plant, as it is in animals. Accordingly Ramesh et al. (2015) provided evidence that also pollen tube elongation and guidance depend on GABA-gated activity of ALMTs, since muscimol reduced A. thaliana and Vitis vinifera pollen tube elongation in vitro, while bicuculline antagonized muscimol regulation.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The overall picture that emerges from this review is the surprising and specific importance of proline and GABA in aspects of plant reproduction as important as pollen development, pollination, and pollen tube guidance. Egg cell development seems much more tolerant to disturbances in proline and GABA metabolism, potentially because the embryo sack is in closer contact to the parental tissue. For each one developmental process, however, much work has still to be done and we have more open questions than precise answers available. For instance, during pollen development and fertilization the importance of proline synthesized within the male gametophyte, from unicellular microspore to tricellular pollen, compared to proline that may be provided by sporophytic tissues, is still unclear. In addition, the precise function of proline in pollen development and fertility remains, as yet, elusive.
With regard to the role of proline in pollination, by contrast, it is generally believed that the high energetic value of proline has been the underlying reason for the actual preference of honeybees for proline-rich nectars. It remains to be seen, however, how strong this preference is, and its ecologic and agronomic impact on crops and cultivations.
As to the role of GABA in pollen guidance, in spite of the recent advances of our knowledge on GABA signaling, further work is still needed in diverse areas of research. A major field of interest will be the identification and characterizations of novel activators, agonists and antagonists of plant ALMTs as well as of second messengers and downstream genes, to hopefully improve our knowledge of GABA signaling and to explore the possibility of manipulating GABA-mediated developmental processes. Equally important would be the crystallization of the ALMT receptor either free or bound to GABA or GABA analogs to understand the action of these drugs and the underlying mechanism of GABA signaling. Finally, the question emerges whether or not the functions of the glutamate-derived amino acids proline and GABA in reproduction may be interconnected. Further work is needed to address these fascinating questions.

Author Contributions
All authors have contributed significantly and have approved the final manuscript.